Release 2.19r
0 0 0 0 0 0
Pages viewed in 2026
Recent Updates
MCOL Dawes 2025/26
15th Jan 2026 11:52 GMT
Home Page
13th Jan 2026 17:04 GMT
Newsletter 29-12-25
29th Dec 2025 22:46 GMT
News Page
7th Dec 2025 12:21 GMT
Bulletin 84-85 No 3
STAFFORDSHIRE CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCIATION - BULLETIN No. 3 MARCH 1985

Muggitorial

Welcome to two newly affiliated clubs, Crewe and Stone. They bring the total to 13 which is surely a record for the County.

This is the Bulletin which contains the County A.G.M. notification to members. O.K. so it is a bit early; the alternatives are to receive it after the A.G.M. is over (via the E.B.U. Magazine), or on time (but at great expense) by post.

R.W.M.


CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS - Harold Goodwin

A strange County Staffordshire. A record entry of 35 pairs for the Mixed Pairs held in October - excellent. So why only 8 pairs for the first round of the Winter Pairs? This is held on the fourth Wednesday of every month and deserves better support. Is there something about the format (Butler scoring) that you do not like? If so, let your Committee know about it. Success at this event will brim you to the notice of the County Captain when he is considering teams for Dawes matches. (Note 1.)

March 24th draws nearer - Staffordshire's first One Day Green Point Event - Arthur and Basil will need help so don't be shy at coming forward.

As well as the prestige of staging this event there should be a healthy boost to the County's finances. These are satisfactory at the moment thanks to the prompt collection of subscriptions by the new Subs. Sec. (Ian P.), who is doing a grand job.

Congratulations also to the new Bulletin Editor. He goes under various aliases - The Welsh Pedlar, Muggins, Roy Martin etc. (Note 2.). Comments on his refreshing, and amusing approach to Bulletin No. 1. have been very favourable. Personally I thought it was a disaster! Well when you play 35 boards quite brilliantly and have a slight misunderstanding on the 36th, why is that the one that gets recorded in the Bulletin for all to see? (Note 3.).

At a Committee meeting held in September a welcome visitor was John Hudson, the previous County Sec. over from sunny Spain for a minor operation. This was rather fortuitous as I had brought 'The Hudson Trophy' for the Committee to see and approve. The Midlands Congress had asked Staffordshire to present a trophy for use at the Congress, and in recognition of John and Renee's services to bridge it bears their name. If you are holidaying in the Alicante area of Spain, near to Benidorm, and want a game of bridge, John will be only too pleased to arrange this for you. His address is:

La Casa Vieja, CA-LL l4, Lucca, Javea, Alicante, Spain.

Note 1. Better still, write to the Bulletin.
Note 2. The Welsh Pedlar won't thank you for thinking he is Roy Martin. In fact he will probably sue for deformation of character. Roy Martin denies any relationship with Muggins - the less I see of him the better.
Note 3. Substitute 'moderately' for 'quite brilliantly', 'total disaster' for 'slight misunderstanding'.
Note 4. Note 3. was written by the Chairman. He will be pleased to know about the wealth of material I have collected this year as we went out in the first round of: The Staffs Cup, Gold Cup, Silver Plate and Crockfords.

JETTISON - what muggins' partners would like to do to him.

TOLLEMACHE CUP (Qualifying round) - Arthur Bloxham.
The event is played in three sessions, six boards in each session against each team. At the finish it is scored as 16 board matches and the IMP's converted to Victory Points. Each of eight (12 player allowed) plays as two separate teams of four, whose IMP's are aggregated.
We played in the same formation throughout:

A. Bloxham and G. Davies N/S B. Topley and P. Tottenham
R. Beech and D. Beavon E/W Link and J. Fawcett

Both foursomes ended the weekend sharing the positive IMP score almost equally. Final positions in the qualifying round:

Staffordshire 64   VP      
Gloucestershire 57   Won 19 - 1
Somerset 54   Won 11 - 9
Norfolk 50   Won 18 - 2
Sussex 42   Lost 1 - 19
Devon 33   Won 15 - 5

Finalists from the other qualifying rounds were: North West, Derbyshire, Hertfordshire, Dorset & Wilts

Try your declarer play on this hand. You are in four spades with, on the lie of the cards, three outside losers and you get the three of spades lead. Your trump holding are:

  Declarer Dummy
AK972 J864

You play low in dummy, RHO plays the 10 taken with the King. What now?

Staffordshire were seeded (as a consequence of reaching the final last year) and received a reasonable draw. After the first session we were lying second on 56 (average being 50) behind Devon, due mainly to a 40 IMP lead over Gloucestershire. In the second we continued with another steady performance and were leading with 59 V.P. but three other Counties were above 50. The third session on Sunday started badly losing ground in the matches against Sussex and Somerset ; we had lost the initiative and victory prospects appeared poor. However, the experience and team spirit which remained high came to our aid, and the whole team responded in a very professional manner. Two good wins against Norfolk and Gloucestershire brought us back into contention and we were level with Sussex on 49 V.P. with one match to finish. Sussex went into their last match against Gloucestershire 3 IMP's down while we were 12 MP's down to Devon. We had a fine match, gaining 33 IMP's to win 15-5 and had to wait for Sussex's result - they now needed a 30 IMP swing to overtake us. In fact they lost IMP's and we had made the final for the third year out of four. We were the only seed to reach the final with the other groups all having surprising results.

The strong North West team won through very easily with London, winners of the last two finals, making no challenge at all. Derbyshire had a magnificent weekend, white washing their group which included the strong Hants & I.O.W. and Warwickshire teams. Hertfordshire just edged out the very powerful Middlesex team and Dorset & Wilts won their group beating the seeds and strong group favourites Yorkshire.

How did you play the trumps? I'm sure you did as the Sussex declarer and crossed to dummy to take the marked finesse, which loses to the Queen...... A Geoff Davies Coup.


MERRIMAC COUP - a play perpetrated by a sloshed Scot.
DESCHAPELLES COUP - hell of a play by that chap Des.
OVERTAKING - what the Austrian Princess does on roundabouts.
DECEPTION - a bid or play that completely fools your partner and has no affect whatever on opponents.

GOLD CUP - ROUND TWO by Bob Beech

With sixteen of the forty-eight boards to go you are comfortably leading by 50 imps when you pick up, at game all, the following hand: AQ9xx; AKx; x, AKJx

Playing Acol you open 2S and over partner's 3S positive response, you wheel out, the "Old Black". The 5H response to the 4NT inquiry promises, 2 of the 5 key cards (trump King and the four Aces) so without more ado you finish the auction with a jump to 6S.
Whilst awaiting the opening lead you begin to regret your impetuosity as realisation dawns that you may have missed a stone cold Grand Slam. However, on the lead of the heart jack (Roman style) you discover that partner has nothing in reserve and you have judged the final contract nicely.

Kl0x You win the opening lead with the ace, East playing the 2 - normal signals, and pause to consider your options. Assuming spades are breaking you can count 5 trumps, 2 hearts, 1 diamond and 2 clubs. That's 10 tricks; 2 club ruffs or the club finesse by a heart discard on a top club and a heart ruff will provide 2 more tricks. On the basis that the club Queen may come down in three (avoiding the necessity of a second club ruff) or that East may have the fourth club (dummy can then ruff the second club in safety); or, if West has the fourth club he may also have the spade J (East then being unable to over-ruff dummy's 10) you opt for the first line.
10xx
AJxxx
xx
   
AQ9xx
AKx
x
AKJx

The club Ace and King are followed by a low club ruffed small in dummy. All right so far, but the Queen did not appear and so a second club ruff is required. There are two routes back to hand: (a) via the heart King or (b) via diamond Ace, diamond ruff and thought must be given to the order as you will need to return to hand after the second club ruff. It must be correct to come back with heart first because: (i) East will be ruffing a loser if he ruffs in front of you (West holding 6 hearts) (ii) It will also prevent West discarding his second heart (West holding Jx in hearts and 3 clubs) when you lead the club Jack to ruff in Dummy... You therefore lead a heart to your King and note the fall of East's 3 and West's Queen. West's QUEEN!! Now that's a bonus you had not included in your calculations.
Safety first now. No more club ruffs as you only need spades to break or a singleton Jack. A spade to the King followed by the ace and queen draws trumps and, as no squeeze develops, a club is conceded at trick 13.

Jxx xx The East-West hands were as shown. A 29 point vulnerable slam, played with no little care, in a 5-3 fit is something that you are not ashamed to return to your home table with.
QJ xxxxx
Kxxx Q10x
Q10xx xxx

Unfortunately, as earlier mentioned, the opposition being 50 imps down had bid and made 7S after a club away from the queen, (West does have a difficult opening lead), so 13 imps away. Annoyingly the other declarer did not even find out about the doubleton heart QJ until after he had discarded a heart from dummy on the top club. Never mind, virtue is its own reward and thoughtful play isn't always forgotten on a losing board. For the record I was dummy on this hand and despite the setback we did win the match.


DAWES vs NOTTINGHAMSHIRE - Away match played on Sunday, 25th November

The first team were represented by:
      A. Bloxham & G. Davies (Stafford)
  R. Beech & A. Mallett (Wolverhampton/Stafford)
  G. Link & J. Fawcett (Wolverhampton)
  R. Martin & R. Stubbs (Newcastle)
        WON 9 - 3
         
The second team were represented by:
  D. Davies & Mrs J. Wellsbury (Wolverhampton)
  R. Biddlecombe & M. Boulton (Wolverhampton)
  H. Goodwin & Mrs M. Swale (Newcastle)
  D. Marshall & A. Moss (Newcastle)
        WON 7 - 5

LOSER ON LOSER - Muggins' articles
RECTIFYING THE COUNT - Muggins actually did this once, he was in a Grand Slam at the time.

Affiliated Clubs
Alsager (ALS); Basford (BAS); Crewe (CRW); Chasetown (CHA); Newcastle (NCL); Newport (NPT); Oswestry (OSW); Sandbach (SAN); Shrewsbury (SHR); Stafford (STA); Stone (STN); Tettenhall (TET); Wolverhampton (WOL).

HOW THE TWO OF SPADES CAUSED A NASTY ACCIDENT

                    North                                  
                    84                       Contract: 3NT by South
                    AJ9                        
                    AKQ5                       East-West: Two Little Old Ladies
                    K1063                        
West (LOL)                         East (LOL)  
KQ1053                         J62 Opening Lead: King of spades
10642                         K53  
7                         J864  
Q94                         J82  
                    South (Grandma Muggins)
                    A97                        
                    Q87                        
                    10932    
                    A75      
1. The LOL found the king of spades lead,
Her partner perpetrated a dastardly deed,
A discouraging spade he played,
Leaving LOL quite dismayed.
  2. The two of hearts was a nasty switch,
I thought I was quids in the nasty b..ch,
RHO took his king to return a spade,
Three rounds before the ace was made.
3. A, K of diamonds all is clover,
LOL discards, contract over?
I'll do a Bob Beech and think this through,
Cash two hearts, two clubs and a third one true.
  4. The blighters end-played to lead a diamond,
But LOL has the queen, I'm frightened,
Two more spades brings their total to six,
Undertricks two, a bottom, a fix.
5. 'Hey Bob! I've been thinking,
If after the diamond news, how stinking,
I duck a club to right hand oppo',
Any return will leave me top ho'.
  6. The clubs will break apace,
Three diamonds, three clubs, two hearts, an ace,
Nine tricks in the bag as easy as pie,
It's so simple I could cry.
7. This expert thinking is very good,
Pity I can't do it when I should,
Two days later isn't clever,
But surely better than nearly never.
  8. All I've to do is think a bit faster,
In this way I'll avoid disaster,
So come on Bob, don't just snigger,
Write an article that will make me quicker.

MIXED PAIRS CHAMPIONSHIP
Played on Sunday, 14th October, 17½ Tables
Tournament Director: Martyn Harris

1. Mr & Mrs S and B Davies Newport
2. Mrs L. Burnley,    P. Cutler Wolves
3. Mrs E. Watterson,    J. Riley Chasetown
4. Mrs M. Swale,     R. Stubbs Newcastle

Editorial Note: I accepted a hefty bribe to include fourth. (Actually it was a hefty threat, but bribe sounds less cowardly).


SYSTEMS, CONVENTIONS, TREATMENTS AND THINGS

Two Notrumps After a Simple Two Level Response in a New Suit
i.e. 1D 2C       1H 2C or 2D       1S 2C, 2D or 2H  
  2NT     2NT     2NT    

Traditionally this rebid shows a reasonably balanced 15 or 16 points and is not forcing. In practice the rigid 2NT is only passed when responder is absolutely minimum for his two level response; not a frequent occurrence.

The modern tendency is to use the 2NT rebid as forcing to game. The reason for this is it allows efficient exploration for the best contract when holding strong balanced hands. As a consequence you can avoid having to bid at the three level in a second four card suit and it removes the obligation to make the stifling lurch to 3NT on a balanced 17 to 19 points. It also puts certain constraints on both partners in the following ways:

1. A new suit at the two level must promise at least 10 points or 9 points and a reasonable (usually 5 card) suit.
2. It follows that if responder's hand does not meet the requirements in (1.) he must bid 1NT. While still showing the normal 6 to 9 points it may, on occasion, be quite unbalanced (usually called the 'negative 1NT').
  e.g. (a) x After 1H from opener you should respond 1NT. Acol purists may shudder at this heresy, but nothing would make me bid 2C with this collection
    xx
    QJxx
    KJxxxx
3. The 2NT rebid must be a good 15 points or better
  e.g. (b) Jx   1H 2C     Bid 2H or 3C; if the ends the auction
    AQxxx   ?       you are high enough.
    KJx            
    Axx            
  e.g. (c) Kx   1H 2C     Bid 2NT; opposite something like: ♠Qxx; xx; 10xx; ♣AKxxx you would want to be in game.
    AJ10xx   ?      
    AJx          
    Q10x          
There are a couple of exceptions within the negative 1NT philosophy and these occur when responder has:
(i) Support for opener's major suit and a fair suit outside.
  e.g. (d) Qxx If partner opens 1S, then a spade contract is desirable. Game is not beyond reach and if opener has 5 or more spades it will be a good contract most of the time.
    x
    AJ10xx
    xxxx Say 1S 2D or 1S 2D
          2S 4S   2H 2S
  the latter is a slight underbid but heart length/strength does little to improve your hand - opener is still there and you would except any game try from him (remember he knows you are quite good, you didn't bid 1NT)
(ii) A long and reasonable heart suit and partner has opened 1S.
  e.g. (e) Jx   1S ?     if you bid INT opener will fit, you like a glove! Try 2H and keep your fingers crossed. You can pass 2S, rebid hearts or raise 3H to 4H.
    KQl0xxx          
    Jxxx          
    x          
Let us examine a few hands to see how the flexible 2NT response works.
  e.g. (f) AQJxx   1S 2D     Using the rigid 2NT rebid you are forced tobid: 3C (promising a suit), 3NT (giving upthe 5-3 spade fit?) or 3S (showing a 6 card suit)
    Kxx   ?      
    AJx          
    Kx          
  None of these options lend themselves to constructive bidding. 2NT (forcing) will allow responder to explore for the spade/diamond game/slam, or to play in 3NT when that is right.
  e.g. (g) x   1H 2C     Obviously everyone bids 3D. But can opener have: ♠Qx; KQJ10x; AQ10x; ♣Kx ? There is a big difference in the hands. If responder bids 3NT you happily pass with the latter - but won't you be worried with hand (g)?
    KQJ10x   ?      
    AQ10xx          
    Kx          
Using the forcing 2NT you can differentiate between the two below the level of 3NT. A jump rebid in a new suit after a two level response must show an unbalanced hand and /or one worried about playing in 3NT. Now when responder bids 3NT, you can pass knowing that he has length/values in the black suits and no great liking for your suits.
  e.g. (h) Qxx   1S 2H     This leap to 3NT is much sharper. Openerhas 17-19 points, 4 spades and two hearts withgood minor suit guards.
    AJxxx   3NT      
    Kx          
    xxx          
  e.g. (i) KQxx   1H 2D     Bid 2NT; you can still find your spade or heart fit and responder is fairly certain you arebalanced (I guess you may be short in diamonds every now and again - a matter of style).
    AJ10xx   ?      
    Qx          
    Kx          
  e.g. (j) KQxx   1H 2D     Bid 2S; the forcing reverse is descriptive, and over (say) 2NT rebid by responder your bid of 3D will complete the picture nicely.
    AJ10xx   ?      
    KQx          
    x          
  e.g. (k) KQxx   1H 2D     This is a matter of style. Use your considerable psychic talent to fathom whether to bid 2S or 2NT. Must confess that losing the first 5 club tricks in 3NT is not my idea of fun bridge.
    AJ10xx   ?      
    KQ          
    Jx          
So there you are: rigidity is out, flexibility is in.
Postscript
Another idea that fits in well with the above is to use a new suit rebid over a two level response as a one round force.
  e.g.       1H 2C     When was the last time your partner passed in this situation?The negative 1NT makes it almost certain that responder will bid again, so making a new suit rebid forcing will lose you little. As with the 2NT rebid it adds a feeling of comfort and security to your auctions and allows the maximum of room for investigation.
          2D      
  e.g. AJ10xx   1S 2D     Do you really want to jump to 3H? If 2H is forcing it will allow partner to make a low level descriptive bid which must help you to discover the potential of the two hands.
    AKJx   ?      
    KQx          
    x          
  e.g. AKJ10x   1S 2C     There are also side benefits. Previously your jump to 3D could cover a multitude of hands. Now it shows a good 5-5 just short of an Acol Two bid. All this because a simple 2D would have been a one round force.
    x   ?      
    AQ10xx          
    Qx          
Adoption of these two simple ideas will convert your steam age Acol into a powerful modern vehicle for accurate bidding. Incidentally, it improves your opponents' defence no end!

ONLY IF YOU ARE REALLY, REALLY BORED WILL YOU BOTHER WITH THIS

I wrote the hands down on my score card and, as often happens, several hands were added during the session. A week later things were rather dim in my memory, but I guess my hand and dummy are among the following somewhere:
  (a)   (b)   (c)   (d)   (e)
KQ3   QJ3   A42   A42   QJ3
Q104   543   AJ7   AK8   Q43
QJ2   54   AK72   AK72   Q54
A876   KQJ87   J109   1094   KQ76
The bidding was:
    1D 2C            
    3NT P            
The opening lead was the 6 of spades; the breaks were foul and everything lies badly. The post mortem revealed that best defence will hold me to 10 tricks. Unfortunately I made a simple, early, mistake and the defence was red hot, holding me to eight tricks. Find my hand and dummy and plan the play better than I did.

COUP EN PASSANT - dirty trick perpetrated on Muggins by the peasants he plays against.
HISTORY LESSON - A Muggitorial Account

Millions of years ago, before the advent of humanity destroyed the enchanted ether that permeated the universe, only magical creatures (and a few dinosaurs) existed. At the time of which I wish to write there were six major races, (Goblins, Dwarves, Trolls, Ogres, Fairies and Elves), and a number of 'Uniques' - so called because there were only one of each, (e.g.s Griffin, Pheonix, Dragon, Pi, Muggins).

Goblins and Dwarves were small, ugly and vaguely humanoid. They were also indistinguishable; not only could you not tell them apart, neither could they. Since they hated each other with a lunatic passion, this inability to recognise their enemy was a serious setback. A Goblin creeping up on a Dwarf and battering it about the head with a borrowed shillelagh, only to find out later it was his Mother-in-Law, was considered a terrible blunder (at least it turned out that way when his wife found out). Also being called a Dwarf when one was a Goblin (or vice versa) was an insult that could only be assuaged by a fight to the death; unfortunately if it was a Troll, for instance, that had made the error in recognition then the death to which they fought was that of the Goblin or Dwarf.

This situation obviously had to be remedied and my simple solution was rapidly adopted: all the Goblins wore tee-shirts with a big 'G' emblazoned on them; Dwarves sported a large 'D'. Trolls were large and appeared to have been sculptured from granite by a drunken artist. Their temperament and intelligence matched their looks: slow, hard and thick. Ogres were just incredibly hideous giants with appalling manners. fairies were small, pretty and fiendishly cunning. Elves were slightly bigger with a devil-may-care approach to life. Griffin is a lion's body with an eagle's head and wings, while slow to anger it makes excellent sense to scarper quick if he begins a slow boil. Everybody knows Phoenix and Dragon; the former occasionally bursts into flames and the latter flames in bursts. Pi was, and still is, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter; no longer is he corporeal but just as irrational so I am told. What does he look like you ask? Transcendental of course, what else? Me? I was a handsome dashing fellow in those days, but a couple of million years have taken their toll to leave the decrepit wreck you know so well today.

With the exception of Pi and I the creatures were always fighting one another over things of no importance (very much like nowadays come to think of it). So I introduced them to the best warfare of them all; where the vanquished can return to fight again and again, in short to the game of Bridge.

At the inaugural meeting of the Enchanted Land's League Teams of Four Association (ELLTOFA) it was decided that each race would enter a team and a Uniques foursome would bring the total to seven. Six head-to-head matches of 28 boards, imps converted to VP's. The Imps (present as observers) objected to this, but on a show of hands (or equivalent were defeated primarily because the Victory Points had shown up in large numbers - various scales were present each wishing to be chosen as the Official Conversion Scale.

Quickly appointing myself captain of the Uniques I was immediately faced with the delicate task of choosing the team. I had the choice of being torn to pieces, dropped from a great height, circumscribed or roasted depending on whom I left out. Fortunately Pi had an appointment to chase round in circles and Dragon needed a decoke, so for our first match against the Dwarves I partnered Phoenix and Griffin played with his good mate Manticore (they have a body in common).

The first hand was routine:

Holding AKQ10x I hear partner open with 3NT, showing a solid 7+ card minor suit and no ace or king outside. I can bid 6C now but partner may have a heart void so I bid a conventional 4D. A 4H response informs me that he has a singleton or void in hearts and 5H from me asks which. 5S, showing a singleton, is the disappointing reply so I settle for 6C.
  x
  AKJ10x
  Jx
     
LHO leads the ace of hearts and dummy has:
  Jx 6C bid and made, +920, and an obvious flat board. Yes?
  x  
  Qx  
  AKQ10xxxx  
The Dwarves are playing a complex Big Club system in which 3NT openings show a balanced 29 or 30 points (obviously a useful bid to have in your armoury, although its frequency of occurrence is, I think, quite low). Consequently the little beggar on the other table opened 5C and his partner, with all the sophistication and caution his kind are noted for, raised to 7C. Griffin decided not to lead from his king of hearts and declarer claimed his 15 tricks. -1440 and 11 imps deposited in the out column. However the half time comparison reveals that we lead by 16 imps.

The next 13 boards are all played in 1NT making between 7 and 11 tricks and every one of them is flat. The Fairies are playing the Trolls and are sharing our boards; they also had a big half time lead in their match which makes me suspicious about this series of coincidences - I might report it to the Elltofa League Committee, the use of magic being against the proprieties.

The last board sees partner and I with the following hands:

AKxxx   10xxxx     2NT (1) 3H (2)
AQ   K109x     4C (3) 4S (4)
xxx   AJx     P (5)  
AKx   x        
(1) The cretin on the other table will, no doubt, open 2NT so I do too. Really prefer 1S.
(2) Transfer
(3) Likes spades, cue-bid
(4) Dislikes his trump suit
(5) Probably too many trumps and not enough outside tricks. Two quick diamond losers?
  On the other Table
  1S (1) 4C (2) (1) Not such a cretin
  4H (3) 5D (4) (2) Splinter slam try - a touch aggressive?
  5NT (5) 6H (6) (3) Cue-bid, responsive since below game level
  7S P (7) (4) Cue-bid, positive acceptance of the slam try. Well he does have 8 points and a singleton.
      (5) Grand Slam Force
      (6) Specifically showing the Queen (5 small = Q)
      (7) If the Laws allowed he would have raised to 8S I'm sure.
You know the rest of the story: spades are 2-1, the Jack of hearts falls in three rounds and we lose 17 imps. So a draw and 10VP's to each team - but they get the masterpoints because they won the match by 1 imp. This is a blow because I was hoping to attain the rank of Cavemaster by the end of the season.
(to be continued.......MAYBE)

Afterword
The second hand actually occurred in a Swiss Teams match and the auction was identical up to 7S. I was holding the big hand and, as you would expect, LHO doubled - spades were 3-0 and the Jack of hearts did not fall. -500 looked pretty bad, but one of our teammates on the other table found a terrible double of 6S. Fortunately this too went off and our loss on the board was mitigated slightly.

SOLUTION TO ' ONLY IF YOU ARE REALLY.........'

  1. Only (c) and (d) will open 1D
  2. (c) and (a) have the 2 of diamonds in both hands
  3. (c) and (b) have the J of clubs in both hands
  4. (d) and (a) have the 2 of diamonds in both hands
  5. (c) and (e): best defence holds to 9 tricks, 2S + 1H + 3D + 3C. Defenders can take the ace of clubs and clear the spades, threatening to take 3S + 1H + 1C
  6. (d) and (e): best defence and worst lie holds to 9 tricks, 2S + 3H + 3D + 1C
  7. (d) and (b): on the surface you have 2S + 2H + 2D + 4C. But if you play the Q or J of spades at trick one it will hold. Defenders take the third club and clear the spades (lead through dummy - play queen and king covers, play low and king will remain to take the queen) depriving you of an entry to the clubs. Opening lead can be from 65 or K10965. But, if you play low from dummy at trick one, taking the ace in hand, the remaining QJ will force an entry to dummy giving 2S + 2H + 2D + 4C (10 tricks) however the spades are distributed

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Dear Sir,

In regard to the recent letter concerning the probabilities, I can confirm that 'Oddity's Law' holds good i.e. "The higher your Master Point rank, the more the probabilities favour you". The corollary is: "If your opponent is two ranks or more superior, then your probabilities will be halved". It follows that if the 'two rank' situation appertains you should not bid a game or slam unless it is a 100% certainty - this gives you a 50% chance of making it.

Foolishly partner and I ignored this obvious fact on the following hands:

AKQ   9xxxxx   2NT 3H (Transfer)
Axx   x   4S 4NT (Roman Blackwood)
Qx   A109xx   5C 6S
AJ9xx   x   P  

As you can see, provided spades are not 4-0, the contract is about 75%, i.e. a double finesse in diamonds. North leads the 8 of diamonds and as dummy is revealed you notice the National Master on your right is smiling sweetly (don't they always). The double finesse is not looking so good; he'll have both K and J for sure. The 68% 3-2 break is a consideration, (give him his king, dropping the jack later), but then he'd have KJxx and give his partner a ruff. Only a 28% normally but a 56% chance for him. Perhaps the best bet is to rise with the ace and hope trumps are 2-2 (41%). In reality, of course, the even break is at most 20%. Eventually I opt for running the diamond round to my queen and, as expected, expert takes his king and gives his partner a ruff. Incidentally, the trumps were 3-1.

A second example:

AK   Jxxx   1D (1H) X (Sputnik)
QJx   xx   1NT   2NT
A9xxx   QJ10x   3NT   P
Jxx   AQx        

A small heart is led from AKxxx. The king of diamonds is with the expert South, so I have 2 spades, 1 heart, 5 diamonds and a club. The game is 100% and so I have a 50% chance of making it. On the lead of the queen of diamonds the NM smiles sweetly again and points out the lead is in hand. "You must lead a diamond from hand", he adds with Secretary Bird insistence. "Never mind", say partner, "perhaps you'll drop the singleton king". This is about a 6%; 3% for me - and zero % when RHO is insisting you play from hand. Losing 12 imps for playing in an icy game is about right (you can save an imp or two by playing in a partscore).

I've written to the President of the N.L.F. for the Freedom of the Odds; my letter has about a 45% chance of arriving safely.

Yours most sincerely,

Jack 'Safety Play' McGraw


Dear Sir,  
  He played with Marjorie on Mondays,
Tom on Tuesdays,
Warren on Wednesdays,
Terry on Thursdays,
Freda on Fridays,
And Boris on weekends,
He never played with me because I can't play the stupid game,
I chided him on Monday,
Nagged him ragged on Tuesday,
Cried my heart out on Wednesday,
Screamed at him on Thursday,
Slapped his face on Friday,
I shot him dead on Saturday,
Buried him in the garden on Sunday (the kids enjoyed that),
And cancelled all his bridge from Monday,
So if you don't see him about don't worry.
  Yours faithfully,
  Bridge Widow
   
Dear Sir,  
  What did I tell you?!
  Yours clinically,
                      The Bulletin Psychiatrist

COUNTY SWISS PAIRS

Held on Sunday, 18th of November. 22 pairs competing and excellently run by Martyn Harris. Last years winners set out to prove that that win wasn't just luck...........and they fluked it again!
1. A. Brian J. Riley (Chasetown)         
2. J. Eaden B. Cooke (Wolves/Stafford)  
3. A. Moss J. Smith (Newcastle)  
         
22. R. Martin R. Stubbs (Anonymous) The Editor enjoyed the food.

CORONATION CUP

14 teams from 8 Counties met to do battle on Sunday, 2nd December.
Staffordshire took 5 of the top 6 places - but not the one which counts.

  1. Warwickshire
  2. D. Davies, J. Wellsbury, E. Hartland, M. Ballantine
  3. R. Beech, D. Beavon, B.P. Topley, A. Topley
  4. A. Bloxham, G. Davies, R. Perry, D. Downs

SUCCESS

Peter Jones and David Patterson from Newcastle B.C. are the first winners of the Hudson Trophy, presented by Staffordshire for the Men's Pairs Championship at the Midland's Congress.

The Editor, having played with the Welsh Pedlar on numerous (unfortunately) occasions, gives his heartiest congratulations to David in overcoming a massive handicap to win the title. (I'm kidding Pete, honest!).


STAFFORDSHIRE CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCIATION

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING, 1985

7.00 p.m. FRIDAY, 3RD MAY 1985 AT STAFFORD B.C.

A G E N D A

  1. Apologies
  2. Minutes of the 1984 A.G.M,
  3. Matters Arising
  4. Secretary's Report
  5. Treasurer's Report
  6. Captain's Report
  7. Chairman's Report
  8. Smoking
  9. Bearn (Semi-Final or NOT).
  10. Presentation of Trophies and Prizes
  11. Election of Officers
    • Chairman
    • Vice-Chairman
    • Secretary
    • Minuting Secretary
    • Treasurer
    • Captain
    • Bulletin Editor
    • Master Points Secretary
    • EBU Representative
    • League Secretary
    • Subscriptions Secretary
  12. Any Other Business

It is anticipated that bridge will he played when the Annual General Meeting has closed.

Editor: Roy Martin. 1, Baron St., Fenton, ST4 3PH. SOT