Release 2.19r
0 0 0 0 0 0
Pages viewed in 2025
Recent Updates
Home Page
18th Apr 2025 16:48 BST
News Page
17th Apr 2025 12:24 BST
Championship Teams 2025
7th Apr 2025 17:07 BST
Newsletter 05-04-25
5th Apr 2025 13:38 BST
Bulletin 85-86 No 7
STAFFORDSHIRE BRIDGE ASSOCIATION 1985 - 86 BULLETIN No. 7 AUGUST 1986
STAFFORDSHIRE C.B.A. CALENDAR 1986-87
September    
7 Multiple Teams of Four for County Clubs Alsager
24 County Committee Meeting Stafford
October    
5 Newport Open Swiss Teams Newport

12

Dawes versus Warwickshire

Stafford

26 County Swiss Pairs Stafford
November    
2 County Restricted Pairs (County Master and below) Stafford
8 - 9 Cannock All Swiss Congress Cannock
23 Dawes versus Leicestershire Leicestershire
30 County Flitch Stafford
December    
7 Coronation Cup Stafford
     
1987    
January    
4 Midland Counties Congress Solihull
27 Dawes versus Worcestershire Stourbridge
February    
1 County Men 's Pairs Stafford
15 County Women 's Pairs Stafford
22 County Multi-Partner Championship Stafford
March    
22 County Mixed Pairs Stafford
April    
5 Staffordshire One Day Congress Stafford
26 Bearn Final Stafford
May    
8 County Annual General Meeting Stafford
11 County Simultaneous Pairs Stafford

League Divisions One and Four play on the Third Wednesday in the months September to March. League Divisions Two and Three play on the Second Wednesday in the months September to March.If you.are not already a member of a League team then get three more players and join. 24 board matches ensure a 10.30 p.m. finish and you can arrange to play local Derby 's privately. Contact Martyn Harris.

SCBA COMMITTEE
Chairman Derek Davies            Vice-Chairman   Applicants invited
Secretary Arthur Bloxham   Treasurer Bob Beech
Captain Arthur Bloxham   Minutes Secretary Ray Stubbs
Bulletin Editor Roy Martin   Master Points Secretary   Roy Martin
EBU Representative Ian Pendlebury   League Secretary Martyn Harris
Membership Secretary   Ian Pendlebury   Results Secretary Basil Cooke
Auditor Basil Cooke   Competitions Secretary Arthur Bloxham
         
SCBA LEAGUE COMMITTEE
Secretary Martyn Harris   County Captain Arthur Bloxham
County Chairman Derek Davies   General Member Harold Goodwin
      General Member Alan Tabbernor
THE STAFFORDSHIRE CUP
1. P. Jones, A. Moss, L. Wood, A. Sowter, D. Marshall Ncl/Sta
2. I. Pendlebury, D. Smith, C. Barnard, D. Patterson, M. Harris Als/Ncl
THE BEARN CUPS         THE FIRST STAFFS SIMULTANEOUS PAIRS
1. I. Pendlebury, D. Smith Als   1. K. Slyde, M. Slyde Tet
2. J. Smith, J. Rudolf Als   2. J. Blades, J. Moore Cha
3. G. Hayward, J. Sheppee Wol   3. E. Shuttleworth, M. Gray Shr
4. M. Swale, R. Stubbs Ncl   4. M. Heal, A. Jones Cre

DAWES V DERBYSHIRE
Home match played on Sunday, 20th April 1986 (at Newcastle B.C.)
The First Team were represented by:

A. Bloxham R. Trounce Sta
G. Davies D. Downs Sta
R. Beech D. Beavon Sta./Wol
M. Ballantine E. Hartland Wol
    Lost 8 - 4
     
The Second Team were represented by:
D. Davies J. Wellsbury Wol
G. Derry E. Watterson Cha
J. Mills D. Mills Ncl
H. Goodwin R. Martin Ncl
    Lost 9 - 3

AMBITION REALISED by MUGGINS
The good news is that P. Brereton; D. Moir; D. Sartain. P. Cutler got through to the 5th round of the Silver Plate. The bad news is that they beat my team in the 4th round to get there. Of course they were lucky, but during the match a long held ambition was fulfilled.

  Capt. Turf     Muggins     Capt. Turf   Muggins  
AKx   J10xx   1D   1S (1) (1) 2D is game forcing in our methods and the hand isn't good enough. 2NT is Baron, so that's out. I thought the hand a bit too mood for 3D.
So I lied.(2) All these bids are systemically forcing - stupid system on this occasion.
(3) Now I know why you don't lie in a higher ranking suit - partner won't be told!
Q10x   Ax   2S   3D (2)
Qxxxx   AJxx   3H (2)   4D (2)
xx   Qxx   4S   P (3)

Opponents cash two clubs, the king still out, and North switches to a small heart. A Q10 combination belongs to the same family as the KJ variety; so I guessed it wrong. I need spades 3 - 3 with the Q onside and diamonds 2-2 with the king onside. This is where I usually tell you that trumps split 6-0 and diamonds 4-0, but no, the God's must have been distracted for a moment and everything is right.

So what ambition was achieved? I made game on our table and on the other table the hand was passed out ...... I've always wanted to do that. (Because he only had AJ doubleton, Clever Clogs).

CHASETOWN BRIDGE CLUB
Now play on Monday evening (7.15 p.m.) at the WINDMILL INN, GENTLESHAW, BURNTWOOD. For further details 'phone Burntwood (05436) 6622.


Progress in the Sullivan Powell (N.W. REGION) by A.C. POOLE

The following gives an account of THE ALSAGER TEAM.

The Engineer and Sportsman had only played together five times before. The Engineer usually played Blue Club and the Sportsman, Precision Club. Both systems being barred from this event so straight Acol was agreed. Unfortunately the only common features between the preferred systems were Ghestem jump overcalls and Sputnik doubles. However, these features were not allowed in this event.

The Engineer and. Sportsman felt that they owed it to their team-mates to hold a practice session, and so a date was set for the fine tuning of their system. Hand 1 saw a good auction to 4H. The contract going one off on a bad trump split. 27 hands later and many rubbers to our team-mates we decided to call it a day (night). However, we did have a few overcalls, eleven points being seen occasionally but usually partner had a balanced two count. At least we did have some defending practice. This being useful on the day of the tournament.

After that background, let's get on with the event:
After a poor start (4-16 defeat, and a 14-6 win) the Alsager team started to make headway.

Third round:
The opposition had bid to a good slam in 6NT after East had opened a weak two in Hearts. A complicated auction took place via a succession of asking bids in hearts, spades and diamonds (I did not have my word processor with me to log all of these bids and anyway I had fallen asleep????).
6NT by West:

                    Engineer                                  
                    Kxx                        
                    QJ                        
                    xxxx                        
                    xxxx                        
West                                   East          
AJ9xx                         Q10  
98                         AK10742  
AKQ                         xxx  
KQJ                         xx  
                    Sportsman                                  
                    xxx                        
                    653                        
                    Jxx    
                    Axxx      

(It is worth mentioning that the Engineer likes to play an aggressive game). The Engineer leads the QH. Dummy goes down and declarer falls into a coma for five minutes. With three more boards to play and the Director saying that we should be on our last board (the opposition had obviously been warned for slow play before), declarer wakes up and runs the 10S, losing to the Engineer's KS.

The Engineer considered his plan, what could that 3H from partner be?

  1. Singleton
  2. Lowest of an odd number (agreed convention), or
  3. Suit preference

A club hit the deck and. declarer was down. Admitted the declarer can always make 6NT without the spade finesse, but is North leading from QJxx. If so, the spade finesse is necessary. If the spade finesse fails and there is not a club switch, the contract can still be made when the JH drops on the second round. Of course I had great faith in partner returning the club. (I only play with good players, I have to in order to stand a chance of winning).

That was a 19-1 win, and we were looking who was ahead of us. Quite a few Staffordshire teams were evident.

Round 4:

The opposition bid a speculative slam which justifiably failed; our team-mates staying in game. A 17-3 win put us in amongst the leaders; we were now at Table 4.

Round 5:

Here we were matched against the most well known team in Staffordshire.

  Engineer     Sportsman      
Jx   A9xxx   1S The sporting gestures of Sportsman must have rubbed off on the Engineer. Give the opposition too much information and hopefully they will hang themselves.
Axxx   KJxx 2D 2H
AQJ1098x   Kx 4NT 5D
~   xx 5NT 6H
          P  
The auction called out for a club lead, and the Ace hit the green baize. Now there were 13 tricks available (even Sportsman couldn't play this contract off). Trumps were 3-2 with the queen onside. The comment from the opposition was, "I can tell you are not Acol players, bidding like that", Their partners were Acol players, but they finished in 4H.
This was perhaps the match which cost us the championship. We won this match by too many imps, resulting in a 20-0 victory. If the slam had gone down, spade lead and queen to three trumps offside, we may have only won by a smaller majority, giving us a final game against a lower placed team. This win put us in first place, one point in front of a Manchester team. This team had been on Table 1 since the second round, Alsager and Belper having this honour on the first round, by way of the alphabetical ordering of the teams.
Round 6:
One point clear playing the team that had had the toughest time holding onto Table 1. The Engineer had bid and made a dodgy vulnerable 3NT. Then came this hand:
Kxx AQJ

A small club, x, Q, K. A diamond to the 10 and North shows out. Thanks to the finesse, nine tricks are now assured. With one board to go we must be in a winning position (aren't we!).

A109x Q
Q10x K8xxx
l0xx KJxx
On the last board the opposition are in a nice little contract of 3C, after the following bidding:
AKQ     1D   3C   P   P      
xxx     P      
QJxxx            
xx            
After a diamond lead, won by the ace; declarer takes out trumps and you eventually get the lead with a spade. It is obvious that nine tricks are there. However, if you, try to cash a spade before leading another diamond to partner's KD, declarer ruffs your spade and gets her losing diamond away. Ten tricks, +130 as against +110 (what the hell).

Comparing results:
The opposition bid and made 4S on a 4-3 fit while we bid and made the dodgy 3NT. They also bid 3NT on the hand above, but declarer got a diamond lead (10 tricks being made). These three hands (including the 3C one) instead of gaining imps, cost us 3 imps. However, we drew this match, but unfortunately the third placed team won 13-7 helping them to leapfrog in front of us. They (Peter Jones, Dave Patterson, Arnold Moss and Dave Marshall) beat us by one point. Giving partner his diamond winner or the last hand would have given us the same number of points as Pete's team.

Moral of this story:
Don't ever stop concentrating until the final card has been played (sorry team!).

Congratulations to the Newcastle team, hopefully they will do well in the grand final.
Finally, since I am leaving the area, I would like to thank all of my partners for putting up with my eccentric bidding and play, lapses in concentration etc, etc over the past years. Look out Manchester players, I am after new partners.

Editorial Comment:
I partnered Tony for about 13 years. He introduced me to Duplicate Bridge and we had a lot of fun playing, Nottingham Club, Shenken Club and Precision Club. I wish him partners that are a whole lot better than me; no-one deserves to be that unlucky twice in one lifetime.


NEW VENUE ... AGAIN!
The Crewe and Nantwich B.C. have moved to: THE LIBERAL CLUB, MILL STREET,NANTWICH.
Club night is still Monday at 7.30 p.m. The Club has doubled its average number of tables (now 11 or 12) since moving to Nantwich. This is one of the seasons major success stories and credit is due to the Club Committee for taking the bold decision to change venues twice in the past six months.
Secretary: Marian Stafford.


THE SPRING FOURSOMES by Bob Beech

Success was hard to come by for the Staffordshire team. of Rudolf, Smith, Beavon and Beech at the Spring Fours' at Leeds in February. After scraping through the first match we met the Wymer team that had just defeated the top seeds (Sowter, Lodge, Kirby, Armstrong, Forrester and Brock) and lost by 11 imps. I have to admit to dropping 18 imps in the last set when, with

Ax I raised partners 2NT opening (showing a solid 6 or 7 card suit with at most a Q out­side) to 3NT. I then bid 4NT over a 4S bid on my left when it was passed round to me. That was one off with 4S doubled going three off.
xx
Ql0xx
AQxx

As one-time losers we went into the draw with the 15 other one-time losers and drew Tony Sowter's team (the eventual winners of the competition). We lost by 27 imps, thus disappearing into the Swiss teams consolation event. However, one hand from the match sticks in the memory:

                    North                 N   E   S   W     I have set out the "thoughts" of the players at each stage of the bidding, together with the relative scores, assuming the contract being doubled where appropriate and with the 'bidding indicated' defence.
The names of the players have been omitted to protect the "innocents".
  • Pass - Shapely, but short of points
  • 1D - I can nearly reverse on this E/W +110
  • 2S - Intermediate, this should cut out their heart suit N/S +230
  • 3H - You reckon? E/W +170
  • 4H - Let's try a cue bid N/S +680
  • 4S - Good idea E/W -100
  • X - Hey! That's my suit E/W -200
  • XX - I've got second round control, partner No change
  • 5D - Me too, partner N/S +680
  • X - Cheeky! No change
  • 5S - I did overcall 2S didn't I? Better remind him No change
  • Pass - On reflection perhaps 3H was a bit pushy No change
  • Pass - I didn't want an 800 penalty anyway! No change
  • 6H - Partner might have two aces - it was a forcing pass, wasn't it? E./W -1100
  • 6S - I wasn't doubled in 5S perhaps they won't double me in six N/S +1430
  • X - Wrong again! N/S +1660
  • Pass - What happened to the 1100 penalty! No change
  • Pass - If partner can double this it must be doing for a million! No change
  • Pass - I don't feel too well - can I have my bid back please? No change
                    109xxx       P   1D   2S   3H    
                    Ax       4H   4S   Dbl   Redbl    
                    x       5D   Dbl   5S   P    
                    Q109xx       P   6H   6S   Dbl    
                              P   P   P        
West                                   East          
x                         K  
KJ10xxx                         Qxxx  
Qxx                         AKJxxx  
xxx                         Kx  
                    South                                  
                    AQJxxx                        
                    x                        
                    xxx   Dealer: North
                    AJx   Game All  
Fortunately Declarer recovered sufficiently to take the two finesses and enable the team to pick up 15 imps as 6H went two off doubled at the other table. There the bidding by N/S failed to pinpoint the best defence.
                              P   1D   1S   X     The two black aces were cashed first, leaving only the trump ace for the final defensive trick.
                              4S   5H   5S   6H    
                              Dbl   P   P   P    

CANNOCK FIRST ALL SWISS CONGRESS November 8th and 9th, 1986
Venue is: Roman Way Hotel, Watling St., Cannock
Saturday: Swiss Pairs (£8), Sunday: Swiss Teams (£5), Full Congress: £12
Further details: Mrs. J.S. Crawford. Burntwood Road, Norton Canes, Cannock, Staffs.
or contact J. Riley, G. Derry, E. Watterson


THE SULLIVAN POWELL by Peter Jones

On the same weekend as Liverpool completed the double, and most of the bridge world was trying to qualify for the National Swiss Teams, the final of the Sullivan Powell was being played at the Grafton Hotel in London. For those who may not be aware this is a sponsored event which is restricted to players below the rank of National Master. Regional heats are staged up and down the country and the ten winners are invited to an all expenses paid trip to London to contest the final. My team, Dave Patterson, Arnold Moss, Dave Marshall and myself took part in the North-West heat staged at an hotel at Nantwich in February, and were fortunate enough to pip Alsager out of first place by one Victory Point. Normally a Manchester based team represents the North West so Staffordshire did well to take first and second place.
The Sullivan Powell, under the direction of Jeremy Flint, has two main objectives in addition to the ranking restriction- First that the game is played in a compet­itive, but friendly, atmosphere and, secondly, that natural bidding methods only are allowed. Even Negative/Sputnik doubles are barred which I found somewhat strange.
When we arrived in London we found that a second Staffs. team would also be contesting the final, as Tettenhall had won the Birmingham qualifying heat. Their team was Roger Steel, Alan Hatrick, Roy Biddlecombe and Mike Boulton.
The format of the final was multiple teams; each team playing a total of 8 boards against every other team. Two by three board rounds to be played on the Saturday, and one two board round on the Sunday - starting at 9.30 a.m.! The scoring was by imps converted to VP's on a 0 to 20 scale. The prizes were presented at noon, to the top four teams, the winners receiving a portable colour T.V. each; the event concluded with an excellent Sunday lunch of smoked salmon with all the trimmings.

Now some hands from the final:
1. You hold Jxxxx Bidding: lC 2H    
    void   2S 3H    
    AJx   3NT 4H    
    AKQxx         Do you bid on?
                 
2.   xx Bidding: 1NT(14-16) 3NT   Partner leads the S6, playing 4th highest leads You win with the king - how do you continue?
    AJ        
    Jx        
    Ql0xxxxx        
      AKx        
      Qxx        
      Ql098xx        
      x        
                 
3 . First in hand you hold: ♠Q10x; Ax; x; ♣AKQJ10xx What do you open?
                 
4.   ~ AKJ10xx     The contract is 6H. The opening lead is a small heart to the ace and a heart returned - both following.
How do you continue?
    K1098xx QJx    
    A xxx    
    AQxxxx 10    
                 
5. First in hand you hold: Kx; void; AKxx; AKxxxxx What do you open?
                 
Answers:
1. My partner held the hand and did well to raise to 6H.
    K   Jeremy Flint suggested: that the auction should have gone:
    AKQJl0xx   1C 2H    
    xx   2S 4H (solid suit)
    Jxx   5D 6H   5D promising a diamond control while denying a spade control.
          P      
                 
2. After due consideration I cashed the ♠A and exited with a third. This caught partner with Qxxxx and an ace, so the contract went two down. Why put this hand in? Because had I switched to a small diamond it would have gone seven off'! Declarer held: ♠J10x; Kl0xx; Kx; ♣AKJx and said that if a diamond had been played she would have risen with the king, hoping to run for home.
                 
3. I decided to open 1C; 1S on my left, pass from partner, 2S on my right. As it now seems highly likely that partner has some sort of diamond stop I bid 3NT. After the lead of the ace and king of spades this was not too difficult. Our team-mates caught a gambling 3NT opening bid, and when informed this had at most one king outside began by cashing a top spade and then switched to a heart - a card that partner must have after the explanation. This pinned partners king, Dummy holding- QJx, and a flat board resulted.
  North held: AKJxx and Dummy:    ♠ xx So how do you defeat it? Switch to a club at trick two and let Declarer get on with it.
    xxx QJx
    AKxx QJl0xx
    x xxx
                 
4. The defence have got off to the best possible start. Any other opening lead and the play is academic. Now you have to apply yourself to the spade or club suit for the contract, i.e. AK and ruffing finesse in spades if the queen has not appeared; or finesse the queen of clubs and pray they are breaking. I think the superior line is to play on spades first. This will only fail when Qxx, Qxxx or Qxxxx are offside. Any other combination either works or you know soon enough that you have to switch to the club suit. What actually happened was that spades were 4-3 with the queen onside. If you elected to play on the club suit there were precisely Kxx onside. I told you it was a friendly competition
                 
5. This was the hand which caused must discussion after the set.
    Kx Ql0xx The overall winners, Andover, bid it:
    void Kl0xxx 2C - 2D   playing Benjaminised Acol, The defence
    AKxx xxx 5C - P   was less than perfect and it made.
    AKxxxxx J      
  At our table:   1C X 1H P making 10 tricks. Our partners had a 2C Benjaminised opening ending in 4C.
At another table they elected to play in diamonds. Their opponents didn't think this would make and told them so - minus 800.
      3C P P P
                       
  Suggested auction:   1C X 1H P          
      2D P 2H P          
      2S P 2NT P          
      3NT P P P          
  Andover won by a street, 149V.P.'s out of a possible 180. Second were Kirkcudbright with 107 and we were third with the same total (but they smashed us 19-1 in our match). And Tettenhall - they also collected a prize-, for coming tenth - well somebody had to come last.

A COMMENT ON PSYCHIC BIDDING by Arthur Bloxham (County Captain)
I consider psychic bids to be the parallel of the cricket bumper. They are legitimate weapons used in moderation at County level and higher. At minor Club level they are ridiculous, can only spoil player's enjoyment and bring the game into disrepute.
A psyche is a bid which is totally inconsistent with the hand held (not to be confused with rather optimistic or pessimistic evaluations of a hand), and the bid should be as much as a surprise to partner as to the opponents.
If, in the course of 10,000 bids in a year, I psyche twice against reasonable standard opponents in County matches or National events, then this is legitimate. If, however, I psyche 100 times playing with the same partner this is a deliberate attempt to cheat. Also, if partner 'fields' the psyche i.e. bids in such a way as to allow for the possibility of a psyche, and not consistent with his hand in relation to the true meaning of the original bid, then this is outright cheating. If you are victims of such bids it is your responsibility to report the situation to the Tournament Director.
The number of bridge players in the County is growing rapidly. I wish this to be reflected in an increasing standard of play, at Club and County level, as well as giving a wealth of pleasure from playing against opponents of all standards. Work hard at improving your game, but whatever standard you achieve make sure your ethics and manners are beyond approach.


ALSAGER B. C. RESULTS AND REPORT

First Division Champions and winners of the Swiss Teams G. Robinson, I. Pendlebury, A Poole and R. Stubbs
Second Division Champions M. Jordan, F. Charles, R. Doughty and A. Crosby
Riley Trophy Winners A. Maddy and R. West
Edwards Trophy Winners S. Riley and C. Goodger
Mens Pairs J. Lockwood and C. Bradley
Ladies Pairs E. Brookes and C. Johnson
Rubber Bridge Knockout C. Foster and L. Meredith
Special Event for E.B.U. Euro-championship Appeal C. Richards and A. Stickly
(this event raised £25 for the appeal).

Unfortunately the most significant event this season occurred away from Bridge table when International Computers Ltd. decided to move Mainframe Systems Division from (in Stoke-on-Trent) to West Gorton (in Manchester). Bridge players affected by this move are Ted Hartley, Alec Robbins, Tony Poole, Ian Pendlebury, Jane Searles, Barbara Kitchenham and Chris Barnard.
The Club also the lost the services of its senior player when Charlie Edwards moved to the Wirral.

1985/86, was a successful year for many Alsager players: Dennis and Elsie Brookes won the Staffs County Flitch, and went on to finish second in the Midlands Flitch at Leicester. In the Staffs County Leagues, 10 teams out of 31 had one or more Alsager players. The most successful teams were Joyce Maddock (Beryl Lawton, Ron West, Angus Maddy), who won Division Four; Ian Pendlebury (Dave Smith, Chris Barnard, Dave Patterson) who won Division Three. The Pendlebury team also reached the fourth round of the Gold Cup, and were finalists in the Staffs Cup losing by 7 imps to Peter Jones' team.

Pauline Rudolf's team. (John Rudolf, John Smith, Barbara Kitchenham, A.N. Other) reached the fifth round of the Gold Cup and finished Sixth in the National Swiss Teams Congress. John Smith and John Rudolf also represented the County in the Tollemache.

Tony Poole and John Aspden successfully defended their Mid-Cheshire Congress Title. Ian Pendlebury and Dave Smith finished second in the North West Pairs Final (the NW Bearn) and fifth in the NW green pointed pairs.

The best result of the season occurred in the National Masters Pairs with Pauline Rudolf and Ian Pendlebury winning and John Rudolf with John Smith finishing second.


THE STAFFORDSHIRE MULTI-PARTNER CHAMPIONSHIP

So you don't like Individuals. Your strange partners always insist on agreeing detailed responses to a 2C opening, and then play like they learned the game yesterday. How about playing with just three individuals all of whom you have chosen yourself. One will. probably be your favourite partner, no need to discuss system with him/her. The other two you may have played with before, even if not you can decide your system details at leisure. Possibly get in a practice, session or two at your local club or a Rubber bridge session at your place. A multi-partner event is one in which four players enter as a unit. The idea is that you play three sessions of matchpointed pairs and the four players make up a different partnership for each session i.e. you play once with each player in your unit. The player with the highest combined percentage over the three sessions is the winner of the event.

Simple, enjoyable and ten times better than an individual. Try it and see. It will take place on Sunday 22nd of February. Just put your four names on the notice board in your club.


Muggitorial

I've hardly written anything for this Bulletin and I've also got a few things in hand. I like it. But more is needed because some of my feature writers are either leaving the County or giving up bridge - somewhat extreme reactions to my Editorship, don't you think? Also after 6 ego boosting appearances on the front page, someone has relegated me to the back page - I shall write a letter of protest (or, at least I will if you don't supply me with sufficient material).

25 or so people turned up to the A.G.M.; nobody threw anything at the Chairman; Elaine Watterson presented the prizes: it was decided not to introduce seeding into the Staffs Cup. Nobody wants to buy a house in Salt, so Arthur Bloxham has paid his subscription for another year and we allowed him to keep all his jobs too....

Bob Beech has decided to have 12 months away from bridge (I once went 12 days without bridge it nearly killed me). While we won't miss being battered at the bridge table by him, we will miss his services to the County.

Some stupid computer company is moving its software dept. up north; among the bridge players affected is Ian Pendlebury. He expects to be with us this season but is likely to go missing thereafter - once again, it is the County's loss.

New members on the Committee are John Barrett and Neil Morley. John has taken over the post of Treasurer he paid my expenses without any quibble, so he must be good. Neil is an E.B.U. Tournament Director and those who have seen him in action, along with his computer, will have appreciated his expertise. He has volunteered to be a delegate to the E.B.U., to provide a trophy to be presented to the Fourth Division winners, persuaded us to appoint an Appeals Referee, set up a psyche recording procedure and offered to direct a one-day Staffs Congress if we can set it up. Phew! I just hope we can keep up with him. Welcome to you both.

We have not held an Individual competition for some years now so we have given it the order of the boot. In its place is a new competition called The Multi-Partner Championship and Arthur has kindly donated a trophy. You will find some details about this competition elsewhere in the Bulletin.

John Hudson will be disappointed to learn of the demise of the County Winter Pairs., He started this competition and in its early days was quite successful; but it has lost its popularity and must make way for the new.

One of the 'new' has arisen out of an E.B.U competition for Club Teams of Eight. Each County is, invited to send a Club team to play in this event, and so we will run a competition to decide our entry. All Clubs should look out for, details and enter a team.

As mentioned last time we have lost some of our trophies and two of them will now be replaced. using County funds. They are the Staffs Cup and the Mixed Pairs Trophy.

The Club entry entitlement for the Bearn Final has been formalised to: "One quarter of the total club entry, rounded up". It was also decided that all clubs must send the initial entry fees (£1.40 per pair) to the Treasurer by the First of January. Obviously this is vital now so as to be able to plan the format of the Final.

For our Sunday competitions the cost will be £3.50 per person, which includes refreshments, and play will start at 2.00 p.m. to facilitate an earlier finish.

TOP COUNTY MASTERPOINT WINNERS

I. Pendlebury 1329 + 8 = 2129     G. Davies 1057 + 3¼ = 1384
D. Smith 1071 + 7¼ = 1796     L. Wood 736 + 6 = 1336
A. Moss 1059 + 6 = 1650     A. Sowter 736 + 6 = 1336
J. Rudolf 1097 + 4½ = 1547     P. Jones 741 + 5½ = 1291
J. Smith 1097 + 4½ = 1547     G. Derry 1146 + 1 = 1246
R. Beech 1328 + 1½ = 1478     E. Watterson 1039 + 1 = 1139
D. Beavon 1328 + 1½ = 1478     A. Slater 1050 = 1050

Editor, Roy Martin 1, Baron. St., Fenton, ST4 3PH