Release 2.19q
Recent Updates
Home Page
18th Apr 2024 16:20 BST
Hand of the Week
18th Apr 2024 10:19 BST
Hand of the Week by Tony Scouller
Exploring the Limits of a Hand

All columnists rely on their readers occasionally to provide them with material. At worst it tells you that somebody is reading your piece. I was grateful to Lester Pereira for sending me this hand. I am unsure on whether he liked my reply or not. Lester and Marina were partners in RAC v London Royal Int Club Ch St Anne.

This was the hand: B19 Game All West deals (rotated)

They bid 1D – 1S – 2NT – 6NT. While the spade finesse lost, they made 7D, 2H, 2S and AC. Home and dried.

Why was I so critical? Well. look first at the West hand. A solid 7 D tricks two Aces and two more second round controls and just 1D opened, What. would you rebid over the expected 1S? We know 2NT was bid (18+points) and then the leap to slam.

As I have written, when P is known to be big, the weaker hand becomes very important and must alert P of your interest. How do you know that he has 7 solid D? He with his big suit and only four losers should I think open with a game force 2C. 2S positive, at least AK but unlimited. 3D (big suit) 3H max two suits. But it is now critical to warn P that you are minimum for your bid - 4D – 4NT (RKCB) -5C (three keys) 5D. Do you have QD? – yes -  6D and East thinks he has shown his hand – Pass.

While 7D would make via the ruffing S finesse it is not cast iron. But every option has been explored.

Comment
Why did I not think of that?

Any reader of my column will know by now that I am a huge fan of T. Reese as a writer.

He writes about advanced positions; but my favourites are the simple hands. The ones where you say, “Why not me?” You are capable of course but you missed it. Try this one. Love  All. South deals. 

The bidding went 1D – 1H – Reese comments – (there are those who consider it their duty not to suppress a four card major) slavish adherence drives me mad too! 1NT – 3NT. The JD was lead and East unblocked the QD on the AD. A club to the QC lost to the AC and D continued. East took his JC but could not put his Partner in to cash his winners.

In the other room when clubs were played East put in the 9C. West smoothly ducked his AC, and again when Declarer continued the suit. He lost to JC who cleared D for one down.

  

Comment
Vacant Spaces and the Restricted Choice

A simple knowledge of the percentages is a useful tool when trying to work out where opponent’s key cards are. It helps on hands like this. Love all West deals. Take the West cards.

                 

West deals and too good for 1NT (15-17) playing 5 card majors opens, 1C- passed to East who scrapes up 1D. Now South 3S and West risks 3NT. All pass and the JS ducked and continued.

Dec counts his tricks. 6D, a H finesse and AS makes for contract. However, if South has QX D and you lose to it – curtains. South has shown that he has 6 cards only to spread (vacant spaces) across the rest of his hand.  He is odds on to be short in D. You cash AD the 7, 2, and 10 from South. Now restricted choice operates. South would only play 10D if he had no choice. The 3-1 break is now massive odds on to be present. Take the finesse in D and try JH when it is covered you have contract.

Comment
The Advance Sacrifice

In pre-emptive auctions, it is often a good idea, when you believe it is the opponents, hand and you have modest support, for partner’s suit, to go where you think you will end up.

This hand came yesterday. East deals and his side only are vulnerable. We will view the whole hand from the first.

East, conscious of the vulnerability does not have an opening bid and little or no defence. A Weak 2S beckons but despite the 4H decides on 3S. South passes. Now what to bid with West? Opponents must have the high cards, surely a fit in clubs or H, and zero defence with his Q high hand. West chose to pass. North now doubles for TO and drew 4C. West now went one more 4S – but too late. North now knows that EW, are sacrificing so partner has at least 4C and values. Had 4S been bid immediately, a double would been two way. Over 4S he went 5C and lost a S,H, and D. -50 an average.

Let us look at how 4SX might play. South gets off to the best lead a trump. Dec knows that only one H ruff will be available. He wins 9S and switches to D. Ace wins. South can count Dec for 7S and if he allows him. Three D and a H ruff 4S makes. These situations are quite common.

Comment
Testing Time for All 2

I worked last week with a group. This hand, the last, challenged all of us including the Coach! North dealt at Game all. Dealer passes and East 1C - natural.

                                 

Bidding.

West responds with an old fashioned, game force 2D (good 5+ suit two top honours at least). East wide open in S agrees D – 3D (key bid). 3S- max - slam interest. 3NT (minimum H stop). 4H cue, must be void. 5C – cue 5S –cue. 6C - AK now. West now counts 6D, 4S with a ruff, and 2C. Where there is 12, surely there is 13? 7D is the bid.  If a weak NT is opened what is your agreement for 3D bid?

 The Play.

North leads a trump, the book lead, all follow. Dec wins in hand, counts his tricks. Where is the 13th? It could come from clubs, who wants to take a finesse in a Grand? Maybe the AH will come down, or they make an error. We need a S ruff. AKS and the fourth ruffed with JD. 10H is ruffed and AC allows a second H ruff, but AQH are still out. Run trumps. Dec retains KJC and KH in Dummy. N has thrown Q9 H and when the last D is played discharges 10C. Time to see the whole hand.  Show. So, the club finesse always wins; but the show up squeeze is more fun! 

Comment
The Old Fashioned Game Force

The Acol system in the forties advocated the jump over partner’s opening bid as game force and reflecting slam interest. It has fallen into disuse due to players wanting to keep the auction low. The problem then becomes one of telling P how good you are. It would have helped on B28 from Woodcote. We will see all from the first. West deals, NS vul.

The Board was played 11 times 6D bid x3 and 6S just once for the top score. I do not know how it was bid at the table, but I suggest the cold grand might be bid thus:

West opens the obvious 1D and East knows with his 19 points that they are in the slam zone. 2S game force, should be – good suit 5+ and at least 2 of the three top honours. West – no point in repeating D, that can wait. He realises his QS is priceless and agrees the trump suit immediately (key bid) 3S. 4C cue bid. Now 4D - good six carder minimum. 4NT (RKCB)  – 5D – one key – must be AD.

 Now do not plunge for the slam, tell about AH – 5H – 6D I have AKD. East can now bid 7S.

No need to rush.  

Comment
Where Have All the Red Cards Gone?

First off, I must apologise for last weeks column. I have had feedback that it was unclear. Oh Dear! on re –read I accept the criticism – but grateful that I have a few readers left.

When deciding what to write I try to use material from both clubhouses so that members may identify their own performance. Sometimes I have difficulty believing what I see. B14 at Woodcote was an example,

 

The results: The board was played 11 times. Eight times in 3S all going off. One of them doubled for -500. Two more in 4C by EW again defeated. One more in 5D minus four -undoubled! I think (but do not know) that East opens 1C and South, at the score pre- empts, 3S. running into the buzz saw. But just one person doubled. Comment superfluous.

Comment
Hand Valuation. How Good Am I?

Coaching, I was asked to work on “hand valuation”. How and why should I calculate my hand? Well join the club. It is the core problem at all levels.

Your partner opens 1S and you decide that you will make a minimum raise -2S. He now makes a trial bid – 3C. Now look at your hand again.  Your raise is the lowest but covers a wide range. Are you against that criterion good, or bad for your bid? 3S says “rock bottom” 4S says I like clubs i'm better than minimum. He too has made a limit bid but is now saying “better than min”.

 More interesting than it looks. B8 at Woodcote. West deals Love All.

The Board was played 11 times. The EW top, 3NT made twice. 4 pairs in S but nobody advanced beyond 2S. Looking at the full hand it is apparent that the most secure contract is 4S loses KS and two D.

West has a difficult bid. 14 points but devalue the short Qs. 1D is preferred, I suspect many opened 1NT (12-14) now a transfer sequence should get you to 4S. It must have often started 1D -1S – 2D (probably 6 cards and min). Now East must revalue. His S suit opposite XXX or a doubleton honour is great if - but he must give it a chance – 2S (must be 6 constructive). Now West, realises that she must revalue        QS - 3S now her partner can bid the game.

Every hand must be reappraised as the information comes in.

Comment
Always something to learn

One of the good things to emerge from my summary ejection from the Devonshire Cup and Plate is that it provides me with hands for this column. Take the North cards. only from B11. EW Only vul. South dealt and opened 1H.

South’s 1H was overcalled 3D (strong 11+, good suit under D Cup rules). You bid 4H and this is passed to West, who after thought bids 5D, you decide to double, and are on lead. At the table she felt they were well in control of H and lead JS. Show full hand Declarer took AS (nobody leads from a K v 5D X) and rapidly, AH ruff.AC, H ruff - 2C ruffed. Dec had to lose AQD and KS for – 100. Not bad when 4H would clinch the rubber for + 820.

Look again at your lead. West has bid solo to 5D.  He must be bidding on something like he has got. One suited. no help from Dummy – so where are his tricks? If he has 7D the most Dummy can have is 2 small. AD and 4D doe not lose your QD and secures +500.

 

Comment
The Over Valued Queen

Last week I wrote about the last board of the Devonshire which ejected us from the main event. It was the board before that,which gave us hope.

West dealt vulnerable so the rubber bonus was valuable:

                                

West dealt and opened 1H – 5 card majors – North X what do you bid as East? At the table 2H was bid. Not good. Just 7 points but Queen high (three of them) no singleton, it is not worth it and 1NT is better. West who needed game, now knew where most of the points were and North short in H. He went 4H and got the AD lead.

What is your plan now you see the disappointing Dummy? Four H and 3 Spades leaves you 3 short. Opponents are going to make a few errors, or we are dead.  We want N to try to cash KD, so in attempt to create some doubt we play 9D and drop the 8 from hand, but he tries JS. We now know 8 of his points, so S probably has the hearts and N AQC. we must use the trumps in dummy. Take QS cash two more discarding a club. Last S, North cannot follow, and we throw the second club. South continues D and you ruff and take the Club ruff. Another D, you are allowed to ruff again, and a Club. Now when you continue D, S ruffs fatally with JH. Take AH and lead club to the now bare QH. Full hand  

You make 4H plus 3 ruffs and 3S and GAME   

Comment
Last Board in The Devonshire Cup

Thanks to a bravura Chauffer – Pearse - I joined a team and entered the Devonshire 1st round on 6 Feb.  There are bidding restrictions as we try to replicate a cut in rubber at the local club. I know I participated in writing them!

Andrew, Brigitte, David Glass made up our team. We drew a competent Roehampton team we got to the half, & found we were -30 aggregate. Nothing. With two boards to go I landed a bold 4H and we knew the match was in the balance.

This was B3 – boards, are not sequential – so the last.          

EW were game ahead so closing the rubber would be big.        

S Deals.

As can be see 7D is cold with sensible play. The small slam was bid and made by Roehampton. This was the bidding in R2. South requested to examine Cup bidding rules and opened 1S. Not everybody worked out, that he had a weak 2 – for bidden. West with a series of broken suits but 18 points opted for a TOX. East bid 2S – game force – bid again partner. 3D now bid and East 4H which ended the bidding. The final result was – 400 to EW and we qualified for the Plate.

Comment
Singleton Lead From Dummy

In defence when a singleton is lead from dummy and you hold the Ace it is usually* best not to play it. A dramatic and instructive example of this play came up at the Mayfield (B3) this week. EW vul. South deals. We will see the whole hand.

South with a choice of suits took the view that with just 12 points he was unlikely to get the chance to bid both. Playing 5 card majors he selected 1S – a playable suit. North did not bid 2H for that reason – it would need 4 cards opposite to make it so. She chose 1NT leaving all the doors open. Pass - and South bid 2D passed out. The 7H lead drew 8,10 and Ace. Clearly spades were needed as a source of tricks. KD was followed the AD and Dec knew he had to lose a trump. The 3S gave East the problem, set up front, and fearful of losing his Ace won the trick. He did not take the H trick but switched to a Club. Take by the ace, and came to hand with a ruff. Declarer played spades, when the J dropped, East had to follow as the H were discarded from dummy. Losing just a trump and AS. Plus 150 NS beating spade contracts.

If the AS is ducked the suit cannot be established. Note how the AS always wins, consider this next time you have the decision.

*There are no absolutes at this

Comment
Counting the Hand

One problem with pre-emptive bids is that are revealing to opponents if they declare the hand.

Take the East cards first. West deals Love All

West passed and North opened 3NT. This was announced as a long solid minor and nothing outside. East decided to double and West took out to 4H and this was passed to South who emerged with 5C. Passed back to you and you elected for 5H. North took  AC and switched to 7D ducked all round to AD. Trumps were drawn and Diamonds ruffed. When S broke 4-2 he lost to the 10S and -1,

As we can now see when North shows up with 7 Clubs and three H he must have only two spades.5Cx goes -3 but only on repeated trump leads. Count the opposing cards.

Comment
Splinter Bid

A tool rarely used In RAC circles is the Splinter bid. Today pre-empts are getting more and more frequent and daring, to thwart the many understandings partnerships have as standard. My basic teaching premise is “to describe your hand as accurately and fully as possible when you bid. You may not get another chance”. Avoid just asking partner – tell him. B25 at Woodcote. North deals. EW only vul.

AS can be seen NS can make 6H. Bidding, North could open 2H weak, but it has two aces and a playable suit. Too good I think - and pass. South now bids 1S (silent EW) and North 2H. Obviously 4H is certain. but there is no need to leap, 4C agrees trumps, says max values for a 4H bid, and club shortage. Now North can see that his AD is priceless – he too is maximum - 4D – 4NT (ask) – 5H (two keys) 6H.

West probably leads the “unbid suit” Clubs - to the Ace and tries 9S. Declarer wins and when the J falls and trumps are 2-2 Its all over.

The splinter is a useful tool. On the night only one pair bid it. Everybody was in H. 

Comment
In Pairs Part Scores Decide

At Team play we have seen that it is the big hands that decide matches, rightly. In pairs events this is not true – all boards have equal ability to produce a top score. This was B1 Love All, North deals in a local event. Here is the whole hand.

We have all seen hands like this! Look first at the hand in isolation. EW can make 3S +140 (4 times) note, how the honourless suit is positive as declarer but in defence only the AS is useful. The top for EW was 2CX-1 (-100). How might the bidding have gone? In these modern times N probably opens with a weak NT. (not me) and East the obvious Dbl. What are your defence agreements? For me Redbl would be a transfer to Clubs. Now West with his three honours shows a willingness to penalise and passes. 2C as agreed and East with 18 points X again. Passed out. But EW can take only the three top trumps and the Aces, - 100 at the score and a bottom. The EW top was 2NT+1.

Points to note:

  • Make sure you have agreed action over 1NTX
  • Long suits without honours are impotent in defence.
  • When you double at low level you need length in trumps as well as high cards.
  • Vulnerability is crucial 2CX and vulnerable is a bottom.
Comment
The Problem of Over choice

When I worked in advertising in USA in the 70’s I found myself confronted with a huge range of media opportunities. One was RADIO which did not exist in the UK at the time. I encountered the problem of too many options – over choice.

This happens regularly in declarer play at bridge. To begin ’24 examine this innocent looking hand. You are South and the 9H is lead. Love all you deal.

You opened the obvious 1S and bid on 2D- 2H- 3C (4th suit) -3D- 4H – 6H. Well you avoided the NT trap – count your tricks. 4H 4D 1S and a ruff 2C. Adds to 12 so what is the problem? The red suits are both likely to break 4-2. If you draw trumps and ruff a S and then find the Diamonds do not break? Over to you.

All right take, a whole hand look. Full hand. Now you see it. Win AS, immediately play a low D from both hands.

Why did I not see that qiuckly?

Comment
What Separates the Best from the Very Best?

The answer is originality. They find and execute moves that when seen in retrospect you say “it is obvious” why did I not think that. Buried in HOW file is a hand I played at the Eastbourne congress 40? years ago. Card for card up to trick nine I played it as Martin Hofman did (reported in the bulletin).

The writings of Terence Reese always had this quality.

Here is one from 30years back.

South with silent opponents plays in 4S on the lead of KD. Now Dec has to lose three red tricks. Trumps must be 3-3 and he needs the clubs or a ruff in H. He ducks the KD and plays low to the continuation. To his horror Full hand the QD wins and after A&KH a third H enables an uppercut with JS for two down.

A Very Happy New Year to all readers from Tony 

 

Comment
A Run Out on Real Bridge

We had a league match arranged and our opponents requested we do it on Real Bridge. Which meant that we had to be coached in its use ! Our charming opponents agreed and coached us as well. I was nervous I had last tried about 3 years back with disastrous results. However, with coaching and the right camera kit, It was, a success - and a now refined program

This hand came up, it is amusing and a lesson in trying everything first. EW vul East deals, and opens -  1D – 2C- 2H – 3NT. The 4S was lead to 3S - 9S and QS. Declarers plan was to cash KD finesse the 10D covered  by the Q, enter dummy with KS and rely on 2S tricks 2C and 5D. However, he did not try Clubs first and North went up with AS immediately.

 Desperate now North tried AH and when P encouraged with the 9H pinned the 10H with the JH for one down. He then saw that Clubs will yield six tricks and the contract. Look again, if Dummy covers – QH - the JH South finds he cannot cash his 5H the 7 blocks the suit. He cannot afford the encouraging 9H

 Yes it is long odds but testing the Club suit cannot cost.   

I am impressed by the revised program.

Comment
The Dorin Silver Salver

This is very much Surrey County Charity event these days. Most of the local clubs holding an event. It was good to see Woodcote participating. The competition was initiated many decades ago by an old friend Ernie Fox . He sold perfumed sponges to John Lewis which he gave as prizes – often left behind! B2 left me speechless when I saw the traveller. East dealt NS only Vul. This was the full deal. Show South and West only

I do not know the bidding but playing a weak NT something like, 3 passes to North  1D – 2C – 2NT- 3NT would be universal, The Board was played 12 times 7 x in 3NT (2S lead) twice more in 2NT once made         (2S again). You are West plan the play? See all

The lead suggests 4th best. We have a prospect of 4 S tricks and the AD. So how was it that seven players shared the top score of+600? I do not know. You take your AS and to avoid blocking the suit are about to continue with the 10s when you realise that after P cashes his S he will not know you have the setting trick. Take it now.

Five top tricks for one off missed by seven players.

Comment
Seeing is Believing

I will show the complete deal up front as you may have difficulty believing my story! North deals at Love All.

I was South. We all passed to West who opened 3H (weak) my partner doubled. Pass to me. What on earth is going on? It cannot be a penalty X with my H holding. If it is a weak 3 pre-empt why are NS saying they have no game? Somewhat baffled that P has not thrown the hand in, I decide to respond naturally – 4C. Passed to East – 4H passed by me to P -5C! The ultimate vote of confidence ! Doubled by East and the AH was lead. We can now see that 4H is cold so my perceptive P has it right. Do I know anything about this game?  

East must have passed a borderline balanced hand. 3H must be true (???) bid but why? We have two certain loser D and S. Clubs I hope will not be worse than 1-3. Knock out the certain loser, ruff AH. AC, QD taken on the second round and continued. AS and another continued fatally by East who sets up the suit. Draw trumps and home +590. The board was played 6 times twice in 5CX four times I H and twice doubled.

Maybe this is why we play the game.

Comment
Beating the House of Lords

RAC played The House of Lords 22/11. Good to see this fixture revived. RAC won, somewhat due to this slam bid by Pralab and Brigitte. See the whole hand.West deals and EW vul.

Pralab (like me dislikes distortion) opened 1D just three losers. Brigitte, has a difficult bid, it is teams so 5 or even 6D is possible but there is so much unknown a simple 3NT may be the answer. She needed to force so improvised with 2C! South now bid 3S weak (wet! – if you will not let them play below 4S go there now). After long thought West bid 5H (pick a red suit slam) and B has an easy 6D decision. North doubled this and the overtrick made it expensive for the Lords when their partners  stopped in game.  

Pralab was quick to note they had missed the Grand. But I think the since 70% security is needed I think impossible v the pre-empt. 

 

Comment
Stranger Than Fiction

After all these years the game continues to spring surprises. I was South and vulnerable, when North dealt and passed. East said 2NT (19/20) and I held:

Well, what would you do? The opener is missing your two Aces two Kings. He must have AKD or better and points in Queens and Jacks. In short not a great hand in defence. Any sort of black suit length in North would give us a playable contract. P must be barren or close.

 Decision time?

I decided to double expecting a D response but knew my partners penchant for bidding a major whenever possible. Who replied 3S. All passed. Time to see the whole hand. Show all. East did not find KS lead but began with AD, ruffed, then AKH and another, ruffed, a club to K and AC. Now 3S, but a cross ruff in the minors lands the part score for a top. 2NT made by NS was the more normal result. Look again at the East hand. With 9 points in QJs it is only a strong NT. My old point about devaluing minor honours.

   

Comment
Combatting the Pre-Empt new

The Pre-empt with the proliferation of artificial systems has become more frequent today.

Online once I asked a pair after about six boards “do you ever NOT pre-empt?” Not often was the reply.

B7 from the Ros & Bob pairs Session 1 was eye catching. South deals at Game All. We will seat you as West at first only.

You are contemplating your opening bid, the vul dealer opens 4H. Your bid?

You have 4 losers, surely, 9 tricks, and three Aces. Partner will be weak, but question is asked again, how weak? Dealer with three unknown hands still to bid, will have a strong trump suit. 3S from you can be passed, 4S does not begin to describe your powerful hand and again not forcing, look again at your hand. You have H432. Dealer has 7 maybe 8, just three or less are out. I think 5S is a reasonable shot. It says “this contract is guaranteed but I have no H control, can you help?” Not easy but he should now recognise that his single KH is priceless, bid the slam.

Time to see all Whole hand. Yes! The (68%) 6S fails on the 4-1break. Nobody bid, the slam. EW dodged a bullet. South’s bold pre- empt kept opponents out of an unmakeable slam.

It happens!_

Comment
We Deserved Better

Match pointed pairs is a cruel game. Without the cards you are at the mercy of your opponents. If they get it right, you lose. This hand last week reminded me.

After two passes I opened with a borderline 1S. West known for his maverick systems 4H. North, never easy to silence 4S.

I received the AH and another won by my K. Where is the KS? At least I am not doubled. I tried a D to the AD and to my surprise he switched to a club to the AC and a D followed to my QD. Why has nobody tested trumps? It can only be because they are concerned not to give away the position. AS felling the single KS and I settle for -50 losing another club.

Always good to fell an offside singleton! Board was played 6 times 4HX, 3H+1 (twice) 4HX-2 3S-1 4S-1 (us). Our score was 70%.my partners bold sacrifice, beheading the KS.

 I thought we deserved better.

Comment
The Bad Break 2

Teams, night at Pall Mall gave up B9. North dealt and E Vul. The board was played 10 times and 6 pairs bid to 6S. Only one was successful. We will see the whole hand.

I do not know how it was bid (or played) but a reasonable sequence would be: West after three passes opens 2C (game force) and East with her 10 points decides - she is worth a positive 2S. West 3D- 3NT - 6S and gets the 3H lead.

Declarer sees that if trumps are 3-2 they have 5S 4C 3D AH. Wins AH and AS. Ouch! Now the task is to lose just one trump. AC and cross to QD (Note the 9) cash three clubs discarding three H. the end position is: East on lead

                              S.J974

                              H,QC

                              D.

                              C..

        S.K10                         S.Q865

        H. …                           H.98

        D.AK54    S,…..         D,….

        C…..         H.K10       C….

                          D.J1087

                         C…….

There are many variations from here but the position is known and West can take 5 tricks from there.

Comment
The Cafe Pairs (2 parts)

This Annual event hosted this year by the Athenaeum was held on 23 October, over 30 boards and won by Andrew Kisiel and David Glass with 66%, Marina and Paul Weston were third with an excellent 64%. It was good to see Pearse Elder and David Twiner showing 7th.  Pearse was good enough to say he felt that he benefitted from my class on slam bidding.  I counted six opportunities. Marina and Paul were the only pair to bid 6D on 12.

West after a pass on his right opened 1D – 3D (inverted minors) – perfect 4NT – 6C (one key and an additional control) 6D. Nice to have the mechanism, when the right hand comes along.

Comment
The Café Pairs - continued

Pearse was one pair of just three to reach 6S on 28.

West opened 1C and got the reply 1S -now he has the perfect hand for a splinter – 4D (4S guaranteed D control must now be 4414) – 4NT (RKCB) – 5H two keys 6S. When trumps fell in two rounds it was over. Well done everybody.

Comment
The Nine Card Suit

I played 17/10 at the Mayfield which was decimated by Covid and anno domini. Heavens! Am I out of date? No cash, accepted, artificial systems abound. Transfer responses seemingly every other bid. Card play high standard, and to cap it all, deals were wild. Not a dull night! Take the North hand only at first: B22. East deals and EW only are vul.

After two passes the Vulnerable West after thought opens 4D, your bid. At the score West would not riskmore than 500. Third in hand his partner must have no more than a bad 10 points and no playable suit? Your move? 

At the table he doubled. His partner replied 4H converted to 4S. the1OD was lead won by the KD and East the Q (McKenney for H). The game is there but not made at the time. 

The key is to recognise that West must have very long D and bad breaks for you. Count 5S two D and AH leaves you two short. The tricks have to come from clubs. Start now! A club to the J loses to the Ace who plays a H. Ace wins and a Spade to the JS reveals the  4-0 break. The hand is now clear. See All KC and another enables a ruff and the tenth trick.

 

Comment
Counting the Hand

When playing in both Attack and Defence I try to build up a picture of the opposing hands. Playing with a variety of partners I always play with count signals. By which I mean signalling the length of our suits and indicating, if possible, the strength. The small cards and the order in which they are played must be noted. A text book example is worth a look.

South opens with a vulnerable 3H weak. You are pushed to 5S. Oh dear one too many, with 5H going off !  South  begins with H.AK and when you draw trumps . South shows two and North one. You cash three rounds of D throwing 2C. South follows.

Time to count. You cannot afford to lose three clubs. South has shown 7 H 3D 2S you cross to dummy and lead a club. If North plays low you duck  if  South wins with his only card, which must an honour now he has to concede a ruff and discard. If North plays an honour you duck and if it holds you let his continuation run to the 10C.

They say “all you need is the ability to count to 13” this is proof.

Comment
The Response to Big Hands

This caught my eye at Pall Mall last week.

The two hands were: EW vul NS silent S deals passes.

West opens I assume with a game force probably 2C. Over to East. Many players simply say 2D – relay - wasting a round of bidding. My view has always been that this also denies a positive. However, with 9 points and an Ace you know that you are in the slam zone. Partner’s expectations are that you have very little, not true. You must tell him so immediately – 2S. He examines his hand and says 2NT (23/24 balanced).3D from East (final value). 4NT whatever form of B Wood (one Key ) 6NT. Just 2 pairs from 8 bid it.

I suspect that most auctions went wrong with a “relay” response.

Comment
Hand Evaluation 3

I have worked for a few years now with the business houses Elite team. They asked me recently to organise a session on Slam bidding. I got help from Victor who programmed such hands for me.  

It is circle’s weakness in both houses. The first point I made was, Avoid “unilateral bids”. Example P opens a weak NT, you respond with a Stayman 2C. Do you have a four card major? It conveys no information, it just asks. P says 2H and you know very little more. The same point can be made with 4NT (Aces and Ks) You need to find bids that tell as well ask. In these days of wild pre-empts you may have very limited time.  It is wider than that. How do you value your hand and how do you convey that to your Partner? West deals at Love All and opens a weak (12-14 NT). How do you respond as East with this hand?

  1. Points 15 so first thought 3NT.
  2. Controls. Here we have two first round (minors)and two more second round (majors).
  3. Losers. The losing trick count tells you that you have just 5. Your partner should have7. 5+7 = 12 so we are in the slam zone! We need to get this across immediately. What are your forcing bids over Weak NT?
  4. Playing strength: Look at the D suit the 4th card is the 8. Partner must have something in the suit. Give him xxxx now the suit has one loser only. In my system 3D would be game force – decent 6 suit. Your move? Two players  chose, 3NT, and two others 3D. See all

Study, the West  hand, and provided he simply raises D Blackwood gets you to the slam.

This was, B8 from Pall Mall just one pair bid this cold slam.

Comment
Crossed Wires 2

I discovered the other week that at Woodcote almost nobody reads Hand of the Week published on Fridays on the Pall Mall website. There could be many reasons– it’s a free country. The no1 reason appears to be that players do not know it exists and there to read by anybody. The RAC Credo is clear. One club two club houses.  I try to use material from actual events at both places. B9 at Woodcote, threw up this oddity which I witnessed. North dealt and EW only were vulnerable. The four hands were:

North looked at his hand. 13 points but single Q is rarely value and a non- playable H suit which you would not want partner to lead. However it does have 2 Aces so I would not pass (I would open 1C) he opened 1H. East 2D and South double (negative shows S). West 3D and North doubled ? South thought this was business so all passed. He naturally lead AH. South saw that, his lead had set up declarers H suit when the 2H appeared. What is partners X based on? His H are hopeless. He has denied S (he should pass or scrape 3S) it must be clubs. He tried 7C. And the defence took 2C, and a  trick, in the other three suits. +200 a top score.

Yes it really did happen !

Comment
Competitive Hands the Most Demanding

Whatever form of the game, Teams or Pairs you are playing it is the competitive hands where both sides have opportunities that usually decide the results. Rightly so, the game is called “Contract Bridge” and the rules favour the bidder. B30 at Woodcote 11/9 (an evil date) East dealt this one at Love All. Take the East seat, and see the EW hands only, at first.

You open 1S and Partner responds 3S (contemplated 4S) North surprises all by coming in with 4C. You 4H (Can you help?) and South 5C. Passed back to you. The previous board has shown that they are a competent pair, so we take their bids seriously. We have 5 losers, an Ace and a priceless club void. He eventually bid 5S. A club lead, and two rounds of trumps were followed by KH and another, Show All when the QH comes up a D and be discarded on the JH and Declarer loses only the two D.

Note that NS goes just one off in 6C. Two pairs were allowed to play 5C but -100 still above average.

                                        

Comment
Three Misses

I looked at the results from Woodcote on 4 September. There were three slam hands (6, 7, 21). Each board was played 7 times: but a slam was bid just once. We will look at B.21. NS are vulnerable and North deals.

With all hands on, view, Spade finesse, winning and D and S suit breaking 3-3, 7C is there, as is 6NT played by North but nobody wants to be in the Grand on a finesse. Six clubs it is.  

How might it be bid? Dealer surely opens a weak NT. South’s hand is huge, it contains a playable suit, two first round and two secondary controls. You think slam try surely? How do you force? What does 3C mean? From me that is good six card playable suit, game force, slam try. North now must resist the wooden 3NT continuation and say what he has – 3D. Bingo! 4NT (RKCB) - 5H (two keys) – 6C. Well done Martin and Richard the only ones to bid it.

 

Comment
The Blue Moon

On 30 August we had a Blue Moon. We were also told that the next one is due in 2037. By which time I will be 100 years old. As often. it reminded of a bridge hand 30+ years ago. East dealt at game all and opened a weak 2S. NS bid to 5D and the JS was lead to the ace and king, and continued with a H.  The NS hands were:

Declarer won the H in hand and played AD dropping the KD on his left. Yes. there must have been a Blue Moon that night.

But why?

The KC has, to be right. East would not have opened 2S with two kings, a well placed, KC is essential. There is no alternative. 

Comment
The Unexpected

When in defence or attack something unusual happens always try to work out why it has happened. A typical example is when they have bid to 3NT. You make a sensible lead and Dummy goes down with a long minor. Dec wins your lead but switches to a side suit in which you hold Ace.

Why? He must believe that the minor is solid and is trying to snatch a side trick before cashing out. So he is probably wide open somewhere. Try this. Take the East cards. Love all. North deals.

The bidding goes 1NT, 2S from you, - 3H – 4H and Partner leads JD. You play AD and the Q drops. What now? Decide before you read on.

Count Declarer’s tricks. Looks like surely 6H, 2S, a Diamond. and a Club. Desperate measures! Why has Partner not lead your suit? She must be void. full hand

You lead 2S (McKenney for a club) ruffed, a Club return and Dec must lose a trick in each suit. These situations crop up quite often.

Comment
The Delayer

In the Second Punic War between Rome and Carthage, the Empire was losing to Hannibal. In desperation they appointed Fabius Verucosus “Dictator” However he recognised that the opposing army with long supply lines and superior numbers could be exhausted. He declined any set piece battle, and nicknamed Cunctator – the Delayer. Many generals deployed this same tactic. Wellington behind Torres Vedras, Montgomery behind Auchinleck’s position at El Alamein.

B16 at Woodcote reminded me of this. Take the South cards at first as declarer. West deals and is vulnerable.

West opened 1H and N doubled. East 2H and South 2S (now or never.) West 3H and North 4S. West began with AKH and switched to 6S trapping the QS. He can now count 5S,2D, AC two more needed. Could the D produce 4 tricks? With luck, yes. Entries back to hand for the finesses can only be in trumps. Normally you would want to take AD to cater for single Q. But then how do get back to hand for the club finesse? It goes against the grain but an immediate play to JD is necessary. Do not “murder“ the 10D. Wins! 4S to J, 7D to KD and the QD appears from West. Draw the last trump and return to 10D.  Take Club finesse and claim. Full hand.

Deep finesse could not have done better!  No other pair bid game or made11 tricks

Comment
A Board of Errors 2

Board 26 at Woodcote 7/08 featured this hand. It contained many errors (no names – I was South and not entirely innocent).

Here is the full hand. East deals at G All.

East opened 1C & South the obvious TOX. Pass and 1S (this is “forced”and the weakest bid possible- far from the truth). With opponents silent South who is minimum, decided that                

North must be better than said, and raised - 2S. (?doubtful) West 3C and North 3S. South noting his singleton C and North bidding twice on a minimum must be regretting the negative response raised to game. The AKH were lead (5H 8H – why not 8 first) unsure of the QH location switched to KC. Taken by the AC and Dec now lead JS (Jack murder, establishing the contract setting 10S – a no win play. Giving up on 9S). The QS was cashed, and he continued with a D to K and then Ace and another D. West ruffed the loser with the (certain winner- the 10S).  The losing H went away establishing the D suit.  Declarer ruffed a Club, and was home.

Stop there?

 

Comment
A Very Old One

The Holidays are on. I know because it’s raining. I have not played this week and looking at the web sites could spot no interesting material. Never mind, lying around my house are lots of old hands. I recalled this one. In my youth   I played against Peter Swinnerton – Dyer. Mathematician,  prodigiously clever, he eventually became Master of St Catherines College Cambridge. Selected for the European championships he was South v the French. This was the hand, North dealt. Love all.

North opened 1D the response was 2C, they then found the   4-4 fit in 4S*, on the lead of 4H. Dec took his AH and saw that the H had to be discarded and the inevitable three trumps would be lost. He played clubs, West ruffed and was overruffed by the 8S. He returned with a D ruff, away went the H. West decided on the AS when clubs were continued. Now South could limit his losses to the two high trumps.

The play was reciprocated exactly by the French!

*Note -  Never support the second suit without four.. The spot cards in both black suits.  

Comment
The Weakness – Slam bidding

I have written many times about slam bidding. It is the major weakness in both clubhouses. Why should this be? Analysing and studying the results as I always do in search of HOW, I have concluded the following.

1. Not appreciating the importance of playing strength as opposed to high card points.

2. The critical importance of controls. Aces,  Kings, voids singletons.

3. When one hand is big, the expectation of that bidder is for Partner to be weak. But how weak? Any kind of length for example, if it fits can be pure gold. Tell him.

​​​​​​​4. Cold feet above game!

At Woodcote 24 July just one pair bid this cold 6NT on B21. One other 6C. Dealer North, they only, are vulnerable.

                                    

North opened 1C, opponents silent, and South 1D. – 1H. South has 14 points but three aces. – 3NT (14/ 15 balanced denies 4 card major). North now looks again three Ks but a club suit opposite a doubleton honour or 3 small is a huge trick source. Perhaps 4C now (slam interest, must be 4-6) but decided to bid 4NT. What is this? No suit agreed, is it quantitative)? That makes no sense on the bidding so decided to play it as RKCB. 5C – 0-3 keys. South cannot be worse than A A KC or AAA. – 6NT*. The percentage play in clubs is two finesses (75%) but at the table the KC lead gave an early claim.

* Note 30 points combined, four first round controls, key intermediate clubs, and just one Q.

Comment
Everything Wrong!

Here is another hand from the Centenary Cup. Typical of our luck on the night. Well, that’s our excuse. B14 East deals at Love All. The whole hand was.

East opened a weak 2H and I made the obvious TOX. West 3H. I would have gone 4H which is cold and makes it very difficult for NS to come in. Passed back to me and - 4C. My excellent P trusted my bid and raised to 5C. 7H was lead, taken by East who switched to 7D. This looked like a singleton, so I won AD ruffed a H and lead 3C. I lost of course, the two minor Ks. Flat board.

Comment
Another Eight Card Suit

There seems to be something in the air at Woodcote. I keep encountering 8 card suits which as I have said are difficult to bid. Minding my own business with Pearse Elder, South, at Love All. I pick up: The bridge gods are laughing at me. B11.

South opens 1H – 1S. Your bid! Zero defence, points, I cannot bid, nothing to be done but wait. East supports to 2S and 3D next. 3S and back to me. I decide on 4C (long and weak no top honours) I can in desperation revert to H, to my surprise P – 5C, promptly doubled by East and the 2S lead to the KS. Another S will establish QS. Eventually she selects JH I cover with Q

See Whole Hand

 Where are the clubs? I now have 7 C tricks, two red aces and two H. But a loss to single KC not good. Go to AC and the unexpected void shows. AD throw S, ruff a D and ruff last S with QC. Diamond back and knock out KC. 550 +. Many made 5C the double gave us a top.  

Comment
What is Partner’s Shape?

One of my constant themes is, tell partner what you have got. With better information they will make better decisions. I played on 3 July at Woodcote with Pearse Elder, who has been given the demanding task of improving Intermediates at Pall Mall. Tough task, we wish him well. By definition a new partnership and a shaky start. We improved and were playing better when as NS we picked up B17. I will rotate for convenience and we will have West as dealer at love all. Here are the two hands. In this instance I am East.

Pearse opened 1H. I contemplated my 16 points but ruled out 2S as the suit lacked playing strength, we also needed bidding space - 1S. With his aceless 14 count P bid 2D. We obviously had a game but where? 3C- (fourth suit) can you help here, or tell me more? Now P made the excellent bid of 4S. OK partner I am minimum but really like your S. He must have five H, four D, three S. Room for just one club.

Bingo! – 6S.

I got 2H lead, won, cashed 5S, went dummy and cashed hearts. At trick 10 when the final H was played opponent had to choose to unguard, QD or chucking AC. He got it wrong, and 13 tricks landed for 100%.

To my surprise only one other pair went to 6S

                        

Comment
Long Suits at Pall Mall.

On 22June at Pall Mall an Imp had got into the cards. There were two deals which featured 9 card suits. Such hands are difficult to bid. The first was B2 NS only vul: and you take the East seat as dealer. We will only see the Dealer’s hand initially.

Show East only.

Your bid! The D suit is powerful (fourth card is 9D) but broken, possibly two losers. But unless your hand declares the trumps it can be cut off from partner. Playing in NT a S lead and a D loser will render it impotent. It has just 12 points so there are 28 to share with everybody else. Nine or ten could include two Aces and you have an easy 6D. If you pre-mpt you may be simply shutting yourself out. You have a long suit, do they?

What system are you playing? An old-fashioned Acol 8 playing tricks 2D would be ideal, but most of the club play that bid as weak. Then whatever you bid, let us say 1D, what do you rebid after almost anything, from P?

Ok, there are the options. Decision time: What would I have done? I do not like 1D because of the rebid, and the one suited nature of the hand any large number of D misleads P of slam possibilities, I want to leave as many doors open as can.

I bid 4NT. In this situation, no suit agreed, it simply asks for Aces. See whole hand.

As can be seen this works a treat. 5H two aces 6D, if he had KD he goes 7D but of course passes. On the night just one pair got to 6D (I do not know how) and another went off in 7D and one more in 6NT everybody else in 5D.   

Comment
Beginners and Intermediates 2

Anne Catchpole teaches beginners at Pall Mall. I commend her to all. Basics are the foundation of our game and there can be no progress without them. Many of our “intermediates” do not merit the designation. She drew my attention to B14 on 15th June played in both groups at Pall Mall.

We will see the whole hand: East deals at love all.

The first question is do you open as dealer? My & Anne’s  view, is that it is not worth it. Anybody who has read my Essay “What is an opening bid?”  will know why. Pass and West probably opens a weak NT*. Given the long clubs and just 10 points I would go straight to 3NT. As can be seen this requires deadly defence to defeat. A spade lead and a switch to the nine of diamonds followed by the QD. !!!

If 1C is opened it will probably go 1C-1D -1H and get to 4H.  South’s most likely lead is AS followed by QS. Now AH and KH shows up the certain loser. The side suit – clubs, must be established immediately. The percentage play is the finesse. Declarer plays AX clubs taking the finesse. Now one more trump and lead clubs. Losing a spade, heart, and diamond. The results in both designations are on the website.

Not pretty.

*Reese and Schapiro did not play Stayman they believed it helped the opening leader.

Comment
The Late Miss. RAC v ACL

The annual match v the Auto Club de France was played last week. The A team of 8 lost by 8imps. The B team of four were heavily defeated. The problem with a narrow margin (less than one game) is that everybody can point to a board where they could have won it. I have no intention of pillorying anybody.  It was a hard fought. match, which is what we want. Paul Found drew my attention to B32. West deals and EW are vul.

We will see all immediately.

With our knowledge of all four hands, we see that 6S loses only to the KC. EW +1430. 6NT also works by East and so does 7D! But 7H* goes -5 +1100 to EW. Does anybody fancy a sacrifice at this late stage? Not me!

The French opened a weak 2S. Pass to East. When partner as dealer, at unfavourable vulnerability, opens weak 2 it will not be rubbish. In a tight match they will not want to incur a match losing penalty. The French thought a long time and bid 6S outright. West should be good for 6 tricks. East has three first round controls and a 5 loser, hand. (There is a case for 6NT protecting the KH &playing the hand himself).  RAC East bid an Ogust 2NT (describe your hand). South pass. I am not sure of EW methods. West bid 3D. Opponents were now alerted that a slam was possible and North bid 3H for the lead.  East 4S – South 5H - West 5S this after the 3D must be added values as 2S is a limit bid. It can only be a H void but, was passed out.

The board was played 6 times. Just once in 6S and among the rest just one pair went beyond game. Nobody played in Diamonds.

 

Comment
A Grand Slam Missed

This was Board 18 at Woodcote 5Th June East dealt and N/S are Vulnerable I was North, and we will at first see only North my hand. Summon up the full hand whenever you like.

My partner opened a 15-17 1NT and I contemplated my monster S suit. Looks like 8 playing tricks, so we are in the slam zone. Set the trumps. 2H transfer 2S. Now aces are the key -  4NT (RKCB)- 5C (since I have AKS must be 3 Aces) Now I can count 12 tricks . But what about QS. We had a few bidding disputes during the evening and to my shame I chickened out on the identification of the QS and simply bid 6S. I must bid 5D do you have QS? – 6S yes! I go 7S.

To my astonishment only two other pairs got to 6S.             

Mea Culpa

Comment
Squeeze Play

I have had correspondence on this subject recently. Players seem often to see this as the prerogative of the expert. It is anything but. This was B2 at Woodcote 29 May. East deals and N/S only are vulnerable. Let us see NS only.

The board was played 11 times and just four pairs did not go beyond game. Two pairs went off in 6NT. Almost everybody lead QS to South. I think the bidding probably went: 2NT -6NT.There are 4C, 3H, two D. and two S. Eleven on top. The main hope is a squeeze. However, consider first the Spade suit in isolation. The lead of the Q surely shows the J and the 10 as well. Take the K and send one back ducking in dummy if the 10 appears now the 9S is our 12th trick.

 We can agree that QS gives the hand. What about a neutral H lead? Now we need, to “rectify the count” reducing the hand to N +1. The number of tricks we have plus the one needed. But for a Squeeze to work one opponent must be guarding both S&D, The, red suit will be at best 4-3 and it is the 4th card of that suit which will “menace” Declarer. We win the Heart and immediately exit with 5D. East wins and continues with Hearts or Spades.

 

Show Full hand.

Now S wins in dummy. Take 3H and 4C staying in dummy. West cannot retain10D and QS when the fourth Club is played. 

 I wonder how many of the successful Declarers found this play or did they rely on opponent’s error?

I would love to know!

     

Comment
The Vienna Coup

I have worked with the Elite team in the Business Houses league hope to be promoted next year.  They also play in the London League. Paul sent me this one and asked could he have made it? B22 East deals EW only are vulnerable. This was the hand.

Paul arrived at 6NT and the answer to his question was “not on a H or S lead”. Paul however got 5D. This is a “McCawber” hand – you hope something will turn up.

Clubs have got to break. We would then have 5C, 1H, 2S, 3D one short. South wins the third C and probably continues with 2D. Now the only hope is a squeeze.

Norths D length suggests that South may be guarding both majors. I do not have any better ideas! For the squeeze to work on South. The Vienna Coup.The AH must be cashed establishing the K if he holds it. This leaves an entry in each hand, now when the minor winners are won South cannot resist the pressure and has to unguard one suit.  

Comment
Can It be Made?

It was the last board of the Centenary Cup. While we were winning matches and playing well, we could not get the big swing Imps that were needed to put us in the top three. This was the full hand. West dealt at Love All.

West passed and my P opened 1S. We bid:2H- 3C (game force) – 3D (fourth suit) P took this as club support but balanced 10+ points, no S support. He had a shot at 6NT. The 9D was lead.

Declarer counted his tricks one of majors has got to provide 5 tricks or there is no hope. Which? It must be Spades. Even if the finesse wins – 50%, the suit must break 3-3 for the Q to drop. The 109 S gives the opportunity to repeat that finesse, so we count five Spade tricks. That means that entries to dummy are precious. We have 5S, 2H, 2D, we need to have three club tricks. Win the first D in hand and play KC. East ducks but the 8C falling establishes a finesse position.

AH and another to KH and the QH appears! Forget the S we have 5H tricks. Cash the hearts. Lead 9C if ducked again we have three club tricks. Far fetched but possible

Comment
Do you open or not?

At Woodcote B 4 was this West dealt at Game All. We will see only dealer’s hand at first.

Well? Do you open as Dealer. I have written many times about the need for sound openings and pre-empts particularly at vulnerable. We can easily agree that the hand is borderline. But supposing you do not open? Will you ever get the chance to express the length of your two suits? So you open 1H (5 card majors) overcalled 1S and East bids 2C. See whole hand.

Now a raise to 3C (never raise the responder’s suit without 4) – 3S - cue bid slam try, agreed suit C. West has said he is minimum, but he does have additional values 4D. East 4NT – 5D one key The D bid must show a void or second round control now his AQH come into their own 6C. Only two pairs bid it. 6S x costs 1100 but who fancies that at pairs?

Comment
The Extra Chance?

Woodcote on May Day threw up B22. We will see first the whole hand. East deals at Love All, passes. I am South playing with Lester and open 3NT this shows a long solid minor (7/8 and -nothing – outside). What do you bid as North?

Lester cursing me for putting him in such a position, knows my suit must be Clubs, can count 11 tricks. With possibilities in the majors and a connecting 8C bid 6NT.

West lead 3H and I too counted the 11 tricks. The 3H suggests a balanced hand. If he held the QJD or, he might have lead AD if held. The Spade finesse could deliver the 12th. Squeeze? yes but because the DA has not been cashed the count is not rectified, and I dare not play D. Ok cash AK H they follow, AS ditto. Over with 8C and cash six clubs. West C103 5H D953. East C.742 D.84 H.J. I still have 5C and SJ10 10D. I play 5C West JD. He has kept QH and JH is still out so threw another heart. East JH, W has QH East looks certain to have AD and probably QD. Nobody has discarded a S. I am none the wiser. I took KS and nothing happened, perforce KD and East pulled the wrong card! The KD became the winning trick! An undeserved top.

But what was the Extra Chance we missed? We all strive for the NT ten points at pairs. We equally know that suit contracts are more flexible. North must bid 6C!

This protects his KD. Now East is on lead and the only lead that does not give it, is a trump. S wins, draws two more and crosses to AS. He now plays AK7 H discarding all his D. If East wins he is endplayed. If W overtakes, he establishes the suit. It is deals like this that keep your scribe from sleep. All I had to do was take the spade finesse   

Comment
Eleven Black Cards

Big two suiters are difficult to bid. Both suits need to be shown to Partner and it is P who is weak in those suits who has, to choose the one to play in.B14 at Woodcote 24/4 East deals Love all. It will be simplest if we see the complete hand.

I was partnered by Pralab Barua who sat South to my North. East passed, we had agreed to play Benjamin 2s so 2D would be big. He passed (I would have risked 3D). West now 2H weak (again I would have gone 3H). Great for me 3H (spades a minor) – clearly not D! He bid 3S and the spotlight fell on me. I have just two losers I need to convey how big I am -5C. I have often written, if one hand is very strong by definition, P will be weak. It is therefore crucial that what little assets he has are specified if possible. Pralab, bid 5S (5H is better) and I could not resist 6S.

9H was lead, won by the Ace and 2H ruffed in dummy to lead a club to King and Ace. The D switch ruffed and when JC fell under the QC it was all over. No other pair got near the slam. Most stopping in 4S. Marina who won the event was able to open 2D weak. I have no idea how to bid the slam after that. Notice how the 2H enabled me to describe the strength and shape of my hand in just two bids.

FUN.

Comment
Woodcote v Pall Mall 2023

Our annual joust between the Clubhouses took place 19/4. Teams of 8. Woodcote’s hospitality was generous as always and the match was most pleasant. I found myself appointed “chief fall guy” for a comprehensive rout by Woodcote. Ah well!

The PM team members would like to be anonymous, but it may be too late. For HOW (scratching)I will relate our grand slam missed by two tables. Game all West deals.

We play 5 card majors, strong NT. I opened 1C (could be short) and got the response 2D (good suit, game force). Had it been 1D 1 would have bid the weak NT; but it is now critical to show values after the ambiguous opening. 2S – music for P. who decided to go for 4NT immediately. RKCB – 5S (two keys and QS). Back to East the response shows nine points – must be S.KQ and A.C. It sounds like a balanced weak NT opposite. The 2S denies 4H so there should be at least three D opposite and four more points – count the tricks - 7NT. On a club lead the Grand is laydown. B 23 near the end, cheered us up.

Comment
Last Board at Woodcote

On the wet Easter Monday, I played with Marina. The cards were very dull, but the game always bites back, and this was our last board – 14.  East deals. Love All. Take my cards first Show East only.

We play Benjamin 2s, 5 card majors, possible short club. So I opened 1C. Our opponents appeared to be unfamiliar with the system and passed. West 2S (game force) and back to me. A quiet 3C (usually shows 6) and the reply 3H.

Your bid?

Partner must have a big major 2 suiter. But my hand will not help her. The AD looks priceless. I decided that I must play the hand and in clubs – 6 Clubs. I got the lead of KD (why not AH and have a look?). Ruffed in dummy – time to see all. When dummy went down Marina - somewhat shaken by the bidding, asked “what did you think I had?” “A big major two suiter” I said. Looking at all four now it can be seen that seven clubs, three spades, AD and a ruff brings it home. I had no clue that South had passed with 16 points (TO X?) and 5 spades. Tempted by a discard of 9H I played AKS and was horrified by the ruff. Now if I do not overruff and he plays a trump I lose the second D ruff. So, I overruffed and took the D ruff. QS followed and this time he did not ruff. away went the H and on the run of the clubs. S chose to keep H rather than 10D. This was a top matched by one other pair. Good bidding but poor card play. all round.

Comment
The Ross Cope Swiss Teams

 I was delighted to see that Sally & Paul Found, Jeremy Wright & Richard Williams won this event. I have worked with three of them and mentored Jeremy for a while. They scored 74% with 89 vps. To win from Lester’s team and, Hurlingham, with stalwarts, Ruth and Sami Masri.

My dislike of Swiss teams is long standing because so often in 6 Board matches one hand decides it. The counter to that is the premium on attack. Defeating a vulnerable game can be a match winner. Sally sent me this hand B13. G All. North deals and opens 1S. East passes and I invite you to take her cards. Show S only.

Decide before reading on

         

Sally passed of course, and West 1D – Pass and 3NT from East and you are on lead?

Your first instinct is to Partner suit. But East after passing has jumped to game. With no attractive overcall, Sami Masri must have 10/12 points and S well stopped. It must be a double stop mopping up 5+ points. Leaving West to stop the other three suits. Unlikely. So a speculative 3C looks worth a shot. Full hand.

Down 2 and their partners found the 4H for a 13/7 win.

Our friend Sami’s retort: “why did you not lead your partners suit?”

Comment
RAC v Royal Mid Surrey

We had a most enjoyable match v RMS golf club. We had the best of the luck and built up a clear winning lead which probably accounted for the bidding on this hand from the last quarter. I will show the whole hand which will make the story easier to believe!

North (RMS) knowing the scorecard decided on 3C! East pass and a puzzled S eventually passed. When did you hold 100 honours opposite a pre- empt? I came in with 3D partner raised - 4D and S, 5C.

The point here is – if you would not let them play at game in a major go 5C immediately. Would West have risked a hefty penalty with 5D? I think not. I went 5D and Pralab doubled 6C, heading me off and netting +800. I thought we could make 6D but the H spots are not good enough. However, 6S is cold. In the other room. North passed and S opened 1C. RMS found the spade fit but stopped in game to reduce the deficit.

 

Comment
TWO TAKE OUT DOUBLES –GOT BOTH WRONG!

The TOX is a useful device in defensive bidding. However, it throws up problems of its own.

B11 at Woodcote this week here are the EW hands Love All.

South opens a weak 2H and draws the obvious X. North passes and East is caught with just about the worst hand possible. He cannot pass and opts for the weakest bid he can think of 2S. S bids 3H and West with his 4 loser hand 4H        (Max with S support) and E is forced to 4S. Opponents muddled the defence and they got away with it +420 EW.

The last B28, West passed and North only Vul 2S. You E hold: S.Void H.AK754 D.AKJ1062 C.K8 your bid? The obvious choice is X but mindful of B11, may well draw 3C rather than a red suit. Michaels – 3S would show two suits but which two and we are then too high to clarify. Decided? At the table a X was bid and drew 3C. East has a 3 loser hand, and is slam minded. If P has C.Axxxxx we have a good slam chance. Your move again? P has no idea that I am so strong 3S - agrees C tell me more game force. It continues 4C - 4S – 5C.

This was the West hand: S.76 H.Q9 D.Q983 C.A7532 . Clubs broke 4 - 2 so the game was made but with 7D cold a deservedly bad score.

So who was to blame?

Comment
The Fight for the Overtrick

On 6/3 at Woodcote threw up this hand B21. North deals and only they are Vul. We will see the EW cards only and invite you to take the West cards.

One pair bid to the 6S. If East opened 2H (weak) or 1H a 2S response would be forcing. He got the AH lead and ruffed. Play on:

You can count 6S. 2H, 2D. If the DQ is right you have 11 tricks. I do not know how the actual W played, but it is tempting to take the D finesse for entry to Dummy, which loses to QD and S cashes AC for -1. No good.

Let us draw three rounds of trumps: but now they are 1-3 (the 10S does not drop) so the D is too dangerous, as the H must be 5-2 or even 6-1.

       Go to AD and take KQH shedding the clubs now if the QD is not doubleton but D at worst 3-2, you are home.

The board was played ten times 7x4S one in just 2S and once 3NT. Let us now see the full hand.

How about another lead? A trump? The 7 from dummy will give an entry with 9S to play a club. Now just a D ruff is enabled as the KC gives a d discard. Risky of course! Perhaps the 9D is best? But Dec must again eschew the finesse and lead a Club.

Twelve tricks would be a top as it happens  so no need to bid the dodgy slam!

Comment
Risk Free Bridge does not Exist.

I wrote recently, about risk. The Journals abound with tales of the world’s best coming spectacularly unstuck in championships. It cheers the toilers like us up. The proliferation of artificial systems has spawned ever more aggressive pre-empts with the design of increasing the risks for their opponents.

This was B9 at Woodcote 27/2 North deals and only EW are vulnerable. We will see the full hand, easier to follow.

I was South and North opened 3S – pass. When partner pre-empts with three unknown hands to follow it will not be rubbish, 3rd in hand will be looser! I with just 7 points have great hand. Count the tricks, hopefully 7 trumps and AC, but couple of club ruffs would give us game. A raise to 4S jumps out.

Now what does West do? They are trying to talk him out of something, but what, and at what level? A double now would be two way, (three players did, and got left in). 4NT I think is best, would suggest a two suited hand. It is likely that they are trying to talk us out of H. But there is no escape from the vulnerable risk and the possible phantom sacrifice. We see that 5S is cold. Two pairs were pleased to go off in 5D – cheap at the price. Nobody played in H.

Comment
Plans, Percentages, Entries, Breaks, Spots

When you play as Declarer you are offered a choice of lines of attack. Trick 1or 2 is so often the crucial moment for decision, when you have the least information. We played KPMG in the league on 20/2 and took a 32 imp lead at the half. This was B1 on resumption. North deals and passes and both Easts opened a weak 2D.

We will look at EW only first.

In R1 South overcalled 2H and West decided that he would never let them play in 4H so went to an immediate 5D, - N doubled. In R2 they went more slowly but got to 5D undoubled. You take the East seat, and they play two rounds of H, which you ruff .Plan the play !  

North would surely not double without a trump trick. If they are 4-0 we are dead. Assume 3-1 and a certain loser, and another in S. We have two S, two Clubs, five trumps and a H ruff, one short. In Dummy we have the Clubs and Spades.

Can something be done with either suit.? The QC coulddrop about 30%. The suit should break 4-3 (62%) but we will need to ruff twice and get back so entries are precious. We must go for C - now. AK clubs throw Spades, ruff the third, they break, looks like the Q in South. DA they both follow, (phew) KD over to AS and the fourth C. Ruff and give up the trump and claim.Have we missed something see whole.

Now we see how easy it really was. 10D from dummy at trick 3 and when covered pins the 8D now your Trump loser vanishes. Why do we play this ***** game?

Comment
Watch the Spots #2

I have been playing at Woodcote recently. I sometimes feel that I am the only one watching the small cards. Partner leads and dummy goes down. This is a crucial moment.13 cards you have only heard something or nothing about are exposed, work to do. Go back over the bidding, is this in line with your expectations? If not in what way, and why? To avoid any misleading info, say to opponents “give me time for a look”. Nobody should turn their card until the last to play has turned theirs. Let’s look at a typical situation, the defence to 1NT. At some time we find ourselves during the night with this one. Rubber bridge EW only vul, the whole hand, old Acol, strong NT, West passes North IC, you pass, South -1NT passed out and the 2S is lead. We will see North and East only at first.

You study Dummy for the first time. Count the points. Looks like the opposing sides are 20/20 or close. The opening bid and response suggests no five card suit anywhere. The rule of 11 tells you that Partner has lead from Axx2 or Jxx2. It helps if you convey as much info to P as quickly as possible. The best is 9S when Dec wins the forced JS and you both know the suit.

See whole hand.

Remember that you need 7 tricks to defeat the contract. That means cashing the 3S can wait. Two D are required but the leads must come from West . Dec tries H and you win AH and switch to QS overtaken and D emerges. QD wins and carefully retained 4S gives your clever P the opportunity for a second D. The KCis the setting trick at the end The spots are signals, entries, winners, played in the right order killers.

Comment
Minor Suit Slams

Minor suit slams are notoriously difficult to bid at Pairs. The lure of NT and major suit bonuses difficult to resist. A classic case arose on hand B10 at Woodcote 13/2. East deals at G All and we will see the whole hand.

Looking at all four hands we can see that 6H depends on the suit breaking and the finesse succeeding. We (5 card majors) bid 1C – 1H – 1S – 2D (4th Suit forcing) -2H (nothing more to say must be 4324) – 4NT – 5D (one key) 6H. This was ruined by the bad break and earned us a bottom. Unlucky yes but poor bidding.

I think it should be bid 1C – 2H (game force good suit) 2S -3C (must be 4card support) – 3H (no further values 3Card support) 4D (cue bid) now 4NT – 5D (1or 4 keys) – 6C (South’s preference could 4/5 black) Not so easy for N to pass but the flexibility of the clubs?

West leads 7D and the AD wins, note the KD drops. Dec counts his tricks and sees that if the H finesse succeeds he has all 13 tricks. But then he will have missed the superior slam so he must play on the assumption that QH is wrong. AS KS discard D, and a ruff, Club, back to 10C second S ruff .

AC, draw trumps and H to the Ace discovering the break. But now he knows the hand is what we have known. He exits with a D and a East has to lead into the KJ H.

Not easy. Intriguing !

Comment
The Opening Lead

My Partner and I had an instructive misunderstanding in the Reform 6/2. This was the last Bd 18. East deals NS only vul.

At first we will seat you in West and expose only your hand and the dummy. They bid East 1S – pass and West 3NT - you dare not now bid, and must find a lead.

Over to you? The 3NT shows 13/14 points balanced. No S support and surely no 5card H suit. There is something else. He wants to play the hand. Why? We can hypothesise that he wants to protect his minor suit holdings. Kings? South sounds like 2- 4 – 3or4 – 4. He will have a D stop but what might it be? KJx or just the Kxx or Jxxx. Partner must have a max of 3/4 D. This is a book position. You expect to lose one D but must avoid two. To preserve the tenace you lead QD. This gives P the chance to lead through Dec if she can get the lead. Now count the points in Dummy 11 you 6 so Partner has about 10 so plenty of chances. To your surprise P contributes the 2D and S the 3D. Now? It seems Dec has the KD and ducked knowing the suit is wide open. So your P might have Jxx . He must be weak in S you switch to 8S. After that the defence misread the position completely when the AS was taken and H and clubs were cashed. Whole hand now

Not good. While D were lead at other tables nobody else began with the Q.

      

Comment
High Risk, High Reward

I used to subscribe to the American Bridge magazines.The reports on the Bermuda Bowl and the top events were excellent. However I gave them up when they spent so much space decoding the bidding that I lost patience before a card was played. Lurking around the house I located this from the Blue Ribbon pairs. All four were world class. North deals EW vul.

We will see the whole hand from the first.

North passes and East a strong NT passed to West who with his 5 loser and self supporting Spade suit is already thinking slam. He bid a Gerber 4C and North took the opportunity to X. East now passed showing nothing in the suit, and a fearless South 5C. Then 6S and our nerveless man 7C. Doubled of course.

When we look now we can see that 6S +1430 is cold. The AS is lead and South counts his tricks. Five down will be -1100 still a profit . But EW found the uppercut defence. AKS, KAD, AH, then 2D and the 8C becomes the greatest card of the deal. EW +1400. Not quite enough, but above average for NS as not everybody bid the slam.

At this level there is no such thing as risk free!

Comment
Watch the spots!

I did not play at Woodcote last Monday but B4 caught my eye. I have written how high quality defence, requires imagination but it also needs observation. Holmes says to Watson “on the contrary you see everything”. The lower cards tell you so much but platers all to often do not observe. West deals G all.

As dealer you open 1H and North over calls 1S. East can find no bid South supports. You bid H again and 6 players play in S. The board is played 12 times and four go to game. Your partner leads the 2D. Take the West cards and plan the defence after you win AD and N the 5D.

Why has partner not lead your suit? What about the 2D? It cannot be single, the rule of 11 tells you it must be from length. If so why not 4 best?

Decided? Now expose the full hand. The 2D must be a McKenney asking for the lowest suit switch. AD club ruff, Eventually AS and a second ruff. Five tricks for EW. This defence was never found. Nor was the cold 5D for the same side. Watch the spots, they tell you lots.

Comment
Why were they not in game?

We have all got used to computer dealt hands. They produce random deals which occasionally take us by surprise. B9 at Woodcote 9/1, late on after a quiet night I picked up the East cards. North deals and they only are vul. Full hand initially only East . While contemplating my hand I hear 3C on my right. What to do? Decide before reading on.

Double would show interest in all three top suits. I have a two loser giant, major two suits. I need to tell P quickly that I am slam minded – big. I bid 4C, must be majors. N/S silent and P- 4S. Let us see the full hand before proceeding, show full.

It can now be seen that West has all the wrong cards for East. If a club is lead S ruffs and on a H switch gets another ruff. Just 10 tricks. I could now bid 5S guaranteeing 11 tricks. But: with the AD I would not stop with West’s hand.  Anyway I bid 6S, not a success and our only bottom of the night.

But that was not what took me aback. The board was played 11 times On six tables they stopped below game. One South was allowed to play in 5D not doubled! Just two stopped in 4S and made.

Is my completely different valuation of the hand so eccentric?  Dealt it again I would do the same.

Comment
The Two Game Swing

The tactics at teams as opposed to match points should alter your thinking.  Bidding close games at pairs is usually a losing strategy, but at Imps we are bidding 35% games.  The nightmare is the swing when game is made in both rooms.  Two RAC teams met in a league match this week, just 4 imps separated them at the break.  This was the first on resumption:

In Room 1, North opened 1H.  Any one who has read my essay on “what is the opening bid?” will know that I do not approve.  South raised to 2H and West doubled.  North continued to over bid with 4H.  Then passed out and with KH well placed, game made.

Room 2, three passes and 4th hand bid 1S, now a Michael’s 2S would show the red two suits, but contented himself with 2H. East (Howard Wand) now knew that both opponents were minimum, so decided to push his luck with 4S.  This made an overtrick.

What are the lessons here?  At pairs a bottom is just that, but a two game swing is likely a match loser.  Do not be afraid to go one more, it may be a mistake but it is unlikely to be a match decider.

Comment
The Reform

Pre-empt has become far more frequent with on line. The acceleration of artificial systems has fired them up as those systems need space to exchange their meaning. However In return the judgement of a hand’s value and the shorthand of how to react has also become more important. Controls, length and where your high cards are distributed as I have written before is critical . Board 18 from the Reform club 12/12 was this:

Colin F and Howard were one of just two pairs who bid the cold 6S. After two passes West knew that game was unlikely and seeing the vulnerability decided to go the whole hog – 4H.  North could see that almost anything was possible - 7S, 7C, small slams or maybe only black suit games.  After long thought he bid 5S, back to South - this must show 11 winners so with one Ace I would bid 6S. Colin used key card and went to 6S from there.  In the other room old friends Catherine Rice Evans and Rex Goad got a weak (not ‘arf) 2D and North bid 2S (not enough for me) and Rex did not look for the grand 6S.  Who can argue with success?  - not what I expected in either room.

Comment
Seeing is Believing

It was back to work last Monday at Woodcote 2/01 . Just to say I am fully recovered from the choking fit at the Christmas Dinner. I was touched by the good wishes and sympathy from so many of you. It helped.  I have chosen B14 but it requires a belief that what happened was true - it was . Take my East cards as dealer at Love All.

We play 5 card majors and obviously a success with my cards needs a black suit fit. I began with 1C (could be short) and South overcalled 1D West 1H (?)North - 2C and now I could get my second suit in play 2S. 3D and 4H (an 8 card suit with no court cards and every body bidding). Pass - now what? It must be bad suit one honour only Ace ? extreme length . I have shown 11 black cards I cannot possibly want to play in H . I have bid my hand Pass. Instead of a Double  the next bid was 5D and when my turn came I looked at my two Aces - partner must be good for a H trick - double.

Before the lead North said that 2C should have been alerted and was an unassuming cue bid, (should be 3C) I now realised that I could theoretically withdraw my final bid. I also wanted to ask South what she thought the bid meant but that would have been too much! pass.  P began with 4S. Before you see the whole hand what is your defence? 

 

The Spade spots are revealing . There is only the 2S not visible. If partner had the QS it would surely have been lead. Dec has it. Suppose I take and play for a ruff how many trumps has partner got? It could be none, Hearts are clearly dead so to stop an overtrick I cash AC and am mightily relieved when my partner ruffs Swith the bare KD!  Three cards decide the issue! I look at my partners hand no longer shocked. Nobody doubled H and two pairs climbed to 5H, were not doubled and would clearly have fitted in well at Balaclava.  5D was Bid 5 times once doubled and made one bid 6D x but only down one time.  

Yes, I am still in therapy from the 4H bid!"

Comment
Why on earth has he done that?

One of my constant themes over the years has been when Partner makes what appears to be a bad lead, bid, or play do not dismiss it . Ask why has he done this - there should be good reason. Additionally I often say defence needs imagination.  Todays hand combines both of these. East deals and opens with a natural 1C. We will ask you to take the West cards. South overcalls 1S and North bids his D before they arrive in 4S.  You lead 4C and partner plays three rounds when they break 2-2.  Did nobody teach him to avoid giving a ruff and discard?  Look at the whole hand and work out what is in his mind:

On the third C declarer ruffs with the 5S . Knowing that you will overuffed you throw a D. South continues with a trump and QS wins. On the JS East takes his ASand leads the fourth club. Establishing your 10 S for - 1.  Did he know you had the 10S?  No but he had no better ideas. Happy New Year everybody.

Comment
Slam bidding

Looking back it seems that a common thread has been the Circle’s weakness on Slams. It so happened that the last F2F at Pall Mall contained two Grand slams, 15 and 21 . On the first most people bid to and made a Small, with the exception of Henry and Fiona who bid the Grand.  But this was not true on B21 where 7D was cold.  

The first question is should N open 1D? It is so much easier if he does. So 1D - Partner knows immediately that he is going to 6D - 2H game force good suit 2S must be 6-4 - 3D sets suit - 4D no Club control minimum - 4NT - 5D one key now  he can count 12/13 7D.  But the North hand does not meet my criteria so I would pass at the score. South now has a choice. I think it could become unmanageable so would open a game force 2C.  Now N should not waste a round of space with a relay and bid 2S showing where the points are and a positive.  Ok, 3H good suit 4D second suit no help in H must be 6 or why bother?  Now Blackwood gets them to 7D. Only two pairs bid the slam and someone got a bottom having identified the D fit but stopped in 5D. Happy Christmas Tony

Comment
The Pre-empt - the two edged sword

The Pre-empt has become far more frequent with on line. The acceleration of artificial systems has fired them up as those systems need space to exchange their meaning. However In return the judgement of a hand’s value and the shorthand of how to react has also become more important. Controls, length, and where your high cards are distributed as I have written before critical . Board 18 from the Reform club 12/12 was this:

Colin F and Howard were one of just two pairs who did the cold 6S. East passed and S. West after two passes knew that game was unlikely and seeing the vulnerability decided to go the whole hog – 4H. North could see that almost anything was possible 7S 7C small slams or maybe only black suit games. After long thought he bid 5S. Back to South- this must show 11winners so with one Ace I would bid 6S. Colin used Key card and went to 6S from there.  In the other room old friends Catherine Rice Evans and Rex Goad got a weak (not ‘arf) 2D and C bid 2S (not enough for me) and Rex did not look for the grand 6S.

Comment
Just Thirteen Points for a Doubled Game

We played in the Sim at Woodcote on Monday . Perhaps not the wisest thing to do .we forget that Christmas is a stressful time for the Quarter Master . This year strikes we are all facing Post Rail Tube Bus Nurses And Anti Oil road blocks . Anyway that’s our excuse for playing badly.  We did have one triumph:

Two passes and East opened 1S . I looked at the score and thought if we have a fit there ought to be an inexpensive sacrifice. The UNT both minors would mislead as I would not want to play in C.  A simple 2D was my choice 2H - 3D - 4H.  To me now P must have four, they clearly have cold game I think 5D cannot be expensive - 5D round to East who after thought doubles.  AH is lead and on the second H to simplify communications I discharge 2S. They continue AS RUFF.  There is only one way to play it - to AC and up comes the stiff KD. Only 5-2 clubs can defeat me.  In fact all is simple on a Cross Ruff.  

Just 13 points between us + 550 only one other pair; Sally and Paul Found who won on the night.  95% my old themes - fit, shape and controls!  

Comment
Curiouser & Curiouser

Said Alice! In these columns I try to use material from both club houses. I think all of us like to see what happened elsewhere, added fun if you played it! I always look first for competitive hands where both sides have opportunities. Such hands are relatively rare but fascinating when they do occur.

On 28/11 at Woodcote B7 was: Game All. S deals. We will look at the entire hand. I was sitting South.

But true to my principles not quite good enough. Three passes go to East who opens 1D. Now TOX, West has choices, 2C 1S but bid 1NT. Given that S is likely to have majors I would prefer 2C. North 2H. The bid is not forced, this must show values. East – P –I felt that I had bid my hand – pass and was surprised to hear no more. On the AD lead North lost the minor Aces and a S N/S +170.

Now look at the complete hand. 5D/5C are cold. So is 4H. Absolute par is N/S 5Hx –200. A rare sacrifice. The traveller showed a surprising story. 5D x2 4H x2 3Hx5 2H and 3D once each. Who is at fault? If we had gone on the danger is that we goad EW into game. East has grossly undervalued the 4-loser minor hand and must bid again 3C or even 4C.

Comment
Pre-empts a Discussion

The objective of any pre-emptive bid is to use up bidding space that the opponents need to clarify their holdings. B2 at Woodcote 21/11 offered opportunities for all. The whole hand. East deals. N/S vulnerable.

The H void enables two ruffs in East for either S or D. 7D or 7S both make. On the night only one pair bid 6S the rest stopped in game. Let us give EW an uninterrupted auction. East passes and West bids 2C (game force) – 2D (close to a positive) – 2S -3C (suit and values) – 3D (second suit) - 4D (support for second suit, must be four and values) 4NT – 5D (one key) 5NT (pick a slam) 6D – 7D.

Sally & Paul F were the only ones to lose to 6S. East opened 1C (not remotely worth it – but it’s a free country). Paul, South, had decided that 2H at the score.

Comment
One too many Choices.

When you are Declarer, you are often faced with options on how to play. Usually this involves a choice of finesses. Let us look at B 19, 3/11, F2F Pall Mall. We will look at NS hands only first.

South opened the obvious 2NT and North, transferred with 3D –3H. North now has to consider his red length and the singleton club. If he bypasses 3NT to play in D then he more or less has to commit to slam. It continued 4D – 6D. Where was the evidence to justify the 6D? I am assured that is their system. S.10 is lead and the first decision arises. If the finesse wins you can ruff the third round but there is no gain for the ruff. The bidding has shown North to have 10 red cards so he must be short in S. East might want to catch Dec early, but you decide to take the ace. West follows with S8 suggesting the KS. Play on from there. Ready?

You have just 9 tricks on top. The S must be disposed of so the Cub finesse must work, over to AH and the QC wins and the losing S goes on the AC now H loses to the H10 and the 10D returned (watch the spots). You win in dummy and ruff H with KD, West discards a S. Ruff a S and ruff the fourth H with AD. Draw trumps and claim. Two pairs bid the slam and one the impossible 6NT. Nobody made it. Where I watched the S.Q was played and immediate defeat. 

Comment
It’s a Difficult Game!

I have not played for 3 weeks. Recovering from cataract ops. All well! Been kibitzing on - line for material. Of course, with sight of all four hands I never make a mistake. This from the Reform Monday took me aback.

Systems play a part here. South IF they are playing a Weak NT has a borderline opening. Dealer, 8 losers, GA, and just 12 points, the case for a pass is clear. NS if they are allowed, have 9 minor tricks for 3NT. This can be defeated by 5 Hearts and the AS for+200. This looks good until you realise that 4H+1- +650 is there.

At the table I watched, South did open 1NT and West bid 2D, unwise to say the least! The hand has 8 losers and could provoke a bad lead. The suit is not one you wish to declare unless, P has a least AQxx. Worse still it convinces East that you have length and high cards in the suit and unlikely to be of help with his majors. The JD was led to 3NT (surely a H sticks out) and South took his minors for the top score.

Suppose as I recommend West passes and game is again bid, should East take action? Risky of course at the score. If the bidding had gone 1D –P – 2C now a X or a two suited overcall would describe your hand. You could gamble and make a penalty double. But for West on lead what does it mean? An “out of the blue” X must mean do not lead a D and a surprise is called for. I would now in the West seat lead QS. East takes his ace and sees the solid clubs in Dummy and will switch to H. Be careful not to block the suit for +500. The board was played four times 4C 3H +2 4H and 3NT.

Comment
Ros and Bob Bowman Pairs

This annual fixture was won by Paul Weston and Brigitte Battiscombe. Their 64% score was just good enough with three VPs covering the top three. In two sessions of 6 matches I thought the cards a little dull.

Board 15 in Session 2 did catch my eye:

Fay Lucas and partner were the only ones to bid this slam and it was the only one in the entire event! They bid 1H and West came in with 1S and North 2S (UCB good raise) and East X. South conscious of the huge under bid 4NT.5H two keys (must be aces) can now count 11 tricks and went 6H, Nothing wrong with that! As can be seen with the QD finesse winning the play is easy. Note that the fatuous bidding by opponents on broken suits just makes it easier for N/S and advertises the position of KD. Given that the KD must lie under the Q it costs nothing to cash the Ace first a single KH is just about possible.

Comment
The Scissors Coup

Congratulations to the RAC team of 8 who defeated a strong Cambridge Alumni 8 by 20 Imps. Andrew Kisiel drew my attention to this hand. South deals, and EW are vulnerable. The whole hand.

South opened a Weak NT. West 2S (S & minor) and North 3S (H and another) and East 4S. Passed to N – 4NT (pick a suit) – 5C doubled by West – 5D – converted to 5H by N and doubled by W.

The trouble with artificial auctions is that if you listen carefully both sides have a blueprint. East after thought found the excellent lead of JD. Andrew could see that the danger was that he would lose a H, S, and a D ruff. He ran the QC hoping to avoid the S loser.

Quick to spot his mistake, he realised that he had missed the winning play. AC QC discard the spade.

The play. first written up by Culbertson (The Red Book) who called it “the coup without a name”. Not like him to be short of words! But Terence Reese wrote later “The Scissors Coup” because it snipped the communications.

Comment
Thursday night at Pall Mall

Board 3 in the f2f was this hand. We will see the whole from the start – nobody at the time had that privilege!

The Dealer can hardly resist a 3S pre-empt. But at the vulnerability with zero defence there is a case for the whole hog – 4S. Let us assume 3S the normal, but not universal choice. A double now would be for Tout so West should pass it to East who doubles. This left in should go for at least – 1100. Looks good for EW until you realise that 6NT or 6D are cold. David Mannnooch avoided the pre-empt and the S lead. His partner was able to open 1S and they wound up in 6NT. He commented that another pair bid to the good 6D. Was this a case for a Lightner X? I think not. Spades are very likely to be lead, and it advertises the trump

Comment
Benjamin 2 Bids

in 1950 SJ Simon published “Design for Bidding” the definitive book on the Acol system. A chapter covered the two bids. 2C was a game force 23+. 2D 2H 2S showed 8 playing tricks with the designated suit as trumps. At the time the weak two was sweeping America and the all - purpose 2C was born, widely played today. The weakness of that bid is that it covers too many possible hands and is vulnerable to the pre-empt. Simon concluded his chapter saying that the weak two was a dangerous weapon, but he was reluctant to forfeit the 8 playing trick bids “maybe I am wrong”. The debate lead, to a Scot Albert Benjamin, proposing: 2D became the Acol 2C. 2C became the 8 playing tricks but an unspecified suit. The Majors could now be weak. The weak 2D was forfeit. 

Marina and I play Benjamin and I was sleeping when I picked up the West hand. B5 Woodcote.

I opened 1D – 1S and then I realised that 3D was amassive underbid but dare not go beyond 3NT.   Marina took the gamble and went 3NT, she got a H lead and rattled all 13 tricks for a totally undeserved top. Our system was perfect I was not!

2C (8 playing tricks) 2S (positive decent suit, probably an Ace and King.) - 3D – 4D – 4NT – 5D (one key) 6D. Nobody bid the slam.

Comment
Cafe Pairs

The Café Pairs walking between venues was won by Paul Thornton of the Athenaeum and Gary Diamond of the MCC. A sound experienced pair always likely to be competitive in an event like this. The event was placed in jeopardy by 20 cancellations – Covid - on the days before, well done to the Chairman and team for frantic telephoning to fill gaps. I counted 5 RAC pairs in the top ten.

There was some dreadful bidding and play on B2. We will see the whole hand.

East deals N/S Vul

The board was played 25 times. 4x in 6NT, -1 three times. I counted 5C 4S 2D and KH. I can only conclude that the unsuccessful declarers funked the H finesse. This, a complete top. The safest contract protecting KH is 6S by South. If a H is not lead two D ruffs will give

the overtrick. A couple of bidding sequences were reported to me, both from 5 Card majors and silent opponents.

Auction1, 1D –1S– 2NT – 3C – 4S. Why do people distort their hands in this way searching for 4 card majors? The effect is to disguise the importance of KJC.

Auction 2, 1D – 2C – 3NT - 4NT – 6NT well at least they were a scratch pair and played it properly.

My Auction? 1D (four card M) 2C – 2S (reverse forcing to game) – 4S – 4NT –5S 2keys and QS - 6S.

Comment
Old Thoughts Revisited

I have written before, when your partner is very strong, (convey this soonest) responder is usually weak. But how weak? Length in a suit and a couple of Qs can be exactly what he needs for a slam. You must convey that to him. Secondly when responding to a TO X let’s say 1S – X- Pass. Your bid now is forced. Two Clubs could now bid on nothing. If you are better than that, you must find a way of saying so.

B13 GA. North deals, take Easts’ cards on 29 Sept.

You are thinking another pass, when North opens 3D. Pass of course, so does South and Partner doubles. Your bid? How good is P? he could have protected on a Weak NT, 12+, or he is unlimited, with the other three suits. North is Vulnerable so is likely to hold a solid 7+ suit with no defensive tricks. South has not increased the barrage. P must be good??? If you now bid 3H you are saying I cannot do more. A 4H bid looks a bit far fetched, you say - 3H. Back to P, 4D! (agrees H guarantees game) and he is big. Now you have shown him no values so a rebid of 4H simply confirms that. I think 5H (I have a good suit). Time to see the whole hand.

Partner bids 6H and with the KS well placed. Takes the lot. On the night nobody bid it

Comment
Trump Control – The 4- 3 fit.

The most difficult exercise in trump control can be the 4-3 fit. It usually occurs when you would have liked to play in NT but find you are wide open in one suit. The first thing to understand is the break percentages.

4-2 48% 3-3 36% and the remainder 16%. Take the top two out and it is 57-43. One opponent has as many as you. Opponent’s logical defence will be to force your suit and establish their long card as a winner.

An old example will make it clear:

South conscious of his H weakness plays in 4S and receives QH lead. Provide trumps are no worse than 4-2 and control is not lost to H forces, it’s easy. Draw just two rounds of trumps and play a D. They win their ace and play another H; but you discard a Club, and you have QH in dummy to take the third round.

Comment
Trump Control 2 The Lone Winner

Last week’s column was on this subject and sparked a little interest. Thought I might do a series. I wrote last   week of the futility of knocking out a certain winning trump in opponents’ hands. Here is a practical example from 1948!

South played in 4S. The bidding and opening lead were the same in both rooms KC and South ruffed the second round. In R1 he crossed to KS and finessed the JS losing to the QS who continued with a third club and Declarer has lost control.

In R2  South again ruffed the second Club but now ignored the finesse cashing AKS and switching to diamonds, West could take his QS, AD but that was it.

Comment
Trump Control

Some of the most common mistakes one sees involve trump control. You are in a 5-4 fit and guess the Q wrong. Many players knock it out immediately, drawing two of their own trumps for the loss. It must make, all we are discussing is when. Often Trumps are the safest entries between Dec hands. Played too early you forfeit communication. Overtricks are regularly lost in this way. This one came up in an international match.

East opened 1H and South 2S 3H -3S and S stopped in game. In R1 South ruffed the opening lead and played three rounds of trumps. Three D were then lost. In R2 in the same Contract, South again ruffed the H and played the 10S for 11 tricks.

Comment
Opening Leads Are Crucial

At Woodcote on Monday 5/9 in need of points. I decided to push my luck on B20 leaving the long suffering, Marina to play it.

The whole hand: West deals Game all. I was South.

After 3 passes I opened 1H (5 cards) Partner 1S & they came in with 2D. The well placed KD, decided me to up value my hand with a splinter - 4C. North now felt she had a maximum for her pass and therefore wished to encourage - 4D. I looked at my Aces and KD. We needed points - 6S. After long thought East began with Ace and another Diamond.

 How to play it?

Assuming Spades behave, we have, 5S, 2H, 1D, I Club Three club ruffs needed, but while KH and a D ruff will allow two entries to North. We lack a key back to draw trumps. There are other hopes. KD drop a Club AC - D ruff, and a club ruff. AS, and the QS drops from West. East has 10xx trumps and 5 or more Diamonds. Over to KH and a second Club ruff but the KC does not fall. The only hope now is that West has KC and at least four H. Trump from Dummy and when all are cashed, as can be seen West is squeezed in H&C. Nobody else bid and made the slam.

Can it be beaten? Repeated H leads breaks up the connections and probably so does trump leads. The AD (not best lead) rectifies the count for Declarer and gives the timing.

Hard work! 

Comment
Signals. The Alarm Clock

Signals are vital in defence. The picture is not always clear. Time, is limited and understanding in casual partnerships can be muddled. The other day my partner lead the KD and four small showed in dummy. I held D.J109 and needed to play. The important thing was to deny the Q so I played JD. But partner took this as encouraging and underlead AD to QX. I pointed out that had I got the QD I would have played it for the underlead.

This deal came up 27 years ago, in a high stake game. Take the West seat and see dummy.

They bid 1NT (15-17) 2C- 2D -2S- 3NT-4H – 4S.

You decide to lead 2C.  Dummy, plays AC and Partner the QC. South continues with AS and another to your KS. Think what you play now before reading on.

What do you make of QC? Dec has shown 5-5 majors. It cannot be a singleton. When partner makes a totally unexpected play do not say “he has gone mad” ask yourself why? He is trying to tell you something. What is it?

It is an unnecessary high card – a McKenny for a H switch. Time to see the whole hand. A Heart lead for East to cash AK and give you ruff while you still have a trump.

Comment
Signals. The Alarm Clock

Signals are vital in defence. The picture is not always clear. Time, is limited and understanding in casual partnerships can be muddled. The other day my partner lead the KD and four small showed in dummy. I held D.J109 and needed to play. The important thing was to deny the Q so I played JD. But partner took this as encouraging and underlead AD to QX. I pointed out that had I got the QD I would have played it for the underlead.

This deal came up 27 years ago, in a high stake game. Take the West seat and see dummy.

Comment
Everybody Missed This One

This was B18 at Woodcote on 22 Aug. East dealt at N/S only vulnerable and we will see the whole hand.

The traveller shows that it was played 12 times, and nobody advanced beyond 4H. One pair stopped in 3H giving all others an above average score. As can be seen, 12 tricks are available with two club ruffs. If D are no worse than 4-1 a discard for the losing spade appears. 6H is cold, with everything breaking, the Grand makes.

The Bidding.

Should East open? My view – No! it is borderline, and I would bid it 3rdin hand. With NS silent it might go Pass – 1D (5 losers 18 points but all AKs) East has an old Acol bid - 2H (good suit max pass) Surely you cannot miss from there. But let us assume just 1H – 4C (slam try agrees, H shortage) – 4NT RKCB- 5D 1or4 – 5S I have the KS – anything else? Yes, 6D  Now you can count 13 tricks with a bit of luck

Tell partner as soon as you can that you are slam minded. Give P max information

Comment
Competitive hands win matches

Bridge becomes challenging when both sides have opportunities. In teams the dreaded “two game swing” scares us all. At pairs the “phantom sacrifice”. Once the four level Rubicon, is crossed, it is often the weakest hand at the table that becomes the most important. Why? because it is the unknown.

Take the North cards here. Game All.  South deals.

South opens 4S and puts the stop card down, West pauses and pauses again, when it is lifted but passes.  After two passes East bids 5D – Pass - 5H. Suddenly you have become the key bidder. Your move. The options are: pass, Double, 5S. The old adage “the five level belongs to the opposition” comes to mind. As dealer vul, S may be pre-empting his own partner. You can count on him having a solid S suit no great defensive values and 8 winners. So with your AD it should be, no worse than-500. What about them? The hesitating West to take out his partners free bid must have a good six hearts. East, the last to speak may be protecting his partner’s pass. Given you are looking at the ace of his suit should be six. South could have a Singleton does he have any kind of help in clubs? The opposition contracts may be makeable

You have all the info – decide. At the table North went 5S and all passed. See full hand.

South is borderline for his bid. Was, East influenced by the hesitation? As can be seen, on AH lead South must lose the minor suit tricks. 5H is cold – 100 is very near top score. Tough hand.

Comment
Training one of the RAC Teams

As some of you know, I work with the Elite Team - so named after the Lotus Elite Car. I mis analysed this difficult hand. We will look first only at NS, N deals Game all.

The bidding after discussion was 1D – 1H – 1S – 3C - 3D – 4NT (RKCB) -5D (one key) 6S. The AC was lead, (not best –to 2 & 6) and East switched to 6S.

Plan the play. Count the tricks, 4S 3C and 3 top reds makes ten. If D behave there are more than enough, If QH wins, and a H ruff also does it. Nobody likes taking a finesse in a slam. In training Dec took AS returned to QS and took the H finesse for one down.

The hand is about discovery. Where are the missing key cards? At the table I too missed the best line. Simple when you see it. It is a Dummy reversal if you can ruff two H you are home.

Run 6S (10 is better) to the 8S when the 9 or10 do not appear they must be 4-1. It now looks as if East has 4-5/6 in the majors. If he has KH he might have scraped up a 1H overcall.  So the finesse will lose. Now AH and a ruff and the K appears, ruff and home. Show full hand

 As can be seen the D finesse succeeds but the 5-1 break needs managing. It is about choice of options. Perhaps if N had not bid his scruffy S suit and just 2D South would have played the hand. Somehow the play is easier to see from there.

Comment
Another use for the Lightner Double

Board 3 at Woodcote threw up this hand. We will see it all from the first. South deals EW vulnerable.

South opened 1H and North responded 1S*. South 1NT – 2NT and South went on to game. This was passed to East. Before he could bid S, put his bidding cards back in the box and East protested that he had yet to bid! NS have shown marginal values and no fit. A double now asks W to lead the first suit bid by the dummy. East took the view that there was no hope of defeating the game unless a S was lead so doubled – Lightner.

West lead AS and when South showed void discarding 5H, continued with 8S covered by 9S caught the 10S and another H. South must have both minor AQ to justify the bid, so partner has got to have AH before the minors run. West won AH and played a third S. Defence scored +800. This led to an interesting EW discussion. The S suit runs if the 3S is lead. But West argued that with AH it was best to show the crucial unknown AS, I think that correct. At another table the 7S was lead and the H switch not found.

*This is a ghastly bid and the start of the trouble. This slavish desire to bid 4 card majors no matter what, distorts the hand. A simple 2Cshows 9+ points a playable suit minimum. 1NTwith a void opposite not wise. 2D now and North passes

Comment
Hand Valuation. Another Slam Miss!

Lester accused me recently of “banging on about slams”!

Guilty as charged.

It remains a major Circle weakness. Board 8 Pall Mall 30 June, West deals.

The full hand was: After two passes East opened.

The board was played 6 times. Four in 4S (only 2 made 13 tricks) once in 3D. When KD drops, 7S is cold.

What do you open as East?

I suspect that all started with 1D and continued 1S – 3C – 3H - 4S. The big mistake is the first bid. East has four losers = there is no way he is stopping below game. Say so - 2C ! (N/S silent). Depending on methods, W responds 2D (or 2S). Over 2D - 3D now 3S (must be 5) 4H (cue) 4S (for sure) – 6S. The key is to recognise how little is needed opposite for a slam.  

Comment
Common Declarer Mistakes

One of many mistakes surrounds the trump suit. Drawing trumps too soon, and as a result squeezing the dummy. Use up valuable entries too soon. Perhaps the worst is establishing a certain winner, knocking it out, taking two of your own trumps with it. This was Board 10 at the Reform 20 June. North deals Love All.

North opened 1S and South responded 2C West came in  with 2D. North has an awkward bid. He would like to play 3NT but has no D stop, or 4S if S has 3 small. He bid 2H to leave all options open and was raised to 3H. While this showed 4 card support with his flimsy suit, he bid 5C. Showing 5-4-4-0.

The JS was lead.

So S are 4-2 and surely AD plus most of the high cards are in West. AS wins and the QC finessed and the AC cashed  A certain loser now in trumps. All follow to KS and 4S is ruffed. West will not overruff because he does not want to open either red suit. AH and play S discarding D with the H finesse winning they can only make KC and AD. At the table Dec went -2. Infuriating, when 3NT is cold for 10 tricks when the H behave.

Show all

Comment
The Squeeze. The Play - Chapter 3

In Ch 2 we reached the point where North plays in 7NT on the lead of JC. We counted tricks to 11 and accepted that we needed 12 to rectify the count, Therefore we have to finesse the 8C to achieve that.

Play on:

When embarking on a squeeze you need to envisage the end position to which you are aiming. It must be:

 

                                      S. A843

                                      H.9

              S.J10762          D.106                    S. …..

              H.J                   C.5                        H…...

              D.87                S.KQ9                    D.QJ95

             C,….                H…..                      C.10832

                                      D.A

                                      C.AK98 

Of course, you do not know this; but it is the winning distribution you need. North now takes the club finesse, cashes AD and continues clubs. West the D8 can go but the KC forces him to unguard a major.   

To get to this position North must play the cards in a particular order conscious, that communication between the hands is essential. The key is the club finesse which has to be taken late. Win QC, AKH, KD, QH discard 5S. and now the cub in the position above.

West must explain to his team mates how the Grand was made. W Defends himself. JC lead gave it away!

But hopefully lesson(s) is learned.   

Comment
The Squeeze Capter 2

We saw in Chapter 1 North South bid to 7S and were doubled by West. North took the view that they had a certain trump trick and moved to 7NT. Not doubled and received the JC lead, won by the QC.

How do you play it?  Spades were not lead so it looks like they are 5-0. Count tricks, Three Spades, three hearts, two D but; the lead suggests Clubs will only supply three more. We are two short.

A Squeeze. “the forcing of unspareable discards”

A Triple squeeze will produce two tricks. It requires one hand to have guards in three suits. He is forced to unguard one of them, and the gained winner squeezes him again to collect one more. Spades needs West to throw two. D must have QJ together and one more.

We can rule out the triple. The combination of cards is too farfetched. We need to find a 12th trick to bring us within one of our contract, “to rectify the count”. That can only come from Clubs, so we assume 10C lies with JC and the suit does not break. East could be squeezed in the minors, if he holds D.QJX plus the clubs. West with four H and the S also. Which to go for?

Decide on your play from here and the answer will be given in Chapter 3 on Friday!

Comment
Do not double Slams - Chapter 1

Readers will surely have noted that I have always advised Defenders not to double slams.  The arithmetic shows that you gain 50/100 points but lose (say) 180 plus the 100 and risks a redouble. The double should be used for the direction of a lead without which you believe the slam will succeed – Lightner X. There is one more. Declarer warned of a bad break may switch to another contract which succeeds. This one came up at the Reform 27 June. The story is complex and will require three columns. The full hand is here from the first.  

N/S played Benjamin Acol. After two passes South opened 2D (Acol 2C). North immediately knows they are in the slam zone. It can be difficult to catch up if you do not make a positive response. Despite only four North bids 2S and South agrees the suit -3S. 4D (second feature, KD surely) 4H (cue) 4NT (RKCB) - 5D (one or 4 keys) must be three aces and KS. Fifteen points, he has 23 in all. North looks at his two unbid Q’s and decides to go directly to 7S.

All pass to West who doubles. Ouch! South must have only four Spades and West, have a certain trump trick. 7S will not make. North with nothing to lose, switches to 7NT.  All pass, the JC is lead. With benefit of Double dummy how do you play it? Next week we will consider the choices.

 Chapter 2 will be published on Tuesday.  Chapter 3 on Thursday evening!

 

Comment
Play Another with Me

The Reform club 27June Game All South deals.

South opened a Weak NT and West came in with 2S (horrible -1100 x) but it gave me a difficult bid. Anything is possible 3NT or 6NT 4H or more etc. We had not been playing well and needed points. I decided to gamble 6D. East lead JS, covered and the KS eliminated my S loser. (Serve him right) I have 6 trumps, if they break, 2H and a H ruff plus 2spade winners AC. Cash AKD and West shows out. A certain trump loser so now the H finesse must win, and does, Cash AH and the 10H falls from West. AC and a ruff, in hand. JH covered and ruffed with JD another C ruff concede the D and claim +1370. Show hand.

Better to be lucky than good!

Comment
Tough Start with the French

On the site is a report on our match v Auto Club de France. The team of 12, performed well so congrats.. Great to renew the fixture after a 2 year Covid interval. Our thanks to them and they come to us in 2023.

This was Board 1 and we will see the whole hand with RAC – N/S. Love all North deals.

The Bidding (without comment) was: 1S (5card majors) Double -  Redble  - 2H. Then with opponents silent:3D- 3H (game force, agrees S) 3S - 4NT -5H (2 keys. no QS) – 6S. The AH was lead and the 6S followed. Declarer ruffed a D for the 12th trick but then lost to 10S. Unlucky (3-2 trumps) and very tough start.

The Bidding – my opinions!

I would not open 1S if P responds 2H you must bid 3D, which                                   

you are not worth, or repeat the weak S suit showing six.

 Nor as South would I redouble. This shows a desire to punish Oppos whereas you like S. A simple 2C is best. Nor can I explain the strange RKCB reply.

The  Play.

The slam can be made. On the defence offered. After the trump switch North cashes a second round and discovers the 4-1 break. Now Declarer knows that the JS cannot be used to ruff. The only hope is the ruffing finesse of JH when this is lead it is covered and ruffed back to JS. AC, QS. Drawing the last trump, overtake JC and claim.

My thanks to Marina and Terry for the hand and I hope that my next time with the first board will not be as difficult.

  

Comment
Another Grand Missed

Board 23 on 9 June at Pall Mall was disappointing. We will just look at the EW hand V silent opponents. Game All and South passes as dealer.

The Board was played four times in NT. Once stopping in 3NT and all others in 6NT +1. I do not know the various auctions; but I suspect that both sides rushed instead of just telling P what they had.

West has a four loser hand, and opens 1S. East (5 losers) must bid an old fashioned game force 3C. Now both players know they are in the slam zone. 3D second suit not minimum 3H advance cue bid (I like your suits) 4D (5-5) 4NT (RKCB agrees D)-5H 2 Keys. 5S do you have QD ? Yes 6C 6H 6S 7NT

Comment
Spots are Important

Last week I wrote about the importance of Spot cards. Nowhere is this more critical than in part score play. B11 at the Reform 6 June threw up this hand and we will see the full deal: South deals Love All.

The board was played 2x2S -2 and -3. Then 2NT +1 and -2, 2H made 3NT -3. I watched one Dec, South  in 2NT, he got a Spade lead to KS and East realising there were not enough tricks in the suit switched to 2D. S put up the AD and AH drew the Q. You now know the suit. Would anybody throw QH voluntarily? He continued with the 2H and a sleeping West followed 4H. But Dec was also asleep and played the 10H. He went two off. If Dec cashes all his H he squeezes his own hand.

Go back and this time play 2H by South after a transfer sequence. The 10S is lead and East can see it is a singleton. If he releases both top honours too soon he establishes S winners for Declarer so he underleads 2S ( McKenney for C) and the ruff is taken . Now 4C is lead. If the Ace is taken Dec has two club tricks. East must play the 9C.

I will stop here, running out of space. My point is that an innocent part score throws up endless variations and the spot cards become of vital importance. Either as winners or as minimizing losers.

When playing in attack or defence after the lead is exposed. Do not turn your cards over until you have considered the possible implications of each spot.

Comment
Strategic Planning

Last week I wrote about the challenge Declarers face when dummy goes down. You are faced with a choice of plays. A more complicated example this week dates from 1963! N/S Vul West deals. You play in 4H. The bidding has gone, 1D passed to you in S, 2H – 3H from North, you go to game. All follow to AD lead and 10C follows, plan the play. This is what you see:

Count your tricks: Seven trumps and two aces add to nine. Winning finesses in the black suits make eleven. East passed his partners opening bid so he cannot have both. If West had both knowing H are solid, would he switch to C? Take AC and lead 10D discarding your last C. West leads a C to Q & K and you ruff. Draw trumps ending in Dummy and on the third D throw 3S losing to West. Now the last D is good for a S discard and your tenth trick. Show all. 

Your weakest suit gives best! 

Watch the spots,

Comment
Coaching Again

I worked for the first time for a while with the RAC ELITE league team. MB Sally &Paul, David. I am quite hard on them, but they seem to endure and ask me back.

This one defeated us, including me. We will see the whole hand.

The hand was well bid by Sally (S) and Paul. Traditional methods. 2C (game force) 2D (relay but denies positive) 2NT (23/4 balanced) 3C (stayman) 3H – 3NT – 4S. Paul thought for some time but decided that Q high was not worth more. Seeing the whole, we can see that 6S can be made. It is marginal but at pairs the overtrick is key. West after thought, lead the 10S to KS. Red finesses are essential but which first? H needs twice but it seems there is only one entry to dummy. Draw trumps ending in dummy and lead a to QH. West seeing the limited entries should duck. Now AH (discover the break) JH loses to KH and use final trump to ruff the loser. QD and when they behave claim.

Should it be bid? I am no mathematician but think it a bit worse than 50%. As we can see the play is not quite as simple as it looks. Also it is the weak hand opposite the monster that has the answers.   

Comment
Last Board at Woodcote

It is the last playing with Marina, I have had bad cards all night. We have a winning score. We are Vulnerable and I pick up the East hand as dealer.

I dislike distortion. I have a four loser, hand - slam minded – need a fit, so 1D, silent opponents. 2C – 2S forcing. In previous weeks we have agreed that you do not support the second suit without four. Long hesitation and 3S. Now ethics come into play with four there would be no hesitation, so I know she has only three. I am not entitled to this info so must bid on the basis she has 4. (3C-3S (5-6 ) 4S is how it should have gone) I decided to go 6S and thought I spotted a slight smile from South at this action. So, he has the KS, reinforced by the prompt AH lead. Show all.

I see Dummy, I ruff with 2S. There are plenty of tricks if the minors behave. I am sure the KS is offside, it is all about trump control. I decide to check clubs. JC is finessed – wins! (should, be covered, N may have 9xxx) AD ruff a D and run JS loses as I thought to KS who to prevent another D ruff continues with 4S. I overtake 10S, draw trumps and claim the minors.

At this point and throughout the play friends are greeting all the players. I appeal for silence. I discover we are the only pair to bid and make the slam.

In the calm I look at the hand again and realise that if South plays another H when in with KS, I must lose a second trump.

Yes, four trumps are needed to support the second suit.

Comment
The Four Card Major Obsession

Five card major openings, seen in the 30’s now back in fashion. SAYC, Big Club etc. This is now used with a short Club or “better minor”. When a short Club is opened, it has led to an obsessive response, to bid a four card major. If you have one or to deny one if not. I have seen players distorting their hand in order, to bid S.9543 as opposed to 1D with KJ643. The nine high suit is useless unless Partner holds at least Hxxx, in which case they are able, to bid it themselves. Worse still it is a good way to attract a defensive lead you do not want, or force P with a superior hand to be Dummy.

This hand B17 from Woodcote provoked a long -standing disagreement between my partner and I.

Love all North deals and N/S are silent.  

Playing a strong NT East opened 1C and West 1D. This in East’s view denied 4H so instead of a 1H rebid with two wide open suits bid 1NT (12-14). Passed out. South found the unfortunate lead of 3C. Declarer guessed right, played low and three club tricks were there. Decplayed a H and discovered the 4-1 break, but still landed 3C, 2H, 2D and 1S. +120 beating the +110 for 2H and a top.

My view is unchanged if both sides make their natural bids. Do not distort their hands, 2H is the final contractby East. The unfortunate club lead demonstrates, the old adage, that more contracts are made in NT that should not be made.

I suggest that readers have a think, and I would be most interested in their views.

Comment
The Limit Bid and the Losing Trick Count

Back in the 50’s the late great Harrison Gray wrote about these. On the first he said, bid your hand to its limit and thereafter respond only to Partners’ forcing bids. The second is a way of evaluating your hand. How good am I? Suits are assumed to be four cards. So Kxxx is two losers as are Kxxxx(x). Q are assumed to be third round winners but, if counted must be “balanced” by an Ace held elsewhere. I have written before how Milton Work count over values the Q.

The magic number is 18. So 7 losers is probably an opening bid. Opposite 7 more adds to 14. Deduct from 18, leaves 4 and you are in the game zone. Five opposite 7 and you are in the slam zone. Of course, all this must be taken in the round. Controls, fit and playing tricks all come into play.

Nobody advanced beyond the four level on B7 last Thursday at P Mall South dealt at game all. The full hand was:

At one typical table South (7 losers) passed. West (4 losers)1C North  (4 losers), with a difficult bid, high playing strength, 18 points, chose to double, passed to South 2H – 2S – 4H. A routine safety play in H and there are13 on top.

I will add no further comment.

Comment
The High Wire

Competitive decisions at high level have decided many a match. It was the last board in pairs. I dealt as East and only our opponents were vulnerable. My hand was:

What do I open? My first thought was 4D but the KS could be the clincher in say 3NT. I chose 1D – 1S - 2D-

3D from North (game raise in S) and now it is probably their board. I will not let them play 4S so - 5D immediately to put them under pressure. South doubles. West passes and North after long thought 5S. My view in these situations is, I have gone to the limit, so has my Partner. I must assume that I have done the damage and got them too high – pass. But Partner bids 6D, me (cursing silently) the decision is mine.

The 7D is lead and let’s see the entire hand:

Show All

I win the ten and exit with JH. South wins KH and plays another trump to QD. Ruff a H with JD, ruff a C and ruff the third round of H . South who now knows the whole hand concedes. Shape, fit, and controls are what the hand demonstrates. N\S can make 6S and cash the major suit aces.

 The bidding:

The low opening was best. I do not like the 3D bid. N has no defence and I think a straight 4S is in order. When the bidding comes back to East over 5S It should pass. The hand has been bid.

But who will argue with success?  

Comment
Desperate Times Desperate Measures

All eyes are on the defence of Ukraine by its courageous people and leader. They cannot win. They have not the conventional resources nor the manpower. They are playing for stale mate at best. But some successes have been possible. It happens at the Bridge Table all the time.

Take the East seat here and you pick up at Game All:

Worse than last week! Partner deals and opens 1H two passes follow and South bids 1S. Partner rebids - 2H and North the UACB – 3H South goes to game 4S. The AH is lead and you follow with? Remember you are desperate. The 2 (discourage shows 3 small) but you try 8H and the KH continues. Declarer ruffs the third round with 9S and plays a trump to the K and Ace.

Show all hands.

Partner is as desperate as you and wonders why you have mislead him. Light dawns and he plays a 4th H you make the uppercut with the 10S and West’s 8S becomes the setting trick.

Watch the spots!

Comment
Stay Awake For The Last

It is the last board and you have scored 54%, cannot win now. A routine hand and tea awaits you hope. You are North reinforced in that view when you see your hand. West deals at Game All and opens 1H, your hand:

It continues, Pass - 2H (with no defence and 7 losers an immediate 4H is best). South now comes to life 3H!! Dbl (why bother) and you must act. Sounds like black two suiter. He could have doubled. The only card of value is KS - so 3S (all fingers crossed) – 4H- 4S all pass. A H is lead. Time to see the full hand.

You ruff in Dummy and consider your strategy. Looks like 5C 4S and AD. Is there an overtrick? It transpires are the only North declarer. If you can ruff THREE H then there is the extra trick but the first two gain nothing. Look again at the club suit. The fourth round of clubs blocks the suit, so entries need care. Are the trumps 3-2? Their failure to go one more suggests that they are. The old principle – save the double honour for the second round applies. JS and a slight hesitation, says he has the AS. You play another and he ducks (fatally) again KS wins. Ruff second H, start cashing C. West cannot ruff before the fourth round. But it is too late.

A most unusual dummy reversal. 100% but as I said too little too late.

 

Comment
Again &Again Slams

Lester accused me recently of “harping on about slams”. Guilty, as charged, at teams getting the slams wrong usually guarantees a loss. This hand came up at Woodcote. We will see the full deal, East deals and N/S only are vul.

Systems play a part here. With a strong NT maximum East has an easy 1NT decision, but he has now limited his hand. West with his 6 card, suit and 6 loser hand knows, they are in the slam zone (partner does not), The board was played 12 times and no pair found the cold 6S. only one pair bid slam in 6H. The primary reason, if one looks at the auctions is the lack of imagination by West(s) who looked no further than 4S. Failure to mention H and locate the double fit – tell Partner your hand!

I think it should proceed: 1NT – 2H (transfer) – 4H (must 5-5 or 6-4) forcing. Now opener knows that his minor A. AK cover the losers and with his major fillers can now use Blackwood and bid slam in 6S.

Let’s try it with a weak NT.  1C- 1S- 1NT (15-17) -3H (game force) – 3S (4S would be a sign off) 4NT (RKCB) – 5C – 0-3keys 6S.

Yes, very easy when you both tell P your hand.

Comment
Well Bid and Well Played

This was B2 at Woodcote. I was playing with Marina. Strong NT, 5 card majors. North deals EW only vul.

The system helps here. East opened 1D (must be 4) and got the reply 1H. The 6 loser hand is clearly worth 3H and West knows that they have a double red fit. Also first round control in S and second round in Clubs. 4NT (RKCB) – 5C (three keys) – 6H.

The QD is lead. Plan the play. Where is the QH? When Oppos make an unusual lead the reason is often that they are trying to find a setting trick to add to one for which they have hope. The likely holder is North. However if you take the finesse and it loses they will surely play another and with only nine tricks on top the small trumps are very important. Marina eschewed the finesse. Took the AD KS KH AH leaving the Q high and dry. AQS throwing D. Now KD ruff establishes the suit AC ruff a club and play D. North takes the winner when he wants. One other pair bid and made the slam. Elegantly played.

Points to remember.

  1. Trumps are often the most secure conveyance.
  2. A double fit gives huge playing strength.

Comment
More Than One Way to….

When we pick up our cards for the first time, we hope for a vanilla board to let us settle. This was B1 at the Dutch Club. Love all, North deals.

You can imagine the feeling when East picked up this monster. North passed and East bid a game force 2C. At one table, South -2 spades and all passed back to East - 3H (good suit). West who has shown nothing can now bid 4D. A double negative would be 3NT so surely this is Kxxxxx? Now count tricks. 6D 2S two possible club ruffs and 1H adds to 11, There must be a 12th there somewhere - 6D.

When you become Declarer – unexpectedly - deciding on your plan to make can be difficult. Here there a several ways in which the slam might be made. On the 7S lead Declarer used the same arithmetic. But decided to try to ruff C. Presumably hoping the H finesse would work. But in the light of the bidding this looks unlikely. The trouble with Club ruffs is they are available any time and sure winners. No gain.

He won the first Spade. Ruffed clubs and eventually lost to KH. The bidding advertises that any missing high cards are in South. The H finesse is 50% but the odds that H will divide 4-3 is 62%.

So AS, AH ruff a H and if no honour appears take AQD and ruff another when the KH comes down – claim. On the day nobody found this play including the one pair who bid the slam.

Comment
The Two Suit Overcall

As systems become more artificial, pre-empts have become bolder and more frequent. A look at the recent Lederer will confirm my premise. Sally and I played in the Dutch club pairs 15/3. This was B3 E/W vul and S dealt, opened a weak 2S. Let us see the whole deal.

Sally has a difficult bid. What would you do? She would like to bid 2NT showing minors but in our occasional system that would be natural showing a strong NT. She bid 3C N at the vulnerability 3S and I was in trouble. When opponents pre-empt in S it is usually because they want to stifle H. Who wants to play in 5C with 4H available? I bid 4H. Now Sally who does not know my minor suit holdings has to guess. After long thought she passed. Marina and Terry bid the same way, but West took out to 5C made for the top. I lost AS and three trumps. All in the South hand.

Let us go back to the bid over 2S. You want to play in a minor fit but which one? I hate distortion but I think I prefer 3D and revert to 5C at the game level. Given the 2NT is not available. How about 3NT? Must be minors.

“Suppose partner does not read this and passes” said Sally. “It’s cold I said!”

Why do we play this game?

 

Comment
It looks easy but it is not!

A couple of my long- term themes have been, playing strength and the power of Aces. Following my own advice, I would have got this one wrong at the Dutch club on Tuesday. The full hand. North deals N/S vul.

The board was played 5 times, 3x3NT going off once, with 9 on top. 5D and 6NT the last making ona club lead from East. I suspect that on the opening bid of 1H – 2D – 2NT I could not have resisted a Grand in either D or NT. As can be seen the 0-4 d break scuppers both unless you have second sight, and it would surely lead to an interview with the EBU ethics committee. 6D can be made on the best lead of a S. Win, draw3 trumps, and finesse QH discard the 10S and claim. If you had been South, your big mistake was sitting down.  

Comment
An Early Blunder

On the website Marina has related the result of the recent encounter with the AELTC, I played with Colin an infrequent partnership which showed up in the first half. But our partners gave us a single point lead at the half. This was Board 3. The full deal. S deals. EW vul.

After 3 passes I opened 1NT (15-17) and was raised to game. S lead 10C, no need to take an early decision so won the AC and played 2D, a D back discovered the 4-1 break. I decided to lose that trick and got a S return. ducked twice. Now 5H to K return  to JH finesse wins but the fall of the 10 gave me the complete count. I know clubs are 4-3 so I thought the club finesse was right all the time and took it for -2 and -13 IMPs. Colin pointed out that if I exit with a heart N is end played. Correct.

Sitting in an armchair at after a better, 2nd half the solution leapt out at me. We are playing teams overtricks do not matter.

A simple book safety play does it. KD and another towards the A9. If nothing appears run the 9.

Comment
The Power of the Single Queen

The late Bob Sharples once said to me “did nobody tell you about the power of the singleton Q”. What he meant was, it can so often create a stop or a blocking mechanism in NT. Opposite say J10x or Kx or even 9xxx it can be critical. I was reminded of this when I picked up the East cards at Woodcote. B24 21/2.

West opened a strong NT and before I could make the raise to game N came in with 3S. What do you do? Make up your mind before reading on.

The bidder must have a good suit. The pre – empt, would suggest seven. At least two honours. Partner must have 2/3 spades, could one be an honour? Suppose N has AQJxxxx where will he expect to find the K ? In W surely. He will not lead AS for fear of cutting off his partner completely. Decided?

 I remembered the old advice - 3NT. Imagine North’s chagrin when he lead 8S and sees the bare K. But wait Show whole hand  If the AS is lead South cannot unblock QS without establishing the 10S as a stopper. Declarer declined the H finesse and scored +430 beating 5D. Only one other pair bid the NT game.  

 

Comment
Another Grand Missed!

On-line Bridge has been good for my column. It enables me to do a lot of kibitzing for material. I have two pet hates. The slavish desire to bid 4 card majors. Often suppressing a five card minor in order to bid on 9654. A suit useless, unless Partner can bid it. When it comes to slams. Too often Partnerships stretch to NT overlooking the fact playing in a suit can give ruffs in dummy that are not there in NT. I spotted this one at the Dutch Club.

At every table South opened a weak 2S. North with his, 26 point monster could bid 7S, decided on Blackwood and located the KS. Now North could count 11 tricks two Norths bid 6NT and two more 6S. All, over looked the point that the S.65 used as ruffs would add to 13. The QD and the ruff gives the Grand.

Now play in 6NT, a probable Club or spade will do for a lead, let’s go with 2C. Dec can see that 7S is there so to make the overtrick is crucial. Show full hand.

Count the tricks 6S 2C 3D and AH adds to 12. The overtrick can come from the fourth D if they break 3-3 or the J drops. If the KH is right that will do. How to combine the chances? If neither happens and the two danger cards are in East, he can be squeezed in the reds.

Off we go. Cash AKC, then AKD – nothing drops. Now cash the Spades but first QD and discover the JD is good. On the last Spade, East who has choose between the JD and his H KX is squeezed. It will take a controlled East great will power not to give away the endgame.   

Comment
Who Needs a Finesse

I played my first F2F bridge at Woodcote on 7 Feb. I was rattled! I had to sort my cards, tidy my bidding box, show my system, keep a scorecard. My long suffering, partner Marina could see it, and was disturbed. There were 17 tables in play. The purists could carp that it was not a level playing field, since we did not all play the same boards! Never mind, well run, friendly, who wants more? See NS only

This was board 4. West deals. Game All we first see N/S only.

Three passes and South opened 1C, (silent oppos) and 1H now 2S game force, but 5 card majors played, must be four. North now the key bid 4S, passed hand, must be 4/5 in the majors at least. South now decided that to justify the bid N must have a D control and bid 6S.  After thought the 2H was lead. How do you proceed? Over to you.

There are plenty of tricks if the finesses win there are H,S,C. But in in a slam if 50% of finesses lose you are down so we look for other methods. We put in the 10H wins. We expected the unbid suit D to be lead. This suggests that he does not have KQD. Is the 2H a singleton? If it is, then surely, he has long D and would poke in a second round bid. If we now use the entry in dummy to take the trump finesse and it loses a trump will be returned and we are short of tricks.  We decide to cash AKS. All follow and the 10S drops from East. Cash AH cross to AD take KH and shed losing D. Continue H leaving QS high and dry. Chalk up 1430 +

See full hand

The slam was bid only twice from 11 Every finesse was right!  

 

Comment
No Need to Rush

One of my constant themes, in these columns is, that in response to partners action, you should avoid taking early decisions and simply try to describe the hand as succinctly as possible. When the opportunity arises to exchange information – use it. This one came up in the Andrew Robson Thursday game. Love all West deals.

Looking at all four hands (N/S silent) the double major fit makes 13 tricks routine. The board was played 22 times 9 times in a small slam and 13 others stopped in game. The first question was what to open or not on the West hand. Some thought it a 1S opener 2S was misleading with that strength Not me, no defensive tricks! A weak 2S is perfect, there were endless 2S - 4S auctions no attempt at information gathering or description. Those who bid 2NT enquiring on values were rewarded with a 3H response (max points weak suit.) I prefer the bid 3H – forcing at least a 5 suit and the double fit discovered. Now the 20 point responder could not stop. What is the rush? Ask and you will get a clear answer. I dislike the immediate jump to game.

Comment
The Sacrifice

When to sacrifice, or go one more, or combat the pre- empt is one of the great dilemmas of the game. Let us suggest a few guidelines.

1. When making a pre – empt check the vulnerability, when favourable the bidder can be more adventurous.

2. As a principle try to go to the limit as soon as you can. Once announced your partner now knows your hand and is best qualified to take any further decisions.

3. Your position at the table. First hand, there are three unknown hands to bid after you so your bid should be as clear and sound as you can make it. Third in hand opposite a passed Partner you can be looser.

4. Above all remember you have a partner do not take precipitate action in front of them if you are not sure.

This diatribe triggered by this hand from Woodcote 23/1 The full hand. East deals and N/s only are vulnerable

What happened? NS can make 5S losing only the black Aces. EW make 4H losing AD and two clubs. So who sacrifices and to what

level? As East the broken H suit makes it unattractive in defence despite the AS. I would go the whole hog and open 4H. What are your methods here? Pass Dbl or 4S. I would bid 4S (these are opinions I cannot preach doctrine) brings us to W you cannot do nothing. The KJ9H and AC are surely priceless. 5H now North. An Ace less 11 count again we cannot be definitive 5S? These decisions win matches.

The traveller shows it was played 12 times. 6 x 4H, 3x5H twice X -1 1x 4S and another made 5S! put yourself in each seat in turn it is very instructive hand.

Comment
An Easy Slam?

RAC played Roehampton on Wednesday. This board came up. Rotated to West/ East for convenience. Love all South deals and passes.

I was West playing in an occasional partnership with David Glass SAYC. I decided that, although borderline it might become impossible to bid both majors if I passed. 1S – 2H now 6 loser hand but 5H – 4H. David knows that I must be 5-5 or 6-4 in the majors but minimum for the bid. 4NT (RKCB) -5D (one key) must be AS. 5NT unbid Ks? 5D (KD). Now David can deduce that with single or doubleton KD he can see a possible Grand. It hangs on the 5th heart in West. He knows 6H is certain, the match is tight, strange partnership 6H. I tabled the perfect dummy. In the other room West did not open and they never caught up 11 IMP to RAC.    

Comment
Count Declarers’ Tricks

When defending, on sight of the dummy, ask yourself where are Dec tricks coming from? Suppose he is at the five level. He needs 11. Now try to visualise his hand and count his tricks. This was the penultimate board at Woodcote. EW only vul. Dealer South. We will see North and West, only first. You are West.

South opens 3H and you make TOX. North 4H and partner 4S. South with no hesitation 5H, you double and lead 4S  Dummy goes up with A, ruffs a s with 2H and leads a D. You win AD. Over to you? Make your decision before you flag up the answer.

Show full Hand

 

Why has Dec not drawn trumps? Construct his hand. Must be 7 H and four honours. That plus, AS adds to eight tricks You must switch to a trump they win and play a C Partner must win and play a second Trump for – 1 x

1. Count Declarers’ tricks. His tricks can come only from trumps extract them. Nobody found this defence in 20 tries.

2. Double Dummy 4S makes but only once achieved.

3. 5H* is a bad bid. The Pre-empt has announced in full the nature of the hand. The unknown hand is N. It is not S decision. Give North one less Club and the 2D, or the 10S and they are looking at 500 or more.

*Who can quarrel with success?

Comment
Why Did Nobody Play in Clubs?

Happy New Year everybody!

I tried to play in the Dutch club event on 4th Jan but was excluded by computer failure. A pity as the cards were wild. None more so than this intriguing B18. NS vul. East deals. See full hand.

So much easier when you can see all four hands! NS can with the aid of the S finesse make six clubs, two H ruffs and four spades. 12 tricks. EW playing in H lose two S, I club and possibly 1 D. 6HX -3 NS +300. Par

How might the bidding go? I would open the South hand 1C. Yes it is borderline, but it is a good suit and opposite – say a weak NT – will make game. It is also the suit you want lead.  West with both majors TOX. North can see that H will now be bid to at least the 3 level so with good C support should bid 1S. Now or never.The K is surely on his right. East should now with his 7 loser hand - 4H. South can only pass. And N goes 5C. EW at the vulnerability may go one more. And…..? Not easy!

What, actually happened?

The board was played four times. Three played in 4H-1 and another in 5H-1, nobody doubled. One player opened 3C. I do not like this, with two unlimited hands yet to speak. Another passed and this makes the slam impossible. Another opened 1C but his partner responded 2D. Not what South wanted to hear and the S fit was never discovered.

I am sympathetic to N responding to 3C opener who went to 5C immediately but took no further action with his perfect fit.

Comment
Conceal, Disguise, Obfuscate

We all complain that if we had second sight, we would find the winning play. It is important, when declarer, we endeavour to give opponents as little information as possible. Have you noticed how the Robot, follows suit or discards? He will not play them lowest first. He is trying to tell you that he does not retain the remaining winner.

Those who partner me will have noticed that I always play the spot cards in the “incorrect” way – not lowest first. To confuse the count in the suit.

We have a side suit, Q65 opposite AJ43. Players continually lead the Q to finesse. Why? If the K is under the Ace they simply cover. Now only two tricks are possible. But if the 5 is lead towards J and it wins, it might be KX, now the Ace will establish the Queen.

Let us talk discards. Declarer runs his long suit, and you must discard. Players cling to the suit they have established, they have no entry, and therefore no hope of cashing it. The effect of this is that they make revealing discards in the other suits, instead of simply “playing the cards you are known to hold”.

Look at this hand from play. West deals at Game all opens a Strong NT and is raised to Game. The QH is lead and continued. On the third round South plays the K and Dec takes his AH. The AD must be knocked out.  South wins the second round and returns a third.

Declarer reluctant to finesse to North noted that the fourth H had not been cashed and assumed ta it was in North. He felt it was safe to finesse JC but South won and cashed the concealed 7H for down one.  

 

A Very Happy Healthy New Year to all our readers from Tony and Fiona.

 

Comment
The Search for Overtricks

This hand came up on the Sunday game. We will look at the whole hand. Game All. North deals, opens 1D. EW silent.

South responded1H, so North must decide. Does he bid his good S suit, or show his 16 point hand with 1NT? On balance I think 1NT is best, not least because with H.Q8 it is better to play the hand. South raised to 3NT and the 4C was lead, to the 10 and Q.  Declarer can see 10 top tricks but first he must knock out AD. West with 10D decides to take and return a club setting up the KC. Declarer continues D and when the 10 drops he has 11 on top. Is there a 12th trick. The KC is known to be in East and if he has KH he can be squeezed.

Let us try it.

Throw 2S and 2H on the D. Cash the S and East cannot retain KC and K6 H.

One player threw H on the D killing the Squeeze, In 4S a H lead breaks up the play.

Martin Langdon bid & played the hand exactly as described. Well done.

Tony and Fiona wish all our readers a Very Happy Christmas.

Comment
Blunder of the Year, by Guess Who

I try not to write about blunders. Those involved already know, and those who were not, do not learn.

I am however allowed to write about my own.  Game All W Deals & passes

We bid 1C – 1H – and I chose to bid 3NT. All passed. Look at the South hand again. Partner is obviously short in H, the danger of a one suited hand with no side entry is that a ducking play by them with a high honour will kill the suit so S should remove to 4H. I got the lead of the 10D to the K. I have five C tricks. AD surely at least two H but that is only 8. Is there any point in ducking? Not really, another one will be played through my J and if the H finesse fails, they must have S entry to cash out. Cursing my partner for not going on (big mistake, it’s done) I won and lead JH and hoping the K would take it ducked in dummy.Nothing for it now try a S. they take for two down (not a bottom I was not the only stupid one).

The full hand came up and I could see that if I covered the JH and continued the suit, I make twelve tricks.

My partner was right all the time!

Apologies and move on.

 

Comment
A Squeeze to Make a Slam

This hand came online with many instructive points. We will see the whole hand immediately but with H suit missing.

North opened a strong NT, opponents silent, South bid 3C (good suit, game force)- 3S (natural, I am interested). South now feared that North may not have an Ace and Blackwood might commit them too high, he bid 5NT. North’s hand is only Aces and Kings and went 6C.

The AD was lead and continued hoping for a singleton. Declarer can now count 11 top tricks and a simple H finesse would make 12, or many squeeze options. Cash AC (they break) cross to KC and ruff a D to isolate the D menace in dummy. Draw two more trumps West throws one D and a spade. Cross to AKS and ruff the third. West squeezed again a H. Now South leads his last trump and a second H emerges from West and one is thrown from dummy.

Where is the QH?

There are a few clues. When someone leads an Ace against slam knowing the K is likely to be on the table, he usually has hope of another trick. The play has shown that W is 3-4-5-1 so the odds are 4-3that he has the Q. go to KH and return to AH dropping the now bare Q.

Relating this hand to a friend he said “but all he did was cash his winners”

Yes

Comment
Hand Evaluation and Overtricks

One of the many difficult questions one is asked at this game is, what is my hand worth? I watched this hand on line. Love all. East deals. Look first at the East hand. What do you open?

Everybody opened 1D and in one case bid 2D over the 1S response! What would I bid? I have first round control for all four suits. Just four losers and surely 8 certain playing tricks. An almost solid 6 card suit. In short, I want to be in game opposite some rubbish.

 I open a game force 2C. It now goes 2S (positive an ace and three Ks.) We are in the slam zone for sure. 3D (my suit must be good) 4D agreed. 4H cue 4S Ace and K – 4NT (RKCB) 5D (1or4 keys) 6C another cue anything else? 7D not arf.

Two players found 6NT only the two robots made +1. Dec has 12 on top, North has the black suits, South the H. Several squeezes are possible depending on the leads.

I have gone long enough now. You work it out.

Comment
Negative Doubles - are they used?

Over the pandemic period I have been playing on - line like so many of you. Every body has declared negative  doubles played. Believe it or not I have never had it used by any partner! The bid is used typically to show a H suit as in 1D – 1S (opponent) Dbl. this says I probably have 4+ H (not a good enough suit to go it alone) if this does not fit with you, I can tolerate your D or another suit. It is unlimited initially.

A dramatic example was B18 from ARB on 17/11 East deals and NS only are Vul.

East with his, 5 loser hand opened the obvious 1D South despite the adverse vulnerability a weak 2H. Now West bid 2S instead of the Neg X and North boldly went 4H. This goes for 500 Now East is trapped if he bids 5C and is wrong it will be one more light in 5SX. So he bid 4S. this can be made on the H lead by ruffing a H, but was not found. Over the neg X it is easy in E to bid 5C and the easy slam is found. Nobody did.

The bid is in your system to be used!

Comment
The Centenary Cup.

20 Teams contested the Centenary Cup on15 November. It was won by RAC RED 1 Howard, Colin, Terry, and Marina from RAC RED 2.

Michael Bailey with typical modesty told me about a disaster recorded with David Mannooch. Bd 19 EW vul and South deals. The results were varied! 

Names withheld for reasons that will be apparent. I will relate their actual bidding first. South opened 3S and West doubled for TO. Pass 4S- Pass – Pass – and X again. East decided this was also for TO and instead of 4NT (both minors choose) bid 5D doubled and -1100.

Michael did say, that they wasted no time on post mortems, and played on.

Where do we start? What do you bid over 3S in West? The choices are: Pass - there are two unlimited hands to follow. Unless Partner has H fit you do not want to play in the suit. Possibly 3NT? In my view the worst bid is X. Ok they had not agreed their doubles, they said, but simple logic tells East he has already told his partner he has nothing so 4SX must be blood.

Fiona our scribe and your columnist are recovering from their surgical visits and ready to return, here we are! 

We both thank all for your support.

Comment
3 NEW HANDS BELOW

Dear reader, there are 3 new hand below for your perusal and enjoyment.  Tony and scribe (Fiona) are away for the next 3 weeks seeking medical attention!

Comment
Spots and Timing

I have written recently about the importance of observing and selecting spot cards. The timing of when to take winners is, as important. This is particularly significant in defence. Have a look at this problem set 40 years ago by the double dummy maestro Bernasconi.

You are East and the bidding has gone North - 1C pass by you 1NT passed out. The 2S is lead and you see dummy. An everyday hand.

Declarer plays low from dummy. Your move? Dummy has 13 points, you 11, Dec denies a 4xcard major. Partner must have 8-10 similar to South. Now use the rule of 11. The spot 2 from 11and you are looking a 6 of them Dec must have Jxx or Axx.

How might this contract be beaten? You, think 3 S, AH and two D. But for that happen you will need P to lead diamonds TWICE. If Dec has the J. Preserving West entries is crucial. Play the 9 and loses to JS. Dec now plays KJ10 of H and you win the third round. QS forces partner’s Ace and P now remembers that with balanced hands you need two suits to provide tricks to defeat 1NT. He switches to 10D. You win the QD, return the 10S and continue 4S to the 8S. Another D establishes the setting trick. Show hand.

Try it again, but win the first trick with QS. Hence, my title Spots&Timing.  

Comment
Bullied by Partner, Respond?

My dislike of Swiss teams is well known. All too often one board decides a match. At the Hurlingham in their New Year event long ago, we were opposed by two ladies of advanced years. They bid 2NT- 4NT – 6NT – 7NT. Everything broke 3-3 all finesses worked – 2220. To finish it off our partners played in 6H and missed the safety play in trumps -100, the event was over for us!

On 29/9 I played on Marinas team. I was dealer with the West cards. I opened 1C and East – you responded with the natural 1S. 2H from south and the splinter -4H you have 10 losers 4S is enough. Now 5D from West. Both red suits were doubled by North. Your move? Decide before reading on. You have ten losers but, despite bidding minimum S only Partner will not give up. He must at least be 4-6 black or better. At worst a single H and AD. You have so far told him nothing other than 4S and rock bottom. But that is not your hand. AS and four more. Decided? The full hand was. Show All

The bid was 5S. Nobody else went beyond game and yes it decided the match. Ah well! it was enjoyable. 

Comment
Playing Strength

A suit – let us say S.AKQJxxx, should make 7 tricks in  4S but so it does in NT. That contract requires only 9 tricks for game. B1 at the Reform 13/ 9 full deal was: 

Love all, East Deals

A competitive deal with big opportunities for both sides. We can see all four, a privilege granted to nobody else. EW lose three aces and a club in a S contract. If NS get the clubs right, they lose a H & a club in 5D. Par on this board is NS + 300 in 5SX -2. But nearly all, pairs failed to see that 3NT was cold.

Dealer passes. What do you open on South? It depends on your system. The case for a game force 2C is there but if it goes 2C-2D -3D you have used lots of space. One pair did just that and (with no intervention) went 3NT passed out for a good score. Most players opened 1D and this lead to spades bid and supported to at least 3S. (One intrepid North who would have fitted in well at Balaclava went 2H.) Now what over 3S? South now knows 3NT makes and that 4D + 130 is poor compensation. South must go 5D, if they double, with careful play it makes. If they go one more doubled it loses +300 but at least that is Par. The top on the actual board was 5DX + 750.

Comment
Defensive Signals

Long ago I played a Gold Cup match against Nico Gardner and Albert Rose, fresh from the Euros. They remarked that the Blue Team “not so good this time” but went on to say that their defence was sensational “every card means something”.

B 17 from the Reform 18/10 reminded me of this. We were E/W at Love All and we will see the whole deal.

Most Norths opened a weak 2D. I chose to Dbl and S 3C. P devalued the red Queens and competed with 3S raised to game by me. South took the QC lead and, continued with four rounds conceding the ruff and discard, We, chalked up +420 but this was only an average. Others gained +500 when NS went on to the 5 level. So how should the defence to 4S go?

North leads JD ruffed with 6S (not the 4 we need to show we have another). AC gets the Q and continues with J. (a Mc Kenney for another D) Ruffed with JS. (No more) and another D ruff with 4S Now KC and 9D thrown (McKenney for a H). Now a H switch and the defence makes two D ruffs, two clubs and a ruff and one H. 4S -3, this defence was never found.  

Comment
Can We Punish the Greedy Double?

When you double an opponent, you should be aware that you are giving him information that will assist his play. Since a penalty of any kind will surely result in a bad score serious risk must be taken to land the contract. B13 at the Dutch C 28/9. Love All North deals.

North passes and the bidding continues,1H- P 3H- 3S (4C showing the shape is better) 4D- 4NT – 5D (one key) -5H and South after some thought doubles. Take the East cards.  With ruffs there are plenty of tricks so let us count losers. The doubler surely has  AJ9(4).The JC is lead and smells single, Spades are unbid so possibly 4-4 There is our working blueprint. Two sure H losers and one D. Entries are going to be crucial, if your hypothesis is right the QD will not drop. Try JD covered and won. 3H North sheds 2C to KH. The AH and a S switch. The hand is now known. 9D no point covering and small H to dummy, if J H is not taken. East has control. The doubler will learn a lesson.    

Comment
Playing Strength. Again!

Good news to see us playing back at Pall Mall. Not me yet, but hospital awaits me at the end of October. In fact dear reader Fiona who looks after our Bridge Web site is also going into hospital so you may have to bear with us for one week on our updates!

One thing has not changed unfortunately and that is Slam bidding – banging on again!

One of many things I have stressed is Playing Strength. A long suit headed by AK will make tricks in its own strain but also in NT. B21 on 30/9 depressed me. The result sheet was universal all pairs 4H+3. Averages all.

North deals and passes and you hold the East cards. Show East only. What do you open?

Systems are important. It is an ideal old Acol 8 playing tricks (or Benji 2C) -2H the auction might then go, 2H- 3D- 3H- 4C- 4NT - 5D- 6H with H breaking 2-2 all 13 tricks roll in. Playing an all - purpose 2C, I would bid that. The auction would proceed along similar lines to above. I think most people opened 4H this I think is a gross underbid. Partner is unlimited, while you want to play in H it is not essential, a pre-empt should show little defence and say – useless unless in the suit nominated. Finally, the hand has 8 H and three first round controls. Time to see partner’s hand.  Show West. What would you bid over 4H?

Comment
Spots!

During the pandemic I have mentored Jeremy Wright. We called a halt in July because I felt it was time for him to develop a partnership and learn together. We have partnered since. several times.

A frustration for me was his inattention to the messages that the small cards conveyed and I instituted a system of 1P fines for lapses. He still owes me 12P!

I found, an advanced example of what I mean in a 2004 American magazine. Let us see how you get on? N deals Love all.

The bidding goes after two passes, 1C (5 card M) - 1D – 2NT –3NT. West leads 3H (4th best) and you see dummy, to the 9 J and 8. You continue with KH to 10, 5, & 5S. Your move? Your immediate instinct is the 7H. Hang on a minute – where is the 2H? If P began with A6532 why did it not appear when the JH was played? If you cash the7H and continue, Dec plays 2H on the last H he drops 10D. Show all. Now you see what Decs problem was. He needs you to play the 4th round to unblock D. Just switch to 10S and the contract fails.

 

Comment
Stuff Happens – GW Bush

At Reform 20/9 I played with Kiki Greenwood. We got average results and I, endeavouring to gain points made a few mistakes. We had dragged ourselves into the top half, the last arrived. B18 East deals NS vul.

I was South and had just picked up my hand, East bid 2H and my computer cut me off ! “Too many online”.

I did not come back until the end of my partner playing 3NT, making 12tricks. A grand slam there and her partner vanishes! Mortal enemies deserve better. In the chaos BBO did not record the result or the bidding, but      Reform at least got the traveller. It looks like everybody got the weak 2H. People played in NT and two made 13. The bidding probably went 2H - 2S – 3NT a gross underbid. On the KH lead Dec has AH AKQS AKQ D and hopefully four clubs and with 9D in dummy four certain D. The 2H warns you to expect bad breaks so careful testing of the suits and entry preservation are a must. Win AH and try S. When JS appears, we have 11 tricks. The majors are 6-6 so no one hand cand hold both minors. But which way round? The most flexible suit is clubs so KQ C and when West singleton shows, is squeezed in S&D  for 13 tricks.

How should it be bid? Old fashioned Acol  (2H) 2S -3H (game force) – 3NT- 4D -5C-  6NT. The computer break is the last thing you want with a hand like this.

As GWB said “stuff happens”

Comment
Playing Strength

A suit – let us say S.AKQJxxx, should make 7 tricks in 4S but so it does in NT. That contract requires only 9 tricks for game. B2 at the Reform 13/ 9 full deal was:

Love All. East Deals

A competitive deal with big opportunities for both sides. We can see all four, a privilege granted to nobody else. EW lose three aces and a club in a S contract. If NS get the clubs right, they lose a H & a club in 5D. Par on this board is NS + 300 in 5SX -2. But nearly all, pairs failed to see that 3NT was cold.

Dealer passes. What do you open on South? It depends on your system. The case for a game force 2C is there but if it goes 2C-2D -3D you have used lots of space. One pair did just that and (with no intervention) went 3NT passed out for a good score. Most players opened 1D and this lead to spades bid and supported to at least 3S. (One intrepid North who would have fitted in well at Balaclava went 2H.) Now what over 3S? South now knows 3NT makes and that 4D + 130 is poor compensation. South must go 5D, if they double, with careful play it makes. If they go one more doubled it loses +300 but at least that is Par. The top on the actual board was 5DX + 750.

Comment
Mamma Mia – Here we go again.

Has the reunion gone well? Not for me, as a devoted fan I want them to be timeless. They are not. B9 on 5 Sept reminded of them. It threw up these EW hands. Both red suits break. EW vul. North deals, three passes to West.

When you pick up your cards, you count your 22 points. You have two good suits but most importantly huge playing strength if you can find a fit in either red suit. What might you need opposite? S. QJ and xxxx in either red, should be good for a small slam. Add in the AS and the same red xxxx and it’s a Grand. The forcing to game 2C is not at its best with two suiters, but everybody opened it with that bid,

I will list below (silent oppos) the various auctions with minimal comment.

  1. 2C – 2NT – 3H - 3NT -4D – 5D (AS never shown)
  2.  2C -2S – 2NT -3NT (suits never bid)
  3.  2C - 2D – 2H – 2S- 3D- 3NT (positive denies, never catches up)
  4.  2C – 2S – 2NT – 3NT (suits not mentioned, playing strength unrealised).
  5. 2C- 2D- 2H - 3C - 3D- 3S- 3NT (after a positive how can you stop?
  6.  Finally. 2C – 2D -- 2H -2S- 3D – 4D (a fit at last) 6D (rushing why? Why not 2S positive? Why not 6C over 5D?  must be G Slam try East can now see that his fourth D and single H are added values, -7D.

Well at least they bid A Slam!

What do I think? All these points are mentioned in recent articles.

2C – 2S (positive probably A&K. Bid the control first) 3H (good suit want to play there)- 3NT no fit I do not. Now 4D second suit 5D (like that) – 6C grand slam try, must be void, 7D.

Comment
The Two Suited Overcall

A long time ago we started using two suited overcalls. First was the Unusual NT to show both minors. Then came Ghestem & Michaels to show the off suits. I have written and used the bids sparingly. The primary reason being that if your side does not secure the contract, you have presented declarer with a blueprint for the play.

B17 on 26/8, RAC pairs, Love all North deals, take the N/S Cards. The bidding went: 1D – 2D (Majors) - 3D (bold) – 4S. North could not resist 5D. With E/W shape announced their game should be close.

The AS was lead and continued. North was certain to lose to the two major aces so the club finesse must be right. Ruff the spade, and East follows to AD run JC. When this wins, back to KD, and surprise, the 10D drops. East must be 5-5 - 2 and a single club. Just as well not to rush a second finesse. Now surely there is H.AJxxx on the left. KH to the A and a third S ruffed. QH and the JH drops on the right!! The 10H, H ruff and the last H ruffed and the second club finesse. Now we see the whole hand.

 Show all 5Dx made +550. 4S X goes for 800. What on earth was the 2D bid about, what is wrong with a TOX? Blueprint what blueprint? More salt in the wounds? Just cover the JC now a club is lost. Would JC have been lead at trick 4 without the Michaels? The two-suit overcall should only be used when you are either weak and looking early for a sacrifice or strong searching for a fit.

Comment
Fit & Shape

Five and six card broken suits are useless unless Partner can support them. K9543 is great opposite AQ or J862  I was dealt S.K9543 H.Void D.3 C.KQ10952 the other day. Game All Dealer. I was the only person who passed. Partner had 5-6 Red and in the missfit everybody got too high. Shape is only valuable, as playing tricks with a fit. A dramatic example occurred at the Reform 23/8 B 17 Love all North deals. We will give you the East hand, (my seat) only first.

North passed and various players bid on my rubbish not me. South 1D. Partner 1S and North 2D, Your move? Looks like they have the points, but you have the fit and the shape. Many players simply bid 4S but there is a much more informative (rare) bid available - 4D. This is a splinter (D shortage good S support) and it continued Dbl – 4S – P – P and South chose to Dbl. Time to see the hand.

As can now be seen 5S is cold. 5D with proper play     is -1.  The KH is Dummy is priceless and South just makes two Aces

Comment
Anybody Listening?

For some weeks I have used HOW and a lead essay to highlight the Circle’s weakness in slam bidding. They are still there. Evidence that nobody had read them, or listened, was proven by B13 on 12 August. Game all North deals. We will look at the E-W hands only.For some weeks I have used HOW and a lead essay to highlight the Circle’s weakness in slam bidding. They are still there. Evidence that nobody had read them, or listened, was proven by B13 on 12 August. Game all North deals. We will look at the E-W hands only.

The board was played six times. Look first at the auctions for the two pairs who scored 90%. After three passes West with seven key cards opened 2D (Benji, game force) – 2H relay, denies positive. 4NT (do not jump) meant as quantitative – Why? Taken as RKCB – 5C (0-3) 5NT (asks for unbid Ks) – 6C (no) 6NT. Surely the worst auction of all +1470. But competition is fierce.

R2. 2D – 2H – 4NT - 5C- 6NT (effectively opens 6NT)

R3 2C – 3D (suit and positive) again 4NT – 5C (strange? D must be good) 6D +1 +1390 and 60 %.  

R4 2C – 2D –3NT (25/6 balanced) - pass (imagination. playing strength, how bad am I?)

R5 Even worse 2NT – 3NT (describe your hand)

R6 2C -2D – 2NT (Passes a game force)

Comment
Why do we not bid more slams?

For some time now I have been writing about the circle’s record with Slam hands. It’s awful. May I suggest some reasons?

1. Poor hand valuation. What is your hand worth?

2. Imagination. What might your hand be worth opposite the right fitting cards.?

3. Failure to fully inform P of your hand. How can your partner revalue his hand if you do not ask, or prompt him, that he should?

Take an everyday sequence West opens 1H (four card M), North 1S and playing negative Dbl– 2H from P. South -2S. We will look at the West hand only at first.

You to bid over 2S? You have just 14 points, a broken 6 card suit, but three first round, one second round control. Just one player bid 3D, everyone else simply 4H. Two opponents went 4S with good results, time to see the whole hand. You can now see that East is max for his 2H and has the priceless double red fit. Moreover his three S means he has the vital club shortage. Twelve tricks are cold. No pair bid the slam. One West bid, 3D but his partner only raised to 4H.

  1. What is my hand worth if P is max for his/her bid? This applies to both players.
  2. Tell my P what I have got. Then they can – if they want – revalue.
  3. Having agreed H the bidding should continue 3D – 4D (still forcing, second fit, max) Now West is worth 5C and this solves East worries 6H.
Comment
Discovery

When Declarer we see 50% of the cards. What we would all like to know is what is in the opponents’ hands and particularly, where are the high cards? The technique is known as discovery play.

This was B15 at the Dutch Club 3 August. S deals at Love all and passes. We will see all four hands.

South passed and West opened a weak NT. East decided to try for 4-4H with Stayman*, this allowed South to mention 2S. The final contract 3NT on the 4S lead, ducked, and the suit continued to the A and N unblocked KS. The hand is hopeless unless the D suit runs. We have 5D, AKC and AS. We need to find the QC. Cash the D, which divide, N drops JD. On the next two D. North has a problem. He probably throws 6H and 2C. If he throws two C he must have 5 and its easy. Now you consider the clubs in isolation. The point here is that whoever wins Q will enable them to cash 4S and AH for one down, but if North has it then an overtrick with 4 Club tricks is possible. This tips you over to playing N for QC.

Running the long suit is very old tactic and often gives you the chance to discover where the cards lie.

*Reese never used Stayman believing that it gave away information. As here with an ace less hand and no shape a simple 3NT is best.

Comment
The Fog of War

On National Service we had an instructor who repeatedly told us “The fog of war is very real thing”.

Nowhere is this more evident than at the table. This was the last board at the Dutch Club 27 July. See the whole hand from the beginning to make things more intelligible! N/S only Vul. East Deals. I was North.

East passed. What do you open as S? You have 8 solid tricks but four first round controls. If partner can help in either red suit (slams) or stop S (NT). If you open 1C what is your rebid? My Mentee 1C – 1S (no pre- empt) to me. My bid should be a Neg X to show H and not good enough for 2H. Not sure this would be understood risked the 2H. Should be at least 5 & 8+ points. East – 2S – 3C – 4S. to me. Partner is minimum but a good six clubs no H support*. West has a good overcall and hopes to make 4S. We are vulnerable so its game over for me- Pass. But not for my P - 5C (Niagara Falls in a barrel I thought*) but help is at hand. 5S by W. I doubled this. Got to shut P up somehow if we have pushed them to a make, it will stink anyway. This cost 1100 and all the MPs. What happened else where? Two pairs played not in game in Clubs the third used the Neg X but stopped in 5 for +480. 

I boils down to hand valuation if South opens the game force 2C it is simpler to bid.

*6C and 6H are cold do I know anything?

Comment
A Grand Slam on the First at the Reform.

We all hope for a flat board to start. Imagine my feelings on B1. East I heard North Pass as dealer at Love All. My partner was Marina (Benjamin  5 Majors) We will look at the West/East hands only – opponents silent.

Readers can see that thirteen tricks are available in NT, H or D. Let us look at the results: 3x 6H +1, 1x 3NT + 4, 1x 4H +3   1x 5D +2 (for the bottom – no names – bribes welcome) and one more. Some time ago I wrote a series of articles about responding to big hands. My base point was that once you know partner is big (game force) you are by, definition weak. The sequences show nobody was listening. The main fault was rushing. One East opened 1H! Another when you have identified your D fit how do you stop in game?

What about the missing pair?

East opened a Benji 2D (Acol 2C. ) how do you respond?. This hand is huge so a positive is in order. My P was reluctant to bid 2S believing this would show 5 in the suit (not my view) and bid 3D, not a suit you want to play in. It did have the priceless advantage for me of showing a positive response and at least AS and Qxxxx D. now I know we have at least 10 red winners plus two black aces. We must look for the grand in at least one red suit. I bid 3H – set the suit, drew the response 3S confirming the hand. What next – on reflection I think 4C is the bid. But I chose 4NT (RKCB) and now P - 6H. Why not the book response 5D (1-4)? Convinced that I had missed something I contented us with 7D. this was not optimal. But took the pot.

 George Bernard Shaw responding on a first night to cries of “Author”   was greeted by a lone “Boo” from the Gallery. “I quite agree but who” he said “are you and I among so many?”.

Comment
Does Anybody Play for Money?

I learnt to play bridge at home in the Friday night game with Mum, Dad and the neighbours. Stakes were one penny a 100. On a bad night you could lose 60pence, which I did not have. In the USA on commute, I discovered the bridge car, stakes a nickel or a quarter $. Played as a permanent Goulash! In an hour to Manhattan, you could lose 30/40 $. I did not have that either. You learn quickly.

I was reminded when this hand came up on 1 July. N/S only Vul, and North deals. North opens 1C (could be short) you overcall 1D, South a Neg X. West passes, North bids H1, passed to East who bids 1S and S 3NT. Now West comes to life with 4S – 5C N to you? Decide before we look at the whole hand? Count the points North must have 11+ and a string of clubs, South 13/14, these plus 11 your do not leave much for partner? So why has he bid? He must think 4S is a cheap sacrifice at the score. Have you bid your hand? It must be 4-6 weak. Choices are, 5S Pass (I have bid my hand) Dbl. At the table, the last option was chosen.  

The JD was lead won by the K.  He had to decide if the JD was single. He continued with a low D to the Q and the S loser vanished as he cashed the rest. NS +950.

Take close look, 3NT goes -2 because the Spades block! Most other pairs got the JD lead. Ducked for overtricks. 5S makes or at worst -1X. But can you think of a worse hand to Dbl with than East? There is a way to discover whether JD is single. Lead KS if partner drops the 2 (stop) or the 6 (continue) now you know; but the overtrick matters not.

 Unless you are playing for money.

Comment
The Desperation Duck

You are playing in NT. Dummy has AK7654 opposite your 82 but no other entry. If you wish to establish the suit you would routinely duck the first round and hope for a 3-2 break for five tricks. But suppose the suit is headed by AQ now if the finesse wins the position is the same. The Desperation Duck. This was B15 on the 27th June. South deals at N/S vul. 

You pass as opener and Partner playing weak NT opens 1S. You want  to bid 2C, but not good enough, fall back on the catch all 1NT. All pass and 4H is lead. You are playing the hand,in the strain you did not want. We have all been there! It is pairs so the overtricks are important. There is no point in ducking the lead. Looks like they are 4-3 and if you do, they could switch to the damaging D. You could take the club finesse and if it wins take two spade finesses. But if either fails the roof comes in. You decide to try the Desperation Duck. Run the 8C to the J they take their H tricks and switch to a D. Another Cub finesse, cash out and you have the S finesse for nine, Bid up partner.

One to remember when you are up against it.

Comment
The Third Pipe. Part 3

Holmes was asked can 6H be mad? We have seen it made once with friendly defence. 7NT is there on the Triple and so is 6C. Three declarers went down on a D lead, so take the West hand and plan the play. We will again look at the full hand.

Win the AD and observe that if the trumps are no worse than 4-1 we can surely establish Spades for the loss of the KS and we have tricks to burn. When we cash AH, South discards a D.*

What is plan B? We are faced with a trump loss, therefore we must assume that the spade finesse works. North looks like at least 10 red cards so the clubs, may not break. We must find a way to encourage North to use his fifth trump while we have control. It is counter intuitive, but we play on clubs. Cash AKC and lead one more, ruffing with 7 as South shows J953. But North does not take the bait and discards 2D. 10H to QH and continue clubs throwing D if the withholding continues start on the S. and eventually draw trumps and claim.

*”No plan survives contact with enemy” Von Moltke

Comment
The Second Pipe. Part 2

We have 6H made, with poor defence. Let us continue our investigation. Refer back, if you wish, to the complete hand last week. All except one pair played in H and the last in S. Curiously nobody tried NT. Assume the bidding went 2S - (old Acol)  - 3C (positive, good suit, probably an Ace and a King or better) 3H – 4H- 4NT – 5D (one key) – 6NT. The 8D is lead to the 10D and Ace. Declarer counts his tricks 4H, 3C and one D. Even if the clubs break the spade finesse is needed. 10H to Q (maximum flex) noting the 5-0 break. JS is run and wins. Count again, 4H, 3S (at least) 1D, 3C. if either black suit behaves its easy, but North looks to have about 10 red cards. They are not. A squeeze looks the only hope. When planning this play the key is to retain communications. You do not know which suit will be unguarded. As we cash the H South starts to eject winning D. Dec now notices his 9D. With the lead in dummy this is the position. The QH forces the last D out of South. Now cash 9D and South must unguard a black suit.

End position is as above.

All 13 tricks a Triple Squeeze! “Brilliant Holmes” said Watson, “but can 6H be made against the break?” A third Pipe will be needed.

 

Part 3 to follow next week.....

Comment
A Three Pipe Problem. 3 part Series - Part 1

Sherlock Holmes when faced with puzzling crime, would retire to his armchair and think, smoking three pipes of tobacco before deciding his action. As a life long non smoker (parents died relatively young) I am unable to appreciate its efficacy. Royal Ascot did not let me join on 17 June but B4 caught my eye, and it will take more than one column to describe. We will see the whole hand. West deals at Game all.

Pascal and Michael Pater secured the top by bidding and making 6H. They bid sensibly 2S (old Acol strong 2) – 3C- 3H – 4H – 4NT – 5D – 6H. The 5S was lead,to the JS. KS, and AS. Declarer Discovered the bad news but cashed four trumps. North ruffed the spade continuation, returned a D but declarer had tricks to burn, and claimed. +1430. 

This is poor defence. Why lead your singleton with five trumps? You are much better off letting Dec find the elephant trap. South if he listens to the bidding, can see that covering the JS is a ‘no win’ play and the 5S a singleton.

Dear reader please see part 2 directly below.

Comment
Controlling the lead Loser on Loser

When you are Declarer, it is easy to overlook the Loser on Loser, play. It has many uses. One of them is blocking the danger hand from gaining the lead. Take the South cards. You get the lead of 7C after you have bid, 1H-2NT-3H- 4H.

The 7C goes to the Ace and the jack is returned. You have 6 H, 2D, and one club. The 10thtrick has got to be the 4TH D or the KS. Your move? Show All

Draw trumps, Cash AKD. And exit with 9C throwing a D. East is powerless. He has to open the S or give ruff anddiscard.

Comment
Playing Strength

One of my themes lately has been recognition of how your hand will play as Declarer. John Craggs drew my attention to B12 from last Sunday, He was South playing with his son “up north”. He held, vul, third in hand, and heard his partner deal and open a weak NT.

At rubber bridge a simple 3NT might be the bid and this was the popular choice. John foresaw that with only 14 points both his short suits could be wide open. Look again at his hand played in a D contract the has 8 winners. He decided to explore with Stayman – 2C and got the answer - 2D. No more than 6 major suit cards. Now the apparent danger is clear. He went to 5D.

 Show all immediately and a greedy X by East completed the auction. Opponents played two rounds of H, ruffed, crossed to AS and two finesses in trumps brought the game home +1. Note how the intermediates in D strengthen the playing power. Only one pair got to the 50% slam but went down!

Comment
Six Easier than Four?

I dislike playing on a Sunday, not for religious reasons but simply because I feel a non - rushed lunch is part of life’s pleasures. This enables me to kibitz my friends. 30 May gave an opportunity for smug.

Six Pairs entered and Deep Finesse – who knows everything, tells us that there were slams on six of them. So, 36 opportunities 5 were bid, four times on one hand one on another and one more which went down. We will look at the last B18 East deals. N/S vul.

West arrives in 6S and gets JC lead. At first look he has 5 trumps (possible KS loser) AH and ruff two D and 3 Clubs. It is pairs so it would be good to make 13. The circle’s poor record in slams tells him that simply bidding and making 6S will guarantee a 90% score. Consider safety, the JC suggests four in the suit. Could it be 5? In which case a losing trump could open the door for an opposing ruff, Eyes on the prize, win QC, AH ruff a H. AS and another. Show All    

Yes, a losing finesse leads to -1. This defence was found at the one table in 6S. When game was bid at all others a H was lead and 12 tricks rolled in.

Is four easier than six??

Comment
Another Twist on KQ10

We examined this combination a couple of weeks ago. I said at the time “this holding crops up often – the obligatory finesse” so the bridge gods soon dealt us this hand. West deals at love all.

After two passes East opens a natural 1C – 1H- Dbl (neg shows S)      - 4H passed to West who goes 5C. The 5H is lead N takes AH and continues, ruffed in dummy. You lead 7 club to the Ace (flexibility) – both follow – a S to 4, K and 8. 8C back to KC and another S but this time up comes the Ace and a switch to 5D. Your move!

Why has the AS been played? We have been through this, a duck opens, the way for a guess QS or finesse. If he has lead from KD then low to the Q makes the hand. Decide before seeing all four. The reason the ace has been played must be because S knows whatever you do is right. He has JS. Show all

 Up with AD back to QC and finesse 10S for D discard.

But there is yet one more twist in this tale. At this level the opening lead is usually crucial. Lead KH Partner can overtake if he likes but when he ducks the D switch jumps out.

Comment
Imagination: The System Breaks Down

 We all agree a bidding system before we sit down. These are designed to cope with most hands we get dealt. But at this game, as we have seen many times, there are no absolutes. Does anybody know a system that covers 9 card suits? Nine Souths were dealt these cards as dealer, N/S only, vulnerable 17 May at the Reform. The results and the action varied!

Join those in the hot seat, South of course your bid? I have written many times about pre-empts. As dealer, vulnerable, you have no info about any hand other than your own. Whose hand are you pre-empting? There are three candidates one of whom is your partner. You think you have just 3 losers but only 12 points. Surely the opponents have big red suits. At the table 3 Souths bid 1C, my concern with this, particularly if this could be short, is that North could be at the 4/5 level immediately with no knowledge of your hand. Another said 2C. While this at least says “big hand” it has the same weakness. Another pair opened 4NT (specific Aces). West overcalled 5D North 5S – 6C – 6H and North doubled passed out E/W – 1400 worse than 6C (1390). Show all. Time to see all. The four last pairs all opened 5C. Cannot be a pre-empt three got to the slam one the grand. 7DX costs just 300. Finally the last North remained completely silent and opponents stayed in 5S undoubled -3.

Cheap

Comment
Michaels and the Unusual NT

The other day I held vul, S. KJ765, H…, D.Q9765, C.432 on my right dealer opened 1H. I passed and was asked by my Partner later why I had not used Michaels? I answered, “I was not sure I wanted to play the hand”. Michaels of course would have been 2H showing S.&D. But you do not use a convention just because it is there. What is your motivation?  If they reach 3NT you have given them a blueprint for the play. Are you looking for a cheap sacrifice over 4H? How likely is that? Strengthen the suits: S. KQ1098, D. QJ1098 lengthen the suits, add a 2 on each Ah! that changes things.

So there we have it. Are you trying to find a sacrifice or a fit? In both cases reasonable playing strength is a necessity. Do not bid on nothing. I opened 1C at love all at the Dutch Club and opponent overcalled 2C on S.Q108632, H.QJ852 I had shape and length and got to 4C, doubled by his partner who could not resist on AKD and AC. It sailed home on a Spade lead.

On Thursday in the RAC game opponent held S. A, H.3, D.J109543, CKQ1084. His Opponents bid 1S – Pass- 2H and he intervened with 2NT. They bid on 3H – 4NT – 5H (two keys) 6H. The trump suit was H.KJ10xx opposite A873 it was obvious where the missing Q was located. Three pairs only. bid the slam and three went down.

To sum up:

1.  If you use either convention. Ask yourself what is your objective?

2.  If you are weak, be careful particularly when vulnerable. How will your hand play?

 

Comment
The Obligatory Finesse. Second time

We have all seen this holding before: xxx opposite KQ10.We need two tricks. We lead to the K, Small cards appear as we win. the K. Now back to hand another X towards dummy.

Now had the Ace been played on our right first round, we would have no choice but to finesse the 10. “The Obligatory Finesse” but now if the Ace is on left then it is Q and if it is on the right, it is 10. The Ace should usually be ducked by the defence.

Howard organised an enjoyable match with his “home” town of Bangalore. Outplayed, we did gain 13 imps on this hand. Take West as declarer & dealer at Love All.

You open 2S and North comes in with 3C. Partner goes to 4S and goes one more to 5S over South 5C. The KC is lead and you see Dummy. You have 6S, two club ruffs, AD and for contract you need two hearts. You will need entries to your hand for the two club ruffs, two more for the heart leads and trumps must be drawn. Note the sequential spots in trumps. So carefully ruff the club with 8S preserving the 3. Now 9S to the Q, A heart to the K is ducked as North plays 4H and South the 2H. KS to the AS (trumps drawn) and another club ruff. Now the vital 3S takes you back to hand for another H and the 9 appears. Your move? Consider before reading on and looking at the full hand.

North has denied the AC and if he has KQJD they might have been lead. The match so far has shown that both players are more than good enough to duck. Two more thoughts, if South has AJH bare then he cannot duck. If North does not have AH his bid becomes borderline. Decided?

 See all four.   

Why did we gain? In the other room he ruffed the KC with the 3S and found himself am entry short for the H play, Remember the position.

Comment
Enough Egg for Everybody

I joined a scratch team for the Wednesday Swiss 27April. The event was won by Paul & Sally with Pascale & John Craggs, well done.        I finished third in Lester’s squad.

The most talked about hand post mortem, was this one.

Have any among my readers noticed that a couple of weeks ago I stopped writing about “the flexible 2C”, there are four articles covering, what it means, and subsequent sequences in response. Read again, check with your Partner and make sure you are clear on your system. In a previous hand I had pointed out that when one hand declares he is big, his expectation of Partner is low. However bad the hand, you must try and tell Partner the news, he could be waiting to explore a Grand Slam.

The first decision is your opening bid? Paul researched the bidding for me.

2 x 2NT, 3 x 1S, 1 x 2D (Benjamin 2C), 4 x 2C. One South despite the Vulnerability opened his J8xxxx with QJJ on the side - 2D. He would have fitted in seamlessly at Balaclava. So much therefore depends on what your system is. We were playing Benjamin I decided that 2NTwas a bad choice as I would want to play in Spades. For me the choice lay between 2C (Benjamin 8 playing tricks) or 2D (Acol 2C). I settled on 2C - Benjamin to get the message across early that I am one suited and it is spades. The black suits both break and both make grand slams, as does 7NT. The hand results make grim reading. Six pairs in 4S, one 3NT, and five pairs in NT or spade part scores. It is obvious that none of the Easts had sufficient imagination or were given the relevant information to realise that their black suit holdings were gold.

Plenty of egg on face to go round for everybody. But if you want to look, and feel, supremely stupid try playing in 2S - (2C – 2D – 2S) and solemnly cashing 13 tricks.

How should it be bid? One misunderstanding today is the 2D bid over 2C. It is not a “relay” it is simply denies a positive.

I think 2C (whatever) - 2D - 2S – 2NT (double neg, I have nothing) now West must signal his hand, in spite of everything is, very big – 3C. Now over to East - 4S. I have twice said I am bad, but subsequent bidding tells me my dross, is not, iron pyrites. Six Spades

   

 

Comment
The Game is Hard Work

One of the things I stress when coaching is that just like any other game there is no escape from the hard yards. This struck me when kibitzing B3 on Sunday 25 April. We will see the whole hand from the off, it will be easier to follow.

You are South, deal, pass. E/W are vul. Playing strong NT, short club, the bidding goes 1C - 1S – 1NT (12-14) – 3NT and 1the 3S is lead. Declarer plays low and to your surprise your 10 wins. Do the work on the rule of 11and you know that North has S.KQxx. Now count the missing points. West must hold H.AK, D.A, and the KC. Look at dummy and you see that if a D is ducked there are four tricks for him in the suit. Four D and three H are there,  and if we return a S they have two more.

The only hope is Clubs but if we switch to the 6C we give two tricks. Partner has to, have the10C. We must “smother” the JC and lead the QC. When one of us wins the D we take 3 Clubs one S and one D.

Declarer’s error?  He has to win the AS immediately and start D. This defence was not found by any pair.

 

Comment
The Rule of Eleven

One of the oldest and most helpful defensive guides is the rule of 11. Somebody asked me the other day “I thought it only valid in NT”. No, it is valid all the time. We are taught early to lead our fourth best from say – Q742. Why? There are 13 cards in a suit but the Ace is the best card, so the “pips” are 14. Of course the 4 may not be a true (fourth) card. But the rule may help you to work it out.

As declarer the 4H is lead and you see J92 in dummy and K10 in hand. Take four, that from 11 leaves 7. You see K10J9 the hand on your right has three cards higher than the 4H.

Let us take an example hand. Take the East cards only at first. They bid 1NT from S (15-17) and is raised to 3NT.

Partner  leads 4H the J from dummy what card do you play ?

At the table East covered the J and Declarer won the KH. He takes the D finesse See full hand it loses and now you realise that you gave the contract at trick one. Do the rule of 11 and work out your mistake.

Comment
The Gods Laughed

My Reader(s) may have noticed that for the last three weeks I have been writing about the “All Purpose 2C bid”. Among the “pearls of wisdom” dispensed was “beware of two suiters”. It was inevitable that the day before that publication I sat West in the Thursday game and picked up:

Yes really! Just 17points – but only 2 losers. I decided that I need to show H and bid and repeat S to describe this extraordinary hand. So decided to bid 2C (S passes) to make sure I could make only forcing bids and quickly. 2C - 2D (negative or relay) 2H (big suit) 3C (2NT would be a clear negative) 3S (two suiter) 3NT (do not like your suits) - 4S. Must be 5 -6 or better.

Now Show All look at East and decide. The key point here is that 4S guarantees 5H but needs your opinion. You have shown your P nothing and he still will not stop. You have the priceless KH - 6H

Partner had and an attack of the heavy finger and passed! We are still speaking.

And the Gods laughed.

Comment
More on Big Hands

I have written recently on big hands. In particular, on the all - purpose 2C. I made a number of points, beware the D suit, as the response 2D takes you too high before you have described the nature of your hand. Beware of 2 suiters for the same reason. At the Dutch Club last Tuesday take the North seat alone at first. You deal at Game All.

What to open as North? We have 20 points 5 losers but 4 Aces and just one K. We have two suits but both need a fit from P. If we open 2C we may find ourselves too high and lose the S Suit. What about a simple 2NT? Which almost all chose. One pair bid 1D – P- 1S – 2H – 3H (big support in S, game guaranteed) – 3S ( bits and pieces) and a bit better than minimum (4S would be signoff ) Show all

North went to 6S, the 6C was lead and Jeremy Wright made no mistake. KC wins and 2S to the 9S which won and back to the QD and another trump losing just one trick. If 2NT had been opened and a Stayman sequence used North would be declarer and now the killing H lead would be found. No other pair bid the slam.

Comment
Overchoice

 

When I worked in the USA in the late 60’s for the first time I encountered the problem of over choice. There are just too many ways to communicate with your consumers and which one do you choose? This is a common dilemma at the bridge table. This was B4 from 8th April . Take the West seat as dealer at Game all.

 

They bid: 2C (game force) 3D (positive at least AK)- 3S – 4H = 4NT - (RKCB no suit agreed) 5H (unclear meant as 2 keys) 5NT (taken as anything else?) 6D yes KD – 7NT*. The 5C was lead and you are on play.

Count your tricks. 3S 3H 2D 3C adds to 11. If S are 3-3 that’s it, or finesse 10S (who wants to take a first round hook nothing known.) H break that’s 12. If we could get to that then minor suit squeezes come into the picture. Let us find that out.

All follow to the KQ H. South playing 9 10. This suggests they break, so the squeezes come in to consideration.

Time to see all the hand (Show all) if the opponents discard optimally however you play it cannot be made.

 

Yes the S finesse now takes the pot! Ah well!

*Not enamoured of this bidding.

Comment
The All Purpose 2C Force

A majority of us today prefer to keep the opportunity for three weak twos open and reserve 2C as the All Purpose game force. Nevertheless, there appears to be little agreement on:

1.  The types of hands opened.

2.Whether it is unequivocally forcing to game.

3. The responses.

Take my East hand, which was the first board last week.  Love all D North

Dealer passed and I had to decide on my opening. I have a 5 Loser hand. It looks like 6 H tricks but two first, and two, second round controls. It is in fact an ideal old fashioned Acol 8 playing tricks 2H. The clincher for me is that if I bid 1H and get the response 1S how do I express my hand? I could not see myself bidding less than 4H so I decided on the 2C. Now all too often people play an automatic 2D, asking P to clarify their hand and using up valuable space. (I also avoid 2C use with a two suiter, for the same reason) My view is that a 2D bid should at least deny a positive response. I opened 2C – the only East not to open 1H, Partner now responded 3S! A jump bid in a forcing situation must mean solid suit. I show my   suit – 4H. 4S nothing new but confirms his suit. Could there be a Grand there? 5D – cue. Now West said 6D. We were a new partnership – after thought I realised this must mean no Club control, pick a suit. But I know that his suit is better than mine, 6S**. Show all On the lead of a Club*, there was no play problem. Discuss these sequences with your partner.

*A Diamond lead defeats it. hard to find on the bidding.  

**Sally and Paul were the only other pair to bid the Spade slam.

Comment
Minus 500 to Save a Grand Slam? For a 13% Score!

This fate happened to old friend Pralab at the Reform Club this week. NS only were vulnerable and South dealt. The full hand.

Almost every South opened 2H. I was North and at the vulnerability gave up on a sacrifice, pass. East Dbl, and most Wests simply 2/3 Spades. The board was played 12 times 8 times in spades for + 3. One of the advantages of BBO is that you can trace the bidding at all tables. As can be seen 7D (7S) are cold, but at all tables, Diamonds were never mentioned!

East has a 2 loser hand so surely it is worth 4 or 5C over the S raise? If West now bids D, surely at least 6D can be reached. West must see that in responding to the Dbl he would bid the same way without AQD? So should bid that suit first.

What happened to Pralab? His partner raised to 4H was doubled and lost 500.Big mistake? – sitting down.

Comment
Trump Coup

As we know teams are won by games and slam, but pairs in the part scores. Just such a hand cropped up at the Dutch club March 16. It will be easiest if we see the whole hand from the first. East deals and they only are vulnerable. Take the North seat and we will use the “over the shoulder” narrative.

 

East playing 5 Card majors opens 1C - West decides to scrape up 1S (not me Q high 5 points vulnerable, ever played for money?) North at the score decided to muddy the waters with a weak 3D. East was lured into 3S and South went 4D. Passed out. As we shall see East should recognise that his partner has little and that he is vulnerable to end plays. Clear out AD. No, 5S was the lead. Dec surveyed the dummy He needs to hope for 5D 2S 1H and 1C. One more needed. He must not lose 2 trumps. Opener has bid both black suits. so trumps smell 4-1. Work to do. Win AS continue KS (elimination) and a ruff shortening D. Now 3D to a prompt Ace. Why? smells single. What an unpleasant hand to lead from! After thought KC won by the Ace and suit returned to QC setting up dummy’s suit. He feels obliged now to lead a H and chooses 2H (his partner could have the QH – silence is golden) This loses to QH, cross over to KD. Trumps must be reduced to four, lead a club, if West does not ruff, discard a H.  Reduce the Trump suit to four with a second ruff, and exit with a H.

Whatever West does he cannot make a second trump and the contract makes. The key plays are Declarer’s trump reductions to West length,

Comment
Take a Long Look or a Deep Breath.

We see in the bridge columns that they so often point out that the mistake is at the first trick. I have a drill which is simply to pause and take a deep breath, before doing anything. There is a saying in the game “all you need to play well is to be able to count to thirteen” B4 At the Reform club 8 March was just such a hand. We will look first at the N/S cards only. Game all West deals and passes.

West passes and North opens 1D and with silent opposition continues 2C – 3C – 4NT (RKCB) – 5H (2 keys) 6C. The JD is lead covered KD and I as East took my AD and switched to 3S. Declarer took the AS, West dropped the 10S – over to you?

What actually happened? Dec crossed to AC (West showed out) and continued with QD to discard her S. I ruffed and that was that. Show all hands only two pairs bid the cold slam and both went down. Move to the second pair. West opened a weak 2D and got there in 2 bids! 2D – Dbl – 6C. crude but accurate. The play went exactly the same way.

Let us go back to the first room .Deep breath, pause. Why the  JD lead? He cannot hold the Ace nobody would underlead v slam into dummy’s suit Dummy has three entries so it will cost nothing to play low - and take the jackpot. Both major suit losers can go on D after trumps are drawn.

In room 2 I hope Declarer is no longer suffering from insomnia. West has shown 6D he is looking at 5 in dummy and one in hand that makes 13.

Comment
Ils ne passeront pas.

One of the joys of on - line bridge is that you can express your emotions, however insulting to your partner or in breach of rules, without retribution. Board 16 on March 4 took me to the cliff edge several times. I will give you my E hand only at first & my thoughts at the time of each bid. West deals and E/W only vulnerable.

Partner passes and while contemplating my strong NT North opens a weak 2H. “If I dbl partner will surely bid spades so 2NT looks best” pass and West 4S “Blast! It’s happened anyway” but help is at hand 5C!!! “Shut up partner I’ve got ‘em – Dbl” South reverts to 5H “SHUT UP that is even better!” and then….5S. “£$%^! - You just cannot get the partners these days – defeat snatched from the jaws of victory” Pass “Pass what the … can I do now”.

A H is lead and now  SHOW all four we see the whole picture. Declarer wins the AH dropping the 2C and cashes the JS discovering the 5 – 0 break. I knew all along it was my most valuable card. Draws trumps. When QJD drop has 12 tricks. All this has taken some time! We are cut off by the TD who awards us an average, later corrected to 5SX. We protest that it should be +1 and eventually he awards us the top score.

“Absolutely brilliant Partner. Never doubted you for a moment”

 Nobody does a volte face better than me.

The French have a word for it.

Comment
No Rules Just Guidelines.

In these columns I regularly point out that there are no absolutes in the game. Perhaps the oldest adage “people are sleeping rough who did not draw trumps” has to be balanced by “an equal number are with them who did”.

 Which cliché does this one violate? North deals & vulnerable. He opens 1D you overcall 1H, they continue with your side silent – 2NT- 3NT. Partner leads 8H, and this is what you see.

You get the 8H lead dummy plays low and you the QH ducked by Declarer. On your KH Dec wins the Ace and plays a D, West goes in with the KD to preserve your entry and….switches…. to a S. Dec continues D but wins the third H and cashes out.                    show full hand.

Yes . “ third hand plays LOW” this preserves West second H.

Comment
You Have Never Seen Everything.

One of the charms of our game is that every deal is different you never know what is happening next.  Game all IMPs. You take the North seat and pick up.

S. J87542  H.92   D.95 C. A98. Partner South deals and your side is silent as opponents bid smoothly.

1D – 1H -1NT (12-14) - 2S – 3H – 6H all pass. The JC is lead and this is what you see.

Dummy plays low, East the 7C and its your move? Read on when you have decided.

Prospects look bleak. The majors look good for at least 9 tricks, East clearly has KC so surely three minor suit winners. Ideas?  let us look at partners lead of JC. When partner does something highly unusual there should be a good reason. Why the JC? Declarer is known to be short, but the 10C is on the table so it is unusual to say the least. Or unusually high – the penny drops - it is a Mc Kenney for a S, Show full hand.

In R2 they bid :

1D – 1S - 1NT – 3H – 3S- 4Nt- 5H -6S. On a club lead I will draw a veil over the result.

What is wrong with a simple 6NT over the 1NT?

Comment
No Hiding Place.

On- line today we are playing a lot of match point bridge, where the worst thing that can happen is a bottom. When we switch to teams, we forget that one board can decide a match. Moreover, tactics and the score loom large. In the league the other day, we were +7 at the half, we had been presented with a doubled game and at B21 felt we were ahead, still – we were.

This was the hand EW only vulnerable N deals.

Let us have a look first at R1. RAC N/S Dealer passed 1S was opened, silent opponents bid 1S – 2H – 4C (splinter, key bid)   4NT – 5D – (3 keys) 6H. Loses just to AD.

R2 They had given away the doubled game so were losing. North decided to try 3C and the obvious 3S was bid. Now South realised that his side was defenceless and went for the advance sacrifice – 6C. No hiding place for West! Two weeks ago, I wrote that “when opponents bid on in these situations it means they think you can make” Six spades may lose two tricks. But is it a match loser if you are wrong? If you pass it may well be so. The difference between +1430 or +300.     

Comment
Strange Results on 13.

Board often produces some strange results. North deals at Game All. It is the second half of most matches and teams are considering their positions. I sat North on 4 Feb and we will see all four hands.

We were silent and they bid 1D (second in hand vul 10 points weak suits UGH!)- 1S - 2D – 2H pass!!! I lead 10C Dec went up with the Ace and contrived to win just 8 tricks. Now let us go to the other extreme v the runaway winners Howard and Simone. This time the bidding: 3 Passes 1S -- 2D – 3H – 4NT (another premature leap the bid is 4C). 5D (you tell me) 5H sign off – 6H (got my response wrong - I think) This should be made but scored –2.

The results were 3 x 4H 3X 4H-1 3X 3NT with varying.

Work on 6H on the D lead it is an exercise in trump control and selection of the right options.

Baffling

Comment
Back to work in the League.

RAC Morgan whipped by Marina found itself back in D1of the Business Houses League. A couple of well deserved languishes lower down have taken place before we pulled ourselves together. We had two matches this week and in the first were -12 at the half. There were three Grand Slams on offer and our failure to match opponents in the first cost us the half time lead. However, this hand Bd 16 (24) let us out with a winning draw.

You will have the advantage of all the hands. Love all West deals.

Let us go first to Room 1 Terry obviously wished to pre-empt (what is your bid?) and chose 3S. This was passed out and the nine tricks +140.

In R2 I was North and Isabelle South. This time they opened 4S, I passed, two unknown hands to come. Isabelle, knowing we were behind is not one to hide behind the Maginot line and decided to protect with 5C. I was delighted but East went one more 5S.  Back to me.

  1. When the opponents bid on in these situations, it means they think you can make 5C.
  2. Know that even if they are wrong 5SX will be cheap.
  3. Look again at my hand. We are at the 5 level and I must have great cards AS KJxx C that P knows nothing about.
  4. I too know 5SX will be cheap and went to 6C.

This makes easily. Our suspicions confirmed when they declined to double. Notice too how the 4S goaded us to compete. Take the East cards over 4S and ask yourself “would I let them play 5C/D ?” if that is the case 5S is the  winner. But, huge risk.

Ah well another Grand Slam missed.

Comment
What do you open? A final Mystery.

Two deals (B17) after the Board I reported last week. I dealt at Love All and collected this. Just my hand at first.

 North only

What is your opening bid? What is your system? This is a great hand for 8 playing trick 2S. Or Benjamin 2C (ditto ) but we like many others were playing 3 weak 2s. I do not like the 4S (pre-empt) I have just 13 points leaving 27 for everyone else, not least my Partner. Take away my AS and I would bid the same but have near zero defensive values. Your move? I settled on 1S and East joined us with 2H. South 3NT (excellent practical bid) your move again?

Partnership confidence was not high at this point! I have 8.5 playing tricks. But require at least KH and two aces. Would a simple 4NT (RKCB) be understood? Or 4C advance cue bid? We needed points so I gambled 6S promptly doubled by East and the KC lead. Show wholehand . I won the Ace drew trumps and lead toward KH +1680.

The board was played 8 times 6S x2 for the top and 6NT – 1 for the bottom. The bidding here was 2C (all purpose game force) 2D 2S 4NT 5H 6NT. This is not good bidding. South has no idea what North’s hand is – the weakness of the “all purpose” bid. Others opened 4S and were passed out.

So what is the mystery? Two other pairs bid to 6S but went off -1 How? Why?

Comment
A Comedy of Errors

I have acquired a new Mentee it is fair to say he is not finding it an armchair ride. He is intelligent, keen and progress is being made. He will I hope not resent this: B15 The Dutch Club S deals N/SVul.

Let us see all four hands. I will tell it from my North seat.

South opens with his awkward 1444. There are various opinions on what is best. Rule one is do not open a suit you do not want lead. I would bid 1H. South opens 1D and opponents (Sally &Paul who won the event silent)  North now the obvious 1S and South 2C (5- 4 probably minimum). It would be great if P had three spades, or a H stop. I bid - 2H - FSF tell me more – this draws the response 4H!

 One should not support the second suit without four. So why not 2/3 NT?   Well we cannot play in 4H so let us come out into 5D. But the reply came– 5H – yes you will. Now the ethics here are tricky you are not allowed to salvage P error / misunderstanding. You must assume he knows the system. Nothing has been said about S so all I could think of was, protect the KS and play the hand myself -- 6 NT. This was doubled and I received a low H to my J, (great card).

The play is obvious. AD (maybe a single Q), JC to the QC (maximum flexibility) KH is taken by AH and they switch to a spade. D finesse wins! and Q drops. Cash out +1680. Never double slams but of course it matters not. Nobody else bid the slam. I wonder why?

Comment
The Negative Double.

Playing on - line I have noticed that the negative X is rarely used. I find this odd. A typical situation – Partner opens 1D and RHO overcalls 2C, You hold one or more 4 card + majors or one major and - say XXX  D. Not good enough to go to the 2 level but wish to show both suits soonest A Neg X is the bid. It does not advance the level of the auction. Can of course be strong or weak. Board 8 Dutch club was instructive 5 Jan. West deals. Love all. Opens 1H. North - 1S. Sounds like they have a big S fit and a pre-empt is coming. Could be a D sacrifice? Now or never X, as expected – 4S. Take the West seat. If partner wanted to play in H he would have said so. He must have minors, but which is best? 4NT – pick a suit. N/S have eleven tricks. EW go one off in 5D and lose – 300 - for the EW top in 6DX. Our opponents showed their respect for us by going one more and we with our two aces decided to stop, still giving us an above average score.

Be sure you make more use of this convention. It is particularly valuable playing 5 Card majors and a short minor.

Comment
The Ruff and Discard Defence

I wrote recently about a method to defeat 4S using a repeated ruff and discard play. We are taught from the cradle that to give a ruff in one hand and a discard of a loser in the other is a blunder. But in this game, there are no absolute rules. N/S were vulnerable on this deal. West your partner deals and passes. North -1D and you hold:

You decide to bid 3H and South closes the auction with 4S. Partner leads KH and you see Dummy. You overtake – could be single - and continue, all follow. Your move?

All the minor suit finesses are working the only hope is a second trump trick. The most important card you have is? The 9S! A third H and … now see all hands. Dec ruffs high but West must not over ruff, If he does the second trump trick vanishes. 

A Happy New Year to all my 6+ readers, may we live in less interesting times.  

Comment
Reform Club Christmas Individual.

The Reform Club organised an individual on 21 Dec. We are all (or most of us) in Tier 4 so why not? We all (44) had to play simple Acol and change Partners every 2 Boards.  Well organised, played in the Christmas spirit and good fun. Well, done Reform!

I occupied a triumphant 15th place. I got this one wrong and just two pairs bid the small slam.

These were the East West hands. North deals and passes, love all.

East too strong for 1NT opened 1D and with oppos silent I responded 1S. 1NT came back from my partner whom I had never encountered before. A combined 32+ points we are in the slam zone. My first instinct was to bid 4C, but would this be understood? In the end I simply bid 4S. I cannot blame my P who got no great info me, when he took the view that he had bid his hand and passed.

How should it be bid?  1D – 1S - 1NT – 4C. (cue bid guarantees good long S.) 4H (cue bid I like S) – 4NT  RKCB. – 5S (two keys and QS) – 6 D (Has the AD) - 7S

Not ideal for an individual! 

Comment
The Four Three Fit

The four three fit throws real challenges for Declarer. The first thing to remember is a 3-3 break is 36% so you must initiate play in the basis that trumps will not break. This was B13 in the 10 /12 event.

After two passes South opened 2NT. North considered an immediate 3NT but wary of his single Club decided to try Stayman 3C. Doubled by East South 3H back to North. S could still have 4-4 Majors so he tried 3S a hesitant S, 4S. He too has no club stop. The JD was lead. There are winners to burn so it is all about trump control, The AD was taken followed by AS. Over to QH and 2S (not the 10) JS, QS and KS. West KC and another. Dec knows that shortening his hand must guarantee one down and discards 2D (winner on loser!) but a third club can now be ruffed in Dummy, over to AH and draw trumps. Game made.

East wondered if the X of 3C had diverted N/S into the Spade contract? But note that 4S should be defeated. East follows his Partner’s double and plays AC and another. Dec has the same problem and declines to ruff, but continuing ruffs and discards destroys the hand.

Comment
Weird Results in the Sims.

Woodcote staged a heat of the Sims pairs 7 December. It always throws up a few interesting hands. I found the results on B10 astonishing. We will need to see the East West cards only. East dealt at Love All.

The hand in 6D played by East is unbeatable. Best defence would be a club to the A and a H return but that is 12 tricks. The Bd was played 16 times. 5 x 3NT, 2 x 5D, 3 x 4H, 4 x 3H and two pairs bid the slam. But only one made - the other playing in 6H-1. I questioned the bottom score pair. They were playing 2C as an Acol 8 playing trick hand and got 2D the standard relay. Why? If P has 8 tricks and you are looking at 3.5 you are in the slam zone so alert P soonest 2S. Over 2D East had to go 3D (setting the suit) and now West 3H, again what for? The last suit you would want to play in unless he has AQJX. This must have happened several times as 7 pairs played in H. Now what should East do? He decided on 4H. Surely now was the time for 4S? but fatally West bid 4NT, what is the agreed suit? My view is that it is D but it does not matter since it has 2 keys and the Q in both cases - 5S, then 6H. Why not 6D offering the choice? The jewel in the crown S.AKQ never mentioned.  Losing of course AC and a trump.

How should it be bid? The 2D response could have worked well as West would play the hand protecting KC. What is wrong with 2C – 2S – 3D- 3NT – 6D? A catch all 2C opener would go similarly.

Once P has opened with a big hand do not bid valueless suits.

Comment
One that got away.

RAC entered the Hurlingham Swiss Teams on 5 December. team Marina Lester Isabelle and me. I first discovered that it was on Real Bridge – unproven software– very late, and that my desktop did not have a camera after about 3 hours consultation! The event started about 30 mins late with 26 teams. So I was not the only one with problems. Unannounced also was that the scoring was not genuine swiss teams, it was decided not on Victory Points but IMPs. The effect of that is that if you draw a weak team and run up a cricket score early on, all of it is caried forward. That said it was good fun and the software when refined will be good.

It’s only a game.

 I found B30 last hand, intriguing. Take the East hand only and consider your bid.

North deals and passes, playing 5 card majors, you open 1S and with silent opponents, partner responds 1NT. Your move?

 One of several reasons why I dislike ST is that one board in the 5 can often decide the match. To bid games is essential. I find it impossible to criticise Isabelle for her pass, the two minor honours look a decider.   Show full hand

As you can see on 3D lead I took +150. But 4H is cold. The Board was played 26 times but only in 4H five times. Going down just once. On the best lead a trump win the QH and lead QD play to ruff two minor cards and make 7 trumps and three minors.

Comment
The Importance of the Partscore.

We all know that Slams and high – level competitive decisions win matches. In Match point pairs play, a trick gained or lost can be as important as a Grand Slam. I work with the Elite team on – line (Paul, Sally, Michael, David M) and this came up, the other day. We will show all 4 hands immediately to follow the play a little easier.

N/S silent E/W 1NT (12-14) – 2♣ (Stayman) – 2 (no 4 major) – 2♠. The 8♣ (from 2 or MUD from 3) is led and we will first seat you in South. Plan your defence. Declarer plays the 2♣ to the 10 and the A♣. Count the points. Dummy plus you, adds to 21, partner did not double 2♣, has led a short suit so he sounds like 12-14 which would leave West with 6-9. With 6♠ W would make a simple transfer, so he sounds like 5-4 in majors. Declarer leads to the A♠ and cashes K♣[1] North follows with 9♣ (showing 3) to discard 2 and continues with 3♠ to the 10 and North J. He takes K♠ the 4♣ follows and is ruffed with 5♠. The 10[2] comes next and is covered by the J and the K wins and another played to 5[3] and loses to the A. A to the Ace and the third round of played. Declarer makes 3 ♠ 2 A and AK♣.

Take a breather and I will give a clue the fn[1] represent errors, but by whom, and why? Can the contract be beaten? There are many lessons here the most important is probably timing. Winners can be taken at any time, but once taken the become irrelevant


  1. Sit West now. The lead of 8♣ suggests that all N points are elsewhere. Count your tricks. Hopefully 3 trumps 2 ♣ 1 and hopefully 1 . Where is the 8th? Maybe the 4th . Could the J♠ be well placed? What is the defence strategy?
    They know your trumps are fragile and continual club leads will lose you control. Dec crossed to A♠ cashed K♣ to discard a . But further exposing your hand to the club force. Why now?
  2. A no win play. The K we think is well placed. We, are not concerned about trick 2 only trick four in for two tricks.
  3. Last chance when the is lead from dummy South must rise with the Q. South has the last club to complete the force and now the defence comes to two . If the K♣ is not cashed prematurely this position does not arise.
Comment
Combatting the Pre-Empt

We were pleased to welcome Arun Suri as an entry for the Roz Bob Pairs. His name is on many of our cups often with Bob. He and his partner Geoff Foley were stuck on 50% after 20 boards. A huge second half saw them rise to 5th. An average and a near top set them off, this was 23. South deals at game all and take Arun’s seat at first.

South passed and the bidding proceeded 2S (weak) Dbl – 4S*. Oh dear! First chance to bid is at level 5. But with two first round controls and a singleton in their suit, how do we convey that quickly to Partner? Arun bid 4NT (two places to play) thinking probably both minors – 5C. – 5D (red suits) North now realised perfect fit and raised to 6D.       

Show All.            

The KS was lead and while one trump had to be lost repeated club finesses brought it home. Only one other pair bid this.

*This went for 1100 at other tables.

Comment
Something in the Air Again?

Terry Smith remarked that it seemed to him that on- line the suits were longer and the breaks uneven. We all know that a random deal is exactly that, and the imperfect shuffle at home does produce more balanced hands. I must say. that I feel that against me bad trump breaks seem to abound. All that said the bridge is not dull! I found B11 from the Dutch club 10 / 11 baffling. South deals, Love All.

I watched this hand It will be easier to follow if we see all four hands. West opened 1S and North 2H, East decided on 4H, (splinter guarantees, good four+ support) – P – 4S (minimum opener 5S at least)– P -  5C (they are good lets offer the sacrifice) – 5H  - 5S - P -  6C !! and to my astonishment - Pass . How can you pass Partner’s repeated cue bid with a suit agreed? Thirteen tricks rolled in. “Bottom” I shouted at the screen. What do I know 83% the score? Just three pairs bid 6C+1 The remainder played in Spade games, 6S + 1 would take the Top. You have agreed the suit why not at least put Partner back into it? Tell Partner what he does not know, 6D. Now he can count 13 tricks - 7S.                                                                                                                   Another pair told me they began the same way but “chickened out after 4S”.

 On a three loser hand ?

Comment
Second Sight? Blind Luck? Jupiter Aligned with Mars?

The other day I was Declarer, this was the heart suit. Dummy 753 Me AQ82. I lead towards my hand, played the Ace and the King dropped on my left. I was asked how I knew? Of course, I did not, but I had to lose a H anyway so why not just see if the “moon is in the seventh house”. Try this one as South. With EW silent both players overbid to 4S. East deals and passes. They bid 1S - 2C – 2S -3S – 4S. The 6D is lead to AD and 2D. Now 10D ducked and a third D to West who returns 3H to the KH and your Ace. There is only one entry to Dummy. AC and KC East drops QJC as you dispose of 10H.  QS from Dummy to the 5S and your move.

With the hint above You play the AS but why? Think it through before looking at the full deal. Show All.

First count Easts hand. He has 3D and 2C his partner lead 3H so they look 4-4. In which case his distribution is 4441and if so, the KS cannot be caught. But there is an easier answer. Count East points. KH AD QJC, give him the KS and he would not have passed. Well has “Jupiter aligned with Mars” ?

Comment
Some thoughts on Defence. Where is the Setting trick?

When you kibitz on - line, if you are allowed, anxieties about cheating inhibit this, you observe some basic faults. Let us assume that you are defending 1NT and your partner makes a promising lead to your AKx. It looks as though you have probably 3/4 tricks in the suit, when Declarer’s presumed stop is knocked out. But the first thought should be, you need at least three more tricks to defeat the contract. Look again at your holding. Your AK are not just cashable tricks but entries to your hand. The danger hand for the contractor is always on his right through him. Are these your last two entries? Say you cash them and lead a third to Declarers Q. Dec starts to develop his suits and P wins. He can cash his winner(s) but what next? You must not cash out early but give P a clue of where to go after he, cashes his winners. The point being of course that at that level you probably need 3 more winners to defeat 1NT.

An example: You are East, deal, and open 1C, South overcalls 1S and North raises to game. Partner leads to your AC  KC and South’s QC and see:

Your move? Decide before looking at the full hand. You are looking at three Aces, assuming they are winners, where is our setting trick? Count Dec tricks. Looks like he has six trump winners and only one losing club. That means that he has six red cards and if that is true once the AD is knocked out enough D tricks for the game. Partner clearly has next to nothing. The only card he can have of value is JH.  You must lead the suit right now and find out. Show All.

You can make two H and two minor Aces for one down.

Comment
Real Bridge and the Dreaded two Game Swing.

Sally and Paul played in this mode, first brought to my notice by Fay Lucas. I am not interested, a couple of times a week will do for me. Have a look at it everybody, they will help you. Paul drew my attention to this hand which cost his team the match. It is simpler if we see the full hand. East deals at Game all.

With all four in sight we can see that the cards lie favourably for both sides. EW can make 6C. (spade lead best, AS, AD, club to Q &AC. KD then QD and a ruff establishes the suit. Back to 5C and a discard on last D)

NS with the H finesse winning just loses 3 Aces in 4H. The stage is set, What actually, happened? In R2 they opened 3C dealer Vulnerable! Not me! but another case of “the wrong thing at the right time”. West 3NT and 11 tricks roll in. In R1 Paul declined to bid, and S passed to West 1D. North now 2D – Michaels - showing the majors. Paul now fell from grace and passed. He asked afterwards was I too cautious? While his hand has just one ace, it has a 7 suit and one secondary control. Look again, he has only three major suit cards. If North must have 10/11 cards in those suits, then Partner must have minors. When Paul passed South went 4H and this was passed out and made for – 16 Imps. 

Comment
An Optical Illusion.

When playing match pointed pairs, we are always conscious that overtricks can be the difference between a top and bottom score. Sometimes this can distract us from reality. This was B6 from 15 October. East deals and E/W are silent. South and North bid Pass- 1S - 2H - 3C – 3S – 4S.  East leads 9D and this is what Declarer N sees.

He takes the AD and can see that if S behave there are 9 tricks in NT. He takes the finesse and draws trumps in three rounds. What now?  IF the AH is in West then you are home. If you run JH and it catches the AH also home. Finally, if Clubs are 3-3 that also succeeds. Make your mind up and the look at the whole hand. Show full hand.

At the table Dec guessed the H wrong and when clubs failed to break went down. Did you see the mistake? The H finesse is an illusion. After the third S, lead KH they win, cash their D and continue. Dec wins and plays another H, He makes 5S 1H 1D and 3C.

Oh Dear! It was a Sure Trick problem all along!

  

    

Comment
Dropped Catch. Board 11 Dutch Club. 6 October.

I dropped a catch in the deep playing with Pralab. I think it will be easier to follow if we see all four hands from the first.

South passed as dealer and West 1S – 2D – Dbl (Neg) – pass – and W 3S. (one too many on a broken suit, at least two out of three top honours and six suit needed). East now tried 3NT which was not contested. The 4D was lead to the KD and continued the suit. With all four hands on view it is clear, that a H switch defeats the game, but North underlead to the QD and a S discarded. If four Clubs can be made with two D we have 8 tricks. Can anything be done with the broken S? Declarer decided to try. S. 4,8,9,10*.  N cashed AD and another D continued. It looks now as if N has at least 4S and 5D. A club is lead to the KC and when the 8 drops N might be short. The AC confirms this and 10C finesse, gives the suit. North throws 5, 6S and H.4. AH – 9H continues and another S discarded, now we know that the H finesse loses. I feared the loss and two more through KJS. But I failed to do my homework. North has 5D 1C two H in which case he has started with 5S and South is void of the suit. A low H now and South is endplayed. Others went more down and -50 was worth 83%             Little balm.

*This a better play than it looks communications are severed.

Comment
Maximising the Options.

This intriguing hand came at the Dutch Club on 28 September. First see N/S only (rotated for convenience) North deals, at Love All.

North opened a text book, 1 (4 cards) E/W silent. The South hand has many of the points I have been talking about. It has only 13 points, but three first round controls – Aces – and one second round. The first thought was a splinter 4 agreeing , but there is no need to rush so 1♠. North bid 3♠ (not minimum 4 Card support for ♠). Ah! Double fit. It looks impossible to diagnose exact cards so South went straight to 6♠. The 10 was lead. Plan the play?

The slam is not cast iron. Playing in 4♠ (only one pair bid 6♠) the easiest method is to duck the lead which surely loses to the K. Now if the trumps break 2-2 there are 12 tricks. Playing in 6♠ losing to K immediately means that trumps must be played for no loser. If we do lose a trump there is still the hope of 4 tricks. Who is more likely to hold 3♠? West has length so is the favourite to be short. A Spade to the K♠ draws J♠. Restricted choice now says finesse the 10♠ but If you do that and it wins then you cannot draw the stray as you need trumps in Dummy for club ruffs. ♠ to the Ace and Q♠ drops. Now just 3 tricks are needed. There is a well know safety play here. Up to the K – the 9 and the 3. The 2 from Dummy and if East follows, we play 8 and if that loses the suit breaks 3-2. If he shows out win A and lead towards the J.

Home! Show all four. At the table when 2 was lead the 10 went in. Worse still a ♣ was ruffed and when 2 was lead East went in with K! But it made no difference.

The slam took all the match points.

Comment
The Onlooker Sees More of The Game.

Kibitzing On - Line has become more difficult due to the cheating scandals that have erupted. In the early days I was allowed, to Kibitz.  Warned (rightly) not to comment. I watched the club pairs of 17 September and this was B17. Let us see the N/S hands only first and could I ask you to bid them with your partner?

At the table (silent E/W) North deals and passes at Love All.

1S - 2C – 2H – 3S – 4S Pass. My immediate reaction was – bottom- 6S, 6H just requires 3-2 break in one major suit for the slam. 6C is also cold. What do I know? This game scored an overtrick and 43%. Look at the whole hand for an explanation. Show All. Long ago we were taught that the 4-4 fit was most desirable, and this hand is a prime example. Neither major breaks so 6S loses 2 tricks. 6H is cold because you can ruff 2D. But 7C – never mentioned is the easiest of the lot. How should it be bid? 1S -2C- 2H now the key bid. Never support the second bid suit without four. 3H must be invitational and now South must say 4C, costs nothing shows the double fit and most importantly the 5-4-4. shape and therefore a D void. North is now looking at two 4-4 fits and can ruff D losers so HE MUST play it. 6C now gives South a chance but the superior suit beckons while 7C can be bid 6H is the most likely outcome.

Comment
You are big but Partner opens in your void!

Big hands with shape are difficult to bid at the best of times. When your partner opens the bidding with your void and the opponents pre-empt it is difficult. These circumstances combined on B2 from the Reform on 14 September. I think it will be simplest if we give you all four hands.

South with just 6 losers but only 10 points decided to open 1D, West a weak jump to 3C* and I was in the hot seat with my 4 loser, hand and void. First decision, these days the negative X is normal showing at least one major with D tolerance or both majors. East passes** and South 3S. Back to North. Partner has bid on just S.xxxx sounds like 4S – 6D minimum. North obviously fears the loss of two clubs. If the 3C is to be believed P points must all be red suits. He bid 5S and now the baton falls to South. What does 5S mean? “Do not worry about trump strength there are no losers there”. South at the table said, “I opened light have no trump honours Pass” Look again while that view is true. It has controls. Second round in both Hearts and Clubs. AD, the first two secondaries are crucial and should be recognised. Not easy! Nobody bid it, (ruff second club, draw Trumps, ruff H and claim) 5C went for 800 for the N/S top. Main point controls

* Personally. I go 4C at the vulnerability

** Notice that if East supports Clubs it is much easier to guess the singleton

Comment
These Plays should be Second Nature – but are they?

Back in the 70s I played in Caracas and encountered David Berah (played in the Bermuda Bowl) and I was lucky to play a few times with him. He said to me one day “you are taking too long thinking about the routine plays and tiring out your brain unnecessarily”.

You may know that I work with The Elite Business houses team and this thought all too often occurs to me. Let us say this suit is trumps and divided KQ106 – A975 How should it be played? The 3-2 break is 62% so mostly it will not matter but suppose you begin with the ACE and LHO shows out on the second round. Now you realise you could have avoided the loss. The simple principle here is play the cards in such a way that you maximise the info. So the first play is small towards the Q, up to the double honour first.

Now let us go to defence. Declarer leads towards KQ106 and you hold J843. You must play the 8 It may not work but sometimes he will think that your Partner is long and play the second honour from dummy.

Or this one – trumps again. QJ1075 – A43. You begin with the Q covered in tempo by the K. You win A and play one back and now discover that 9862 was on the right. Go back and this time start with J this too is covered in tempo. What conclusion do you draw? Opponent does not know where the Q is and so you might conclude that the K was forced and finesse the 7 on the way back.

In defence playing 3NT your opening lead is won by Partner who switches to the 9 and Declarer plays the K You hold AJ2 with three small in dummy. The 9 denies the 10 so declarer must have KQ10 you must duck and hope P has another chance to give you a second winner. If you win A you cannot continue.

Nothing here is difficult but these plays are missed too often.

Comment
Another Slam Missed?

I have written many times about the Circle’s weakness in the slam zone. It showed again the other day. This time let us look at the West hand only and the problem faced. Love All North deals.

 

Dealer opens a natural 1♣ and Partners says 1♠, passed to you. With your shape and first round club control plus single clearly 4♠ is a must. To your surprise Partner now bids 5 passed again to you. What is going on? Partner knows you have a big ♠ fit and very few points, so 5 must be a serious slam try. He has not bid 5 so he does not have first round control of that suit. He has not used Blackwood so the 5 sounds like a void. If he had and ♠ his first bid would be a to X. Surely not clubs, missing the A♣. Sounds like he has . What does he want from you? It can only be control of the club suit. 6♣ is the bid. At the time West signed off in 5♠. Missed!

Time to see four hands. The slam is laydown. Just one pair bid it. But they used Blackwood getting the one key reply. How did they know it was not the useless A?

The old rule applies – tell P what he does not know.

Comment
A Change of Plan is Forced.

The great Military Strategist von Moltke is credited with saying “No plan survives the first contact with the enemy”. An experienced player seemingly did not recall this adage on B.15 from the Reform Club on 31 August. 

South opened a weak 2H and all passed. The 8C was lead to the AC and the suit returned to KC. It looks easy does it not? Six Trumps KC and AD. However, when the 4H is lead to the AH East discards a C. 

Ouch! The Club suit is clearly 6-2 and the H 5-0. If anyone had four or more S they would surely have competed, so the whole hand is an open book. We might as well see all four hands. But before you do, plan the play.

 Show full hand.

The tactic on such hands is not to draw trumps. You are taking two of yours for just one of their losers.Second secure your side suit winners first. Shorten your own trump suit so that they have longer trumps than you and can be endplayed to your KQ9.

AD throw a S, ruff a D. JC and it is not so easy to see but West must throw 4D. Ruff with JH (5 tricks) and the third D East covers and mindful of the overruff chuck another S. Sooner or later declarer makes three more trump tricks. This play was not made.  At the time it turned 62% into 12%.

Comment
Beware of Greek gifts

Assuming North finds a passive lead there is no way for West to bring in 4S without the assistance of south, but first let's have a look at the bidding. Opposite an opening of 1S the only logical response is 1NT, and some Wests will have felt they have heard enough and bid 4♠. I prefer 3♠ because it gives East a chance to evaluate the prospects given the likely dangers of poor communications. In any event it is hard to see this contract ending anywhere else than 4♠.

North has an unappetising choice of leads, personally I favour a neutral spade, but what is for sure is that a diamond or a club will hand declarer the contract. So how about a heart, interestingly enough this proves effective, and doubly so if declarer is lured into running the lead round to the Queen as now the dummy is dead. In any case who is going to lead from the K? So up with the Ace and try the Queen of Diamonds. If south is tempted to insert the K it is all over for the defence. Declarer wins with the Ace and plays spades until North eventually wins with the Jack.

When declarer regains the lead he can now finesse the 9 which proves the old adage that you should only cover an honour with an honour when there is something to promote, which in this case there is not.

Comment
Going to the Limit.

The preempt bid in the modern game is more deadly than ever. Each hand must be taken to its limit and the better the information available the easier life becomes. Look at this hand from the Dutch Club on 18 August. Love all dealer East. All four hands: Oh how the participants wished this had applied to them!

At only one table East took the first key decision. Everybody else opened 3♣ but he decided to go to the limit with 4♣. As we can see this was a great moment, I will come back to what happened, and discuss the options. I wrote some time ago about the overvalued Q and South has three! The major suits are useless unless they are opposite some top honours and/or some length. North will have more information when it is his turn. The best bid is Pass. West passes too and North takes the stage. Minor suit Preempts are usually intended to shut out the majors so South must have but a suit not good enough to bid. North with a four loser hand would like to play in game, but which one? Now we see the damage the extra level 4♣ has done. Decisions now are instant. Think, on the basis that the barrage was designed to attack majors and bid 4♠. This of course silences all. On the lead of A and another ♣ a complete cross ruff brings home 6♠.

Let us go back to what happened at the time. South – doubled – and North bid 4. Then 4. Now the partner should recognise that if the suit had been playable he would have come in over 4♣. At the time the 4 was passed out for down 3.

The key point here is always, remember you have an intelligent Partner who may make better decisions than you with additional information.

Comment
There was something in the air.

The popular song from ABBA put this line into every body’s conscious. It occurred to me that when you are in the slam zone and deciding whether to stay in six or push on seven. We all feel the air getting thinner. Why is this? The reason usually is fear. Am I throwing away a sure six in pursuit of the Grail?

This was Board 11 in the 6 August pairs. South deals Love All it will simplest if we see the whole hand immediately.

As can be seen 7 is cold. Five trumps two Spades and a ruff three diamonds and two clubs. The board was played 8 times. Five pairs bid 6, one 6NT (makes just 12), and two stopped at 4.

Online examination of the bidding shows that most pairs that bid it, bashed their way there, Something like 1♣ – 1 – 4 – 6 and variations.

One pair were annoyed with themselves. They bid: 1 NT (15-17) – 2 (transfer) 3 an excellent bid. I am max and have four card support for . North now knows he is in the slam zone. He has three Aces and a K – 4♣ (first round control) – 4 (nothing new to say) – 5 (first round control again). We are definitely going to 6. Now South (in a scratch pairing) who had bid beautifully up till then, let the air get to them and instead of 5♠ bid 5NT. North thought this denied A♠ and simply bid 6. Pity, a good sequence.

There was one more twist to this hand; two of the 6 bidders did not make the overtrick.

Smelling salts needed in the thin air?

Comment
Play this hand with me.

In 1983 Terence Reese published “Play these hands with me” It took the reader into the mind of Declarer as he played a contract. Here I use the same format. Guilty of plagiarism, but the hand is original about 10 days old.

You are East you pick up these cards: Love all, partner deals and passes you open in East v silent opponents – 1NT (12-14) response is 2C (Stayman) – 2H - 2NT and with a max and most importantly 3 Aces.  3NT.  This what you see after South leads 4D.

Count the tricks. On the lead we have two D, three H and AS. Work to do! The spade suit is “frozen” which means whoever opens the suit can concede two tricks. That must wait and hope they are forced to do so first. We have three top H a 4-3 break is 62% but to that we can add the possibility that the JH is guarded no more than twice. On the 4D we play 2D and North takes a long time to play the 5D and we win the QD. Clearly, we need two Club tricks to at least give us   8 tricks. We lead 2C to the 9 we play to give us maximum flexibility on entries either hand) the 3C follows, and 9C loses to the JC.

Further thought and the 3D comes from North to your AD and South 6D. Clearly the King is in South and the suit is 4-3. We try another C and up comes the QC covered by KC and North wins the AC. Great!

 Long thought and 3H to our 8H and South 4H and QH wins. Cash KH. 6. 9. 2H. Overtake the preserved 7C with the 8C and “time out”.

South is now 4D and just two clubs, If he were short in spades. on the bidding he might have lead them through dummy. So he could have the KS. We try a low S to the Q and if it loses the last hope is the J falling from either major. In practise up comes KS, he cashes KD and we have the rest.

 Phew!  

Comment
Loser on Loser Another Look

Two weeks ago, I wrote about a loser on loser play. This manoeuvre is more common than appears and has various uses.

  1. Disposing of a loser from one hand while establishing a winner in the suit played.
  2. Forcing the opponents to lead into, as opposed to through the danger hand.
  3. When you want to ruff in one suit but know you will be overruffed the play enables you to transfer the ruff to another suit.
  4. Putting an opponent on lead who is then obliged to make a play favourable to you. If you have studied all this. you will not find this hand too tricky.

West opens 1, N/S bid to 4, and receive A lead, and West switches 10♣. You count 7 trumps, two black Aces and if either black Q can win you have your game. However the immediate switch to ♣ (a safe trump available) strongly, suggests that the K is not well placed. Your move?
Show all four hands

Once you take that view then in order to justify his opening W must have the K♠. Win the A♣ and play 10 throwing your losing ♣. On the club continuation ruff draw two trumps to dummy and establish your winner discarding a ♠.

As I have said look for this type of play it is more frequent than you think.

Comment
Thinking Ahead in Competitive Auctions.

Once you get into competitive auctions you need to consider not only whether you wish to bid on, double or Pass but what might happen if you exercise any one of those options. Consider South’s problem on B13 from the Reform club event 20 July.

Dealer opens 4H and East after thought –Pass and you consider your hand. Partner vulnerable 1st to speak must be decent – good suit, length 7/8 at least AQJ. You are not unhappy with an Ace, a singleton, and good support – you pass. West after thought bids 5C and two passes back to you. Your first thought is 5H, you could double, but where are, three defensive, tricks coming from? Hearts will surely be useless with either 12 or 13 between N/S. A heart lead may concede an immediate ruff and discard. Suppose you bid 5H what now, if they go 6C? Or simply Pass. There are your options. Your bId? Decide before you look at the whole hand.   Show full hand.   

Did you bid 5H? This goes down just one and 5C is cold, but they bid on to 6C and all pass. Partner puts the AH on the table West ruffs, leads a Spade losing to the AS and when that suit breaks 3-3 enables the discard of three losing D from hand.

 Go back to the problem over 5C. Only you know that AH will not take a trick so you must consider what you want Partner to lead if they go one more, you must bid 5D you will not be allowed to play it of course and when they go 6C Partner finds the killing lead.     

Comment
Strategic Planning When Dummy Goes Down.

Playing online, particularly when kibitzing throws mistakes into the headlights. I have been giving the Elite team (Coach) a hard time on dummy play. Key errors.

  1. Failure to plan at trick one.
  2. Premature drawing of trumps.
  3. Inadequate thought to problems that might arise.
  4. Assessment of options.

I came across this innocent looking hand from 50 years ago.

South opens 1♠, is raised to 2♠ and goes to 4♠. The Q♣ is lead.

 Count your tricks.

If the trumps are 2-2 we have six ♠, three aces and K♣. So, the first assumption we make is that we have a losing ♠. Of course, that may not be true. We are in danger of losing a trick in each suit.  Any ideas?

Only the suit offers any hope. Do we test trumps first? If the can be established, we need every entry in dummy. Win A♣ cash A♠ (no worse than 3-1) A and another, losing to Q. J♣ to the K♣ and J. If East ruffs we overruff and our possible trump loser vanishes. He does not. East J and we discard our remaining club. West wins and switches to a . Ace wins and now we go to K♠ and discover that our pessimism was justified. Show all hands But now our losing goes on the 9 and we are home.

Look again at the 1-4 faults above.

Comment
Big Club Hands Again.

With regret here is one more which we did not get right either! Online with the Elite team. Love all East deals. The full deal.

East who might have opened a weak 2 passed and so did South. At the table, West chose 3NT. I do not know what East understood by this. North passed. East after thought bid 4♣ (pass or correct). I hope readers may have noticed that for the last couple of weeks I have featured Big Club suit hands. What these have in common is that we have got none right! Now his partner felt he had not described his hand adequately and went to 5♣. this went a rapid two down -100 on the lead.

Let us take advantage of seeing everything. N/S can make 4♠, so the E/W result is not as silly as it looks! 4 by E/W with the 4-0 break must go off two. Have a look at the bidding. What is your agreement on 3NT? My system is that it means a long solid minor 7+ and nothing outside. I do not say this is right, that is up to you. Clearly East was far from clear, again my action would be to pass and like McCawber hope something turns up. A ♠ lead from North is highly likely and presents 9 tricks. West repeated the error feeling he had not described his hand (true) he bid again after the preempt. The first bid you make is crucial. Get it wrong and you are playing guilt stricken catch up. I think all three hands should be studied and the lessons taken on board.

 I repeat what does an opening 3NT show?

Comment
An Unusual Transfer Sequence.

This was the last Board in Monday’s Reform game. I played with Marina (Strong and 5) and as luck would have drew Michael B and Emma. We will consider Marina’s problem first. B18 East Deals.

Marina opened with minimum1NT and got the transfer response of 2H. 2S and now 3S from P. what does this mean? I think that it is not 100% forcing. The normal bid here is 3NT offering the choice of games. It must be saying I do not like 3NT, but why? It can only be that he does not want to play NT as he has long weak Spades and borderline values. East is borderline also and not keen on S. Oh for AXX! Over to you, decide before you expose the complete hand.  Show all

Marina decided after thought to stick to the old principle and say 3NT “I do not like S”. The JD was led and when the Q won, she had two more entries. AS felled the Q (better to be lucky than good) and another established the suit. +430. A few interesting points here. Always ask P opinion before you rush to game. Note again the devalued Q. KQX so much more powerful. On the result sheet 5 pairs went off in 3S. AD and two ruffs AC and KS. 3 more in H -1. Somebody made 4S and one pair got a good score in just 2S. We were 100% on our own in 3NT +1.

Comment
Where There is Twelve There is Thirteen.

There is an adage, which says when bidding slams that if in the bidding you can count 12 tricks there must be one more somewhere. This was tested in our recent team of 8 v Cumberland.

At three tables slam was bid in NT or hearts. At the fourth Cumberland East went to 7H I do not know the bidding. South leads a standard trump to the 2 and you win the ten, You, have 6H, 2S 1D and 3C. That adds to 12. Where is the 13th? Well clubs could break 3-3 but would I give you the hand? The QS could be right,  and so could the KD. How do we combine our chances? Nobody wants to take an early finesse in 7. We draw trumps in three rounds. North throws 4,5D Now let us test the S, AK discard a D, ruff 7S. South follows 2 5 9 and North 3 4 8. It looks like N has the minors. We continue to assume that he has 4C. IF he has the KD as well he can be squeezed, (so could he if he has QS) Cash KQC and South follows twice. Ruff the last S and N shows out. So he has 5D and the odds are now 5-3 that he has the KD. Cash last trump discard 9D and North without hesitation the 10D Your move. Has North bared the KD? Or was that finesse like the QS right all along. Decide before you look at all four hands. +1520 or -100. Show all four    

Comment
Watching a nightmare.

One of the more diverting advantages of Online is that you can for a short period watch your friends. Glass in hand I tapped into Sally & Paul on Sunday last, this was the second hand up. Love all West deals.

Two weeks ago, I wrote “If you want to know how good your suit is look at the fourth card” * The West hand is a real snare and delusion. 19 points and four aces but very weak playing strength. East 12 black cards but again weak suits. What all three have in common is that they are greatly improved opposite as little as XXX. Critical is Dealer’s suit and recognition that you do not want to play in the suit unless P has something as well. Several players jumped in the suit second time misleading their Partners. One player opened 2♣ and could not stop. What, did I see? Dealer opened 1 (could be only 3) and v silent opponents it went after long thought 2♠ (apparently 10 + and at least 5♠).

They were playing Roman Club. I can only tell you what I witnessed. Then 6!!! Paul told me later that knowing this could not be made, there must be something better so no double. I agree. The defence slipped, slightly and this went 3 down. A second top only against 7♣X-3. The hand is difficult, but proper evaluation of playing strength is the key. I suggest 1 – 1♠ – now the tricky rebid. Has P anything in ? so 2. Then 2♠ (minimum do not like your suits). 3NT – 4♣, any help? No! – 4♠.

Finally let me compliment Paul M and Yvonne Rogers two of our less experienced players. They bid: 1 – 1♠ – 3 – 3♠ – 4♠ for the EW top. Common sense prevails.


 * “A crucial raise”. Was anybody listening ?

Comment
A Crucial Raise

We have had a spate of long club suit hands in recent weeks. What they have in common, is that we have got them all wrong. Look at this one from the Dutch Club on Tuesday where I partnered Pascale Hakim in South. The play is easy the bidding not so.

We will see all four hands.*  I opened 1C and with silent opponents drew a 1H response. My hand is attractive, the club suit has length but no intermediates. Playing in NT the suit would block opposite J109. If you want to know how strong your suit is look at the fourth card. I could support to 2H but P may have only four and just one honour. I decided to underbid with 2C. Pascale with an opening bid herself was fishing for game, she chose 3C (key bid). This says                 “I have at least 3C not minimum looking for game” She hoped that I would now bid 3D and she could go 3NT. Back to me, and a major revalue of my hand. I have 7 club tricks, two first round controls, and a single S. If partner has an Ace (or two) we have, Slam chances. I tried 4NT (RKCB) – 5D one ace and now 6C. East hopeful of a trump trick began with two rounds of Spades. I drew trumps and claimed. For a complete top.

As can be seen a D lead makes life a bit more difficult, so there is a case for doubling the 5D response. But H distribution means that a desperation double finesse brings the slam home. Most people went to 3NT but despite the club block could only be defeated on a D lead. 

*I have cheated. On the actual hand S held J102 but this makes a nice point.

Comment
Food for thought

Overvaluing the Queen

One of the things that I have noticed playing on- line is the major fault that so many players have with valuing their hand. The stand- out error is overvaluing the Q. Why should this be? One reason is the Milton Work Count, 4-3-2-1 for AKQJ.

In the 30’s Austria had a world beating team Captained by the martinet Dr Paul Stern. He invented and they played the Vienna system. Essentially a big club system not unlike Precision in the 70’s.

The Vienna count however never caught on in Europe or the USA due in part to Goren in fluence “Point Count Bidding” and probably simplicity.

Stern used the Vienna count of 7-5-3-1. Many thought this superior to Milton. Perhaps a look at the percentages may assist the discussion.

A K Q J
Milton 100 75 50 25
Vienna 100 71 43 14

Now look at it another way. Which would you rather have? Four Queens or two Aces. Of course, the answer is the Aces, Secondly the Aces represent first round control of a suit. Put another way, do you believe that two queens are worth an Ace? The Kings you hope for secondary control. So, we conclude that Vienna is in fact the superior method. I do not advocate its use, I counsel devaluing the Q when you look at your hand.

Comment
Failing to reach slam bid

A major weakness in the circle is slam bidding. Minor suits are particularly poor.
Only one pair found the making 6
♣ on Board 27. Playing Acol or Five card majors West opens 1♣  and East responds 1 . Our pair playing five card majors made a non-standard reverse. However, opener now with a solid club suit and seven clear winners will typically bid 3. Now I suspect came the parting of the ways with the lazy bid of 3NT and the obvious twelve tricks cash out when the ♠ J drops.
It costs nothing to bid 3
♠  on the responding hand. This says "I am not minimum, I am not looking for four card major from you, this was denied with 3♣ " So why am I bothering?" Partner must have club support. Now another lazy bid of 3NT would put us back to square one. West must say "I have made a limit bid and described my hand well, but I am not minimum - so 4  costs nothing". Now it's easy, 4NT - 5♣  (3 keycards) 5  (have you got QC? ) 5♠  - yes - 6♣ 

 

Perhaps the last bit was unnecessary, because the 4  Implies solid clubs.
 

But the real lessons are:
Controls are more important than points in suit contracts. Give your partner information - with more information, better decisions can be made.
In the play, only a diamond lead puts Declarer under any pressure.

Comment
Seven Different Results out of Seven !

When you look through a traveller, and there are 7 results on it. You do not expect them all to be different. That, however, was what happened at the Dutch club this week playing with Pascale. South - Pascale dealt and passed and EW only were vulnerable. It is best to see the whole hand.

I was North and this is what I saw at the time. West opened 2H (weak why not, 2S, or pass and wait?) I bid a TO X and East raised to 4H (why not enquire with 2NT?). Some what taken aback and conscious of the vulnerability it came back to me and I decided to go for a sacrifice and bid 4NT. Pascale to my relief read this correctly for minors and bid 5C. Which to my amazement was passed. They began with a Spade and when the third round of the suit was ruffed it was over ruffed in dummy, one round of trumps left enough to cover two losing D.

The results on the sheet were:5C-1, 3NT -1, 5D -3, 2H +3 (yes really) 6C-2, 5S, 5H. A look at all four hands tell us that 6H+ 1430 is cold. Nobody bid or made it! Absolute par is 7Cx -3 EW +500.

Well as someone said “when you have seen one you have not seen them all”     

Comment
Too Clever by Half ?

My online education continues. This one is from the Dutch Club  19 May. My long suffering, partner was Marina. Take the South cards only. East deals & they only are vulnerable. Dealer East opens 1C (could be short) and conscious of the promising 4S you decide to double. Pass - North - 1H and East 3NT!  Your move. When you have decided look at all four hands.

Show All.

Astonishingly all passed. They bungled the defence so East escaped with six down -600. I was totally relaxed (yes, I was East) convinced that a slam in D or S was cold. But examination shows that to be incorrect. The hand was played 7 times twice in 5C-1 3D +2 5D +1 4S +1 6C-2 (no double) the 3NT.

You have, to credit South with genius. Any normal player would double and take the money. But East would now back out to Clubs. What of North? Surely the response to the double is 2C – pick a suit partner? I hoped that a H lead might come and then I have a chance. When partner passes, I know it’s not our board. Fans of the Cincinnati Kid, will remember in the dénouement, The Man when it is pointed out that “he raised on a lousy 3 flush” answered. “it’s about doing the wrong thing at the right time”

Comment
Bidding a Monster.

Big hands particularly those with 8+ suits can be very awkward to bid. Take the South cards and decide on your opening bid (on-line at the Dutch club). EW only Vulnerable. North deals, passes as does East. Show South only

Long ago Culbertson promulgated “the law of symmetry” he argued that one hand was likely to be similar in shape to your own. This does not appear to be the case here, and anyway the theory was totally discredited by the mathematicians. The hand has huge playing strength. Eight solid clubs. No great potential defensively. The two Kings might, or might not, be valuable. What about a pre-empt? If so at what level? The trouble with that is, 3NT played by you might be the answer. Finally, you have just one Ace, so for Slam partner will need two. Ok those are the issues. Your Move. Show full hand

At the table South opened 4C West doubled and East 4H. Now South broke the golden rule. When you have pre-empted - all action is up to partner and bid 5C. The reason being that the 4C does not do the hand justice. True, but that is the point, if you are not prepared to let them play major suit game go to 5C immediately. This was passed out and the defence took the 3 major tricks 5C-1 NS -50. 4H X probably nets +800. How should this go? My view is that the possibility of 3NT must be protected and 1C should be opened. West doubles as before and North 1S is music to your ears. East 2or3H and now you go 3NT and it is your board. Becher’s Brook is not the first fence in the Grand National.

Comment
The Interior Finesse. 15 May 2020

The most difficult hands to play and defend are the part scores, Why? Because the strength is divided between both sides and there are many unknowns. A typical example came up on- line. We see all four hands.

East opened a Weak NT and refused the 2NT game invitation. South lead 3S which ran to the JS. Look first at the D suit in isolation. If the 3D is lead to the 9 and J, N probably continues the Spades, the QS wins as S withholds his KS.  Now if Dec can enter dummy the QD will scoop both K and 10D and establish the suit. The Interior Finesse,* East tries JH and if N ducks simply continues. Now N cannot deny dummy an entry. North does best to take the AH and return another. As planned the QD is lead and North has another difficult play. We, looking at four hands can see he must duck. Let us credit, him with that play. Now cash AS and AD and the remaining H for the contract. Three S, Three H two D.

It is still not over. A club to the K North, cannot duck, wins and plays another. The QC wins and the JC drops for 10 tricks.

Bid up Partner!

Note how the threat of four D tricks affects the play.   

* see answer for reprint

The Interior Finesse - 2 Nov 2018

The Bob &Roz Bowman Bowl was narrowly won by Marina and Terry by just one VP from Gordon Fox and George Donath. Marina is earning the soubriquet “invincible” after her recent MCC Teams triumph.

Terry drew my attention to B15 from the first half.

The full deal was:                     South deals N/S only Vulnerable.

                                     S.QJ1065

                                     H.A982

                  S.K9           D.K10            S.82

                  H.K103       C.Q3              H.J5

                  D.852                                 D.QJ9763

                  C.109742     S.A743           C.A86

                                       H.Q764

                                       D.A4

                                       C.KJ5

Systems are variable here. Playing a 12-14NT S opens 1NT and N needs to find the best game I suggest 2H transfer – 2S – 3H (forcing 5-4) and S goes to the Spade game. The Board was played 15 times 6x4H, 7x4S and twice in 3NT (going off once on a D lead). The Spade game was made three times and the 4H only once.

The normal lead was a minor but twice the JH (more later). With the lead in North (4S) he can see that he has a certain H and C loser so needs to know how many H tricks are required. His first move is the S finesse – loses, now he can only afford one H loser. Draw trumps. With AC KH and his D suit East would probably have poked in 2D so he is most likely to be without KH. The only hope if that is so, is the “interior finesse”. The 2H to the 7H and 10H, win the return and go to the dummy with a trump. Lead QH pinning the JH for one loser.

Not so easy!

Terry got the lead of JH and I chided him for his good luck. But he pointed out that he feared a H ruff if he took a losing trump finesse, and simply played AS and another, well foreseen.

Comment
On – Line with the Cumberland.

Marina (West) and I (East) played at the Cumberland on May 1. It was an interesting experience. 20 boards x 4 per round.  In the second round we were ticked off by the TD. Apparently when you made an artificial bid you had to alert it and answer any questions yourself!* Of course we obeyed, feeling foolish. We then had the TD back again when trying to convince our new opponents of the same house rule. Our last opponents were Terry from Florida and it should have been Howard but his stone age computer had failed and they sent on a SUB.

 The Bridge Gods as always had the last laugh with B20. GameAll. After three passes South opened 2C and explained that this meant 8 playing tricks or 20-22 balanced. Marina with broken suits and nervous at the score bid 2D. North passed and East 2H, after thought 4S -5H then 6C from North passed to South who bid 6S. Take Marina’s cards and find a lead to this weird bidding. Have you decided? 

Show full  hand

The AD was lead and as can be seen only a H lead defeats the contract. What was East playing at with his “brilliant“, psychic 2H? He reasoned that his partner must have a bad 6 card D suit too weak for a pre-empt vulnerable, he has a possible S trick and opener’s suit must be H. Bid the suit, get doubled,  and escape to 3D. Hope this will muddy the waters. Any D raise could be expensive. Can the lead be found without this bid?

*Do not try this after lockdown it will earn you a Red Card.

Comment
Where is the Twelfth?

My On - line education continues. With the Elite team Paul, Sally, Michael, David, I have been a coach. My computer coach is Paul. We use the StarLeaf App so we can see all five, and talk. I am a Kibitzer and use the chat key to comment. I see all 4 hands, they of course do not. I make less mistakes!
B6: Look at it as a Declarer problem. Show EW only.

 

East opened 2NT and the bidding continued 3C (Stayman) – 3H – 3S (choice of games) – 4H (must be 5) - 4NT (RKCB) 5C (0 or3 keys) - 6H. After a little thought the JS was lead. You are in the hot seat how do you play it?

You have 5H trumps (no chance if they are 4-1), 3S, 2C, and at least 1D, you need one more. The club finesse is an obvious option, would I have given you the hand if it was the answer? Maybe! On the bidding a D lead is suggested but not made, S probably has the AD. If you cash the Spade early what do you throw on the third round? Ok win the QS and immediately lead 5D if the K loses it is hopeless. This collects the 3 & 2. Draw trumps and S drops the J on the third round and N 4S. AC begets low cards.  Over to A & KS North 4D. The AD is marked in S, as is the 4th S so your 8D is useless. Crossroads, last opportunity for the C finesse, but is there another option? Your move.

If South has the Qxx C and bares his AD he can be thrown in to lead into the KJ. But for that to happen he must be stripped of exit cards.  Ruff last S and play last trump. South throws 10D suggesting a bare AD . Lead QD and its over. Show full hand

There is one more twist, South does best to discard a C the 10D gives too much away. What actually happened? On the D lead South inexplicably took the ACE and Dec claimed. When I wrote this first, later a second line of play occurred to me. JS lead as before QS wins and Dec lead QD. South must win and probably continues with 10S. Return to East cashing 5H throwing two C from Dummy, and South is squeezed in the black suits.

Comment
The Two Game Swing. On – Line.

At the invitation of Pascale, I joined Nicole’s Thursday tournament. Our inexperience of both method and partnership showed.

This board made the day for me. B11 Love All. S deals. See, Pascale’s hand and examine her decisions.

South opened 1C (4 card majors) and West doubled. Pascale felt they must have the majors so raised simply to 3C - 3H and S – 4C (no defence or extras suggests a sacrifice) – 4H and now she decided on 5C (could not be expensive). East after thought 5H. South passed in tempo and North has the key decision. Your bid? Decide before you read on. Partners pass is forcing – Double or bid on. He says he has not got much defence, but he did open the bidding and bid again, did not pre-empt, so he does not have rubbish. The AS decided her X. the KC was lead.    Show all   

Declarer’s best play is to ruff the opening lead and play a S off dummy. Unless North now goes in with AS and switches to a D the contract is cold. This play was not found, but +100 to N/S was worth only 25%. As can be seen the winning bid is 6C which makes on a D guess*. Sally and Paul did encounter 6C, they doubled, no matter. The slam is a cold bottom anyway. Pauli and Kay were the only others who went to 5H. Everyone else played in 5C making 12 tricks some doubled.

Oh! by the way I too would have doubled 5H as North.

*Playing in 6C Draw trumps and play three rounds of S. East shows out and you know West is 6-5 should now guess right.

Comment
More Bridge On Line II

Later this:

South opened 1H and provoked 2S and it continued 3H – 3S – 4C -(tell P what he does not know)– 4S. But North did not recognise the double fit and passed. On the H lead Declarer had to lose to AH and three minor suit tricks - one down but dirt cheap against the cold 5C.  

Comment
More Bridge On Line.

I declined early invites to play on- line. However, with guidance from Paul F and Michael B plus David M I have now played three times, enjoyed it, and improved. We use the StarLeaf app so we can see each other and talk. In the last session I spent most of the time passing. Then out of the blue, came this. We will see both hands.

I just finished counting my 24 points when Paul opened 1C. I bid an old- fashioned game force 2D, and the response was 2S. On our way! 3H (cue and suit) 4C (key bid, he must be 4-6) 4NT - 5S (two keys and QC) -7NT. I got a D lead when the clubs broke at worst 4-1, I claimed 16 tricks. Two babies could bid it. Still fun, first GS on-line!

Comment
On - line first impressions.

I have now played twice on -line with Michael, Paul F, and David M. Reluctant at first, I have thoroughly enjoyed it and would recommend it to circle members. The First time I played badly, confusion with wrong keys, and more seriously trouble remembering the cards played which I have to visualise in a different way contributed. Patient opponents and partner helped. Anyway, have a go.    

“How Could I Tell?”

My recent column of 13 March “Feeling Foolish” seems to have rung a bell with some members. It should! We have all been there. At the risk of being a plagiarist I refer to the chapter of “The Expert Game”. The key point I was trying to make, is that partnership respect & confidence is essential. An example: Partner makes a bad lead, which appears to help Declarer. Do you curse them? Or do you say, “it’s a lousy lead – there must be a good reason why”. More often than not it is a singleton.

  Reese first example is:

South who plays 4S, supported his partners H, on the way. The 5C was lead to the AC and the JC drops. East switched to KD and continued with 7D to the AD. Declarer dropped 6D and 8D. West worried that the JC was a false card and tried to cash KC and the contract went home. The point here is, if the D play is genuine the East would know this. South in the bidding has shown at least nine major suit cards. It would then be his duty with KQ10xx to cash the QD first. Ask yourself “what does P know that I do not” and judge accordingly. Today I doubt that many players would get this wrong. Many players play Ace for attitude King for count. The 2D would show 3 D cards and the QD would be automatic. Are you and your partner clear on signals?

Comment
Bridge On Line. Never Mind the Virus.

How do you beat the virus? You go on - line. Details on the website. A small coterie made a start the other day. I am indebted to Paul and Sally for sending me B 1. North deals at Love All.

North opened 1H, East overcalled 2D and South passed. West now bid 3S (fit jump) North passed but East’s 3NT bid was passed back to him he doubled, passed out and you South are on lead. Make your decision before reading on.

What does the double mean? Had he just passed you would have lead his suit. No to H lead. The bidding tells us that with the overcall and the fit they must have at least 6 D tricks, with the bidding they must have expected a H lead so surely a tenace holding say – AQ. There must be a top spade in dummy, so we rapidly count 9 tricks. A club now stands out. Show whole hand.

As can be seen, 5D makes, and on a H lead so does 5NT. What did happen? The bidding is what took place but there was no double. Nicole organises these games, have a look on the website. Published early as a plug for these games.  

Comment
The Squeamish Look Away Now!

The Recent “Candia” column has provoked enquiries on the UNT, usually used as an overcall e.g 1S – 2NT shows both minor suits. My partner and I had a misunderstanding in a match recently. This was the full deal. West deals and N/S only are vulnerable. 

West opened 3D, alerted and explains a transfer pre-empt in H. North (AJS) passed and the 3H response was passed back to North. Frankly I find these methods ridiculous. Here we are at the 4 level and they know nothing about the East hand. A simple 4H probably scoops the pot. North now felt that his side might be being swindled. He wanted to play in a minor but which one? He bid 3NT. Surely after the bidding this could not be to play? All passed, no rescuing X. Had one been made would a rescue XX have been left in as well? South said afterwards that he thought 3NT meant a H stop and a long minor. Hardly logical with KQH in hand. 

 North got the H lead, and somewhat rattled, revoked in Hearts, and blocked the Club suit. This added to down 6 (not the minus 2) and      – 600 N/S. The swing was held down by our partners who bid and made 4H.

  I think we can agree however, that this was not my finest hour.        

Comment
The Siege of Candia – today Heraklion.

This lasted 21 years, the longest in history. Well the siege of Boris will not last that long? The Morgan league team assembled for the last hurrah on 16 March. Marina had scraped together a foursome and I found myself playing with two French women and an Italian. They asked me to explain the English obsession with toilet paper – as if I knew!

The game had the last word. Up 4IMPs on ICL the fireworks took place after the break. Board 18 The whole hand. East Deals N/S Vul.

Yes! Really.

 R1. Dealer opened 4H and South has the first key decision. The bid is 4NT – both minors; but Marina was concerned that I might misread this and so bid 5C. This made it worse for me as my QC now looks a great card, and I am slam minded. I went 5S and all passed. East lead a disastrous (for the defence) AH. This had two effects, it enabled me to utilise the 9S and prevented me from taking the losing trump finesse. I ruffed, crossed to QC and to AK trumps. Leaving the QS at large I lead another Club. East can do nothing, if he ruffs, I have the winning clubs and the AD entry. If he does not, I win the AC ruff a club and give up QS. In R2 they played in 5C. this should lose 2D and a C but did not NS +600. We ran out winners by +38.

The hand is worth a close look. The KD lead knocking out a crucial entry defeats 5S. The best contract surprisingly is 5D which makes. In turn this means that absolute par is 5Hx –2 giving NS +300. There is a case for West taking a view. At the vulnerability 5H cannot be expensive and maybe should go there immediately. This may induce an overbid by NS, and a profitable X. 

Comment
Failure to Cash Out – Feeling Foolish.

There are endless ways to make you feel foolish at this game, one of the worst is when you do not cash your setting tricks and Declarer sails home.

This one arose in the MCC match. You will have the advantage of seeing all four hands.

After two passes West opened 4D all pass. In these situations, the bid is designed to shut out opposing majors, so N began with 8S and Dummy played low. Now what is this lead? 8x. x8xx or x8x after thought South fearing single Q took the AS. On the same reasoning knowing the S suit will give discards, he switches to 2H to the 10H and the AH. Unsure of his next move N cashes AC to the 5C, 7C, and 2C. Encouraged by this he plays another C and Declarer ruffs, draws trumps and the 10H goes away on the Spades for his contract.

Who is to blame? 

What you do not do, is look for scapegoats. This destroys partnership amity and must be avoided. Terence Reese in his brilliant “The Expert Game“,  devotes a chapter “could I tell?” to this subject. North first. He does best to lead a trump which clarifies the suit for the defence. The, S lead is hardly wrong. People debate what to lead from the 10 but the 8S is ambiguous. When the 2H comes from partner it shows four but who has the KH? West played 10 H without hesitation if he had KH he must have considered playing it. If Partner had KQH he would have led KH. Lastly when he plays AC the 2C appears, Declarer with any additional cards would surely drop one to conceal his holding. So 2C is single and he should revert to H.

So, is it all the fault of North? Absolutely not. If South ducks the first S the problem does not arise. When he wins and now knows the danger of the S suit, he realises that it is a cash out hand and must clarify this for his Partner. Declarer cannot have the AH so he leads KING of H and continues. North now will not go wrong.

I commend this hand to Circle members. Talk with your partner about leads and signals. Console yourselves with the thought that two experienced players got this one wrong.

Comment
So Often a Crucial Board. No 13.

It is usually the board that begins the second half of the match, North deals and it is always Game All. In a league match North opened 2C – game force – opponents silent, this was the hand.

I know that I go on about the Circle’s Slam weakness, but Slams decide matches. This was no exception. When you use an all purpose 2C, it is important to clarify for your partner what hand type you have as early as you can. When responding to a big hand Partner expects you to be weak, so try to tell him as quickly as possible - how weak. With these points in mind follow this bidding.

South – 2D (relay or weakness, 2S would promise a better suit) – 2NT (balanced 23-25 points) - 3H (transfer for S, missing the top honours, must be six) -3S (as requested) - 4H ( while not good Spades I am close to a positive, have AH). Tell Partner what he does not know! Wow! that helps! I have limited my hand and like his Spades, - 5C – OK that helps too, we need very few cards to be held for Slam – 6S. East’s best lead is JH through the cue bid. If dummy has the QH, put Declarer under pressure, he will hate an early finesse. The play on JH lead. Win AH, cash AKS discovering the break, cross to 10D and draw third trump. Now cash D, praying for West to have three, and discard the 3H. At the table a C was lead, so much easier! In R2 the bidding was the same except that South did not bid 4H and simply took the game. 13imps to N/S   

Comment
Have you ever been dealt a one loser hand?

Here is another hand from RAC Morgan v Portland in the Devonshire Cup.

West the dealer passes as does North and while you are contemplating your 2C opener East opens 1S. You decide on a bid and pick up the stop card, before you put it down, West fingers the top cards in his bidding box. So West is about to raise or bid, over the opener. Partner must have Zero points. On this basis you decide to bid 6H, and you point out to E/W that illegal info has been transmitted. West doubles, all pass. The 3C is lead Show full hand to the 9 QC and AC. You bang out the trumps losing to JH and claim. The bidding was the same at four tables in play on the night. Everybody, except this table went down +100 EW. What on earth possessed West NOT to lead AS but a Club? The only card to give the slam. I would not double. At the vulnerability you gain 50 points and may give valuable information to Declarer.

Have you ever been dealt a one loser hand? I have now. 

Comment
Unlikely Finesse.

I got roped in to RAC Morgan for the Quarter final of the Devonshire Cup. Opponents were the Portland club – rubber bridge players - and past winners. I love this, unique event but only play these days as a Sub when it does not clash with other engagements. Up by +720 at the half we tackled their best pair at the14 board change. It always throws up extraordinary situations and hands. In this half I held good 8card suits three times! Our opponents on the fourth occasionwhen I put the STOP card down said, “what this time?” To much laughter I put the 2C card down. This was the hand.

After 2C the response 2D (relay or negative) – 2S (good suit at least 5) – 3D (positive denied, 5 cards, low values) – 3NT (24/25 balanced) passed out. In room 2 they had played in 6D – hopeless of course - so I needed to make the game. I got 9C lead, the 10 allowed to win. I have avoided the H lead and can count 8 top tricks. If I established the QD I could not get back to cash it. A 4-3 Spade split is 62% so I lead the 8S from dummy and there was an audible gasp all round when I let it run and lost to the 10S. Another club, I cashed the S, the JS fell, game made. Marina pointed out on the way home East was caught dozing. He must cover the 8S

Can 3NT always be made? Deep finesse says yes, but I will leave you all to work out the many variations. We won in the end.

Comment
Too risky to bid or too risky not to?

The weak NT can be a difficult weapon. If the vulnerability is Red v Green and you are vulnerable, opening as dealer on 12-14 can incur a nasty penalty. If they open a W NT – non vul – you are exposed. At pairs it is easier to bid, not least because a bottom is only that. At teams bidding may land a match losing penalty.

Look, initially at just the South hand which came up in a team game.

Partner passes, and East opens a 12-14 NT. Your bid? You have 14 points theoretically enough to X, but you have no attractive lead, if for example they own a cashing D suit this is a disaster if left in. If you bid, the high cards are surely well placed so should help. There are various defensive systems if agreed but partner would expect at least one 5 card suit. Take, for instance Landy showing both majors? You decide and then look at the full deal. Show all.

As you can see, 4H works a treat. At one table S passed and West - 2s (transfer to C) this drew 3C as required. What now? What would X mean? At the vulnerability assuming a bad six card club suit on your left, a penalty is hardly attractive. Moreover West is still unlimited, there are dangers still. What do I think? At pairs I would use Landy for majors, at teams too risky to come in. But late on needing points? As can be seen 3C-1 is scant reward for a cold game. I urge partnerships to discuss the hand and agree defensive measures. As always at this game there are no absolute answers.

Comment
Two Suited Overcalls.

Here is another hand from the “match that never was” reported on last week on which the bidding provoked a lively discussion between all four of us. We will look at the whole hand. Dealer S N/S Vul.

East/West first. S passed and 1D was opened (strong NT, 5 card majors, better minor) and North overcalled 1S, East anxious to leave the many possibilities open – 2C. South conscious of the adverse vulnerability and a 10 loser hand passed to – 2D – 2S – 3D. Isabelle in the French style considered this forcing and tried 3H, (but note that change JS for QX and a right sided 3NT can now be bid by West) . East was obliged to go 4D, and this lost 2C, 1H, and 1S for +50 N/S. In the discussion E/W agreed that the 3D was merely competitive after the interference.

We then looked at the four hands and realised 4S was cold for N/S losing one Club, AS, AD. So a – 50 was a great result! One of our number felt it was impossible to bid the game. I for one did not agree. We can all see that repeated S bids does not begin to do justice to the 4 loser hand. Andrew Robson preaches “6-5 come alive”. If a TOX is used S will come in with 2H over 2C and after a pass -  North - 2S then 3D and South scrapes up 3S. It is still very difficult for N to bid the game.

So what is the solution? North needs to have in their system (they did not) a two suited overcall convention such as Michaels Or Ghestem. Readers not familiar with these should use Google. Space does not permit me to elaborate here. However 2D by North  over the opener in Michaels shows both majors. Only in Ghestem would it show S and a minor. Partnerships should discuss these conventions.

Not so easy.   

 

Comment
Where are the High Cards? Discovery

RAC Morgan: Marina, Paul W, Isabelle and me, played a KO match on Tuesday. Unfortunately, one of their side failed to surface and they forfeited. We took the prepared boards and Isabelle and I practised our inexperienced bidding. B16 threw up this: West deals and is vulnerable. 

The Bidding – West passes and North opens 2H (weak). EW silent it continues – 2NT (Ogust) describe your hand) – 3H (max points, poor suit) South bid the game. East paused to consider his lead and started with KD. North began to plan. West does not have an opening bid and East has declined to interfere. The normal lead on this bidding is either trump or a S but he has lead KD – must show QD. There are plenty of tricks if the cards lie right. Entries to dummy are precious so we take AD. Is the AS in W? Let us find out. But 2S to the K loses to 8S, and AS. He cashes the QS and continues with QD, this time W drops JD and you ruff. OK you have a lot of information – your move. Decide before exposing the full hand. Show All

East has shown up with 11 points and may have QC as well if he had the KH as well (14 points) he must have considered a TO X over 2H. If the trumps are 3-1 a trick must be lost in any event. Once you have got that far a trump to the AH stands out. 

What are the things to remember here?

  • When you are trying to discover the opposing cards and have choice of suits to play, start with the one where you have no choice. Spades not H or C.
  • When your Partner is known to be weak, as here do not tell Declarer how strong you are. Note the QS is the concluding evidence and it should not be cashed.
  • Delay any crucial decision (i.e trumps) for as long as you can to maximise the information. Assemble all the clues as you go.

What did happen? Declare ruffed a second D and took the H finesse a third D was overruffed and they waited for two S tricks.

Comment
The Frustrations of Deep Finesse.

Do you, like me, go through the hands after the session? I do, but the sheets tell you what the above programme would achieve. It can be a humbling experience. I played this hand in 6C recently and made it when West clung to her KH and unguarded the QD. I thus made 5C 3D 2S and a ruff, and AH. I looked at DF who told me that I should make 13 tricks! The hand was: Love all East deals.

As North I got the lead of JC. I won the KC cashed AS and returned to the QC my plan had been to ruff a S and a H. but when the trumps showed 3-1 I realised that I had to surrender a H and East would come in to play a third trump round. This left me with what you can see is a losing option of the D finesse. I got away with it, four others did not. In tranquillity I realised that the hand is a dummy reversal. Draw trumps then AKD ruff a D over to the AS and ruff another. Then KS ruff a S cash the last D and give H. but that is only 12 tricks. 

Try again, three rounds of Clubs ending in Dummy. Now JD, West must cover win and go back to KD and ruff out the 9D. Now you have 4D, 5C, 2S and a ruff plus the AH.

Oh I wish I could see all the hands like Deep Finesse!

Comment
Restricted Choice.

Back in the sixties much debate surrounded the principle of Restricted Choice. Most of you I am sure know of it. For those not familiar with it: the classic position is. Declarer holds S. A109xx opposite K872. If the suit divides evenly he has 5 tricks. However, when he first plays 2S from dummy the JS appears and he wins AS. On the second round a low card is played on the left and he has to decide. Finesse or drop? The Principle says, if the JS is single then it is forced, but if he held QJ he might have played Q. With only J he had no choice so the finesse is odds on. This principle however has wider implications.

On 9 Jan B9 caught my eye (I did not play). After the above let us just take look at the whole hand. Dealer E and only vul.

The Bd was played 7 times and four pairs bid the good 6H but two of them went down. Using old Acol a possible sequence is. 2NT (20-22 upgrade for the 3 aces and 5 suit) – 3C (stayman) – 3H - 4NT – (RKCB) – 5D (1 or 4 keys) – 6H. South leads the KC – best lead and Dec wins. If the trumps divide he has 4S – 5H – 2D and one C. It all depends on the trumps. The 5H draws the 10H and the AH wins, another H to the 6H, and its decision time. The point is that South would not play 10H unless forced and could indeed have started with Q10H but RC says finesse!

Comment
The Oldies.

Due to bad planning I have yet to play at Pall Mall in 2020. Worse the site has not printed the hands – only the travellers. I am short of material. It gives me an excuse to look at another “Golden Oldie”. I have chosen a hand played by the great Helen Sobel in 1948. It requires no squeeze or end play- merely play the cards at the right time, in the right order. Let us look at the NS cards only at first.

South dealt at GA and opened 1H with silent opponents it proceeded -2H – 2S* - 3H - 4H all pass. The QC is lead – plan the play. There are 10 tricks 5H, 2D, 2C and the AS. We cash AH and on the QH West discards 3D. Over to you?

Dummy is weak and short of entries. The D finesse is an illusion, if you lead from Dummy and it wins you are no better off since you must unblock the AD and draw trumps before starting on Clubs. But supposing it loses? It seems West is long in D so probably holds the KD. If you pay AD- 10D there is a danger of an overruff and still two C to lose. There is a play which caters for all these possibilities, the 10D.Time to look at all the hands (show full hand). West wins and finds the S switch (the killing opening lead) but now Declarer has control, AS, AD draw the last trump. and discard 4S on QD, give up two club tricks. 

*When declarer makes a trial bid and in receipt of a negative response goes on anyway. Be suspicious of the trial bid it may be psychic designed to inhibit a lead as here. Point to remember.

Comment
Do We Go One More?

I played this over the Christmas break. Some useful lessons to be relearned! Love all. South deals. Look at my hand, West only at first.

Dealer opened 1H. Obviously I want to pre-empt, but to what level? The rule here is “would you let them play 4H?” Once you answer that question “No” then you bid 4S immediately. You should have 8 tricks. After the compulsory pauses N – 5H and partner – X. You have bid your hand, so this is passed out and you are on lead. What is it, and why? Decide before looking at all four hands. Show all four.

Opponents have bid freely to the 5 level so they must be short in the S suit. You would be grateful for one S trick but there will not be two for sure. Could we get P on lead to give me C ruff? Once this idea takes root, the 2S jumps out. Did you find it – well done if you did. The QS wins and 2S is an obvious McKenny for a club ruff. N/S lose to KD eventually for -300. What happened? We were playing Teams so partner, went one more apologising for removing my chance to shine! I pointed out that if the S break 2-0 then he would be right to bid on (we lost 3 red tricks). Note also that absolute par on the hand is E/W +100 in 5CX the suit never mentioned. Another  deadly two game swing hand

Comment
Something to think about over Christmas and New Year.

I looked at my old columns and some themes seem to crop up regularly. 

  1. The Circle’s Slam bidding is weak. The primary fault lies in the question “how good is my hand?”
  2. This relates to another theme – the power of Aces.

I did not play on 19th December but B15 caught my eye. South deals and passes and NS only vulnerable. 

Let us see the whole hand.

Astonishingly the board was played 8 times, and all played in 3NT, making either 12 or 13 tricks. This means that nobody made a slam try! The breaks are all even and with good guessing 13 tricks are there. Opponents are silent and West to bid. He has 22 points but four Aces and one King. It is worth a game force 2C, it should make game opposite nothing. Over to responder, there is a tendency today to bid 2D – describe your hand - regardless. This is a trap, you are now at the 3 level and advanced no information on your hand. You have 10 points importantly three Ks which means your partner must have Aces. When did that last happen over 2C? You bid 2NT (balanced, positive 8-11) now Opener simply bids 4NT – quantitative – how good are you? Top end - 6NT.  They have just two Js and one Q between them.

The power of Aces and Kings. Note also that the East hand with its major tenaces is much more difficult to lead into. In the play, the best defensive lead is a club – from either hand. This means in effect you must take the S finesse into North first. Why? Because if it loses, he will establish the suit. Now you must finesse into South for the QH. 

Comment
Another Battle with Hurlingham.

We seem in permanent opposition to the Hurlingham with RAC Morgan lately in league and knockouts. We met again 16 December. One of the features of these contests is that we turn over a lot of Imps, this does not reflect huge credit to either side! This one no exception, 133. This time RAC won easily. Up 50- 17 at the half this, for us was the first of the second set. B 19 South deals and only EW vulnerable

Let us go first to R1 with Andrew & Marina West & East. North opened 1S after two passes and 2D was overcalled – 2S - & West – 3S (good raise to 4D) and 4S concluded the auction. KD lead and another ruffed. 2H to the JH, KH, AH, suit returned, and a ruff secured defeat plus a loss of a club for two down +100 to RAC.  Well played.

Room 2 Isabelle N and Tony South. West opened a 12-14 NT (not me, dealer vulnerable) We were an unfamiliar partnership and had just agreed a Landy 2C for majors – 2C. Then - 2D and I with some support for both majors scraped up - 2H – 3D and - 4H. After long thought – X. AD and another as before ruffed with 2H and 3H continued. This time East declined to split her honours and the 10H lost to the AH. West had little option but a club. Declarer took in dummy, cashed KH, left the QH at large and played S when East ruffed eventually South has 10 tricks 4S, 2C, a D ruff and three trumps in hand when the club is discarded.  Plus 590 RAC and 12 Imps.

The most interesting point on this hand for me, is the superiority of the weaker 4-4 H fit to the 5-4 S fit. Note how the trump intermediates are crucial and how the 9632 anchors the attack 

Comment
One more from the Sim Pairs November 14.

Here is another hand from this disappointing event. As I have said the cards were very N/S biased. Here is a hand that was not. B20 Game All. West (you) deals and opens a dubious 1D.  Show West hand only. 

With some reservations (three Q and weak defensive tricks) you decide to open 1D – P – 1S and South comes in with an immediate 4H. Ouch! at the vulnerability S must have a solid 8 tricks and no great defence. You decide to bid 4S, it continues – P (I think he should go 5H) -  P and South after thought goes one more – 5H – you have bid your hand, probably overbid, leave this decision to Partner – the unknown hand. He doubles and you are on lead? Make your decision before you look at all four hands. Show all four

You can see if you lead AS the contract is unbeatable. Declarer takes his 8 trumps and cannot be prevented from winning the KS and ruffing two more. 4S makes only QC is certain to defeat 5HX.

Comment
Hand 10

The frequency of a grand slam is rare – less than 1 in a hundred. Small slams occur with comparative abundance. In a normal evening of duplicate bridge you would expect at least one per session and every other session two. Amazingly out of the 27 boards in play in this year’s Centenary cup there were no less than 5 slams one of which (hand 10) qualified for grand status. Yet only one pair found their way to bidding it and in doing so netted the 10 imps for their team. Andrew Kisiel rarely missus the opportunity to go for the max and so it was in this case.

When East opens, west needs to invent a bid and 2♣ allows east to show 16+ and a 4 card suit. From West's point of view with 9 cards now accounted for, it is now a question of the construction of the black suits. 2♠ is 4th suit forcing and now 2NT by East eith shows Kx or QJx. If the holding is Kx you can count 13 tricks and Blackwood provides the answers.

 

 

 

Comment
Dodds cup report

Murder in the Red Barn

It is the first round of the Dodds Cup – Business Houses league KO. We are the holders and play a 3rd Division Team. At the half we are +30 Imps so our aim is to stay out of trouble. Opponents do not give up and with two boards to play are dealt:

      Dealer      S.AQ103                      S.K72

                       H.AQ62.                       H.7

                       D.93                              D.AK10762

                       C.KQ7                           C.852  

They bid 1S – 2D – 3NT- 6S clearly the Nelson bidding system “go right at em”. N leads the AC and another. Declarer draws trumps in three rounds, and plays diamonds dropping N doubleton QJ and claims. That was a loss of 10 imps (not bid in room 2!) and we scramble home by just 6 imps.

Better to be lucky than good!

 

 

Comment
Unblocking the Unblock.

When you have been playing this extraordinary game for as long as I have (60+ years) it is unusual to encounter something you have never seen before. The moment you say that, up pops a hand to belie your experience. West deals and passes as do you (North).

East opens 1D and your side is silent as it continues. 1S – 3C (game force) – 3H (4th suit F) – 3NT. Partner hearing the H weakness begins with JH which you duck to the QH. Declarer thinks, continues with 2D to the 9, 10 and your J. Your move?  Make your decision before you bring up the full hand. Show all.

Your first instinct is to cash your AH in the hope of catching KQ on the left. But for that to occur Partner must have J10X and will need to unblock his 10H. Then you notice the 9H in dummy which you both would establish! Oh dear! Then the penny drops, underlead your AH and pray that Dec cannot run 9 tricks. Partner must have AC to lead to your three winning H. 

At pairs a very difficult defence.

But is that all? Declarer might take a different line. Giving an early D exposes him to the loss of three H, AC and a D. So win the H and cash AQS and finesse 10C. Take KS (the J might drop) - exit with QC. When S wins Declarer has 8 tricks and the same dilemma confronts the defence but they should now prevail.  

Comment
Better To Be Lucky Than Good!

Teams night last Thursday threw up this hand. Let us see the whole hand. East deals and his side only vulnerable.

Dealer opened 1 and South a weak jump overcall to 2♠. West 3NT (13-15) and East overbid immediately with 6NT! North lead his partners suit and the A♠ was taken and 10♠ to Q♠. Declarer looked at the inadequate dummy and counted only 10 top tricks. Any ideas? To make a squeeze work we need three tricks. Oh well, “never up never in” as they say in Golf! Cash the J♠ and K and cross to Q and cash A Hallelujah! The Q drops. Now we know South must retain the ♠ and North guards the .

The end position with the lead in dummy at trick 7 with two to come is:

   
  1097  
   
  QJ5  
4  
  J8
109   A8
K76   A8
  865  
   
   
  1092  

The J comes next and South discards a ♠ and West 9, North follows but when the two are played South has to throw a ♣ and North has to hold the , a perfect double squeeze.

The bidding is not good. East is only worth an invitational 4NT which West would pass. Better still is 4 leading to the cold 6 – no squeeze needed. However, the Q♣ lead and continuation when the A♠ is knocked out ruins the ending in 6NT.

Comment
Raise Only Non Forcing (RONF)

Most South's will open a weak 2 in 's. If South passes it is difficult to see how East West will avoid a large penalty after P-P-1♠-1-P-P-X. So assuming that weak 2s are in play, what do think the best sequence is to find the optimum contract. Submitted entries will be added below.

The Chairman writes - Ian Payn opened 2H and after thought I bid 3D (forcing) Ian after long thought bid 4D and I went 5D Roy Ham brilliantly led 2D on any other lead it is cold! If IP had bid 3H I would have punted 3NT or would I – yes I think so. That said I do not quarrel with 4D and consider myself very unlucky to have run into that lead.

Bob Bowman bid 3D and Sister Beatrice passed! and as a  result they landed on their feet. Personally I think 3D has to be forcing and it’s a question of how much value South gives to the QD which as it turns out is gold dust.  The other route is for North to bid 2NT (OGUST) and the way I pay it is 01123 which relates to the number of honours in the trump suit. So in this particular case it would elicit a 3D response (minimum with one heart honour) and probably the one call that North doesn’t want to hear, as this means there is precious little outside the hear suit. North now has to choose between 3S, 3NT and whatever he bids now I can’t see South bidding again, so for this reason 3D seems to be a better bid, and on reflection I think you should reserve OGUST for when one of the possible contracts is in the suit opened. If you agree with that logic and accept that a new suit is unconditionally forcing, then there is a negative inference that North is looking for an alternative contract to hearts, and as 3NT is one of them the Queen of diamonds starts to stand out as a very important card. Dominic

 

Comment
What is an Opening Bid?

On 14 November, we staged a Simultaneous Pairs for the Children in Need Charity. The hands were entertaining as always, but frustrating for those who, like us sat East/West. The heavy N/S bias should have been rectified by the organisers. The West hand averaged 7.34 points overall! Andrew was annoyed with me on B8 – rightly. Let us look at the whole hand.

West deals Love All.

In recent weeks I have been in correspondence with Circle members on the question, “what is an opening bid?” I failed to take my own advice, and opened 1♣ – five card majors, strong NT, could be short. The hand has 12 points BUT has not got two defensive tricks, no quick tricks, the big points are in the short suits and all the intermediates are weak. In short, the bid is pass. Ringing in my ears was the adage “cannot pass 12 points at pairs”

After the 1♣, North bid only 1♠ (no weak jump) and Andrew the obvious 2. Personally, I would have scraped up 2♠ with South but cannot quarrel with the pass. Now my error comes to light. What do I rebid over the forcing 2? 2? forcing for one round the values are not there. 3♣ you must be joking! So I passed the forcing bid, hoping that North would bid again. No such luck and Andrew, irritated to play the hand, out of game with 11 easy tricks. In fact, it was not that costly as minor suit games are always difficult to reach and we escaped with an average.

North East South West
      1♣
1♠ 2 pass pass

I learnt my own lesson do not open without a safe rebid.

Comment
Curious Results at the Ros & Bob Bowman Pairs.

I did not play this year [in the Bowman cup]. This year it was won by Gitte Hecht × Johnson our occasional TD. Board 20 caught my eye. West deals. Game All.

After West’s pass, North typically opened 1♣ and East probably, simply, bids 5 and plays there. South usually leads his partners suit. The Board was played 11 times (once X) and six pairs bid this way sometimes +1. On two of those occasions the 4♠ was lead, and one time they had doubled. But each time the ruff was not taken. I suspect North tried to cash A♣ immediately. The rule of 11 tells North that Declarer has three cards higher than the 4♠ when Declarer drops the 10 logic says that it must be KJ10 or QJ10. If Partner had KQ♠ he would have lead the K, so the most likely is Kxxx.

Another North opened a Weak NT and was allowed to play there – incredibly – undoubled. West should throw all his cards except on the cashing . When the continuation is A and another, West by then knows they have missed a cold 5 and should chance the J for 13 tricks, +700 and all the MPs, but did not! Three pairs stopped in below game for a poor score. We will forget the 3♠ contract.

Comment
Oh! Would that we could see all four hands.

Andrew and I were knocked out of the Cotton cup by Michael and David. This hand which I played might have changed the result.

I opened 1♦ and got the inevitable 1♠ response East came in with 2♣ and I forced with 2♥. North 3♣ (any help?) – 3♥ – 3NT (I think 4♦ is better but this game is cold) and it was decision time for me. I decided on 6♦ we needed points. The 4♣ lead to 10, J and my A. I was quite pleased with my bid (the slam is odds on) but first I go to K♦ and discard the club. What now? I must lose only one ♥ and made the important error of leading the 9♥ from dummy. When the Q came I asked “this can only be from KQ(x) or single, which was it? But it is already too late. If I exit now with J♥ West wins and leads another trump I need two ruffs in dummy but can only on the 5-1 break ruff one of them.

If I had lead 6♥ when the Q appears I can read it for a possible singleton and simply play towards the 9♥ and ruff my loser. But how do I know that East has no trumps?

Sometimes your biggest mistake is sitting down!

Comment
Missed Chance v Cambridge Alumni

RAC played our annual match v Cambridge Alumni. While we lost by 35 Imps – not that much in team of 8, it was close all the way. They were hospitable as ever and featured two players who recently represented GB at the recent World Championship.

After a nightmare journey into town I was not fully awake on B3. RAC N/S Not vul.

I opened 1♣ and North – 1. East came in with 2, I risked 2♠ and over North – 3♣ chanced 3NT, looking at the 10/9.

North East South West
    1♣ pass
1 2 2♠ pass
3♣ pass 3NT pass

8 was lead to J and K. I tried the 10 to Q and on 6 return West dropped 8♠ (reverse attitude). Now I know the hand. East surely has K♠, A, and is known to have six . Overtake my 10 in Dummy. Now cash ♣, end in hand. East has to make two discards. She must retain A but cannot keep both four winning and a guard to the K♠. Either discard is fatal. Exit with a if that is the discard or cash out the ♠. I dozed, took the ♠ finesse and left myself in Dummy with the 4th round of ♣. Not made in the other room either. Flat board.

A Chance Missed.

Comment
The Computer Strikes Again.

Almost every club these days uses computer dealt hands. We have become accustomed to freaks, nine card suits, even 7-6 shapes. Hands must be valued on shape and controls not just points. This one hit me the other day at the local club. South deals EW only are vulnerable.

South passed and West opened 2NT (20-22 no five suit) North at the favourable score decided after thought on 3♠. East 5♣ and South an immediate 6♠! Just three bids and we are already in slam zone. West, decided that the danger of one or two losing was too great and doubled for the money. This went for +500 but scant consolation for the 7♣ making on the finesse.

The hand is a lesson on the pre-empt. North can see that despite his low point count any kind of a major suit fit would make a sacrifice v a slam cheap at the score. What about East? He can see that opponents are going to sacrifice they must have at least 10 spades between them, he is only going to get one chance to describe his hand. A six suit, and TWO first round controls is clearly very powerful. I think 4♠ (bid again partner) is best. Now on to South the rule here is – ask yourself if they bid slam are you going to let them play it? If the answer is – no, then go there now – 6♠. All this heaps pressure on the dealer (it seems a long time ago). Who wants to be in a G Slam on a finesse? Perhaps the best bid is a forcing pass leaving the unknown hand to decide.

So, no clear solutions and a lesson in pre-emption.

Comment
The Two Game Swing Disaster.

RAC Morgan. Marina, Terry, Paul W, Tony, resumed in the League v ICL this week. Impeccable ethics – deo gratias. We won in the end convincingly by 36 Imp but were not pleased with ourselves on B6 East dealt and only his side vulnerable. We will see all four hands from the first.

R1. RAC N/S. Playing a strong NT, South opened 1♣ and West leapt to 4♠. North X and played A, A♣ and another. West drew trumps and threw his losing on J. 4♠x+1 +990.

R2. RAC E/W South opened 12-14 NT and West – nervous at the vulnerability – 2♠. N X which was described as “values” and South replied 3♣. West had one more try with 3♠ and North’s 4 was passed out for + 450. This all added to 1440 and +16 Imps to ICL.

In the lively (sic) PM the first spotlight fell on North in R1. Many felt that after an opening bid by South, and surely seven spades on the right, made a slam a serious possibility. He argued that as the cards lie, absolute par is N/S +450 (no! 5 is only one down). The X should net + 500. A lead to the 3, 6♣ to J♣ and 7 – ruff – (McKenney for K) another underlead and a second ruff. So North was technically correct – but if you X you must get the defence right!

The spot now shifted to West in R2. Why did he not bid more? He argued that – as has been seen – Par was achieved (sic) and with just his 12 points the remaining 27 are held by the opposition and the risk of a huge penalty after the first X was there. He bid twice and could not blame his partner for silence!

Tough

Comment
The Sure Trick Problem.

The American writer George Coffin and the Swiss Pietro Bernasconi specialised in the “sure trick” test. You are given the two hands to play as declarer and must find the 100% line. An example hit me the other night.

West deals at love all and passes, North opens 1  his partner supports to 3 and you go to 3. Let us look initially at the EW cards.

You get the lead of 5♠ to the K♠ and win your A♠ J is covered by the K and trumps are 2-2. The hand boils down to losing only one ♣ trick, the solution is simple once you think of it. Cash A and exit with a ♠. They take their ♠ and winners but must open ♣ or concede a ruff and discard. The Sure Trick line.

Take another look. This time you are in 4 – it’s late on and you need points! Now you need to get a discard on the 4th round of clubs. After drawing trumps, you lead Q♣ which is covered, you win and knock out the J♣, return to dummy with your preserved 4 and take the discard.

Time to see all four hands. Show all

Comment
The Obligatory Finesse.

My Daughter sent me a hand the other day which threw up an old principle which may be new to a few of you. We will look at the N/S hands only.

You arrive at 6♣ (well bid) a trump is led and you end in Dummy, when they fall in two rounds. You count your tricks. 5-♣ 2- 2- and at least one ♠ and a ♠ ruff makes 11. You lead the 2♠ to the K (not the Q you want the Ace to appear) but opponents are good and the 3♠ comes on the right and the 4♠ on the left without a flicker from either of them. Now if West had AJ4 he would have won immediately. The honours are split. If West has the Ace you must return to dummy and finesse the 10♠ but if East has it, you must put up the Q♠ second time round.

What to do? It depends on how good you think West is. If he is clever enough to duck his Ace then you finesse – had he put the Ace on the first round the finesse would be obligatory. You would have no other choice. As things stand now that East has played low again it’s a guess.

Several points here. The old principle of never covering an honour the first time when you can equally do so next time. This means opponents have to work out that the K has been played from KQ. The second point is that when you are on lead versus a slam and looking at what seems to be a certain trick, give serious thought to where your second trick is coming from.

What happened to my daughter? She got the A♠ lead.

Comment
The Dodds Cup Match 23 Sept 19

RAC Morgan narrowly lost its Dodds cup match on the above. The match was unfortunately marred by the most blatant breach of ethics that I have ever encountered in all my decades of play.

Neither team showed to advantage on this slam hand but RAC came out on top. 

For the opposition East opened 1♠ and continued 2 – 3 – 3♠ – 4♠ – 4NT (RKCB) – 5♠ (intended as 2 Keys and ♠Q but understood as 3 Keys) 5NT (do you have Q♠? but thought to mean any unbid K?) – 6 (yes one) – 7♠. After long thought and explanations South led Q♣ for -2.

For RAC 1♠ (5 cards) – 2NT (game force, at least 4♠ and 12+) East now bid 3♣ which showed shortage (should be one only) and they proceeded 4NT – 5♠ – 6♠. Without the Club lead – impossible to find – all thirteen tricks rolled in. 17imps to RAC.

However having gone through Blackwood West should protect his K♣ and play the hand himself in the unbeatable 6NT.

Comment
The Negative Double or the Business Double.

RAC put out a team of 12 V Hurlingham on 16 September. They were not as competitive as normal and RAC were overwhelming winners of a most enjoyable match.

My foursome Marina & Terry / Paul & I made a combined mess of B10. Dealer E and only NS vul. Let’s look at all four hands.

In room 1 RAC opened 1D and S bid a weak 2S. (this at team play and unfavourable V is inexcusable risking a huge penalty) West playing negative X did just that. East is forced to bid 3C. West tried 3NT, fell from his usual Declarer standard & went -1. In Room 2 after the same auction H were playing business X, they doubled and took 1100. There is nothing wrong with either method – just the execution! West playing Neg X would clearly like to X for penalty. He passes, as does N and East reopens with X which West can pass. He said afterwards that he wanted to show his Heart suit. But this is an illusion. The suit is useless without 4 cards opposite and can still be reached by a pass. 

Comment
What Do You Lead Against a Slam?

At Pairs when opponents have bid unopposed and confidently to a slam the temptation to cash an Ace – if you hold one - is huge. The fear of conceding an overtrick is real. Moreover, you cannot assume that they have made a bidding error! Let us look first at North’s dilemma.

West Deals. Game All.

Show North only first

The bidding goes: 1♠ – 4NT (RKCB) – 5 (2 keys) – 6♠. Your lead? You decide against this uninformative auction to lead A and hope that K will come in later.

Show all four hands

When dummy shows it is obvious that East has made the common error of thinking 5 means two ACES! When A wins, North switches to 2♠ and S discards. Declarer at least now knows the A♣ is in South. How? Because if North had it, she would try to cash it! With this knowledge the play is easy, three red winners and one ♣ trick plus the cross ruff and we are home. The best lead is clearly a trump, it helps but the slam can still be made. Win in dummy and a to K and A. Another trump and essentially similar play including the now needed ruffing finesse in ♣, does it. If East plays the hand a lead beats it. East’s 4NT is precipitate to say the least. Much better is the splinter – 4 now – 5♣ – 5♠ (I have done enough) and 6 (grand slam try) – 6♠ (No!). An instructive hand with many useful lessons.

Comment
Shape & Aces.

One of my oft repeated themes is the power of Aces and the shape of a hand. When they do come together, they are immensely powerful. Come and sit in my seat at the local club. East deals and is Vul.

East opened with 2♣ – Benjamin showing an 8 playing trick hand. At the vulnerability I decide to come in with 2♠. West 3♣ and North 4♣ (agrees ♠ no need to rush the opponents have yet to show their hands). East continued with 4. Then 4♠ – 5 and then – 5. Passed to me. What is going on? What do you think? Make your decision before looking at the full hand.

Show all hands.

Clearly North has a ♠ fit and it sounds like A but what about my minor suit losers? Surely East for his bid has something other than big ?

I bid 5♠ and played there. I ruffed the lead and led ♠, caught the K♠ and took the marked finesse for all the tricks. The board was played 10 times. Seven in 5♠+2 and three in 5-1 once doubled. Both sides have 20 points! It is hard, I think, to visualise that North has THREE first round controls. I do not think that East has a Benji 2♣. I would despite the vulnerability open 5 and it is I think impossible to think beyond a X in North. Shape and Aces!

Comment
Slam Bidding on Mentor Night - 1

On 5 September – mentor night – again the circles weakness on slam bidding was exposed. I thought the most interesting was B6. Paul W and I played it against Andrew K (great to see him back) and Brigitte. Mentees there were none! They were N/S Not Vul and E dealt. We will look first at their hands.

They bid beautifully. 1  (5 card majors ) 1♠  – 2♠  - 4NT (RKCB) – 5  (1or4 keys) – 5  (do you have the Q of trumps?) – 6♣  (yes and the K♣ ) – 6♠ . The A  is lead and continued W shows 10- 4. When the first round of trumps is played, East plays the 2♠  and West the 10♠  plan the play.

There are 12 top tricks provided the ♠ break 3-2 so you should assume the do not. Much easier set as a problem, would I be talking if they did break? If one hand has J108x then there is no hope. So one hand has to have single J or 10. The normal logic is to play up to the double honour and if a singleton shows finesse the 9♠. Which hand has four trumps? There is one far from conclusive clue. When a good player cashes an Ace v a slam. He has a number of reasons. The bidding has told him that Dec knows he has a missing Ace and no other obvious holes. So his only hope is a trump trick either for him or his partner. Opponents have bid   so his A  will set up the suit. Never the less he has done it. This suggests that he has hope in trumps.

Show all hands

N A♠  catching the 10♠  and 9♠  probably covered, return to K  a follow with the 7♠  for the contract. It will not surprise you to learn that the slam was bid three times but never made. I do not think anybody is surprised!

Comment
In Wales We Trust

I went to Wales over New Year and played at Cardiff BC the strongest club in Wales. A welsh selector Gwynn Davis writes a website column, similar (but with more space) to my own. I had a look at some back numbers and this one intrigued me.

This was a Green Pointed pairs event and 27 pairs bid the obvious 3NT but only 8 made it. On a S lead West wins and has 8 tricks on top. If break it is +2. However, if they do not there is an 100% line once both follow to the A. Overtake Q, (safety play) if the J is still out continue for +1.

Show full hand.

One Declarer played the A and claimed that S had taken a long time to play her Single 8 (disputed) he therefore thought she had two or more and did not need the safety play. It’s PAIRS remember, and 3-2 break +Jx are heavy odds on. The TD (very experienced) was called and ruled +1.

The point here is that the singleton pest exists in all clubs. You get to know who they are but in open competition V unknown opponents you do not. Players should always play in an even tempo. If you fumble a simple apology or “no reason to hesitate”

Comment
Slam Bidding on Mentor Night - 1

The 1st of August was mentor night and the Circles old weakness slam bidding was much in evidence. B16 West deals. Opponents silent.

West opens 2♣ – (game force) and East with his A & K responds with a positive 3. Now 3♠ – sets the suit – 4♠ (agrees the trumps, nothing new to say) now 5♣ (cue, help me) 5 – the key bid, East has already said he is minimum for his bid but this is where his values lie – 6♠ . At one table West used RKCB, but this is no help and gambled the slam anyway. Only two pairs bid it.

Comment
The Forcing Pass

Everybody even at the highest levels is vulnerable to the preempt. Why? Because it uses up communication space for the opponents. It forces them on limited information* to guess the right action. Sometimes you/they guess wrong. Look at a typical example I played locally. We will see the whole hand. EW Vul. South deals.

South can make 9 tricks in ♠, East with careful play (eschew the finesse, use the K to lead 10♣). North covers and East, takes 5 , 2 and three Clubs for game. We have the classic confrontation.

At one table South opened 4♠ . Personally I would not. The hand with two aces has defensive values, nothing is known about the total hand as dealer. Give North, East’s hand and 7♠ makes. The 4♠ is passed to E who feels he must go 5 . South now must pass (assume you have done the damage – you have!) and so does W. N at the vulnerability decides to go one more 5♠ and East passes. This is forcing. It says “I have got good H and have bid vulnerable to 5H, I have a good hand but do not know anything about you, I think you are better qualified to decide” The choice is 6 or X. West has a possible defensive trick in K and maybe the Q♠ has value. With nine losers surely 6 is not there. Partner needs to provide two winners if my K stands up. He decides to X. for +300.

The scoresheet predictably showed 4♠ -1 x3, 5♠X -2 x2, and 5 -2 x2.

So the shared top was for 5♠X. Remember the forcing pass. It means I have done my best – you decide.

Comment
Second Degree Assumption

As Declarer our problem usually revolves around the location of opponents’ high cards. We have various solutions to this. If they must be in a certain place, we simply play for that to be so. We listen to the bidding, and form hypotheses, or we use discovery techniques. In the real world we often have situations where all we really know is what might be.

This normal looking hand, published in 1958* caused much comment at the time. The bidding opens with West as dealer – 1 – X – 2. South jumps to 3♠ and North raises to game. West leads A or K. Ruff the second , draw trumps in two rounds (W throws a ) you can choose which hand to be in.

Your move?

You can be beaten if you lose two ♣ and K. But only if East, holds A♣. Your first instinct is to lead Q for the finesse, but this is a no win, play, If E has K he simply covers, and you are no better off. A♣ in East is what we fear, then let us assume it is the case.

This leads us to another solution. Lead towards the Q, if the K appears you have three tricks in the suit and can discard both of Dummys’ clubs. If it does not and East wins, listen again to the bidding. West must have A♣ for his opening bid.

Show all four

What you have done is: if one card is critical for success assume it is wrong and form your hypothesis accordingly. Second Degree Assumption.


*Terence Reese, The Expert Game

Comment
A Trump Control

On mentor night somebody brought up the subject of instructive books to read. A mentor mentioned a relatively recent publication of merit. However, I disagreed. The problem for beginners and intermediates is where to begin. Recent publications tend to assume a level of knowledge by their reader going in. They are afraid – rightly – of talking down to their audience. Last week I drew attention to Terence Reese “The Expert Game” published in 1958. Yes 61 years ago! My recommendation for intermediates is “Card Play Technique” by Mollo & Gardner dated 1955 and reprinted many times since. The format is one of a themed chapter and a series of exercises at the end. In the chapter on trump control there is this hand.

With D wide open West plays in 4S on the 4-3 fit. The defence takes two  tricks and switches to a . If you cash your three top trumps and they do not break 3-3 (4-2 is about 60%) the defence simply waits to ruff the third or fourth round of Clubs, continues  and Declarer loses a  at the end. The solution is simple, win the  and lead a low trump from hand everything is now under control.

Comment
Our Only Bottom of the Night!

On Board 21 last Thursday Stephen and Michele Potel handed us our only bottom. I wrote some time ago in HOW that when your partner has a very big hand his expectations are minimal. But this means what little you do have, become very important. Michele clearly knew this when she held the West hand and her partner opened the game force 2♣. NS only vul. East deals.

She responded the negative 2  and got the reply 3NT (25/26 balanced) Now a simple 6NT could be bid but she chose 4  and wound up in 6. On the actual hand she got a ♠ lead, drew trumps, returned to K♠ and took the winning  finesse. When Clubs broke 3-3 that was 6+1 for a complete top.

I have altered the actual deal to make a neat point. Declarer plays the hand the same way but when N covers the Q Dec wins and returns to J and runs trumps. North is squeezed and cannot hold both minors. The old rule applies – never cover the first time when you can always cover the second. Dec needs to cash the A but cannot get back to hand to run trump. The squeeze collapses.  

So should the 13thtrick never be taken? No! Draw trumps as before, cash the top ♣ and discover the break. Return to K♠ and run trumps. West is squeezed and has to come down to K10 of . when the Q is lead it matters not whether he covers. 

Why do we play this stupid game?    

Comment
I enjoy the Cotton Cup...

I enjoy the Cotton Cup although I have only won it once. Out in the first round last year I tried with Andrew again and we drew Ivan and Tania Kerno. We always had the edge on cards and were easy winners. Rubber bridge so rarely played, calls for different tactics. Here is an example. South opened with 1  (5 cards) and West overcalled 1♠ . Now in the rubber game you press for it and North decided on 2♠  (UACB at least a good raise to 3 ) passed to South who bid his second suit 3♣ . North looked at his Clubs and went to game. The A♠ was lead, to the 5, 2, and Q♠ . What now? The 2♠ should signal a three suit.

South Deals and is Vulnerable

Is the QS a true card? If it is, an attempt to cash the K would surely be fatal. Declarer surely has 5H tricks. He has bid C over the 2S missing the AJ so surely, he has 5C. If they are headed by the KC then he has ten tricks in the black suits. So the assumption must be made that Partner has the KC.Show all.

 You lead 3C to the KC and a diamond switch by East does the trick. At rubber bridge overtricks do not matter. It is counter intuitive to lead Declarer’s suit. Remember in the rubber game opponents will be pressing for a conclusion. 

This means that they are literally vulnerable. 

Comment
Slam Bidding on Mentor Night - 2

B 2 is more difficult. East deals. 

East opens 1D and West responds 1H – 2S (at least 5-4 game force)   - 2NT - 3H (agrees suit)  – (East has now shown 4-3-5-1 and a max opener), most players now simply signed off in 3NT. But if it continues 4C - 4D – 4NT (RKCB one or four keys) 6H can be bid. The slam can be made with careful play despite trumps being 5-0, the club Q drops in three rounds. Note the trump intermediates and their importance. Nobody bid the H slam and one pair got a deserved bottom for playing in 5D.

Comment
Devonshire Cup 2019.

Those members who read the Times may have caught A. Robson’s article last week. Unusually it contained errors so here is a shortened version of my article.

I love the Devonshire Cup because it throws up unique tactical situations. Only simple systems permitted and both sides made costly mistakes in Old Blackwood responses. We were up 1130 at the half, and with three boards to go, they missed a 14 trick Grand but bid the small slam. The bridge Gods then gave us this: 

B23 RAC N/S E/W only vulnerable South deals.

S passed as did W and I opened 1D – 1S and S perforce - pass. W - 2H. I decided with them bidding majors we must have a fit in one minor and at worst a sacrifice – 3C -3H and my partner made the excellent pre-empt of 5C- 5H (doubtful) and I am on the spot. Partner must have a H shortage – maybe void- short in D. Nobody else has bid S so she must have some length and long weak C. While I do not think 5H will make with the wild shapes around it could, and on top of their previous small slam it could mean a match winning Rubber so I went 6C (it could not be expensive) no X. On a H lead I see that if I can make all nine trumps and 3 Aces, I am home. I cross ruff, cashing AS first and discarding a D from hand leaving this position with the lead in North. 

                                       S….. 

                                       H.8

                   S…..            D.10              S. K

                   H  J97          C. AQ9          H. Q…..

                   D. Q                                  D…. 

                    C.7              S. 10976       C. K43

                                        H…..

                                        D….

                                        C.J

I ruff the 8H in dummy and lead another S. On this West must discard QD (counter intuitive establishing the 10D) at the table he threw a useless H I ruffed the S and exited with the 10D. East is forced to play 3C and lead into AQC. 6C bid and made. 

Can it be beaten? The easy way is an initial trump lead; but look again at the end position. If West had got rid of the QD on the last S ruff he could overruff the 3C with his 7C and any lead now kills the end play. 

So what was the rare Robson error?  In the column he printed the full hand and the end position. But while full hand is correct, in the end position the Seven of clubs is now in East. 

Comment
He Deserved a Better Result.

There was a curious twist to the recent narrowly won match betweenRAC and the In & Out. Our good friend and RAC member Pralab Barua, was playing for the other side. When I enquired as to why, he explained, “I was not considered good enough!” this hand will perhaps enable you to form your own opinion. East deals Game All.

The In & Out were EW with Pralab West. RAC silent and they bid: 1H – 2C – 2D, Pralab contemplated his fit and shape and decided to push for the slam. 4NT (RKCB) – 5C (0 or 3keys) – 6D. The KS was lead. Show all hands.

The slam looks good until N discards 2S on the first round of trumps revealing the certain loser. Declarer did not pursue the best line and went one down. At no other table was the good slam bid. I thought at the time that after the 4- 0 trump break was discovered the hand could be made by establishing C: but after careful analysis I think the 5-1 break in that suit scuppers it as well. 

Anybody disagree? 

If it had made, it would have virtually tied the match

What we can agree is that Pralab deserved better!

Comment
Not Actually Déjà vu!

I did not play on 21 June. Who wants to play Bridge when Royal Ascot is on? Looking for material for HOW I was immediately caught by the very first Bd. North deals at Love All. My first reaction was that the C Cup No2 had been reprinted. Take a look - not so of course. This was the hand: 

Two passes came to South’s Whale. Big hand, two suiters, particularly if they are minors are awkward with a big 2C system. Too often you use up valuable bidding space well before you have shown the nature of your hand. For this reason, I prefer a 1D opening and favour a jump 3C (game force) as a rebid. Yes, the hand could be passed out but from your opponents, perspective at Pairs it is rarely right not to protect in such situations. The bidding then goes 1D – 1H -3C – 4C (might try 3S) and South bids 6C. 

How to play it on the safe 4S lead?

Four clubs and four D are surely there plus 3 Spades and AH. That is 12 but there is no immediate entry to AH, Clubs may lose the Q and D the K. However, if we do not draw trumps the chances of an overruff are there.

 How to maximise our chances?

 I think the best line is to cash two top trumps. On the actual hand the Q drops, and our problems are over. Let us assume it does not, then the ruffing D finesse is taken with 10C in Dummy. This finesse is still 50% and with the chances of the QC dropping raises the combined odds above that. It is the best line. 

On the night the board was played 7 times. 6NT x 2 for the top score. Presumably desperation forced them into the C play. 7NT -3, 5C and 5D (ugh) both made + 1. 3NT +2 for an undeserved good score and just one in 6C but -2.

 Not impressive but a difficult hand.    

Comment
Centenary Cup No 3. The Unanswered question.

This was Bd 27 in the Cup. South deals at Love All.

I was South and opened with the orthodox 2NT and Paul went 4NT- quantitative. With a balanced shape and a minimum, I passed and got JD lead. When Dummy went down, I realised to my horror that if the QD was covered. I was going down in this 30 point game. Worse still 6C was probably cold. (Our partners Terry and Marina after the same opening went to 6C-1; but played by N, after West came in with 3D) However I simply put up QD and when it won, knocked out AC for 12 tricks. The fireworks which decided the Cup took place in Reform v Roehampton. Roehampton on their two tables, where they were N/S, made the obvious 3NT+3 just like me, but Reform as South went 3NT-2 (I do not know how) and 4S by N also -2. This cost 22 imps and their 3Bd match contributed a total of +47 imps or 36% of their winning total. 

The question to be asked is should the Cup be decided in this way?

Comment
Weak Twos: System Responses.

When partner opens with a weak two bid, choices arise. What system are you using? I play as do many others, Ogust responses. Assume a 2H opener (6-9 points 6+H), a 2NT response asks Partner to describe his hand - 3C – low points bad suit. and then in steps – good suit, low points – good suit and points – maximum. Others use this as an asking bid and opener shows a shortage in the suit bid. I much prefer Ogust on my old principles, tell partner what he does not know, maximise the information. Now let us look at a not so typical problem. West deals. Love all. Opens 2H. Pass to you East.  

Possibilities abound, looks like N/S have a Spade contract. You have no Ace. While you have two good suits, they are useless without a fit. 4H may be on but if P has a bad suit it could be horrible and over 2NT you are already too high. If you bid a minor – forcing this will tell opponents that you are limited and encourage them to compete, they are likely to have the balance of points. Your move. Decide before you look at the whole hand.  Show all four

On balance I think 3D is best it leaves all options open -  Pass and - 3H (tells you nothing) North, realises they might have something – 3S ( may make if you drop KS!) you try 4C (you must continue) and Partner raises to 5C. You get 3S lead and ruff the second round. If H are 3-2 then a dummy reversal works. These are better odds than a D ruffing finesse. KC tells you trumps are not 4-0.  So, a H to the Ace and another S ruffed. Now you know that S holds AD (North would have bid earlier with three Aces) a H to the QH and when the suit breaks you ruff and draw trumps. On the night this was a top score +400. Partner pointed out that 4H also makes +420. Some partners are never happy! 

  

Comment
RAC v ACF. The Dreaded Two Game Swing.

The most talked about hand from the match was Bd 36. Let’s see all four hands. Dealer West Game all

The Board was played 6 times and at 5 of those tables the bidding went 1H – 4H end. Declarer lost the obvious three tricks for E/W +620. At our table North doubled for TO and after the same 4H South bid 4S and played there. West lead a KH. North won and played a trump to his K. West took his AS and made the unfortunate switch to a D, J, Q. But it is already too late. The JS fell when declarer trumps and the hand is an open book. In practice he cashed AD revealing the break and finessed the 8D losing two clubs at the death. NS + 620 and 15 imps to ACF almost wiping out RAC’s hard won lead. 

Our dear friend Deep Finesse says 4S can be beaten but how? East can get his Club ruff but that establishes the suit and only gives three tricks. Look again. West must lead a D! West comes in with AS then AC and a ruff and a D ruff. If you can find that defence, you are in a league of your own. Conclusions, West felt he had defence V the S game – reasonable, he has! We know now that he should bid 5H…… hindsight helps! What of the other tables North’s TO X is borderline but should be made, the red Aces make the difference. What of the 1H - 4H villains? When it comes back to North, he should recognise that he mightbe being swindled. East surely has nothing but shape and H support. A double now cannot be business and S can try 4S 

A classic “Match Decider” with all players on the knife edge.

Comment
How Bad is My Hand?

When your partner has a very good hand his expectations of your holding are low. This makes the values you do hold, that much more important. Consider East’s problem on this hand. 

RAC Morgan EW v Rolls Royce  B 14. Morgan wins the League.  South deals. Love All

South opens 1S and West 2S (H and another) North 3C and you choose to bid 3H. S 3S and W 4C (agrees H and first round control in Club). North X and you decide to bid 4H. South 4S and West 5D – 5H and South once more 5S. West passes to you. What do you do? Consider your answer before you look at the whole hand. 

Read on.

Partner is huge, despite your minimum bidding he refuses to give up. He must have a big red two suiter and first round controls in H,D,C. Now you regret not bidding 4D over 4CX. This would have shown him 9 red cards at least (and a non minimum) and opened his thought to a single C. Your hand therefore is massive under these conditions. Partners pass is forcing. He clearly could have doubled but has not done so. He is saying I have shown you everything – you decide. Your KD is gold as is your single C - 6H is the bid. 

See the whole hand

At the table East passed!

5S went -1 for a great NS result. In R2 EW were allowed to play in 4H +2 not good either. Absolute par is NS - 500 in 6S x - 3. But this depends on the finding the club ruff.

Congrats to Morgan for winning the league.

Comment
The Centenary Cup Memorable Hands 2

It is a sad fact of Bridge life that when you have competed in an event you dwell on your mistakes not your triumphs. This was true of the Cup. This was B25. North deals and his side only Vulnerable. 

North decided to open 1D. He has three loser hand and 20 points; but the old rule applies – look at the 4thcard in your long suit to assess its quality (the 7) so a fit is essential. Silent opponents and a 1H response 2S (game force). South gave a simple D preference – 3D. North now has a crucial decision. As can be seen 3NT +2 is the answer, but he needs so little opposite for a slam that he tried 4C. South now bid 5D (nothing more to say – cannot pass a game force – that’s it!) and North after long thought decided to go one more. The Spade 9 was lead and the KD ducked.  North tried to ruff a S, overruffed and one more trick lost for -200.

 Who is to blame? Nobody in my book. Oh, for a single H in N! Oh, for a 4thD in dummy or the 10D. The 7-1 S break impossible to predict. Six other pairs bid 6D going off and a few more went off in 5D (that’s a make). It was not costly, but it still rankles.

Comment
The 2019 Centenary Cup Memorable Hands 1

This year’s Cup featured hands with chances for both compass positions. In our match we turned over 90 imps in total!

This was B7 South deals at Game All. Let’s see the full hand.

At our table, South nervous of the need not to concede a big penalty nevertheless opened with a weak 2D (the seventh D was a clincher). 2H – 2S (good suit forcing) 3H from East –Pass - and 4H to North. It is now very difficult for him to envisage that 5D loses only two black aces. So 4H was passed out. The KD lead was overtaken by S who switched to 3C. Declarer was helpless. At the time played low, N gave his partner the club ruff and waited for his S trick. 5D was bid and made twice - doubled. Two more went off in 5D, it requires care. The H lead is ruffed and the KC lead immediately to the AC and another H ruffed. Now KD, QC throw last H, come to hand with a C ruff, draw trumps and concede AS. Two more pairs went off in 6D. The normal result was 4H -1 scant reward for the D game +600.  

Comment
Part Scores Crucial at Pairs.

As we all know part scores often decide our placing in a pairs contest. Every hand is a match, whereas at Teams making 6H is massively important where 2H much less. This hand, was played at Woodcote  6 May. B21. North deals and is Vulnerable.

North not playing weak twos, passed his borderline opening and West who could have thrown it in opened a weak NT (11-14). North 2S and East has an awkward bid. He would have liked to use Stayman; but the intervention kills that. N must be close to an opening bid and have a good 6 card suit. It also suggests that West’s values lie in the minors. East bid 2NT (Lebensohl) this demands the reply 3C. South with his scattered 9 points was reluctant to go to the three level, passed. 3C and back to East who now tried 3H (cannot show 5) knowing that without a fit partner will bid 4C. All pass. 

The JS was lead and Declarer could see that his minors would provide plenty of tricks, if he could keep trump control. He ruffed and played 4H to Dummy. S is forced to take his QH and with no knowledge of D decided to underlead his AD (S continuation is better). Dec to disguise his holding went up with KD and then 7H. North far from clear about the hand played KH to AH and 10H. Another D followed and S unaware that his Partner had a trump took his AD and continued S, ruffed with Dec last H, over to AC, JH draws trumps. This makes Two S ruffs, Three H. Four D and two Clubs, E/W+200 and nearly all the match points. 

So much to comment on! I would despite the vulnerability open 1S as North, East might X and some number of S raise would surely silence them. Lebensohl is worth adopting after 1NT interference. Use Google if unknown to you.

 Note that NS make 3S always. The defence to 3H on the bidding is difficult (lack of information) but persistent S forces makes it impossible in real life. Declarer postponed every key decision until the last minute. A challenging hand with opportunities for both sides.

Comment
A Squeeze? A Finesse? But which Finesse?

RAC Morgan played current DIV 3 League leaders for the top spot. In the previous match we had fought a memorable 65-65 Draw! I thought the most intriguing hand was B9. Dealer N EW Vul.

This was the hand:

Room 1 – RAC NS. East opened 3H West thought and bid 6H “surely 7 H tricks 3D AS and one in the wash”. South after some time lead 8H. Well how do you play it? You have 11 clear tricks. If the AC is in N the KC is the twelfth. If the JD is in S then a simple finesse of the 10D wins. However, caution, if it is covered you need to unblock the 9D and need an entry back to Dummy. If the 4Diamonds and the AC are in the same hand, then a squeeze will operate against either opponent*. But in that case either finesse will work equally well. Your move!       Show all four. 

For the squeeze to work it requires two key suits to be together. Therefore a 50% finesse is best; But which one? There is I think one inconclusive clue. S took time to lead a neutral H. She eschewed the normal S attack. This suggests she holds AC. It’s not much, but if this hypothesis is correct then the D play is best. RAC stayed out of the slam in Room 2 and in R1 a club was lead towards the K.

*Declarer draws trumps, Takes AS ruffs a S and runs trumps. S bares AC and Dec puts him in with AC. BUT if he exits with JD the suit is blocked and he still goes down. NO on the last H when the QC is thrown the 5D is discarded and the JC becomes the final trick.   …. 

Comment
A Chance Missed.

I played with Colin Freeman on the 25thof April. We played quite well but could only score 46%! We did miss a good chance on B19. South deals and EW are vulnerable.

South passed and West with his 5 loser hand opened 1D North’s 2C was passed back to West who made a take out X. North 3C and East best bid is a responsive X offering a choice of the majors. But not having this understanding passed and West X again. Now he bid 3S and N went 4C which East should X but he passed and West went to 4S doubled by N. The 2C was lead and N switched to the KH. 

Declarer considers the problem. The whole missing 18 points are surely in N. If the 2C is to be believed S has four and N is not as long in the suit as we thought. This would explain why he did not jump over the first X. Trumps must 4-1 at best. So that is the blueprint. Once you have done this work, it is easy. AH and AK of D and the third ruffed with 10S. Ruff a C and a fourth D ruffed with JS another C ruff and the last D with the KS the AQS are still in dummy and that is 10 tricks. We went one down – 200 for a joint bottom and nobody made ten tricks in S. 

The lesson is do not draw trumps!    

Comment
Minor Suit Slams – Always Tricky.

Minor suit slams are difficult to bid, particularly at Pairs. Why? Because we fear bypassing 3NT. Who wants to take 11 Club tricks when you can make at least 10 in NT?   Two hands on successive nights came at me last week. The first at Woodcote B2.

                      S.KQ108              S……

                      H.K9                    H.QJ62 

                      D,AQ7                 D.K53 

                      C.AJ105               C.K87643

West decided to get the hand off his chest and bid 2NT (20-22) and East considers his response. The key asset is of course the club length, with a modest fit there are six tricks available. He bids 3S (showing club length), this is conventional and demands either 3NT or if W likes it 4C – which he does of course. Now 4S cue - 5D - 6C. Played 13 times, nobody bid the slam.

 The second occasion came at my local club the following night.

                         S.QJ75               S.A10 

                         H.AQ96             H.3 

                         D.AK                 D.J1075 

                         C.KQ6               C.A97542 

The same opening bid, 2NT and 3S the response. W obviously likes it also - 4C – 4S – 4NT (RKCB) – 5H (two keys) 6C. When the finesse of the S10 won and the clubs broke 2- 2 East was able to ruff a D for all thirteen tricks. This was worth 70% of the match points.

 It is easy to overlook the 2S transfer, which can also be used for D. One to remember.    

Comment
Woodcote and the Two Game Swing.

Pall Mall and Woodcote played their annual joust on 3 April at the country club. Pall Mall were convincing winners in a most enjoyable match. Both sides featured unfamiliar partnerships, so the standard was not high! The hands were dealt at the table (cannot blame the computer) and at my table this was the last board. Love all dealer East.

From the first we will look at all four hands. Any major suit game fails by NS when it loses three minor suit tricks and AH, but they must be cashed quickly. EW can make 6C but not 6D if the S trick is again taken early.   

What actually happened? At my table I opened 1S and the WP pair bid 3D. Passed back to me and I enquired as to the meaning of 3D? Weak, 7D or some such I was told. Now it is clear I do best to pass! But I bid 3H now 4D – 4H – pass and 5D back to me. This does not smell right to me (West had been shown to be a sound bidder) and I declined to go on or double. Partner lead KH and Declarer took the ten minor suit winners and AH. +400 to WP. A difficult hand for an untried Pair and the club fit never found.

 I think the best bid over 1S is the unusual 2NT showing both minors. At the prevailing score N may bid 3S and the secondary H fit will not be uncovered. But now East can bid 4C and the slam might be reached. What is worth noting is the need to uncover the double fit on both sides. Absolute par is 6S X -3 +500 to NS far too risky unless the H fit is discovered.  

Comment
Protection.

Protecting partners pass is an important tactical stroke and particularly important in pairs play. What does it mean? When opponents have limited their hands the last person to speak has a good idea of his partner’s holding. Partner, who cannot speak because he does not yet know they are limited, needs to be protected.

This was the last board played by the winners v the runners up on Teams night 28 March. B6 EW vulnerable. East deals.

East opened a 12-14 NT passed to West who has an awkward bid. He decided to bid 2S (transfer to 3C) North who does not know he has the best hand at the table has to pass and 3C is bid. Passed to W again, who as planned bids 3D. This returns to South who says “I have just 7 Points, but two 5 Card suits. They have not tried for a major fit, and we can count on W for not much more than a bad 6 card D suit. Partner has probably got the best hand at the table and H” So he bid 3H but was raised to 4H. The defence found the obvious play of AKC a ruff and AD for one down. *

Dummy put down on the club lead, and remarked, “I hope you like the trumps”? Declarer said, “I have bid ALL of your hand already”!

 That is the important point here. 

In any protectivesituation, partner is biddingyour hand for you because you cannot.   

 *It is worth noting that even 3H can be beaten. A club is lead to the KC and an immediate ruff is given to W who now must switch to a S.  

Comment
The Heffalump.

We played ICL in the league. We were +31 after the first 12 but drew the second half to win. We were outbid on B18 NS vul. East deals.

Let us look at the dealer only first. It is known in the trade as an Eau de Cologne 4711, or a Heffalump because it is top/bottom heavy. Do you open?  A weak 3C would not be right with the 4S. You have only 9 points and just one defensive trick. My view is no. That said, the counter is, how do you ever express the hand if you do not? The overall lesson is these Heffalumps almost never play well in the 4-4 fit. 

Show all hands.

Our opponents bid 1C – 1D – 1S (not me) 2H (4thsuit key bid) 3C - 3S - 4C. Now West knows that E has bid his suit three times missing AK. 4NT (old Black) 5D (Ahh AH!) 6C. who can quarrel with success? In Room2 we bid.  Pass 1D -2C – 2S – 4S – 4NT – 5D (one key) and W knowing that either KS or AH is missing stopped at 5S, made for the loss of 10imps. I think the error is the precipitate jump to S game. 2S is a game force so 3C costs nothing and must show six. Now W counts 6 club tricks, 3D (and possibilities) one S makes 10 does P have AH? 4NT – 5D (yes!) 6C must be worth a shot.    

Comment
Memories of Ross Cope.

The Circle was saddened to learn that Ross Cope died on Sunday the 17 March after a short illness. We remember him as a fine player, a most pleasant partner and teammate, a Committee stalwart for many years, a much-loved Circle member. Among his many attributes was fluent Italian, very useful when playing old friends Olgiata. I am reminded of a training session he organised for the match. This was perhaps the most spectacular hand. West deals N/S vul.

At all four tables West pre-empted in D and South eventually played in 6S on KD lead. Only one player made the contract. Declarer took his Ace and counted 10 top tricks in his hand, three more in Clubs on the table. The only problem, how to get there? His first thought was could the 8S be single? If so then 7S would give the vital entry. When this failed, he had to think again, he drew another round of trumps discovering the 3-1 break. There was an audible gasp from the three other participants when he put the 4S down.  East was helpless, he tried 3H but when this ran to the JH it was all over.

We have lost a great friend may he rest in peace.

Comment
The Sims night – Slams again.

We participated in the Sims night on behalf of the RNLI. It was mentor night and I played with a guest. An old colleague, for the first time. We made two huge errors which cost us a top ten finish nationally but still scored 64% overall. Look at the results, the Circle slam bidding remains horrible. We got this one right (or did we?). Board 14 East deals. None Vul. 

Opponents silent we bid: 1S – 2D – 3S - 4C (now I know I am in the slam zone – cue bid agrees S) – 4H – 4NT (now the wheels came off, my partner did not play RKCB!) - 5S ??? Now I should protect my minor suit tenaces and bid the cold 6NT, but unsure, raised to 6S. South lead 3C. Dec counted his 8 tricks in the majors, plus his minor aces. If he takes AC and the D finesse loses then he is down. How to combine the chances? P looked at the club spots only KJ missing, ducked losing to KC (what a false card from KJXX!) on the H return he won drew trumps, and again finessed 9C. when the J fell on the next round he could discard two D. None of this was mentioned in the booklet which was not distributed on the night. 

Comment
RAC Rolls Royce In Devonshire Cup Final.

I am delighted report that RAC RR Andrew, Brigitte, Roy and David G reached the final with the defeat of Roehampton Blue. Andrew on request showed me this hand. The boards are placed in blocks of six on the table so this board 26 was fifth up in the second half. 

N/S RAC were vulnerable East deals and passes:

Playing 5 Majors and SNT South opened 1C. North with no 4 card Major wished to find out more about P hand and chose 1D – good bid. South now went 2NT (18+) and the obvious 6NT was reached.

 There was one more twist. North won the D lead with the KD, knowing that just 4 Club tricks would see him home found the “ultra” safety play (think about it) of the 7C towards the J10. This forfeited the overtrick but then he could claim. In the other room the wheels came off and they inexplicably played in 6 D. Which nobody doubled.

Clearly they have every chance in the final, and we all wish them well.

Comment
RAC v Hurlingham - the Dreaded Two Game Swing!

Marina, Paul W, Howard and Tony played league at the delightful club on 25 Feb. The match finished 65-65. A score that gives a flavour of the excitement but does not reflect well on either team!

This was B15. South deals and is vulnerable.

In Room 1 for RAC 1D was opened and after 2S (weak) - pass – 4S he went to 5D. This as can be seen is beaten on 10H lead but cold played by N! Aware of the vulnerability East went 5S and N doubled with his AH. As can be see seen the killer lead is a club, but N lead his 4D. Was this from xxx? If it is, a continuation will concede a ruff and discard. South took, and paused a full four minutes (not his usual style) before continuing. The only card North can have to justify his X is AH but if Dec has (say)10xx a lead of the QH could establish the suit. He could hold QC, but if the suit is lead and he does not have QC it gives the contract. Eventually he decided the lesser risk was QH,  the 10H appeared & North knew he controlled the suit. He played another H and the KC had to be given. +100 to RAC.

In Room 2 The bidding went the same way but without the final X. When in with the KD South switched to the Club and 5S was made. RAC. + 420 and 11IMPs. 

Comment
Signals in defence can we learn something?

If you have ever sat behind a Master pair in a major tournament, you must have been surprised at the accuracy of their defence. The primary reason would surely be their signals. Let us look at four masters in action. East deals All vulnerable. 

We will see all four hands, but mentally please sit West and build your knowledge of the hands as we go. East opens 1C, South bids 4S! and you X. The 7C is lead to the 4,9 and Ace. Declarer needs D tricks so leads towards QD and loses to the AD. The KC is returned and when S ruffs you know the C position. S continues with KD and ruffs the third with AS and another S to the 9S. When Partner follows you know S hand. he is 6-1-5-1 so you only have one H trick, you need 3 more. Surely E has KH for his bid but with 7 clubs it is possible for S to have a single KH. However, you duck the QS now and next win the JS on which East throws the 10C. What does this mean? It is an “unnecessarily high card” must be a Mc Kenney asking for the higher of the two side suits to be lead. You win and lead 6H (your lowest) to KH and the Club return makes your 8S the setting trick.

Note the duck of QS so that when you put up the K, Partner has opportunity to signal his KH. Note too the early recognition of the importance of the 8S

Comment
What is an opening hand? Beware the Rule of 20.

What constitutes the values for an opening bid has been a discussion point for decades, Culbertson required 2.5 quick tricks, Goren in the 40’s moved to point count, extending the value by length in suits. Acol in the 50/60’s used similar methods but allowed a 6 card suit and 9 points. When the big club systems, Blue Club, and Precision were in vogue in the 70’s because the hand could not have 16+ points the openings got lighter and lighter. Today the rule of 20 is widely used. It says that the cards in the longest suits added to the high card point count should add to twenty. Like all rules at Bridge they must always be tempered with judgement. Two hands which show up the weakness of R20 were opened at my table recently. The first:

S. K H.A10543 D. 98765 C. K4 an opening 1H and a D rebid lead to a ludicrous game bid -3.

Worse still was (B19 on Valentines day)

West after a pass only vulnerable W opened 1S (5card majors) and rebid 2D over the 2C response. East tried 2NT, liking neither suit, and played there. On the H lead two hearts, one Spade two diamonds, and three clubs gave him 8 tricks and an undeserved good score. Do not ask me how, I can only relate what I saw.

Some further thoughts: 

  • Do not open suits that that you are not prepared to rebid.
  • You should have two defensive tricks.
  • Composition of suits should sway your decisions. 
  • If you are short on points are those points in the long suits?   

Comment
If you bid badly you must play well

Called in, last minute sub to a match v Royal Mid Surrey, friendly and most pleasant. We rapidly found their defence friendly as well. With a healthy lead after just 6 boards and a good continuation this was B12, Dealer West N/S Vul.

After 3 passes S noted, while just 22 points, it was all aces and kings (an old theme), it would probably make game opposite nothing. So 2C game force – 2D (relay or negative) - 3C -3NT (a few points, balanced negative). North appears to have no five card suit, opponents are silent, so she must have some sort of Club fit, South decided to gamble with 6C. West with few clues decided to lead a 9D (the Curse of Scotland) to Q, K, and AD. 

Dummy was a disappointment! A certain trump loser. and one sure ruff in Spades only added to 10 tricks. However, if the person with 3 trumps could be persuaded to overruff the 4th S, that would give us 11, and some sort of luck/squeeze in the red suits might materialise.  AKS and a ruff, AH, AC (note the 10 falling) and another S ruffed – but overruffed with JC. H return, ruffed and – relief – remaining trumps fell on the KC. Declarer now cashed his trumps throwing H from dummy. With three cards left, West elected to keep KH so thedesperate Declarer caught the 10D when leading to Dummy. It made no difference he would have been forced to finesse the 8D, 

Slam landed +1370. A muddle in the other room lead to them playing in 5H – 3 +300 for 17 IMPs to RAC. 

But could the Slam have been defeated? Did the Curse strike again? No “never cover an honour the first time when you can cover the second time”. 

Duck the KD. 

 

Comment
Auld Lang Syne.

I read recently Garozzo considered that while bidding standards today were at an all-time high. Card play was slightly worse than way back. This led me to exhume this hand from 1934. South deals.

The bidding was 1D – 2C – 2NT – 3C – 3NT dreadful bidding (I did warn you) and a ridiculous contract. 3S is lead. Any ideas? First rule when in such pits is to behave as if you had no care in the world. Do not duck the S. The only hope is to convince the defence that you have no entry to Dummy. Cash AC* and switch to KD! West feared the JD and ducked, now switch again to KH and for similar reasons this too is ducked. Now the JC is overtaken, and the game is landed. 

The hand was actually played by Josephine Culbertson, whom many shrewd judges felt was the more deadly of the species. It is a straight bluff.

 If only she were in charge on Brexit!

*On this trick West should peter with 9C. East should now ask what that holding could be when KH is played? It could not be from J98 so S must be trying to swindle the defence, easy to miss, and follow partners example  

Comment
It’s the New Year and No Change!

Yes, it is the old Circle weakness – SLAMS.  24 January Teams night, with an excellent 14 table turnout. B12 West Deals N/S vul.

14 pairs played it. 6NT was bid 3 times and defeated twice (on a D lead). Nobody bid the cold 6H. How should it be bid? N is not quite good enough for a 2 bid on any methods that I know. Opponents are silent.

1S – 2C – 3H (game force maximum big majors) – 3S (preference I am interested) 4H (must be at least 5-5 nothing new to say) - 4NT  (RKCB) agreed suit is S – 5S 2 keys and the QS – 6H pass or correct. Not sure about the S suit only 5 prefer the strong H suit. On a D lead Dec wins and cashes the two top H. He does not know S are breaking and may need the third H in dummy. Discards the losing D on the C and loses only to QH. 

Comment
Devonshire Cup 2019.

I have not played DC for a few years. We used to do well in Bob Bowman’s time and unfortunately the lack of good rubber bridge players since has frustrated me. That said I love it because it throws up such unique tactical situations. I was called up as a late sub into Andrew’s team. For those who do not know the event the boards are laid out differently in each match. We began v Hurlingham on B6. Only simple systems permitted and both sides made mistakes in Old Blackwood responses, The one by them missed a Grand and two by us cost slams. We were up 1130 at the half and with three boards to go in a new Rubber, they missed a 14 trick Grand but bid the small slam. The bridge gods then gave us this: 

B23 RAC N/S E/W only vulnerable South deals.

S passed as did W and I open 1D – 1S and S perforce pass. W - 2H. I decided with them bidding majors we must have a fit in one minor and at worst a sacrifice against their major game – 3C -3H and my partner made the excellent pre-empt of 5C- 5H (doubtful) and I am on the spot. Partner must have a H shortage – maybe void- short in D. Nobody else has bid S so she must have quantity and long weak C. While I do not think 5H will make with the wild shapes around it could and on top of their previous small slam it could mean a match winning Rubber so I went 6C (it could not be expensive) no X. On a H lead I see that if I can make all nine trumps and 3 Aces I am home. I embark on a cross ruff, cashing AS first and discarding a D from hand leaving this position with the lead in North. 

                                     S….. 

                                     H.8

                   S…..          D.10               S. K

                   H  J97        C. AQ9          H. Q…..

                   D. Q                                  D…. 

                   C.7              S. 1097 6      C. K43

                                       H…..

                                       D

                                       C.J

I ruff the 8H in dummy and lead another S. On this West must discard QD (counter intuitive establishing the 10D) at the table he threw a useless H I ruffed the S and exited with the 10D. East is forced to play3C and lead into AQC 6C bid and made. 

Can it be beaten? The easy way is an initial trump lead; but look again at the end position. If West had got rid of the QD on the last S ruff he could overruff the 3C with his 7C and any lead now kills the end play.   

Comment
First error of 2019.

This was the first board I played with Pascal on 10 Jan.

 B 21. North  deals and is vulnerable. The full deal was:

A typical pairs hand, All roads lead to 3NT probably by N. I opened 1C, playing weak NT, and the battle is for the contract. The 4H was lead to JH and the first battle is for the 9thtrick. We can count two H four C and two Aces. So something has to be done with the S. JS a very prompt Q and Ace and now toward the 10S. The odds favour split honours so we try 10S loses to KS and we pray for 3-3. But KH and another establishes the suit. West discards the 2C, dummy the 4C. Now cash clubs. E throws 3D, 2H. Dummy the 2D and West 4D, after long thought, 7S.It looks like East is 2-6-3-2 but who has the KD? If I put West in with 9S he will play a D and if it loses to KD I am going down. I decided to cash AD before exiting with the S which at worst ensured -1. West took his S and cashed D for one down. 

What was the clue I missed? East has shown KQS and KH, If he had also had KD also he surely would have overcalled IH over my club opener. So exit with the S without cashing AD. West is end played,  ten tricks. A difference of 13mps (joint top) and 5.  

Comment
Last Error in 2018.

On 20 December Sally asked me to play with a visitor. Erica Walker an English member domiciled in Dallas, over for Christmas with family. We agreed on Standard American Strong NT, 5 card majors, 3 weak twos. We played quite well; but had too many 45/55% boards to give us a hope of winning. We had only one serious misunderstanding missing an easy slam. Anxious to impress our visitor, late on, in need of points I pushed my luck on B11(rotated for convenience)

North deals at Love All 

North passes, East went 3H and I am on the spot. With partner passing it appears that at best we have the balance of points but EW surely control the majors and may have game. Chances are that we have a minor suit sacrifice. I went 4D intending to retreat to 5C if doubled. West raised to 4H and N - 5D. No double and the AS lead. How do you play it? 

They have 9 S between them. East cannot have four and with eight in W he would surely have bid, so sounds like 7-2. Opponents have nine major cards. Leaves just four in the minors. Let us find out if trumps break no worse than 3-1. With any minor voids they would have gone one more. Ruff AS. We need Club tricks, cash AC, lead a D to the AD. They both follow.  The danger is that I am forced in S if I draw trumps. If I keep East out of the lead the QS will stop the third round. Another C from Dummy. Time to look at the whole hand.

If E ruffs their Club trick vanishes, so he discards and the K wins and now I can exit with a Club and we are in control losing only to AH. 

Did I find this play which requires perfect timing?

NO

Comment
The NICKO, Minor Suit Slams and a Puzzle.

The NationalInter Club Knock Out is an EBU event and draws a huge entry. There is a Plate competition for first round losers, so you get at least two games. There is no reason why RAC cannot enter a team(s). My local club enters 4 teams and we played a strong Young Chelsea team in round one. We were offered pre-dealt boards from a box and Captains chose the set. 

There were no less than five clear slams in the 24! We scrambled home. I thought this the most interesting. B11 South deals, Love All.

The first decision, what do you open as South ? While it is 22 points, it’s all Aces and Kings. Change the Ks for QJs and see how it weakens the hand. I think it should be opened 2C or Benji 2D, 23 points unconditional game force. Let us assume an old Acol 2C. North has a choice, 2D, relay waiting, or 2NT 9+ balanced. Neither would be wrong. Let us assume 2D. We bid 2NT (23-25) and over this North bid 3C. We play this as Baron – 4 card suit upwards. The reason for this is that it greatly assists in finding minor suit slams in these situations. (If N responds 2NT then again 3C by the opener would be Baron) South 3H and  N bids 4C (must be five). South eschews NT and bids 6C. North can convert to NT if he wishes. 

Now the Christmas puzzle. Can you make it on a trump lead? Hint 6NT cannot be made.

Solution - the Nicko 6 Clubs 

I did not play this one I sat EW. Even with all four hands, it took me a while to see why Deep Finesse could make 6C but not 6NT. There are 11 tricks on top. Where is the 12th? My first thought was a squeeze but for that to work one hand must hold D.KQ and at least 4H. Unlikely of course. If West leads a D then we have the extra trick. But he surely leads a neutral trump. The clue is that a trump contract makes so there must be a way to make a sixth trump trick. 

Win AC in hand and cash AKS. Cross to dummy with QC and lead JD East must cover and win AD. Now play AH, cross to KH cash QS and discard D5 from hand. Exit with D to the 10 and Q. West with only spades and diamonds left is forced to lead one of them and concede a ruff by South and a discard of N losing H.   

Comment
Match v The Athenaeum 5- 12 -18

Smarting from last year’s defeat RAC overwhelmed Athenaeum. The match was effectively over in the first half where one team of four ran up +64imps. 

This board came up early in the second half a was the final nail in in their coffin. West deals Love All

Room 1 Ross opened 3NT (solid(sic!)minor nothing outside ) North passed and East responded

4C (pass or correct) this was passed out for N/S +200

Room 2 This time 3C was opened, North X and RAC played in 4H+2 for +680 and 12 imps 

Room 3 The bidding went the same way but Athenaeum sacrificed in 5CX -800 

Room 4. Colin /Tony an occasional partnership did not get the preempt. Athenaeum  opened 1C and 1D was overcalled and passed to South who decided on an Unassuming Cue Bid Of 3C (at least a good raise to 3D but with defensive tricks outside ) . Given that S is looking for the 11 trick game this must be an early slam try. North should now bid 3H but was concerned that it would not be construed as a cue bid. He therefore bid 4D (not minimum) South had one more go - 4S - now 5H - 6D for another 12 imp swing.

Comment
HOW - Overtricks count

We all know that defence wins pairs events because overtricks count. Take B13 on 6 Dec. 

The deal was: N Deals All Vul

Let us see all four hands. N opens 1NT(12-14) and this passed to West who knowing they had probably 20 points or less X in the protective seat. All pass. Now take the East cards what do you lead ? “Fourth best of longest and strongest” when did you learn that? 2D to the 8 and the rule of 11 tells West to play 10D. Any other card and Dec makes two D. He ducks and wins the KD. Desperate to establish S he crosses to AC (first cash the AS) and takes the finesse. Won by East. Who now knows the hand!. If Dec had K or QC he would have finessed so Partner has these. Dec obviously has S.AKJ plus AD so cannot have KH it would give him 15 points. Cash your two D and AH and put partner in with a C. The defence takes three D two C three H and QS for N/S + 800.

Look at the score sheet and see what actually happened.

Comment
Bridge on a Sunday Afternoon.

Members I hope will note that there is a game to be had on a Sunday Afternoon at Pall Mall 1415 start. Out of towners like me are not interested but inner residents I would encourage. The standard is not high but the atmosphere friendly. It is ideal for mentees who wish to improve. There is concern that if insufficient players attend it will die. Next date 27 Jan 2019. Board 16 caught my eye. West deals Vul.

The board was only played three times. But on two of those it was thrown in! After two passes East should open 1S. Only 11 points but they are AKA, so hopefully three defensive tricks. Look at the intermediates in Spades. Look too at the intermediates in West. This should persuade W that his hand with the crucial single 9D is worth 3S raise and East tries for game, Just Ruth and Sami Masri bid and made the game – well done. Come on members have go! 

Comment
The Curse of Scotland is it True?

The Nine of Diamonds has long carried this nickname. Rumours abound of its origin. Some say the Duke of Cumberland wrote the battle order “No Quarter” on the card before the slaughter of the cornered Clans at Culloden. Board 14 from Teams night 22 Nov. East deals Love All

Dealer passed and South opened a borderline 1S. West – 3C and North – 4C (splinter, good S raise C shortage)  - 4S and North who needed imps 6S. West took her AC and switched to …….the 9D. Losing to AD. Declarer could quickly count six S tricks, a Club ruff, 3 hearts and AD, 11 tricks. Where was the twelfth? Oh! for a third C, one less D, or JH. He ruffed a Club, high, and ran trumps from his own hand. The last five relevant cards are North H. AQ63 D.10 East H.10984 D.K South S.8 H.K5 D.86 .  South plays his last trump and throws 10D from dummy. East cannot keep all her H and the KD. The slam is of course defeated if West retains the Curse of Scotland.

 Maybe it’s sinister reputation is justified.

Comment
How many points did you have?

It seems that the most frequent opening question in any post mortem is “How many points did you have?”. It is usually the wrong question. One of my constant themes is that Aces, controls and shape are far more important. Which hand would you rather have? 

Axx Axx Axxx xxx or QJx QJx QJx QJx ? Obviously the three aces, but both hands have 12 points. This observation is critical in hand valuation. A dramatic example came up recently.

East deals Game all

East and South passed, West opened 1C (Weak NT) North X and E – 3C (bad raise) S -3S and W looking at his 3 Aces went - 4C hoping to push them to a game he might defeat. N -4S and East 5C nobody doubled. KS was lead. Declarer could see that the H suit must be established A and another D and a H to the Ace, S tried KC knowing it was dead and a further H put N on lead. He played 6C won with 8C a H was ruffed with JC. Draw trumps, Dummy high and claim. EW have 18 points and three Aces, NS 22 and one A. Dummy has 3 points but wins 8 tricks. 

Have I made my point?

Comment
Who is Sacrificing against Whom?

Another challenge hand from the training evening, the full deal was. 

North. Deals at Love All

With sight of all four hands it is clear that N/S can make 4H but E/W make 5C. The dreaded two game swing is possible. Absolute par is N/S – 100 in 5HX -1. At my table N - David Glass opened 1H (5card majors) and S, Andrew K bid 4C (splinter). The weakness of splinter is that it allows opponents to find a fit once you have announced shortage. I W doubled, and North - 4S. East Lester 5C - South - 5D (cue) and I doubled again, alerting Partner to the double minor suit fit. North, now a confident 6H, and East is at the crossroads. West must be 5-5 minors at least, is the QH valuable – possibly, could they be void in C? However he knows that a sacrifice must be cheap and took out the insurance with 7CX– 300. Lester was quick to apologise for taking a phantom.  I did not accept, pointed out that if the top trump honours are split the slam is made as the QH location is obvious, and the losing D goes on the 5th S. We did well to reach our game and losing 300 less than a game score was hardly that bad.

Another “match decider”!

Comment
The Interior Finesse.

The Bob &Roz Bowman Bowl was narrowly won by Marina and Terry by just one VP from Gordon Fox and George Donath. Marina is earning the soubriquet “invincible” after her recent MCC Teams triumph. 

Terry drew my attention to B15 from the first half.  The full deal was:                    

South deals N/S only Vulnerable.

Systems are variable here. Playing a 12-14NT S opens 1NT and N needs to find the best game I suggest 2H transfer – 2S – 3H (forcing 5-4) and S goes to the Spade game. The Board was played 15 times 6x4H, 7x4S and twice in 3NT (going off once on a D lead). The Spade game was made three times and the 4H only once.

The normal lead was a minor but twice the JH (more later). With the lead in North (4S) he can see that he has a certain H and C loser so needs to know how many H tricks are required. His first move is the S finesse – loses, now he can only afford one H loser. Draw trumps. With AC KH and his D suit East would probably have poked in 2D so he is most likely to be without KH. The only hope if that is so, is the “interior finesse”. The 2H to the 7H and 10H, win the return and go to the dummy with a trump. Lead QH pinning the JH for one loser.

Not so easy! 

Terry got the lead of JH and I chided him for his good luck. But he pointed out that he feared a H ruff if he took a losing trump finesse, and simply played AS and another, well foreseen.

Comment
Last but one board decides the Teams.

In the MCC Mixed Swiss  Teams the two leaders, Pralab Bara (1st) and Marina Channing Pearce met for the final match. This was the penultimate, Board 41.

N Deals EW only Vul

The Bidding: North opened 1C (could be short) and East bid a Michaels 2C (majors) South after long thought 3D & after 3S East went to game and the JD was lead. How do you play it?

Preliminary analysis: There is a myth that Master Players can see all four hands, this is rarely true and mostly unnecessary. However, this is one them! Count the points, South must have D.KQxxxxx. That leaves just 12 points and to justify his opening N must have S.QJ H.A D.J C.QJ. If S are 5 - 0 there is no hope, so assume 4-1. He must have at least 5/6 Clubs so when you win AD and would like to dispose of 4D from dummy on KC you know it will be ruffed. If N has 9/10 black cards the he must be short in H. There, you have the whole hand let us have a look.

Show whole hand.

The Play: Win AD and cash AS taking out S crucial 4S. Lead 4H and N takes his AH. He probably tries QC. You win and when S shows out you know the whole hand. Cash KC throw 4D, ruff a D and continue QH then 10H South covers (he may not) you ruff and lose two more trumps +650.What actually happened? The game went – 200 and in the other room they stayed out for +170 a loss of 9 Imps. Had the game been made +620 then they gain 10 Imps They lost the last match 20-0 VPs.  This would have changed the win round.

A very difficult but “match decider” puzzle.      

Comment
Victory for RAC at the MCC mixed teams.

On October 14 in the historic Long Room at Lords, the MCC held their annual Swiss Mixed teams 6 x7 board matches. Marina was invited to enter an RAC team, and MCC members Prelab Barua, Michael Bailey and Tony Scouller entered teams also.

Pralab, Brigitte, Andrew, and Geoff Lane lead for most of the way, but had to give way at the last to Marina, Terry, Paul Weston and Ross, 81 VP to 88. Congratulations to all eight players. My team were 5th= with 75VP.

This board B23 would have got us into the prize money.

S Deals at Game All 

I as S opened 1S and with opponents silent bid 2NT (Jacoby 12+ 4+ S fit) 3C (second suit not minimum shows 5-4 at least black) 3D (cue) and I nervous of my weak trumps waited with 3S partner took this as sign off and bid 4S so the slam was missed. Arun thought I should bid 3H (tell P what he does not know) I felt it costs nothing to bid 4C (ditto). 
I got the 6D lead. The safety play in trumps was routine. I can catch J10xx on the left but not on the right. QS and then the marked finesses. Our opponents stopped in 4S and missed the safety play.
Worse was to come when we examined the results. 33 out of 34 played in Spades. Eight played in 6S but only 4 made it, three others made +680. Twenty - six players missed the textbook safety play.    
   

 

Comment
Luck has the Last Word at the Café Bridge.

Quite pleased to win the enjoyable Café Bridge on 8 October. Last year we could not break 50% and this year scored 69.4%. We did have a lot of luck – of course. With three boards to play we changed to EW and looked at our score which was a short head up on David and Andrew. After an average, B17 NS, held these cards.

Dealer N Love all.

NS bid tried for a slam but found just one key in N and stopped in 5S. East lead AH, West dropped the JH. How do you play it?

Show all the hands.

Against us Declarer took the second H, cashed KQC and played Ace and another S. This lost to the KS but another C, gave East a ruff with JS - one down and 94% to EW.

How should it have been played? As N once you see dummy you know you are too high so you must make it. The AH has made and you have one certain trump loser, so the KS must be well placed. The D finesse must be right as well. Once you realise this it is easy. Win the KH, AS and another loses to the KS who probably returns JC, win the Q, draw trumps, overtake KC, cash the H and take the D finesse. 

Yes we were lucky!

 

Comment
Another Look at Match Decider Decides.

Here is another hand from the Olgiata training evening. Let us look at the whole hand. It was I think about the 6th Board we played.   

West deals Game All 

 

On the night only one person recognised it. It is the hand that decided the match v Lords Taverners. Listed under HOW 18/07 “Match Decider Decides”. It might be best to read that first.

Richard B however completely changed the dynamic, making West the dealer. Originally I had been East but this time was West, and opened the obvious 1D. What should N bid? All favoured 4H (which goes down). Richard asked why? He pointed out that with the KD a stop 3NT could make easily on that lead. If S had got SJXX it is unbeatable so do not rush! A bid of 2D from N would show the majors (Michaels) but what would 3D mean? Many experts play this one solid major and an invite to 3NT, not dissimilar to an opening 3NT bid. If S is not interested (he is 3NT!) he simply bids 3H and North - pass or correct. On the likely KC lead (S suit never mentioned) there are 9 tricks on top. 

But what if N does bid 4H, what does East do? I think X showing values is best. But is that your agreement? Many bid 4S, a real stab in the dark, makeable with K86 opposite; but kills the cold 6 Clubs. After a X I would have bid 5C but it is now very difficult to reach the slam.

Lots of food for thought and partnership discussion

 

Comment
Training for Olgiata

On 20th Sept Ross organised a session with Richard Bowdery for the Olgiata squad. This hand was one of many “match decider” deals.

B 6. East Deals Love All

 

My partner Lester (5 card Majors) passed as dealer. Richard endorsed this, and pointed out that if you open 1D you have no satisfactory rebid other than over a 1H response. How about a weak 2H now from S? He again said it is the 4th card in your suit that tells you its strength. This is too weak. So it was left to N to open with a 12-14 NT. East now doubled and S a transfer bid of 2D. As West I knew that we played 2C for both majors, so Lester must have S for his bid and a fit in at least one minor. Opponents must have a good H fit so I have a maximum - 3S not invitational bidding, to the level of fit. This has the effect of silencing N - pass - Lester (wrongly I think) raised to game. North could not resist a X. I got AH lead and N continued with 8D catching the KD. I drew two rounds of trumps establishing N winner but lead D until N ruffed but the fatal KC switch is too late. I draw the last trump and make 4D 5S and AC +590. 

Richard said this was played in the recent Crockford’s Cup finals, with very mixed results. Over his partners 1D, S poked in 1H and he decided not to make a negative X, missed the 4-4 S fit and compounded the error by leading the AD giving 4H. Of course Deep finesse always makes 4S even on a C switch. He leads 8S and if N does not cover runs it! If it is covered takes, QD and finesses the 6S! This made a lot of us more cheerful!

 

Comment
Damned if he does – or does not!

On 20 Sept this was B24. West deals Love All.

West, Lester passed and Andrew - 3H. With my huge hand all I needed for slam was a fit, but did we have one? I doubled. S who might have put more pressure on with 4H passed and W made the good bid of 3S. Back to me, of course this could have been made on three small and a minimum but I decided that a practical 6S was best. N lead AH, ruffed high (he kicked himself for establishing the KH but it made no difference) and Declarer drew trumps - much relieved at the 3-2 break. He leads 2D from dummy. If S puts up the K D it establishes the suit. Should he? My view is no, give partner the QC and it is vital. However if he ducks the KD the JD wins and when Declarer continues the suit he is forced to rely on C and as can be seen this works a treat for all 13 tricks. Only two pairs bid and made 6S, another 6C, Howard and Simone made 6D – did they take a first round finesse of the 9? One N/S went to 5HX - 800 for an average. 
Lively! 

 

Comment
Cue Bidding. Some Guidance.

At the end of August I played at Woodcote with Sally. Much enjoyed, Sally who knew everybody introduced me to opponents who greeted me warmly. I regret to report that for table manners we have something to learn at Pall Mall.

I made an instructive error on this hand. B16 of 27 August. W deals.

I opened 1D (playing strong NT) and Sally responded 1H  with silent opposition I raised to 2H and Sally with 5 losers and 2 Aces realised we had slam possibilities. She found the fine jump to 4C (must be the Ace and good trumps) I am minimum but have shown that already, against that standard my hand is good. Sally needs help in S but I was concerned that if I bid 4S she would assume it was the Ace S. I did not want to discourage her so bid 4D. Sally looked at the gaping hole in S but still tried 4NT and I replied 5D (one key), but Sally nervous about the S signed of in 5H.

As can be seen there is nothing in the play, draw trumps and knock out AS. I overlooked a simple point. Over a 4S bid, RKCB is still available. Sally has with her C cue bid said “I am good for 5H, how good are you?” She continues with 4NT and I reply 5D (one key). While she does not know if this is AS or AH, once I have shown Spade values she can bid the slam with confidence. Nobody advanced beyond 4H on the night but scant satisfaction.

 

Comment
Mentee Triumphs 6 September 2018

Another Mentor Night, partner Ivan Kerno with whom I have worked for the last couple of years. Now been told that I am in overtime and must change! We were pleased to win even after my hefty handicap, this, B21 was a contributor.

 

I opened 1C as N and opponents silent, we bid 1H – 2D (one round force 16+points) – 3NT (stops in the unbid suits, 11+points over the force) a good bid by Ivan. I am max, so thinking slam, but which minor suit does partner like? So – 4C (tell me more) Ivan went 4S (the key bid must show Ace after the NT bid). I bid 6C (correct please partner if you prefer D).

  1. I got the lead of 3D and this solved all my problems, when I knocked out the trump Ace. No point in trying for a ruff, you have one sure trick. For partner to get in and give you a ruff is remote, it just gives key info to Declarer.
  2. Suppose you lead 4H this just tells Dec that H are not 4-3. Partner cannot have a singleton
  3. The best lead I suggest is the 7S. This obliges Dec to take a first trick decision in the suit. If he declines the finesse, he goes down when H are 5-2 and the JD does not drop.

We were the only pair to bid the slam, and I was delighted to compliment Ivan on his excellent bids. 

  

 

Comment
Another Two Game Swing Hand.

B1 on 30 August was this hand North deals at Love all.

Looking at all four hands (oh for that privilege!) it can be seen that N/S have 4S and E/W 4H cold. So 5H/5D doubled  -1 for +100 N/S is absolute par. The board was played 8 times. 4H x2, once with an overtrick, 4D x 3 making +3 + 1 and just making, 5D x 2 going -1 and +1.  Finally 6C -2 (2nd top), the top EW was the 4H +1 and the top N/S the 5D-1. A little odd, do you not think?  Nobody played in Spades. 

We were the eccentric pair in 6C. We opened 2S (as did everybody) and S found the mysterious bid of 3C (good 6 suit, forcing, S tolerance) and West went 5D, North expecting the hand described – not of course what he actually holds   - 6C. Not doubled and two off V the cold 4H.  

 

Comment
“Sticks out like a sore thumb!” The Opening Lead.

In the sixties I played at the old London Club. Regular attendees were the twins Jim & Bob Sharples. They were of scrupulous ethics, conscious that they were always vulnerable to accusations of collusion. In ’63 they played in a high stake team game against the then American world champions. Sam Stayman was in the South seat. Jim was W with this hand:     

North deals at Game All.

West               North                East            South

                        1D                      Dbl            Redbl

2S                    Pass                   Pass           2NT

Pass                  3D                     Pass           3NT  

West doubled and all pass. What do you lead?

 

Show full hand

 

Jim reasoned that the opponents had 5/6 tricks in D, surely the KS and needed to get Bob on lead to break S. He lead the KC and as you can see they took the first 9 tricks +1400. Collusion was suspected but Sam’s team mate John Crawford (their best player) saved the situation, when he said “the lead sticks out like a sore thumb!”  

When on lead after competitive auctions consider doing the unexpected. 

 

Comment
Why did they not make all thirteen?

B 23 on 16 August: South Deals Game All.

There are 12 tricks in either H or NT. No pair bid the 6NT and two the 6H. Both made only 12. One pair stopped in 4H and made all. Note in the EW cards (31points) there is just one Q and no J, my old theme, the power of aces.

 A reasonable sequence playing a strong NT and Gerber might be: 1NT – 4C – 4NT – 6H. In that contract a trump is probably lead, Declarer immediately counts 12 top tricks and then says “can I make +1”. The only legitimate chance QJ dropping – is remote! So we look for squeeze chances. Draw trumps in 3 rounds (N discards one from each minor) and play AKS and a ruff (N another minor). We discover that N has only 3 major suit cards. With ten cards in the minors he will need to hold D.QJ9 and all the clubs higher than the 6 to be squeezed - not possible. So it has to be double squeeze where S is known to hold the S. Take the A and KD and play the fourth trump throwing 10D. South can throw 9S but is in trouble when the 5th H comes. Now he has to shed 4C. The 2S has served its purpose and goes. North now in sole charge of the minors has to unguard one of them. It is more fun if he lets clubs go. Then the showman in East can take the last trick with the two! 

The point here is that Declarer does not know what is going to happen but plays in hope rather than expectation   

 

Comment
Drama in the over Sixties Part 1

The EBU seniors event  60 + is great fun. Over 32 boards, national entry, and a repechage for first round losers, my team of 5 despite a first round loss got to the final 8 in 2017, losing to the eventual winners who went on to represent GB in the Europeans. The standard is quite high. We began our new campaign this week and got home by one IMP. On 5 boards 65 Imps changed hands! Obviously we did not get all of them right! But to repeat myself “match deciders” decide. After 24 boards we were down by 20. We agreed that we would not punt; feeling that we had no luck thus far, play naturally. After some quiet boards this was B 29.

Game all N deals silent opponents:

 

We bid 1C – 1S – 4D (the key bid, splinter, D shortage good raise to 4S). This opposite South D weakness boosts his hand and we continued 4NT (RKCB) – 5C (0-3 keys) an Ace is missing - 6S. A trump was lead and won, clubs were 3-3, it was over, missed in the other room +13.

 

Comment
Drama in the over Sixties Part 2

This was B30. Our opponents stopped in 3NT+3 on these cards. This time East deals at Love All. Opposition silent.

 

Our partners bid 1NT (12-14) – 3C (good suit, slam try) – 3D (cue bid, agrees Clubs, not minimum) - 4NT (RKCB) – 5H (2keys) - 6C. Thirteen tricks when the KD was right side. It began the same way in our room but, over 3C West bid 3H, the D weakness put off West, and they stayed in game.  The old rule, tell partner what he does not know. We gained another 9 Imps and the victory.

 

Comment
Tony S V Martin Hoffman 1975.

The weather is fine, Glorious Goodwood on the box, decided not to play this week, but HOW beckons. I wrote two months ago of the death of Martin Hoffman. I said that I encountered him in 1975, but did not elaborate. It was at the Eastbourne Autumn Congress. A hand was written up in the Daily Bulletin that I had played and gone down. I had played it card for card the same way up to trick 8 but then………

South played in 4S on the lead of 10H. Look at the whole hand:

 

South won the QH cashed the AH, crossed to AC discarded diamonds on KH and KC and lead towards KD losing to the AQD. He exited with 10D ruffed, and now it depends on losing only one trump trick. I lead the JS to the Q and A, continued with 7S covered by the 8 and had to lose to K6 for one down - in lots of company. Martin lead the 2S caught the QS but now lost only to the KS for his contract. How did he know, I thought, that the QS was single? I encountered the hand again in 1983 when he published it in his book. The answer is that he did not know! East still had the JH (10H denies), if West started with QX, when the JS loses to the KS East plays the JH, ruffed perforce by South and overruffed by QS. Martin realised that the QS or KS had to be single. 

 

Comment
Which do you prefer 13 points or 27 points?

One of my constant themes is hand valuation, the power of Aces, voids, shape and fit. More importantly the valuation of your hand can change during the auction as fresh information emerges. A dramatic example came at my local club recently.

South deals at Game all:

 

South has a marginal opening bid but the 6 suit and the aces decide him – 1D. West also borderline, X. North (who hates bidding on nothing), now or never, 2D. East does not know it, but by a long way has the best hand jumps to 3H and South values his hand again, Partner must be short in H and weak - 4D. Passed back to E who bids 5C! This tells S that any other values P has must be in S, - 5D and W could not resist the X. The AC lead was ruffed and an H lost to the J. The JD told Declarer that the KD was wrong, he, took his AD and established S with a ruff in hand. 5DX and made +750. Note EW are cold for 4NT. There is no defence 5D. When I was in NYC hustlers used to play “Attack or defend” and place a small wager on who was right. Well do you want 13 or 27 points?  

 

Comment
Match Decider – decides.

B 21 decided the match v the Lords Taverners. The full deal was.

North Deals N/S Vul.

This is a deadly teams deal. E/W can make 6C and 5S. Best defence takes 6H off -1100 (AKS AD and two ruffs) so absolute par, never happened, is EW +920, but what did?

R 1 RAC North opened 2C (8 playing tricks or unbalanced 20-22) -2D (relay) 3H (solid suit) and 4H from South. Long pause from West, allowed to make. RAC +620.

R 2 RAC E/W. North opened 1H and now EW joined in (1S) 2H (4S) 5H - P – P- X. E lead AS and switched to the 5D covered by the 8 and 9 for just +200. Team Blue gained 13 imps. 

R3. RAC N/S opened 2C S 2D (relay) and West -3C,  N -3H (mmm..) East Pass !!! S 4H passed back to East  - 5C and S doubled (+1)  RAC – 650.

R4. RAC E/W North opened 2D (either an unspecified suit 8 playing tricks or 20-22 balanced GF)  East came in with 2S (now or never)  – 3D (natural and positive ) West 4S and North 5H – P – P and after a long pause West declined further action. The AS was lead and Eat did not read the 6S from  his partner correctly, afraid to open the D suit he switched to 9C and N discarded QS. Declarer now lead three rounds of trumps ending in Dummy, lead 4D and West who now knows ever card put up the A. RAC – 650, again and -16 imps which decided the match. 

Comment: Where to start? First of all I think that it is actively misleading to open with a GF on the North hand because it contain NO defensive tricks, my sympathy lies with S in R3 with his disastrous X. I can see that N is reluctant to pre- empt Partner (so I would not criticise 1H), but at the vulnerability, 4H says I have 8 tricks playing in H. What could be clearer? After that West has to take his life in his hands with either X or 4NT. 

The LT West in R3 is to be congratulated, but who else? Notice also how the four different openings by N and the systems muddied the waters. I will not comment further on the defences, other than to say, watch the spots.    

 

Comment
Simultaneous Pairs 12 July 18.

We held this in aid of Kidney Research on the above. Won on the night by Marina and Terry who recorded 66% nationally and placed 11th at the time of writing. The hands were as usual challenging and exciting, none more so than B9. North deals, E/W only vulnerable.

I sat North and opened 1C –East a weak 2H and South has a choice of bids. X would be for TO but she decided to go 3D. West bid 3H and I decided to show 3S. With no further opposition bidding, South raised to 4S and I felt she must be 6-4 so with a double fit bid 6S. The 10c was lead. I won the AC and had to plan. If all goes well there are 6D tricks, four S, AC and two club ruffs: but given the nature of the event I feared bad breaks. If I trumps are 3-2 and D 2-1 then cash AKS and leave a trump outstanding (presumably the QS) looks the best plan.  When I play D I now have a cross ruff for home. Of course I now dropped the QS off side and played for the sure +980. This was worth 98% nationally. 
Marina bid 4H over 1C (next trick – going over Niagara Falls in a barrel) and went to 6HX -800 over the 6D bid. This was poor score as the slam is difficult to bid against vigorous pre- emption.  The booklet recommends 3H over 1C;  but at the score I think 2H (Weak) is enough, but go 4H as West over 3D.     
   

 

Comment
Sacrifices Sacrifices!

Last week I wrote about the ACF and two costly sacrifice bids. B5 on the 28-6- 18, I thought I would encourage a forensic look at it and hopefully draw lessons. This was the full deal; N deals, and is vul. 

 

Consider the possible play in isolation. N plays in some number of H and EW who have bid C lead 4C to the KC (N drops the 6C to obscure the count), W considers Dummy. He realises that C ruffs are essential for Dec and leads trumps. Dec wins in dummy and finesses 10D for entry back to hand. He unblocks AD ruffs a C cashes KD and discards his losing S ruffs his 2S, ruffs his last C, draws trumps and claims 12 tricks.  At pairs this would be very bad (West must take his AS when in) at teams or Rubber bridge the overtrick does not matter. So N/S always makes +650. At the table the bidding is likely to go: 1H – P – 1S – 2C- 4H and East to bid. The opponents have bid confidently to a vulnerable game, his Spades look poorly placed so his key assets are C.Qxxx and the H void. He looks to have no defensive values. Non V 5C-2 costs 300, well worth it. So he “sacrifices in 5C”. South now realises that his single 9C KD and HQJ6 are unknown to his partner and supports to 5H. West does have defensive tricks but expects nothing from his partner, so passes the decision to East. Let us do some arithmetic, they make +650 and their Partners go -300. That is -8imps, do we go one more? 6C-3 is -500 that would mean a net gain of 150 or 4Imps. Is it worth the risk? Suppose they cannot make 11tricks. We have all misplayed hands of lesser difficulty. Now we have the dreaded “phantom sacrifice” we go off v a contract they cannot make. Or worse still, you push them into a slam that makes. It only needs partner to be void in Clubs. 

Time to give up, and hope your 5C bid has done sufficient damage.

Final thoughts:

  1. If you are going to sacrifice after say 1H- 2C- 3H, bid 5C now, and put max pressure on both opponents, do not wait. 
  2. Avoid a sacrifice at game level or above if you have defensive tricks an Ace, or 4 trumps, or a well-placed K.
  3. Remember that shape and voids are more important than points. This applies to both sides!

So what happened on the night? We were allowed to play in 5C -2 not doubled for a top. 

 

Comment
RAC v The Automobile Club de France 2018

The Annual fixture was held in Paris and this year the RAC 8 won by 69 imps. Looking through the 40 (computer dealt) boards a number of thoughts occurred to me. Strangely the cards were skewed to N/S, there were very few “match deciders” ie. two game hands and only three slams, one very obvious early. Few were genuinely competitive.

In training we emphasised the need to avoid obvious mistakes - the reasons for past losses – doubling them into game, failure to bid slams, doubling slams. It was good to note that none of these stuck out in the results. However the most important one – “avoid large penalties” was not observed. There were 1100 and 1700 losses by each of the two teams (names withheld), incurred in ridiculous sacrifices. ACF made no errors of this type and these losses could/ should have cost us the cups which in one case they did. 

There were useful lessons here. B36 West deals at Game all.

This brought some swings. It seems to me that the North hand with it’s 6-4 shape and top honours in the long suit is just worth a one bid rather than a strong weak 2H. Then East will overcall 1S. What should S bid? I suggest a TOX is best leaving all options open.          W scrapes up 2S and N must repeat -3H. South should resist the temptation to go 3NT and bid the heart game. When the opponents have bid and supported a suit you surely need a double stop. Change the H and S holdings in S and now 3NT is cold. North always makes 4H but S goes down on a Club10 lead, which might occur on a transfer sequence. In the main match one pair went down in 3NT and another did not bid game.

Any way well done all, for bringing the Cup back.

 

Comment
The Splinter Bid

The Splinter Bid – Another Elite Training Hand.The Splinter bid was popularised by Dorothy Hayden Truscott of the USA from about 1963 onwards. Its function is to be descriptive when raising partner’s suit. Example: Partner opens 1H, a treble jump to 3S or 4C says “I have a game raise in your suit and a shortage in the jump suit (singleton, void or lone A)” This is more informative than a straight 4H raise.

This hand came up in training: East deals and is vulnerable. 

East passed, N/S silent throughout, and West opened 1S. What should East bid? 

Clearly he wants to raise his partner’s suit. Count his losers, 2S, 3H, 1D and 2C adds up to 8 so the first thought is 3S. However the Losing Trick Count points out that where you have a fifth trump you can deduct a loser for trump control. If you do that, a direct raise to 4S is appropriate. But a raise to 4D is more informative. It is unusual to use the bid when you have initially passed, it is not top of mind. After 4D West too counts only 5 losers, knows he is in the slam zone and can bid it directly. At the time the hand was bid 1S-3S- 4S and the slam was missed. Of course 7S is there with trumps 1-1 but should not be bid.

Comment
What have I NOT told my partner?

I have for some time been working as coach with the Elite Circle four from the business houses league. The hands are randomly dealt by Nicole and we delete the uninteresting. The Team are told simply that “both sides have chances”. This one gave problems. 

NS vulnerable North deals:

 

Let’s look at the whole hand. We see that 6C is solid, but will N/S bid it? What happened? North opened (12-14 NT) and East decided to take advantage of the vulnerability and risk a 2C (Landy for majors – a bit more length is usual). This leaves S with a headache. He doubled (penalty) and West 2S. North  -  Pass (minimum limit bid) –E Pass and South now 3D (must now be two suited minors) – W - 3S –N  Pass (again) and so did East. 4C by South passed to North. The key moment, she has shown a minimum opener and passed twice in the teeth of the opposition bidding, and a partner who has not given up and is vulnerable. He will be expecting minor suit support from N with the opposition bidding. But what does he NOT know? Once you ask yourself this question a bid of 4H sticks out. This says “partner I have AH and minor suits support, take your suit choice”. In practice a simple 5C emerged and the slam was missed. This was disappointing for me after a very good auction by both pairs up till then.   

 

Comment
The Ernest Lawson Bowl 7 May.

The above event was played with only mentor/mentees eligible to win. This turned out to be half the field. The bowl was won by Ann Catchpole and Stuart Carroll with a good score of 59%.

They were I suspect surprised to find they were the only pair to bid the cold 6H on these hands. Well done.

B 6:

 

We sat out this board but it seemed to me that an effective sequence might be, playing 2C as a game force:

2C - 3D (positive good suit at least AQJxx) – 3H (my suit) – 3S (not a minimum positive, and S values) 4NT (RKCB) – 5D (one key) -6H  losing only to the AS. 

One experienced pair found the following astonishing auction. 2C – game force or balanced 20-22)- 2D (relay – why? how wonderful to hold an Ace and two Kings opposite a GF) 2H (at least 8 playing tricks with H as trumps) – 2S !!!???(“I wanted to know more about his hand”) Your job is to tell him about yours! 3S (support) - 4 H. passed out. East has shown an absolute minimum with something like S.J10xxxx H.xx D.xxx C.xx. 

Ouch.

 

Comment
Martin Hoffman RIP

Martin Hoffman died in his sleep on the 18 May. I first encountered him at the Eastbourne Congress in ’75. Martin was renowned for his speed of play. He was able to make decisions in one second which would take lesser mortals at least 10. This in Pairs play gave him a huge advantage, any split second hesitation by opponents would enable him to diagnose the reason and place the cards accordingly. 

He wrote many books, and they all had one thing in common, not for him the complex endgame or squeeze, no rather a middle game play that required far sight. He was of course entirely capable of the former.

In a problem of over choice I liked this from Pairs play: South deals.

 

Martin opened a strong NT and his partner went for the top pairs slot in 6NT. The 8C was lead and Martin realised immediately that 6D was cold but now the QC is wrong and he has only 11 tricks. The only hope is to endplay East. Does it matter which red suit you cash first? Make your mind up before revealing the full hand.

Show full deal

The key point is to try and ensure that if East has the KS he is unable to dispose of it. So play first the suit which he will have to discard early. Win KC and cash D ending in dummy, East throws 3S and 4C. Now lead a S to the Ace, if the KS is not thrown, East has to follow to four rounds of H and has to give the JC when in with the KS.  Just five cards will have been played in no more than 10 seconds.     

 

Comment
You know the hand at Trick Two. Can you get it right?

We held a practice for the team headed for Paris on 23 May. The original coach had to withdraw and I (AJS) was pressed in to service. The very first board, nobody in defence or attack got right.

North deals at Love All. Look at the full hand from the start.

 

There were four tables in play and not all bid 6H. If they did not they were directed to play there. Those that bid it usually bid 2H (weak) – 2NT (how good are you?) 3D (good suit lower point count) and S pushed on to the slam – well bid. All got the 4D lead. Look first at how this was planned by me. The lead should be recognised as a singleton, take AD (note the 7 from W) and try to draw trumps. On the KH West discards 2C and suddenly the hand is difficult. Declarer has 6 H tricks 4D and two black aces, but the D are blocked and if the QD is ducked he is stuck in dummy and if returns to his hand with ruff he can establish the D but has no way back to his hand. The solution is blindingly simple. As you draw trumps throw away the blocking KJD. Now when you have finished trumps, exit with 10D and claim. Nobody found this play.

Let us now move to the West seat. You too recognise the 4D as single. So Declarer has 5D he is 6-5 red and two black cards. Count his tricks as before. If he takes ten red winners that’s it, the QD must not win round three or he home. Some disappointing errors were made. I saw more than one West discard a D on the first trump (why keep C?) that meant he could not duck the JD. Another did not discard but won the third round. They will need to play better in Paris!   

 

Comment
Lester Pereira to the Rescue in Centenary Cup.

The renewal of the Centenary Cup was held at Pall Mall on the 14 May. It was won by the Reform with +95 imps from RAC Blue with +75. It was a joy to note that Woodcote entered a team for the first time. As happens with teams of 8 there were some wild swings, as clubs find their quality varies with the numbers!
None more so than B6 RAC Blue v Lansdowne.  EW only vul.  East deals and passes. This was the hand:

 

South (Tony S) decided to open 4S at the vulnerability (on reflection, the hand has so many possibilities, I think a simple 1S is better), with silent opponents North has a major problem and decided on 4NT (RKCB) South who usually play 0-3 1-4 keys remembered they were playing 14-30 but distracted did not show the QS and bid 5H a disappointed Lester fearing two trump losers signed off in 5S. Now I realised that I had misled Partner, and with added values in Clubs went to 6S. This was too much for West, who was on lead, who doubled. Sir Galahad  (Lester) realised that the wheels were off and went 7D. Not doubled. The KH was lead and Lester, routinely won AH drew trumps, finessed in clubs and took the ruffing finesse in S, discarding his two H losers for +1440. Nobody else bid the Grand surprise! West cursed his greedy X.
 Do not double slams!!  

 

Comment
Playing in Minor Suit Games at Pairs.

The Ace as everybody knows is the most powerful card in the pack. It is a first round control and can always win the first round of a suit if lead.

This was demonstrated by B8 of the 10 May. The full hand - North Deals – was:

 

At one table, North playing a weak NT opened 1D and South bid a Baron 2NT showing 10+ points at least 4D and at unlimited. I confess that I would have invented a 1H bid with an eye on 3NT. North, an awkward decision, chose to bid 5D, passed out. At pairs playing in 5 of a minor by - passing 3NT (cold for +490) is often a losing strategy, so I would have bid 6D because of the three Aces. On a Spade lead to QS and KS Declarer counts 5D, and two tricks in each of three suits, eleven. The H finesse is the twelfth, but there is no need to take it! North draws trumps, knocks out the AC, back on play, cashes the AS noting the fall of the 9S, returns to the KH and runs D. He knows that East must keep JS so when he plays last trump East has to let go 2H and the Q appears, when he leads to AJH, so there is no guess. This play more common than you think is called a “show up squeeze”. 

 

Comment
After The Lord Mayor’s Show comes the……….

Last week I wrote about Sally and Paul’s triumph in the Café Pairs. Paul also sent me this tricky hand where they fell below the high standard they showed in the event.  Let us look at the NS hands only first. S deals EW only vul. B19

Looking at the NS only it is clear that 6S is optimum. How should it be bid? I suggest 1S – 2C – (deliberately leaving maximum space), South suit is not good enough for 3S and with the H weakness 3NT unattractive so simply bids 2S. N – 3D (game force) – 3H (4th suit) -3S. N has bid two minors, supported Spades, must be short in H. So S can reasonably bid 6S or simply 4C, if he does that, N must cue bid 4H and S does the rest. However P&S wound up in 6C by N and got the lead of the AH. How do you play it? Decide before opening the full hand.

Show all four 

You ruff the lead in N and realise that there are plenty of tricks if the minors break. However if the trumps are not breaking 3-3 the hand collapses. So the assumption that they are must be made. If the Spades break, or if the finesse works, then you have tricks to burn. So lead a S immediately to the ACE if nothing happens draw trumps and if West does not start with SK and another honour you are home.  Of course playing in 6S you make the same safety play willingly giving up one trump trick but not two. On the day nobody bid and made a slam. Three players went off in 6S  

 

Comment
Paul and Sally win the Wandsworth Café Bridge.

I am delighted to report that Sally and Paul Found won the Wandsworth Café Bridge. They have sent me two hands from their triumph and I will be reporting on them. B9 North deals EW vul.

NS silent and Sally opened 1H. Paul 2C and – 2NT (15-17). Leading at the time Paul, felt they needed a good board to win - versus  dangerous competitors - (Sally Brock and Brian Callaghan), should now bid the safest slam 6C, which is cold. However he greedily went for the maximum in 6NT. The KH is lead and you are in Sally’s seat to play the hand.  Make up your mind before exposing the full deal.

Show full deal

Sally made no mistake. She won the AH and cashed the clubs throwing her three H and a Diamond, North was clearly in agony and forced to reduce to his 4 spades and AD. Put in with Ace D he was powerless to defeat the slam. Well played Sally and well bid.

 

Comment
Bridge at the Carlton.

On a Monday once a month the Carlton Club runs a pairs competition. An early two course dinner with a glass of wine is followed with a Pairs competition. I much enjoyed playing with my friend Richard on 26 March. The most interesting hand I thought was B1. N deals at Love all.

 

North opened a weak 2S and South responded 2NT (how good are you?) 3H (close to a maximum) - 4NT (RKCB) 5H (two keys). Now South knows that there are 6 trump tricks, 3 Hearts and two minor suit Aces and on the old rule that where there are 11 there must be 12, went to 6S. We got the KD lead. Well the 11 are clear! So it comes down to how to play the clubs. First eliminate the side suits. AD, AH, KH throw the D, ruff the 8H (no overuff danger) Go to AS, QS, cash the H,  throw a club, ruff JD Now how do we play the clubs, and from which hand do we want to lead? If the West hand has KQ9 then we cannot succeed; but if East has that he can be end played. The early play suggests, 3-3 break, thus the most likely holding is split honours. I have agonised over this for some time and think it best to start with a low club from North. If East has KQX he is dead, with three to either honour he must play low, not so easy with KXX. In practice declarer decided to lead JC from dummy and when covered finessed the 8 on the way back for success. Three players failed to make the slam.      

 

 

Comment
The Game is Called CONTRACT Bridge.

It means of course that you only receive that for which you contract - or bid. Rules favour the Contractor, who has advantages, the blind lead from opponents, and when dummy goes down knows his total assets. This makes Defence the most demanding part of the game. In teams you must strive to defeat Declarer, risking overtricks if necessary. At Pairs just 10 aggregate points could make you a hero or a zero, often very difficult. B4 on 5/4, West deals, Game All.

You West playing Teams, open 1H and this is passed to South who bids 2S, raised to 4S and you lead AH to the 5, 4, and Q. Now you see Dummy, what next? Make your decision before exposing the full hand.

 

SHOW all four now.

 

Declarer must have 6 Spades surely KQ high, if he has four clubs headed by the Ace then his last one can be ruffed for his tenth trick, so we must assume he does not. Now count his tricks, 6S, KH, he needs three more. The QC looks an attractive switch until you see the pesky 10C on the table. Now if you lead it and S has only AX the 10C finesse again gives him his 10th trick. What about D? S has shown us only 7 major suit points so must for his bid have at least 7/8 points in the minors. We have now assumed him to have AC. Yes he could have all missing 11, in which case the KD lead concedes an overtrick. However this is Teams and the only hope left is KD, AD and a D ruff. At pairs it is much more risky, and nobody found this defence on the night.

Study this reasoning, a combination of assumption, observation, deduction but most importantly imagination.

 

Comment
A Tough Break on Mentor Night.

April 5 was Mentor night so the bridge was mixed in quality! Perhaps none more so than B17, N deals and passes, Love All.

We will look at the deal in full.

 

The Mentor East opened 1D and the bidding continued – 2C – 2D (not good enough for 2S) and West bid 4NT (RKCB) – 5C (0-3 keys). West inexplicably got cold feet and bid 5D (did he want the mentor to play the hand?). East now could not understand why having given a maximum response, his partner did not bid the slam. So went 6D anyway. The 3C was lead and E realised instantly that 6NT was cold. He simply must salvage 6D. AC, QD, KD revealed the 5-1 break. Ouch! Now there is only one hope and that is to play N for 4H and 5D. Cash the four H throwing a C and a S and then KC. North declined to ruff and both N and E throw S. AS, KS and another C forces N to ruff with 10D and declarer under ruffs! He now finesses the 9D for the slam. The board was played in 6NT +1 x 3 twice in 6NT one pair going -1 and twice in 6D once failing. Does anyone want to run the 6D for 13 tricks in D?

I am happy to answer any questions or rebuttals on HOW by E Mail. tonyscouller@btinternet.com

 

Comment
Room for (a lot of) Improvement!

The Circle should be concerned about the playing standard which now prevails. We used to defeat Olgiata and ACF regularly. I recently wrote about the Devonshire Cup. We have no team in the top leagues, no longer, most feared team on Pall Mall. The Committee is well aware of this and the regularly organised Masterclasses by Michael Byrne and Peter Mendelsohn have been well attended. But it comes down to the members. Do you want to improve! Evidence of current standards is shown dramatically by B24 from the team’s night 22/3. West deals at love all.

 

The board was played 8 times. 5 times in 3NT, three of those making with overtricks, and once only going down. 5C was bid twice, once making, and finally in 3C making. At one table the bidding was, North 1NT (15-17) South 3NT. 

Yes, it really was! 

Jim Duncan, East decided to look at dummy and lead AS, he saw the menacing D suit and played two more S. Declarer high and dry with QS banged out the clubs and W cashed out -1 the only defeat for N. Why? On H lead, N wins and plays Clubs W wins and plays another H.  Declarer now with 8 tricks has to lead S and lose 4 tricks in the majors. Very bad defence(s)!

 At many tables the bidding went, IC - 1D - 3C -3D - 3NT. Again bad bidding, why would your partner knowing that you have a long strong club suit persist with 3D? It can only be that he is totally one suited. In which case how do you as N enter his hand? 

Only Jim D emerges with any credit. 

Long way to go.

 

Comment
Pressure play and card reading.

The great player of the 50’s and 60’s Harrison Gray faced with a choice of plays would run the long suit. We know of the difficulties in defence when we have marginal values in three suits and have to discard. Gray always seemed to know the distribution and values of the opponents’ hands when he had cashed out. This reminded me. South dealt NS only Vulnerable B15 of 15th March.

East played in 3NT, after two passes N bid 1S. East 1NT was raised to game. North took time to pass the hand out. The lead was 6S (mud) to the 10, and East considered his plan. What is yours?            

Show all four now

 

North surely has five spades and the hesitation marks the AC. Eight red suit winners will see Declarer home. So for the JH finesse to win is a necessity. He takes AS at trick 3, plays AD unblocking the 8D, crosses to QD and wins the finesse of JH. Now a 3-3 H break will do. However when he cashes the KH the 10 falls, it looks unlikely. So like Gray he runs the D suit. N throws 10C and after thought the 5S. Now the hand is clear. N would throw a useless H if he could spare it, rather than a S winner, but clearly he dare not, so must have started with 5- 4 -2-2. Declarer, mindful of the pause, plays a Club to K and Ace. North can take his last winner but has to lead into A9H. Can the contract be beaten? Try a club lead to the 10C. North switches to S but this time East must win the second round preserving the 8S as a throw in card. The play goes the same way but North has to surrender two S winners, technique to put in the memory bank.

 

Comment
Card Reading by Declarer B23 MCC v RAC

In a tight match which RAC lost by 6 IMP this board would have opened a wider margin for either side. Look at the whole deal from the off.

 

At Game All N opened with a weak 2D. After two passes at my table East with an awkward hand decided to X. South remained silent, West bid 3H and was raised to 4H. How should West play? 

The bidding and early play have been quite informative. At the score N is likely to have a maximum and when he leads KS, knowing that dummy has Spades surely has at least KQJ. His D suit should not be better than K high so there are just four unknown cards. The trumps are likely to 4-1 with South long. Clubs could be 3-3 but more likely 4-2. Quite a clear picture emerges. 

.Now count your tricks 4 Aces and two more top clubs is six and surely four more trumps will give us game. So win AS cash AH (they are not 5-0, phew!) AC draws the 5 & 6 ruff a S. KC to 3&9 throw 3D, QC, 4D  then 4th C ruffed , AD ruff a S, ruff a D concede. Three Aces, three C, two S ruffs, one C ruff and one D ruff. At the other tables they played 3NT-1 or 3C making. It is a lesson that you should not pre-empt with a good 4 card major. Without the bid and lead West is surely going down

 Nobody made 4H on the night. 

 

Comment
How(ler) of the Week. Sim pairs 8 March.

RAC hosted a heat of the simultaneous pairs on behalf of the RNLI. Carla Sidney –Woollett & Marina (71.53%) and a scratch pair Nicole and David Metcalfe (70.42%) were 2nd and 3rd overall, many congratulations. The hands were as usual challenging. One player found B12 particularly so. N/S Vul.

 

West dealt and at the score decided to stretch to 3S. North bid 3NT and this was passed out. The 2S was lead (3rd&5th) and dummy played low. The QS won. What next? Decide before going on.

West reasoned that the 2S must be single and Declarer had bid on Jxxx. If the contract could be beaten, it must be in D so he switched to QD. With disastrous results. Show all. Declarer took, played AC, finessed the 10C, established the suit and made +630. As can be seen a simple S continuation leads to -1 but failure to do so a nationwide bottom.  The immortal S.J. Simon invented a character, the “Unlucky Expert” this is straight off the page! 

 

Comment
The Devonshire Cup – More Arithmetic.

The Devonshire Cup is our own event. We have won it many times but not recently. For those who do not know it’s unique rules, simple Rubber bridge systems only, are allowed, the boards are played simultaneously at two tables, teams of four, Rubber Bridge scoring, When a rubber is scored at any table, play ceases, aggregates agreed and a new rubber commences. This can throw up completely different tactical situations to those prevailing at duplicate. One reason for our poor showing is that nobody plays Rubber Bridge. David Manooch showed me this hand from a recent round.

 

South opened 2C (game force) and with silent opposition bid 2C – 2S – 3H – 4H- 4NT (old Blackwood) – 5D (one ace) 6H. Worth 180 + 700 – (2 game rubber bonus) and 750 (slam) 1630. In R2 West came in with 2D and East sacrificed at 7D. This doubled 5 down goes for 1100. Worse still after the AS lead an H switch enabled E/W to escape for 500. Very expensive, but even five off shows a good profit. At the vulnerability West intervention has little risk. Rubber bridge teaches this.  

  

 

Comment
Go one more !

The Elite Team in the B H League have been working with me, stand on the brink of promotion. I use a combination of random and selected hands and we critique them after each deal. The rules are teams, vulnerability as the board number. We try to play hands where both sides have opportunities, ie competitive, and possible ‘match deciders’. This one took some time in the post mortem. North deals and NS only are vulnerable. We will look at the whole hand. 

 

North typically opens 1S and at the vulnerability East goes 4D South 4S West 5D and the crucial decisions arise. N/S can make 5S (yes 3C lead and an under lead to KD after the AS can beat it with a C ruff) E/W can make 5D, provided E does not draw trumps but plays immediately on H. it is the dreaded two game swing.

 Let’s look at the arithmetic. N knows that if he X 5D it will cost 550, if it goes down one the gain to N/S will be another 50. 5SX will score +850 and if he goes down one loses 200 if doubled. The double gains only another 100. So the doubles for both sides are unattractive.

Suppose then N bids 5S gets doubled and loses 200 then finds that his partners have gone to 5D were doubled and also went down 100. That is a loss of 7 imps (300) but a two game doubled swing would be (850 +550) 16 imps. In the practice session both sides stopped in 5D but Declarer failed to play H immediately and went down. In the original deal played in my local club championship the two game swing did happen.  

So the lesser risk is to go one more.

      

 

Comment
Why was it so difficult?

Why was it so difficult? Ross has pointed out, that I bang on about our slam bidding. He is right of course, but others are not good too.Here is another hand from the Hurlingham Swiss Teams, Board 32 from the last match. West Deals and EW only are vulnerable.

 

After the Dealer passed North opened 1D East pre-empted to the full with 3S. South 4H – 4NT (RKCB) – 5H (two keys) – 6H completed the auction. On the lead of QS Declarer had 12 top tricks once the trumps broke. The board was played 24 times but the slam bid only twice. Many took the money in S or 4S X netting 500-800. Others took only the game bonus in H.North has an obvious opening and the key decision is S 4H bid. North places him with at least 6 headed by one or more top honour. On that assumption his QJ is gold. It comes down to hand valuation. East’s pre-empt is designed to shut out a H contract. So South’s bid is required.I ask again, why was it so difficult?

Comment
Michael Byrne Seminar 4th February

Michael Byrne Seminar 4 Feb.Michael Byrne gave a well-attended seminar to the Circle. This was much admired by his audience. I was particularly pleased that in his piece on safety play he mentioned my two combinations from LOLs and Mentor Night.His overall approach to his subject was one of common sense.

That said it is quite easy to get this example hand wrong:

South plays in 3NT after W has overcalled 2S. South wins QS and can see that 5 D tricks will see him home. With W holding 6 spades it is more likely any length in D will be with E so he crosses to AH and leads a D to his Q, when W shows out the suit will not run. Now playing Clubs will yield the 4 tricks needed and he makes his contract.

Comment
Extreme shape, extreme results!

Team Matches are decided most often, by which side handles the competitive situations best. Board 9 from mentor night on 1st February is an example. North deals and EW only are vulnerable.  We will look first at the whole hand. 

 

The points are divided 13- 27. The West hand with all four Aces looks big in defence. NS can make 4H losing three aces. EW can make only 5C as a D and S must be lost. The dreaded two game swing is a distinct possibility.

At teams once extreme shapes are shown you must beware of doubling too soon. Note 10 points in clubs are useless in defence. At teams the old principle applies “in doubt bid one more”.  Losing 100 in 5HX is cheap v 5C -600, but at pairs, it could be the difference between top and bottom. So at pairs how might it go? North at the vulnerability would surely bid 3H or even 4H. Let us assume the former. East at the score knows that his hand with a black suit fit could be great so the temptation to bid 4C is there. However there are two unknown hands to bid and he should pass. South now should increase the pressure with 4H and West will double. N has said his piece and leaves all to his partner, and East is in the hot seat. I think the same principle still applies. Extreme shapes can mean that 4H is a make and go 5C, passed to West. While he has the 4 aces he has 7 losers and knowing East has passed initially pass. Note how if East comes in over 3H surely the 6C could not be resisted?  

What actually happened? The board was played 10 times always in H! In 4H 5 times, in three cases doubled and made. Three times in 3H, once doubled, finally two NS sacrificed against the cold 5C and earned a shared bottom! Unlucky!

A match changing board, I think we can agree. 

 

Comment
Taken for a Ride by the LOLs

The LOL or Little Old Ladies are in Bridge folk lore. Perhaps immortalised by the famous defence by the late great Adam Meredith, “How should I know she was psyching? She had an enormous bag of knitting” In early January the Hurlingham club hosted its invitation Swiss teams. Well run in delightful surroundings, it started at 1000hrs, broke for a pleasant lunch, and finished at 1700hrs. RAC entered two teams, and my team began with an easy 20 -0 win. 

This was the first board of our next match, featuring two charming LOL. South dealt, passed and at Game all, opponents silent they bid:

1C (5 Card majors could be short) – 3NT – 4NT (old black) - 5S (3 aces) – 5NT – 6D (one King) 7NT .

A club was lead and when they broke 3-3 declarer cashed her 13 tricks for +2020. I make the Grand worse than 40% so should not be bid! Worse was to occur in Room 2. Our partners stopped in 6H, failed to make the safety play of 3H to the KH (nobody reads my columns) and lost two trumps. A loss of 20 imps, in a 6 Board match impossible to recover.

 We know how Meredith felt!

 

Comment
Plan your Defence

On 11 January this was the penultimate Board. North deals and they only are vulnerable. North opens with a 15-17 NT. With EW silent it continues: 2D (transfer) - 2H – 3S -4H – 4NT (RKCB) -5H (two keys) – 6H. Partner leads 9S. Dummy is exposed. 

Declarer wins the KS and leads the 5D from Dummy. Plan your defence.

Well did you win your AD? 

 

You have given the contract. You must play low. The AD sets up the KQD and he has 12 tricks. Let us work it out. Partner’s 9S shows that Declarer has QJ, Let us count Declarer’s tricks. Four spades, he has shown two keys, which must be AKH so five H tricks and AC makes 10. That accounts for 10 points in his hand. He has 5-7 more. If he has KC and KD that’s it, so we must assume that he has NOT got both cards. However if he has KQD you have given him the two tricks he needs. Play low and he is defeated.  

 

Comment
Do you double a game with 24 points?

This came up in a team game; East Deals and EW only are vulnerable. 

The full hand was:

 

Dealer passed and South opened an Acol 2C (game force) and W took his chance with 2H – Pass – 4H. What now? South felt she had little alternative to a double and this was passed out. On the 10D lead S won over the K and cashed AS and followed with AC (not best) another S was ruffed in dummy and the JH finessed. When it won Declarer threw S on the two minor suit winners, ruffed a C, ruffed a S and took another finesse for the game. Many S were left in 2NT only one pair bid the makeable 6DX but failed. The lesson for North is that shape and voids are very powerful opposite big point hands. 

A cautionary tale!

 

Comment
Mentor night

The first Thursday of the month has been designated Mentor night. On the 4th Jan some variable bridge was played! There are useful lessons to be learned from B5. Let us look at the complete hand. N deals and NS only are vulnerable.

 

At one table the Mentee opened 2NT (20/22) after two passes. The Mentor bid 3C (Stayman) and South unaccountably -3NT thinking this showed both majors. North did not know this and passed killing the hand. A defensive slip allowed S to make all the tricks for an undeserved 69%. The bidding should go 3C-3S (playing N for one four card major, if it is H over his 3NT continuation S can offer choice of suits with 4H). Now 5C cue bid and S can go 6S. One EW doubled.To give away the trump position and a top to NS. Without the X there is a safety play to lose only one trick in the S. Lead to the KS and the 2 from Dummy, if E shows out win the AS and lead another to the table. If E follows insert the 8. It’s fool proof.Look again at the opening bid. It has 22 points but all four aces. I would add a point and open 2C (game force) now 2D (relay ) 2NT (23-25) and North goes 6NT, or if you like go through Stayman as before.

Comment
“Let us now praise famous men, ………” Ecclesiasticus

In the New Year Break we have time to think about the game we play. Who might our heroes be? Terence Reese the writer, not the man, Benito Garozzo, of course, my third choice may surprise, Bob Hamman of the USA. We love our heroes in spite of their flaws, Churchill, Montgomery, Ian Botham. Why? Because it helps us to come to terms with our own limitations. BH sat East on this hand. West deals at Game all B52 and the world championship is on the line.

Dealer passed and North opened a natural 1D and East had a 2 suit overcall of 2D for the majors available. South 2H (good D and at least a limit raise) and West 4S, N 4NT and BH went 5S. Now South went 6C and N retreated to 6D. BH 6S and S 7D, which BH doubled. The World Cup is up for grabs, what do you lead?

Show full hand

Bob took a long time and lead AH, as can be seen only the AS defeats the Grand. In the other room the USA took +200 v 6S X -1

The hand is of course very famous. Bob himself points out that South could have cue bid 2S instead of 2H this was the key clue.

Yes the best get it wrong too!  

 

Comment
How could I tell?

We are in the Christmas break so I thought we might look for presents. In my opinion – and that of others more eminent – the must have book for all aspirants is Terence Reese “The Expert Game” first published in 1958 and available in paperback.  My 1975 copy autographed by His Eminence (first edition gone AWOL) opened on the first chapter entitled above. 

South played in 4S and supported H on the way. The 5C (4th best) was lead and won with AC and the JC fell from S. The KD won and the 7D followed, Declarer following with 6 and 8. On lead now what next? Do you have two tricks in both minors or just one in clubs and three in D? A cash out situation where we have all gone wrong. Make up your mind before you open the answer.

Show All Hands.

West thinks “I couldn’t bear it if he were to ruff the third D and throw losing C on the H” so tried the KC. Reese points out that if East has D.KQ10xx he would know that only two D tricks were possible and simply lead the QD and follow with a C. 59 years later this advice looks a little dated! Playing 3rd and 5th leads West 3C must be from 5 so East knows only one C trick is possible and simply continue with QD and another.

It was the Blue Team who brought in 3rd and 5th leads now you know why!

Comment
We must bid our slams.

I do keep on about it I know. But the circles big weakness remains slam bidding. On 30 November board 20 was a classic example. West dealt at game all. The full hand was:

 

6 H is cold, all 13 tricks are there in H on the repeated club finesse. The Board was played 8 times but the slam was bid only once, - by the Chairman and partner. Moreover 3 pairs failed to take 13 tricks. How should this be bid? Playing 5/4 card majors after three passes I see nothing wrong with 1H - 3H – 6H. So what is going wrong? It can only be poor hand valuation. South has a good 6 suit three primary controls (aces) and one secondary – D, maximum points (19) for a one bid, North a near maximum for his initial pass, four good trumps but one primary and one secondary control. A simple raise would be inadequate a double raise is appropriate. Notice that I have not emphasised point count but controls. The famous Blue Team (Marina’s idols) recognised this in their system geared to the big hands.

Which hand would you prefer?

 S.QJ6 H.QJ8 D.QJ9 C. QJ76

Or:

S. A654 H.A92 D.A65 C.1032

The first is not an opening bid. Yet both hands contain 12 points. The case rests.

 

Comment
The Nail in the Coffin.

Here is another hand from the Sim Pairs of 16 Nov. We did not know it at the time but it cost us a top three finish nationally.

B7 Game All Dealer South. Here is the full hand.

 

South passed and West (5card majors weak NT) opened 1NT. N doubled and East passed (natural). South had a long think and with no five card suit chose to pass. West took out to 2H and N doubled again East now bid 2S (they were not a regular partnership) overlooking the point that with 5H and 4S his partner would open 1H. But what do I know? Neither N nor S can double and as can be seen 2S cannot be beaten, for a near bottom score nationally. 

Who is the villain here? Why North of course! If he simply passes 2H East will not take out and 2H- 2 costs 200 giving N/S a top three finish. North, not unreasonably, claimed that his real “mistake” was to sit down.  

 

Comment
Freak on Teams Night.

It was team’s night on the 23rd of November. There were 8 competing teams with a welcome injection of visitors. Board 12 an outrageous freak, produced 5 different results, and huge swings from the six teams. North/ South only were vulnerable and West the dealer.

 

Before we look at what actually happened let us analyse the possible results. Curiously the only makeable games are 4H by N/S which loses two trumps and AC, and 3NT by E/W loses only the four top S! Four S by N/S is destroyed by minor suit forces causing a complete loss of control and makes only 8 tricks. Five C by E/W also fails. Played by W they need to find the D ruff, which means taking the AS and an under lead to the JS and a D return.  

Marina and Paul for the winners were able to double 5S for +800. But their partners wound up in 6D not doubled but two down. Another pair played 5DX -2 for a 300 point loss. For the runners up Andrew and David went to 4HX +790. All West players opened 1D and N has the first key decision. He bid 2H which they play as strong (hands like N never play well in the short suit) and when this came back to him after S passed he went 4H. E could not resist X and as we have seen this cannot be beaten. Another table duplicated this result. N/S +790

Which brings us to my table, Brigitte opened 1D and N chose to X. I at this point was thinking 3NT so a simple 1H I thought would encourage my partner if she had some Spades. S bid 1S and W 2C. Now to my astonishment N bid 4NT. (I find this odd since the only cards he is interested in are Aces of H and C) however I took this at face value and assumed a gigantic S fit with at least 9 S between them and therefore a singleton or void for my partner. Partner sounds as though she is at least 5-5 but more likely 6-5 in the minors. In which case my three minor suit honours are gold. Opponents now cannot stop lower than 5S and what will I do then? I decided that I would make - them - guess at the 6 level immediately and bid 6C. This to my surprise was passed out. On the lead of AS S played the 3S (the JS!) and N counted just like me on Declarer having a singleton and switched fatally to KH. Plus 920 and 17 Imps to the team.

 

Comment
Children in Need.

On 16 November we hosted a Simultaneous Pairs event run nationwide for Children in Need. We raised £174. The cards were exciting as they usually are. Andrew Kisiel and Tony Scouller won locally N/S with 70% reduced to 65% but 30th place nationally. 

Board 9 was intriguing. North dealt and passed with only E/W vulnerable. Let us see the full deal.

 

South was wondering what to open when East says 1C. The booklet on the night recommends a Pass but despite misgivings I left all doors open with a TO X. Still wondering what happens if N jumps in S! West passed (personally I poke in 1S – now or never) and N jumped to 2H. South went 3C.North read this as (game in H secure tell me more) and bid 4H (I am better than I might be) and South went to the 6H. East lead AS and it was all over. When on lead V a slam and you think you can see one winner, worry about the SECOND winner so the lead is KD. I fact it matters not. To our surprise this was worth 75% locally but 95% nationally.

 

Comment
A Good Defence and a Poor False Card

A Good Defence and a Poor False Card: but just 10%.

Board 26 on 9th November was this: East dealt at Game All and after two passes West opened 1H – 2C – 2S and after 3C from S,thatbecame the final contract.

Let us look at the full deal.

 

Deep Finesse points out that NS -140 is the optimum result. This is possible because the S break and the H finesse wins, but that is againstthe odds so 3C has to be beaten. East begins with the AS and sees the 4S and the JS from N. now he knows that his partner has the Q but how many more? Moreover if he tries to cash out he has no further entry if Partner has only 2 of the suit. So he switched to a H and Partner’s Q won. On the QS continuation the 6S appears and now the poor discard of JS comes home to roost. West has either got Q4 or Q104 in both cases to overtake is right. A, S ruff and AH for one down. OK East can always get it right but note how much more ambiguous the 10 is.What happened on the score sheet? Four times NS went to 4C for -200 once 3S was made and once more 2NT by NS lost -100 for a tied bottom for EW +100.Cruel.

Comment
The 2-way finesse

They say that an “Expert” reckons to get a two way finesse right about 80% of the time. Board 15 on 2 November is instructive on this point. The first thought is simple – do not take the decision until you have maximised the information available.

West plays in 3NT. North (3rd and 5thleads) starts with an unfortunate 5S, to the J and Q. Declarer cannow count, 5C at least 2D, 2S and AH, ten tricks, but get the breaks and the finesses right and there are 13 tricks. What is your plan?

 

The D can wait, the H finesse is one way and if it loses then JH is good. It does lose and the 3S is returned. Now all the low spots inS are revealed so N has lead from 5. Win the AS and unblock the AH. Go to AC and cash JH. Now run the C. South throws a painless 10H suggesting they are 4-4, North,oneH and two S, Declarer D and a S. Now Souths hand must be2-4-4-. So D are 4-2 and it is 1-2 that the Q lies with the 4. Take the finesse for 12 tricks and all the match points on the night.

Comment
Play it Again Sam.

Some excellent bidding was followed by some bad card play by both sides on hand 23 from 12 October 2017. South dealt at game. Let’s look at the whole hand.

 

North - South bid 1D - 1S – 3S – 4NT – 5H (two keys) – 6S. West had doubled 5H so an obedient 8H was lead to the 10 and K. Declarer drew trumps in three rounds and lead 8D. East took her AD establishing the suit and it was over. 

Play it again Sam –Defence. When the D is lead East can see that if she puts up the Ace the suit is established. Partner can have JXX at best. Now it cannot be made if she ducks. 

Play it again Sam – Declarer, can see that she has five trumps one C a C ruff and two heart tricks. Therefore the D must be established. Win KH and immediately play 8D. As we have seen this must be ducked, the KD wins and now Declarer has no loser in the suit. Do not draw trumps. A cross - ruff brings home the slam

 

Comment
The Dodd’s Cup Disaster.

Past winners RAC Morgan were dumped out of the Dodd’s cup (KO Business houses league) in the first round by Buttons. This early Board was a major contributor. West deals at game all. 

 

In Room1, West for RAC opened a Multi- 2D (weak 2 in majors) North, thinking that the suit was H doubled (silent opposition) S jumped to 3H. North now 4D – 4H – 4NT (RKCB) 5D (one key) and North 5H. Finally South bid 6H. What do you lead as West? North has signed off in 5H but S has ignored him and continued, why? South knows something the rest of us do not what could it be? North’s lack of enthusiasm and 5H bid says there must be a missing Key so where could that be? Surely H and not knowing the composition of your Multi N has S so South must be short in that suit. The only hope is the unbid suit a club lead looks best. 

Open all four hands now.

AS can be seen this is the only lead (but not made) to defeat the contract. 

Worse was to transpire in R2. West for Buttons opened a Weak 2S. North decided to double and drew 4H from South. Now he decided to bid 6NT a unilateral decision which went -2 and - 17 imps. It is not an easy hand – a match decider. But in R2 I suggest over 4H – 5D – 5S – 6D. The only makeable slam. 

 

Comment
Watch the spots!

Many decades ago, I played against the late Nico Gardner fresh from the Europeans and battles with the Blue Team. He said “with the Italians every card means something”. I was reminded of this by Bd 9 in the team game on 28/09. North  deals and passes and East opens 3NT.  You are told this a solid minor with one honour card outside. In these situations the key is to look at dummy. So South begins with the AS and dummy is revealed.

 

As you can see this confirms that Declarer has long D. AH and another honour in his hand will yield 9 tricks. You are not a regular partnership and have agreed count and where possible attitude signals. AS draws 4, 5 and 8. What now? The missing cards are KJ3. Is the 8S a true card? If he had 83 he would not play 8 as it would help to build a stop with Dummy. With J8 he would be forced, but that means that P has K53 and he would play his lowest for count. It is possible E  has KJ8. Possibly with that in mind S tried AC and that drew J and 3C. The JC denies the QC so continuation can only establish the QC for the ninth trick. Only hope now is to continue with 10S.

The full deal was : click - Show all Hands -

This takes it one off. 

 

Comment

Many in the circle play a short club and five card majors to open. Like all systems it has its weaknesses. Bd 18 of 21/09 was tangled by two of our more experienced players.  Let us look at the whole hand:  NS only Vulnerable. 

 

After dealer passes is South worth an opening bid? My view is yes, while clearly borderline the points are in the long suits, the 10s, six losers, and the shape 3-5-1-4 tip me over. At the table he passed. North now opened 1S and found himself trapped over the response of 2H. Reluctant to rebid his S, he chose to pass. The easy 4S was missed. What can we learn from this? The old rule applies; do not open without knowing your rebid. Here you do not want to repeat the poor S suit so open 1D, now it goes 1D-1H- 1S- 2C (4th suit) 2S -4S. But what do you think of South? My father used to say “if you like partner’s suit say so”. What is the point of bidding two H? Here the knowledge that partner has five S points to an immediate raise to 3S and then game.

 If you are dealt  S.Q8432. H.K53 D. KJ C.A82 then a weak 1NT is best. If you are playing a 15-17 NT then 1C is best and a 1S or1NT rebid, awkward, but avoids that shaky S suit.  My basic point is: 

Do not with opening values bid a major just because you have 5 cards.

 

Comment
The Price of a Convention.

When a bid has an artificial meaning, by definition it loses its natural meaning, as in say, a 1C opening. Many players in the Circle favour 5 card majors, three weak twos (an opening weak 2D can be very obstructive) and an all-purpose game force 2C opener (method one – M1). This last creates problems as it is vulnerable to the pre-empt. The opener can find he is at the four level without having given his partner any clue as to where his strength(s) lie. Benjamin Acol differentiates between the 8 playing trick hand (2C) and the 23+ game force (2D). This method makes the big 2 suiter awkward and I have found it best to open at the one level unless a 2D (big) opener is justified. In M1 it is difficult to cope with an 8 playing trick Acol 2Bid. Also many pairs are unsure whether their 2C is a game force or not. Finally the multi 2D although less fashionable can be difficult to play against. I am prompted to write this by B22 of 14 Sept. 

 

Minor suit slams are always tricky at pairs because they bypass 3NT. Let us look first at the Dealers hand:

S.AKJ2 H.2 D.AQJ10987 C.5. Just 15 points but huge playing strength. What do you open; perhaps I should ask what are your methods? The hand is perfect for an old Acol 2D or a Benjamin 2C or better still perhaps a big 1C system. One pair (M1) take the view that opening 2C is too wide ranging, that the hand is unlikely to be passed out, and opens 1D. But after a 1H response what on earth do you rebid? What is partner’s hand? It was S.10764 H.1098 D.K2 C.AQ82. 

The Benjamin pair bid 2C – 2D (relay) 3D (big suit) and then the key bid – 4D – 4NT (RKCB) -5H (two keys) 6D. Another pair (mentor / mentee) opened 1D and got the response 1S. Desperate now she bid 4NT, got a one Ace reply and bid 6S – for top score when the QS was in the right place. Just these two pairs bid the slam. 

Well what are your methods?

 

Comment
How do you play it?

Terence Reese in one of his great books “Play these Hands with Me” points out that when considering how to play a hand when dummy goes down, you must first assess the known facts. If you are then short of a trick or two it may be necessary to make an assumption about how the opposing cards must be distributed. However those new assumptions have to be compatible with the known.

A good example was Board 11 of 7 September. Once South opens 1S (five cards) his partner with three aces but no shape, will not stop out of game. In fact two only bid game and the rest stopped in 3S but nobody made 10 tricks.  

The deal was: EW vulnerable S Deals. 

South dealt and went to 4S after the 5 card major opening and the 2H overcall. KH lead. 

How do you play it?

After the KH lead S can see that three losing red cards are the problem. Although she has 9 top tricks West 2H strongly suggests a good 6 suit and therefore a S shortage. In any event if there is a losing S then she is unlikely to make. So win the AH (you dare not duck) and play 3 rounds of D. If they are 3-3 then the last one is good and cannot be ruffed. East wins the third round and probably switches to 3S,  the 10 wins (Dec needs to be in hand) he ruffs the last D and finesses the JS, draws trumps and claims. 

If West has 6 hearts then East has only one and since you cannot afford to lose to QS the assumption must be made that it is in East. If the D are 4-2 then again the likely one with length is East. The success of the assumptions is based on knowledge.

Comment
The Circle’s Big Weakness – Slam bidding – Again I

On 7Sept it was again demonstrated that our slam bidding is awful. Cold Slams were available on B12 and B20. In each case they were bid only once, by the same pair.

B12 West deals and is not vulnerable.

After 3 passes East opens 1H (5cards) and West goes immediately to 4H.  5C (cue) 5D (cue, key bid ) 6H.

Comment
The Circle’s Big Weakness – Slam bidding – Again II

B20 West again deals at Game All.

West opens a weak NT and transfers with 2H (X by South)  – 2S and now 3C (black 2 suiter possible slam try)  4S (max and 4S) 4NT (RKCB) and 5H (must be two Aces and denies QS) – 6S. Despite the Trumps not breaking 2-2 there is no problem in the play. Note also that the X of 2H gives East the clue that his points are not in Hearts. 

Comment
Time to acknowledge fallibility.

I wrote recently in praise of my partner. Time now to own up personally to incompetence. This I hope will bring the balance which some people feel has been lacking in my columns!

B16 from 10 August 2017.  Look first at the NS hands alone. West deals and they only are vulnerable. 

West passed and my Partner playing 5card majors decided to leave maximum bidding space and opened 1D and over the 1S response bid 4C (splinter agrees S) S 4S (nothing new to say) and N went to 6S. The QC was lead how do you play it? Declarer counts 3H presumably 4S and two minor Aces. Split honours in D is 75%, and would surely provide the needed tricks so S won AC (throwing 10H) and ran 10D. Time to see all four hands. East ruffed and returned a trump. I somewhat rattled compounded my various errors by revoking and went down. How should it be played?  Ruff the Club with AS, play KJ S note the 4-1 break and draw trumps (discard 5D) You still have the AC for control and to your delight the 10D wins (if West covers you continue D and knock out the honour) and have to rely on the 10H. Not as simple as it looks without the revoke! All declarers in S went down except Paul Found. His West opened a weak 2D and alerted him to the D ruff!

Silence is golden.

Comment
In Praise of Partner. 10 August 2017.

It has been put to me that I perhaps am too often critical of partners and opponents. While I never name names the perceptive rapidly work out who they are!

So let me praise my partner of the 10 August, Lester Pereira. Just one pair bid the cold 6C slam on these cards B 3 on the night. Three of seven did not even reach game.

EW only vulnerable, E opened 1H (five card majors) in the 4th position after all had passed. He noted that a fit in either of his 5 card suits would put him in the slam zone, his shape, Aces and single D could be very powerful. The response of 2C gave him hope. Partner probably has not got a four card major, but may have 3 card heart support. How good are his clubs? He decided to leave maximum space for enlightenment with 2S (key bid). This was a game force, and shows 4-5 in the majors at that stage. West with his minimum can only bid 3D – 4th suit force, -  I have something in D, cannot help in either major, and not strong enough in D to bid 3NT. Now E bid 4C (club support) so West know that 2S was an advance cue bid, his QH looks valuable so – 4H is the bid. East -  4NT (RKCB). What is the agreed suit? West view was that it was H – 5C (4 or 0 keys).  East has the key decision. Partner surely has only doubletons in the majors, weak D so his strength must be decent clubs so he bid the slam. A good sequence, lead very much by East.  On a S lead E took the Ace, drew trumps (2-1) cashed the H, throwing JS and claimed. 

Comment
Rare Bird Sighted in Pall Mall

B.16 on the on the 17 August threw up the following deal. West Deals and is Vulnerable.

                Almost everybody bid to 6H on this and took the obvious 12 tricks. At one table the bidding went 1H (5 majors) and East who is thinking slam in H invents a game force of 3C to leave maximum space. The auction develops happily if the simple 3H (good suit must be 6 cards) rebid is used. It continues 4D (cue agrees H) -  4S (cue)  – 5H and West shows first round control with 6C (grand slam try  and I doubt that East would have resisted the 7H. In all probability the QC would be lead (as it was to 6H) and West knows where the AC resides. Declarer plays low and ruffs. It looks as though the only legitimate chance is QX in D. Watch!

He cashes three S and 5 trumps. The last 5 cards with W on lead are:

                             Immaterial

             S.----                                   S.-----

             H.32                                    H.----

             D.J97            S.----               D.AK6

             C.----            H.----               C.K10

                                 D.Q108

                                 C.A7

The 3H is lead and the 6D thrown, South has no good discard. Throw a C dummy wins the KD, ruffs down the AC, a D is no better. No need to bid 7H nobody made 13 tricks.

It is that rare bird the Ruffing Squeeze. 

Comment
A Second look at Mentee night of 3rd August 2017

One of the points I keep preaching to those I coach is “give information”. What information will assist partner? What can I tell him/her that might not be anticipated?

Board one from August 3 is a case in point.

North deals at love all.

After two passes S opened 1D – West X and N went 1NT. It continued (P) and 2S (P). N now bid 3D and S, passed, missing the obvious 3NT game. Who was at fault? First look at S – the Mentee. 2S is a game force so he must bid 3NT himself and pray for a club stop but should not be in that position. N the Mentor is most at fault, he should bid 3C. “I have already limited my hand, I was not good enough for 2C but there is where my values lie. Does that help you?” Signing off in D does not help at all.

South now bids the cold game in 3NT losing only to the three red honours.

Comment
Mentor - Mentee Night 3rd August 2017

Mentor – Mentee night 3 August 2017.  It was mentor night so the standardwas a little mixed. However no mentees were involved in this monstrosity!

B6 East deals and EW only are vulnerable.


 

East opened 1S and S bid 2S! (Michaels showing H and another suit not a psychic a “serious” bid) West bid 4S and N after thought X. 5D from S (mustshow his powerful second suit) and N converted to 5H. This went down two, but scant reward to EW for the cold spade game bid almost everywhere else. South’s bid is one of the worst I have ever seen. But who wants my opinion? As The Man says in the denouement of The Cincinnati Kid “It’s about doing the wrong thing at the right time”.

Comment
The Man Who Knew Too Much

Alfred Hitchcock was justifiably known as the master of suspense. Many of his films depend on the guilty secret. Our hero stumbles on information which he would be better off without. Some bridge hands are like that. I am well aware that one of my own weaknesses is to see the elephant trap that does not exist. Perhaps that was what happened to one of our better players on B8 from 27 July. W deals at Love All.For a change let’s see all four

Dealer opens 1S - Pass - 2D and South-TO X (H & C) Now W perhaps fearing a cheap sacrifice went precipitately to 5D. As can be seen 4S makes +1 easily. The AC was lead. S surveyed the dummy and decided his trick target was one more,the KH. A club ruff looked to be doing declarer’s work for him so JD. As can be seen there are umpteen ways home. Declarer has 5S, 2H (at least) 4D (that’s 11 tricks) and club ruffs. However it looks like trumps are 1-4, the H finesse surely loses and if trumps are drawn then Clubsare wide open. Moreover if he takes the H finesse immediately and the split 5-1 then H ruff puts him down. He decided to test the S. AS and KS on which S threw his innocent 10S! Now declarer thinks S is 2- 5- 1- 5, fears the H ruff and it is too late to revert to plan A -the Club ruffs. He can still get home by simply giving up an immediate H to the K but played AH and another. S made no mistake read his partners peter and gave the ruff. It is an instructive hand. What is the best line? I think win AD, cross to AH! Ruff a C,cash QD (discover the break) take AS draw trumps. Note how not giving the club ruff and dropping 10S preys on declarers mind.
 

Comment
One from the Cotton Cup.

Paul and I were soundly defeated in the first round of the Cotton Cup by Pralab Barua and Roy Ham, 4 rubbers to 2. We had our moments, this was one. Love all. West deals and passes.

You hold the unhappy S cards and after dealer passes Partner opens a Game force 2C. East comes in with 4S! What is your action?

The weakness of the big 2C is that you have no idea what partner holds. I gave this hand to several people and everybody tended to get busy. My view at the table was Pass – leave maximum space for Partner to describe his unknown hand. Partner doubles, so it sounds like a 23+ point hand, with no obvious long suit. Now what?  I bid 5H and was raised to 6H. The 9S was lead. 

This is what I saw. How do you play it?

In order to keep control if I had to surrender the lead I ruffed the S. With 2 S ruffs I have 11 tricks, but when I took the AH East showed out. What now? After lengthy thought I decided to finesse the 10D when that won to my relief I was able to ruff the S with KH and draw trumps conceding a final club trick.  

Comment
Slam Bidding – Again! Sim Pairs 13 July 2017

It has been pointed out before that a major weakness of the Circle is Slam Bidding. Why should this be?  I cite the following.

         1.      In pairs a concern, particularly with minor suit slams, by- passing 3NT.

         2.      Poor hand valuation. Failure to recognise that Aces, shape, and fit are the key to slams on lesser point count.

         3.      Rushing to early conclusions instead of describing their hands as accurately as possible.

Board 1 of the Sim pairs is an example. North deals at love all. 

Playing a weak NT East bids 1D and with silent opponents gets a 2C response. Now - 2NT (15-18/19 forcing) and West 3S. What does this mean? He has a good S suit but has chosen to bid C first that must be a long suit missing KQ or he would bid 1S. At least AJxxx but surely 6, otherwise why bother? It must be a slam try. Look again at the East hand. It is close to a maximum and has the priceless KQ C. Say so - 4C – 4D (cue bid, suit agreed) 4NT (RKCB) - 5C (0 or 3 must be aces!) 6NT. Not difficult, one would have thought but just one pair (David Glass and Lester P) bid the slam. On enquiry it transpires that a wooden 3NT over 3C or a jump to 3NT was the norm. One more point, change the QH for QD and 13 tricks are on top.  Work to be done.

Comment
Final Board Disaster

All of us have at some time been left in/ left partner in a 
cue bid. It happened on the last board played on the 6July. South dealt and EW only were  vulnerable.
S opened a weak 2S and W made a TO X. N raised to 3S. Your bid? After some thought E decided to X. This is known as a reciprocal X saying " I am not clear what to do for the best help me" With opponents now silent this goes back to partner who says 3NT. What does this mean and what now is your action?

At the table E passed and NS cashed their six S tricks and AH for + 300 and a top.
Ok let us consider E action. He has four S the oppos have 9 so partner is void. 
Your partner knows that if you had 4 cards in H you would have bid them. So he does not have a good H suit himself. Once you realise this then the meaning of 3NT must be pick a minor please?  Now how good is your hand ? Relatively good, certainly better than minimum. So surely 5C stands out. Yes the 3NT was an improvisation but the advantage of preemptive bids is to limit bidding space and pressure opponents. 
 

Comment
RAC v ACF 2017 Board 39. A final Look.

Last week we noted that the match was lost by just 2 IMPS. However Ross Cope pointed out that our luck was out in the end. RAC started the final 10       at -23 imps. Although they did not know it, the team of 8 had pulled into the lead with +31 in the first 8 boards. This was B39. South deals at game all.

The bidding playing a weak NT for RAC probably went (opponents silent) 1NT – 2C (Stayman) – 2D (no major 4) and N knows he is close to a maximum with a good 5S suit and his points in the long suits  may well have tried with -3S. Opener with his maximum would go to game. At teams you must bid 38% games (both RAC pairs did so) and this is better. The ACF pairs stopped in 2S and gained +210 for the win. As can be seen with AH and KD offside there is no chance and both RAC pairs went down. Swap the EW hands over and it’s easy!

In discussion with Ross he asks are you allowed to check with your Captain  mid –session?  No. However if you are playing catch up in the last set, then you should estimate your score as you go along. If you think you have done enough with two boards to go, avoid the risky overcall, do not push to a dodgy slam risking a certain game, or an uncertain game as here. You cannot agree this with your Partner, if you do you must declare it to opponents.

Not our day.

 

Comment
Simon Cocheme 29 June 2017

My Partner on this night was Simon Cocheme, known to us all as a witty writer in the EBU Magazine. He paid us the compliment of wearing his England Blazer earned as Non - playing Captain of England. He sat West on B18 non vulnerable, with silent opponents. I as dealer opened 1C (natural) and Simon, held:

S. Q10 H.K9875432 D. void C.K 32.

He bid 1H and I responded 1S (surely5-4 a little better than minimum).He decided to bid 4H and after some thought I went 4NT (RKCB) – 5D (one key) and I signed off in 5H. Simon passed. On the AD lead Dummy showed:

S.AKJ8 H.A6 D.98 C.AJ965

As can be seen 7H is on with 2-1 trumps. Typically Simon was quick to acknowledge his error. Partner when he bids 4NT must be agreeing H (W has said his suit is self - supporting). East when he bid 5H must be disappointed at the one key response, in which case the D void must be crucial. He should bid 6D. Back to East, Partner has denied the second key but now bid D it can only be a void and E might bid the Grand. The only thing stopping him is the old rule, “never bid a Grand at pairs”. Only one pair bid the slam. David Glass playing with Andrew Kisiel on the same auction as us bid 6H for the top. Well done.

Comment
RAC v ACF 16 JUNE 2017

The Team of 8 match, was lost by a tantalising 2 IMPs. Almost anything by any pair can cost that!

However board 8 from the first set was particularly bad for RAC. West deals at Love All. You pick up as North:

S.AKJ

H.A.

D.AKQJ8

C.KQJ6      Yes 28 points! You are thinking what to open and dealer says 2H. You are told this means a weak 2 suiter any two suits. After thought you make a TO X. You have agreed to play Lebensohl – 2NT - in these situations and that is Partner’s response. This means, you must bid 3C and partner with one or both minors will correct to which he thinks best. Now you realise that you have not agreed continuation sequences with a big hand. 3C would not be forcing. What do you do?      Time to see the full hand.

At the table N decided on a bid of 4C and South with his yarborough passed. This went one off for a disastrous result with 6D cold, bid at every other table. The first lesson here is simple, when you sit down you must agree your defences in depth to opponents systems. So what do you do when you have not? You must find a bid that alerts partner you have a big hand. I suggest 3H. This can only mean “I have big hand, I have broken the system, give me more info?”  Partner now bids 4D and 6 D can be reached. NS have now incorporated this into their agreements.

Comment
HOW - 15 June

The Circle was entertaining the ACF for dinner on 15 June so there were only 7 tables for the weekly duplicate. Just one pair bid and made the slam on B13 and of those who played in 4 S only two made 12 tricks.

North dealt at Game All: Opponents  are silent. East close to a two bid opens 1 S , West says 2D and opener with 7 clear winners 3S. The key moment. If W bids a lazy 3NT that's it. He should ask: could my hand provide 5 tricks in combination? Once thinking in this way 4C (cue bid agrees S)  comes out - 4 D now they can get to 6S.
The play is also instructive. It is a lesson in combining chances. On H lead and a trump switch Declarer wins AS and counts his tricks. 6S 2D 2C and QH, that's 11. Obviously the C finesse would give the 12th. Alternatives? Well try crossing to 10S and ruffling a D. Draw trumps and cross to AC and when the QD drops under the KD Dummy has its 5 trick contribution.
On a trump lead it is even easier. Win in hand and cash AD, cross to 10S and throw KH on KD, ruff a D and draw trumps now just lose to the QC. Make 12 tricks and miss the slam is still worth 75% of the points .
 

Comment
HOW

Out of action recently so time now to show a new HOW. I have been working with the Elite team on defence and one of the thoughts I have been promulgating is, when defending, say 4S if you can see three tricks, do not necessarily rush to cash them until you have asked where the fourth is coming from. Like this hand:
South deals at Love All You are East.
The bidding - your Side silent, has gone : 1NT - weak - 2C - 2H - 4H and partner leads  3 D You are East
North Dummy 
S. AK H.J1098 D. QJ1098 C. AJ 
East has : S.10862 H. A52 D. A6542 C 3
So Partner has lead his singleton, expects you to read it, and give him a ruff. With 3 tricks now clear where is the setting trick? S drops KD.

While you have control in trumps, you must establish your own ruff.
Switch to 3C.
The full hand :
West S. 743 H. 43. D. 3 C. K1098765 
South.S. QJ95 H. KQ76 D. K7. C. Q42 
The play continues, Dummy wins the C and leads trumps. You take the A and give P his ruff with 2D ( McKenney for a C return ) and he gives you your C ruff.
If you do not make the switch at trick two  declarer is in control when AH is knocked out.
Yes easy when you see it, but would you miss it?

 

Comment
Déjà vu ?

Have you ever played the same board twice on the same night? It happened on the 18th May. There were complications with the movement and number of players, our long suffering Tournament Director – no criticism implied- was obliged to change the movement after we had played B 14. East deals – love all.

Look at the whole hand:

First I was East,  on both occasions the pairs were playing 4 card majors and a weak NT. Opponents were silent and we bid 1D -  2C – 2NT -3NT. QD lead and I counted my top tricks, AKS, AH, AKD and 6 Clubs. Where for one more? If the D are 3-3 then we have it with a duck, but it looks like S has four cards. What about a squeeze? If N has KH and S the proven D guard then neither can hold three S so a double squeeze works. Try it! I decided to try that line which meant duck the first D to rectify the count, S continued and AD won. Cash clubs and now everybody has discard problems. This is the position when the sixth Club is played.

  ♠  Q1043  
    109  
    -  
  ♣  -  
♠  A7   ♠  K95
  A2     Q
  8     A6
♣  6   ♣  -
  ♠  -  
    KJ87  
    109  
  ♣  -  

However N now erred, by throwing 9H leaving S in sole charge of the red suits, After AS and KS South has to surrender. NS -490 3NT+3 a score not matched that night. Well played? – no actually.

After the interval the board reappeared. This time I was North, we decided on silence at the time. They bid 1C - (why not 1D) - 1H  - 2H  (good raise to 3C at least) and I raised to 3H it is nigh on impossible to bid 3NT and they subsided in 5C. A heart was lead and run to the Q for +1. We spoke to the TD and she requested that we accept the second score. So our +490 never saw daylight.

So why not well played? One must never play this game with fixed ideas.  Assume a squeeze too early, win the first D and run clubs. Dec throws D2 and S5, S three S and three H now cash AS, KS. South is forced to throw D9. But now is end played when thrown in with DJ to come away from KH. Yes a squeeze but a strip squeeze.

Comment
Defence the most difficult

I have worked this year with the Elite league team on defence. I have recommended a drill. Listen (to the bidding) Observe (Dummy, the lead, the early play) Deduce (from the evidence) Assume (what is necessary).

A textbook example was Board 12 from April 27th. West dealt with only N-S Vul. N-S silent W opened 1C -1D – 1NT (15-17) - 3NT. Listen. The 2H was lead and this is what South saw. Observe.

 

Declarer took the KH and followed with the 5H. The 10C ran to the KC in North who continued with 3H. Won with AH and now lead JD to 6D 4D and your QD.

Your move:

Deduce. The 3H must be from Jxxx. If Dec had AJx he would have won in hand, so he started with H. AQx . If Partner had C. Kxx he would have ducked the K to restrict entries, so Dec holding is AQJxx. Seven tricks available and 14 points already! N shape must be 3442.The Q, J, and 10S, are the only cards unidentified. If Dec has QS 16 points, then when your AD is knocked out he has his 9th trick. Assume. N has got to have QS and W no more than S. J9. The 5S has now to be lead. This knocks out the KS and when the AD wins a further underlead to 10S brings in the suit.

 

On the night, three pairs made 1NT played by East and got 5S lead. One W only made 3NT when the S switch was not found and guessed the ending. 

Comment
The Centenary Cup 9th May 2017

This event for teams of 8 was elegantly hosted by the Reform club this year. Won by RAC Blue with +109 IMPs from Oxford and Cambridge +48 and Carlton +32 as noted on the site.

Perhaps the most dynamic hand was Board 15. South deals and his side only vulnerable. Let us look at the whole hand.

As can be seen E/W can make 6NT/H/C. N/S have 8tricks in S. The hand was played 18 times and 16 pairs played in either H or C game. One N/S pair was allowed to get out in 4S and another went off in 5H.

I was West, S opened 1S, and I have the first crucial decision. Somebody bid 3NT – not me! I thought a situation where I would at some point bid 5C  was likely, so why not leave space to gather info – 2C,  N  - 2S? Now -4H and S pass. Partner must be a good suit KQJ9xxx or similar. But what else? my KS is probably well placed but that is not certain, If  Partner  is wide open in D and void in C, my hand could be destroyed by D forces. Where then would his tricks come from? So I decided the safest game would be – 5C. Back to East, his Partner to take him out must have a huge C suit – despite his innocent first bid. East H are self-supporting so go one more. Once that decision is taken then why not bid 5D on the way? This key bid was not made, and E fearing two aces offside did not go on.

Nobody bid the slam

Comment
The power of Aces

On the 8th May, 16 of us headed for the Centenary Cup --- successfully recovered ---- attended a Coaching Session with Richard Boardman. The hands were sourced from actual play, challenging but not freakish.

I thought this, B9 intriguing: North dealt, E-W Vulnerable

N opened with 3C (when you look at a suit the 4th card tells you how good it is). East 3H, I was S and noted my three Aces and a singleton, realised that game was likely if a fit in S was there. I bid 3S (forcing) W - 4H and Partner 4S. Now E who has already bid his hand – all decisions are for his partner – 5H. At the score I doubled and took the money +500 better than everybody else who stopped in 5C/4S. However as can be seen a slam is on in either black suit. So East could claim success for his bid! If he passes, I have to envisage the sound C suit and the KS and count 12 tricks. The Coach suggested 4H over 3H, agrees C, and Partner has to see the importance of the KS and his maximum to get us there. Not easy

Ah well! The hand came from the USA trials for the Bermuda Bowl. One of the four top pairs got there. N pass, E did not pre- empt 1H.  Now they used the space 1S - (2H) - 3C – (3H) – 4H (cue) -6C.

Comment
Back to back Grand slams 2

B19. S deals E-W vulnerable. After three passes E opened 2C (game force).

West would like to make a positive but with such a bad suit simply went 2D. E 2H (good suit) and now 2S -3S (agree trumps) 4C (cue key bid ) 4NT (RKCB) and 5H known now to be 2 Aces. Now as E count the playing tricks, 4 H 2C and one D. Now does Partner have 5 or 6 S? My view is that partner with no top honours and E saying he is willing to play in H would not bid his suit with only 5 so 7S. Two pairs bid the Grand. We were on our own in 6S (10/14) but nobody else went beyond game. So 7S was worth only 2points more. So the old rule never bid a Grand in pairs still applies!

Today I say good bye to Casey Campbell who is off to New Zealand. He has been my computer expert and a tower of strength. Thanks and good luck. Welcome RogerWolf.  

Comment
Back to back Grand slams 1

On 27 April there were 5 clear slams in 30 Boards, two of them Grand.

Board 18. N-S only vulnerable. East Deals.

East opened 1D and S overcalled 1H, now 2C in our system would not be forcing so I fell back on a negative X. E with his strong hand read W for four S and went to game -4S. W knowing he had mislead his partner after long thought bid 6C, all pass and as can be seen 7NT is there. One other pair bid 6C all others just game for a shared top 13/14.

Comment
Why did nobody make it?

Board 3 0n the 13 April, throws up a number of recent themes. South dealt at Love all.

The board was played 7 times, two 3NT +3 and 5 in 6NT-1. I suspect the bidding went, 2C (game force) - 3C -3NT -6NT or similar. Those in game got a H lead and their problems were over. But why did nobody make the slam? Assume safe S lead and Declarer realises that with 11 top tricks – the Clubs must break. Even with their 32 points the slam is odds against. The lack of length in the minors, and intermediates makes it a poor bet. But we have made the bed….

The first move has to be to find an extra trick in D. Cash AD (Q could be single) and lead towards the JD. When the 9 is played Dcc ducks in dummy (could be QX) and East does best to overtake without a tremor and switch to JH. If he does not, it’s over when the C break. If he hesitates Dec can work out that D break and he is home. Points are not everything, length and intermediates matter, do not rush for the H finesse, combine your chances.

Comment
What do you need to open the bidding?

April 3 was a Mentor night and this hand provoked differences of opinion. West dealt at Love All.

West passed and playing 5 card majors, short C, and 15 – 17 NT. Do you open as North? Playing a Weak NT, yes fair enough. In the 1930’s Culbertson required 2&1/2 quick tricks (no). He also wanted two defensive tricks (no). Goren using point count and length, similar criteria (maybe). Alvin Roth with 5 card majors advocated “sound opening bids” (no). The Italians and Precision used a strong club -16 + and this enabled them to open lightest of all (not playing strong C). Losing trick count requires 7 losers only (no 8 losers). Latterly the “rule of twenty” is used. The addition of the two longest suits to the points must add to twenty (yes).

At the table 1C (could be short) was opened and East doubled S  - XX (1H would show 5)and North passed. This is misleading, 2C says “I have 5C at least, a minimum, and no defence”. East had a dip in the lucky bag with 4S! S looked at his two aces, a possible short club opposite and doubled. Declarer lost only the AKH + 690.

This debacle was not quite as costly as it should have been. Many  EW did not bid game so the X only cost about 20% of the Matchpoints. 

People ask me which of the methods listed “do I use”? I answer “none” not strictly true, I use all. Note that only rule of 20 says yes to the opening. Not me. Partnerships should discuss this issue at length. But at least you know now why I play 12-14 NT

Comment
Bidding three aces and three kings

On 30 March we had a worldwide Sims contest. Gitte  Hecht - Johansen our occasional and competent Tournament Director recruited Paul Mainwaring as a Partner, to avoid a sit out. They won on the night with 62%. Nationwide however they are in the top ten with 66%. For the scratch pair congratulations.

I like to think I made a contribution to the win with B1 on the night.
At love all, after two passes I pick up:

S. AK2 H. AK2 D.K75432 C.A

What do you bid? 21 points and 3 aces and 3 kings. The D is a six suit but is going nowhere without a fit. Oh for a 9 or a 10D!

I decided to underbid with 1D and drew 2D, what now? I could think of no method to ascertain Partners suitability. So ?

I decided to bid a direct 6D. Unique in my experience.
I got a S lead and Dummy was: S.Q64 H.Q54 D. Q86 C. 9654. I won in hand and lead a D to the winning Q - but the J came down on my right and when he  showed out on the continuation I spread my hand for one off.
Should the slam be bid ? A 2-2 trump break is 40%. There is one more chance a singleton
AD - provided you can make it beat air will add another 6/7 % so it is borderline at slightly below 50%. At the RAC +50 for N/S was worth 58%  (3NT also fails) to the winners but 72% nationally.

Comment
You are always in play!

It is the last board of a league match. Five Imps down at the half. Against the stronger pair, 2nd half you have done well, the size of the hoped for win is important. Love all - your hand.

S.753 H.87543 D.985 C.73 A Yarborough!  Ah, I can rest on this one. Dealer on left says 1NT and partner doubles. There goes the quiet life. Next opponent passes and you are told this means “happy to play it”. First thought is 2H my longest suit, but that surely, will draw a double. If they make 1NTX (you think they will) it is hardly the end of the world. Your move:

At the table N passed and S lead 4S. Dec took the AS and knocked out the AD. South thinking Dec had hearts (why did N not bid?) played another S and E claimed. As can be seen 2H makes. Worse still, it costs nothing to try AH and now when the J drops S cashes out for +300. In R2 N bid 2H over the X and they went one down when S raised.

The lesson is you cannot rest in any seat.

Comment
Never give up!

It was good to see Bob Bowman on the leader board on the 16 March. His partner David Glass sent me Board 18.

Against silent opponents the bidding was:

1D – 3D – 3H (reverse game force) 3NT and  S went 6NT. There is no need to leap. As can be seen the flexibility afforded in a D slam makes easily. I suggest 4C (cue bid, slam try) 4H – (must be shortage and KH) 4S (cue bid). Now 4NT (Roman Key Card Blackwood)  - 5D (one or four keys) – 6D.  Now two H ruffs makes.

However North has to play 6NT and was fortunate to get 4C lead. Ducked to the Q (rectifies the count) and 5S returned. Declarer can count only 11 tricks so the only hope is a H/C squeeze.

The end position after four rounds of D is:

North

S -

H K, 10

D 5

C J

East

H J, 9, 8

C K

South

H A, 7, 5, 2

 

North leads the 5D and East has no good discard at this point.

A passive S lead defeats the contract.

Bob and David were the only pair to bid and make a slam.

Never give up!

 

P.S. It has been put to me that sometimes I am less than clear or too technical. Anybody is free to contact me on: for further info: tonyscouller@hotmail.com

Comment
When did you last finesse an 8 to make your slam?

Devonshire Cup 1 March 2017. Two RAC teams Blue and Elite survive to the Semi –Finals of the Cup. Blue played old friends the Stock Exchange. In the second rubber at love all. East dealt and opened 1S.

Blue bid 1S – 2C – 3S and conscious of his three keys West decided on 4NT (old Black under the rules) – 5H two aces. - 6S. South chooses to lead the 5D. Declarer can count 7S tricks and three aces. Somehow two more have to be conjured and the only hope is D. He plays low to the K and wins AD. The rule of eleven (assuming the lead is from four) tells him that N has two cards higher than the 5D. Where is the 9D? KS, AC and a club ruff, and trumps are drawn. The 10D draws the QD and North’s crucial 7D. The club return is ruffed. Run the trumps and finesse 8D at trick 12.  Only a H lead defeats 6S.

Andrew was taken ill (fine now) on the day and Bob Bowman was called in. Bob has always been an effective rubber bridge exponent and his direct methods paid off in the second half. His partner opened 2NTand Bob with S.64 H.432 D.3 C.AKQJ543 went to 6NT (technically 4C Gerber is best) and 12 easy tricks were there. Neither slam was bid by SE.

 

Comment
Another Eight! The Devonshire Cup

RAC Blue had to concede their semi-final on 14 March. The computer and the unique rules threw up some fascinating challenges. After EW had won the first rubber in both matches the new rubber opened with this hand B6.

In the Cup, Room1 playing a Strong NT.  E opened 1S (what was he going to rebid?) and over S 2H West bid 4S, taken aback, N bid 5D – Pass – 5H (hard to envisage the 8 suit) and West with no defence to anything - 5S. N - 6H and E doubled. The defence blundered, and the contract made. In R2 and at all other tables, a weak NT was opened (at rubber bridge?) and again 2H bid. This makes it easier for W.

With his 11 black cards and lone Ace, the opponents must own the board. 4S is the bid. But at all other tables the bid was 2S. This enabled N to show his huge D suit with 4D – 4S – 5C (cue) 5S – 6D passed to West, after long thought went 6S and NS doubled and took +500, the par result. A similar auction in the Plate allowed one North to play 6D (cold of course) while in the other Room they passed out 5D. A match deciding board.

Comment
Virtue, as so often, is its own reward

The Sims pairs on 9 March with many unfamiliar partnerships produced some sloppy bidding and play. With plenty of choice, let’s look at B12. No names to protect the guilty.

West opened 1C (could be short) N doubles (Why?)  East, for whom a pre- emptive club raise would work well, has to pass. S bid 1S (surely 2S at least – you are supporting partner - that he has only one S is perhaps unfortunate).  West now tries to describe his hand with 3C, and N bids 4H (why not 3H, however 4H makes +1). At the score E chances 5C and N doubles. The singleton S is lead. Who needs a ruff with two sure tricks? Surely AK C and then the 4S is best? Declarer wins the KS on the 9 and 10. Lead a trump praying for 1-1, N takes and plays two rounds of  H, ruffed high and another C is followed by a third ruffed H. The position is: 

                                                     S….. ..                                                                               

                                                     H.J5

                     S.A2                         D. KJ1053                         S.J7

                     H…….                        C………                               H.10

                     D.A7                                                                 D.Q9

                     C.Q85                      S.Q85                                C.107

                                                    H.  ……..                            

                                                    D.6542

                                                    C………

Declarer now knows the entire hand shape – but who has the KD? It does not matter! If it is S then AD and another forces a spade lead or a ruff and discard, if it is N then it is he who has to give the ruff. So a club to dummy and the last H ruffed (only made possible by N) and two D plays gets him out for -300. No good, the shared bottom is 5H and worse still the match points (43%) are the same for -500.

Comment
Splinters and Pre-empts

A Splinter bid widely used today can be a useful tool. Typically in a double jump sequence: 1H – 4C, it means – at least four card support, a clear game raise and a singleton or void in Clubs.

My second point is that when you pre-empt, go to your limit and thereafter leave the decisions to your partner.

In turn as responder if you are always going to say 5H over their 4S go there now. These issues came up on B1, 23 Feb.

David Mannouch and  I sat S/N v Casey & Jenny Campbell. I opened 1H and David bid 2D. Casey bid 2S. (given his 11 black cards he should jump to 3) . Now I should bid 4C  - splinter but was concerned as David and I had never played before and 4C would not be recognised, So, after long thought, I went 4H and was allowed to play there. On a S lead,  ruffed, I lost two trump tricks for an undeserved 75%.

How should it go? After 1H-  P -  2D West should pre- empt with 3S. Now N has a problem as 4C is ambiguous. Nevertheless 4C and E is under pressure. It looks like a big red suit fit, so ask will I let them play 5D/C if you think the answer is no, 5S is the bid. Now it is likely that N/S will double for just +100.

Solution N must bid an unambiguous 5C leaving E with the horrible final decision over 6D.

Comment
Count Your Tricks - The Leagues

The circle has three teams in the five Divisions of the London Business Houses League. These are good fun. Home and Away, and the club subsidises our home matches for refreshments. The advantage is that with the 5 divisions you can find your level, and I would encourage beginners to enter. Speak to Marina if you wish to go in.

Unfortunately we are not doing well.  Morgan in Div. 2 and Rolls Royce in 3 are in the relegation zone and Elite in 5 are on the edge of promotion.

Morgan had defeated the lawyers Habeas Corpus at home 19-1 so they were thirsting for revenge in their home match. This effectively finished the match in their favour.

Dealer opened 1♠  and with silent opponents it went 2♣  – 2  -3♠  (P should be  5-5) 4  cue bid slam try, 4♠  -  4NT – 5  (one key)- 6♠ . Both teams bid the slam and, both went down, after a   lead to K and A.

Surprise!

The hand is an exercise in counting tricks. After the lead Dec has five ♠ , three   and two   two short. So something has to be utilised from dummy’s trumps.

The hand plays quite easily. AJD, AKH, ruff a H, try QD ruffed and overuffed. Continue with the red suit ruffs, making eight trumps and 4 red suit winners. 

Why was it not made?

Comment
Nine again!

Board 2 on 9 February featured another nine card suit.

What should E bid? He has nine clear winners so a two bid is a possibility. However No slam can be made unless West has two aces so I think at the score 4H is best. The hand was played 10 times 5x4H and 5x5H once doubled. All made 11 tricks. Not good!

Michael Byrne coached on high level decisions last Sunday here is an example. As can be seen 6D is cold. The South hand (unlike E) has three first round controls. It is powerful only if there is a fit. This is likely but in which suit? Most of us play a X here as two way. But second in hand is more likely to be TO than business. Now N has the problem. I think 5D is a must. With C wide open and a 5 loser hand it is not tempting to continue as S. West’s void surely now produces 5H back to S. The key point now is that E/W are saying “we have NO defence to 5D”. That thought should lead South with his controls to 6D. Not easy, but the decision that wins matches.

Comment
And the Gods Laughed!

Hand of the Week 6 Feb 2017. A mentor night so the Partnerships were not established and the skill level variable.

This B23 was our first.

The bidding started 1S – P – 2D  - 4H – and I went 4S – P and Partner went 5D, and 5H to me . Partner knows I have good S and have gone solo to game. In spite of that has preferred to go above me to 5D. This suit must be better than mine. My 104D must be valuable and so must AC. It costs nothing to cue bid 6C agreeing D. My partner after long thought passed! I felt the trapdoor open under me.

No! Six H on my right which I rapidly X. A rattled Declarer lost an extra trick for -800.

The board was played 11 times. Four pairs 5H, only doubled once all going down one. One pair bid 6D, (Andrew K and Mike Hill) made of course, one more stopped in 5D. Another, 6HX - 1, also 5S -2. Finally one pair doubled 5S. West lead his partners suit and Declarer ruffed lead to AC cashed the top S and got the bad news. Played to the D and continued throwing C. West declined to ruff and the contract made.

And the Gods laughed! 

Comment
Out and about - Swiss Teams 14 January 2017

The New Year kicked off with a Swiss Teams competition in the delightful Hurlingham premises. Twenty nine teams entered drawn from various clubs, and we started at the early hour of 1000 hrs.

We played 6X6 board matches scored as victory points out of 20. My own team finished in the middle. It might be amusing to look at why, and track my emotions. The cards were very lively with 9 possible slams there for the bidding; but no less than three of them came in the very first match. One of the frustrations of Swiss teams is that the match is usually decided by just one board. In our case the first six decided the event! Because we were playing in flights of six the boards did not arrive in sequence. I will also alter the polarity for printing reasons.

B3 our first (1) We were N/S

 West deals     S.KQ                 SJ86

                     H. AK854          H.62

                     D5                     D.A632

                     C.J10865            C.AK32

Against us they bid 1H – 2D - 2NT – 3NT and after a low S lead scored +630 (great, they had missed 6C) in the other room just 5C was bid.

B4 (2for us)

                     S.J9                   S.AK1082

                     H.J                    H.A5

                     D.AKQ54          D.87

                     C.AKQ95           C.J873

They bid 2C (game force, not good enough I think) 2S - 3C – 4NT – 5C            (3 keys) 6C. My reaction when dummy went down was. Opposite a 2C game force opener he has AKA and four trumps how can he stay out of 7C? This made +1 of course, but in the other room 6NT + 1was bid, only making because the D are 3-3. Oh dear! Only 3pairs bid the 7C and one other the horrible 7NT. One RAC pair bid 2C -2S – 3C -4C – 4NT – 5H – 7C crude but effective.

 

The next two boards were a routine 4H, and 4S missed by our team.

Then B1 (5 for us) we are dealt:

                     S.AK3               S.Q62

                     H.K7                 H.A83

                     D.A97               D.KJ52 

                     C.AJ762             C. 1095

I held the big hand and dealt. With three Aces, two Kings and a 5th Club I decided to up value it and bid 2NT (20-22) . Partner with similar emotions decide to raise to 4NT. Now I had to take the key decision. I thought they have missed a Grand and a Small we must be well ahead; clearly putting a cold game on the floor will not help. I decided to pass. While the club honours split only a backward finesse in D would have succeeded.

So much for my forecast we won 11- 9. Not a good start.

We redeemed ourselves late on with B34.

  Dealer          S.AK7               S.Q106

                     H.A954              H.6

                     D.KJ10953         D. Q2

                     C. Void              C.AKJ9642

We bid 1D – 2C – 2H – 2S (fourth suit, just repeating clubs gives no information) - 4D  (the key bid, must be 6-4 and very close to a 2 opener) now my three red cards must be good ones - 6D. On a trump lead and continuation West wins in dummy and must ruff a club. When they break 3-3 he is home. In practice we got a QH lead.

The event was well run and the entrance fee per person was £37 which included a two course lunch was great value. Played in the right spirit I only heard two calls for the Director all day. One from me when opponent owned up to a revoke costing an overtrick!

Comment

RAC Blue v Hurlingham Blue

The key lessons for Devonshire Cup are simple enough. Bid your slams and do not give away large penalties. RAC Blue (not at their best) defeated Hurlingham by 600+ aggregate points up 1300 pts at the half. However the penultimate board gave both sides the chance to change the result.

South dealt and passed and over the 1C opening, North 3S. East 6NT “I felt we needed something spectacular” she said. On the 10S lead to the QS declarer made the fine play of ducking “rectifying the count” The 3H was lead, she sensed the finesse was wrong and won. Now South can count her for 7C, 2D AH and AS. So the squeeze will operate when the clubs are run. However Declarer did not cash the AS before doing so and S could not now be squeezed.

In the other room N bid only one S over the club opener and E played in 6H. On the 10S lead looking at all four hands there are several ways home. But S had doubled 6H so caution is needed. The AS won and another S ruffed now a D to the Ace and JS ruffed on which S threw 9C. Declarer tried to come to hand with KC and lost two trumps. He kicked himself for not converting to 6NT. 

Comment
To the Cliff Edge

On January 20th, Board 23 presented all East /West pairs with problems.

Let’s give ourselves a look at the full hand to simplify matters. A privilege nobody else got!

This was played 12 times. For one pair silence was golden. They passed out 2S for +200 and a second top. Five pairs played a D part score and one went down. One pair climbed to 5C for poor board and the remainder in 3NT. We will concentrate on them. South opens 2S (borderline at the score). I was West, what one would want is to double fore penalties. So the golden pair's pass was an idea. I bid 3C and the inevitable 3D came. Now, I should pass but; 3NT with a S lead was tempting.

The 5S lead went to 10 and K. Now looking at all four hands it can be seen that if I cash another S and finesse the 10D there are 9 tricks. However I hate taking first round finesses (a weakness). Where are the Aces? South has opened with minimum values and a  lousy suit. So must have one but not both. Which? After long thought I lead to KD which wins. So North I thought has the AD. If it is doubleton then a low D takes the pot. Now I realise I should have cashed the second S. But I lead to KC to Ace – wrong again. KH came next, and the Ace wins. Another C to the 10 and J and another to South’s QC. Now she cannot cash AD so plays a H to N who wins and puts Dummy in with JH. Ace D lead puts South back on play with only S and has to give Declarer the rest for all the match points.

Lucky!

Comment
A Look Back to 2016

HOW contribution became a fixture this year. I would like to know what the readership thinks. It takes time for me and Nicole and if nobody reads it we should stop. I set a DD problem in December with a view to gleaning some information on this point. So far just 4 people have responded one of whom is not a Circle member and two got it wrong. Now maybe everybody is still recovering from the festivities or solved it easily, so I will not publish the solution yet, unless you write to me.

My favourite HOWs are:

The Lowly becomes the Mighty, Garrozzo, and Advent. What do you think?

On 5th January David Metcalfe and Yolande Glassman were the only pair to bid the cold 6C on B15.

I do not know their bidding but these are the hands and my suggested bidding. Dealer West.

                     S.KJ84                             S. AQ5

                     H.A                                  H.Q54

                     D.KJ64                            D.Q3

                     C.KQ109                         C.AJ876

I suggest 1D (suit below singleton) 2C  -- 2S (game force thinking about 3NT) --3H (fourth suit, more info partner please) -- 4C (bypasses 3NTso must be slam try, but most importantly shows 4144 or 4054 ) East can now see the importance of the QD, --4NT (RKCB) 5S (two keys and QC) so probably an Ace missing 6C. Easy enough one would think, but congrats to Yolande and David for getting there when nobody else did.

Comment
Slams –Again

Due to the late snow, only 7 tables. I too was a late withdrawal. However board 13 (often a swing hand at Game All) caught my eye.

Just two pairs bid the cold 6NT.

If you are playing a weak NT, N opens 1D and with opponents silent, it should go. 1D - 1H – 1NT (15-17). S can now see that his strength and length in H and aces and kings make him valuable. He now needs to alert N to his ambitions- 2S, North is not enthused by that but he too must recognise that the D length and the Aces give him close to a max - 3C. S surely now can bid the slam.

Some points in the play. Any S lead gives N 3 tricks in the suit - 12 top tricks. Played by S a C lead is likely and S will play for split honours 75%. Look at a neutral lead, say a H by either side. Declarer has 11 tricks. The odds on the D being 3-3 are worse than the D finesse 50%. So on any lead but a Club all 13 should be made.

Comment
1883

To cover the break between the ending of RAC Bridge and restart in 2017 here is a very old one. It dates from the days of Whist and was invented in 1883 by the editor of The Field magazine.

South is on lead, hearts are trumps, and makes all six tricks.

I will publish the answer in the New Year. For those going mad I will tell the answer if you write to me at tonyscouller@btinternet.com

Comment
Where. Is the ninth?

West played in 3NT after the opener’s 1H was overcalled 1S. S took two S tricks and W won the third. Declarer cashed four D and realised that two C tricks were needed but the finesse must be wrong.

Where my daughter asked is the ninth?

I pointed out that S is now known to have at least 8 black cards. So 4-2 H is likely, cash AKH and a third leaves N in to cash 9D but then has to put Dummy in for the rest. However I was critical of S who should duck the first S. Now contact between N/S is maintained - one down.

I wrote as much and went for a walk, slightly feeling I had missed something. Then it came to me. After the S duck, and conclusion that the KC is wrong, there is one hope left. Take AKH and exit with JS. S who has been forced to throw one S on the fourth  D can only cash the remainder and concede two C tricks. Yes he could quietly throw two clubs and hope Declarer goes wrong!

Yes it is always there!

Comment
Advent

This is the season when traditionally we are shriven for the good things to come. Hopefully the participating pair below will find confession helpful.

East dealt at Love All and opened 1S, passed to N who bid 2H. East 2S and S - 3H, East one more try with 3S again passed to N who doubled. S after an initial pass, H support freely bid saw no reason to disturb. South lead partners suit – 5H. Declarer took his Q, AH and a ruff and drew trumps for his contract. The only lead, a H, to give the contract was made, worse still the same unfavourable lie of the H in 3S X enables N/S to make 4H +1.

What can we learn from this fiasco? In the third position if you open light do not bid a suit that you do not want lead. The same applies in the protective seat. Weak major suits such as here or say QXXX are useless unless Partner has four plus an honour. Listen to the bidding. East knows his partner has nothing, but has continued to bid. S has after passing has voluntarily supported to the 3 level. East must be close to a 2 opener in S. A double will probably yield only +100 (a S or D lead and a H return is +300)

The H game is lucky of course but the protective bid on the N hand is X. East probably bids again and over 3D, N might bid 3H.

Never double on points alone.

Comment
Match Decider!

A friendly team of 8, against the Naval & Military threw up this hand in the second half. RAC held a narrow lead after 12 boards.

South was contemplating how to open his hand when N put the 3C card down! Curses! When were you last dealt 10 clear winners? The two RAC Souths decided to try an immediate 6S and N&M settled for game.

South got a trump lead and found the perfect dummy, win, ruff a D, ruff a C, draw trumps. In practice an automatic squeeze works when trumps are run throwing Clubs. West cannot keep all 4H and the AC. N/S +1010. The deal cost N&M 22 imps and the match won by RAC with +13.

Comment
Should you lead an Ace v a slam - number 2

Two weeks ago we looked at a hand where not leading an Ace was fatal. Now let us look where leading an Ace is also fatal.

West opened a weak 2 , N doubled and South could not be stopped short of 6♠ . After the  A lead West made, what seems like a good switch to  10.

Declarer can now counts his tricks, six spades, two diamonds, two clubs, and one heart - only eleven. The balanced North rules out a ruff, so only a stiff K or a squeeze can succeed. On the first two plays it looks like West has at least ten red cards so only the East hand can be squeezed. South must cash the diamonds and all the trumps to bring about this ending.

 
 
 
Q 7 2
A 8
 
N
W   E
S
 
K J
Q 10 6
 
5
A
K 7 4
       
       

South is on lead and has already taken the AH (Vienna coup perforce) now 5S throws 7H and East is dead, a text book positional squeeze.

Terry found the more challenging 9C switch. Now the D must be cashed first in Dummy after trumps are drawn, S throws 6H and 2C, on the D. Returns to hand. Now the KC (in red) has had to be taken early at trick two.  The AH is preserved for communication and the last trump (the text books again) delivers the criss-cross squeeze.

Deep Finesse says that the slam should not be bid. So how is it defeated?

 West must begin with JC, Declarer needs two D tricks so has to knock out the AD now a second C destroys the links for the squeeze(s). The 10 H is equally fatal. But the killing play for the defence is NOT to lead the AD which rectifies the count.

 

 

Comment
The Lightner Double

Last Thursday the Circle ran the Sim Pairs in aid of Children in Need. The hands as usual were exciting, with 5/6 in the slam zone. An unfamiliar partnership encountered this hand (B16), their last, on the night.

West opened the all-purpose game force of 2C. The problem with this convention is that it is vulnerable to the pre-empt. North grabbed his chance with 3D – East 3H and South 5D (-500 if doubled). West gambled 6S, passed to South who doubled. As North what do you lead?

This is a Lightner double. “A conventional X of this type excludes a trump, defenders suit, or an unbid suit. Requests a surprise lead and usually hopes to ruff the lead of a side suit or win two tricks in that suit”** A H lead defeats the Slam. An unfamiliar partnership drew the KD lead.

Several points here apart from, the pre-empts. East does best to pass 3D, leaving as much space as possible for his Partner. If he bids his suit partner will hope for at least one top honour. On the night 6S was bid three times once doubled and never defeated. The convention was invented by T Lightner of the old Culbertson team in 1929. Many members are not familiar with it.

**The Encyclopaedia of Bridge 1971.

Comment
Should you lead an Ace against a Slam?

RAC v ACF Board 24.

This was another costly board in this match.

West, the dealer on your right, opens with a strong 1NT, your side is silent and the bidding proceeds. 2H (transfer) 2S – 3H (5-4 in majors forcing) – 3S (likes that one) -4C (cue bid) -4D – 4NT (RKCB) – 5H (two keys)– 6S.

Your lead?

Dummy must be 5-4 majors or better, they have each cue bid a minor. Partner could have doubled 4C but did not. Given the knowledge on majors he cannot be void in D. Garozzo says lead your singleton when you have considered alternatives.

The 2C was led. For that to be right partner must have the AC- impossible he would have doubled - or an early trump trick to get on lead. You look at your 8XXX and realise that too is hopeless. So you try the AH.

The Ace of H draws a vigorous J from partner for - 1

Comment

The Annual match v The Automobile Club de France took place in Paris on 20 October. RAC lost by just one IMP, Irritating to say the least.

RAC got off to a bad start on Board 1

In the top match ACF played in 4H+1 +420 and 3NT +400. RAC played in 3NT, twice defeated on a Spade lead.

We always hope for a quiet start to a match so S could not have been pleased to pick up his 23 count. Assume a game force opening of 2C, after two passes, N responds with a relay 2D now 2NT showing 23-25 points and N bids a transfer 3D -3H and N offers the choice of games with 3NT. The key moment has arrived. S should recognise that the bidding has advertised the S weakness, and has a single stop in that suit. N must have a scattered 5/7 points and at least 5/6cards in H. Clearly point count is not the issue Spade stops are.    N could have bid with a little as H. JXXXXX in which case entries to the Dummy would also be a problem. While normally one would have 3 card support, to go 4H, the KQ are clearly vital and so 4H is the bid

The Spade lead was not found by RAC (in room2) and in both the other cases RAC did not go through the transfer sequence. It is worth noting that in the actual deal give N a sixth H and a slam is now cold. In our practice sessions we had stressed the need to describe your hand to your partner as best you can, and not take precipitate decisions.

An expensive Board spotting the ACF to a 20 IMP lead..

 

Comment
Partscores and extra matchpoints win Duplicates

We have had some spectacular deals lately but as we all know Pairs are lost or won in the partscores.
North has 7 HCP and counts partner for 15 HCP minimum. Leads 4th best diamond. Declarer plays  low and the
 K  wins.
South counts Dummy's points 5 HCP, LHO has a minimum of 12 HCP, North obviously has
 A so partner has at most four more points. Where can the six more tricks come from? If partner has club honours they will become winners anyway. Any South lead will surely establish a trick for Declarer.
So it must be Heart. Look at the
 8 in Dummy. If partner has Q10 bare it is crucial to lead the  9. Supposing partner has the  J? Then it is equally crucial. Lead the 9 and  Declarer will probably try the  10 which loses to the Jack. North returns the heart and South realises that two spade tricks are needed or one club trick. So South now underleads  the ♠ AJ and now the defence makes two diamonds, three hearts, and two spades for the magic + 200.
The kiss of death at pairs.
If you are going to make tight Doubles at Pairs you must defend carefully

Comment

There was a select entry on 20 October with many players abroad. It was good to see the mentees showing at the top of the leader board.

My eye was caught by this board which was universally played in 4  for E/W +620.

East vulnerable with his solid suit opens 3 or 4   and plays in game. South begins with top clubs and before playing to the third round. North must stop and think. My old theme, count Declarer's tricks.

At the  vulnerability East must have at least 7 good trumps and has also shown three clubs, so now has just three unknown cards. There are four tricks on the table so the K  is never going to win.

What hope is left?

Declarer cannot be beaten unless Partner can get a diamond ruff. So trump the trick and try a diamond!

Pedants (and Deep finesse) will note that it can go two down if North ruffs the second club and the third giving partner two ruffs.

Never give up and stay awake!

Comment
Cafe Style

The popular Café Bridge event was efficiently hosted this year by Naval and Military club over 30 boards. Forty pairs entered and it was won by Arun and I with 68%. Six RAC pairs were in the top10, and Sally and Paul Found recorded an excellent 4th with just over 60%.Board 2 was the most sensational.

Five pairs bid to the easy 6 , two to 6 one away, and three to 7 where only once did it not make.

Arun and I, playing the Benjamin system, opened 1 (two suiters are bad for the Benjamin method, leaves them vulnerable to the pre-empt)

After the 2  response North went the whole hog with 3♠ . Now 4♣  and West disliking both suits repeated 4 . Roman KeyCB 4NT (suit agreed  ) 5 , 2 keys +Q

A spade was lead, Declarer drew trumps and cashed diamonds from the top. +1510

Let us look next at why 6 is not making. East opened 2♣  as a game force and over 3♠  has no time to bid their hand out, settling in 6. The ♠ A  was lead and ruffed and Declarer needs to draw trumps. To get to hand the second round of clubs is ruffed, then over ruffed and another spade led. Nicely defended.

Can 7  be beaten? Yes - on a diamond lead declarer cannot enjoy all the diamond winners!

Can that lead be found?

Let us try.

East has shown at least 6 hearts and 5 clubs with values big, or maybe even more shape. West, despite knowing East has two big suits has shown a liking for neither and persisted with diamonds. East has enquired in diamonds and got the most positive answer, yet still persisted in hearts – they must be solid. North has bid 3♠  vulnerable so must have the Ace. Conclusion, if East has cards outside hearts and clubs - they are in diamonds not spades - so East must be void in spades – no hope there. Dummy must have very few hearts. So let us count the possible tricks seven hearts, three diamonds, surely AK of clubs. Thus it boils down to a trump to kill ruffs in Dummy, or a diamond. If there is only one trump in dummy then declarer cannot utilise it without cashing high clubs. So on balance a diamond might well be the best hope.

There is one final story worth telling. A couple of years ago, in this event, I put my partner into a grand slam. I held AKQ10 opposite his XXXX and he found J9XX over the 10 and this cost us the  win.

We agreed that we would never again bid a Grand Slam at pairs.

Comment
Garozzo

While working on hands I quite literally blundered into BBO and caught this hand live momentarily. I had to stop.
South dealt and showed a weak NT type of hand and N went quickly to 6NT which I noticed had gone off in the other room. On the lead of 8D Dec won the K and immediately finessed the QH (not the J so E dare not duck) E returned 6D . Dec won QD and cashed AJH, W threw a D . AS cashed, then AQ and a third C to dummy and W shed a S after a little thought.
Dec after minimal thought finessed the 10S .
The whole play taking less than 90 seconds.
Note how he explores all the options in turn, immediate H if it wins its over, cash H to get the count, then a club 3-3 break, that rules out a black suit squeeze as well. Then the inferential count. Note also the preservation of AD as a crucial entry back to the now blocked S. And the AS cash before the key decision.
It is so easy to tangle the entries in both hands
Who was North? Benito Garozzo of course.

Comment

West Playing 12-14 NT opens. East has a 15 point hand but most importantly three aces and one king. It is easy to construct hands opposite where black suit slams are cold. After the transfer 3♣  is natural and a game force. 3♠  indicates a minimum (typicallywith three spades). East tries again with 4♦, then signs off after 4 (I have that Ace) . Maximum exploration, but no slam, North leads 5 to the  2,  J and  K. It looks as though the  Q is in the right place, so Declarer counts, four spades three diamonds, one heart and two clubs for ten tricks. But can see those who did not explore the slams, and simply bid 3NT, have the same 10 tricks. Can declarer make eleven? If the clubs break, or if they do not can the last be ruffed in hand? This is pairs, so there is no trump safety play consideration - rely on the 64% 3-2 break. So ♠ A,♠K, ♣ K,♣A and a third club. South wins and tries a heart (good, so North has the QS). Take the  A, finesse  10, cash the  A, ruff the last club and concede to the ♠ Q.  420 scores only average. + 450 would be a top

Comment
The lowly become the mighty

It is not often that this lowly card changes events. Ross Cope organised an excellent training evening for those going to Paris for the ACF match.

He chose 16 challenging boards to test our "slam zone judgement ". None more so than Board 12.

At all tables West opened with 3D passed to S who has a horrible problem. He is conscious that 4S is cold and that any minus score will be bad for his side. At all tables 6S was played and KD lead. AD wins and S plans the play. As can be seen 12 tricks are there but no entry to Dummy! Eventually an idea came to him. If the 8S should be single then the 7S becomes the key entry, so he cashed the AS and noted the 6 and the 3. The percentages favour the 3-1 break and it is clear after the Preempt that it is more likely to be East.

Light dawned, cash the KS and exit with the 4S! When this hit the table there was a sharp intake of breath, particularly from Dummy!

East won the trick and played a H which ran to JH and it was all,over.

Could East have foreseen this? The clue lies in Declarers long hesitation at trick one.  He must have, say, 7 top S. AD and surely AH with three top clubs that makes 12, so why has he not put the hand down "drawing trumps"?

He must be void in Clubs. So first play, 5S then the 8S. Tough but worthy of  the highest praise.

Comment

NS only are vulnerable and N may if playing Three weak 2s open 2D.

East  has an obvious TOX and S has a choice. 2H would be forcing but even at the vulnerability perhaps at least 4D or I prefer 5D. Opponents surely have good S fit and if they go to 4S you will feel obliged to go to 5D anyway. This puts W in a horrible position.

One pair were allowed to play in 3 S and got the lead of KD followed by JH. Dec took the AH and ruffed a H to his own hand.

if you look at the trump suit in isolation the book play (76%) for four tricks in the suit is to take two finesses. However look what happens. The 10S loses to the K and the H return is ruffed and over-ruffed . The C switch is also ruffed holding  West to + 140 and an undeserved 80% of the match points.

After the first two leads N cannot hold both S honours, he would have 11 points so a simple AS and another scoops 11 tricks.

Count the points.

Comment
How's your declarer play this week?

South dealt and showed a weak NT type of hand and North went quickly to 6NT which I noticed had gone off in the other room. On the lead of 8  declarer won the King and immediately finessed the Q  (not the Jack so East dare not duck) East returned 6  . Declarer won Q and cashed AJ , West threw a diamond . A♠  cashed, then A,Q and a third club to dummy and West shed a spade after a little thought.
Declarer after minimal thought finessed the 10
.
The whole play taking less than 90 seconds.
Note how he explores all the options in turn, immediate heart if it wins it's over, cash heart to get the count, then a club 3-3 break, that rules out a black suit squeeze as well. Then the inferential count. Note also the preservation of A
  as a crucial entry back to the now blocked spades. And the A♠  cash before the key decision.
It is so easy to tangle the entries in both hands.


Who was North? Benito Garozzo of course.

Comment

Shirley and Roy handed us a zero on this board, bidding and making 5♣ .

Roy won the heart lead crossed to the A ran the ♣J,  ruffed the second heart, drew trumps and gave up a spade.

Routine? Apparently not. The hand was played 7 more times, 3 in minor suit part scores, once in 3NT by W(should go down ) and again by E (should make) and twice in 5  all going down.

The play in 5  is a book lesson, establish the side suit before drawing trumps. Whoever plays it on a heart lead, if Declarer draws trumps in three rounds ending in Dummy and takes the losing club finesse. The heart continuation leaves him without resource when the spade loses. The hand is more difficult than it looks, win the heart and immediately give up a club. Ruff the heart and play the ♠A and ♠Q. Ruff the third heart, cash KQ, cross to ♣ 10 and draw the last trump. Note that you cannot afford even one round of trumps before setting up the clubs.

In the Gentle Duplicate the two results were 3NT +2 and 5DX +550. Well someone can play the cards!

Comment

The cards on 11 August were not very lively so let us turn back to the 4th August. West deals and has a borderline strong two bid. On the night it was opened 1  . East with a choice bid 1♠ . Now the crucial decision, 3  does not do justice the strength of the hand. West needs to find a game force as so many options for game remain. He bid 3♣  inventive !

E raises to 4♣  and W to 4♠ . E sensing a double fit decides to bid 4NT - RKCB his partner has bid three suits so must be short in hearts. Now what is the agreed black suit ? If it is clubs then he has three keys, and if it is spades, only two. What are your agreements? After 5♣  - 3 keycards E bid   6♣  and a slightly nervous West converted to 6. Nothing to the play.

Easy enough surely, but only two pairs bid it .

Comment
How to make slam missing the AK trumps

Have you ever made a slam missing the top two trump honours?

On the 4th of August it was mentor night and 11 tables in play.

Board 1 provided much hilarity.

East opened 1♠  and West raised to 3♠ . We needed points after a careless start. So East bid 4NT - RKCB and got a 5  reply - one key. Of course this could be K♠  but seemed more likely to be A♠  after the double raise. In which case there are good chances that the slam would depend at worst on a finesse - 6♠ .

After a red suit lead Declarer played  a spade with spectacular results. They apologised  to their  unlucky opponents. The slam was also found by Sally Found and John Craggs by similar methods.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 

Comment

Ten teams played on Thursday 28 July. On Board 2, just pairs two bid the cold minor suit game. We were not one of them. All passed to North who opened 1  (playing 5 card majors 1  should make it easy) then 2♣  - 3♣. South despite a seven loser hand, looked at his "useless" majors and passed.

North should recognise with at least 24 points between the hands that 3NT is a distinct possibility. Give South one more spade and 3NT is cold. So North should bid 2 . South raises to 3  and when North supports to 4♣ , a singleton spade is advertised and South can bid 5♣ . Show where your strength lies.

Note from Nicole: 4441 shapes are notorious for their difficulty to judge how to bid accurately. Should one upgrade or downgrade a 15HCP 4441? Upgrade - easier to bid, but you might find yourself plying a level too high. Downgrade and you face an immediate problem for a rebid. How many of you have ever played inverted minors? The auction given alongside this week's hand offers an auction using a convention which inverts the meaning of 2♣ and 3♣. To find out more ask me about it - or follow this link.

 

Comment

The cards were lively on 21 July. None more so than on Board 3.

Both sides have exactly twenty points but the distribution for EW is very different.

Looking at all four hands it is obvious that EW have a cold 6C, and the par result for N/S is to lose -300 in a sacrifice of 6SX.

Not easy at the table and I suspect systems played a big part in the results. 2 x 6♣X, 2 x 5X, and five times N/S were allowed to play in spades. If South plays in spades it is less easy to find the diamond ruff. Two Declarers made 11 tricks in spades.

South passes and the first divergence may occur. We will assume (for now) that 2  is not played as weak, so West too passes.

North opens 1♠ . Now what sort of  jump overcalls are EW playing? Is 3♣  weak?  If it is weak then probably a simple 2♣  is best.

South - 4♠  and West with a miracle fit must consider 6♣  but probably just says 5♣ . North I think now does best to pass, not without defence, and at the score 5♠  is quite attractive.

Now West will surely bid 6♣  and North will not resist a double.

Go back to the beginning. Let West open the weak 2 . If North doubles South may well wind up playing the spade contract. If so, or calls 2♠  East must bid 3♣ . In your system is this constructive ?

Now South will either make a responsive double, or raise spades and the delicate decisions are as before. Is everybody clear on their agreements?

Comment

When you are third hand to play on your partners blind opening lead, you have a priceless advantage - you can see dummy. When it goes down I fold my cards and study. To evaluate partner's lead and plan.
South dealt and played in 4♠  (NS only vulnerable) after the auction shown. K♣  lead and East considers. In the visible two hands, there are 19 points. South cannot be worse than five good trumps. 
Count the tricks, 5 spades, 2 hearts, one diamond and surely a club ruff makes 9. You can see that if allowed to duck a heart, the suit will come in.

What to do?

You must act now. You need two clubs, one diamond and hopefully a heart. Overtake and switch to a diamond. Declarer wins, draws trumps, and must concede a club and a heart.

Can you wait for partner to continue clubs?
Watch! You win the second round and switch to diamonds. A desperate Declarer, takes A
 , draws trumps, ruffs a club, takes AK  and exits with Q  and W is end played.

Comment

As a rest from slams I offer the following defensive test. The Olgiata team had a training session and this hand caught out two of our better players.

Test yourself and listen to the bidding. South dealt and opened. East bid a daring 5C (goes - 200X) South now 5H. All pass.

The lead is QC, what is your plan?

I have been teaching “count declarers tricks”. N must have 7 trumps solid and since he showed no interest in a slam nothing outside. When your KD is knocked out he has three winners in the suit plus the AS. That makes 11tricks. What hope is there? A club trick is essential so you must win and switch to the JS playing Partner for the KS.

Comment
It's a working theme!

Slam bidding again. Astonishingly all six NS bid a slam, 6♣ , 6  and 6NT, two 6♣  and 6NT only were successful. As can be seen, the ♠ K and  K offside, and a 4-2 diamond break, should scupper any slam.

Should 6♣  be bid? Assuming N plays 6♣  a neutral trump lead is won in dummy and the losing spade finesse taken now a diamond finesse would render success. So yes the slam is slightly better than 50% and should be bid, although theoretically impossible to make as the cards lie.

What do you open on the big North hand?

Benjamin Acol, or all purpose 2♣ forces are bad for two suited minors, so I personally would suggest the given auction. After 3NT the crucial moment arises. At pairs North knows that  the NT game is likely, so to continue virtually commits to a minor suit slam. Why not! So 4♣  confirms the big two suiter and over the cue bid of 4♥* , North bids 6♣  offering the choice of slams.

4 is controversial - what would it mean for you? Do you think you have sufficient HCP and shape to really consider slam a possibility when partner only opens at the one level? 

Unlucky.

Comment
Splinter Stories

Let us return to slam bidding, the Circle's weakness.

Only one pair of four bid the cold 6♠  on this hand from the relaxed Sunday game, all of course made 12 tricks.

West deals and opens 1♠ , strong enough to rebid 3  over 2  if needed. East has great support for partner's suit and a seven loser hand - so knows game is secure. Moreover, has additionally two first round controls and a second round control in diamonds.

The best bid therefore is to splinter with 4 . "I have at least second round control in D, support to at least 4♠  and other values. " West delighted at this response has a 5 loser hand and knows he is going to try 6♠  at least. So 4NT (RKCB) which draws 5♠  (two keys and QS).

Now could the grand be on? Has anybody got the  A? So 6♣  (first round control) and East realises that the values in clubs are duplicated.

Enough 6♠ .

Comment
Freaks

The cards this Thursday were wild and none wilder than this. Freaks are never easy to bid and this more difficult than most.

North deals.With no-one vulnerable, the first key decision is whether to open. One of my pet hates is slavish adherence to the Rule of 20. The problem here is that a fit in either minor may lead to glory, but which? Is there a fit? Open 1C and you have killed the hand for your side. Moreover we are the dealer, so expressing both suits immediately cannot be done. So I think the best move is Pass. East now depending on system has a choice of bids.

1NT (15/17), 1H , or a minor suit opening. Simplest is the strong NT. Now when West transfers with 2  N can bid 4NT, which must mean, pick a minor. Over 1  - 4  the same bid can be made. Why go to 4NT? Because with your weird shape they are surely going to 4  and your side to at least 5 of a minor. And it is best to express the hand as quickly as possible then final decisions can be left to the unknown hand - South. Over 4NT Easts action depends on what he has opened. If NT then a pass to partner is best, enabling South to choose 5 . More difficult if the hand has not been limited. A double is tempting leading to 5 X + 1.

Par here is 6 X-3 or minus 500 with 6  a make.

Comment

♠ K  A  AKJ96543  KQ9

A coaching session was held recently with David Burn, useful and instructive.
He talked fleetingly about the opening bid of 4NT. Of course frequency is low. As luck would have it, this came up as Dealer in a LBH league match on 25 May. What do you open? In both rooms they opened 2
♣  ( this works fine if you play Ace responses - neither did ) then it went 2  (relay) - 3  - 3NT both teams ended in a NT game.

If you consider the hand, there is no way you will let go under 5 . Yes it is true that you are missing the Q . However if you ignore that, what you want from Partner is Aces.
So 4NT is the bid. Now 5
no ace, 5 that ace, 5 , 5, the same 5NT two aces, 6♣  that Ace
Partners hand 
J83 Q765 107  A432.
Easy.

Comment

All Circle members are EBU members. In the June edition two articles caught my eye. The first “Responding to Doubles” on page 36 has much to teach us all. The only thing I would add is – remember when responding that you are not bidding your suit you are supporting partner’s.

Of more technical interest is Neil Rosen's article on page 18 “Surround plays”. It reminded me of a hand from twelve years ago that Simon Cocheme of IBM drew to David Bird’s attention in the Evening Standard.

West for the RAC lead ♣ 9 to show lack of interest in the suit. Declarer won the ♣ Q and played a heart to the Q. East switched to a diamond, but only one card was good enough, the  Q. Declarer won his  K; but when he lead another heart, up went the Ace from West and over to the  A. When the  3 was returned Declarer’s 9-4 were nullified for one down.

These situations come up more often than you think – be awake!

Comment

NS 6♥; NS 6♣; NS 3N; NS 4♦; NS 1♠; Par +1400: EW 6♠×−6

RAC did not distinguish itself in slam bidding at the Centenary Cup as we saw last week. On this hand we fared no better. That said we were in good company – only two of 14 pairs bid the making slam(s) – 6♣ by the event winners.

At our table, the bidding was an uncontested  1♣  1♥ 2NT (19-20) 3NT. We led the ♠2. Declarer won and cashed top tricks resulting in 3NT one down. Our teammates did no better. This time the opening bid was 2NT - 3♣(Puppet Stayman asking for a four or five card major) – 3♥ (I have one 4 card major) – 3NT all pass. Same result, Our confidence for a big swing evaporated.

Should we have reached slam? Certainly it is right to try somehow – and on this auction 2NT – 3♦ (transfer) 3♥ - 4♣ fits the bill nicely. Now South can value their hand differently - with 10 cards in the two bid suits, only three can remain – how much is wastage points wise? To find out, I suggest you temporise with a 4♦ cue bid, North will not know which suit you are planning to play in, but when he co-operates by cuebidding his spade void you can move confidently to 6♣.

Worse still 3NT could be made. Declarer takes the fourth round of spades and realises that if West has the ♥A then he can cash out his last spade. So he cashes five clubs throwing ♥2. West hast to find four discards. Two hearts and one diamond are painless, but the last club forces another diamond. He must be clinging to ♥A and a spade and his last two diamonds.  It is true that he could have come down to QX in diamonds but if he had started with that he could have thrown a spade but could be endplayed when put in with the ♥A. So ♦J from the table and if not covered passed to West.

NB: You can gain information from the table presence and the cards you see discarded by your opponents. On this hand if you see three diamonds you can be fairly confident West does not hold the queen – play the JD at trick ten. If you see three hearts play East for the AH, if you see two hearts and two diamonds – it your guess! But try the JD anyway first – East might cover with the Queen.

This game is great for never giving up!

Comment
As always better to be lucky than good

The Centenary Cup for Pall Mall Club Teams of 8 was played in the delightful rooms of the Oxford and Cambridge Club on Monday this week. The RAC team of myself partnering Paul Weston, Marina and Terry, Ross and Howard, David and Andrew were runners up to the hosts - full details are on their website.

It has long been apparent that slam bidding has been a serious RAC weakness. There were five hands on which slam could be made, played therefore ten times but only bid by RAC four times. However this 14 Imp swing was one of which we were not proud!

The bidding is as above. In response to 1  West would love to make a game forcing bid, but needs better and longer spades to make a jump shift response. West reluctant to rebid his poor suit leads to Wests 4th suit forcing 2. 2  shows a  minimum at least 5\4. 4NT is ace asking Roman Keycard Blackwood style, 5 =two - the queen of hearts. 5NT asks do you have any unbid K (ie not king trumps)?

West fell from grace ending the auction with 7 because from the bidding he knows a minor suit Ace or the  K must be missing.

The lead was a diamond. Declarer won in hand.

Now what is the best percentage play for no trump losers? The  J or a small heart? The books will say finesse the Q which is what

Declarer did and when the  10 fell on the right it was indicated that a second round finesse of the  9 was the winning play.

Only one other pair missed the small slam. We apologised to our opponents for our poor bidding; but took the points

As always better to be lucky than good.

Comment

RAC lost to Olgiata on Saturday 1 May. Not quite the crushing defeat of last year.

This hand was extremely costly for the RAC. All Souths played in 3NT with silent opponents and on a heart lead. Look first at only the N/S hands. Declarer has six top tricks and needs three more. Diamonds can only provide a source for two more so a spade trick is vital and must be lead immediately. This loses to the ♠ A and another heart is returned. The only hope now is an “avoidance play”. West must be kept off lead. Cross to the ♠ Q and lead a small diamond. If the Queen comes up Declarer ducks and is home. So on the low diamond South wins and plays another, ducking (and his prayers are answered) to the Queen. Notice: the first diamond must be lead from Dummy.

I have in fact altered the actual hand. The ♠ A was in West and once a spade is lead 3NT cannot be beaten. Unfortunately both Olgiata players got it right and both RAC did not, -26 Imps

Comment
What's the catch?

My team did not last long in the Devonshire Cup this year. This hand contributed.

North passed and East who had demonstrated a desire for sound pre-empts opened 3♣.South bid 3NT and there it stayed. West lead the ♣7, Declarer played low from dummy and East won the ♣ A and returned a club.

South won and should count his tricks looking to secure nine as overtricks are not important in the Devonshire. Declarer can count three spade tricks, two club tricks and three diamond tricks – eight tricks with potential for more should diamonds break. But suppose they do not? The Devonshire is great for teams tactics with rubber scoring. At these forms of scoring, Declarer should look first to secure the contract.

What do you know from the bidding? East must surely have one heart honour but probably not two (or they could have opened 1♣  not 3♣). Once this is realised declarer should lead a heart to ruin defensive communications immediately. On the day sadly this did not happen, Declarer gave up the third diamond. East played another club and had no answer when the ♠ J failed to drop and the  A provided the vital entry to East’s hand.

When everything looks easy, what is the catch?

Comment
Leads and questions - challenge for the defence

Nobody likes to sit down for their first board and find they are in the slam zone. It happened to us.  Playing five card majors North opened 1♠. South bid 3 , a strong jump shift – (16+ HCP and either a stand- alone heart suit or five + hearts and secondary support for spades.) North  alerted and stated, when asked by West, that it was a “splinter bid showing primary spade support and shortage in hearts” - clearly not yet awake.

Ethically, South must assume partner knows the true meaning of the jump (ie act as if there’d been a wall between them. South must act as if he did not hear the explanation). Over 3♠ which should be natural and better spades, South made a 4  cue bid, planning to later tell partner about the spade fit, and over four spades, bashed the slam.

Before East led South corrected the misexplanation. "It is not a splinter, I have a game force hand with good hearts (and now spade support)”

Pity poor East. It is clear that his opponents are off the rails, and do not know what they are doing. Leading from a K is unattractive, not to mention they have showed first round control of diamonds and defence needs a quick trick. Our opponent reasonably, but unsuccessfully chose ♣Q, the unbid suit.

The board was played nine times and four pairs bid the slam. At the other three tables the  2 was lead but the slam defeated only twice.

What would you have lead after this weird bidding?

A note on table presence: Do your best to avoid asking questions during a live auction if you have no intention of bidding. As can be seen only the opponents can gain by this.

Comment
Risk for reward

It is a hand that would not merit comment other than at matchpoint pairs scoring. North do you open as dealer? Clearly a borderline decision and at Teams or Rubber you would not due to 1. a poor quality suit (you do not want it led) and 2. you have only eleven high card points. You do not know it yet, but should you opt for pass,so will everyone else and the hand will be thrown in.

This happened 6 out of 10 times. However. You do have two defensive tricks and a five card major suit - so at match-points - yes do open. Turn now to East. It’s now or never. You want a heart lead, so a risky 2  overcall could be made. Again at Teams or rubber no. After partner opens 1♠ South has a simple raise to 2♠  and there the auction lies. On repeated trump leads North is held to eight tricks. One player was allowed to get away with 1NT as South, making after a disastrous diamond lead (note the value of an overcall). Note also that East can make 3  so the optimum is – 100 for NS for a near bottom.

The lesson here is that at pairs you cannot afford NOT to take risks.  

 

Comment
Missing for victory?

A coaching session was held this week with the eight players selected for the coming match against the Italian Olgiata team. The practice hands were taken from Bridgewebs countrywide. The criterion being "match deciders" where both sides have opportunities.

On this week's hand at one table East opened the bidding with 2♥  weak. South now made a double, presumably to show spades, West raised hearts and North jumped to 4♠ . Everyone passed and four spades made twelve tricks. An easy slam missed?

The bidding was better at the other table (as shown). This also made twelve tricks. It was Dorette who spotted what we all missed. If West makes a Lightner double of six spades, which says "do not lead clubs or hearts or trumps" East will put a diamond on the table , West will ruff at their turn, and six spades will fail. One down!

Should table one claim to have won the board? Like I said both sides opportunities.

 

Comment
Hmmm hmmmm

The Swiss teams on the 31st March was effectively decided on board 20 in the penultimate round when the eventual winners met the runners up. The match was all square, but this was the last board with West the dealer and all vulnerable.

For the winners 3NT was reached on the above auction. 2♠  showed a transfer to clubs. When partner responded 3♣ saying I like clubs, West bid 3NT. The  4 was led and on the run of the clubs North threw four spades and three hearts, and South four spades and two diamonds, for 3NT one down.

At the other table, West opened with a dubious 3♣ , tempting North to double. East should now bid 5♣  (for -500) but chose instead to pass, Now South jumped to 4 which made +1 and 11 imps to the winners.

In Swiss events of five board matches, it is one hand that usually decides the match.

Comment
Frustration for both sides

Paul and I bid (as I suspect did most) 1  - 1♠  -2♣ (more informative than 3). Now we bid 2  4th suit force  - 2NT. East should now bid 3  which must be forcing - at the table partner took no chances and simply bid game. Clearly the best game is 5D - but if you find yourself in 3NT provided you make the following precautionary action you will find your way to nine tricks.

On a spade lead ♠ 9, cover the ♠ 10. North must and return a spade to the ♠ Q . When another spade was played Declarer simply ducked and the suit is blocked.
There is no winning defence and all Declarers made the game.
Irritating!

Comment
Bringing the Bridge Gods

If we could ask one gift from the Bridge Gods what would it be? Bidding? Too vague, finesses to be right? Would we bother to play?

No!  What about the ability to make the killing opening lead?

North deals at Love All playing a weak NT opens 1 . The bidding continues, settling at 3♠. North is on lead. Partner is obviously minimum, the high cards are likely to divide between East and West. -  Where might a surprise extra trick come from? At the table North underled his ♣A, ♣9 South played the ♣6 (looks like it might be a doubleton). Declarer won the ♣10  and lead a spade to the 9. South ducked and it was all over. Looking at all four hands, if South wins the Ace of trumps and returns partners lead he will secure a club ruff to beat he contract by one trick as Declarer must also lose the four aces.

Comment
A Hearty Fit Level
South deals at Game All, most players could not resist the 3S opener. West would like to bid but dare not, with North unlimited. When North raises to 4S this effectively silences East.

West begins with A♣ , partner drops the J♣ . Looking at all four hands it is easy to see that only a heart switch now defeats 4S, But I suspect West tried for a club ruff and Declarer is home with the suit established.

Five players made 10 tricks (one pair were in 5S -1 ) so the defence was never found. At the remaining table North passed 3S (perhaps she had seen South’s vulnerable pre-empts before!) and East in the protective position realised that a nervous West must have values. He chanced 4D and partner could not resist game.

South without knowledge of her partner’s top spades began with a disastrous A  and another trapping the Q .

Now East can discard his losing spade on the fourth heart winner. 5D+1 and all the match points. A difficult competitive hand, the sort that decides matches. Both sides have their chances in bidding and play.

Comment
Roy Ham brings home the bacon


There are always a couple of hands in a duplicate evening that separate success from failure and this was one of them. With both sides holding respectable major suit holdings there was plenty of action in the bidding, but as is usually the case spades win out in the end, but Roy was only one of two declarers that succeeded in landing his contract. East kicks off with the Queen of Hearts which runs round to the King, Ace and a trump. If the diamonds break 3-2 then declarer will prevail with 5 spades, 4 diamonds and 1 club as long the diamond is on the right side. However if the diamonds break 4-1 then an extra trick via a ruff will be required. Roy drew two rounds of trumps and played Ace and another diamond. East then fell from grace and ruffed Roy's loser, and now the trump in dummy brings home the contract. It would have been a different result if East had not trumped the second diamond. Now Roy would have had to surrender the lead to West who can push a ♣ through and now East play a trump and now declarer is a trick short.

The contract is undefeatable if after winning the first trick, declarer plays Ace and another diamond. Now a third diamond from dummy allows West in who plays a club, but now a trump or a heart force from west does no damage as declarer who can now ruff a diamond in dummy, draw trumps and claim.

Opportunities for good play from both sides.

 

Comment
Avoiding the bloodbath

Sometimes you have to scratch around for an interesting hand, but when one side concedes 1520 the senses are awakened. After a welcome whiskey in Killarney, following tonight’s Open pairs, I was trawling through the hands for this week’s duplicate and unsurprisingly my eyes spotted this little gem.

 

Who was to blame for the carnage? As often happens with multiple pile ups the answer is that it was a combined effort. As I wasn’t present I have to guess the bidding, but this wasn’t a difficult task. The first problem is the action by North. Whilst I can empathise with the need to take some action with an opening hand, this is a dangerous venture when it relies on support from partner in one suit. However on this occasion North got lucky.

 

In my view a double of 1H guarantees four spades, so when East makes an automatic redouble, south must bid 1S. The end result still isn’t pleasant because the best that NS can get away with is down 1, but look how difficult it is for EW to find the winning action of pass-pass-double, and that only works because 3NT by EW fails by one trick.

Comment
Puppet Stayman

This hand from the last Swiss teams has several interesting bidding features to it. Few could argue with an opening of 2NT, but then the bidding in the room starts to diverge. One partnership tried 4NT which was taken as old fashioned Blackwood. On hearing 2 aces responder blasted 6NT. On correct defence this can’t be made, but more of this later.

6  is cold but should you bid it. The traditional wisdom is that you need 33 or more points for a slam but this only applies to 6NT. For trump games a slam on 4-4 fit can be made on a lot less if the high cards are in the right places.

On this deal both doubletons are working, and to get there it must be right to kick off with 3♣  to ask about the majors. The sequence illustrated uses puppet stayman, and 3  denies a 5 card major but promises at least one 4 card major. This hand is slightly unusual because responder has two 4 card majors and now announces slam interest by bidding 4♣ . 4  would show both majors but game interest only.

Opener bids 4  to accept the slam try in hearts. 4NT would be a slam acceptance in spades. South has choices. 5C would be control showing, which has merit of finding the A . In the sequence shown 4NT is 1430 Blackwood which reveals 3 key cards. This doesn’t allow room for a queen ask so South is on a slight guess but nevertheless presses on with 6 .

In teams there is need to look for 6NT unless you are playing point a board, but at pairs there is a great deal of temptation to go for the max and to bring this in you need some help from East with a spade lead, and now your 10 tricks have grown to 11. One short of the magic number, and therefore the ingredients are therefore a squeeze. The first job is to test the hearts, and once you find they break the next is to rectify the count by ducking a diamond.

When declarer regains the lead on the next trick, East will be powerless to hang on to both spades and diamonds when declarer cashes the hearts and the clubs.

Comment
Fireworks at Night of the Stars

Under the leadership of Terry Hewitt the Night of the Stars goes from strength to strength. Now nestling alongside the Lederer many of the competitors that compete in the latter event make themselves available for auction, and this year the event raised over £50,000 for several worthwhile charities.

There were several hands that produced appropriate fireworks and hand number 17 was no exception. If your system allows you to open 1NT on an eleven count you silence East, however if it doesn’t then fortune favours the brave when East has the opportunity to put a spanner in the works with a bid of 2 .

This was what happened at our table and South is ok on the first round with an automatic double. North bids 3♣  and now the spotlight is on South. In the event the bid of choice was 3NT and this was passed out. In south’s defence he took the view that has North’s 3♣  bid was forced it was up to North to make a further try if there were undisclosed values, and there is a good case for 4NT.

However when I gave this hand to one of the commentators at the Lederer his first question was were we playing Lebonsohl, because if we were then Norths bid of 3C shows at least 8 points and now South has enough to bid 6NT but even if he doesn’t go there directly surely 3H is a better bid. Now North should realise his hand is massive and bid 4H.

I am a great fan of Lebonsohl, especially as part of a defence to opening 2 bids as it allows the responder to the double to distinguish between weak forced responses and constructive raises. Without this gadget South is bidding in the dark after 3C

6NT gathers you a score of 55%  but finding the squeeze for the 13th trick ratchets this up to 88%. Regardless of the lead you cash out you diamond honours in the south hand before turning your attention to the club suit. On the 4th club west has to give up a spade or a diamond and surrender.

 

 

Comment
Bidding at the five level

Board 24 posed the usual interesting challenge for both sides, when the perennial question of to bid or not to bid cropped up as it always does at the five level. Four spades is undefeatable so South should bid 5 diamonds at the first opportunity. The objective in hands like this is to be the last to make a guess and for this reason East should bid 4 spades not 3 on the first round. South should still bid 5  though and now it is down to West to eschew the adage that the 5 level belongs to the opponents or bid 5♠  which on this occasion is correct.

Should North end as declarer , and west find the lead of the King of Hearts, an inspired play will be required to drop the King of clubs, but is there any choice? Assuming the King has been lead from touching honours surely West must have the KC for his bid.

Interestingly if East leads a spade now declarer has time to make an alternative play after discovering the ‘bad break’ in the trump suit. With an extra round of breathing space declarer has time to lead a club from south up to the Jack. This play wins if the holding in the West hand is Kx.

Lots of opportunity for good play all round.

Comment
Kick back

This week, I have selected a hand from a Business House League match played at the RAC. I was asked by one of our opponents how we had bid the hand, which is excuse enough for its inclusion. East west on this occasion were using a Strong NT. Weak no trumpers would need some form a check-back to reach the 4♣  bid.

I play 3♣  in this sequence not only unconditionally game forcing but also made where there are slam ambitions. There is no point in providing a road map to your opponents if the only two contracts of interest are 3NT or 4 . There is an argument for West to bid 3  as an indicator of acceptance rather than 3NT which is really a sign off, so all credit to East for having one more try with 4♣ .

A system agreement I have with my regular partners is that when you shift out of 3NT to 4 of a minor 4NT is natural and not Blackwood. In pairs and for that matter point a board you really want to be able to play in 4NT over 5♣ /5  so as this is a sign off you need another bid to ask for key cards and this is where kick back come in.

There are many variations to this bid, but this is easiest to remember. After 4♣ /4  the next suit up is Kick back RKCB, and the responses follow the next step principal, i.e. in this example over 4 , 4♠  would show 1/4 or 3/0 depending on the method you are playing.

This time though you discover that your partner has two key cards and the queen of clubs, and so west can bid 6♣ .

 

 

Comment
Case for the Defence

I was lucky enough to be invited to play in the Portland invitation pairs just before Christmas, and I was told an amusing story by Willie Coyle who was the eventual winner of the event, along with his partner, the wily Bernard Teltscher. I believe their combined ages is somewhere in excess of 170. The story concerned the merit of leading doubles and Willie is in the hardly ever camp, but there is one holding that a certain MJ Flint would never leave from and that is Jack doubleton, in fact he found this so abhorrent he would change partners.

It is still possible to break 4♥ if your partner leads the J♣  but South must then resist the temptation to go up with the Ace otherwise declarer now has two club tricks to go with seven hearts and surely the 10th trick will come from either a spade or a diamond. It shouldn't be that difficult to find because the lead of the Jack must deny the Queen. It looks like the lead is from a doubleton and not only that but Jack doubleton, but in this case you have bid the suit so your partner is excused. What south should appreciate is that unless West has a singleton Queen it costs nothing to duck the lead of the J♣

However even is North leads a spade say, South my still find he is put to the test later in the hand, as declarer can draw trumps, ruff out the spade suit,  and play Ace and another diamond, now the ducking play is a lot more obvious.

What is so curious about this hand is the entire room miss-defended the hand. Normally when I see a clean sheet like this I suspect that the double dummy solution is so obscure it is beyond the capability of humans, but that is not the case this time.

 

 

Comment
The finesse rides again

Louise Boyle played hand 23 well. To make 11 tricks you have to play the black suits for one looser in each suit. The play of the club suit is straightforward, you have to guess the layout of the missing honours as they occurred and insert the Jack on the first round.  The play of the spade suit is far less obvious. In order to play the suit for one loser again you pray for split honours but this time there is no double finesse position so the correct play is an intra finesse. When you lead a low spade from dummy towards your jack East is fixed. If he puts up the king then a finesse position is created against west’s queen. If he plays low the Jack is draws the queen and the Ace fells the King on the next time round.

 

Comment
How much is your Queen worth part 1

There two holdings that are definitely not worth their Milton point count Qx and Jxx, unless they are working cards. In this hand the Queen of clubs is working because of partners holding in that suit, and, with no intervention the bidding should go 1S-2S-3C-4S. There is no play to the hand as long as declarer plays up to the AK in clubs and back to the Queen opening up the known finesse position. It is much more difficult if West opens the bidding with 2H.

 

Comment
How much is your Queen worth part 2

Here is the other side of the coin. This time the QC is not working because East is missing the KC. This is a difficult hand to bid. Let’s suppose you are playing 5 card stayman and your partner opens 2NT. After 3C you discover that opener has 5 hearts and assuming a maximum of 22 points that leaves 9 points for the opposition. Almost certainly you are missing a King and an Ace. If the missing King is spades then you are in great shape as you have a double fit and the QC is pulling her weight, if the missing king is the KC now the slam is not such a good proposition as you will now need to hope the King is with North. So you are down to a guess. I guessed wrong.   

 

Comment
Temptation must be resisted

The most interesting slam from a bidding point of view is hand 15. South will open 1♠  regardless of what system is being played, and in old fashioned Acol North has enough to stretch to 3♣ , but how many people still do that. The modern style is to conserve bidding space with strong hands and out comes 2C which is increasingly likely to be almost forcing to game. Over to East who will bid either 2 or 3 hearts. Suppose the bid is 2 ; South has a number of options, 3♣ ,3  or even 4 . 3 seems a little tame to me unless you are playing 2 over 1 in which case it is the correct bid. The singleton heart has increased that value of the hand and it’s beginning to look as though that North’s values are in the other suits, so the choice is between 3H and 4H. 4H might be miss-construed as showing first round control so 3H seems the right bid agreeing clubs and showing extra values. North can probably bid 3S now and eventually 6♣  will be found.

West can make much more of a nuisance of himself by bidding 3H which is far superior than 2H as it consumes valuable bidding space, and now South probably has to bid 4 .

There is a twist in the tale though because if North-South do find the slam East has an easy save with 6  for a mere 500. Well done all those who sneaked through +620!

Comment
Fine defence but no cigar

There were a number of interesting hands from the teams night. As usual a number of slam hands with not one bid. First though let’s look at a part score hand because there is an interesting point in the play. East ends up in a contract of 2  unless you are playing a Weak NT and open 1NT with a 5 card suit, which you shouldn’t do, unless you are playing 5 card majors. In fact this is a pretty good example of why 4 card majors and a weak NT works because you can open 1  and rebid hearts.

South has a pretty normal lead of a diamond which declarer let’s run to the Queen but is captured by North’s King. North now has the opportunity of a surround play by leading the 10♠ . Whatever east plays, south wins the trick with the Ace and returns the suit.  Dummy’s 9 is surrounded by the Q8 of spades in the North hand and now the defence will come to two spade tricks. Or will they?

Declarer wins the spade return and crosses to the Ace of diamonds, return to hand with the A  and dispose of the losing spade on the Queen of Diamonds.  So unfortunately North's fine defence goes unrewarded on this occasion.

 

Comment
Fortune favours the brave

This deal threw up 11 different results, and although some of the contracts were predictable others were byzantine and you have to get quite imaginative to come up with a logical sequence to reach the final contract. West has choices of Pass, 2  or 3 . It looks as though one EW was allowed to open and play in 2D which ended up in an average score.

Suppose you are south and 2  comes round to you, are you tempted to take any action because if so you are heading for a bad score as any contract by NS is doomed, and this is not the hand to get busy with a double as to my mind this promises at 4 cards in at least one 4 card major.

So on the face of it, it looks like a victory for 3 weak twos, if this isn’t part of your armoury and 2  means something else then West has to choose between pass and 3 . The vulnerability favours the 3  opening, which is partly why I don't like a weak 2 opening as it often results in sending in a boy to do a man's job.

Should West elect to pass the bidding will come round to South who will either open 1NT or 1 , the latter probably silencing West, the former possibly forcing a brave 3 . Over 1  North can introduce his hearts which may be passed out or corrected to 1NT by south. 1NT should drift off but one NS was allowed to make it for what should have been a well deserved top if it wasn’t for the fact that my opposition found a devilishly clever lead of a small heart  against my contract of 3 .

Looking at all 4 hands I should have risen with the King but as my left hand opponent wasn’t someone I credited with under leading Aces I played small with disastrous results as I lost the first three tricks, and then compounded the error by playing North for the Ace of spades.

The correct play is to put up the King of Hearts and play the 10  from dummy. South might as well let this hold, and declarer follows this with the Ace and another club which is ruffed and crucially shortens declarers trumps. In hand the Q♠  is now led which runs round to South, who now cashes the QH and gets off play with a spade or a diamond. Declarer is now home because there are sufficient entries with the spades and to ruff a further club. The final coup de grass is achieved by exiting with a heart south is forced to ruff and is now forced to lead away from the KJ  presenting declarer with the ninth trick.

 

Comment
More slam bidding

 

Once again a routine slam proves elusive. There are several routes to Rome, and the one chosen by the only pair who bid the slam was to employ a bid of 2H opposite the 1D opening. This has fallen out of fashion because it doesn’t pass the frequency test. However if you do bid the west hand this way, there is no way that east will stop short of slam. Suppose however that you bid 1H now East has a choice of showing his shape and strength with a reverse bid of 2S or get across the full value of his hand by rebidding 2NT. The problem with 2S is that bidding can easily die in 3NT as the results show. Far better in my opinion to bid 2NT for now West will now see that there is a slam on. There is no danger in missing a possible spade contract as West can make further enquiries using a check-back bid or 3C or 3D depending on what devices take your fancy and after discovering that there is no major suit fit a straightforward bid of 6NT should bring the auction to a conclusion.

 

Comment
The Naughty Knave

How would you bid the hand sitting west after your partner opens 1H, playing 4 card majors with a weak NT.  You presumably kick off with 1S and when your partner rebids 1NT you simply bid 3NT. The more observant of you will realise that you are a card missing J♠ , and this is what happened at the table. With six spades wouldn’t you at least try 3♠  over 1NT which may or may not be converted to 4♠ , but in response to 3NT I think you have to trust your partner. In the room only two players converted to 4♠  which un-doubled is a good score, as only two pairs in the room found their way home to 3NT.

Amusingly by the time that the missing J♠  was discovered no revoke had been established, and as it belonged to dummy, despite being face up on the floor could not be deemed as an exposed card.

The play is far from straightforward and requires fortuitous distribution. Suppose south finds the heart lead, not easy after the opening bid of 1H, North wins and returns a heart which declarer ducks. After winning the third heart, it looks at first sight that it is a 50/50 guess which minor suit to go after, but there is a cast iron case why it has to be diamonds, because in addition to the King of clubs you are also missing the T♣  which will be promoted if North has the K♣.

With no entry to dummy apart from the singleton spade declarer has to hope that the spades break as they do. So over to the Ace of Spades, cash the KS  and run the Jack of diamonds – it wins! Now hoping that North holds 3 diamonds to the Queen declarer cashes three more diamond tricks.

The stage is set for the throw in, declarer exists with a heart and south can cash his heart winner but has to lead away from the K♣  and the game is made.  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Comment
To bid or not to bid

There were no less than seven hands which offered temptation of a slam bonus and two of these qualified for grand status. However for this week I have selected a part score. Hand 16 goes to show there is no foolproof method to tell you what level to bid to. The south hand comes in at seven losers, however those pairs that bid to four hearts were to be disappointed.

Two out of nine pairs ended in No Trump contracts, which fails if the defence find their diamond fit. Playing a weak NT South finds the heart fit via stayman,  and it’s hard to see how to stop short of game. The same is true for the pairs playing a strong NT, the bidding will progress along the following lines. 1♣ - 1 - 2 - 4 .

Unfortunately, the club pips are not enough to bring the contract home, exchange the 7♣  for the 8♣  and 4  is on. Even so declarer has to spot the intra finesse position of the club suit. South leads the 8♣  from hand and west can’t afford to cover with the J♣. East wins with the trick the 10. Now when declarer regains the lead he leads the Queen of spades from the North hand pinning the Jack.

Well done to the pairs that managed to spot the deficiency in the south hand and stayed out of game.

Finally back to the slam hands. Andrew Robson has written often about the danger of bidding grand slams, and the two examples this week show why. On hand 11 there is no difficulty in wrapping up 13 tricks because of the 3-2 spade fit, it is a much more precarious contract if the suit breaks 4-1. Given that you have a 75% score in the bag for the small slam it doesn’t seem good odds to take the risk of exchanging this score for a possible additional 4 match points. The same applies on hand 17 where the grand is facilitated by the favourable position of the queen of hearts.

Comment
A Tale of two slams part 2

This is the second of the elusive slams. There are lots of options for north to consider over the double.

First of all re-double. The problem with this bid is that you are going to be forever trying to convince south that you have a spade fit, and I prefer to keep this bid for when you have the majority of the points and when defending might be the best option which is not the case here.

The second option is to bid 1, this is clearly forcing and promises 5 but again it is going to be an uphill struggle to persuade south you have 4♠ not 3 when you get around to providing delayed support.

The third option is to bid 3H as a fit jump, but of course you need to have this agreed first as a lot of players play this as a weak pre-emptive bid.

Finally there is 2NT. This is traditionally played as a good raise to 3 but why not extend this to be a Jacoby bid of 13+ with 4 card trump support. This seems to have a lot of merit

 

Comment
A tale of two slams part 1

Two slams eluded almost everyone last week. Here is the first.

The bidding is fairly routine until the bidding comes round to South who has to make a decision on whether to bid 3♠ or 4♠. If he elects to bid 3♠, North may make a slam try by bidding 4♣, but as south’s 3♠ is forced may well just sign off in 4♠ glad that he has found a fit. South has a much better hand than he might have done and so should he choose 4S after which there will surely be no stopping North.

 

Comment
Asking for Kings

I was scratching around for a hand with something interesting in the play, but nothing stood out for me. In terms of rarity value the cold grand slam – Hand 1 has some interesting points in the bidding. For purposes of the illustration I will use a sequence using a strong NT. The first point of interest is the 3♣ bid after the completion of the transfer. I play this as forcing to game as I think most people do, but it’s worthwhile checking that this is your partnership agreement.

East’s hand certainly improves by the time a response is required to 3♣. The key bid here is 3. This has to be a control showing bid with slam interest. What now for west? there seem to be two choices. 3 or 3♠, 3NT would be showing a 5 card heart suit without anything to say about the spade suit. 3♠ clearly would show a spade control, but for me 3 shows an extra heart and this has more going for it than showing the Ace of spades.

True from East’s point of view, there are potential spade losers, but this seems the only chance to show the nine card fit in the trump suit which is important for the 13th trick.

East rolls out Blackwood, and bingo, not only has his partner got the A♠ but the queen of trumps as well, and now the benefit of the 3 bid becomes clear, as 10 of West’s cards are known, and the search for the Grand slam can bid by bidding 5NT or 6♣ depending on your methods.

My style is to bid 5NT which confirms the possession of 5 key cards and asks for the lowest king, whereas 6♣ asks specifically for help in that suit. West dutifully bids 6♣ and East replies with 6. West has a 4 looser hand and East has now promised 4 controls, so it is just a question of which grand slam to bid, West should bid 7and resist the temptation to bid 7NT, which needs a 3-3 break in clubs and therefore only a 38% chance. 

Comment
Devonshire Pairs

Only one pair found the slam on hand 4, possibly aided and abetted by an ultra aggressive intervention from South. The bidding started quietly with West opening 1 (East West were playing five card majors), and East responded with 1♠ only to be greeted with a 4♣ barrage from south, 5♣ would make the bidding really interesting.

West now has interesting options, and to my mind a double would show a minimum opening hand and a pass something stronger. If this was the case here then pass is an excellent bid. West bid 5♣ giving East a chance to settle in a game contract, 5NT would probably mean pick a slam, but west recognising the value his spade holding bid 6♠.

Interestingly south should bid 7♣ and concede 1400 as opposed to 1430 as the slam cannot be beaten. At the table South led her singleton diamond and Andrew Kisiel sitting east found his way home by leading small to the Q after drawing trumps and cashing diamonds. After the 4♣ bid at this vulnerability the position of the K is pretty well marked.

The play becomes a little more elegant if South kicks off with the K♣. Now East draws trumps and cashes four diamonds. On the last spade South is down to two clubs and two hearts, and has Hobson’s choice of baring her K or being thrown in with the lone club and having to lead away from her K.

Comment
Trump Coup

What are the odds that in 24 boards 25% will be slams of which 2 are grand. Very small I would venture to suggest. This was board 1 which I played against my erstwhile contributor, and I remarked at the time this hand was a likely candidate for the hand of the week.

 

The play is very difficult and requires a tough judgement call for declarer. First of all let us consider the bidding. Tony Scouller,sitting south, decided to make my life difficult with a destructive bid of 3♣ The gamble with this sort of bid is that it might help declarer in the play although in practice my partner hadn’t played against Tony enough to suspect that he might have made this bid on a 6 card suit.

 

I chipped in with a double (4NT bid showing a two suiter is an alternative) to see what happened next and my partner found a very good bid of 4♥. I then bid 4♠. My partner found another good bid of 5 and I raised to 6. We were one of only only two pairs in the room to find 6 Our opposition settled in  4 after East opened 2♥, not a bid you want to make in front of the children.

 

On a club lead, declarer has to consider that the distribution an unfavourable distribution of the heart suit.  If the heart suit is divided 4-1, the only way home is via a trump coup.

 

Winning the Q♣ lead, declarer must play 3 rounds of spades discarding a diamond on the second round and  ruffing the third. Next over to dummy with the A and a diamond ruff.

 

Now the moment of truth. Did south makes his bid on 6 cards or 7 clubs?

 

Hopeing it is a six card suit, declarer crosses to dummy with a club, and ruffs another diamond. Now, by ruffing a club in dummy with the Ace of hearts (key play), North is powerless and has to throw his last diamond.

 

At this stage North holds QJ63 and declarer K1098. On the last diamond declarer over ruffs whatever North plays, and exits with the 10. North is now end played and has to concede the last two tricks.

 

Comment
Elimination

I am not brave enough to try and compete with the expert commentary that accompanied the Night of the Stars, so here is a hand provided by Tony Scouller that came up in a Business House League match recently. Bouncing your opposition out of the auction does not come without risk as you give away a lot of information, and in this week's deal it allows declarer to piece together layout of the cards in double quick time.

North leads 10which is revealing, you duck this to South who wins with the Queen and returns a spade which goes Jack to your Ace. It is starting to look like North opened with King - Jack to six spades, a doubleton diamond. With no honours in hearts North must have the K♣ for his bid, and in any case you need him to hold this card for the contract to succeed.

You draw trumps and North follows three times which confirms your theory, and after finessing the club Queen and bring down the K♣ North and remove his diamond exit card by cashing the A The stage is now set for the throw in as North is left with only spades and declarer can exit safely with a spade.

As is so often the case the key play is at trick one, if declarer mistakenly takes the first trick with the A the end play isn't possibile.

 

 

Comment
Safety Plays

I have been in Venice since last Thursdays pairs so this week’s hand of the week is a little later than usual. As always I am indebted to Tony Scouller’s help with the analysis and there were two boards that had a claim for attention but in the end Board 12 with a humdrum safety play that every one missed, made it to the podium ahead of Board 23.

 

The latter was cold for 6 clubs which eluded every one, although one pair did dry 6 spades without success, but more of that later.

 

On hand 12, my partner presumably made the same mistake as others, and was seduced by the appeal of running the Queen. This is the wrong play, because without the 10 you end up losing 2 tricks in the layout shown. As you can afford to lose one trick in Spades but not two, the correct play is as follows.

 

On a heart lead, you play small to the Ace which fells the King. Before conceding a trick to North’s ten of spades you must establish a ruff for the tenth trick so you lead a club to the King which North wins and plays back a heart which you win in hand and get off play with another heart. Whatever south leads now gives you your 10th trick.

 

Board 23 shows the difficulty of Blackwood and minor suit slams. Regardless of the NT system employed you the bidding will go something like 1♣-1♠-2NT-3♣-3♠-? If East now bids 3NT that will be the end, but surely he is worth another try. One method is to agree that any minor suit bid at the 4 level is a slam try and a 4NT bid after that is a sign off. This allows you to play in a NT contract rather than 5♣ or 5. If you play this then you need a replacement to 4NT and the gadget that allows you to do this is kickback where the next suit up is your favourite version of Blackwood. So in this case if West wants to enquire about controls then opposite 4♣ he bids 4 and 4 becomes the first step response.

 

6 clubs is cold but in pairs addicts it pays to go for the maximum and bid 6NT. This makes on a strip squeeze against North. After testing the spades which must come in for the slam to have any chance North cannot withstand the pressure after declarer cashes his clubs. Either he has to come down 2 diamonds in which case the Q will drop or if he retains 3 diamonds he will be down to the bare Ace of hearts and now can be thrown in and is forced to lead away from the Queen of diamonds.

  

 

Comment
Diabolical Defence

This weeks hand contains a most curious challenge which even when all hands are visible isn't at all obvious. As Pamela and I suffered a bottom at the hands os director Nicole Cook I will include our bidding. My only comment about this is Pamela's gutsy double. Should we manage to find 5 defensive tricks then we would surely secure a top. The double in the north seat must mean partner I have some values in the outside suits it's up to you if you want to pass or press on to 4♣

Pamela kicks off with a trump which looks very reasnoble from where I am sitting, but paradoxically this gives declarer an early entry to his hand to be able to play a small diamond to the K from here there is no way back for the defence.  Try the effect of leading a club, now declarer is deprived of a vital entry to dummy, and declarer hasn't got time to set up the hearts.

 

Comment
What do you lead

 

Wast bids 3NT after some hesitation

 

1.     What do you lead?

2.     would your choice alter if your partner had doubled?

 

 

 

Comment
Which way to the Grand

Hand 14 this week illustrated the power of the shortage. With a combined count of 28 East-West had a cold grand slam available with a trick to spare, 5 could only find game!So what is the recommended to route to success? One way of avoiding the slam is for East to miss the opportunity to make a move on his rebid. At our table the bid was 4 spades and being a pessimist I took the view that I faced two loosing diamonds on the lead and passed. So I am going to assume that East finds a control showing bid showing slam interest of 4. Now I think West is at the crossrads of who takes control of the aution, and I would be interested to hear about possibile autions from this point in. I will release my preffered sequence later in the week together with my reasons.

There are various ways of missing the slam. If after 1C-P-1S-P- 4S The player with the long spades may take the view that he is looking at two diamond loosers and pass, which is what I did. Stopping at 5S is explained by a RKCB sequence where the reponse to 4NT is 5♣ showing 0 or 3 key cards and the 4NT bidder signs off on the basis that parter has no controls.

My prefered bid over 4 is 4NT rather than 4 because the hand with the long spades is the one that needs take control, as there is no logical way to get over to his partner that he has a void club or 7 spades. Now partner comesback with the joyful news that he holds 3 key cards, and you can now ask about the Q♠ and when partner confirms this you can now bid 5NT confirming that you hold all five key cards. Partner will show his kings and I prefer a system where you show the lowest king, and so in the is case if partner bids either 4♣ or 4 the grand is certain because either will take care of the second diamond loser.

The alternative sequence is to cue bid the 4now East cue bids with 5♣ and West shows his second round control with 5 and East now bids 5NT. This has to be a  Grand slam force and West can bid 7♠ on the basis of the quality of the suit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comment