The "Results Analysis" feature has been added as a way of providing some further analysis of how you might have done, depending on whether you are a Declarer or Defender. It is open to interpretation.
Contract Analysis
From the Scorecard, each contract is analysed and an average of the percentages is created depending on whether you were Declarer, Dummy, Lead Defender, Other Defender.
So, if you are North, and played just 3 contracts, boards 11, 14 and 22 as "Declarer" all session
| Board |
Contract |
By |
Score |
IMPs |
% |
| 11 |
4S |
N |
+1 |
450 |
58% |
| 14 |
3NT |
N |
= |
400 |
42% |
| 22 |
2S |
N |
-1 |
50 |
32% |
These 3 contracts as declarer will be accumulated, such as the one above giving 58% , 42% and 32%, to give you an overall average as declarer of 44%. Your partner's % as Dummy would also be 44% .
| Player |
Played As |
Boards Played |
Average |
| Jim Smith |
Declarer |
3 |
44% |
| |
Dummy |
8 |
45% |
| |
On Lead |
6 |
26% |
| |
Defender |
7 |
42% |
It is only meant as a guide, how many you played and whether you did well in Play or Defence. With this analysis, Bridgewebs cannot determine whether the reason you did well/badly was because you overbid or because you didn't make the tricks you could have.
With Single Winner arrow switched movements or Howell, there is nothing recorded in the Scoring Software to say which seat you sat in for each board, so Bridgewebs makes assumptions.
The first assumption is that the first player of a pair sits North or East. This is correct if the club use Wireless scoring.
|