| To Love and to Cherish |
|
This year is the 50th anniversary of 'Killing Defence at Bridge' by Hugh Kelsey, one of the finest bridge books ever, not just about defence. A must read for any serious bridge player.
One of the chapters, 'To Love and to Cherish' covers the need to think about partner and help them to make the right decision. This hand from the EBU Autumn Pairs on the 6th of October could have come straight from the pages.
After South bids one club and their partner responds one heart, East decides not to apply the 'IHAS' test for overcalls (I Have a Suit) and passes. Against North 3NT, a diamond lead goes to the eight, ten and queen. North then cashes Ace and King of Clubs (partner playing Jack and Eight) and then North leads a low diamond. You decide might as well take the Ace and partner's discard discourages both spades and hearts. How do you proceed?
|
|
Prospects look poor. Declarer clearly has 5 club and 3 diamond tricks. Partner's inability to ask for a Spade suggests declarer also has AK of Spades (partner would signal for spades with a King over the Queen in dummy in case you have J10). So that's 10 tricks. If declarer has AK of Hearts as well it's game over. So you try the seven of Hearts and partner, after a lot of thought plays the ten. Declarer wins with the Jack and cashes the Ace of Hearts and 12 tricks for 100% top. (Press Show All Hands to see)
Partner's view was that the seven didn't bode well for holding an honour and if declarer held AQJ then playing the King gifted 3 tricks easily. It's easy to debate that point and say well if declarer has AQ then twelve tricks are there anyway. So play the King in case. It's also true that a passive (non-heart) lead would carry no risk.
But Hugh Kelsey would argue that you have an opportunity, and a duty, to help partner in these situations. You know that if partner doesn't have the Ace or King of Hearts it's all over. But partner doesn't know that. They might think you hold King of Spades for example. Or even a club stop. Help them out. If your analysis is so correct there is no harm in leading the Queen of Hearts yourself. Then partner can't go wrong.
To Love and To Cherish. |
|
|
|
|
| Bidding Challenges over 1NT |
|
This hand from the EBED Pairs on Monday 5th September offers some thoughts on competitive bidding situations over an opening 1NT, a very common situation.
Firstly as West do you open 1NT or 1♦ (assuming you play a Weak NT)? Generally it is seen as better to open 1NT, especially as 1 of a suit should promise 7 losers and 1NT may pre-empt opponent's overcalls in the majors. Partner bids 2♦ so what does South do?
|
|
|
|
|
| Defending 3NT |
|
This is hand 23 from Thursday 4th August 2016. You are West.
After opponents opening (weak) 1NT, you try a 2C bid showing the majors. But North bids 3NT over you and that ends the auction. On lead, you try a not unreasonable 10 of Hearts. Dummy goes down and the Jack of Hearts wins the trick, the King of Spades is then played, partner follows with 4, declarer the 9.
How do you proceed?
|
|
The key to this hand is counting tricks and points.
You can be sure partner has not got the Ace of Hearts from the 1st trick. And, unless he is a maniac, declarer has the Queen of Spades also. Indeed in Spades, partner's 4 probably indicates three cards in the suit (check if declarer would open 1NT with 5 spades just to be sure). So that means declarer started with 3 spades, the Queen, the (played) 9 and one other, presumably either 10 or Jack. With Q109 he would be more likely to lead towards the King so a good chance he has QJ9.
Now why is he developing Spades? In addition to 3 heart tricks, he is creating 1 or probably 2 more spade tricks.It suggests he must have 4 or 5 immediately cash-able tricks in a minor to mess around in your suit. Well it can't be clubs as you have the queen as cover. It must be diamonds.
You can now count 11 of declarer's points, if declarer has Ace of Hearts, Queen, Jack of Spades and the Ace of Diamonds. He can't have the Ace of Clubs and, if he has the King, he can't have the Jack too (although then 3NT is unbeatable).
So lead a Club and I would advocate laying down the Queen. The danger is if you lead a low club and partner wins with the Ace they may think you want a spade back. Remove all doubt.
At the table partner actually played the Ace of Spades and another Heart. Declarer ran 9 tricks for a top, when the Ace of Spades could have been followed by 4 club tricks, as partner had the Ace, King to 4 clubs. Oh well! |
|
|
|
|
| Gambling 3NT |
|
Many players have this bid in their system but it rarely comes up. South on Board 15 on 4th August picks up 8 clubs to AKQ and nothing better than an outside Jack. If you do bid 3NT a number of challenges may follow.
First what do you do as North (partner)? It seems reasonable to pass, partner has long diamonds (!), you at least have one diamond as an entry, and it may be unlucky if opponents can make 5 tricks before you make 9.
What is East's bid? Do you play double for penalties (partner then has to lead spades or diamonds for 2 off and +500) or for takeout (partner will bid 4 diamonds which may be raised to 5)? Or do you remove the doubt and jump to 5 Diamonds anyway?
Bidding diamonds will startle North into further thought. Partner's suit is apparently now clubs, so is 5 Diamonds making? Is 6 Clubs a good sacrifice, despite the adverse vulnerability? Two pairs bid 6 Clubs doubled at the table for one off -200.
So it hangs on whether 5 Diamonds can make. Pairs on 4th August made 9 tricks, computer says 10 tricks. Can it be made (see answer)?
|
|
5 Diamonds may make if opponents are not awake, almost by playing naturally at the table. Let's assume it's played by West (it makes little difference).
Assuming a club lead, declarer will ruff and take out the outstanding 2 trumps in one round. On leading a spade towards dummy, most North players will split the King and Queen (again it doesn't matter much) so assume declarer ducks this. North wins, but has to lead a spade back as to lead Hearts or Clubs will concede the contract. Declarer can finesse the Jack of Spades and (even though a free finesse of the 8 is available), cash Ace of Spades and trump the final spade. Then lead a heart towards the King which wins (North has to have the Ace on the bidding). Now, unless South discards their Jack of Hearts on this trick, not easy, when dummy plays another low heart, South plays the Jack and West can play low (not impossible if West has been counting South's cards). There is no point Declarer playing the Queen of Hearts (you know North has the Ace). With nothing but clubs left, South is forced to concede a ruff and discard for EW to make game and +500.
So if this happens 6 Clubs doubled minus 1 may be good after all. It's one danger of bidding pre-emptively, opponents get a very good count of the hand.
|
|
|
|
|