Release 2.19q
BRIDGE AT STANSFIELD

 Bridge at Stansfield

Wednesdays 1.45pm for 2pm Learn & Play Village Hall

Thursdays 6.45pm for 7pm at the Village Hall


Save The Date!!

Members Summer Party - Thursday 4th July 5.45pm for 6pm

Sign up form will appear soon but do put this in your diary!


HOW TO FIND A PARTNER

Finding a club member as a partner has been made much easier. Click on PLAY and then hover your mouse over the session you would like to play in  and click the Partner Required symbol. If you are new to the area we would love to hear from you please click INFORMATION for more details, and contact information.


 

 

Results
Thursday Pairs
Director: Paddy
Scorer: Peter
Thursday Pairs
Director: Paddy
Scorer: Peter
Thursday Pairs
Director: Jackie
Scorer: Paddy
Thursday Pairs
Director: Dave
Scorer: Paddy
Thursday Pairs
Director: Jackie
Scorer: Peter
Thursday Pairs
Director: Jackie
Scorer: Dave
Thursday Pairs
Director: Paddy
Scorer: Peter
Thursday Pairs
Director: Jackie
Scorer: Peter
Thursday Pairs
Director: Dave
Scorer: Peter
Thursday Pairs
Director: Jackie
Scorer: Peter
0 0 0 0 0 0
Pages viewed in 2024
Hand of the Week
Slam No 1

The bidding is right out of the text book.

The all-important rebid by South shows a balanced hand of 15-16 points. North now knows there are enough points for a small slam...and should bid it straight away.

Slam No 2

Not quite so straightforward, but once West opens the bidding, East (with 20pts!) knows the partnership must end up in a small slam - at least.

A slightly more exotic - and riskier - bidding sequence might be 1♣ -1 - 3 - 4NT* - 5♦** - 5NT - 6♠ - 7 !!

* = Roman Key Card Blackwood (asking how many of 5 key cards - 4 Aces and K of trumps)

** = one of 5 key cards

GERRY'S LUNCH - HAND 19

'Only" 21pts...but you don't get many hands more powerful than that held by East on board 19 at Gerry's lunch.

After South, West and North pass, East opens 2♣ and partner responds 2 Then what?

My partner bid 6 straight away (I tried my best to conceal my horror!) Others blasted away to 6 Some took a more leisurely approach.

Either way, 7 and 7 are easily made.

29 AUGUST 2013
JUMP bids in a new suit are relatively rare - and rightly so because they take up valuable bidding space which can hinder a partnership reaching the right contract.

So when are they valid? If, as Opener, you have a hand like this  3  AKJ104  AQJ5  KJ3 you open 1 and partner responds 1.
You need a way to show you have got a monster hand so a jump bid in a new suit - 3 - does the trick. Partner now knows you have 19+ points and, with even the most modest of hands, will ensure game is reached and, with extra points, may explore the possibility of a slam.

On Thursday night, another example cropped up where a jump bid in a new suit was invaluable and enabled three pairs to reach a slam.

On Board 9, North opens 1 with the intention or re-bidding No Trumps at the lowest level over partner's bid (unless Partner supports spades).

However, Responder has the perfect hand for a jump bid - 3 - in a new suit, thereby showing 16+ points and a near solid 6+ card suit. (Near solid, or self-supporting, means 6+ cards with a maximum of one loser).

North now knows the partnership has a minimum of 32 points and, gIven his A, six tricks in clubs. North should not need a lot of persuasion to bid 6NT.

Well done to Derek & Rita and Jacque & Pauline who bid and made 6NT.

WHO were the heroes of Thursday night?
Step forward Steve and Paul, who have been playing for little more than a a year and produced a career best effort to finish second - and provided a priceless piece of humour in the process.
On a chilly evening, the pair were sitting in a corner near one of the heaters and as Bridget and I sat down to play against them I commented it was probably the warmest part of the room.
"You're warm because of the pressure of playing against us," said Steve, tongue in cheek (I think!)
There is nothing like confidence in any sport and they demonstrated it in trumps (sorry) when they secured a top on board 15...
I know not how the bidding went, but I assume it was something like as set out.
After South opens 1 West overcalls 1. With five points but five cards in partner's suit, North scrapes together a bid of 2. East, with five card support for partner's overcall, correctly 'bids the fit' and goes 4♠.
Decision time has arrived for South. With no defence to 4and a powerful hand, he bids 5which is doubled by the opposition.
But the contract is never in doubt. With 11 trumps, play the Ace and the two others fall; trump two losing clubs in dummy and, at worst, lose two diamonds - for a blinding top.
Easy game and, doubtless, Lucie and Pat will be asking for tips from this duo...
17 JANUARY 2013
WHO says teachers don't get things wrong...
WHEN partner opens 2 promising 23+pts I still get excited - and so do most players - especially when you don't have to reply 2 (0-7pts).
With nine points but no five card suit opposite my partner's huge hand, I bid 2NT. She re-bid 3...now what?
Foolishly, I went for the 'agricultural' form of bidding and reasoned that with 32pts minimum between us and at least eight diamonds 6NT was far more preferable to 6.
Within seconds I was paying a painful price as Bridget led the A - felling the K in dummy - and then  proceeded to play the Q. One down - and a bottom for us as other partnerships sailed into an easy to make 6or even 6
Grrrrrr...
10 JANUARY 2013
A fascinating set of boards on Thursday and several merit coming under the Hand of the Week microscope.
However, rather than concentrate on one board I am going to devote the space to Weak Twos and, in particular, defending against such a bid by Opponents...
When we learn bridge, Strong Twos are taught so we open 2 2 or 2 with an unbalanaced hand and 20-22pts.
But more experienced players invariably play Weak Twos - which are like a mini pre-empt. Typically, a player will open 2 2 or 2♦ with a six card suit, including a couple of honours, and less than opening points... something like this:
 KQ10952 Q54 852
The reason is simple. Strong Twos do not come along very often...whereas you often get a hand where you can open a Weak Two. And, perhaps, most important of all - Weak Twos can really muck up the opposition by stopping them from bidding or by preventing them from reaching their ultimate contract.
That was definitely the case on Thursday night where 'Weak Twoers' were in their element and a number of players asked me what they should do when the Opposition open a Weak Two. So here goes...
You have five options:
1 Double - if you have opening points and the right shaped hand (4441 or one away from it) for a take-out double
2 Overcall Suit - if you have 10-18pts and a high quality 5+ card suit
3 Overcall NTs - 15-18pts and a good 'stopper' in their suit - bid 2NT
4 If you have a 'monster' hand - 19+pts - double with any shaped hand and if you do not like the suit  your partner bids, bid your own suit (or NTs) thereby showing you have a very big hand
5 Pass - disappointing...but sometimes you have no other option.
3 JANUARY 2013
HAND 7 picks itself as Hand of the Week, given its unusual shape. It certainly caused a few problems and  contributed to the success of Marcus and Chris who secured a joint top after successfully doubling the opposition's 6NT.
I have to admit if I had been South I would have been sorely tempted to drive my partner into 6NT or 6 neither of which should make.
So top marks to Sarah, who bid 3NT as North, and to Anna, who showed admirable restraint in passing...

With a J lead, North can rattle off 10 tricks - for what turned out to be a joint top.
If, instead, East cashes the ace and king of hearts, he has then got to find the highly unlikely switch to the ♣4 in order to find two more winners.
27 DECEMBER 2012
There were plenty of tricky part-score contracts on Thursday. Board 23 was one of the exceptions, where a small slam could be bid and made - in hearts or NTs - but somehow it evaded everyone...
With a balanced hand and 17pts, South opens 1 with the intention of re-bidding No-Trumps and after partner responds 1 duly goes 2NT (to show 17-18pts). North now knows the partnership has a minimum of 32pts and is very much in the 'slam zone.' So what next?
My preferred choice is for North to bid 3♠ (thereby showing a 5-4 shape in the two major suits). South now knows the partnership has an eight card fit in hearts and duly bids 4. North now bids 4NT, asking for aces, and yet again those who play Roman Key Card Blackwood are at a big advantage. South's reply of 5♠ promises two of the five key cards (the five key cards are the four aces plus the king of trumps) and, crucially, the Queen of trumps.
North now knows the partnership has four of the five key cards + the queen of trumps and can happily bid 6 which should make easily enough (trump one club in dummy and throw the other two losing clubs on winning spades after you have drawn trumps).
North does have another option after the opening sequence of 1-1-2NT. Knowing that the partnership has a minimum of 32pts, he takes the view that his five card suit, including the 10, enables him to upgrade his hand and bid 6NT (which, on a likely club lead, also whizzes in).
20 DECEMBER 2012
CAN you look at Board 21 for Hand of the Week, a player from Thursday night emailed on Friday morning. (Please keep suggestions coming. It is much better if you, rather than me, pick a board of interest).
And Board 21 is definitely of interest...
North opens 1 and the first thought that should cross South's mind is that the partnership has 30+ points and so should, at the very least, investigate the possibility of a slam - with South (who, unlike North at this stage, knows about the massive points tally) asking the questions.
What should South bid?
My preference is for 2 although some might argue in favour 3 - a 'jump-shift' promising 16+pts as Responder and a near solid 6+ card suit (I prefer to jump-shift only when I know what trumps are going to be).
Back to North who has 15pts and six hearts. However, because of the quality of the suit - a sequence including the 10 and 9 - I would upgrade its value and re-bid 3.
South is now going to get very excited but what should be bid, with no fit in hearts? Given the strength of the hand, 4NT is probably the best choice.
If a partnership play 'ordinary' Blackwood, a response of 5 will locate the missing two Aces. For those playing Roman Key Card Blackwood, a reply of 5♣ promises 0 or 3 of the 5 'key' cards (4 aces + the King of trumps).
Either way, South should now be able to bid 6NT with confidence. I can think of some who might even punt 7NT...which only makes because the missing ♣Q is in e right place.
I do not pretend this is the only way to reach a slam...but the key is for South to be in the driving seat after partner opens the bidding.

WEAK JUMP OVERCALLS

This was the second board of the day at the Suffolk Teams of Four on Sunday - and it advertised in splendid style the nuisance value of weak jump overcalls.

East opened 1 and my partner (Celia) immediately bid 3 - a weak jump overcall (WJO) promising at least six diamonds. (Althogh she had seven diamondfs, the hand did not have the quality for a pre-emptive 4 overcall)

West bid 3♠. I now had a choice. I could bid 4 (bidding the fit) or even 5 to try to make life difficult for East, or I could pass. As we were vulnerable and my hand was horribly flat (offering partner little chance of any trumping in dummy), I opted (unusually for me!) to pass...

East had a very long think and finally....passed. West duly made all 13 tricks for an unusual score of +260.

However, our partners (Paul & Bridget playing EW at another table) encountered no such difficulties and sailed into 6 - making - to give us a huge swing.

* If you do play weak jump-overcalls, what should partner do with a good hand (15+pts) after partner has made a WJO?

Answer: exactly the same as when partner opens a weak two - bid 2NT - seeking the strength of partner's WJO...to see if game is on.

QUACK, QUACK!!

'DUCKING' - withholding a high card that would win a trick - is a useful ploy when Declaring (and defending) in No Trump contracts and Board 22 on Tuesday showed why.

After a straightforward auction, E leads a fourth highest ♠ 5, followed by ♠ 4 and ♠ Q from W. Declarer ducks and plays the ♠ 3.

W correctly continues with the ♠ K. What should N do now?

Answer: Duck again!

Look what happens if Declarer wrongly rises with the ♠ A on the second trick or, even worse, on the first trick.

North has seven top tricks (5 in ♣ s, one  and one ♠ ). To try to make his contract he must force out the  A, to garner three  tricks). However, when E wins the  A, he  cashes three ♠ tricks and Declarer is soon one off.

However, if N ducks the second ♠ , all is well. E is forced to lead another suit and it matters not which suits he picks. Declarer is home and dry. Try it...

So if you are forced to duck while playing a No-Trump contract because you only have one 'stopper' it is usually worth ducking twice in order to sever communications between your opponents.

QUACK, QUACK!!

Board 2 provided South with 30 points at the club on Tuesday - the biggest hand ever in the history of the club.

Although a contract of 6 was makeable it was virtually impossible to bid it.

After South opened 2♣ it is rumoured that one partner had a momentary lapse of concentration and announced 'weak'!

Not quite...

WHEN DID POINTS EVER MATTER?!

A 5 point slam after some very dubious bidding...

Trump the likely A lead. Your only hope is to lay down the A. Bingo! The trump Q and K fall. Now set about making the club suit good, by trumping a club in dummy, trumping something to get back to you hand, trump another club etc until the opposition run out and your remaining clubs are winners!

SPEND THE MONEY WISELY, MR BOND...

Legend has it that this probably was a rigged hand dealt to the son of George III, resulting in the loss of a £20,000 wager.  It is better known as the hand used in the James Bond movie, Moonraker, against the villain Drax, in which Bond won a £15,000 bet.

Trump whatever is led (probably the J). As Declarer, you have to play East (who doubled you) for the missing clubs. So play a small club from dummy and cover East's club as cheaply as possible. Trump another diamond in dummy (the A and K having both fallen) and finesse clubs again. Cash the A and Q and all the other diamonds are winners!

6 DECEMBER 2012
Board 13, in which NS had 32 points, resulted in an array of different contracts - some making, some not - but no-one bid and made a slam. Was there a way?
The bidding could go a number of different ways, depending on the (in)experience of partnerships.
After North opens 1 South can show the strength of his hand by jumping in a new suit to 3. North rebids 3 and now South must make a choice. More experienced Souths will bid 3 (4th suit forcing which says nothing about hearts but is saying to partner 'we are going to game (at least) tell me more about your hand.') In which case North will rebid diamonds, to show the 5-5 shape of his hand. South can then decide to bid 6 or 6NT. Less experienced Souths might bid 6NT straight away.
Is it makeable?
With hearts the only suit not to have been bid (South's 3 promises nothing about hearts) West is highly likely to lead the 5. South wins with the Ace (or 10, should East play the 7 in order to keep his king over Dummy's Queen).
Now South must attack the Spades and play the A followed by the 6. West can win the K but is powerless to do anything else. Declarer can win whatever is returned and has three spade winners on which he can throw club losers, five winning diamonds and a winning heart. Small slam made.
Only one pair - Judy and Robin - managed to bid and make 6♦ on board 19. Players who use Splinters should have found the contract...
What is a splinter bid?
It is an unnecessary jump in a new suit which shows four card support for the suit bid by partner, game going values and, crucially, a singleton or void in the suit bid. The convention enables partnerships to find slams with far fewer than 30 points because of the shape of their hands.
With board 19, South opens 1 and North has the ideal hand for a splinter bid (four card support for partner's suit, just five losing tricks - and a void in hearts).
West is likely to overcall 1 in which case North bids 3 (if West bids 2, a weak jump over all, North bids 4)
The key decision for South revolves round his heart holding. With shortage in the suit or wasted values, such as queens and jacks, he would not be interested in a slam - but an Ace and two small cards - which can be trumped in dummy - are ideal). South bids 4NT and Norths playing Roman Key Card Blackwood will respond 5 showing two of the five key cards (the A and the King of trumps).
With that information, South can confidently bid 6 
Splinters and RKCB are two of the most useful conventions around when it comes to slam bidding - but are best learnt after you have been playing for 18 months to two years.
1 November 2012
KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid - is a useful bridge acronym which often pays off, especially when you are playing with a new partner for the first time.
Edward and Zadie may not know many of the bridge conventions yet (heaven help the rest of us when they do!) and some simple bidding on board 4 saw them reap handsome dividends...
West opens 1NT with a balanced 14 points and those Easts who have not learnt Stayman bid 2NT with 11pts, inviting partner to go to game - which West accepts.
On a likely club lead, Declarer wins with the ♣Q - and then attacks the Hearts.
With nine cards in the suit, including the A and K, the best ploy is to go for the 'drop - ie hoping the Opposition's four cards will 'drop' under the Ace and King. Bingo! It works...add on three spade tricks, the ♣A and a probably diamond winner - 11 tricks.
KISS!
18 October 2012
Two Hands of the Week are on offer, both of them involving slams - one of which was straight out of a bridge text book while the other was riskier...
Firstly, the text book slam on board 1.
East opens 1 and West should immediately be thinking in terms of a slam. Some Wests will launch into Blackwood straight away. Others might prefer a splinter bid of 4 (promising a minimum of four card spade support, game going values and, critically, either a void or singleton in diamonds). More experienced Easts will cue bid hearts (showing first round control), leaving West to bid 4NT. For those playing Roman Key Card Blackwood the response by East of 5 promises two out of the five 'key' cards (the five 'key' cards are the four aces and the King of trumps) + the Queen of trumps...which allows West to bid 6 and the contract should never be in doubt.
18 October 2012
The second slam involved board 13. North opens 1NT, which leaves South scratching his or head as to what to do....
Although South has 'only' 14pts, it is a massive hand given the void in hearts and seven card club suit headed by the Ace and King.
With game values at least, South should prefer 3NT to 5 (partner should have cover in spades and hearts) because with overtricks likely, that will score better.
But should South be more adventurous? You know partner has a minimum of two clubs, so there is a very good chance there will be no losers in that suit and, with a bit of luck, North's points should give you cover in hearts and spades...
it is a bit of a punt, but the odds are that 6 will make.
With West on lead, the K plays straight into declarer's hands, taking the trick with Dummy's Ace while throwing away a losing spade from his own hand. Then it is plain sailing....draw trumps, cash the diamond winners and just give up a spade at the end.
Of course, if East had been on lead it would have been a different story...
11 October 2012
GRAND, as opposed to small, slams are something of a rarity - especially with as few as 26 points - but board five offered an opportunity for more advanced players on Thursday night. How...

East opens 1 and repeats the suit after West responds 2. With a nine card spade fit and a great side suit (hearts) West bids 4NT. 
With 'Ordinary' Blackwood, East will repsond 5,  showing one ace and West is likely to bid 6.  However partnerships which play Roman Key Card Blackwood (a must for people who have done the Advanced course) are able to find out much more following the 4NT request. East responds 5 which promises two Key Cards (an Ace and the King of Trumps) and the Queen of trumps.
With that information, West can bid 7 with some confidence because he knows the partnership has all the Aces, all the top trumps and an amazing side suit which East should be able to 'make good' and use to throw away losers from his hand.
20 September 2012
SUE and Mary kicked everyone off the proverbial park on Thursday and hand 13 was a typical example where they got the upper hand by making 11 tricks in a 4 contract while others made 10 - or less.

How did they do it....
Most partnerships found 4 without too much difficulty and after East leads the singleton club, Declarer wins with the Ace and quickly draws trumps. There is always going to be a spade loser, but the key is the play with the diamonds.
Play the Q, with the intention of 'running' it (ie throwing away the 7). If East plays the A, return to hand when you regain the lead and play a small diamond towards the 10. If East plays the J, take it with the king, and you 10 and 9 are winners. If Wast ducks, win the the 10, cash the King...Either way you only lose one diamond and 11 tricks are made.
30 August 2012

Instead of the usual Hand of the Week...something different.

Jackie passed on a recent article by Tony Forrester, the bridge columnist in the Daily Telegraph, which is not only illuminating - but applicable to players of all standards.

30 August 2012

STAYMAN is probably the best know bridge convention – and is used after partner has opened 1NT, 2NT or overcalled 1NT in an attempt to find an eight card fit in a major suit.


However, there is one occasion when players should resist using Stayman despite partner having opened or overcalled the requisite NTs – and the exception cropped up on Thursday night with board 16.


If you have got a flat 4(s or s)333 hand, resist the temptation to bid Stayman (2 opposite 1NT or 3 opposite 2NT) and, providing you have sufficient points, support partner in NTs.


East opened 2NT and with a flat 4()333 hand and seven points West should bid 3NT – which trots up.


The reason for avoiding using Stayman with a 4333 shape opposite a NT hand is simple. It will play better in NTs than trumps (where you won't have any trumping potential in dummy and will find it tough to get rid of losers...as Declarers in 4 on board 16 found to their cost)

26 July 2012 - 1

HANDS of the Week are like policemen. You don't see one for ages – then two turn up.

Board 4 on Thursday evening was particularly interesting. Several pairs reached 4 but only Denise and John managed to collect 12 tricks – for an outright top.

Let's start with the play. East is likely to lead the K before probably switching to a trump, which suits Declarer fine. He can either draw trumps before throwing a losing heart and a losing diamond from hand on winning clubs in dummy – or trump some diamonds in dummy first. Either way, 12 tricks are there for the taking.

But is 6biddable? Actually, it is for more advanced players...courtesy of a Splinter bid. A Splinter bid is made after a partnership have located an eight card 'fit' and involves making a double jump in another suit in which you have a void or singleton.

South opens 1, North bids 1and even if East overcalls with a punchy 2, South (with four card support for spades) has to decide if he is strong enough to bid 4 (showing four card support for partner's suit, a void or singleton in diamonds and interest in a slam). With six losing tricks and only 14pts it is questionable if South's hand is strong enough, but I can imagine several players doing it. North can then see a way of trumping his losing diamonds and is likely to accept the challenge of reaching 6and making a small slam with just 24pts!!

26 July 2012 - 2

We all love bidding – and making – slams, so well done John and Gillie who were the only pair to reach 6NT on board 9.

After North passes, East opens 2NT with a balanced 20-22 pts. With 11 pts West should investigate the possibility of reaching a small slam. With a balanced hand, the best option is to bid 4NT (not asking for Aces, but requesting parter to bid 6NT if he is towards the upper end of his points range - or to pass if not).

With 21pts, East is slap bang in the middle but the five card heart suit makes the difference.

South is likely to lead the Q (top of an internal sequence), but Declarer can win with the K and, with careful play, make all 13 tricks. The kind splits in in clubs and spades enables Delcarer to throw a losing heart from his hand on a winning spade in dummy and a losing diamond on a winning club.

14 June 2012

Hand 9 from last week could have come straight out of a bridge teaching manual on how to play a no-trump hand...but as a number of pairs did not make 3NT it is worth looking at...

After North opens 1NT, South will bid 2NT (or 2 - Stayman – asking North if he has a four card major suit). Either way, the partnership should end up in 3NT.

East is hardly spoilt for choice when it comes to the opening lead and will opt (probably) for the 5.

North should now count his 'top' or winning tricks - A, AKQ, AK – six in total.

Where will the extra tricks come from?

Well, he is guaranteed to make one out of the J or Q. But the eight card diamond suit is the one declarer must concentrate on immediately after getting the lead. With QJ1097654, all Declarer has to do is knock out the A and K held by the opposition and nine or even 10 tricks are there for the making. With good stoppers in every other suit, there is no danger of the defenders winning the battle to make good their longest suit.

So win the heart lead with the Q, and play the 10. West will win with the A but Declarer can win whatever suit he returns and then force out the K.

The hard work is done. Now declarer can even start to think about making an overtrick...with spades.

Lead and run the J, which loses to the K. When you get the lead play the 4 and play the 9 from dummy (If East inserts the 10 win with the Q and your 9 has been promoted into a winner.)

Well done to Joan and Keith who were alone in making 10 tricks.

24 May 2012

Fi and Jilly scored an outright top when they found the unbeatable contract of 3NT on a tricky-to-bid board 16 on Thursday while several pairs went off in 4..

West has a dreaded 4441 hand and with 14pts should open 1 (the higher ranking of the two four card minor suits) and East duly bids 1. Most Wests are now going to tell a slight 'porkie' and re-bid 1NT despite being a point short. Whereupon most Easts, with six spades, are going to re-bid 4, believing – quite understandably - the partnership has an eight card fit.

Fi and Jilly managed to avoid what turns out to be an elephant trap and negotiated their way into 3NT which rolls home without too much fuss (five tricks, two tricks, 3 tricks – the finesse is onside – and even a trick).

The four partnerships who ended up in 4went off despite the contract looking makeable...at first glance.

How many losing tricks does Declarer (East) have? One spade (provided Declarer plays a small card towards the Jack in dummy - or 'runs' the Jack if leading from dummy), one heart, possibly three diamonds (in practice two because the A is on-side) and possibly one club.

The key is to play on the hearts as soon as possible and then dump two losing diamonds from Declarer's hand on the promoted hearts in dummy. Contract made - if the defence allow you the chance.

Smart defence will see South lead the A (with the intention of hopefully ruffing a diamond from partner later on) followed by the 6.  Declarer wins with the K but it doesn't matter whether he decides to tackle trumps or set up his hearts - as trouble looms. If Declarer 'runs' the J South wins with the Q and then switches to a . North wins and cashes the Q before playing a fourth diamond. If Declarer ruffs high (with the 10, for example) South's 9 is promoted into a winner. If, after winning the K, Declarer opts instead to set up the hearts, North wins and plays two diamonds. Same result..

Two down. Ouch!

17 May 2012

Making overtricks really counts in duplicate pairs and two partnerships – Mary & Jackie and John & Peter – made it pay on Board 15 on Thursday...

After West opens 1 partner responds 1 and Opener re-bids 2 - to show their 5-4 shape – before Responder bids 2. This is Fourth Suit Forcing, a convention which says to partner: 'We have the necessary points for game – tell me more about your hand.' (It does not promise anything in the suit bid – in this case hearts).

With good cover in the 'fourth suit,' West is happy to bid 2NT and East goes 3NT.

With a likely heart lead from North, West can count seven 'top' tricks and with nine diamonds should be looking to that suit for the 'extras.'

So, win the heart lead and prepare to 'run' the 10. If it is covered by North's J, play the Q, cash the A. 'Unblock' the clubs by playing the A...then play another diamond. North wins the diamonds but West wins whatever is returned and cashes two more diamonds.

With North likely to protect their Q and South protecting spades, clubs are likely to be discarded in both hands – presenting Declarer with an all important overtrick.


12 April 2012

Sorry partner, we should have been in a slam...” will have been said by several players sitting North-South on Thursday after they saw the scores on Board 10.


How should North-South reach 6?

BEGINNERS/IMPROVERS: After South opens 1, North knows the partnership has a fit and sufficient points for game. Ideally a pair needs 30-32 points to be in the 'slam zone' and trigger investigating the possibility of bidding six of a suit. North has 'only' 14 points (so the partnership may have as few as 26 points), but his hand is much stronger than that – for two reasons. The singleton spade means South may be able to trump losing spades in dummy AND the wonderful diamond side suit is another way South may be able to get rid of losers. So North should bid 4NT (Blackwood) over the 1 opening bid, asking partner how many aces he has. When South replies 5, promising three aces, North can confidently bid 6.

ADVANCED PLAYERS: After South opens 1, North should realise (with a trump fit and only five losing tricks) a slam is likely to be on. Some players will bid 4NT and if you play Roman Key Card Blackwood (a must!) partner will respond 5 (promising zero or three of the FIVE – four Aces and the King of trumps – key cards). North should assume it is zero and bid 5 and South (who realises partner has assumed zero key cards) raises it to 6.

If a partnership has Splinters (an invaluable Slam bidding tool) in their bidding armoury, the auction will be different. After the opening 1, North has the ideal hand for a Splinter bid (promising 4+card support for Partner's suit, game+ values and a singleton or void in the Splinter suit), so bids 3(the unnecessary jump in the suit sginifies it is a Splinter bid). South has the perfect holding in spades to take advantage so bids 4NT. North responds 5 , promising two key cards – the A and K. With all five key cards, South can happily bid 6 - and should make all 13 tricks.

22 March 2012

Plenty of tricky part scores on Thursday, but one hand of particular interest was board 17.

North opens 1 and most Easts are going to pitch in with 2, given the favourable vulnerability.


With four card support for partner's opening bid, South is going to support the hearts – but to what level?

Points alone take you to 2 but the singleton club increases the power of your hand – to 3 or 4?

There are no such problems if you have learnt the invaluable Losing Trick Count. South adds his seven losers to Opener's assumed seven losers and, hey-presto, subtracts the total from 18 to bid 4.

A couple of Wests were tempted to sacrifice with 5 or 6 (ouch!) . With a flat hand and only 10 clubs, five losers are unavoidable against best defence – expensive when doubled (Two off doubled – -300 - would be a good result).

The excellent number of Norths who finished in 4 had little to fear with just two losers – a and a .

15 March 2012

TELLING 'porkies' to partner can be dangerous, but occasionally stretching the rules can be be profitable – and that was definitely the case with board 15 on Thursday...

WITH an unbalanced hand and 20-22 points, technically South should open 2 (if playing Strong Twos) but how about opening 2NT instead? With excellent stoppers in hearts and clubs, it is probably a better bet – particularly for those who play Weak Twos and otherwise would have to open 1

Depending on the conventions you play or don't play, the bidding can go a number of different ways. With Transfers, North will bid 3 asking partner to bid 3. Given the powerful shape of North's hand (and only 7 losing tricks opposite 20-22 points - equivalent to 5 losing tricks), North could then either cue bid clubs (showing first round control in that suit), splinter in spades (showing a singleton or void in spades) or just bid 4NT, asking for Aces. With Roman Key Card Blackwood (four aces + king of trumps) South will replay 5 - promising three key cards. With two key cards in his hand (A and K), North can bid 6

Making the contract should not take much effort for South. The best way, given the strength of hearts in North's hand, is to make dummy good. Play off the A and K before trumping the 2 with the 2. Play the A, the A, trump a spade, cash the K and the rest is plain sailing.

8 March 2012

Well done to the three pairs – Sue & Robert, Wendy & Michael, Pauline & Jacque – who bid and made 6 on board 12. How did they do it?

West opens 1 and East responds 2. The fireworks begin when West re-bids 2to show his 5-4 shape. East now has every reason to get excited, knowing that the partnership has an 8 card fit. If you have learnt the Losing Trick Count, it is a 'no-brainer' for East to investigate the possibility of a slam. With just five LTs East (assuming the Opener has 7 LTs) can bid 4NT, asking for Aces. When West replies 5 - two Aces if you play ordinary Blackwood; two of the five key cards without the Queen of trumps if you play Roman Key Card Blackwood - East will bid 6. If you have not learnt the Losing Trick Count, East should still be thinking in terms of a slam given the 16 point hand and excellent shape – the singleton .

The trickiest lead for Delarer is a diamond. (A club lead gifts East a cheap trick and a trump lead means Declarer does not have to guess where the missing Q is placed).

Win the diamond lead and trump a diamond in dummy, play a small trump to the 10 (phew!) and trump another diamond in dummy. Draw the remaining trumps, cash the K and the 9 (throwing a club from dummy). Cross over to the A and try the finesse. It doesn't work, but that is the only losing trick.

1 March 2012

Thursday's set of boards was the most interesting and challenging for a number of weeks. Board 16 - where game with overtricks was available despite the partnership having only 19 points - saw Tony and Peter enjoy a joint top on their way to victory...

North opens 1(with 5-5 in and always open the higher ranking suit – as opposed to opening 1 when you have 4-4 in and ). South does not have enough points to go 2 so has to bid 1NT. North now shows his second suit by bidding 2 and suddenly South's hand comes alive. With seven losing tricks, South happily bids 4 (If you have not learnt the Losing Trick Count...the void in Spades enables you to bid two levels higher than your points take you).

East leads the A and North has everything required for a classic cross-ruff – good trumps, side suit winners plus a void or shortage in a suit in both hands.

Declarer trumps the A in dummy, cashes the A (throwing the 4 from his own hand) cashes the A andK (if you don't cash your side suit winners early on, the opposition may throw away cards in those suits and end up trumping your Ace and King)...then merrily trumps his remaining spades in dummy, and trumps dummy's diamonds in his own hand. The only trick the opposition make is the A! 12 tricks made – with just 19 points.

16 February 2012

CONGRATULATIONS to the two pairs who bid and made 6 with board 13 last week. When East opens the bidding (using the rule of 20) with 1, those sitting West, with 21 points, can hardly believe their luck. But what next?

WEST should realise straightaway a slam should be on, given partner has opened the bidding, but the first priority is to see whether the pair has a fit in a suit. West bids 1 and when East replies 1 the partnership is in business. Now West can bid 4NT, asking for Aces. If the partnership plays Roman Key Card Blackwood (5 'Key' Cards – the four Aces and the King of Trumps), East will reply 5 promising two 'Key' cards, without the Queen of trumps. If the partnership is using ordinary Blackwood, East will reply 5 promising one Ace. Either way, West should not need much persuasion to bid 6.

When dummy goes down, it is not all plain sailing for Declarer as the Queen of trumps is missing together with the K.

The lazy option is to go for two finesses and hope one of them works. But there is a much better way to proceeed – and it involves the side suit of clubs.

Win whatever South leads (a diamond is best) and cash the Ace and King of trumps. Play the A and K, throwing away the two remaining losing diamonds in Declarer's hand - and then tackle clubs. Play off the A and K, ending up in Declarer's hand. Now trump a club (removing the opposition's last club) and return to Declarer's hand by trumping the 9. Now play another club and throw away and J, play another club and throw away the 10. It makes no difference if South trumps the club with the outstanding Q. Small slam made.

9 February 2012

There is nothing particularly exciting about Board 12 from Thursday evening, but those Wests who reached 4 through sensible bidding – and then set about removing the oppostion's trumps – were rewarded with a particularly good score. It just goes to underline how consistent play - and avoiding costly blunders - is the key to success.

After West opens 1, East goes 2. West repeats the spades to show six of the suit and now East (with seven losing tricks and a known spade fit) can bid game.

The likely Q lead needs to be won in dummy so Declarer can attack the trumps with the aim of 'running' the 7. In the event, South plays the Q and Declarer cashes the A before playing the 10. Norths who mistakenly played their J were quickly made to regret their decision when partner plays the K. If North correctly plays a low spade, Declarer ignores the outstanding J when regaining the lead and concentrates on the diamond side suit with a view to throwing a losing heart on a diamond when the suit is established.

The best the opposition can do is win two spades and a diamond.

2 February 2012

After concentrating on conventions and bidding in recent weeks, Hand 1 on Thursday is of interest – for defensive reasons.

Most EW pairs got into 4. West opens 1 and whether East replies 2 or 3 West is not going to need much persuasion (with a shapely hand and five losing tricks) to go to game. Three pairs made the contract (one of them doubled!)...but the correct defence should stop them.

Most Norths are (rightly) going to lead the Q, whick wins the trick. Now what?

The key is to look at Dummy (East) and see that with a void created in diamonds Declarer is almost certainly going to take advantage and trump diamonds in dummy. SO LEAD A TRUMP to reduce the number of times Declarer can do it.

Now Declarer is in trouble. He can trump three diamonds in dummy but no longer has any trumps left to trump a losing club. As a result he can only make nine tricks.

If the opposition does not lead a trump (either after winning the first trick or when they win their heart trick), Declarer will make the contract because he has everything required for a cross ruff. He can trump three diamonds in dummy and still has a trump left in dummy to deal with a losing club.

26 January 2012

Few conventions are more useful than the Unassuming Cue Bid and perhaps that explains why it is Andrew Robson's (and my) favourite. The UCB, taught in my Advanced course, comes in to play after your partner has overcalled a suit. If you have a minimum of three cards in your partner's suit (and therefore an 8+ card fit) and 10+ points you bid the opposition suit to show partner the strength of your hand.

It paid handsome dividends on Board 18 on Thursday...

East open 1 and South overcalls 2. West passes and North (with three cards support in diamonds and 10pts) bids 2. Most Easts are going to pass. South (with 15pts) realises there are enough points for game, so bids 3 with a view to trying to get the partnership into 3NT. North with stoppers in the two other suit obliges. The two Norths who bid 3NT were rewarded with 10 tricks and a joint top.

19 January 2012

Conventions are keys which enable players to reach contracts which natural bidding often finds hard to achieve. Stayman, for example, enables a partnership to locate an 8 card fit in a mjaor suit after one player has opened 1NT or 2NT or overcalled 1NT.

There are a number of 'must have' conventions which players require as they become more experienced. Stayman, Transfers, Roman Key Card Blackwood and Weak Twos are top of the list...closely followed by Jacoby and Splnters – which brings us to Board 11 from Thursday night.

West and East had 32 points between them but only two pairs reached a slam...

West opens 1 and East immediately realises the partnership has sufficient points for game – and that is where most contracts ended.

However, by using the Jacoby convention, East can enquire about the possibility of a slam without taking the bidding too high.


If partner opens 1 or 1and you have 4+ card support, 12+ pts and a balanced(ish) hand, you bid 2NT (which has to be alerted by the Opener). The 2NT bid is saying nothing about no-trumps; instead it is saying to partner 'I have four or more cards in your suit, suffiicent points for game and a fairly flat hand – are you interested in a slam?'

If the Opener has minimum values, he signes off in four of the agreed suit. However, if opener has extra values (15+ points with a balanced hand, or 6 or less losing tricks with an unbalanced hand) he shows partner a feature in his hand. (3 would show 6+ hearts and a interest in a slam; 3NT would show 15+ points and a balanced hand, while bidding a new suit would show the shape of Opener's hand and an interest in a slam).

In Thursday's example, Opener has the required extra values after partner bids 2NT and bids spades. East then bids 4NT (asking for Aces – with hearts having already been agreed as trumps). Using Roman Key Card Blackwood (5 key cards – 4 aces and the King of trumps), Opener replies 5♣ (showing three key cards) and East bids 6. The more adventurous may go for 6NT.

Both contracts make...thanks to the ♣K being in the right place for Declarer.

* I hope to arrange a weekend course devoted entirely to slam bidding over the next few months. It is likely to include Jacoby, Splinters, RKCB and Cue bidding.

12 January 2012

Hands with a 4441 shape are never easy to bid when you are on the opening side – which may help to explain why only three pairs bid and made the easy 3NT contract available on board 7.

Even the experts cannot agree on the best way to tackle 4441 hands...

My own preference is this: With precisely 12 points I will pass unless the singleton is an Ace or King, in which case I open 1NT.

The real problem hands are when you have 13-14 points (unless the singleton is an Ace or King, in which case you can bid 1NT) because if partner does not bid one of your 4 card suits you have to 'borrow' points to rebid NTs or you end up bidding a second suit and misleading partner who thinks you have a 5-4 shape. I prefer to open with my higher ranking four card minor suit. With 15 points, or more, opening a major suit is preferred...which brings us to board 7.

North, who has 18 points, opens 1 and South responds 1. North can now rebid 2NT (promising 17-18 points) and South does not have to think too hard before going 3NT.

If East leads a , declarer should have little trouble winning two spade tricks, three heart tricks, two diamond tricks and three club tricks.

5 January 2012

No slams and plenty of tricky part-scores meant there was a premium on accurate bidding on Thursday.

Hand 9 was of interest because 3NT was both biddable and makeable. How?

With a balanced 15pts, East opens 1 with the intention of re-bidding No-Trumps at the lowest level over partner's bid.

South passes and West should now bid 1. Some Wests (wrongly) supported partner's clubs straight away (If you have 4+ card support for partner's opening bid of a minor suit but also have 4+ cards in a major suit, bid the major suit first. You can always support the minor suit later, if necessary).

After West bids 1 East re-bids 1NT. Back to West who has 9pts...but have a close look at West's hand. Not only does West have five card support for partner's clubs, thereby guaranteeing a 9+ card fit, it includes a sequence of J10, making it even stronger. So West can upgrade his hand and bid 3NT straight away.

The toughest lead for Declarer is a . Declarer should duck two rounds, winning with the Ace on the third round. Now play the Q with the intention of running it. When that holds you know South has the K. Declarer wins five club tricks, then forces out the A. The opposition can win one more heart, but that is their lot. Game made.

29 Dec 2011

Conventional bids come in all shapes and sizes - including 'Michaels' which is named after its inventor Michael Michaels (yes, he was an American!)

A Michaels cue bid incorporates the use of a cuebid in the suit of the opponent, who has opened the auction, to show a two-suited hand with 5+ cards in both suits. It is employed most often in the direct seat after a suit opening by an opponent.

So if the Opener bids 1 and the next player overcalls 2 he is showing a minimum of 5 (decent) spades and hearts. Likewise 2 after an opening bid of 1 . If the opener bids 1 and the overcaller bids 2 that is promising five spades and five cards in an unidentified minor suit. And following an opening bid of 1, 2promises five hearts and five cards in an unidentified minor.

Not suprisingly, the opportunity to use Michaels does not crop up that often, but it did on board 17 on Thursday evening...



After an opening bid of 1 by North, East bid 2 promising five spades and five cards in an unidentified minor. South passed and West bid 2NT (asking partner to identify the minor). When East responded clubs, West took the bull by the horns and bid 5♣.

After winning the heart lead with the A, delcarer called for the ♣Q from dummy. East played K and Delcarer won with the A. A cross-ruff followed with spades being trumped in dummy and (after one losing and one losing ) diamonds and hearts in his own hand. Game made.

22 December 2011

Board 7 was a Christmas special on Thursday night. Three very distributional hands - including three voids - resulted in some exotic bidding...and, perhaps not surprisingly, the double card was doing overtime. How did you do...

South should open 1 (on the Rule of 20), West passes....and North (with nine hearts, a void and only four points) ponders.

The favourite bid was 4 and that ought to go only one off (you lose two clubs, two hearts) which – undoubled – is a great result and even doubled is still better than average.

Two Easts opted to bid their diamonds and, supported by partner, ended up in 5 but probably felt a shade peeved because 6 makes.(Trump the likely A lead. Cash the A, play another trump which is won by South. Win whatever is returned. Cash the A, trump the two losing hearts in dummy and cash all the club winners).

Board 7 was just one of a number of interesting hands and demonstrated the benefit of having the computer generated – and therefore genuinely random – hands every week.

8 December 2011

Several pairs missed out on a bumper score on Board 23 after South opens 1NT.

With 17 points, West should double - which is for penalties. With North unable to rescue partner (no five card suit for a Weakness Take Out) East should only remove the double if he thinks South will make 1NT doubled.

In this case, 1NT is a nightmare contract and good signalling by West and East should confine South to as few as three tricks - for a monster +1100.

17 November 2011

Several slam opportunities on Thursday which few players took...and prompted another request for a course (or weekend) devoted to slam bidding....which I intend to organise.

Hand 9 was a classic where everyone should have been investigating the possibility of making a small slam in hearts...

North opens 1 and South responds 1With 16 points and six hearts, North JUMPS in the bidding to 3. South now knows the partnerhsip has a minimum of 31 points. If a partnership has 30-32 points they are in the 'Slam Zone' and should investigate the possiblity of bidding a small slam.


With two hearts and therefore a guaranteed 8 card fit, South should bid 4NT (Blackwood) asking partner about Aces. If you play ordinary Blackwood, North will respond 5 (promising two Aces). If you play Roman Key Card Blackwood (5 key cards – the 4 Aces and the King of Trumps), North will respond 5- promising two Aces and the Queen of Trumps. Most partnerships should then end up in 6 . Providing you play the trumps sensibly (get into dummy and run the 10 – covering the J, if it is played, with the Q and playing low if it is not played – the slam makes easily.

6 October 2011

Board 7 was of interest on Thursday because both sides can make a game contract....

South opens 1 and West will overcall 1♠. What should North say with six hearts, but only three points? 2, 3 or 4?

If North opts for the rather timid choice of 2 , East will definitely bid 2♠ and E-W are likely to get into 4♠ ...leaving North to decide whether to bid 5 - which makes.

If North opts for (my preferred choice) of 3 in response to partner's opening bid, East (vulnerable) may shy away from competing with 3, leaving N-S to get into a comfortable 4 contract – unless West bids 5 giving East the choice of passing or putting partner back into 5. Both 5 and 5only go one off and – even doubled – would be a great sacrifice over 4.

More advanced players sitting E-W could make life particularly difficult for N-S.

After the opening bid by S of 1 West would use a convention known as Michaels (named after its inventor – called Michael Michaels!). West would bid the opposition suit (2) - thereby promising a minimum of five spades and fives cards in an unidentified minor suit.


In all probability, East (given the shape of his hand and knowing the partnership had a good fit in spades) would bid 4♠ over North's 2 or 3 bid. If South bid 5, West (with six spades) would go on to 5♠ for a good sacrifice.

22 September 2011

With 33 points between them on Board 5, the NS partnership should be in a slam but some fancy footwork is required if you do not possess a very useful convention called Jacoby 2NT....

Jacoby 2NT is one of the key conventions (along with Transfers, Stayman, Splinters and Roman Key Card Blackwood) more advanced players (2+ years playing experience) should have in their armoury. So what is it? If partner opens 1 or 1and you have a minimum of four card support for partner's major suit, points for at least game (12+) and a 'flattish' hand, you bid 2NT. It is saying nothing about no-trumps but is a convention (which partner has to alert) showing slam interest. With the opposition passing the bidding in Board 5 would go 1 - 2NT – 3NT ('yes' I am also interested in a slam and have a balanced 15+pts) – some players might use Ace showing cue bids before reaching - 6.(6NT also makes but only because the opposition hearts split 3-3).

Can you still reach a slam without having Jacoby 2NT? Yes!

After North opens 1 South knows the partnership has 30+pts and a slam might be on. If you just bid 4 partner may well pass, so what are the options? With 18pts South might bid 4NT straight away(find North has the two missing aces and – if you play RKCB – the Queen of trumps) and bid the slam with confidence. A more subtle approach (particularly if you held slightly fewer - say 16pts) would be to tell a slight white lie and bid 2. Partner has to bid and you will find out more about their hand. Whatever happens, South knows the partnerhsip will end up in at least 4. In this case the reply would be 2NT (15-16pts and a balanced hand). South can then drive the contract into a slam.

15 September 2011
15 September 2011

QUESTION: What do you require to overcall 1NT?

ANSWER: 15-19 points and a 'stopper' in the Opener's suit...unless you happen to be in the fourth seat, known as the 'protective' seat – which brings us to board 12 on Thursday night.

West opens 1with his balanced 15pts (intending to rebid No-Trumps unless partner supports the spades). North passes (the hearts are too weak to overcall) and so does East. So what should South do with a balanced 14pts and good stoppers in Opener's suit?


ANSWER: 'Borrow a King!'


It is normally losing bridge to defend at the One-level unless you think your opponents have not found their correct trump suit. Although a 1NT overcall immediately after an Opening bid shows 15-18pts, a fourth seat 1NT (11-16pts) shows about three points less – hence the phrase 'borrow a King.'


Of course, you and your partner have to agree this as part of your bidding system, otherwise you may have a misunderstanding which results in you playing in 3NT with only 21 or so points. Not nice!


On board 12 the bidding would have gone:

West

North

East

South

1

PASS

PASS

1NT'borrowing a king'

PASS

2 if you play transfers - converted into 2 by South

2 if you don't play transfers

All Pass

And with careful play (which opponent has most of the points?) the contract will make.

8 September 2011

Beginners often find it difficult to take the leap of faith when it comes to finessing. Dare they gamble and try to win a trick with, usually, a 10, Jack or Queen, when the opposition hold a higher honour? Without in any way being sexist, my teaching experience suggests women find it tougher to finesse than men: they don't like the uncertainty.

The outcome of board 10 hinged on finessing – and for one pair it resulted in making 7NT – doubled! How did they do it?

At our table I opened 1 with my balanced 15pt hand. Chris bid 1(the spades were not sufficiently good quality to merit a 2'jump' to show 16+pts). I rebid 1NT and Chris went 4NT (not asking for Aces, but 'quantitive' – asking partner to bid 6NT if their hand is at the upper end of the points range (in this case 15-16) or has extra qualities – or to pass if at the lower end).

Although my points were at the lower end of the range, I took the view that the sequences of QJ, KQ and, most important of all, my 109 merited a crack at 6NT.

Peter Routley and Robin Priestley played this board as the final hand of the night and went for the crown jewels by bidding 7NT.

With ten 'top' tricks - AK AKQ AKQJ and A – the other tricks clearly have to come from spades. Missing the K and J, 6NT will make provided both cards are not with East.

After winning the club lead in hand, play the 10 with the intention of playing low from dummy. When it is covered by the J, play the Q. Now return to hand and play the 9 towards dummy. The other missing honour falls and all 13 tricks come rolling in.

1 September 2011

Last Thursday presented one of the most amazing sets of boards I can remember for a long time, with slams appearing all over the place. Keith and Joan also managed to find a very biddable 7NT on board three. How can the rare grand slam be bid?

South opens 1 - courtesy of the Rule of 20 (if the number of cards in the your two longest suits + your points come to 20 or more you can open).

With 21 points, North knows straight away that a slam of some kind should be on but takes things steadily in order to find the best fit, so bids 1. South repeats the diamonds – 2.

If the partnership play Roman Key Card Blackwood (4 Aces and the King of Trumps are the 5 key cards) North now bids 4NT to see if partner has the K. When the answer is positive from South – 5 - showing one key card, North can now bid 5NT asking for kings. If the answer from South is 6(only one king) North can leave it there. However when South bids 6 promsing two kings, in additon to the previously announced king of trumps, North can now count 13 tricks - AK AKQ probably six tricks, given the partnership has a minimum of nine diamonds headed by the AK AK, Hey presto, a grand slam.

Sadly, I have only one thing in common with the great Andrew Robson when it comes to bridge – and that is our favourite convention.

The Unnassuming Cue Bid – which one lady pupil got very excited about because she thought I had said 'The Unassuming Cupid' - is taught in my Advanced Course along with the Losing Trick Count.

Say the opposition open the bidding 1 and your partner overcalls 1 . If you have three or more cards in partner's suit – hearts - and 10+ pts, rather than bidding hearts, you bid the opposition suit – diamonds – to show partner the strength of your hand. If Partner has an unbalanced hand, he can assume you have got 8 losing tricks.

By the same token, if the opposition open, for example, 1 and your partner overcalls 1♠ you may four spades but few points, so you will 'bid the fit' – 3 . Because you have not used the UCB, your partner knows yours is a weakish hand. A real win-win situation.

On Thursday night it was useful on Board 12...

After West opens 1♠, North bids 2 ♣. Most Easts will go 2♠. Over to South, who has the requisite three card support and 10+pts, so bids 3♠. West passes and North does the losing trick count and the necessary mathematics before bidding 4♣ which makes for a handsome score.

18 August 2011

No matter how well you play, a slice of luck does not go amiss. Liz and Jacky received a generous dollop when their opponents saw fit to double them on Board 8 – and thereby present the night's runaway winners with a generous 'top.'

West opens 1NT. Without Stayman or Transfers (as in this case), East bids 2 (weakness take-out) after the 1NT opening bid by partner, and West passes. (With a guaranteed minimum of 22pts, some Easts might be tempted to pass and leave West in 1NT - which goes off).

I have to say if I had been sitting South, I would have barged in (remember, Overcallers are troublemakers!) over East's bid with 3♣ and would have been perfectly content if partner had bid 4♣ over the likely 3 bid from West. However, South saw decided to double the 2 contract...

2 by East (or West) is never in any danger. At worst, East should lose five tricks – probably only four...

Look at South's hand and there are four likely winners ♠A, ♣AK and the K. If you were South, would you rather try to defeat 2 or play in 3 or 4♣ ?

The moral of the tale? Be wary of doubling trump contracts without a decent holding in trumps.

11 August 2011

Some fascinating boards were on offer on Thursday, none more so than Board 24 which, complete with two voids, caused all kinds of problems.

West opens 1♣ and most North’s are going to overcall 1. East responds 2 while South passes. West goes 3♣, North passes...so what should East do now?

An advanced technique would be for East to cue bid s, which acts as 4th suit forcing (saying to West ‘We are going to game partner, but as yet I don’t know where.’)

Without that tool in the kit box, East should bid 3 allowing West to bid 3NT...which should make easily enough.

4 August 2011

Splinters can be jolly painful unless you are a bridge player in which case they offer a source of great joy - slams.

Board 18 on Thursday was a classic case where it would have been difficult to locate a slam without using a Splinter bid - described by Andrew Robson as one of the 'must have' conventions for more advanced (2+ years experience) players.

So, what does it involve?

 

A Splinter bid conveys several bits of information in just one bid:

· 4+ card support for partner's last bid

· A singleton or void in the suit bid

· Game+ strength

· High card points (ie 10+pts)

           After West opens 1 East has all the criteria for a Splinter bid and so does a double jump in the suit - s - in which he has the void. This asks partner if he is interested in a slam.

In this case, West definitely is interested and enquires about East’s Aces. Using Roman Key Card Blackwood, East responds 5, promising two of the five key cards (four Aces and the King of trumps) and the Queen trumps.

West has no hesitation in bidding 6 and the slam is easily made.

If any players who have completed the Advanced course are interested in learning more about Splinters please let me know

28 July 2011

Peter and David enjoyed a comprehensive victory on Monday and Board 8 very much contributed to their success when they were the only pair to get into a contract of 2 and make 9 tricks. How did they do it?

When playing a suit contract I prefer counting my losers, concentrating usually on my (stronger) hand...

In Spades there are two possible losers (Declarer is missing the Ace and Queen); in Hearts there is only one loser (the 2); no losers in Clubs (the Ace and King will take care of the Jack and 2 in Declarer's hand). But what about diamonds?

Played correctly, Declarer can restrict losers to just one - and thereby make 9 tricks.

West is likely to lead a low heart (the suit bid by East). East wins with the Ace and returns a small heart which Declarer trumps. Cross to the A, and run the J (if East plays the King, cover with the Ace and play another diamond). Either way, aim to trump a diamond in dummy (which removes the defence's last two diamonds) draw some trumps and enjoy you diamonds.

21 July 2010

After the opening lead is made and partner places Dummy on the table, there are times when you think (even after a half time refreshment): "This contract is a doddle..."

Undoubtedly that thought would have crossed the mind of most Declarers, sitting South, after arriving in 3NT on board 15, following a heart lead from the opposition. A combined tally of 28 points and a lovely, long diamond suit + three Aces meant the contract was never in doubt. Indeed, four of the seven pairs in 3NT made 10 tricks and were probably quite pleased with themselves...until they saw they only got 50%.

Three pairs - Gordon and Wendy, Peter W and Tony, and Terry W and Peter A - managed to make the magic 11th trick for a cracking score. So how did they do it?

The key is how and when you play the spades....(You have eight of them and are only missing the Jack and King.)

After winning the likely heart lead trick in dummy, play a small spade to the Ace and then play the 9♠...when West plays the J♠ dummy's Q♠ forces out the King and life has suddenly become very simple. All the remaining spades are winners, as are all the diamonds. The only other losing trick will be a heart at the end - 11 tricks made. 

14 July 2011

NO slams on Thursday night; plenty of doubling (no surprise there then!) and some excellent defending by Denise and John which catapaulted them to victory.

However, I want to concentrate on board 8 where Chris and Jackie were alone in making 11 tricks after getting into 4♠.

Chris and Jackie play 5-card majors which is played widely in the US and Europe and requires five cards to open one of a major suit as opposed to the four required by the Acol system. That may have helped to explain why they opted for their contract instead of 3NT. Given the opposition have two aces and look sure to win one trick from the K and Q how did they still managed to win 11 tricks?

West leads the K which is taken by South's A. If Declarer tackles trumps now, West will win the ♠A, cash the Q and, in due course, East will win the A - thereby keeping the opposition to 10 tricks. However, Declarer wisely decides to get rid of one of those losers early on by cashing the ♣A and then playing the ♣K and throwing away his otherwise losing J. Declarer then tackles trumps and hopes to lose just the ♠A and A. 11 tricks?

Not if the defence keep their wits about them... they can still keep the Declarer to 10 tricks. How?

Let's assume Declarer clears trumps in three rounds and then tackles diamonds. East resists the temptation to take the first round with his Ace; instead he 'ducks' with the 3. When the 10 is played from dummy, East wins it  with either the A (if North plays the Q) or, more likely, the J if North decides to 'run' the 10. Either way East can cash a winning diamond because Declarer has no trumps left in dummy. If declarer, preparing for this eventuality, decides to play only two round of trumps earlier on, East wins the second round of diamonds and then plays a trump...and will still gain a diamond winner in due course.

7 July 2011

Not a sniff of a slam on Thursday and the Hooligan wing of the club was relatively subdued when it came to using their favourite cards - X and XX...

However, board 18 is of interest. At first glance, you might not think there is much difference between bidding and making 3NT or 4 but in duplicate pairs it can be decisive...

With a balanced hand but too many points to open 1NT, East bids one of his longest suit (1) with the intention or re-bidding no-trumps. Partner does not have four card support, but has enough points to bid two of a different suit. With two four-card suits, West opts for the lower ranking suit - 2 (with two five-card suits, bid the higher ranking - 'High Fives').

East now bids 2NT (showing 15-16pts and a balanced hand). More advanced players sitting West, with three hearts, will now show delayed support for partner's opening suit in case East has five of them. (Less experienced players sitting West would bid 3NT).

If East had five hearts he would bid 4, but with just four, goes 3NT.

With a spade the likely lead from South, 10 tricks should be no problem for East. (Win the lead, knock out the A...the clubs split nicely, and a low diamond to the Q works).

Four of the six pairs who ended up in 3NT made 10 tricks for a score of +430 (and a good percentage) compared to the +420 (and a poor percentage) for those in 4

30 June 2011

Lots of No-Trump hands on Thursday night, including board 9 where, somewhat surprisingly, only two pairs bid (and made) 3NT. How did they do it?

With an unbalanced hand, East opens 1♥  and partner responds 1♠. Opener re-bids 2♣ to show his 5-4 shape. West realises the partnership does not have an eight card fit but with a stopper in the unbid suit () and 10-12 points is able to make the key bid of 2NT. With 15 points, Opener can confidently bid 3NT. Although the hand requires some careful play, the contract is makeable.

23 June 2011

THE Hooligans, who were sitting North-South on Thursday, were not happy bunnies at half-time - and they were not alone.

'Hardly had a point,' muttered one.

'Didn't have a bid for the first four hands,' grumbled the other.

And in similar vein, another North-South pair ordered a 'refreshment' and said: 'We could have done with this earlier. The cards have been dreadful.'

And their moans were not without justification. The pairs sitting East-West undoubtedly enjoyed the 'best' hands on the night. Put another way, they had a majority of the points....

All of which makes the final result fascinating. Not only did a pair sitting North-South win, but FIVE of the top seven finishing positions were filled by players sitting North-South 'without the points.'

Moral of the story? In duplicate pairs the quality of the hands you have is irrelevant. What matters is how you play those hands compared to everyone else seated in the same direction as you. For example, sometimes opponents may be in an easy-to-make game contract but good defence by you and your partner restricts them to their requisite number of tricks...while other pairs make overtricks. As a result, you get a 'top' despite your opponents making game.

No slams were bid on Thursday and some of the game contracts took some making. Well done to Peter (Armstrong) and David (Goodliffe) who were the only pair to bid and make 4 on board 10. How did they do it?

East opens 1 (using the rule of 20). Partner responds 2 and opener rebids 3 (thereby showing a minimum of five spades) enabling partner to bid 4.

With the opposition having bid spades, diamonds and clubs, South is likely to lead a heart and the defence take the first two tricks. North does best to exit with a trump.

Declarer wins with the K and assesses the situation. Although he has all the top trumps, he is going to lose the A and a club. How can he get rid of a loser?

There is one hope. Play one more round of trumps (3 to theQ - leaving theA in dummy), then set up the diamonds. South is forced to play his A on the third round. Declarer wins whatever is returned. Crosses to theA (thereby removing the defence's last trump) and thows his losing clubs on the established diamonds. Game made.

16 June 2011

No slams on Thursday but plenty of wild doubling and over-bidding! Take Board 16 as an example where just one pair - Jilly and Fi - bid accurately. How did they do it?

West opens 1 and partner responds 1. South should stay quiet and West rebids 1 (better to show the four card major rather than repeating the diamonds). Now comes the key bid from East - 2 - showng 6s and 6-9pts. With no chance of game, West has nothing more to say.

Easy really - and a cracking score as a result.

9 June 2011

In additon to being connoisseurs of fine wine and food, Stansfield bridge club members love nothing more - it would appear - than wafting the doubling card in the direction of the opponents. (Professor Double, aka Rui, will be thrilled).

Now, let me say straight away, that doubling has much going for it (especially when used for take-out) and it is probably the most underused card in the bidding box but you need to be careful when doubling for penalty.

No fewer than 10 contracts were doubled by opponents on Thursday and only half of those doubles were successful. Two of those declarers doubled duly got out the redouble card, and in both cases made their contracts for a top score.

I have concentrated on board 3 where South should open a heart and repeat the suit after partner has bid a spade. Should East pass or double?

At first glance, a double for penalties may look in order as East envisages winning two spade tricks with the Ace and the King in addition to two or three heart tricks and may be a diamond.

However, closer inspection would suggest passing is a wiser course of action. For starters, there is a very good chance declarer is short of spades (North has bid them and South has clearly got 6+ hearts). More importantly, declarer is probably going to be able do some finnessing of hearts from North through East.

Had West held East's hand, it would have been much harder for declarer to deal with the hearts and doubling makes more sense.

As it is, declarer loses just one spade, no diamonds, one club and....how many hearts?

Well, East has advertised he has hearts by doubling, so declarer wins a trick in dummy (with a diamond or club) and plays the lone heart. If East plays low, declarer lets it run. If East plays the King, Jack or 10, declarer can win the trick - and still only loses two heart tricks. Contract made.

The doubling means declarer has been doubled into game - and a whacking great top!

2 June 2011

While most pairs stopped in 3NT, 4or 4 one pair - John and Denise - managed to find 6. 

 So how did they do it?

East opens 1♠ with the intention of rebidding no-trumps at the lowest level over partner's bid. However, when partner bids 2Opener should remember that partner must have 5+ hearts to make such a bid (If partner had bid two of a minor suit - clubs or diamonds - he is promising 4+ cards in the suit).

As a result, opener knows that they have an 8 card fit in hearts. With 15 pts, Opener also knows they have enough points for game and bids 4. Back to Responder who can work out Opener must have 15+pts (because he can only assume Responder has 10+ with the 2bid). As Responder has 16pts, he knows the partnership is in the slam zone - 30+pts).

Responder now bids 4NT (asking for aces). When Opener responds 5, promising one ace, Responder can confidently bid 6and the contract is never in doubt. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26 May 2011

First, a word about computer generated hands which were used for the second time on Thursday. They are genuinely random hands - unlike hand shuffled boards - which are usually far more interesting and challenging...

There was certainly no shortage of hands of interest this week, but let's start with board 19 where one pair - Nigel and Stuart - reached the ultimate contract of 7NT. What was the best approach....

After South passes, West will bid 1 with the intention of re-bidding No-Trumps. Partner has a massive hand, so jumps to 3 (showing 16+pts). West duly re-bids 3NT.

East can now work out that partner has 15-16pts. How? Well, if West has 12-14pts and a balanced hand he would have opened 1NT...and he would not have re-bid NTs with an unbalanced hand, preferring instead to rebid his first suit, show a second suit or support partner's hearts.

With 21pts, East realises the partnership has 36-37pts - grand slam territory. Some players might take a small punt and bid the grand slam straight away. The best bid is 5NT, inviting partner to bid the grand slam if he is at the upper end of his (15-16) point range, or bid 6NT if minimum. (It is similar to bidding 4NT after partner has opened 1NT or 2NT - which invites partner to bid 6NT with a maximum hand and pass with a minimum hand).

Although West has 'only' 15pts there are two good reasons for upgrading his hand. First, and most important, he knows partner must have decent hearts so his King will prove invaluable. Second, 10s can often prove useful in NT contracts and East has three of them.

19 May 2011

A noticeable trend during 2011 has been the increasing number of slams bid by players in the club - all of which reflects improved technique and growing confidence. Six were bid on Thursday evening and two of those came on board 14.

East has a balanced hand with 18 pts so opens one of their longest suit (diamonds), partner responds one heart and East duly jumps to 2NT to accurately describe the shape of hand and the points range.

West ponders...

Click below to see what happens. 

With 14pts, West knows the combined point count is 31 or 32 points and the partnership is in slam territory, but technically a point or two short of that required for 6NT. However, West re-examines his hand: a combination of length (five) in  s, terrific clubs and the knowledge that partner has diamonds covered encourages an enquiry - 4NT.

This is NOT asking for aces. Following a No-Trump bid by partner it is saying go to 6NT is you are at the top of your points range (in this case 17-18) or pass if you are minimum. With 18pts, East duly jumps to 6NT.

With a likely two of spades lead from South, declarer has to take a vital decision and decide if South or North has the Ace. If declarer opts to play the King from dummy, the contract is doomed, as North will win the Ace and return a spade to partner's Queen. Down one. However, if declarer opts to play low from dummy all is well.  With a non-spade lead, declarer should make all 13 tricks.

In the end the slam hinged on guessing correctly - not an ideal recipe...

12 May 2011

The technical department at Stansfield bridge club is working round the clock to try to avoid a repeat of the hiccup which blighted the first attempt to use computer generated boards on Thursday night and - fingers crossed - all will be well next week. With no hand from Thursday to analyse, here is an instructive hand which should help players of all levels.

Declarer makes a plan... one trump loser (if the five missing spades split 3-2 with the queen in the larger holding), one club loser, no diamond losers, but what does he do with the two small hearts in his hand?

Declarer ducked the King of clubs lead, won the Queen of clubs continuation with his Ace. He then tackled trumps, cashed the Ace and King, leaving the Queen outstanding. He played the Ace and King of hearts, followed by a third heart...

Oops. West won with the ten of hearts, cashed his Queen of trumps thereby drawing the last trump in dummy, then cashed the Queen of hearts - 1 down.

So what is the winning line of play?

Declarer should win the first or second round of clubs, then duck a heart (play a small heart from both hands). Now see what happens.

You can trump the likely club return from the opponents, cash the Ace and King of trumps, then play the Ace and King of hearts  and trump the fourth heart with dummy's remaining trump.You do not worry when the defence win with their master trump because it cannot take two of your trumps. 4 Spades made.