Release 2.19r
0 0 0 0 0 0
Pages viewed in 2026
5th Tues Teams 30 June

The result now posted is as accurate as we can reconstruct. Masterpoints will apply, but it has not been possible to assign an NGS rating to the pairs involved. This is due to teething problems using the Teams scoring program for the first time with the new Bridgemates. This will be remedied before our next Teams match. Meanwhile, our apologies.

Recent Updates
5th Tues Teams 30 June
8th Jul 2026 07:59 BST
Jan-Jun 2026 HOTWs
7th Jul 2026 16:01 BST
Home Page
7th Jul 2026 11:56 BST
Q & A
Click on a title to view
Click on a title to view
  
  1. What do we know?   Steve Elliott on a critical moment in defence
  2. An opportunity to shine   Phil Green on an easily missed inference   Feedback below
  3. Trust your opponents   Richard Samter underestimates the opposition.
  4. Trust your opponents - and still get zero   Phil Green on the silliness of pairs
  5. Wanted: two tricks   but Roger Bendall only finds one ...
Feedback   Q&A 2: An opportunity to shine

Richard Samter writes:

The hand is interesting and the analysis accurate, but I think you missed a further reason to play the
A. It doesn't matter if West's K is singleton, as long as he has a second club. If K doesn't fall, you can return to dummy with K and then cash the last two spades, discarding diamonds. Declarer's hand is now high except for K.
Also, I don't like the lead. If East has
A or K,  declarer will (or should) be able to count the hand. A and another spade is less revealing, and might even give partner a ruff.

Richard Samter further writes:
I wrote the above a week or two ago, and it showed up a couple of interesting points.
The first is that I cannot count to three. I was in fact aware of this, but it's only fair to warn prospective partners of the fact. My suggested line only sets up two diamond discards, leaving a loser in each suit if the
K doesn't drop. The best line in that case is to play a low diamond to dummy and hope the J is allowed to hold. Two discards will then be enough to make the contract.
The second point is less clear-cut. Only one person (Phil) pointed out my error. This could be for a number of reasons:

  
• Nobody looks at the website
   • Those who do are too polite (or lazy) to comment on my counting ability
   •
They can't count either.