Suffolk Contract Bridge Association
CAPTAIN'S LOG

♠   ♣ 

Click on Captain's Log to see analysis by the County Captain, Paul Whetton, of some interesting hands played by Suffolk teams in the National online Teams League and Eastern Counties League.

Latest report is of the ECL match played on March 2 which also includes information regarding Paul's resignation from his role as County Captain.

Apologies for no report on Match 7 because of other commitments.

♠   ♣ 

Release 2.19r
0 0 0 0 0 0
Pages viewed in 2025
October 2019

In all the boards below, N and S Pass, unless stated otherwise. If necessary, click on 'Show Detail' to see hands.

After you have worked out how you would bid the board, click on ‘Show Answer’ and compare your bidding with that of the experts!

Click on CONVENTION CARD to see bidding system

Good luck!

BOARD 1

South opens 2♠ (weak)

West East
(2♠) 2NT 3 
3  4 
All pass  

All roads lead to 4. There were two routes. Some Doubled with the West cards and some bid 2NT. I’ve included a 2NT auction mainly to highlight that in these auctions after 2NT we are still playing Stayman and Transfers. If East does transfer with 3 then it’s a question as to whether you play transfer breaks or not - if you do then West could/should break the transfer with whatever methods you have.

 

BOARD 2
West East
Pass
1  2 
2♠  3 
4  All pass

This hand is a lot easier to bid if East doesn’t open 2. We had three choices of opening bids for the East hand - Pass, 1 and 2. Clearly, depending on what partner has any of these could work out best, each bid having its pros and cons This, I think, is an important area for regular partnerships to discuss. This should ensure that there is a consistency of approach and a higher level of acceptance when one of the other approaches would have worked better on any given hand.

The auction I have given starts with a pass - those who passed thought the hand not enough for 1 and too good for 2 where it might prevent EW bidding a reasonable game - probably in Hearts. Over 1 - 2 its now decision time for West - her hand has clearly improved and despite only having 14 points - it’s a 5-loser hand with the fit in Diamonds (and possibly Hearts) established. On this basis 2♠ (showing reversing values) seems reasonable - 3 confirms the Heart fit and is stronger than jumping to 4 .

If anyone cares, I would have opened 2.

 

BOARD 3
West East
  1NT
3NT All pass

The EBU have decided that when we teach beginners to play that we open these sorts of hand 1NT rather than 1. This is one of the changes they have made in their latest version of the course. So staying on message I’ve opened 1NT - as did the vast majority of the panel. Most now simply bid 3NT with the West cards with a couple bemoaning the lack of a bid to ask for five card majors (over the 1NT opening). Such a bid is often 3♣ (i.e. 1NT - 3♣  asks partner whether she has a five card major or not). If this is in your system this would seem to be a moment to trot it out. If its not and you would open the East hand 1NT you should consider adding 3♣ or an equivalent.

 

BOARD 4
West East
  1NT
2♣  2 
3♠  4♠ 
All pass  

Hands four and eight explore how you develop hands after a 1NT opening. How do you differentiate between hands which are 5-4 in the majors or 5-5 in the majors? 

The auction I have given is consistent with the system card that emerges after the 2-year EBU course. i.e. 5-4 hands go via Stayman (and as you will see from hand 8,  5-5 hands go via transfers).

There are other ways of differentiating between 5-4 and 5-5 major suited hands over 1NT - the key (as always) is that you and partner have discussed it and agreed on a method.

 

BOARD 5

Assuming the aution starts 1♣ from East and 1 from West, North will overcall 1♠ and South will bid 4♠ 

West East
  1♣ 
1  (1♠) 3♣ 
(4♠) 6♣   

One of my students sent me this hand and asked me how to bid the grand slam. I told her it was very tough and, given the level of intervention from the opponents, virtually impossible. Only two of the panel bid 7♣ - both auctions show a very high level of trust in their partner. Almost everybody bid 3♣ over the 1♠ overcall and that certainly puts things on a better footing as West’s hand looks enormous after the 3♣ bid. 

I decided after 3♣  (which can’t be based mainly on a long solid Club suit as the 3♣  bidder doesn’t have ♣A)  I didn’t have the machinery to find out about all the cards I needed to find out about so bid something I thought must have a reasonable shot.

 

BOARD 6

North opens 2♠, South raises to 4♠ 

West  East
  (2♠) Pass
(4♠) 4NT 5 
All pass  

So this is from a summer league match. I held the West cards and bid 4NT (showing in principle both minors) and we played in a fairly grim 5 (very fortunate that someone didn’t double this). Recently, I’ve had two or three very similar hands and I’ve bid 4NT and rather wished I hadn’t. Given that madness is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result I was really beginning to question if I knew what I was doing in these sorts of auction so I’m grateful to the support from most of the panel for my action.  

Given that 4NT does show a two-suited hand - usually the minors - if you are not going to do it on this sort if hand when you have eleven cards in your two suits - when are you going to do it?

 

BOARD 7
West East
  1  
1♠  1NT
2♠  All pass

This is the closest we have come to a unanimous panel since I started this feature. We have established that 4441 hands are tough to bid. The 1NT rebid is not ideal but everyone bid it. Over 1NT, 2♠ typically shows a hand which would have opened a weak two in Spades.

 

 

BOARD 8
West East
1NT 2 
2♠  3 
4  All pass
As established in my comments to hand 4 - bidding the suits this way shows 5-5 in Hearts and Spades. Most of the panel decided this wasn’t a game hand so settled for 2 after trying Stayman. As I’ve said before I play mainly teams so as East I’m not playing this in a part score so drive us to 4.