Dear ACBL Member,

As the ACBL has started using a cheating-detection system for online bridge – EDGAR – I have heard from many of you, and I understand your concerns.

Please keep in mind that the ACBL is obliged to defend the integrity of the online play environment, and the majority of our players – those who don’t engage in collusive cheating – must be protected.

EDGAR is simply a tool for flagging suspicious activity. It keeps a running score of bidding, play and defensive decisions made by players in ACBL-sanctioned contests. The higher the EDGAR score, the greater the likelihood a player is engaging in collusive cheating. This tool has been repeatedly tested by independent experts, and we are confident in its results.

The sample of deals used by EDGAR, typically in the thousands, compares the rate of a specific player’s success to the expected success of an expert player on the same deals. If the player under investigation consistently outperforms experts, then collusive cheating is strongly indicated; EDGAR’s accuracy exceeds 99.9%.

It is important to note that these cases are confidential prior to resolution. Only the Office of the National Recorder may discuss any ongoing or pending case, and they may only discuss the case with the charged party or their advocate. Charged parties who wish to contest the findings may do so before an independent arbitration panel.

I know that it’s upsetting when someone we know is accused of cheating. In the face-to-face setting, collusive cheating is rare, so many find it hard to believe that their friends would cheat online. However, the evidence is clear.

Thank you for your attention to this issue. Know that we are also always reviewing the way we do business and working to improve and do appreciate your feedback.

Sincerely,

Bronia Jenkins
ACBL Executive Director