 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| Hand of the Week, 5/18/2013 |
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday morning, May 15, board 17.
Auction with North Dealer: 1d - 1h - 1s -2h
3c - 3h -3NT all pass
This hand contains a fairly common card-combination problem, yet more than half the declarers in both the open and limited games got it wrong, and went down in a cold game.
West led the Queen of hearts.
First of all, there is no reason to duck this trick. You can lose two spades and a diamond, but if diamonds and clubs come in, you won't have any other losers. Why give them a heart trick, too? (And if they don't take their spades, one of those losers may disappear as well.) The duck of a heart would only make sense if West can win two diamond tricks, and East had no spade entry, not likely on the bidding. (East overcalled and rebid hearts missing the AKQ and probably the J of the suit. Surely she has a spade honor.)
Okay, so you win the first heart, and that brings us to the crux of the hand. How do you play diamonds for just one loser? (If you lose two diamonds, they will be able to get three heart tricks as well.)
If the missing diamonds are divided 3-2, it doesn't much matter what you do. But if they are 4-1, you can still pick up the suit if East has four to the queen.So you check to make sure there are no entry problems to either hand, and enter dummy with the king of clubs. Then lead a low diamond toward the jack. If it loses to West's queen, you are back to hoping for a 3-2 diamond break, but playing East for queen-fourth, gave you an extra chance, which on this hand of the week, turned out to be critical..
This could hardly even be called a safety play, because there is almost no distribution of the missing diamond cards that will allow you to lose no diamond tricks. (More on this later.)
Some might ask what happens if West had a singleton queen. Then it would have been right to play a high diamond first. True, but the suggested line of play works whenever west has a singleton 3, 4, 9, or 10. Thus it is four times more likely than him having precisely a singleton Q. It sometimes may turn out to be wrong, but all you can do is make the play that gives you the greatest chance of success.
Incidentally, at trick two,when you lead a low club to the board, be mindful of your table presence. Try not to act like you expect it to win. You're not allowed to decieve the opponents by being overly dramatic about it, but at least show some interest in what card East plays. Remember, the opponents are taking inferences from every card you play, as well as your attitude.
Despite your manner, East should probably figure out you have the ace of clubs, but you never know. At our table, after getting in with the queen of diamonds, East led another heart, when she should have known that a spade trick was going away. She knew declarer had the AK of hearts from the opening lead, and she can see five diamond tricks and four club trick in dummy. Thus if she wanted her two spade tricks, she better take them NOW!
One last note. Going back to the diamond suit card combination, there is one precise defensive holding where you can legitimately take all six diamond tricks. If West had exactly Q43 and East had exactly 109, you can lead the jack from your hand, finessing West's Q. Such a precise holding is unlikely, and I would only play for it to be that way if I was desperate, and couldn't afford any diamonds losers. (It doesn't work if East has the singleton 9 or 10 as West can insure a diamond trick by not covering.)
Lesson points:
.
1. With AKxxxx opposite Jx, the best way to play for only one loser in the suit is to lead low towards the jack. (You're going to have to lose one one trick in the suit anyway, no matter what you do, and this gives you an extra chance to avoid two losers.)
2. Try not to reveal your card holdings by your table manner. It is unethical to put on an act, but if you are too cavalier, or act too worried, you may be giving valuable information to the opponents. When you lead up to a king, your manner should be the same whether you have the ace in your hand, or whether the contract depends on the ace being on-side.
3. Count declarer's tricks on defense. Today's East should have known to cash out after winning the queen of diamonds.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, 5/3/2013 KO Match
This hand is from the finals of the Friday 5/3/2013 KO at the Austin sectional. The play is trivial as long as no one ruffs the opening lead so we will focus on the bidding. South opens 2C. Is his hand worth a 2C opener? With spades trump, it has 9 winners: 7 spades, 1 diamond, and 1 club. Yes, it is worth a 2C opener. The 2D response showed at least a king, a treatment that is popular with many players. Now the jump to 3S. That bid (the jump after opening 2C) is reserved for a hand where you know what the trump suit is and all you really want to know is if partner has an ace (or two). Bidding 3S says spades are trump and asks do you have any aces? Partner cue bids his cheapest ace (and if he doesn’t have an ace bids 3NT). North bids 4C showing the A of clubs. South now bids 4D showing the A of diamonds. North is out of aces but has a useful king in the diamond suit (he thinks it is useful since partner cue bid the ace of diamonds) so he bids 5D. To reiterate, the 5D bid denies the A of hearts and shows the K of diamonds. South can now count 12 tricks if North’s clubs are at least 3 cards long: 7 spades, 2 diamonds (the A and K), and 3 clubs (the A, K, and Q). Also, South knows that there is not a grand slam since he has a singleton heart and partner has denied the A of hearts. South ends the auction by bidding 6S. Congratulations, you have just bid a 25 HCP slam.
Lessons:
- The jump to 3 of a Major after a 2C opener sets the Major as trump and asks partner if he has any aces - it typically shows a suit that is either solid or at least has good play to not have a loser opposite a small singleton. This is a very useful treatment when you hold a strong distributional hand. Be sure to discuss this treatment with partner before springing it on him.
- High card points do not take any tricks. High card points are often a good indicator of the trick taking value of a hand but, in the case of distributional hands, some other method of evaluation will work better. In the above auction, we counted tricks.
- Not all slams take 33 points. High card points are most useful in NT.
- If you can count tricks during the bidding, it is the best method of evaluating the potential of the two hands.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Rosemary Kelley |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday April 30,2013, Board 16
Possible Auction:
N E S W
1S
1N 2S 2N* Pass
3C Pass 3H Pass
Pass 4H All Pass
Opening Lead: King of Spades
BIDDING COMMENTARY:
North and South play conventions on after a 1NT overcall so Lebensohl was available to South.
South's 2NT bid is a relay to 3C. South could now pass, bid a new suit at the 3 level or bid 3NT. The new suit bid of 3 Hearts shows a hand with fewer than 8 points and a 5+ card suit. Basically, a “drop dead” bid—“This is where we are playing the hand. I have no interest in game.” For a full description of the bid, Google Lebensohl and choose an explanation of the Convention over 1NT interference or go to http://www.bridgebum.com/lebensohl_after_1nt.php for a full explanation.
After South shows the Heart suit, North has reason to believe that the hand could actually make 4 Hearts with as little as x Kxxxx xxx Jxxx. All of North's values seem to be “working” and well placed behind the opener. Suit by suit this means:
Spades: South should have no more than 1 Spade and therefore no losers in that suit.
Hearts: Even missing the King in the South hand, a finesse against West for the King could easily bring this suit in for no losers.
Diamonds: Exactly 2 losers here.
Clubs: With the Ace or Jack onside (in the West hand) only 1 loser here. As long as South can reach her hand and figure out which is “onside.”
With no high cards in the South hand, but entries, via Spade ruffs, to lead the Hearts and Clubs it looks like 10 tricks are very possible.
LEAD COMMENTARY:
Pretty obvious.
PLAY COMMENTARY:
South realizes the need for entries to her hand and should start by ruffing the first Spade in her hand. She needs 3 trumps for ruffing so would like the Hearts to break 2/2 but might be able to handle a 3/1. At trick 2, lead the Jack of Hearts. If covered, return to hand with the 10 of Hearts. If not lead a Club toward dummy. East would do well to duck, but most players will win the Ace and lead the Queen of Diamonds. South will duck this. The 10 of Diamonds next (West knows East has the Jack so the 10 lets West know about that card also) and another duck by South. Now East will probably shift back to Spades. South should win the Ace in dummy and play the Ace of Hearts. Now a second Spade ruff to hand and lead a third round of Diamonds. If the Ace falls, you are home free. Return with the last Spade ruff and pitch the 10 of Clubs from dummy on the King of Diamonds. If the Ace does not appear, use that last ruff to hand to do the Club finesse.
It is right to try the Diamond FIRST!! If you do the Club finesse first and it loses, you will already be down!! If you do the Diamond first and it does not work, you can still do the Club finesse later. Wouldn't you feel awful if East had the Jack of Clubs but West had the Axx of Diamonds and you went down??!!
Pointers from this hand:
-
When you have two chances to make a bid, do first the one that will not result in a loser if it doesn't work. In this hand, that is the ruffing out the Diamond Ace. Whenever possible, a finesse should wait until all other avenues have been exhausted.
-
When deciding whether to bid on or not, try considering the most likely arrangement of the missing cards, both high card and length and see what would be necessary for a bid to be “right.” This works well when trying to decide whether a sacrifice is right, whether game is possible when partner preempts, as well as whether it is right to compete one more level or bid a game or slam. CAUTION: Don't look with rose-colored glasses and hope that everything is just perfect when that is what it would take. Look at the situation reasonably and allow for a flaw or two in the plan.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday Morning, 4/24/2013, Board 27.
You pick up the east hand and happily count seven hearts headed by the KQJ, a perfect 3h opener. Alas, you're in 4th seat. Still, you look forward to bidding some number of hearts.
South opens a spade, partner passes, and north raises to two spades. Now what? You would have opened with a bid of three hearts, so do you bid three hearts now ? Four hearts? Pass, despite a good seven-card suit?
Before we answer that question, let's remember why we preempt.
1. It makes life hard for the opponents. If they enter the bidding, they have to do so at a high level, and they have little room to exchange information. They are forced to guess, and we hope they guess wrong.
2. It gives partner a relatively accurate picture of your hand. Partner is in a good position to judge whether to pass, bid game, slam, double, or sacrifice.
As a side note, that is the reason players are admonished not to bid again once they've preempted. Partner is in a better position to judge what to do next. You've done your job. You forced the opponents to guess. You hope they guessed wrong. Don't give them another chance to get it right.
What are the negatives to preempting?
1. The hand may be a misfit. You may be going down in three hearts, perhaps doubled, when the opponents can't make anything.
2. It may help the opponents better evaluate their hands in the bidding.
3. If the oppoents buy the contract, it may help the declarer play the hand.
Now let's return to the case at point. If you choose to bid three or four hearts, none of the positives remain. The opponents have already exchanged information, so they are in a good position to judge whether to bid on or double. Meanwhile, your partner has no idea what kind of hand you have. For example, if the opponents bid four spades and your partner doubles, will you leave it in? Partner surely expects you to have at least one or two defesive tricks in your hand, when you may have zero. Now, instead of forcing the opponents to guess, you're the one having to guess.
Sure you might get lucky and guess right. Maybe this is a hand where they can make four spades, and five hearts doubled is only down two. But, in the long run, we all do better if we avoid unilateral bids and guesses, and allow our partners to be in on the decisions.
Therefore, the recommended bid is pass, and if they bid on to four spades, to pass again. At least you haven't clued declarer in on the possible bad break in the spade suit.
What happened in real life? Four or five hearts went down doubled on several occasions. Three spades doubled by South made 3. (No doubt the doubler expected his partner to have something for this 3-heart bid.) And for those Easts who kept quiet (we think), four spades went down two, thanks to the not-all-that-surprising (if East bids 3H) bad break in spades.
Lesson Points: Just because you have a hand that is worth a preemptive opening, doesn't mean you should bid it later, especially after the opponents have already exchanged information.
Before jumping into the bidding, think about what your bid might possibly gain. What are the upsides? What are the downsides?
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 2, Friday April 19, 2013
North South Vulnerable, Dealer East
Namyats spells Stayman backwards, however the person who invented this convention was Victor Mitchell who was a partner of Sam Stayman! It was originally called Mitchell Transfers back in the 1960's. Many times the inventor of a convention does not get credit and a perfect example is the Stayman convention which was invented by George Rapee! In both instances Stayman wrote about the conventions and got credit for both!
In this highly distributional hand, East was the dealer and passed and South decided to use Namyats on this borderline hand and bid 4 Diamonds. A Namyats hand shows one of the majors (and is a transfer bid and is alertable); a 4 Club bid shows you have a Heart hand and a 4 Diamond bid shows you have Spades. It should be a very solid suit and a hand with about 4 or 4 1/2 losers. Typically, you have a hand about 1 trick better than a preemptive bid of 4 of the suit. In this case, the hand has a hole in the long suit (however this suit is one longer than necessary) and 4 other losers. West came in and bid 4 Hearts and now North was happy to bid 4 Spades. East woke up and bid 5 Hearts and now the Namyats bidder bid 5 Spades! West passed, North passed (however thought a while about 6) and East passed and quickly got a Heart on the table for the opening lead.
There isn't much to the play now as declarer (North) pitched a Diamond at trick one off dummy, picked up the outstanding trumps and got the Ace of Clubs out and claimed after a diamond was taken. West was not happy and said that without Namyats he would have been on lead and certainly was leading his Diamonds and setting the hand!
Hearts are a great save for East West on this hand and they should keep on bidding to the 6 level with the favorable vulnerability. The top board for East West was 5 Hearts making and a near top was 5 Hearts undoubled down 3 (and even if it were doubled it would still be still a good sacrifice). The top board for North South was 5 Spades making by 2 declarers.
As for Namyats, it prevailed on this hand beautifully! This bid is also very useful to get to slams as it is so descriptive and most often exact on the losers. When responder bids the slot suit instead of the indicated major, it show some degree of slam interest.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand #3, April 12, 2013
A hand where the entire field got to slam and nearly half the pairs got to a cold Grand Slam! Not bad - but why didn't everyone get to the Grand?
Let's look at the suggested auction. After South opens 1S, North looks at her hand and realizes it is a 3 loser hand if partner has a fit for one of her minor suits (1 loser in spades, 1 in diamonds and 1 in clubs, using the "Loser Count" methodology). When North hears South raise 2 Diamonds (a game forcing 2/1 bid) to 3D she knows 2 things: there is at least a 6-4 fit in diamonds making it legitimate to consider loser count and partner has a good opening hand in support of diamonds - most partnerships agree that after a 2/1 response a bid on the 3-level shows a good opener or a good fit.
Loser count now suggests the partnership has a total of 9 or 10 losers (a good opening hand can be counted on to have a 7 or even a 6 loser count). So, there ought to be more than enough tricks for a grand slam in diamonds, provided the partnership is not missing any key cards. Loser count suggests the contract level you can make is 18 - the total partnership loser count. In this case, that is more than needed for a Grand Slam!
North need only check for key cards by bidding 4NT (or 4D Minorwood, if played by the partnership). When South shows 2 aces, North can bid the Grand.
Where did more than half of the field go wrong? My guess is they started cue bidding after the 3D raise and possibly South took control and placed the hand in 6D. Or, North did not use loser count and failed to see how many tricks were likely to be available even if South had only as little as Axxxx, xxx, Axxx, x. And remember, South promised a much better hand than that with the 3D bid.
It is instructive to look at how accurate the total loser count of 9 really is on this deal. North can easily make 13 tricks by pulling 2 rounds of trumps and ruffing 3 clubs in dummy. But, it is also possible (although a foolish, risky way to play the hand) to take a backward spade finesse and later ruff another spade setting up dummy's 5th spade. This leads to a total of 15 possible winners in the hand - just as predicted by loser count calculations.
Lessons
1. Loser count is a reasonably accurate tool for evaluating slam potential - this is especially true if you have a super trump fit and sources of tricks.
2. Make sure you are not missing key cards when using loser count.
3. When all you need to know is partner's total of key cards and it is safe to bid Blackwood or Minorwood without running the risk of getting too high, don't start cue bidding. Partner might take control of the hand when you should be in the driver's seat!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Friday, 4/5/2013, Board # 14
A hand where all North/South's bid slam, for a change! But 3 pairs were in 6S (a 5 - 5 fit) making 6 while 2 pairs were in 6H (a 6 - 2 fit) making 7. Explaining the difference in contracts and results is the theme of this week's hand.
After East passes, South has to decide between opening 1S with her 5 card major and 1NT with her semi-balanced 15 points. A few decades ago the prevailing wisdom was to open the 5 card major, especially with no stopper in one suit (diamonds) and only a doubleton Q in the heart suit. Nowadays, many experts feel you should show your NT point range on all such hands to solve later bidding problems. Also, there are ways to show your 5-card major later, at least when partner has a game going hand and uses "puppet" Stayman.
What happens after a 1NT opening? West interferes using a unusual 2NT bid for the minors. North now has no easy way to show both hearts and spades and may just transfer to 4H and then bid Blackwood and end up dummy in 6H. Or North may bid 3H and end up declarer in 6H. When North was declarer, East led his singleton spade hoping to later get a spade ruff. When South was declarer, West expected the KD to be in declarer's hand because of the NT opening and led the club 3. In both cases, declarer made 7H.
When South opened 1S, the contract ended up in 6S after an auction such as shown (with 6C showing 1 keycard in spades). West saw no reason not to lead the A of diamonds and declarer was held to 6.
What is the morale of this story? One hand will not settle the debate about whether to open 1NT or 1S with the South hand. But the "Gods of Bridge" on this hand clearly wanted to punish the 1S openers and reward the 1NT bidders!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saturday, March 16, 2013 Board 5
North was the dealer and opened 1 Spade rather than 1 No Trump with his 5-2-2-4 distribution. The ACBL has recently given its blessing to opening 1 No Trump with two doubletons - however, with the strength in the Spade suit, a 1 Spade opening looks more inviting. East now threw a wrench in the works with a 3 Heart bid!
South has to consider his options and some of the newer players that don't play negative doubles decided to bid 3 No Trump. However if you do play negative doubles, this is a perfect hand for it! West passes and now North decides between 4 Clubs or 3 No Trump. Knowing that partner should have a minimum of 10 points helps him to try a 3 No Trump bid with his 16 high card points. East passes (he has done his damage!) and now South should raise to 4 No Trump (inviting to 6 No Trump). North happily goes to 6 No Trump!
Now the play, with North declarer, depends on what East leads. With a Heart out there is a play for 7 and without a Heart out, 6 looks like a sure thing. We can count 5 Diamonds, 4 Clubs, 1 Heart (or 2 with the Heart out) and 1 Spade. How can we even think of taking all the tricks?
What if the preemptor also has the Spades? Now when we get down to the final Diamond (we have run all the Clubs and cashed our Ace of Hearts if they led a Heart) and come down to a 3 card ending with 3 Spades in declarer's hand and dummy (South) holding the last good Diamond, a small Spade and a Heart. Dummy leads the Ace of Diamonds (last Diamond) and declarer discards the Jack of Spades. Now RHO must discard either his last Heart or one of his Spades and declarer can make all the tricks. The end position is shown below:
AQJ
out
out
out
542 KT
out K
out out
out out
8
4
A
out
In the actual game in Flight A only one pair reached a small slam and that pair also made 7. In the Limited Game, again only one pair reached a small slam and that pair made 6.
The lesson from this hand is that many decisions are made on every deal and each decision you make needs to be weighed to see what is the most descriptive and best fitting for that hand. On this hand the players used the Negative Double, the Quantitative raise to 4 No Trump, the Preempt, and the Squeeze!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand # 1, Thursday Morning, 3/21/2013
North-South failed to reach a cold slam. Look at the bidding and decide who is at fault. Who made the worst bid?
First, let 's admit this is a very hard hand to bid. Most pairs played it in five diamonds, and I'm sure they all felt bad about it. North has a hard time evaluating her hand. Five diamonds to the ace is huge, but a void in partner's first suit is not so hot. And she has no way of knowing if her king of spades is any good. And from south's point of view, he could be off the ace and king of spades, and the ace of diamonds. He needs partner to have two of those three cards.
So who made the worst bid?
West.
What did he hope to gain by doubling five clubs, except to tell himself what to lead? All it did was give North-South an extra chance to find the slam. If South was worried about wasted club cards in the North, West's double helped alleviate that fear.
Who made the second worst bid?
North. She didn't take advantage of West's double.
North knew she might be missing a slam, but she wasn't ready to bid six herself. A pass would have relayed that information.
When partner makes a game try, or in this case, a slam try, and the opponents make an intervening bid, you have several choices. You can accept by bidding game (or slam). You can decline, by bidding your suit below game (or slam.) Or you can pass, which says I think game (or slam) is still a possibilty, but I'm not sure.
For example, suppose the bidding goes 1ST by partner, 2S by you, and partner makes a game-try by bidding 3C. Then an opponent bids 3H in front of you. You can double for penatly. You can accept game by bidding 4S. You can reject game by bidding 3S,(Partner had already forced you the the three-level.) Or you can pass, and let partner know you're still possibly interested..Passing is stronger than bidding.
In the case at point, South had already forced to five diamonds. His five club bid was a slam-try. North didn't know what to do, but once West doubled, she should have passed. It shows a stronger hand than bidding five diamonds. If North had passed, South could have bid six diamonds on his own, or redoubled to show a void. The redouble should probably encourage North to go on to six, but like I said at the top, it's a hard hand to bid. Bidding five diamonds was the weakest bid she could have made.
I asked resident world-champion Tobi Sokolow how she would have bid the hand (without the double). Her reply: 1H-1S, 3D-4D, 4H-4S, 5C-6D. Easy for her to say. Helps to have partners you can trust not to take the 4H or 4S bids as natural, and that you know you may be cue-bidding kings. For the rest of us, it's a lot tougher.
Lesson points: When the opponents are bidding their way to a possible game or slam, don't throw in superfluous bids or doubles. You may only be helping them.
When you're in some kind of invitational auction, and the opponents make an intervening bid, if you're not willing to accept the invite, passing says you may still be interested. Bidding at the lower level is weaker than passing.
(Note that doesn't apply if the opponents bid is above your safe level. For example if partner invites game in hearts, and those nasty opponents bid 3S, you no longer can show the in-betweener. All you can do is bid game yourself, pass to say you're not interested, or double for penalty.)
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3/13/2013 Wednesday Morning, Board 18
The recommended auction is 1N (E) 4C (W) 4S (E) 5C (W) 5S (E) 7NT (W).
The hand of the week this week is a lesson in bidding since the play when hearts break 3-2 is trivial as there are 14 tricks off top (6 hearts, 4 spades, 2 clubs, and 2 diamonds).
It is easy to see when you look at both hands that 7NT is where you should play it but how can you determine that during the bidding? Let's start with a thesis. With a six card suit headed by the AKQ, responder should think NT, not a suit. Even if the suit is a Major, responder should still think NT because those tricks are just as good in NT as they are in a suit contract.
Responder knows the suit is running because opener has at least two of that suit (of course, if opener has only 2 of the suit, he needs a 3-2 break for the suit to be running but that is a 68.7% situation). If opener has 2 aces, responder can count 6 heart tricks, 3 (or possibly 4) spade tricks, 1 club trick, and 1 diamond trick which adds to 11 tricks and we have accounted for only 8 of opener's (minimum) 15 HCP. If opener has 1 king, that gets us to 12 tricks and still only accounts for 11 HCP. Of course, if opener has 2 kings, responder can count 13 tricks.
So, how should the hand be bid? I recommend that you bid 4C (Gerber) over 1N, never mentioning your heart suit. Opener responds 4S which shows 2 aces and with some partnerships shows a minimum hand. Even with a minimum, we can count 11 tricks as described above. Let's ask for kings by bidding 5C. Opener now shows 2 kings and we can count 13 tricks without worrying about what else opener has (3 spades, 6 hearts, 2 clubs, and 2 diamonds). Bid 7N and let partner sweat it out until she sees dummy.
Consider though, what might happen if hearts are not 3-2 (a 31.3% chance). Even with that, opener might have a play for 13 tricks. Let's look at the actual hand. If hearts are not 3-2, declarer has 4 spade tricks, 3 heart tricks, 2 diamond tricks, and 2 club tricks which gets us to 11. If you can guess clubs, that gets you to 12 and based on the two previous hands of the week, you know that if you can get to 12 tricks, there might be a squeeze for 13 tricks.
Another thing to think about wduring the bidding is that opener might have the J of hearts so that the only thing that scuttles the grand is a 5-0 break (3.9%). All in all, bidding the grand is a very good proposition. If all my grand slams (or small slams or games) were a 68.7% proposition, I could quit my day job and play money bridge for a living.
Lessons.
1. When you hold a six card suit headed by the AKQ and you know partner has at least two, consider using that suit in NT rather than the suit itself.
2. If a grand slam is better than a 68.7% chance as in this hand, it is a very profitable idea to bid the grand slam.
3. When you hold a six card suit as in this hand, another reason to bid the grand slam in NT rather than the suit is that if the suit does not break, you know you are going down if you are in a suit but if you are in NT, there may be other chances.
4. When you know you want to play in a slam (small or grand) and all you need to know is how many aces (and/or kings) partner has, bid Gerber (or RKC or Blackwood whatever you and your partner use to ask for aces and kings in this kind of situation) to ask for those aces and kings. Don't muddy the water by bidding a suit or cue bidding. I have played too many slams in a 3-1 fit because partner didn't understand what I was doing !
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Rosemary Kelley |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday Morning, March 7th , Board 5
Opening Lead: Four of Clubs
BIDDING COMMENTARY:
This hand is mainly about the bidding. North is too good for a weak two opening and intends to bid 1D and then 2D to show the hand.
After South responds a Spade, West puts in a 2C bid, getting his side in the auction and giving East a lead director. North completes her plan with a 2D call.
East should probably bid 4 Clubs right now, but many players are timid about preempting in this spot and hope to buy the hand a little cheaper. Besides, South may repeat the Spades and now West would be happy to defend.
With the AJx of Diamonds and the Ace of Clubs to go with his Spades, South tries 3 NT.
East knows her partner passed, thinking East has some values and therefore West might be expecting to set this contract. Pulling it to 4 Clubs, East warns West that she lied the first time.
Now South should leave the next bid to North. The Pass by South is “forcing” requiring North to do something besides Pass. Five Diamonds would be a stretch and the Q of Clubs will be wasted in this contract (the lead will come from East). North should bid 4NT, knowing that South is likely to hold the Ace of Diamonds with one or two small ones. This is one time when this bid is “To Play”!!
LEAD COMMENTARY:
With 2 entries, West will try to set up his Club suit. Even if there are two Club stoppers in the N/S hands, there will be opportunity for 2 Leads and still have an Ace with which to get in to cash 3 Clubs.
PLAY COMMENTARY:
South plays the Queen of Clubs from dummy and counts his tricks. 6 Diamonds and 2 Clubs is 8 so he still needs 2 more. It is almost a sure thing that West has both major suit Aces. So South leads a Diamond to the Ace and then a small Heart toward dummy. If West rises, there are now 10 tricks for the taking. West should duck and hope there are no more entries to the South hand to repeat the “finesse.” Alas, another Diamond to the Jack does get South back to his hand to lead another Heart. West will probably win (not best) and clear the Clubs. South will now take 6 Diamonds, 3 Hearts and 2 Clubs, making 5. Note that 5 Diamonds, played by North, will go down on the Club lead from East.
Pointers from this hand:
-
A weak two Diamond bid should not have a four card major on the side, especially not a GOOD one. Even without the Queen of Clubs, this hand should open 1 Diamond.
-
Minor suit overcalls at the 2-level should be made with 6-card or longer suits. But a GOOD 5-card suit can be used if 2 of three reasons for overcalling are met.
-
If you have a preemptive raise, then that is what you should bid. Note that if East bids 4 Clubs the first time, South will have a harder time of it and may choose to bid 5 Diamonds. That is what preemptive bids are for—to make things more difficult for the opponents.
-
If West counts the tricks, he should know that winning the Ace of Hearts will give the opponents 11 tricks. If playing Matchpoints, it will be important to hold the contract to 10 tricks. South will not lead any more Hearts, but will surely take his 10 tricks and run.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 18, Wednesday Morning, 2/27/2013
Okay, you're going to say - really, another squeeze hand! But they do come up often, even if we miss many of them. And, when we see one and know it's happening, it is really one of the most enjoyable things the game of Bridge can offer.
First, the auction.
After East hears West's raise to 2H, he knew game was almost certain and there might even be a slam. The 3C bid was a "help suit" game try - just to see what West would do. When West raised clubs, East thought he could easily have good clubs and possibly a useful diamond holding. So, East cue bid his first round spade control with 4S. West now knows his spade A is much less valuable and signs off in 5H.
Now, the Play
South choose to lead the Q  . North won and led the K  . East pitched a club, reasoning that he could ruff his third diamond and if clubs split badly the 4th club might turn out to be a loser.
Now East played two rounds of trumps to protect against a ruff or over-ruff when he next played diamonds. Trumps split and the K  followed by a ruff of the 6  were the next two tricks. Declarer left dummy by leading a low spade and noted that North played the 10 and, after East ruffed, South played the 9  . It seemed likely that North held all the remaining high spades.
This is the point in the hand to do some counting. North has shown 1 diamond, 2 hearts and probably 7 spades. That means North has at least 3 clubs and also might have to guard against dummy's 7  winning a trick. North can be squeezed!
Here's how to proceed: Just play off all your trumps pitching down to the K9 of clubs and the 7 of spades in dummy (the A106 of clubs are left in your hand). Watch for the Q, J and 8 of spades - if they are discarded then dummy's 7  will be good. If a high spade is still in a defender's hand, play to the K  and back to your A  . North will have to throw a small club on the last trump play and all your 3 clubs will score.
The requirements to successfully pull off this squeeze are: one defender has key holdings in two suits (spades and clubs in this hand) and has to give up control in one of these suits when you play the final trump squeeze card. In addition, you must have (and preserve) entries to get back and forth to cash whatever card becomes good.
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Board 14, 4/5/2013
A slam hand where every pair bid the slam for a change!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Friday, 4/5/2013, Board # 14
|
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 13, Wednesday Morning, 3/13/2013
The Bidding
West's response to 1C of 3NT showed a balanced hand without a 4 card major with 13 - 15 high card points. East, with 18 high card points and most likely running clubs knows a slam is a strong possibility. East's bid of 4NT asks partner to bid on if he likes his hand for slam. West, with a near maximum for his bid and 2 four card suits and a possibly valuable 10 of hearts, accepts the slam try by bidding 6NT. Note that West could also have accepted the slam try by bidding his number of aces with a 5D Blackwood response.
The Play
North led the 5S, a lead of second highest from a long, weak suit (this is a popular lead for many players when no other better lead is clearly available). Declarer won the 10S in hand with the QS and counted tricks. Eleven tricks were clearly there and a 12th could come from either hearts (with a finesse) or diamonds. In order to score 3 diamond tricks, however, the defense would have to help by pitching diamonds or rising AD when dummy's singleton was led.
Declarer (Richard Frankeny) decided to play clubs first to see what the defense threw. South signaled positively in diamonds and North threw 2 diamonds on the 3rd and fourth club. On the fifth club, with South having pitched a spade and a heart, Declarer decided to rely an the heart finesse and pitched a diamond. North signaled he had a heart card.
Declarer now led a diamond from dummy and South played the A and led the 8 of hearts. Here's the layout at this point (with declarer shifted to the bottom position).
AK7
Q53
-
-
932 10
K4 876
10 63
- -
4
AJ10
KQ
-
Declarer could have continued to rely on the heart finesse - but instead decided to believe North's heart signal and rose AH. On the KD North could follow suit but when the QD was played North felt the pain of a simple squeeze - if he threw a spade declarer would pitch dummy's QH and all of dummy's spades would be good. If he pitched the KH, dummy's QH would give declarer 12 tricks.
Well done Richard, but no thanks for squeezing me!
Lessons
1) Sometimes signaling correctly can help an alert declarer as much or more than the defense.
2) Even if it is hard to visualize a final squeeze position, good things can still happen automatically when you run off all your winners.
Final Comment
Can you see how South could have defeated the contract after taking the AD? Say South then leads the 10S instead of the 8H. Declarer wins in dummy and has no way to run his diamond winners and then get back to dummy. The critical entry needed for the squeeze to succeed has been taken away. This entry removal is a key play in squeeze defense - but squeeze defense is one of the most difficult areas of defender play. Few defenders even suspect a squeeze is coming until it is too late.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 21, Saturday afternoon, February 16
Suggested auction: 2 passes to 1C by S, double by W, 2H by E, 4C by W, 4H by E, 5C by W, 5D by E, 5NT by W, 6H by E. Opening lead: A of clubs.
An interesting hand in that a grand in either hearts or spades is on the heart finesse. Not that anyone should be in a grand when a winning finesse is required but surely you should be in a small slam when you are on a finesse for a grand. The interesting thing about this hand is that it was played 16 times and no pair bid a slam. Yes, EW has only 27 HCP but, remember, point count is only a guideline and points have never taken even one trick.
The suggested auction starts with a club opening bid by S in third chair. W has too powerful a hand for just a one spade overcall so W should double expecting to bid spades next to show her powerful hand and suit. But, surprise of surprise, E bids 2H which shows about 10 HCP and hearts. Now W has another problem in that when E bids hearts, it seems that hearts is a better place to play the hand no matter what spades E has. How should W show her super heart support and powerful hand? I suggest a bid of 4C which is a splinter bid in support of hearts showing shortness (singleton or void) in clubs and support for hearts. A splinter bid is, by its very nature, a slam try since if W was not interested in a slam, she would just bid 4H. The point of a splinter bid is to show partner your distribution so that partner can better evaluate her hand. For example, if E had no wasted HCs in the club suit, her hand is better than if she has wasted cards in clubs.
With her hand, E is not interested in co-operating with W’s quest for slam since the splinter has made 2 of her points useless and she has no controls so she bids 4H. W still has slam interest because of how powerful her hand is. A good question to ask yourself is what does partner need so that she has a decent play for slam. On this hand, W thinks if partner has the KQ of hearts, the play for slam is excellent and the play for a grand slam in hearts is very reasonable. And that is only 5 points and partner has shown 10 or so. Therefore, W should make another slam try.
W bids 5C to show first round control in clubs, most likely a void (I don’t like splintering with a stiff A). Now E wakes up because if partner is still interested in slam, she has a pretty good hand given her bidding up to this point. E needs to do something to say that if W is still interested in slam, she is now willing to cooperate. But what should E do? E should bid 5D which must be second round control since she denied the A of diamonds when she returned to 4H after partner splintered. W is now going to bid the small slam - but why not try for the grand slam since if E has the KQ of hearts, the play for a grand must be decent.
W bids 5NT which is the grand slam force. It asks a simple question: do you have 2 of the top 3 honors in our agreed to trump suit? If so, bid the grand. If not, bid 6 of our agreed trump suit. In this case, E would bid 6H and W would pass since she wants to only play a grand if partner has both the K and the Q of hearts. As an aside, take a look at the two hands changing the diamond K to the heart K. The grand is almost lay down if that were the hand.
The play of the hand is trivial since the only question is who has the K of hearts. Ruff the opening lead of the club A, cross to the diamond K and lead the Q of hearts. You make 7 if the finesse wins and 6 if it loses.
Lessons:
1 Point count is only a guideline. When you have a powerful distributional hand, then point count is not as important as where the points are. On this hand, W can see that the hand will have a very reasonable play for a grand slam in hearts if partner has only the KQ of hearts so W has to arrange the auction to work toward the goal of finding out if partner has those cards.
2 A splinter bid is an excellent tool to express a powerful hand and support for partner. In this hand, W has excellent support for partner’s heart suit and shortness in clubs. A splinter in clubs expresses that and helps E to evaluate her hand. A splinter bid is a slam try since there is no reason to splinter if you are going to just bid game.
3. Even when you don’t get much cooperation from partner, sometimes your hand is so powerful, you have to continue to explore for slam. W’s hand is so powerful that she doesn’t need much from partner to make a small slam and really not much to make a grand slam.
4 When you find a fit, there is no reason to muddy the water by introducing your own suit. When I discussed this hand with several players, some bid spades even though partner had shown hearts. This avenue didn’t answer the questions that W needed answering and, in fact, made it more difficult to find the cold slam.
5. 5NT after you and partner have found and agreed upon a suit asks partner a very specific question: do you have 2 of the top 3 honors in our suit? It is called the Grand Slam Force since if partner has the 2 you are asking for, she is going to bid the grand slam.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday morning, Feb 7, 2013. Board 3
Auction: 1d - p -2nt - all pass
Opening lead: Six of hearts
I was North, declaring the hand. While it is usually right to lead "fourth from your longest and strongest" against a no trump contract, the bidding suggested that I had four or more clubs (since I didn't have a major to bid), so one can certainly understand the passive lead of the six of hearts.
I won the heart lead in dummy with the ace, and led a low diamond to the ten.
What was my plan?. Clearly I wanted to set up dummy's diamonds, and seemed to have sufficient entries.
Mark Craig, sitting East, let the ten of diamonds win without any hesitation.
Now I was in something of a pickle. It was difficult to untangle my hearts, and repeat the diamond finesse which I knew was working. I led a heart to the jack, and repeated the finesse.
Now East could win the queen, and return a club. I could still knock out the diamond ace, but the only way to get back to diamonds was to overtake my heart queen with the king. In effect, I was willing to give up one heart trick, in order to get two diamond tricks, and who knows, maybe I'd get lucky and hearts would break 3-3 after all.
Notice I wouldn't have had that problem if East had won the first diamond. I wouldn't have wasted an entry to repeat a finesse that was doomed to fail.
In fact, hearts did break 3-3 and I was able to make the contract.
That's the difference between writing a newspaper type bridge column, where you get to make up the hands, and writing a real life "hand of the week." If I got to make up the hands, I would have had hearts break 4-2.
In real life, East's fine play went unrewaded, but that shouldn't take away from it.
Nice play, Mark.
Lesson Points:
On defense, don't always be in a hurry to take your tricks. In this case, declarer had to use up a valuable entry to repeat a finesse that he expected to win. You won't always know what problems you may cause a declarer by ducking, but so long as you expect to win the trick later, it is usually right to duck.
If you choose to win the trick, you should already know what your going to lead. If you don't know what to lead, don't win a trick you can always win later.
Anticipate what declarer is going to do, and plan ahead. If it is right to duck, you have to be prepared to duck smoothly.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Rosemary Kelley |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday Morning, February 3, Board 13
Opening Lead: Spade Eight
BIDDING COMMENTARY:
Some Easts will choose not to open this hand. It is only 12 HCP with a flat distribution. Some of us were taught to deduct a point for this flatness, therefore leaving only 11 points. However, holding 7 cards in the majors and having 2 quick tricks tips the balance to opening this hand 1 Club. You can raise partner's major suit response or bid 1 NT on your next round to minimize your hand. Besides, if you start passing 12 HCP hands the card goddess may quit giving you any points!
After West's Spade bid, passed-hand North can show some values in the red suits by an “Unusual” NT call. This cannot be natural by a passed hand, when partner has also passed. East raises with 4 card support. As South is not vulnerable, has a fit for both of North's suits and has 2 Aces, she tries a 3 Heart call. West has a 7-loser hand in Spades and bids the Spade game.
LEAD COMMENTARY:
North has a tough lead. Many will lead a trump as a “passive” lead, in case the Heart King is in the West hand.
PLAY COMMENTARY:
After South wins the Ace of trumps, it is time to take stock. N/S has a 9 card Heart fit and an 8-card Diamond fit. West has very few red cards and quite a few black ones. There are no Diamond tricks to be had for the defense, since dummy (East) has the AK. It is possible that North is 5/5 or 4/5, in which case, West may may have 2 red singletons and be able to pitch a Heart on one of the high Diamonds. If there is a void in Hearts, in the West hand, a Heart lead needs to come from the South, so that is the switch. There is no need to lead any more trumps, as dummy is not ruffing anything anyway.
This is similar to last week's hand, in that if you stop to think how the play is going to go, you can usually get the defense right.
Now the defense will come to a Spade, a Heart and 2 Clubs and defeat this hand. Without the bid from North, South would not have such a clear picture of the distribution and may be tempted to try for a Club ruff, leading the Ace and the 3 when in with the Spade Ace. Now East will be able to cash 3 top Diamonds, pitching the losing Heart and making the hand.
Pointers from this hand
-
Make sure if you open a minimum hand not to encourage too much. Opening the East hand would have worked just fine, and in fact did when played on Friday morning, as all the E/W went plus, except the pair who passed it out!!
-
A No-Trump bid by a passed hand. opposite a passed partner, is “unusual” at any level!! This becomes the takeout bid for the unbid suits, and usually doesn't have a whole lot of defense.
-
If partner holds the Ace in front of the King and is worried about leading it for fear of it being ruffed, leading a small card from the other side, up to the King, allows the Ace-holder to win safely if the closed hand does end up with a card in the suit, or follow small if the closed hand ruffs.
-
Even if East passes in second chair, West should open in fourth. Seven losers and a casino count (# of Spades + # of points equals at least 15) all point to opening 1 Spade.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 3, January 23 (Morning)
First a comment on the bidding. What does it mean to open 2H in fourth seat? It cannot be a preempt because everyone has passed so there is no one to preempt. Said differently, if you really want to preempt to stop one of your opponents from getting to a good contract, then in fourth seat you can just pass. So, opening 2H in fourth seat must mean something else. Most good players consider a fourth seat opening of 2H (or 2S) to be a good 6 card suit and at least an opening hand. A hand where it won’t take too much from partner to make a game. What does partner need to bid the game or to raise to the 3 level as an invite to game? Tricks. Aces and supported kings are good. Queens and Jacks are not particularly good. A fit with shortness might be useful. So, in the hand in question, E opens 2H in fourth seat and W passes because W has only a trick and a half which is not enough to make game.
The opening lead is the K of clubs won by the A and a club returned to the J and Q by S. Now what? Ask yourself what is going on. Your partner has shown you three clubs by her signal (count since her attitude is obvious) so declarer has a quick discard. So, it now becomes imperative to cash whatever tricks are available before declarer can take advantage of the now good T of clubs in dummy. How should you decide which suit to try to cash tricks in? Spades or diamonds? What about trying both? Lead the A of diamonds and then, depending on partner’s signal, continue diamonds or switch to spades. On this hand, partner will signal for a diamond continuation and you will cash 3 diamonds in addition to the club trick already in to hold declarer to 3. This defense seems obvious but it really isn’t until you think about what is going on. Apparently, not many other S’s found the diamond switch because we got a 6 on a 7 top for holding declarer to 9 tricks. Only 3 EW pairs were held to 9 tricks; 4 made 10 or 11 tricks and one made 12 tricks!
Lessons:
1. A “weak” two in fourth seat is not weak at all. Rather, it shows a good 6 (or longer) suit and a strong opening bid.
2. To raise partner's fourth position opening two bid you need tricks, not points. I think you should estimate that opener has about 7 to 7.5 tricks in hand so you need about 3 tricks to raise to game and 2 to invite game.
3. When you are defending, a good question to ask yourself is what is declarer doing and why? If you can answer that question, the correct defense will often become obvious.
4. On this hand, it appears that declarer has just set up a quick discard and, therefore, it behooves the defense to cash as many quick tricks as it can.
5. If you can maneuver to be able to try both suits that may need cashing, it is better than guessing which suit to try. On this hand, S could cash the diamond ace and then, based on partner’s signal, she can decide whether to continue diamonds or switch to spades.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand #4, 1/16/2013 (Morning)
West opened 1H with a strong 19 point hand and North overcalled 2D. East raised hearts to 2 and West first thought to bid 4H. But, with a semi-balanced hand with good diamond stoppers, West decided to show the second range NT hand by bidding 2NT. North, with 5-5 in the minors, bid 3C and East, who could have been much weaker, was happy to bid 3NT. Both East & West were looking for the extra 10 important duplicate points a NT contract can often deliver.
North led the 10S and West paused to think. North had to be at least 5-5 in the minors for the bidding and the lead was either a singleton or doubleton. Without North's bids it would be normal to win the spade in dummy and finesse in hearts. But North did not use the unusual 2NT bid to show a weak hand with long minors. Typically, bidding both suits would show a hand with a good overcall or even opening bid strength willing to show both minors. But the entire North/South point count holding was only 12. So, West decided North was likely to hold the KH and won the spade lead with the K in hand and played the AH.
West was rewarded when the KH dropped. Now West could count 5 heart tricks, 5 spade tricks and the AD. Establishing a club trick would bring the total to 12, so West lead a club towards dummy at trick 3. North ducked and dummy's QC won. Next, 2 heart finesses of the JH established that suit and declarer could now cash all the hearts pitching a club and diamond from dummy (leaving 4 good spades and the 10D and 10C in dummy).
A spade to dummy and three more good spades followed. Dummy was left with the 2 minor suit tens and declarer held the AQ of diamonds. North had to either set up dummy's 10C or come down to a stiff KD. Declarer made 7NT!
Honesty Disclaimer: At the table, declarer did not execute the squeeze but still gained a top for being in NT and making 6NT.
Lessons
1. At the start of a hand, review the auction and the opening lead carefully for clues about how to play the hand.
2. North's choice of bidding both minors instead of using the unusual NT often means a hand with too many points to want to pre-empt, especially when partner has not passed yet.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 1, Friday 1/11/2013
This hand illustrates a useful matchpoint tactic where declarer takes a finesse that doesn't appear to be necessary in order to possibly gain an overtrick.
East has a distributional 4-loser hand and is happy to jump to game after West supports spades. South leads a trump and North wins and continues trumps. East pulls the final outstanding trump and finesses for the KD. South wins and leads the 8C.
Should East finesse for the KC despite having a singleton? Does the fact that West bid clubs influence this decision?
The answer is that a finesse cannot cost anything and might gain a trick - whether South had bid or not. If the finesse wins, declarer uses the AC to pitch a losing heart. The heart also goes even if the finesse loses as declarer can get back to the dummy with a diamond. So, declarer takes the finesse and is rewarded by making 5S.
What if the defense had switched to a heart at trick 2? Now declarer would be risking her contract by rising with the AH and finessing a club. In duplicate, with the club overcall, declarer should take that risk and still finesse since the overtrick can mean so much at matchpoints.
How about if South had not bid - should East risk the contract in order to have what appears to be a 50% chance of an overtrick? Never in a team game or rubber bridge and probably not in duplicate unless declarer feels it is necessary in order to lift an average game up into the winning category.
Lesson
Be on the lookout for plays in duplicate that cannot cost and may bring home an extra trick. Sometimes, making a play that can create an extra trick is correct even when it might cost you your (cold) contract. That is because of the high matchpoint value of an overtrick.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 3, Thursday Morning 1/3/2013
This hand from the Sectional is a good example of how a declarer tries to come up with a plan that might succeed even when things look hopeless.
South opened a weak 2S bid and North chose to bid 4S - if North had tried 3NT we would have no story to tell (but there are many hands where 3NT would have little chance and 4S would have good play, for example if South was missing the A of spades and had a singleton diamond and perhaps 3 hearts to the J and 3 clubs to the Q).
Now you are declarer in 4S and you have a loser in hearts, a loser in diamonds, and two possible club losers. The opening lead is the QH from, presumable the QJ without the 10 which is in dummy. How can you eliminate one of these 4 losers or, equivalently, create a 10th winner?
First you consider clubs: if West has both the K and the Q you can lead to dummies AJ6 and score two tricks. That would be a 25% chance of success. But, would West lead the QH from QJ and some number of smaller ones when he had a more appealing KC lead? Most likely not - very much eliminating the hope that the K and Q of clubs are in West's hand.
Are there any other ways to find a 10th trick?. Well, the lead might be helpful since you do have the A1093 in dummy. If the opening lead is from QJx, you can win the AH and later lead towards the 1093. If West wins the J, take a later ruffing finesse against East's K by leading the 10 from dummy. That will set up the 9H for a 10th trick.
Another distribution the will manufacture a heart trick is if West if leading from QJxxx. Simply duck a second round of hearts and later lead the 10 pitching a loser and setting up the 9 for a winner - this would be a loser on a loser play to set up a 10th trick.
So, which distribution to play for? Perhaps playing a round of trump first, carefully keeping
at least one trump entry in dummy, will help. After winning the AH, you lead the 5S to your hand.
East plays the 10S, most likely a singleton. If that's the case, you consider it more likely he has heart length than Kx. So, you lead towards the 1093 of hearts at trick 3 and play the 10, losing to the K. East now leads the KD and you note West's play of the JD and win the ace. You next lead a low heart from dummy and discover you should have played East for Kx.
So, you could have manufactured a heart trick but you played the suit wrong. Are you back to playing for the KQ of clubs on-sides, even though you are nearly certain this is not the case? Are there any other chances left?
What do you know? East had 1 spade and 2 hearts and probably 7 diamonds to the KQ98xxx
(West would almost never drop the JD looking at dummies A107 unless he had a singleton).
So East's distribution is 1-2-7-3. What if East has both the K and Q of clubs. Can you put pressure on East by playing all your trumps out? Try it and see what happens.
You note East pitching diamond after diamond as you play out all your spades. You reach a 4 card ending keeping the AJ of clubs in dummy and the 107 of diamonds. What can East keep if he has the KQ of clubs? Either the Q9 of diamonds and the KQ of clubs or the QD and the KQx of clubs. So you watch and count the diamonds East pitches carefully. If he keeps just the KQ of clubs and 2 diamonds you play the A and J of clubs and East gives you your 10th trick with dummy's 10D at trick 13. If he keeps KQx of clubs and the QD, you lead your 4D to his Q, again making dummy's 10D a winner.
Miracle of miracles, it works! It would even work if East has just the KC and doesn't unblock it under your ace at the end position.
Lessons:
1. Even when things seem almost hopeless you should try to picture opponent distributions that give you a chance to manufacture another trick. If there are several possibilities, play for the one that seems most likely.
2. As you play out a hand and get new information about the opponent's distributions reconsider your plan and revise your judgement about which possibilities still open are most likely.
3. The way to visualize endplay or squeeze endings is to picture what cards you hope will be left in your opponent's hands after you run off your long suit winners. In this case you know it will be a 4 card ending and you watch discards and combine that with what you hope is the location of the outstanding key cards and play accordingly.
3. When in doubt how to get an extra trick, start playing off all your long trumps or your running suits and watch what the opponent's pitch. Often good things will happen!
Honesty Disclaimer: I was declarer and played the hand exactly as described up to the 4 card ending. However, I missed a diamond discard from East and thought he had come down to two cards in each of the minor suits instead of the singleton QD. So, I went down 1 and missed a top board!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand #18, December 27 (Thursday)
Declaring the hands is fun and the top you get when you play it better than anyone else is very satisfying! Defending better than anyone else doesn't seem to get as much attention, but the top is just as satisfying. Figuring out the hand is sometimes tough and especially with only 1 played trick.
Look at today's defensive problem for West: The auction was Pass by partner, 1 Club by South, 1 Diamond by West, 1 Heart, Pass, 3 Hearts, Pass , 4 Hearts and then 3 Passes.
THE PLAY
Partner led the 6 of Diamonds and West takes his King of Diamonds. Now is the time to carefully look over the situation. The Clubs are so threatening and if partner has the King of Clubs it might not be deep enough to stop declarer from running the suit with a couple finesses. If declarer has the King of Clubs, all defensive tricks will go away. West hates to lay down the Ace of Spades (especially considering his tenace over dummy), but it must be right this time with the Club dilemma. So he plays the Ace of Spades and then is so pleasantly surprised when declarer shows out of spades on the 2nd round!! Bravo!
Look easy? Only 1 player found this play! The others are all making 6 , so there is a nice reward for figuring out the hand.
Lesson
The time to be passive in your defensive play is NOT when there is a long running suit on dummy. Cash out!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 2, Thursday Dec. 20
Bidding:1H - 3S - 4H - 4S
5H - p - p - 5S
p - p - X - p
p - p
Study the club suit in today's deal. How should South play to keep from losing two club tricks?
This was a very interesting hand. North-South can make five spades, and East-West can make 6 hearts-- unless South finds the club lead, and North knows to return a diamond. The bidding, shown above, is a guess. (At our table, fearful of the vulnerabilty, South only over-called 2S, and after West cue bid 3S, North also was afraid to compete.) Several declarers did play 5S doubled however, yet all failed. Where did they go wrong?
My guess is that the declarers led low to the ace of clubs, and then led towards the queen, hoping that East, the opening bidder, held the king. That line of play has a better than a 50% chance of making. It succeeds whenever East has the king, or a singleton or doubleton jack. But it is not the best line.
How should you play the club suit?
The best line is to lead the queen of clubs. If West has the king, you always make three club tricks, whether he covers or not, and if the queen loses to East's king, you later finesse West for the jack. This lines wins whenever West has either the K or J of clubs, about a 75% chance.
One could argue that East opened the bidding, so is more likely to hold the king of clubs, but West showed values too. Plus, East is showing long hearts, leaving less room in his hand for both club honors.
So how did it go at our table? Sitting east, I voluntarily bid six hearts. South found the club lead, but after winning the ace, North tried cashing the ace of spades. Now I just had to draw trump, and play the diamond suit for no losers. Since South showed long spades, I should have played her for diamond shortness. I should have played to the king of diamonds, then taken the marked finesse in diamonds twice. That's what I should have done.Instead, I cashed the ace of diamonds, and then had no chance.
Lesson Point. With A109x opposite Qxxx, absent other relevant information, the percentage play is to lead the Q and let it ride if not covered. If it loses,you later try to finesse the jack.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 18, Friday 12/14/2012
Only one pair reached the excellent diamond slam on the hand shown, showing how even experienced duplicate players have difficulty exploring for a minor suit slam when they have to go past the ever enticing contract of 3NT.
The auction shown is one recommended path that reaches slam. However, before explaining the partnership agreements underlying this auction, let's look at why West should be thinking about a 6D slam the minute she hears partner open 1D. It goes back to that very useful tool often mentioned in the "Hand of the Week" - Loser Count. West has a loser count of 4 (one in each suit) and an almost certain fit in diamonds. If partner has the expected opener loser count of 7 or better, then loser count predicts a slam will make unless the defenders have two outstanding cashing aces. So, West can almost jump to Blackwood immediately. But there is no reason to not to first explore to see if the hand can play in a major suit contract or NT.
After West bids 1H, East follows with 2C (showing an unbalanced hand that did not want to bid 1NT - probably at least 5 diamonds and at least 4 clubs). West now bids the 4th suit with a 2S bid. This is the first of several very common partnership agreements: 2S can be totally artificial with nothing in spades and game forcing values - partner is asked to show if he has a spade stopper and also show his hand strength, if possible. After alerting the bid, partner will bid 2NT with extra values and a spade control - the second partnership agreement in this auction. Of course, West knows the control must be the ace. East would jump to 3NT instead of 2NT with just a normal opener and a spade control (bid less to show more and bid more to show less).
When East bids 2NT, West knows East has a good hand and the spade ace. West bids 3D, confirming a diamond fit and suggesting slam interest - otherwise, West would just sign off in 3NT.
East, with three aces, cooperates in slam exploration by cue-bidding 3S and West, feeling safe at the 5-level even if off two aces, bids 4NT (key-card Blackwood). 6D is reached after the response shows 0 or 3 key cards in a diamond contract.
Play In 6D
After a trump lead (best for defense), declarer should plan to ruff 2 clubs in dummy and also lead or play to the KH, all before playing another trump. That insures 12 tricks (3 spades, 1 heart, 1 club and 2 ruffs, and 5 trump in hand). A finesse or a backwards finesse in clubs is not needed to make the slam.
Lessons:
1. When loser count suggests a slam, be willing to go past 3NT to explore. If partner had only had 2 aces when responding to Keycard Blackwood, you could bid 5S to ask partner to sign off in 5NT. Or, if you also play another convention known as Minorwood, a bid of 4D in the auction shown (after the 3S bid) would be Keycard Blackwood in Diamonds. If East has only two aces, he will respond 4NT and that could be passed. Minorwood, for those playing it, applies on game forcing auctions after a minor suit has been confirmed and 4 of the minor is bid.
2. This hand can make 6NT because the heart A and J are both on sides and spades are 3-3. However, a 6D slam is a much better proposition and should be the choice at the table. When it is hard to bid a slam, choose the one with the best chance of success (which is often not 6NT).
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 25, Tues. Dec 4, 2012
Only two pairs in the open, and only one pair in the limited game managed to reach slam on this hand. How should the bidding go after West opens one spade in 4th seat?
At our table East raised to 2 spades. West should now realize that despite the minimal raise, slam is a possibility. If East has the king of spades, and one ace, it has a good chance of making. Still, it is too soon to Blackwood, because East may hold none of those cards.
West bid 3c, ostensibly a help suit game try, but in reality, West was just trying to find out if East liked his hand. West bid 3d, possibly denying help in clubs, but certainly showing help in diamonds.
That was all West needed to hear to ask for key cards and then bid the slam.
With two aces and the queen doubleton of clubs, I think East could have simply bid 4s, and no doubt he would have bid game had West tried to sign off in three spades.
Or, making life even easier for West, East could have bid Drury for his first bid, showing a limit raise. Others may disagree, but I think the East hand is good enough for a limit raise, especially if you play 2C as your Drury bid. Then if opener bids 2D, showing a full opener, East can bid 2S, showing a minimum.
The east-west pair was playing a more complicated system, and East would have had to bid 2d to show a three-card limit raise, and while that would have worked here, it could have made rebids more troublesome if West just held a normal 13 or 14 count.
Of course, it didn't have to work out so well. Despite holding two key cards, it is not that hard to envision hands where slam still wouldn't make. (And then this wouldn't have been chosen as the hand of the week!)
Lesson Point: During the bidding try to envision what different hands partner might hold. And while you should never simply hope your partner holds certain specific cards, try to find a way to safely explore. In this case, the 3C bid and response made it safe to bid 4NT, and when East showed two key cards, slam became a decent probability.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wednesday Evening, 11/29/2012, Hand # 20
Four out of 7 pairs ended up playing 5C by North on this wildly distributional hand and only one pair made the contract. The auction shown was one of the ways this contract was reached. West did not open a weak two bid in diamonds because of holding 4 spades and North, holding a 3 loser hand, opened a strong 2C bid despite only having 12 high card points.
A comment on the bidding: It is possible for East/West to make a slam in either Spades or Diamonds but only 1 pair played in diamonds and 1 in spades, both at the 5 level. That shows the power of North's 8 card club suit - opponents generally prefer to double or pass at the 5-level rather than bid on when they haven't had a chance to clearly show their strengths and distributions.
But the real lesson in this hand comes in the play at 5C. Why did only one North make the contract and 3 go down when the hand analyzer says it should make?
The key is in the play of the Heart suit. North knows that she will lose one diamond and from 1 to 3 heart tricks. In order to make, she must hold her heart losers to only one trick. Is this possible and, if there are several ways to do it, what is the best (i.e., most likely) way to try?
First let's look at how we would normally play hearts if we had plenty of entries to either hand and 3 little opposite KQ108. We would lead to the K and, if it loses, next lead to the 10. A recent "Hand of the Week" showed how it was best for the defense holding the A of hearts behind the KQ10 to duck smoothly so that declarer has the option of going wrong by putting up the Q on the next lead towards the Q10. In other words, declarer after winning the K has to guess whether the defender behind her was holding up the A when leading a second heart towards the Q10. Of course, when the KQ10 are in the closed hand, it is much harder for a defender to know whether to duck or not and declarer should probably put up the Q on the second lead when the K holds on the first lead. That's how we play hearts when we can lead twice towards the KQ108.
But this situation is different because we have only one entry to dummy! We have to make the best play to get 3 out of four heart tricks with only one chance to lead to the KQ108. Try placing heart cards and you will see that there is only one possible lay of the cards where you will succeed by playing the heart K after West plays a low heart. That occurs when East has precisely the J9 of hearts and you follow up by leading the Q the next time you play hearts. On the other hand, any time West has 3 hearts including the J (and this can occur 10 different ways), you will succeed by leading low to the 10 and playing the K next. You will also make 3 tricks if West has the AJ doubleton by winning the first trick and leading low to West's A. In addition, if West has the J9 doubleton, you cover the 9 with the 10 and later smother the J when you lead the K - winning 3 out of four hearts.
So there are 12 possible holdings in the West hand where you can succeed by leading to your 10 and only playing the K when West plays the J. And only one holding works when you start by lead to the K (assuming West doesn't play the J).
Conclusion: Declarer should lead a club to dummy's K and then a heart to the 10. Since the J 52 lie in the West hand, declarer will pick up all but 1 heart trick and make 5C.
Lesson:
1. The way you play a suit depends on the number of tricks you need to win in that suit and the entries you have to lead from either hand.
2. In this hand you need 3 out of four heart tricks and can only lead once towards the KQ108. So, you have to stop and think about the possible distributions of the defenders cards that will allow you to succeed and pick a line of play that maximizes your chances. Here, it is clearly best to lead to the 10.
Advanced Lesson (Some Gee-Whiz Defensive Plays Only Super Experts Might Make!)
Think about this hand and the heart suit from a defender's point of view. If you know or guess that you need at least 2 heart tricks to set 5C, then you might worry that declarer has the KQ10x of hearts. You also know declarer probably cannot get back to dummy to lead hearts a second time and will play the 10 if you play a low heart.. So, with Jxx, you should make the super expert play of rising J on the lead from dummy. Declarer will win (assuming an expert East ducks the A) and picture your holding to be the AJ. Declarer will therefore go wrong by next leading the 8 and losing to your partner's 9! Note that it is hard or impossible to picture a holding where rising J can cost you a trick, no matter what declarer's holding is, assuming declarer plays correctly.
This same play also holds if you are West and hold the J9 of hearts. Play the J on the first lead and, if partner ducks the A, declarer will go wrong by playing you for the AJ doubleton and lead the 8 around to your 9.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11/20, Hand # 13
The subject of this hand is the style and substance of opening in the third position after 2 passes. Partnerships should agree on the minimum requirements and when to open a weak 2 bid in third seat.. What message does it send to your partner when you open in 3rd seat, 2 Hearts Vulnerable? What message with a 1 Heart opening in 3rd seat? What are the dangers of each?
If you are my partner, you are aware I may open very light in 3rd seat (to protect partner from having to open light in 1st seat, as well as for lead directional). You should expect at least 9 points and that is what this hand has, along with 8 losers. So this hand would not surprise my partner if I opened 1 heart.What would surprise my partner is if I opened 2 Hearts! Seems strange that supposedly a weaker bid shows a better hand in 3rd seat. Maybe the key is the vulnerability and what action might happen from the opponents. To open 2 Hearts with only a 5 card suit will mislead partner and is dangerous when vulnerable! Partners don't like surprises like that!
If you open 1 Heart, your LHO will bid 1 No Trump and you should be safe! Remember, partner knows you can open weak in 3rd seat and, hopefully, will pass with his very minimal hand.
However, after opening 2 Hearts the auction was pass, pass DOUBLE, all pass, Well, no surprise that you are now in 2 Hearts doubled and down 2, minus 500 when the opponents can only make 2 No Trump.
Lesson 1: Use caution when opening in 3rd seat and make the safest bid you can when vulnerable. Many times pass is the winning call.
Lesson 2: Using a weak 2 in 3rd seat can be dangerous with adverse vulnerability.
Lesson 3: Make sure you and your partner are playing 3rd seat openings the same way and understand how weak they might be.
.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 7 from Monday Morning, 11/12/12
The bidding was P – P – 1N – P – 2C – 2S – 2N – 3N. The opening lead was the 2 of diamonds.
First, a comment on the bidding. NS were playing 15-18 range so North’s opening bid of 1NT was within their agreed range. What should South do? The partnership has a possible game if North has a heart fit or if South’s club suit can be used as a source of tricks in NT. But South has only 7 HCP. A very close decision and this South decided that her hand was worth a game try to find out if they had a heart fit so she bid 2C. When North answered 2S, South had no choice but to bid 2NT since 3C would be forcing and a clear overbid. With a maximum, North had an easy raise to 3NT.
The problem of the diamond suit wasn’t revealed until the opening lead had been made. Looking at the NS hands, we can see that 5C is a much better contract and 6C is not the worst slam I have ever been in but most partnerships do not have the tools necessary to explore and reject NT because of the diamond weakness. North must hope that somehow the EW pair blocks the diamond suit to be able to cash only 4 diamond tricks.
East leads the 2 of diamonds and West wins the J of diamonds. West returns the 4 of diamonds, North plays the 8 of diamonds and now the spotlight shifts back to East. To defeat this contract, East must be careful to win the King of diamonds, cash the Ace of diamonds and return the 9 to West so that West can over take and cash the setting trick. If East does not resist the temptation to win the second diamond trick with the 9, the contract will be made because now only 4 diamond tricks can be cashed.
Without seeing West’s hand, how does East know that she should win the King of diamonds and not the 9 of diamonds. After all, why waste the King when the 9 will do as well?
The clue is in what happened at trick one. When West won the Jack of diamonds, East should reason that West also has the Queen of diamonds because if declarer had the Queen of diamonds, she surely would have won the Jack with the Queen. If West is observant and thinks the situation through, she will know what to do: win the King of diamonds, cash the Ace of diamonds, and lead the 9 of diamonds to partner to hopefully set the contract. I am proud to say that my partner did just that.
Lessons
1. Bidding is not an exact science and no matter what system a pair is playing, some hands will come up that do not fit into the system.
2. Although 15-17 is the normal NT range, there are other options. A pair can play any NT range as long as the range is not more than 4 points wide. This fact is why the ACBL requires that the NT range be announced when a player opens 1NT.
3. The defenders need to be cognizant of every spot that is played and need to be able to draw inferences about one hand or the other based on the cards played. The reason we play lower of touching honors when following suit is so that partner can draw these useful inferences. If we play touching honors in a random fashion, partner will never be able to know what is going on in this suit.
4. West on this hand was able to use the fact that one plays the lower of touching honors when following suit to conclude that East held the Queen as well as the Jack in the led suit. If East had played the Queen, West would conclude that declarer had the Jack and would not be able to make the nice play of winning the trick with a higher than necessary card so that the defenders could cash all of their deserved tricks.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Rosemary Kelley |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday Morning, November 9th Board 21
Opening Lead: Heart King (or Diamond King)
BIDDING COMMENTARY:
N/S: The Two Diamond call by South was going to be followed by a 3 Diamond call to remove the game force. When the auction got past that, and North raised the Diamonds, South competed to the four level. North tries for the Heart game once more,indicating a six card suit. South would pass or convert back to the Diamond game if he couldn't support the Hearts at all. Thus the 5 Heart bid by South. North has no reason to think his side can make 5 much less 6 so doubles the 5 Spade bid, for the sure plus.
E/W: West's 2 No Trump call is the “Unusual No-Trump.” Whenever an initial NT call makes no sense as a natural bid as in this case, it should be deemed as “Unusual.” The meaning here would be that West has the two unbid suits, at least 5-card length in each, and has either a weak (<10pt.) hand or a strong (>14 pt.) one. With points between 10 and 14 West would bid Spades, and then Clubs if partner does not raise the Spades.
East is delighted with the bid and knows that if West is “weak” then N/S have a game but wants an opportunity to show the fit in both suits. He bids just 4Clubs the first time. There is a case to be made for him to bid 4 Spades or 5 Clubs immediately, but if he does, West will never be able to show a more distributional hand if he has it. When North corrects the 4 Diamonds to 4 Hearts, East now shows the Spade fit by bidding 4 Spades, with the suggestion that a sacrifice should be taken. With no defense in the red suits, South takes the 5-level sacrifice.
PLAY COMMENTARY:
North/South should get both Hearts and a Diamond, as well as the Spade King. If North switches to the singleton Club before all the red winners are cashed, East cannot afford to take the Spade finesse and lose it and then get a Club ruff. In this case, a Spade to the Ace and then the Queen will take out four of the five trumps and hopefully hold the defense to their 4 tricks. A good sacrifice, taken with the help of the“Unusual No-Trump” bid.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 26, October 31st Evening
East arrives at 3NT after partner's optimistic bidding and the lead is the 7 of diamonds. South'played low and East won the 10. Now East decided to work on clubs to develop tricks in dummy's longest suit.
What is the best way to tackle clubs? With no opponent bidding it makes sense to finesse the Q and hope it wins and the suit splits 2-3 or 3-2. But North did overcall and therefore has most of the missing high cards. So East played to the A of clubs and led a low club off dummy! North won the king and dummy had three more winning clubs set up.
North now led another low diamond and East's play to this trick is crucial. Suppose East tries the 10  . South will win the K and continue the suit and North will eventually win 3 diamond tricks, a club and the A  . If East plays low on the diamond, South wins the 8, continues the K and switches to a heart if Easty ducks the K  . The result is again down 1.
But what happens if East reasons from the auction, lead and play so far that South has led from 3 to the K  . Then going up with the A  blocks the suit and East can drive out the A  and end up making 4NT.
Note that even if North has both the K and Q of diamonds, declarer will still make 3NT after playing the A of diamonds on the second lead. So this is a failsafe play.
The play to make 3NT would be much more difficult if North rises with the Q  at trick 1. If declarer wins the A  and plays clubs as before he will go down no matter what diamond he plays at trick 4 (after North wins the K  and leads a low diamond). The winning play is for North to duck the Q  , win the A  at trick 2 and then drive out the A  . Declarer will end up getting 3 diamonds (ducking the third lead to South's K  ), 3 spades and either 2 hearts and a club or two clubs and a heart.
Lessons
1. On many hands where you know finesses are very likely to lose, it may be better to play for a K doubleton off sides rather than waste the Q in a losing finesse.
2. Consider whether you can block the opponents suit by playing a high honor insteading of taking a losing finesse or ducking, An example is the play of the A  at trick 4, which would enable declarer to make 4NT instead of going down 1 in 3NT.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 9, Sunday Afternoon, Oct. 21
If you have the ace of trump, you'll probably be able to win a trick with it. When you're on defense, don't be in too big a hurry to grab that trick. A declarer is often glad to get the ace of trump out of the way early, allowing him to go about his business without further interruption. This hand is just one example where a defender was in too big of a hurry to play the ace of trump.
A diamond opening lead gave North a free finesse he didn't really need since he could later discard dummy's third diamond anyway. Looking at all four hands, we can see that declarer has a club loser and a heart loser, so he had to avoid two losers in the trump suit.
He had a choice how to play the trump suit. He could hope the jack was on-onside and lead up to the 10, or he could hope the ace was on-side and lead up twice towards dummy's KQ. Generally, in this situation, with sufficient entries back to hand, it is often correct to delay the decision by first leading up to the king. You can always take the finesse later. That is what declarer did.
West, looking at the KQ109 in dummy, should have anticipated this and ducked smoothly. The declarer would then have had to guess between leading up to the queen or leading up to the ten.
At our table, West took the king with the ace. Now, when declarer got back in he had little choice but to take the percentage play and finesse the jack, making the contract. Had west ducked smoothly, declarer would likely have gone down.
Worse,after West took the ace, he then took some time thinking about what card to lead. If he didn't have a plan, why win the trick?
One can imagine West's thought process. My ace is doubleton anyway. Might as well take the king with it. If I don't take it, and declarer leads a low trump off dummy, my ace won't even bag an honor card.
As if declarer would lead low off of dummy! Declarer can't see your hand. From the bidding, West should know declarer had four spades, meaning partner had three.If declarer had the jack of spades, it didn't matter what West did, but if his partner happened to have the jack it was imperative to play low.
Some notes on the bidding:
After North opens one heart, South has to decide between 1S and 2H. South is too weak to show his spades. With a bare six points, he just wants to show support for partner's suit and then shut up. He limits his strength and shows support all in one bid. If he bids 1S and the oppoents bid up to three of a minor, for example, he would never be able to tell his partner about his heart support without suggesting a stronger hand.
After South bids 2H, North is strong enough to make a game-try by bidding 2S. It doesn't necessarily promise four spades, and it is definitely not a reverse. It shows at least a little extra, and is presumably looking for help in spades.
Over 2S, South has a close call, with only six high card points and flat distribution.Still, with such good spades, I would accept game by bidding 3S. This is game-forcing, not invitational. Why? Because North may only have 3 spades. 3S by South promises 4+ spades, and shows a willingness to play game in either major.
In this particular hand, North elects to play in 4 spades, despite his four measly spades. He anticipates having to ruff clubs, and would rather do so with his small spades, while using dummy's supposedly good spades to pull trump. In general, a 4-4 trump fit is preferable to a 5-3 fit. Indeed on this hand, the declarers who played in hearts took only nine tricks, while the declarers who played in spades took ten.
Key Lesson Points
Don't be in a hurry to win the ace of trump on defense unless you have a good reason. Anticipate the play, and have a plan ready. Be sure to duck smoothly when you are not taking the ace.
A 4-4 trump fit is generally superior to a 5-3 fit.
|
 |
|
|
| Complimenta of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wednesday, 10/17/2012 Hand # 17
An interesting hand in that 5/6 pairs in the novice game got to slam and only 3 out of six pairs on the open session got to 6H. A kudo for the teachers helping the novices move up - but not so good for the more experienced players!
Shown in the bidding box is a sequence that would lead to 6H. After North open 1H, West has a loser count of 7 in support of hearts and a super fit (7 support cards to the K!!). So west is good enough to force to game and suggest slam possibilities if North has the needed controls. The 3S bid is a splinter bid showing 0 or 1 spade and game values.
After seeing the 3S bid, despite the interference by West, North first tries for a grand by cue bidding diamonds and then, when South does not cue bid in spades, bids the 6 heart slam.
So why did so many pairs miss this slam? At my table, South thought only 7 high card points was too little to do anything other than raise hearts to game. After West bid 5D, the North/South pair stopped in 5H.
Probably many point counters undervalued the South hand and led their partnership to stop short of slam. This is a 7 loser hand (1 in spades, 2 in hearts, 2 in diamonds and 2 in clubs) with a heart fit that insures at most 1 heart loser if there is a singleton AH outstanding. It is well worth showing the splinter by jumping 2 levels in spades and that is all it takes to convince North to bid to at least a small slam.
There is little to the play. If the defense leads a diamond, after ruffing and pulling 1 round of trump, the spade in dummy goes away on the 3rd or 4th club lead by declarer. Making 7 if spades are not led, 6 otherwise,
Lessons
Marty Bergen wrote a bridge book called "Points Schmoints" in which he showed that straight point count ways of hand evaluation can often undervalue a hand. This is a perfect example where 7 high card points are worth their weight in gold because of the 7 card trump support and the AD and singleton spade. Loser count works best here and shows that this South hand is worth a confident game raise that can show its singleton on the way to game.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2012 - Hand # 30
East should have doubled 4D, but then we wouldn’t have had a story to tell. The opening lead was the Ace of diamonds followed by the King of diamonds. Now South made a slight error by switching to a heart. Declarer won the King played by North with the Ace. Declarer then decided that North had the Jack of hearts also since it was unlikely that South would switch to a heart holding the Jack. Declarer crossed to the King of spades and played a heart to the 9. The good news was that 9 won. The bad news was that South showed out. It looks like North has a sure heart trick but if North has (at least) 3 spades and (at least) 2 clubs, the hand is cold. Watch what happens. Since North started with four hearts, the line of play is now to shorten declarer's trumps to the same length as North.
Here's how you proceed: Cash the Ace of spades (so you can ruff spades in your hand). Cross to the Ace of clubs, ruff a spade, cross to the King of clubs, ruff another spade. In the end position, North has the J8 of hearts and the Jack of diamonds. Declarer has the QT of hearts and the Ten of clubs left. Now lead the Ten of clubs and whoever wins the trick has to give declarer the QT of hearts to make 10 tricks (6 hearts, 2 spades, and 2 clubs). If South wins the club, North pitches her diamond. Now South has to lead a diamond and declarer can overruff whatever North plays. If North wins the club, North is endplayed and has to lead a heart into the QT of hearts. You make the contract even when the club finesse is off!
Lessons:
1. When you get a bad trump break, stop, take a deep breath, and modify your plan. Sometimes, extra trumps in the defensive hand is not necessarily a bad thing.
2. This kind of hand comes up frequently. Once you know about the bad break, try to imagine a distribution that makes the hand. On this hand, you will make if North has enough black cards so that you can get to dummy twice to shorten yourself.
3. When you are short in trumps on defense, it is usually not a good idea to lead trumps. Leading trumps might hurt partner’s holding and, as on this hand, it helps declarer by essentially giving him an extra entry to dummy.
4. The bidding lesson is that East should double 4D. She doesn’t really know that 4H will make but she is pretty sure that 4D will not make because she has the AK of clubs and the K of spades and partner has opened the bidding. Another indicator toward doubling rather than bidding on is that she has only two hearts which means that partner may be able to take some heart tricks.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Rosemary Kelley |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monday Evening, 10/1/2012, Hand # 20
Bidding and making a Grand Slam is always an exciting Bridge event - even when the contract was overly ambitious! Here's an example with interesting bidding and play pointers.
BIDDING COMMENTARY:
Two Diamonds was a game force, unless3 Diamonds was rebid. West's 2 Spade bid is suggested in a 2/1 game forcing auction, when no other bid is more descriptive. Since West has no other 4 card suit and No-Trump would suggest at least a doubleton Diamond, 2 Spades is the answer. Playing 2/1, Responders need to be aware that a rebid of a major in this auction (and similar ones) does not always promise a six card suit.
East's 3 Spade bid should therefore be at least 3-card support (rarely honor-doubleton) and slam invitational. When West explores with Key Card Blackwood, the missing Ace is now accounted for. Five Hearts is an inquiry into the Spade Queen. With it, East will bid their first King available, in this case Diamonds. Please note the implied agreement that all five Key Cards are now accounted for (or West will not ask about the Queen), East is now convinced that a Grand Slam is possible and could bid it directly over 5 Hearts. In this case, however, East temporized with a 6 Diamond response to see if West was going to bid Spades or No Trump.When the sign-off came in Spades, East correctly chose the spade suit contract at the seven level, seeing the possible need (indeed!) for a Diamond ruff to set up the suit. A side note here is that when you bid a grand slam, you should be able to count 13 tricks. When in Notrump, the 13 tricks need to be TOP tricks, with no trumping necessary. Besides, it is rare that any Grand bid and made at the Club level is not above average, so safety first (trump contract) is a good rule here.
PLAY COMMENTARY (After a K Lead):
West sees a couple of possibilitiesfor the contract. If the Diamonds break 3/3, there is no problem.But probability tables say that the 4/2 is much more common than the 3/3. so one ruff in Diamonds will likely be necessary. Now, the 13th trick is available through a Club finesse.
Win the Ace of Hearts. Play the Ace and King of Spades and breathe your first sigh of relief; Trumps broke as needed, 3/2. Lead a Diamond to the Ace and ruff a Diamond.(Another sigh here, as Diamonds are no worse than 4/2). Now a Spade to the Queen pulls the last trump and puts you in dummy for the run of the Diamonds. At the end, West will finesse the Club King and find success.
Three Bidding Pointers from this hand:
1. Make sure you have a very good chance of 13 tricks before bidding a Grand. East gambles on West having 6 Spades in her count to 13. (Nope!) Could have been. But East also knew that if there were not 6 Spades, then there might have been 2 Diamonds in the West hand, making the ruff unnecessary and 13 tricks that way (again Nope!). If there were a singleton Diamond, then West couldn't have gotten so excited about a slam invitation without a some extras in the Clubs or Hearts and a 13th trick might be forthcoming in one of these suits. (Yes!)
2. When bidding a slam, avoid the temptation to play in NT for the extra points when playing in a suit might be much safer - some pairs bid to 6 NT on this hand, which has no play after a K lead and a 4-2 diamond split.
3. Don't bid 29% Grand Slams, even if they work! Too tough on Partner, who has to play it!
Percentages: Spades breaking 3/2 68%
(All Diamonds (no worse than 4/2) 84%
Rounded) King ofClubs onside 50%
Multiplied together, as ALL have to be true, yields about a 29% Grand.
Small Slams should be 50+% to bid. Grand Slams should be at least 80% to bid!!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wednesday Morning, 9/26/2012, Hand # 7
Many players would overcall the 1  opening with a 2  bid holding the North hand - it does have 11 points and a 5 card suit. However, with no card higher than a Q and also being vulnerable, this North choose to pass. East almost raised the 2  bid to 3  but with only 7 high card points choose instead to pass.
Here's how the play went: North led the Q  and West won with the K, cashed the A  and ruffed a diamond. Next came 2 high trumps, with West finding that North had a trump trick. West now played a club to the J and South won the A and returned a club to dummy's K. Declarer ruffed a club back to hand and played a spade to the K. South's A  won and North's J  won the next trick. This left this 3 card ending (with West on the bottom as declarer):
-
97
-
4
- 83
Q -
J8 -
- 9
106
10
-
-
North cashed the Q  and exited with the J  . Declarer had to ruff with dummy's last trump and South's 9 of clubs won the last trick.
West did make 2  but the hand record said it should make 3  . What did this West (and almost half of the other West's who played in hearts) do wrong to make only 2?
The first misplay was playing the second high diamond and ruffing a diamond in dummy. It is generally wrong or wasteful to ruff in the hand with the longer trump suit and the other high diamond might be needed as a hand entry later in the play. West should start with 2 high trumps - if they split, 3  has to make and 4  will make if either the A  is onsides or declarer guesses how to play clubs correctly. If both those things happen, the contract will make 5  !
But, hearts do not split. Declarer next should play spades - if the A is onsides and the suit splits, 3  or even 4  might make. When South wins and plays a diamond, Declarer wins and leads a club to the J, losing to a to South's A  . South plays another diamond, forcing dummy to ruff. Declarer then cashes the K  and exits dummy with a spade to the 10 and West's J. Here's what the 4 card ending looks like, with North on lead and West (on the bottom) having already taken 6 tricks:
-
97
-
42
- 83
Q -
J8 -
Q 9
106
108
-
-
There is nothing North can do to stop Declarer from winning 3 more tricks because Declarer has managed to set up a spade winner and still has a trump entry to get to his hand.
Lesson: Preserve your entries carefully when you need to lead from one hand several times and may have to get back to that hand to cash any winners you set up. Also, avoid gratuitous ruffs in the hand with the longer trump suit. Trumping in the long suit is generally correct only in one of the 3 following scenarios:
1) You are forced to by the defense.
2) You need to trump a suit in order to set up winners in that suit.
3) You can trump enough times to make the long trump suit become the shorter trump suit (and still maintain trump control).
|
 |
|
|
| Complements of Pam LaShelle |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday evening Pairs of the AustinSectional, Sept 21, Board 28
The auction, reprinted below, is the main point of this hand.
S W N E
P P P
1NT P 2C P
2S P P P
Seems like every hand has many bidding choices and the trick is to find the best one. North really nailed this one!
The auction was simple, 3 passes to South and a 14-17 point NT opening. North used Stayman and after a 2 Spade bid by opener, North passed. When you look at his hand, it is the perfect bid. He can support any response by South and is prepared to pass at his next turn. This is called Trash Stayman (some call it Garbage Stayman) and is a part of Stayman used by many players. In order to use Trash Stayman you must be able to stand any bid partner makes and have less than a game invitation (often much less!). Is it a problem that North only has 3 Spades? Not at all, 4-3 fits are fine, especially with the ruffing value in Clubs this hand has.
Next to the play: With the 5 of Diamonds out, RHO took the Ace of Diamonds and returned a Diamond to the King. Declarer took the Ace of Clubs, ruffed a Club, played the King of Spades and a small one to the Ace and exited with a small trump. Not knowing which suit was better to lead the opponents returned a Club! Making 4 was worth all the match points.
The lesson in the auction is to find the bid that will yield the greatest results the most times. North's choice's were to pass 1NT, bid 2 Diamonds to play (not available to players using transfer bids but one player was in 2 Diamonds) or use Trash Stayman and get to 2 Spades. Out of 9 Pairs, 5 were in 2 Spades.
The lesson in the play is to not mess around long after gaining control of the play. The more side suits you play, the greater chance that the opponents will be able to ruff or figure out what to do to set you. Notice after playing 3 rounds of trump, there was a chance of the opponents getting in, but if the trumps don't split, things will no doubt go awry at some point. Give yourself the best chance to succeed by making your plan and executing it. Don't "pussyfoot" around with the side suits.
Note: There is a useful extension to Garbage Stayman that is often added to the convention. If you have both majors, are very weak and short in diamonds, after bidding 2C and hearing 2D from partner, you bid 2H. Partner must pass or correct to 2S with longer spades than hearts. This works perfectly if you are 5 - 5 in the majors and will almost always get you to at least a 4 - 3 major suit fit. The partnership must agree, however, that a 2H bid after a 2D response to Stayman must be always passed or corrected to 2S.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand #21, Monday Evening, 9/3/2012
This hand, from almost 2 weeks ago, illustrates an important lesson for most beginners and even many intermediate players.
First the auction: After North opens 1NT some East's, with opening values and a good spade suit, might choose to bid 2S. This East, probably along with many others, choose to pass and heard South transfer North to hearts and then make a slam interest bid of 3D. North confirmed at least 3 card heart support and South cue bid the A of clubs. After North showed the A of diamonds, South bid the heart slam. After two passes, East looked at his trump holding, the KQ of spades and 2 outside queens and doubled.
Now North looked at the K of spades lead and had to play the doubled slam.
Let's first look at how North would normally play 6H without any outside information (i.e., without a double by East). Missing 4 trumps to the KJ10 and 7, there is no way to avoid at least one loser and you could lose 2 or even three trump tricks. You can pitch one of dummy's clubs on the A of spades and ruff the third round of clubs in dummy - so, if clubs split 3-2, as is most likely, you will have two extra club winners to pitch diamonds in dummy. Even if clubs don't work, you can hope the Q of diamonds Q finesse works. So, outside of the trump suit, chances for making all the tricks are good.
The goal then is to play trumps so as to best hold your losses to only one trump trick, if that is at all possible. If trump split 2-2, playing the A and low to the Q will lose only one trick. Also, anytime West has 3 trumps, playing low to the A and back to the Q will hold the losses to 1 trick. This play also works if West has a singleton K. Counting all the ways the suit can split and all the ways you win playing low to the A and back to the Q you see that line of play works for 11 out of the 16 possible trump splits. Not bad and clearly the way declarer should play trumps with no other information!
But wait a minute - you do have some key additional information to consider! East choose to double 6H. Clearly East expects to win at least one trump trick and probably has hopes for an outside trick. If East has 4 trumps or the KJ10, there is no way to make the contract. But what if East only has KJ7 or K107 of trump? Can you do anything? Yes - lead the Q and play the A over East's K. The J or 10 will fall from West and a lead of the 9 of trumps sets up dummy's 8 of trumps to pull the 7. Declarer played trumps that way and everything worked according to play. The result: declarer makes 6H doubled.
Why did declarer reject the play that works for 11 out of 16 ways that hearts can divide in favor of a play that only works for 8 out of the 16 ways hearts can split? Because the double by East pretty well eliminated all the holdings where West had 3 trumps or the singleton K of trumps and, without those possibilities, the lead of the Q of hearts becomes the best choice.
Note that without the double you would (playing correctly) lose two trump tricks and go down one.
Lessons
Be very careful when you double a contract based on a good trump holding and outside points that may not convert into defensive tricks. The double may talk declarer into playing the hand in a way that takes into account your trump holding and many of your defensive tricks may vanish. (This may also happen when you double based on length without good spots, say something like K7543.) It is also foolish to double when the bidding shows very distributional hands and you need outside suit slow winners like KQx or QJx combinations to win tricks.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 24 from Wednesday Morning, September 5, 2012.
The auction was 1H – X – 2C – P – 2H – P – 3D – P – 3H – P – 4H all pass. The opening lead was the 7 of spades.
First, a comment on the bidding. I opened the West hand 1H because I believe that if a hand is too strong for a weak two, it is an opening bid. It is very aggressive to open 1H but you do have 2.5 quick tricks which is better than any other 10 HCPs. After the opening bid, I rebid hearts at every time I could because I wanted to slow the bidding down. Finally, partner bid 4H because 3N didn’t look very good with only the Qxx of spades as a stopper. If you look, you will see that 3N has no hope since there are not enough tricks unless the heart finesse is on and hearts are 3-3, not very likely. And if the hearts are 3-3 with the finesse on, 4 hearts will likely also make.
Now to the play. As I teach my students, pause at trick one and make a PLAN (Pause to consider your objective, count your Losers, Analyze the situation, Now put it all together). When I went through that process, I was a bit depressed. It looked like best case, I have 1 spade loser, 1 heart loser (may have more), and 1 club loser. I might also have a diamond loser if the club ace is offside. So, first assessment is that I have somewhere between 3 losers (only if the heart finesse is on and the hearts are 3-3 and the club finesse is on) to 5 or 6 losers. But I opened this hand and now I have to play it. I played the Q of spades and it held which makes sense since N made a takeout double. I led the ten of hearts to the Q, hoping against hope that the heart finesse was on and the hearts were3-3. Then something unexpected happened!
The heart finesse won and North played the J. What did that tell me? South had 5 hearts to the K8. How in the world was I going to cope with a 5-1 break? Actually, it wasn’t really bad news because if South is relatively balanced, say 3-5-3-2 (spades, hearts, diamonds, clubs), I could shorten my trumps so that South’s five trumps will turn into a liability for him. My new plan was to ruff myself down to less trumps than South has.
I started with a club toward the K. North won the A and returned the Q. South followed to both clubs, phew, one hurdle overcome. Continuing with my new plan, I ruffed a club while South pitched a spade. I then cashed the A of spades because I didn’t want South to discard another spade and trump my A. South followed. Now I knew the exact count on South’s hand. He followed to 2 clubs and discarded on the third club. He had 5 hearts and 3 spades. Therefore, he had 3 diamonds, just exactly what I hoped for. So, now I led a diamond to dummy, ruffed a club followed by another diamond to dummy and another club ruff.
When I led this last club, South was down to all trumps so he had to ruff. I over-ruffed and was down to the A9 of hearts and the 9 of spades. South was down to the K86 of hearts. I led the 9 of spades knowing that South had to ruff. Now, South was down to the K8 of hearts and he had to lead into my A9 of hearts. I went from being pessimistic about making the contract to making an overtrick!
I recommend you lay out this hand and follow the play of thecards described above so you can see exactly what happened.
Lessons:
1. If you have a strong playing hand, you do not need as many high card points to open the bidding as you would need if you are balanced.
2. When a contract looks doomed, smile and be confident. Don’t let the defense know that you are worried.
3. Make a PLAN before playing even 1 card from dummy. Many contracts are lost at trick one because a card is played from dummy before you have a plan.
4. Sometimes a bad break can be good. In this hand, I was able to turn what appeared to be a bad thing into what turned out to be a good thing.
5. When something unexpected happens, pause to make a new plan based on the new information you have.
6. When an opponent has lots of trumps, sometimes you can make the bad break into an asset because, with lots of trumps, an opponent might find himself on lead at a good time for us.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Tom Clark |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 4 from Thursday morning 8-30-12 (Write-up from "Future Life Master" article)
When young, it is common for children to go to a playground to release their ever-growing energy...seeking dizzying satisfaction so-to-speak. That inner drive for dizzying satisfaction is what keeps us young.When once-upon-a-time was a playground...today, for many of us, it is the bridge table.
A playground and the bridge table...one commonality is a teeter-totter. On the playground it is jamming the legs into the ground and thrusting your playmate and yourself into thrill and laughter. In bridge, the fulcrum point on which to teeter or to totter is the scoring method. All bridge players...relatively new to the game or those vastly experienced...should learn/understand the scoring method, both truth and consequence...
· Matchpoints...take risks; hero or zero.
· IMPS...slippery slope; caution ahead.
In a matchpoint (pairs) game, where "comparative scoring" is used,overtricks and superior/percentage contracts are very important. Matchpoints are a swing-for-the-fences Babe Ruth approach to the game. As each pair is compared to all other pairs in the scoring, going for the gusto can pay large dividends. It can also be a disaster...a zero rather than a hero result.
In an IMPS (team) game, where "quantitative scoring" is used (converting a numeric score/result into IMPS and Victory Points) the primary concern is to fulfill the contract. IMPS is more of a keep-the-ball-in-play approach to the game. Thus, overtricks are of secondary importance. The contract is viewed as if a slippery slope. Therefore, caution is an important part of declarer strategy. Make the contract if possible. Worry about all else is an after-the-fact mentality.
Board 4 from Thursday morning, 8-30-12, illustrates this lesson.
One possible auction (there are many others) in a 2 over 1 game forcing system is shown in the bidding box…1H by north, 2D by south, 3C by north, 3H by south which announces the trump suit/fit, 4C Q-bid by north, 4D Q-bid by south, Key Card 4NT by north, 5S by south showing 2 controls and the heart queen, 5NT by north (promising the side has all controls and the trump queen) asking for specific kings not yet bid, 6D by south showing the diamond king…
Time for north to count winners before making the next bid…1S, 6H, 2D, 3C…there are 12 cashing tricks. The simplicity of a Grand Slam should be apparent through the bidding/ communication. To bid and make a 7H contract will likely require just trumping a club. But that is IMPS logic… slippery slope; caution ahead…safety first.
Playing matchpoints the same 12 cashing tricks are there. The question for north is should I go for the gusto… take risks; hero or zero. The thought process here targets 7NT…makeable facing the club jack, diamond queen, possible spade finesse, possible diamond finesse, possible club finesse and numerous squeeze potential. In matchpoints the possibilities are overwhelming.
Next time you are faced with a preponderance of is-the-risk-worth-it in matchpoints…Visualize and Make the Bid!!! Yes there are times you will go down. There are many othertimes, however, a hero rather than zero will come to light.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand # 22, Monday Evening, 8/20/2012
This hand is an interesting one to bid. The play, of course, is easy since you have 14 top tricks - so we are going to focus on the auction and a possible alternative auction.
West opens 2C since not only does he have 8 solid clubs, he has 21 HCP. East bids 2D to show at least one king (this bid is game forcing as well). Then West shows his club suit, East bids his 5 card heart suit and West continues to bid clubs with a 4C bid. East bids 4D, still trying to find a fit outside of clubs. West then bids 6C to show that clubs are not a problem.
Now East has a problem. As soon as partner opened 2C, he was thinking of a slam and seriously considering a grand slam since he has 13 HCP of his own. I know that I would bid 7C but it is certainly not clear to bid the grand. But I think that owning an ace and two kings justifies the 7C bid. Will it always work? No. But it certainly feels like it is odds on.
Why is this such a problem hand with the above auction? The reason, in my opinion, is that East has really not shown his hand. He has way more than his 21 HCP because of his solid 8 card suit. He actually has 10.5 tricks in his own hand and as soon as partner shows a king, he knows that 6C is odds on unless partner has only one king, namely the king of hearts. With the king of diamonds in partner’s hand, the slam depends on the location of the spade ace since he can get to dummy with the king of diamonds and lead toward the spade king. If partner has the ace of spades, then 6C is cold and seven might be available. The question, of course, is how do we find out exactly what partner has?
There is a nice convention which helps with a hand like this. After 2C, 2D by partner, a jump by opener (3S, 3H, 4D, or 4C) shows a solid suit, says that is trumps, and asks partner to cue bid an ace if he has it. So, on this hand, the auction would go 2C – 2D – 4C showing solid clubs and naming clubs as the trump suit. With the hand that partner has, he would bid 4S showing the ace of spades.
Now a grand might be possible. We need a red king. How do you find out about kings? My guess is that this is not an auction that has been discussed by many partnerships. I believe that 4N is the correct next bid. It is not Blackwood or RKC since we already know about the (only) ace that partner has. And, 4N is not passable since partner is clearly asking for more information. So, the only thing it can be is a king ask. On this hand, partner would bid 5D showing the cheapest king he has, the king of diamonds. Now we can count 13 tricks: 8 clubs, 2 spades, 1 heart, and 2 diamonds. So we bid 7NT and can claim before the opening lead is made (I don’t recommend claiming before the opening lead is made unless you and partner have discussed this kind of auction and you are sure that partner has the ace of spades and the king of diamonds).
Note that if partner did not have the diamond king but did have the heart king, we can still count 13 tricks because we know we can get to dummy with the ace of spades to cash the king of hearts. What if partner has no kings? He just bids 5C to deny an outside king. Then you can bid 6C or 6N because you can count 12 tricks: 8 clubs, 2 spades, 1 heart, and 1 diamond.
To summarize, the auction that I recommend is 2C – 2D – 4C –4S – 4N – 5D – 7N. This auction is a very rational auction getting you to the best contract.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 20, Friday, 8/17/2012
The auction shown is the only one where East/West reached the easily made 5D contract - out of six times the hand was played. In fact, no other East/West pair played diamonds at any level.
The hand offers several lessons in hand evaluation. West's opening 1S bid is clear but many Norths might choose to bid 2H instead of a double. However, it is reasonable to consider this powerful 5 loser hand too good to just overcall with. After all, if partner has as little as the JH and a club K or Q, it may be possible to make 4H. You show hands too good to overcall with a good 6 card (or better) suit by first doubling and then bidding your suit.
After North doubled East had an easy pass and South bid her 5 card club suit.
Now West, with a powerful two suit hand, bid 2D. In fact, West thought about jump-shifting to 3D since the hand was a 5-loser hand if partner had a fit for either spades or diamonds. But, being vulnerable and not knowing if there was a fit, West cautiously underbid.
North now showed a good hand with hearts by bidding 2H and East had a choice - support partner's diamonds or pass with several defensive heart tricks. Since West's 2 diamond bid may have been made on a much weaker hand and East was happy to play in hearts, he passed.
After South passed 2H, West was happy to have a chance to show her strength and shape by bidding 3D. North bid 3H and the spotlight was on East again. He could pass, double, support spades or support diamonds. Supporting spades would probably be putting partner in a 7 card fit - not generally a good idea. Doubling might cause the opponents to run to clubs - where they doubtless have a good fit. And, even with your 2 heart tricks, you can't be sure of setting a heart contract on this obviously highly distributional hand. What about supporting diamonds?
Partner has shown at least a 5-5 hand with good values by bidding all the way up to the 3 level vulnerable, despite knowing North had a strong hand behind her. You have an 8 loser hand in support of diamonds with valuable spade spots and a singleton club. Forget that you have only 8 points and no aces or kings. This has become a very powerful dummy for partner so East jumped to the cold 5D contract.
Lessons
1) When too powerful to overcall with a 1 suit hand, double first and then bid your suit. This shows over 16 points counting distribution and a good 6 card or longer suit.
2) Reevaluate your hand when you know you have a good suit fit with partner. Loser count methods are useful for this.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 9, 2012, Hand # 18
This seems a simple hand where every North/South pair reached 4S played by North and every pair made exactly their contract – doing what the hand record analyzer said they should. So why select it as a “Hand of the Week”?
Two reasons – first to look at how North might play the hand to maximize chances for overtricks and then to see how North (with a typical opening lead and double dummy play) can actually make an overtrick via an advanced play known as a trump squeeze. Few players would be likely to pull off this squeeze at the table, but it is fun to see how it works.
1. You are North and the JH is led. You have no spade losers if they split and 1 loser if they are 3-1. There are no heart or club losers. Diamonds, however, might have two losers. So North knows she will have to think about how to play diamonds to maximize chances for only 1 loser – or how to get the opponents to lead diamonds, thereby increasing her chances to lose only one trick.
North starts by winning the heart lead in hand (preserving the KH in dummy in case a later dummy entry is needed). Then she plays two rounds of trump and finds East still has the Q. So you give up the third round of trump and East leads a diamond following West’s discard signal of the 7D. Later on, North takes the diamond finesse and loses a second diamond, making only 4S. But, if the diamond honors had been split she would have made 5.
Assume, however, that East led a club or another heart after winning the QS. Eventually, you need to play diamonds yourself holding J105 opposite A63. What is the best way to play this suit to maximize your (slim) chances of 2 tricks?
The answer is to hope for a 5-2 split with one opponent holding a doubleton honor (any 4-3 split and you will always lose two tricks unless the defenders misplay and a singleton honor or a doubleton KQ are both much more unlikely than a doubleton honor). Say you decide, often based on the bidding or the play so far, that East is more likely to be the one to play for a doubleton honor. Then, you lead the JD from your hand towards dummy. If East covers, win the AD and a lead back to your hand sets up the 10D for a second trick. If East ducks, let the J ride to West’s honor and next drop East’s now singleton honor with the AD, again setting up the 10D.
What if you think West is the one more likely to have two diamonds to an honor? Then you go to dummy and lead a low diamond towards your J105. If West plays an honor, you finesse East for the other honor. If West plays low, your 10D will lose to East’s honor but the lead of the AD will drop West’s now singleton honor, setting up your JD.
The rule is as follows for playing a suit holding of 3 or 4 to an A opposite 3 or 4 to the J10: Decide which defender is more likely to have a doubleton honor and then lead from the hand immediately before that defender. That will give you the best chance of only losing 1 trick.
2. With the cards as they lie on this board, you will only make 4S even if you give it the best play as described above. Double dummy, how can you make 5S with the JH lead?
As before win the opening heart lead in hand and play 3 rounds of trumps. Assume East now leads another heart or a club. Save the KH for a dummy entry and play AC and ruff a club. Now play all but one of your trumps reaching this 5 card ending (with declarer North on the bottom):
-
K
A6
87
- -
10 -
982 KQ4
K QJ
2
4
J105
-
Next play a heart to dummy’s K and watch your right hand opponent squirm. If she pitches a club, you ruff a club setting up dummy’s 7C for your 11th trick. If she pitches a diamond, you play the A and 6 of diamonds leaving your hand good for the last two tricks.
What if East leads a diamond when in with the third trump? Duck in dummy and West wins and has to lead a club or heart. Win, ruff a club and again play all your trump but 1 reaching this 4 card ending:
-
K
A
87
- -
10 -
82 K4
K QJ
2
4
J10
-
Once more a lead to the heart K squeezes your right hand opponent. If she pitches a diamond, cash the AD and win the last two tricks in hand. If she pitches a club, ruff a club and dummy's AD and 7C win the last two tricks.
Lessons:
1. There are usually ways to play almost hopeless card combinations to maximize your trick taking chances and knowing them can get you critical extra tricks (even though in this hand the best way for playing J10x opposite Axx did not work).
2. The possibilities for fascinating double dummy bridge plays are almost endless. One example was shown by this trump squeeze end position – not because anyone is likely to play it that way but only for the fun of it.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand #1, 7/26
This hand, with an easy 12 tricks in spades, seems so simple - but then you ask "Why did only 3 out of 8 pairs get to slam?"
The auction shown was by one of the pairs reaching slam. North was the dealer and passed. East opened 1 spade and South passed. West had a choice of bids:
1) 2 diamonds
or
2). 4 hearts - a "Splinter" bid showing heart shortness, 4 or more spades and game going
values.
West selected the 4H splinter bid and now East can add up points. She has 16 and partner is showing at least an opening hand in support of spades. So, worse case, assume East has 10 high card points. Is 26 points enough to go to slam? Another way to look at it is that 10 points in the heart suit no longer matter and you have most of the remainng points in a 30 point deck.
East's hand has grown to slam values and the question remaining is whether East/West have the controls needed for 6S. A 4NT key card bid (1430) shows one missing key card and East can bid the slam.
Another way to reach slam is to use "Loser Count" methods.. East has a 5 loser count and can expect West to have no worse than a 7 count from the splinter bid. That means slam is reasonable if you have the controls to avoid 2 quick losers. Any type of Blackwood will confirm it is right to bid 6S.
How did most of the pairs miss slam? Two possibilities: they were counting points and decided they did not have enough for a slam or West chose to bid 2D instead of a splinter and that makes it much harder for East to go beyond game (fearing heart suit losers).
What can we learn from this hand?
1) You can go to slam with fewer high card ponts when you know partner has a singleton or void in a suit you don't have wasted values in.
2) Use your most descriptive bid when given the chance. In this case, the splinter immediately tells partner your shape, trump support and strength. It is tempting to bid 2D with such a strong suit but you know you will end up in spades and, after a 2D bid, it becomes hard to show your heart singleton.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Rosemary Kelley |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saturday Afternoon, July 21 Board 16
The 2NT bid by Responder is alertable as it is used as the Invitational bid to 3NT. At this point South knows that North did not have to have a four card major to make the “Stayman” 2 Clubs bid so South needs to inform the opponents.
Ordinarily I do not suggest opening 1 NT with 17 highs and a five card suit of any kind, as it is just too good! After three passes it is a little more understandable, and on this auction, South got to tell partner that there were 5 Spades with a max by bidding 3 Spades. And there would not be an issue of it had South not opened 1NT! North needs to invite with this 8 count and a five card suit, but does not wish to play Spades.
The whole point to this hand is about the defense and East is the defender under the gun. When West leads the 10 (or 9 if E/W are playing “coded 9's and 10's), South will duck to the Jack, trying to gather a ninth trick in that suit. East will win the Queen and needs to stop and think right now!
South has a maximum, 16 or 17, with 5 Spades. The Club suit is coming in, unless partner has specifically KJx or more. Your Queen of Spades is not well placed for your side. It looks like partner has the Ace of Hearts so can have only 4 more points, max. If West's four points are in Clubs, then your King of Diamonds is also poorly placed and declarer will be able to take 4 or 5 Spades, 3 Diamonds, and a Club. If you return a Heart to partner's Ace, the King of Hearts will make 9 tricks for declarer. So East has to hope partner's other 4 points include a Diamond card. A Diamond SWITCH is almost mandatory! Lead the 9 or 10, again depending on your conventional lead agreements from this holding, and keep the Jack of Diamonds in dummy “surrounded” by your King and10 or 9.
Note that Declarer will not be able to take enough tricks now, before your side gets 5. A Diamond lead by partner will not work, as you must get your Heart Queen in to set the hand. If West leads a Diamond on the go, South will have no choice but to lead to the Heart King and rise with it, if West plays low.
Two Pointers from this hand:
1. Try to count declarer's tricks. If returning partner's lead gives a trick to declarer, consider a switch. However, if setting up partner's suit is the only way to hold declarer to a minimum number of tricks, go ahead and return their lead. Make sure they can get in to cash.
2. Keep a Jack (or sometimes a 10) “surrounded” when you have one higher and 2 lower cards sitting after it by leading one of the lower cards.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thursday, 7/19/2012, Hand # 28
The auction is straightforward after West opens 1  . West ends up as declarer in 4  and North leads a low spade. Now declarer must take stock and plan her play. Most likely the losers are 1  , 1  and a club. If clubs split, there will be enough tricks for 4  and, if the Q  drops doubleton, 5  will make. Are there any other ways to make 5 ♥? If the A  is on-sides in North's hand and diamonds are 4-3, then possibly 3 club discards can be made off good diamonds. But, declarer must carefully preserve entries to dummy so as to both ruff a diamond and be able to return to dummy to cash good diamonds.
With this plan in mind, declarer wins the A  and leads a low heart to the J ♥ and next leads a diamond. North rises A ♦ (ducking would allow declarer to make 6  as the cards lie) and leads a spade to partners K  . South leads a club next and you rise A  , lead to the A  (happily seeing they split) and ruff a low diamond high. Now you lead to dummies A  and play diamonds.
Note that a 4-3 diamond split (which occurs slightly over 62% of the time) will give you all the rest of the tricks. But in this hand, South shows out on the third round and you only can pitch 2 clubs. Sadly, you play to the K  and your line of play is rewarded when the Q  drops - giving you 11 tricks.
Lessons
The proper line of play for over-tricks in this hand involves preserving entries to dummy so that you can make 5  whenever trumps split and either diamonds are 4-3 or the club Q drops doubleton. If you play two rounds of trumps early, you will not have the entries to dummy to pursue this line of play. Play your play at trick 2 and, in a duplicate game, it is the right strategy to aggressively pursue the best line of play for an over-trick.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Tom Clark |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 13 from Wednesday, July 11, 2012
The bidding shown on this hand is reasonably normal…including South bypassing 1S in favor of 1NTdue to her 4-3-3-3 flatness/balance. With a weak hand and club support, North made a 2C preference bid and South completed the bidding with the 2H matchpoint bid of playing a major when a minor is not clear cut.
Board 13 epitomizes the grind…scratching and clawing, if you please…in trying to maximize a matchpoint score in an effort to win or place in a game. N/S has done so in the bidding, but this hand is…in actuality…one for E/W on defense to figure out as the play unfolds.
The opening lead of the Spade King at trick one is certainly a possibility, but it fails to take into consideration the nature of bidding…that partner (West) must have points as both N/S have made limited bids throughout. Leading the spade King might produce three tricks, but this approach is likely (on routine hands) to come up short for the defense.
A more aggressive lead will often produce lottery results…in this case the singleton club. The opening lead of the club 9 exposes the suit to all at the table…true .But, it also…when the cards are right…allows the defense to score its greatest number of tricks. As the cards lie…2H should be defeated.
When the club 9 is led, West knows it should be a singleton because of the bidding.Therefore, winning the Ace on opening lead is a must. Give East a ruff at trick two by continuing the club suit. Usually when returning a suit for partner to trump, it is important to give suit preference indicating what East should return after trumping. In this particular case, it is not as important due to two things. First, the dummy’s AK of diamonds are compelling and certainly an obstacle in getting West in again for another club ruff. Second, with points and a 5-card spade suit surely West would have been in the auction. Thus ,declarer should have at least 2 spades in her hand.
Given this thoughtful assessment, East should be looking for another club ruff…either by getting to partner in the spade suit or perhaps partner has the trump Ace as an entry for another ruff. Time for East to lead…spades the best choice at this point. But which spade??? If East leads the spade King, partner might duck and not give East her desired ruff. A general rule here applies…if you want partner in, lead a card she will likely take, based on your card, if she can. Deduction; lead the spade Jack. If partner has the Ace she will win the trick and give you a ruff. If not, hope partner has the trump Ace. East’s choice is a bonanza. West wins the spade Jack with her Ace, gives East another club ruff, East cashes her spade King, the spade Queen fails, but partner has a natural trump trick for down one. Definitely this was a defensive grind…and rewarding.
It should be noted on this hand…the spade King at trick one produces the same results as long as East shifts to a club at trick two and the same defense is pursued.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 7 from Saturday June 23, 2012.
The bidding was 1C (S) – P – 1D – 1S – P –2S – X – P – 2N – P – 4H. Double was some sort of “do something intelligent, partner” bid. Opening lead: 5 of clubs.
**************************************************
This hand is an exercise in counting on defense. Focus on the West hand and dummy (South). Based on the bidding, what do we know? Declarer (North) has more diamonds than hearts and has at least 5 hearts so, therefore, declarer has exactly 11 red cards (because we can see 2 diamonds in dummy and 5 diamonds in our hand, we know that declarer has exactly 6 diamonds). When the declarer goes up with the A of clubs and follows suit, we think declarer has one club because, otherwise, he would take the club finesse. So, we have a complete count of declarer’s hand which should help the defense(1-5-6-1).
Declarer continues with a low club; there is no need for us to rise with the king because we know that declarer has only one club, since, remember, declarer did not take the club finesse. Declarer ruffs in hand and leads a diamond. Before partner plays on this trick, we know how many diamonds partner has: none. Declarer has 6, we have 5, and there are two in dummy. As expected, partner pitches an encouraging spade on this trick and declarer goes up with the king which we win with the ace. Now, should we give partner a ruff? I don’t think so because we know exactly declarer’s diamond holding and giving partner a ruff helps declarer set up his diamonds. Said differently, declarer is going to have to play diamonds himself before he draws trumps which will essentially give partner the ruff. And if declarer has to lead diamonds from hand, it is very beneficial to the defense. So, the best defense at this stage is to return a heart to take one of the hearts out of dummy. Declarer wins the heart return in hand and what does he do? If he leads the K of diamonds, partner can ruff, cash the A of spades and either return a heart or a spade and the contract is likely down two. If he leads a low diamond, you can win and now give partner a ruff. Partner can then cash the Ace of spades to beat the 4H contract one.
Lessons:
1. Listen to the bidding. Sometimes the bidding is so clear that everyone can picture declarer’s hand very early in the defense.
2. Having a count on declarer’s hand, you still must defend carefully. For example, on this hand, it is very tempting to give partner a diamond ruff, but analysis shows that that is not the best defense.
3. When you have lots of declarer’s second suit, the best defense is often to lead trumps so that declarer cannot ruff out your winners.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Rosemary Kelley |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday Evening, June 20th Board 13
Suggested Auction:
N E S W
Pass Pass 1NT Pass
3C* Pass 5C All Pass
* Invitational, 6 Card Club suit with 2 of the top three honors and nothing significant outside.
This hand is mostly about the bidding. How you and your partner use the 3 level bids over your opening 1 NoTrump will determine how you bid this hand. Luckily my partner and I had the perfect bid,as shown and explained above.
This hand doesn't come up often, but when it does, it is extremely useful to have this bid available. Basically, 3 Clubs here says to partner, “If you can use my suit in No Trump and have the other suits stopped, bid three NoTrump; otherwise, pass, as my hand is not good for you in any other strain.” I usually tell partners that they need one of A*x, xxx, or xxxx in support to make it work. The Ace can be the King or Queen, as the Club bidder has the other two honors. It was a pleasant experience when this hand came up and we were actually able to use our system to get to the minor game.
My Partner chose to try for the Club game, hoping that, even though 3 No Trump was a lock, there was an outside chance that clubs might make 6. True, if my red suits had been 2/3 and I had 2 Spades, a Diamond lead would most likely set 5 Clubs, but I had the magic singleton Spade, with that suit breaking 4/3. Besides, generally speaking, Aces are more valuable in a suit contract than in No-Trump.
I won the opening Heart Lead, then cashed the Spade Ace and ruffed a Spade. Now a Heart exit. The defense led a trump, trying to prevent the dummy from ruffing Hearts. A Diamond lead would have foiled my plans, but then there would be no story. I won the Club in my hand and ruffed a Heart in dummy. Now a second Spade ruff (3rd lead of the suit, second ruff) and a Heart ruff in dummy. Finally, a third Spade Ruff set up the 5th Spade for a Diamond pitch. The King of Clubs collected the outstanding trumps, a Diamond to the Ace allowed entry to the Dummy to pitch the losing Diamond on the good Spade. The score was +620 for a top (only one other pair reached game and they made 3 No Trump for +600).
Two Pointers from this hand:
1. On Offense, if dummy has a side 5 card suit,even if you have just one, check to see if there are enough entries to ruff out the opponents' cards in the suit and set up the 5th card. Note that the mostly likely split of the outstanding cards is 3/4 in that suit.
2. On Defense, if it looks like declarer is going to set up a side suit in dummy by ruffing, try to attack the side entries. Trumps are usually not the best entry to attack.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 8, Wednesday Morning, 6/13/2012 (Both sides Non-Vul)
Hands with long suits and lots of preemptive bidding often are the swing hands where many match points are gained or lost. Today's hand was off to a quick start when East jump overcalled North's 1D opening bid with 2S and West carried on to 4S after South's negative double.
North has a 5 loser hand and knows South has values (South should not double 2S without at least invitational values - since that typically forces North to bid on the 3 level). North therefore knows her side might have a slam but also knows it is generally wise to "payoff to the preempt" and not bid slams when your room to carefully explore has been taken away. So, North bid 5D. Note that slam would make without an unlikely heart lead, but that is because South has more than the minimum promised by the takeout double.
After passes by East and South, West had to decide whether to sacrifice or pass. Here is where the vulnerability at the table plays a major role. At favorable vulnerability, you can afford a 3 trick set and a 5S bid is clear cut. At unfavorable vulnerability, you should always pass. With equal vulnerability, as was the case here, the decision is not so obvious.
Say East has AKxxxx or AQxxxx of spades and can pick up the whole spade suit. Then, West's hand should produce 3 more tricks (2 ruffs and the ace of hearts) and a sacrifice might work - but 5D might be going down as well. So, unless you like to gamble or need a swing result, it is generally best to let the opponents play at the 5 level with equal vulnerability.
But West was courageous and bid 5S, doubled by North.
The play went as follows: QD, followed by the A and K of clubs and the AD. West ruffed in Dummy and cross ruffed hearts and minor suits until he had only trump left and gave up the AS. Down 2 for a successful sacrifice.
Note that the defense slipped up on this hand. After taking the first 3 tricks, North can easily picture East to have a singleton heart (South's takeout double promises 4 hearts). So, East will only take trump tricks and the AH. If two rounds of trumps are led, East will have a loser left in his hand after using up all of dummies trumps. North should lead a trump at trick 4 and South will win the ace and lead another spade, insuring that declarer goes down 3 for a bad match point result.
Lessons
1. Some rules of thumb: Consider the vulnerability carefully before preempting or sacrificing. At unfavorable vulnerability you almost never sacrifice at the 5 level. At equal vulnerability you have to be very careful before taking a bid that will almost surely get you doubled. And when you have the strong hand and opponents preempt, don't let them force you into bidding slams you cannot be sure of making - in other words, be content to "payoff to the preempt".
2) When defending against distributional sacrifice bids, it is often a good strategy to lead trumps to cut down declarer's ruffs in dummy.
A final note: Some might wonder why West did not open the bidding with a weak 2H bid. Three reasons - a weak trump suit, less than 5 high card points and a 4 card spade suit. In first or second position, you should not open a weak 2-bid holding another 4 card major - you might be preempting your own partner!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w - n - e - s
p - 3nt - p - 6nt
p - p - p
The contract is 6nt. The opening lead is the jack of hearts, won by dummy's queen. How do you play the club suit?
If clubs are 3-2, and there's a doubleton queen of clubs you can lay down the ace and king of clubs. If the queen doesn't fall, you will have to rely on the diamond finesse for your twelfth trick. So is that what you should do? Test the clubs, and then take the diamond finesse if necessary?
No.
The correct play is to take the diamond finesse at trick two. If it doesn't work, say a prayer then lay down the ace and king of clubs.
However, if the diamond finesse works, you have a safety play in clubs. Play a club to the ace, and if nothing unusual happens, lead a club towards your jack. This guarantees four club tricks, no matter how the remaining clubs divide. Here, if west plays low, you can play the jack, then give up a club. If west goes up, your jack will win later.
What if east had been the one with four clubs? West will show out, and your jack will lose to east's queen. Then you will win the heart return, come to your hand with a spade, cash your remaining two spades, and take the marked finesse of East's 10 of clubs.
As you can see, the safety play was necessary in today's deal. If you cashe the ace and king of clubs first, east scores two club tricks, and you will go down in a cold contract.
Suppose you were just trying to take as many tricks as possible, and weren't trying to play safe as is often the best strategy in matchpoints. I still think this is the correct way to play the club suit. Our club statistician and hand of the week editor, Paul Tobias, may correct me, but my gut tells me that after both defenders follow low to the ace, it is more likely that the suit will divide 4-1, then that the queen will drop doubleton. (Editor comment: correct, 4-1 is more likely.)
One last thing about the play: If, on this hand, west had risen with the queen, and then led a heart, the club suit will be blocked. You will have to give up one of your spade tricks to get to the board. However, you will still make game by repeating the diamond finesse. If it worked the first time, it should work the second time too. If not, you were never making the hand anyway.
A note on the bidding. I know some players who would not open one notrump with the north hand. It is pretty awful, but you have 15 points, and a balanced hand. That's exactly what 1nt promises. I like giving partner a clear description of my hand. I also like opening a notrump whenever possible for it's preemptive value. It's harder for opponents to bid over a notrump. That's why some pairs like to play weak notrumps.
North and South were using the Lebensohl convention. After east's overcall, South's 2nt bid required north to bid 3c, allowing South to further describe his hand. His cue bid of 3h, was game forcing staymen with a heart stopper. Without a heart stopper, South would have been 3h the first time. This would have also been Stayman but it would have denied the stopper. North, without four spades,was able to bid 3nt, even with only 3 small hearts. It's nice not to have to guess and hope.
With a five card suit headed by the AK, along with a well positioned queen of hearts, South can upgrade his 16 points and just go to slam, rather than merely invite.
| | | |
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Tom Clark |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand #12, 5/29 Morning
The bidding on this hand, potentially, could be all over the lot.
As dealer, west, though light on HCP’s, with 4-4 in the majors and favorable vulnerability is well-positioned to open 1D and give partner a single-raise if east has the opportunity to respond a major. Of course, a pass in first seat is more than reasonable…if not superior…intending to compete later in the bidding.
Sitting in second seat, whether or not west opens the bidding, north should pre-empt her hand. The main issue is how high??? Vulnerability and systemic agreement suggests “let the bidder beware.” On the other hand, partner is an un-passed hand and caution could possibly be stretched. The plot thickens.
East has the easiest hand to bid, regardless her partner opening the bidding in first seat!!! With anything less than a 5C bid by north (whether north is opening or overcalling), the east hand should overcall/respond in the heart suit. If east’s initial bid (response as an un-passed hand) is at the 2 or 3 level facing an opener by west, then east’s bid is forcing. Had west chosen not to open the bidding…east’s bid is merely a competitive overcall. In both cases, west has enough values to get the partnership to a game in hearts. Had North bid 5C, east should double rather than bid her heart suit.
South has no reason to bid having been warned off by the high-level pre-emptive bid by partner. A misfit seems overwhelming, in addition to a shortage in HCP’s.
North/South will do well to get out-of-this-hand without going for a doubled-number…the size of the number dependent on the level of preempt along with East/West doubling action, if at all.
All of the above seems to be routine thinking/explanation at the bridge table and in learning/understanding the game. Most North/South partnerships, given the vulnerability and get-in-get-out of the bidding preemptive ability, will be on defense rather than offense…barring a desire for a disastrous result. Stated more simply…there is a time to bid and there is a proper time to pull the Green Card out of the bidding box…even holding an eight-card suit.
Why then was this hand selected as the Hand-of-the-Week??? The lesson on this hand is not declaring a hand…playing offense. Rather the lesson asks the question…how well do you and partner communicate at the bridge table when defending a hand??? Between the open and limited game this hand was declared eleven times in Hearts…making ten or eleven tricks all but one time. Assuming east is declarer with the long heart-suit East/West should never make more than nine tricks if North/South are communicating with each other.
The short story…North/South should take the club King and three heart tricks. The long version is how!!!
Sitting south on lead against 4H, lead the Club King. After all, partner did preempt clubs. Now is the time to communicate the winning defense. It is north that will determine the outcome of this hand. The routine play of the club nine to signal partner…I like the club lead…is great on most hands, but not this one. Time to count!!! North can see eleven clubs (8 in her hand, 2 in dummy plus the club king that has been led). Assuming east follows suit…that will be 12 known clubs. If partner has the missing club…there are no more club winners. Why signal I like the club lead if this possibility exists??? Rather, north should be thinking…how can partner get to me to see if our partnership can win the other club trick in case south does not have the 13th club??? Rather than encouraging a continuation in clubs for a trick that will not cash if partner does continue the suit…north should be signaling attitude. Play the club Jack at trick one in response to the lead. It is an unusual signal considering partner knows you have lots of clubs. South should take note and trust your judgment!!!
Sitting south at trick two…what do you lead??? If north had played a small club under your King look to shift to a diamond at trick two as diamonds is the lower of the two unknown suits (hearts is known to be trumps). But, north signaled with a high club…the Jack. This asks for a spade shift…the higher of the two unknown suits. When east follows suit at trick one, south does as requested by north and is happy to see north trump the spade shift.
North…you got your wish. How do you proceed with it??? Try to cash the club Ace??? That was your thinking in getting partner to shift to a spade. Maybe, but if it wins will this beat the contract??? Surely east has the values for her bid. Or will you take this consideration into account…on second thought maybe there is something better??? If you can signal attitude…so can partner. Did you pay attention to which spade south led to give you a ruff??? Was it high signaling a diamond return or low signaling a club return (higher-lower, respectively, of the two unknown suits at this point)??? Or, was it innocuous??? And more, what story do you as north want to relate when you make your next play???
If south is properly communicating, she will lead a low spade for north to ruff at trick two…asking for a club return. North sees this and has two options. Play the Ace of clubs which will be the third trick for North/South if it wins. Or, under-lead the club Ace. Which is correct??? Remember there is only one missing club. If east has it, playing the Ace will win the trick. However, this is only the correct play if north has no more trumps (or south has no trumps, but remember south signaled for a club return…thereby, must be able to trump a club or has the club Queen…otherwise, she would not have encouraged a club return).
The red writing needs additional depth. Why does north not want to under-lead the club Ace if north has no more trump??? Because…if south trumps it (east playing the missing club Queen forcing south to ruff) north does not want south to lead another spade and risk losing a spade trick that could be won at a later point in the play. But if north has another trump, under-leading the Ace is far superior if south is forced to ruff the club. It is a strong statement to return a spade because I still am able to trump it…and, a stronger statement yet if north returns the club 10 encouraging south to return a spade in case south is ruffing (Do notice, if north does play the club Ace it will win as east has two clubs, but the contract will make unless south proceeds to trump north’s Ace and leads a spade for north to trump. How so??? East can discard her losing spade on the third diamond in West’s hand and avoid the spade loser).
Partnerships working together tell a far better story than when not…a key to success.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand #16, Sunday May 20th
The auction shown is one of the ways North can end up as declarer in 4♠. South's 2  bid promised support for spades and at least invitational values. North had a good overcall, but still just a 7 loser hand, and showed her second suit to give partner the decision whether to bid game or not. South, with excellent diamonds, went on to 4  .
Now the focus shifts to the defense: East dutifully led a heart and West cashed two heart tricks. Now came the critical moment for the defense. If West, fearful of giving up an overtrick by leading away from the K  , makes the safe lead of a trump, declarer will lose a trump trick and pitch the club loser on dummy's fifth diamond - making 4  .
This happened 9 out of ten times the hand was played. Only one pair made 10 tricks in spades (and they had stopped in 3  !).
But West, looking at dummy's diamonds and, especially if North had bid diamonds as in the auction shown, should reason that diamonds will provide 1 or two club discards for North and under leading the K  will not hurt even if declarer has the Q  and plays it. Even when North has not shown diamonds in the auction, the club under lead is not likely to hurt and could be necessary. In fact, North needs something like solid spades and 4 clubs to the Q for the under lead to cost anything. Anytime North has 3 or 4 diamonds, it will not cost and might be critical to lead clubs at trick 3.
Lesson
Many bridge hands have a critical moment for either declarer or defense when the right lead or play has to be made. Players learn to recognize these moments through bitter experience and to stop and think carefully when they come up. West had such a moment in this hand - but 9 out of 10 West players did not stop to think, choosing instead to make what looked like a safe trump lead.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand #6, Wednesday Morning, 5/16/2012
Bidding: at my table: E S W N
1h 2c! 2h? 3c
3h? p 4h? X
p p p
This hand is more in the nature of a bridge tip, than a careful analysis of a hand. The bidding was poor, at best, by everyone but North. South's overcall was terrible, West might have shown a limit raise in hearts, and East went against the law of total tricks by competing to the three level, vulnerable. (I guess I wanted to make sure I got my 100 honors.) West's bid of 4 wasn't awful, since he underbid slightly the first time, but still, his partner had not made a game try. North had a clear double.
But the bridge tip is this: When your partner doubles, you should just make the normal lead! How many times have I doubled, only to see partner go into the tank as he wonders, oh no, how am I going to defeat this contract? Partner then comes up with some complicated plan, maybe deciding that I'm short in some side suit, so he'll lead that suit, and then, when I get in with a trump, I'll lead back the suit we bid, and get my ruff. Or some such nonsense.
Remember, you're not the one who doubled. Partner did. He knows how he plans to set the contract. He expects you to make the normal lead.
There are exceptions of course. For example, if partner makes a Lightner double, it specifically calls for an unusual lead. Or, if the opponents are sacrifcing, it is often right to lead trump. But on this hand, the opponents may have been stretching, but they weren't sacrificing.
South, probably because her clubs were so bad, led the ace of diamonds, and North wrongfully encouraged, since she had the king.. A club lead would have easitly defeated the contract. Indeed, some declarers only managed seven or eight tricks. This declarer was able to ruff a diamond, set up spades, and make the doubled contract, despite the bad heart break.
Lesson: When your partner doubles a normal sounding contract, it's not up to you find a brilliant lead. Just make the lead that partner's expecting.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 2, Wednesday Morning, 5/9/2012
This hand gives an opportunity to discuss some points about how to bid (and how not to bid!) good slams (bad slams!).
Let's start by imagining East's thought process after seeing partner respond 1  to the 1  opening bid. If partner has the missing two aces and the Q of spades, a grand slam is either a favorite to make or virtually certain to make. Even if partner only has one ace and either the Q  or long spades, a small slam is either cold or might depend on the opening lead. All this is because East has a 4 loser hand and East had even considered opening 2  .
What is the best way for East to explore these slam possibilities? There is always a jump to 4NT - playing Roman Keycard that would get you to the grand if West held the two aces and the Q of spades - note that the jump after the 1  bid confirms spades at the trump suit for the keycard responses and West would show 2 aces and the Q  by a response to 4NT of 5  .
But, jumping past 4  might be putting the contract too high if West is missing all the important aces and kings - as was the case here. So, East should reject a 4NT bid in favor of a bid that shows his hand and leaves room for West to show slam interest (or no slam interest!). That bid would be a splinter bid of 3  (2  is a forcing reverse bid so 3  shows spade support forcing to game, slam interest and heart shortness). Many players would bid 4  to show this hand but we will use that bid to show something else later in this discussion.
After partner shows a strong hand with spades and a heart singleton, West should cue bid any ace he has, starting with the lowest level ace first. In this case, knowing his hand is useless for a slam and the heart K and Q most likely valuable only in a NT contract, West makes the most discouraging bid possible - bidding 3NT, showing points in hearts and clubs but no aces. East can pass and be in the only game that makes, or bid 4S and still get a reasonable duplicate score for going down 1.
So what would a bid of 4  by East after partner's 1  bid show? There are two uses partnerships might agree to that I can see for that bid - 1) to show a heart void, slam interest and a spade fit or 2) the same as 1) but also Exclusion Roman Blackwood - which is just Roman Keycard Blackwood with the A  not counting as a keycard. The Exclusion bidder usually has a void in the bid suit and very strong slam interest. For example, you might hold  AKxxx,  -,  AKxxxxx,  x and want to use Exclusion Blackwood after partner responds 1S. If partner bids 4NT as a response to 4  , showing 1 keycard that is not the A  , you can ask for the Q  with a 5  bid. Partner will respond 5  if holding the Q  and 5  otherwise. That way you can get to a grand if partner has either the Q  and responds5  , or if partner holds 6 spades, as you will have shown the AK of spades and a hand that expects to make 6  even when partner does not have the queen of trumps when you raise to 6  .
Slam Bidding Lessons
1) Value highly distributional strong hands with small loser counts but try to go slow and find out if partner has help for you in slam by asking him to cue bid rather than going into Blackwood immediately.
2) An unnecessarily high jump bid in a new suit shows shortness and, if no trump suit has been agreed upon yet, support for partner's last suit. A jump to a new suit beyond game after a trump suit has been agreed upon, at least by inference, is Exclusion Roman Blackwood. This can also be the partnership agreed upon meaning of a 4  bid in this particular auction.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 24 From Sectional Saturday Afternoon 3/5/2012
This hand exposes a problem many club bidders have when it comes to evaluating slam possibilities. The auction at my table was as shown. At 23 other tables there were similar auctions, most often ending in 4S making 7 - only once in 24 times did North-South bid to the cold 6S slam.
Look at the South hand. If there is a fit in either clubs or spades it is a very good 4 loser hand. In fact, with a void and two long, good suits, it is the kind of hand that often does even better than the loser count expectations. Look at the the auction at my table: after North jumps to 4S, South clearly has the values to make a 5C cue bid - not a natural takeout of the spade contract because, if South were uninterested in spades, why double?
After the cue bid, North should cooperate by cue-bidding her ace and saying 5D. South now might just bid the 6S slam or even try for a grand by cue bidding 5H. In that case, North has bid his hand to the maximum and will bid 5S and South will end the auction with 6S.
Similar auctions should take place if West does not preempt or if East raises the preempt in hearts to 4H.
So why did 23 out of 24 North-Souths fail to reach slam? South probably counted points and decided her 16 high card points had been adequately shown by the double of the preempt. After all, that forces partner, a passed hand, to bid at the 3 or 4-level. But when partner shows values and a spade fit (with the jump to 4S in the auction shown, or even by bidding 4S over a 4H bid by West), then loser count should replace point count and convince South to bid on in search of a slam. After all, even if North held as little as 4 spades and just one of the black kings or the ace of diamonds, there would probably be a play for slam and 5S would be a reasonable contract.
And for the 1 pair out of 24 pairs that actually bid to 6S - congratulations Charlene and Virgil, a well deserved top!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 27 from Tuesday, April 24, 2012.
This is another hand like last week - no clear cut bids, only the best of several choices, any of which could be wrong. The suggested bidding: P – 1D – 2C– X – P – 2H – P – 3D – P – 3S – all pass.
Say you are sitting East with your 4243 10 count and the bidding goes 1D by partner, 2C by right hand opponent. What do you do? I see three alternatives:
1. 1) double
2. 2) raise diamonds
3. 3) pass
None of these alternatives look very appetizing. Passing is not a real choice since you have 10 HCP and, therefore, it is your side's hand. Usually, when you make a negative double in this auction, you should have at least 43 in the Majors. Raising diamonds is a viable alternative although you run the risk of missing a 4-4 spade fit and, if you raise diamonds, should you raise it to the two level or to the three level? So, what to do. None of the alternatives outlined look particularly good - but you have to choose the one most likely to work.
Try a negative double. If partner bids 2S, then you can decide whether to raise to 3 or to pass. What if partner bids 2H? Then you can bid 3D and hope that partner realizes that you have 4 spades (why did you double since you, obviously, don’t have hearts). If you double, then you should end up in 3 spades, the best of a bad situation. And you know that your bid probably gave the partnership the best possibility of finding the right strain and level.
The play in 3S really depends on the opening lead and subsequent defense, but it looks like you will lose 2 hearts, 2 spades, and 2 clubs for down 2. But since they can make either 2 hearts or 3 clubs, all is not lost and down 2 will get good match points.
Lessons: 1. When it is your hand, you have to bid something that helps you and partner find the best strain. Sometimes it is awkward but remember that there are some 635 billion possible hands and you have only 38 possible calls so many hands do not fit into the normal bidding structure.
2. A negative double should show support for the two unbid suits. But, when partner opens 1D, you have some flexibility if you have support for diamonds since if partner bids something that is awkward given your hand, you can always return to diamonds. This thought will handle some awkward hands but you probably should tell partner that you might not have support for clubs when he/she opens a diamond but rather may have support for diamonds in addition to the Major or Majors.
Editors Note: In retrospect, it seems to me that East should not have opened with only 12 points and an 8 loser hand. However, when I held the East hand I did open 1D because the lure of having both majors was too tempting. My partner doubled 2C as in the shown auction and we ended up down two in 3S for a good match point score. However, I would have bid 2S instead of the 2H bid shown in the recommended auction (at my table North raised to 3C and I bid 3S), since I much preferred partner lead a spade if on defense, instead of a heart, and I expected partner would be prepared for my bidding spades when she doubled. Note that if we reverse the location of the heart and club kings, 3S would have made and only the 4-1 spade split would defeat 4S.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wednesday Morning, April 18, Hand # 26
Sometimes good hands like those held by East and West are difficult to bid.The auction shown occurred at my table and the fact that only 2 out of nine East-West pairs got to the easy 3NT contract illustrates how hard it can be to bid many hands to their full potential. Both East and West have tough second bids. East has a 4 loser hand in diamonds and 17 high card points. A jump to 3D seems an underbid but it is very hard for East to bid 2NT or 3NT and a cue bid of 3C would be more appropriate if East held a solid diamond suit and wanted partner to bid 3NT with a club stopper. While it is true East would have bid 3D with only a 6 card suit, that bid was probably the conservative choice made by most of the field.
Now it was up to West. With a 4 card club suit to the Q9, the A  and three diamonds, West felt 3NT would have good play after an expected club lead. So, even without a heart stopper, West made the winning call of 3NT. West was expecting to make 6 diamond tricks, a club trick, a spade trick and at least one more trick from partner's 16 - 18 point hand. As the cards were, after a J  lead West made 4NT (tied for top) and there were double dummy lines of play that could have yielded 12 tricks - win the K♣, cash 7 diamonds and the A ♥ coming down to three spades and the Q♣ in hand. North has to come down to the A  and three spades to the Q. Cash the K  and lead a club to endplay North for the last two tricks.
The analysis program says the hand can make 6 and it is interesting to see how this can be accomplished after a lead of the Q  . You have to assume the diamond finesse is on so you lead the K  and a spade to the A. The10  lead from dummy finds North's K and you next lead the diamond 8 to dummy's 9  . That pulls all the trump and you still have another entry to dummy with dummy's 4  . You want to try to set up a spade winner and, since North bid and had a singleton diamond, it is reasonable to play North for 4 spades to the Q. So, you lead the J  and ruff the Q  and see the 10  fall from South. Using the 4  as an entry to dummy, you cash the 9  and pitch your losing heart - making 6  .
A final comment on East's second bid: East can reason that all he needs to make 3NT is an entry to dummy and the diamond finesse on-sides with the K  falling on the first or second lead of the suit. So, if West has a few diamonds and either the A  , the K  or the K  , then 3NT will likely have play. Therefore, a second call of 2NT or even 3NT, while aggressive, is certainly worth considering.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand 1, April 12, Morning - None Vulnerable, North the Dealer
Reopening with a Double for Partner
Playing disciplined weak two's North easily passed his 6-5 hand and East opened the bidding with one Club. South bid one Heart, West passed, North passed and East PASSED!
What is wrong with this bidding? If East-West are playing negative doubles, East is expected to reopen with a double for his partner. Why? Because it is part of playing negative doubles! Partner may have wanted to make a penalty double but cannot because of playing negative doubles, so East needs to protect him by doubling for him.
Players often make excuses for NOT reopening with a double (some say they didn't even know it was part of negative doubles!) and few are valid. There are, however, some exceptions to reopening (covered next), but most of the time, it is right to do it.
When would East NOT want to reopen with a double?
1) If West was a passed hand.
2) He has long Hearts (and therefore knows partner most lkely would not pass the double).
3) He is very distributional, such as a two suited hand and needs to bid his second suit or sometimes rebid his first suit (a long one). In other words, his hand cannot stand a penalty double because of his lack of defense or his strange distribution.
What did East-West miss on this hand? They missed a NT game (Deep Finesse says only 2 No Trump can make - however 4 pairs bid and made 3NT since a diamond lead is unlikely, especially from South) or in this case they might have missed 1 Heart doubled, down 3 for +500 and a TOP board! If, after a reopening double, North takes out the doubled contract by bidding 1S, then East-West will most likely bid and make some number of NT.
The play of one Heart was sad with a Club out, Declarer managed to collect 2 Diamond tricks and one Spade ruff and West was endplayed at the end of the hand, so declarer also got the King of Hearts. On a 7 top, North-South got a 4 and East -West got a below average 3 when they could have had a top!
Bridge is game of shared responsibility and trust. When your partner trusts you to use the reopening double, don't let them down! You will find yourself getting unexpected tops with numbers like + 500, +800, or even + 1100.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle. |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is an interesting hand from 4/5/12,. Board 16, East -West Vulnerable and West the Dealer.
Handling a GOOD Hand: Preempt or Not Preempt?
What would be the best bid for North over West's 1 Spade for this good hand with so few losers? Many options are available, namely doubling or bidding 2, 3, 4, or 5 Diamonds. Overcalling 2 Diamonds is an option that usually shows you have defensive tricks and keeps open the possibility of playing 3NT. Passing is not an option!
Preempts have several uses. Some of these are
1) Jamming the bidding to make it hard for the opponents.
2) Conveying to partner your side might want to make a sacrifice (the vulnerability really comes into play in this case).
3) Bidding to make with a highly distributional hand when you are more afraid of the opponents having a good contract or sacrifice (if given room) than of your side missing a slam.
Which of these look right for this hand or should you just overcall 2D or perhaps double to show high cards and many tricks when you later bid your suit? A 3D or 4D bid would say to partner that you have little or no defense and 6 or 7 tricks in diamonds so these are out because you have at least 2 quick tricks and 8 or 9 tricks of offense. A double is dangerous as you don't have hearts and the last thing you want to hear from partner is hearts at a high level (in this case it might go double, 4S, 5H). Overcalling 2 Diamonds does show values and you may hear from your partner if they have anything, but you do not stop the opponents from finding their best spot and you are afraid that might be hearts. So we have a leading choice which is 5 Diamonds. This says you have many playing tricks and does not deny defensive values. (and also uses the rule of 2 and 3 - down 2 vulnerable and down 3 non-vulnerable). If partner has any help we have a good shot at making this! However, team of 4 players who don't spend much time considering "what the field will do" will probably prefer to bid 2D.
The results on this in matchpoints were: 2 pairs in 6 Diamonds were doubled and down. Out of 3 pairs in 5 Diamonds, 2 made it for top boards, probably on spade leads and one went down 1. One pair was in 4 Hearts and down 1. One East West Pair went to 5 Spades and went down 2 vulnerable (not doubled, but should have been!) for -200.
The play with a spade out is pretty straightforward. Take the first spade and ruff a spade on dummy. Eventually you will lose a heart and the king of trumps. Contract made if 5D. But, against 5 or 6 diamonds East should lead a singleton heart knowing he will get in with the K of diamonds and still have a trump left if a ruff is possible. West, after winning the heart lead, should kill dummy's possible spade ruff by leading trump. The defense will then take 2 spades, 1 heart and one diamond. Another reason East should not lead a spade is clearly North is expecting that lead and may even be counting on it - how often have you held an Kx or AQ in the opponents suit and made your bid counting on them leading that suit?
On the displayed bidding, one possible way to end up in 6D, North can pass 5S and get a top. It is a tough decision since North figures to have at least 2 defensive tricks. However, the general rule "When in doubt bid on highly distributional hands" will lead many North's to go on to the 6 level with favorable vulnerability and fear that the diamond ace won't cash..
Editors note: When 4 experienced players were asked, 2 would have bid 5D and two would have bid 2D. The convincing argument for the 5D bid was that it was more likely to be the choice of the field and unless you needed to go against the field to improve a non-winning game, the preempt is a better choice.
|
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, March 30, Board 16.
The bidding put E-W in the wrong spot, but if N-S didn't defend properly, they could walk away with a top.
First a note on the bidding. West was afraid to show her hearts after 1NT because she didn't have ten points. If you play New Minor Forcing, a bid of two hearts here would have been weak. So she could have bid two hearts safely. Opener should either pass 2H, or in this case, correct to spades. Most of the field was in two spades making three.
But the more interesting point to this hand is the defense to 1NT. Declarer wins the diamond lead, and leads a low spade toward dummy. If South plays second hand low, declarer will finesse. If North takes the king, the hand is all over. E-W could possibly take 10 tricks if N-S don't find the club shift, not easy from either side.
But look what happens if South makes the anti-intuitive play of the spade queen on the second trick. If declarer ducks, E-W will get two spade tricks. If declarer takes the ace, North can wait to win the third round of spades, thereby killing the suit.
This situation is fairly common. When dummy comes down with AJ10xx of a suit (or longer) and no outside entries, it is often right for the hand in front of dummy to play second hand high!
Of course, another way to cut declarer off from dummy when South plays low is for North to not win the K on the first lead. However, this gives declarer two tricks and an opportunity to play other suits. South rising Q only gives declarer one trick if he has a doubleton (perhaps no tricks if he ducks and later finesses again!). Declarer will lose two tricks if he has three spades and plays safe by ducking twice so he can eventually run the suit.
|
A final bidding note (added by the editor): A convention you might want to try - used by several BCA pairs - is to bid 2H after partner opens a minor to show a hand with less than invitational values and at least 5 spades and at least 4 hearts (usually 5 - 4). You lose the strong jump shift to 2H or the weak jump shift to 2H but this would work perfectly on this hand and often works with many problem hands with few points and both majors..
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Tom Clark |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Hand # 15, 3/21/2012 Evening Game
For some players…generally less experienced…the recommended bidding will seem foreign. Newer to the game players holding the North cards will be more inclined to bid one of two things over South’s 2NT opener…
· Stayman this hand. But then, over South’s 3D response North will follow with a forcing 3S bid to show a 5-card spade suit…giving opener the choice of contracts, NT or spades (if you do not know…all bids after employing Stayman are game forcing). The problem with this bidding approach is the weaker hand will play the spade contract, thereby exposing the strong hand’s values/tenaces to the defenders. Additionally, there is a message in this Stayman-bidding sequence being indicated by North that he/she also has a 4-card heart suit, otherwise North would have…
· Jacoby this hand. The problem with transferring this hand to spades and following with 3NT is the loss of searching for a 4-4 heart fit that, had North employed Stayman,would have been discovered (and no, for those players thinking a transfer to 3S followed by a bid of 4H would be acceptable…it is not. This sequence promises a minimum of 5-5 in the majors and asks opener to choose which suit to play the final contract in game).
Many players…generally more experienced…subscribe to a combination bid devised by the late expert, Mike Smolen, to address the type of hand shown here. Though his device was introduced originally as a treatment in response to a 1NT opener, it has been adapted to 2NT openers. His convention…
Smolen Transfer…a modification of Stayman and Jacoby Transfer Bids for game-going holdings by the responder who has a distribution of 5-4 (or 4-5) in the majors, and bidding in such a manner that the No Trump opener becomes the declarer.
In its original format, after the sequence (opener) 1NT,(responder) 2C Stayman, (opener) 2D no 4-card major, a jump to the 3-level by responder in his/her 4-card major announces…game values, 5 cards in the unbid major and asks opener to bid 3NT or correct to the other major with 3-card support. This allows opener to become declarer in either contract.
Adapting this concept to 2NT openings became commonplace for many…(opener) 2NT, (responder) 3C Stayman, (opener) 3D no 4-card major, (responder) bids his/her 4-card major indicating the same as above…game values, 5 cards in the unbid major and asks opener to bid 3NT or correct to the other major with 3-card support. This allows opener to become declarer in either contract (the only difference - there is no jump to the3-level as the bidding is already there).
This explains the recommended bidding shown in the bidding format. North indicated a hand that was 5-4 in the majors with minor suits shortness. South completed the bidding with 3NT and a reasonable pictureof North’s hand.
The play of the hand is unique as well. After a 4th best club lead to the King and Ace…South should pause…count sure winners (7…3spades, 1 heart, 2 diamonds, 1 club), add in likely winners (2…both in diamonds), factor in additional possible winners (3…2 spades, 1 diamond), then plot a course in hopes of maximizing tricks…all the while protecting against the danger hand; LHO, who is likely holding the Q10 of clubs.
After winning the club Ace, cash the spade King then play the spade Jack and overtake it with the Queen. Cash the spade Ace, discarding a heart and be pleasantly content when spades are 3-3 in opponent’s hands. Cash the spade nine discarding another heart, but do not get ahead of yourself. Stop and Think!!! If declarer cashes the last spade, either a club or diamond must be discarded…
· Discarding a club exposes declarer to going down if the diamond finesse is taken for the Queen and it loses…the defense can cash 4 club tricks before declarer recovers.Yes this provides maximizing tricks opportunity but is not a sound choice by declarer.
· Discarding a diamond on the 5th spade protects the club threat but reduces the possible number of diamond winners from five to four if the finesse for the Queen works. If choosing this approach, declarer has no chance to maximize trick potential.
Can declarer still go after the maximum trick-potential without unduly risking and/or lessening the contract/potential??? YES, DO NOT CASH THE FIFTH SPADE!!! Rather, after cashing the 4th spade, lead the diamond Jack…
· If RHO does not play the Queen…take the finesse. If LHO wins the Queen, clubs are still protected…declarer will make five (either by defenders cashing the club Queen or by re-entering dummy with the diamond 10 and discarding a club on the 5th spade, losing a club at the end).
· If the finesse for the diamond Queen works, declarer is still in the dummy. Now is the time to take that Leap of Faith. Play the 5th spade and discard a club. Then lead the diamond 10 to finesse again. (If RHO originally covers the diamond Jack, simply re-enter dummy with the diamond 10, cash the 5thspade discarding a club and lead a diamond to your hand). Assuming this works declarer will make 12 tricks reaching the potential of the hand and having done so with a safety net plan in mind throughout. Of course, LHO might be a fly in the ointment here (ducking Qx or Qxx of diamonds). If so, pay your LHO a compliment, but know your plan was sound.
(Caveat to this writing…Puppet Stayman players will find it difficult to bid as recommended due to the alteration of opener’s responses and/or responder’s follow-up bidding).
|
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 14 from Tuesday, March 13, 2012.
Suggested auction: 1D – P – 1N – 3S – 4C – P – 4S – P – 5H – 6C – P – P – P.
There are lots of variations on the auction depending how the opponents interfere and with which suit. This was the auction at our table.
There is an interesting problem with the hand when N bids 3S. You would like to jump shift with a 20 count but jump shifting into the five level leaves no room. If you jump to 5C, partner will have no opportunity to show a feature, if appropriate. If you choose 4C, it is almost forcing. Almost forcing because if partner has all of his assets in Major Qs and Js, it would be clear to him that his values are wasted.
Aces are always valuable and supported Kings are often very useful. After 4C, partner’s hand becomes gigantic with 6 card club support, an Ace in the preemptor’s suit,and a supported king which seems useful on the auction. In order to convey the (now) good hand he has, Partner chose to bid 4S rather than making a simple raise to 5C. Over 4S, I thought we might even make a grand slam (change his heart king to the diamond king and the grand is cold), so I bid 5H. I intended to convey that I had both red suit aces and was looking for a filler in the diamond suit. 5H is a grand slam try because if I wasn’t interested in a grand slam, I would just bid 6C. Of course, without any help in the diamond suit, partner just bid 6C and that ended the auction. The play was simple: six is cold by drawing trumps and the overtrick depends on the diamond finesse.
How might the auction go if S overcalled 1H as many with the S cards would do? I think W will still bid 1N and now what will N bid? He might raise hearts or he might still preempt in spades. If he raises hearts, as most would do, then E can bid 4C and now the auction will continue in much the same way as before except it will be difficult for E to convey his interest in a club grand slam. I think EW should get to 6C with either kind of interference by the opponents, since E has such a strong hand and W has such good trump support with two outside controls.
This hand was played 18 times at the BCA and slam was only reached 4 times.
Lessons:
1. 1) Point count is only a guide and this hand illustrates that. Once E bids 4C, W’s hand is worth way more than the 7 HCPs he holds.
2. 2) When partner makes an unexpected bid which makes your hand grow, you should make a bid which conveys the fact that your hand is now worth more than you have admitted to. On this hand, bidding just 5C would be a big underbid. You would bid just 5 clubs with a hand like QJx, KTx, xx, xxxxx.
3. 3) A cue bid is a good wayto convey that your hand is stronger than might be expected. On this hand, when you bid 1N, partner is expecting a balanced hand with 6-9 HCPs. When partner freely bids your unbid six card suit, and you hold an A and a K, your hand has become gigantic. Tell partner the good news with a cue bid.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 1 From Tournament Morning Session, 3/9/2012
This was the auction at our table (not the recommended way to bid the West hand, as we will discuss in this write-up).
West has a problem after the third hand 1 Spade opener. Should she bid one of her suits or make the Unusual NT 2 minor suits bid of 2NT? Here are recommended guidelines for partnerships to agree upon in these situations:
1) With a weak 2- suit hand trying to interfere and suggest a sacrifice - use Unusual NT or Michaels immediately.
2) With a good 2-suit hand in the normal opening high card range (roughly 11 or 12 to 16), just overcall with the higher of your suits, intending to bid the other one next if the auction and the vulnerability allow.
3) With a very good 2-suit hand (usually 17+ high card points), make the Michaels/Unusual NT overcall, intending to show you are in this upper range by taking a later bid (minimum range Michaels bidders make their one bid and then stay silent!).
So what do we recommend West do after the 3S bid and a pass from partner? Clearly the lower level Unusual NT hand would pass - opponents have stopped short of game and you are happy with that. With the powerhouse that West actually had (18 high card points in the minors), she has to bid again. A bid of 4 of a minor should show a 6 - 5 hand upper range hand with 6 in the suit bid. With 5-5 in your suits, show an upper range hand with a double. Of course, all this should be discussed and agreed upon by the partnership.
After a double by West and a pass by North, East would have to do some thinking. There is a 2 suit fit in the minors and East also has an Ace to take care of one of West's major suit losers. Making 5 of a minor may be cold or may require a finesse. Remember that West forced to the 4-level and you fit both of her suits and also have an Ace. Accordingly, a cooperative West should bid 5 of either minor - which will easily make and may even make 6 if North tries for a ruff by leading the singleton J of diamonds against a 5C contract.
So how did the field do on this board? 6 out of 20 pairs stopped short of game. Two tried a slam, probably bidding over 5 Spades, and went down. 11 out of 20 pairs bid game in a minor - very well done for all of them! And one pair was doubled in 4 diamonds for a top - that's another lesson (don't double highly distributional hands unless you have a clear set, which usually requires trump tricks you know will cash!).
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March 2, 2012, Hand # 13
The bidding illustrates a very common agreement: after partner opens 2C and an opponent overcalls a double is the same as a negative response - less than 2 Queens and no Kings or Aces. After North doubles many South's would pass. After a bid of 3NT by South, however, North was happy to declare in 4S. The same contract would probably be reached if East opened with a weak 2 Diamond bid.
Plan the play after the lead of the Club 6.
You can lose 1 club and between 1 and 3 hearts. The goal is to avoid losing 3 or even 2 hearts, if possible. From the lead and the auction it is likely that West has all the remaining high clubs. So, you plan to eliminate diamonds, while pulling trumps, and then throwing West on lead. Win the A of Clubs, play A of diamonds and ruff a diamond. Then, play a spade to dummy, pull the last trump and ruff the last diamond in dummy. Now get out a club, putting West on lead. West has few options: he can lead the stiff King of Hearts or else give declarer a ruff and a sluff by leading a club.
Assume west leads the K of hearts. You have to lose at least one heart trick so you should duck this all around. If West has another heart you have all the rest of the tricks. If West had only 1 heart, he must give you a sluff and a ruff for all the rest of the tricks.
What if West does not lead the King of hearts - playing a club instead? You ruff in hand with your next to last trump and stop to consider. You have lost one trick and must lose at least one heart no matter how they are split. If you finesse the Heart Queen and it loses to the K and another Heart is played you will make exactly 4 Spades. If the finesse wins, you will make 5. Is there any way to improve on the finesse? There are two possibilities: you play to the A of Hearts and, if nothing drops, play a low heart. This wins whenever West has either the K of hearts doubleton or the J of hearts doubleton and he doesn't unblock the J under the A. If he does unblock the J (or even if he doesn't) you can play a trump to hand and lead up towards the Q of hearts. You will make 5 whenever West has anything other than 3 Hearts to the KJ or K10. But, as the cards actually lie, the A of Hearts drops the K and you easily make 5 spades.
What about the play in 3 Clubs doubled if South passes partner's double? It should go a diamond followed by a diamond ruff followed by a spade and another diamond ruff. now a heart to South's Ace and the Ace and another club will set the contract 3 unless West has carefully unblocked and knows the lowly 6 of Clubs will win in dummy allowing him to cash a diamond and pitch his last spade loser.
Finally, what actually happened on the hand? Several pairs, not taking advantage of the negative value showing double, got up to 6 Spades going down 1 or two. Other pairs playing in 4S did not ruff out the diamond suit before playing a heart to the Q and managed to go down in their contract or just make 4 Spades, Only 2 pairs made 5 Spades (unfortunately, one was by me and we were in 6S!).
Lesson pointers:
1) Remember the "negative showing" double after partner's 2C bid is overcalled.
2) Eliminate side suits and look for opportunities to throw opponents in to force them to lead either a ruff and a sluff or another suit that helps you.
3) When playing a suit like the Heart suit in this hand where you have to lose at least 1 trick even if the K is on-sides, it is often better to play the A and later lead up to the Q and then decide what to do at that point. Especially when you suspect the K is off-sides, you can duck the second lead and hold your losers to one.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 2 from Friday, February 23, 2012
3 No Trump or 4 of a Major at Matchpoints?
Hands like this are why we spend lots of time THINKING while playing bridge. You have a 6 card Heart suit and partner opens a Diamond, you bid 1 Heart and partner jumps to 2NT. Partner has 18 or 19 points so the question is what is the best game? So you try NEW MINOR FORCING (3 Clubs) and partner bids 3NT (denying 3 hearts). Now is the time for weighing your hand and here are a few thoughts:
1) I have a six card suit and 9 scattered points. Partner usually has 2 hearts on this auction but not always. We have at least 27 high card points between us.
2) I have a singleton, but it is in partner's first bid suit, so that should be okay.
3) It is possible that 3NT makes and 4 of my major does not.
4) This is Matchpoints and it might make the same number of tricks in NT as 4 of a Major ( so 630 beats 620!).
5) Partner will be playing the hand and he has the stronger hand possibly with several tenaces (it is almost always good to have the lead coming into the strong hand).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So you make your decision and pass 3NT this time. This is by no means clear cut! Sometimes, you need to go with your hunch and not the cut and dried rules. Remember, every hand is different, so don't think you have to always do the same on every hand. Many players force the contract into NT to gain that extra 10 points - only to find it makes more tricks playing in a suit!
Declarer gets a Spade out, loses the king and wins the next spade with the queen in his hand. Now he leads the Heart Queen! This is before his LHO can see partner's discard and has no idea whether to grab it or not. LHO ducks the Queen and Partner rises with the King! Now partner leads the club 10 and finesses for the king. It loses and declarer wins the third spade lead. After cashing clubs and ending in dummy, declarer finesses the J of diamonds, 3NT makes with 2 Spades, 1 Heart, 3 Diamonds and 3 Clubs.
Can 4 Hearts be made? It sure looks like you have 2 Heart losers and a loser in Clubs and Spades. Double dummy you could possibly make it without a club lead by finessing a Diamond and discarding the Clubs away on a good Spade and 2 good Diamonds...very difficult and doubtful many would take this unusual line of play.
In the Open Game this board was played 9 times and 5 pairs are in 3NT making 3 or 4, one pair is in 2 NT making 2 and 3 pairs are in 4 Hearts and down 1.
In the Limited Game this board was played 7 times. 4 pairs are in 4 Hearts down 1 and 3 are in 3NT making 4.
Yes, it is true that perfect defense will set 3NT. But that is much harder to do than setting 4 Hearts and did not happen once in the 8 times the hand was played in NT.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Rosemary Kelley |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand # 5 Friday, Feb. 17th
Dlr: N
Vul: N/S
Suggested Auction:
North East South West
P 1S P 2C
P 2H P 3D
P 3H P 4N
D 6DP 7H
All Pass
Opening lead: not relevant
Bidding Commentary:
East has a problem: if the hand is opened 1 Spade.there is a rebid but if no fit is found and partner ends up in NoTrump they will be disappointed in your high card strength. However, there are two good reasons for opening the hand:
1. There is a real chance that you will find a major suit fit and the hand is a 5 loser hand, and;
2. With only 10 HCPs there is a possibility that the hand will be passed out and you would be very unhappy if your side does indeed have the major suit fit.
Playing Two Over One, West starts with 2 Clubs, his better suit. When East bids 2 Hearts, West confirms the game force with the 3 Diamond call. A popular treatment in Two over One is to take the game force off with a rebid of the same minor at the three level. This treatment allows a partnership to get out at three of a minor if the responder is just invitational and opener is minimum.In this case however, West wants to be sure to force to game so the 3 Diamond bid achieves the game force and allows East to further describe their hand. West does not necessarily have Diamonds.
When East rebids Hearts, the fit is found and West decides to explore for slam. The 6 Diamond response is the standard (if slightly old-school) reply that shows one Key card and a void in Diamonds. Using this method, 5 NT would show 2 keycards with a useful void somewhere (partner can ask, if interested), and six of a suit below the agreed suit shows the void in the suit bid with 1 Key card. A jump to 6 of the agreed suit would show 1 key card with a higher ranking void. (See chart below.)
The hand is now said to be a “30 point” one (the 10 points in Diamonds are out of play) and since West has 17 of these 30 points, East should have at least 12 of the remaining 13 for the opening bid. (Surprise!) The only thing West should be sure of before bidding the grand is that there are 13 tricks.There should be 5 Hearts, five Spades or 4 with a ruff and at least 2Clubs. East should have the Queen of Clubs for the opening bid, but if not, there could be a ruffing finesse on the Diamond Ace. All's well that ends well as the Queen of Clubs is onside and doubleton.
Bidding 7 NT on this hand is very shaky, as it requires the Spades breaking 3/3, a less than 50% chance and a non Diamond lead!! If you do not bid a grand slam, 6 NoTrump is a good alternative.
Play Commentary:
It turns out there is not much to it, but to guard against the 4/2 Spade break, Cash the Ace of Hearts, then the Spade Ace, King and ruff with the Heart Jack. Pull the rest of the trumps and make 7 when clubs work.
Responses to 4 NT Showing a Void.
5 NT 2 Key Cards with an unspecified void then, 6 clubs
asks where the void is, unless the agreed trump suit is Clubs.
The Void suit is bid next if it can be done lower than 6 of the
agreed; otherwise, bid 6 of the agreed suit, implying that the void
suit is a higher one.
6C 1 Key Card with a void in Clubs
6D 1 Key Card with a void in Diamonds
6H 1 Key Card with a void in Hearts (only if Spades is the agreed suit); OR
6H 1 Key Card with a void in Spades, if Hearts is the agreed suit.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Tom Clark |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 13 from Friday morning…February 10
Recommended Bidding…
North East South West
Pass 1C Pass 1D
Pass 1H Pass 1S*
Pass 1NT Pass 2NT*
Pass 3NT Pass Pass
Pass
Lessons in hands do not always have to be exotic. Squeezes, fancy conventions, etc. are great talking points for post-mortem discussion after a game. But, straightforward hands are more often than not the meat of a player’s game. Consider the hand shown…
· East makes a routine opening bid of 1C
· West must choose between 1D and 1S as a response. The length and quality of the diamond suit weigh in favor of a 1D bid…plus, spades can possibly be shown later…depending on the progression of bidding.
· East makes a normal 1H rebid…the texture of the heart suit is compelling and offsets any alternate/early thought of rebidding 1NT to show a balanced hand.
· It is now West’s turn to bid. 1S is a clear choice (notice the asterisk in the recommended bidding). If your game is in its early development or perhaps intermediate stage…you might want to consider the thought process to follow that many players have as an agreement. The bid of 1S at this point is fourth suit. Many advanced players agree that 4thsuit is forcing to game…with one exception…the one this bidding sequence has taken…1C-1D-1H-1S. The agreed exception for this one auction is 1S is only a one round force (unlimited hand by responder/advancer…enough to force the bidding one more time by opener…and, promises a four-card spade suit). To distinguish between 4th suit forcing one round as previously stated and 4thsuit forcing to game, many advanced players jump to 2S to show this difference…the auction would be 1C-1D-1H-2S (unlimited hand by responder/advancer…enough to force the bidding to game…and, depending on agreement may or may not promise a four-card spade suit…all my partners agree this sequence denies a four-card spade suit because 1S would be forcing and responder/advancer knows he/she is going to game…the difference-benefit of the two forcing bids is opener knows when partner does/does not have a 4-card spade suit). The particular hand shown above…repeating, after the intermediary discussion, 1S is a clear choice/bid.
· East makes a standard 1NT rebid…an opening hand with a maximum of 14 HCP’s.
· The second asterisk shown in the recommended bidding is for a distinction bid. West bids 2NT which invites East to bid a 3NT game with a maximum, 14 HCP’s. In theory, it takes 25 points to make most NT games.Therefore, the raise to 2NT shows 11 HCP’s for the invite…looking for 14+11=25.In practice, there are exceptions to the 11 HCP invitation. This is one of the exceptions. The diamond suit of West is a source-of-tricks suit for NT and adds value to the 10 HCP’s that West actually holds. A raise to 2NT should be made by West, accordingly…inviting East to bid game.
· East, holding the maximum, should bid 3NT as requested by partner.
The discussion of the recommended bidding is complete. For your imagination, consider what would happen if South chooses to enter the bidding with a 1S overcall…4-card sound-suit. Straightforward has now turned to competitive bidding. It is much harder for East/West to get to the cold 3NT contract!
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Monday Evening, 1/30/2012, Hand # 10
This hand has several points of bidding interest. East, while having a 7 loser hand with a good heart suit, would have been better suited to open 2  rather than 1  (especially vulnerable). East only has 10 high card points and limited possibilities for defensive tricks. However, many would consider East too strong for 2  and also open 1  .
West, thinking there might even be slam possibilities, bid a Jacoby 2NT. Now North, with a good two suit hand and only a 5 loser count, came in with 3  . East bid 4  and South, encouraged by good spade cards and an outside K  , bid 4  . West, no longer quite sure who can make what on this clearly highly distributional hand, bid 5  and North bid 5  .
East, possibly now regretting his opening bid and afraid partner might go on to slam if he passed, doubled 5  . East was thinking his Q of spades and A  might take tricks and partner had shown an opening hand with his 2NT Jacoby bid.
After a lead of the A  , North ruffed and decided the doubler, who also opened the bidding, probably had the Q  . So North led to dummies 9  which held. The K  was cashed and North next played two top clubs and ruffed a club - there was no point in trying a club finesse since it would be impossible to handle a Q fourth holding in West's hand after cashing the K  . Fortunately, the clubs came down and another heart ruff put North on lead to draw the last trump. 5  doubled making!
Note that an opening lead of the J  gives the defense the best chance to defeat the contract, North has to duck in dummy. If he covers, West plays the A and Q and a third diamond and North has no way to make 5  . If declarer does not cover the J  lead, West can overtake, then play the A  and another  . But North now ruffs high, leads the 10  and finesses and repeats the finesse with dummies J  . The K  pulls East's last trump and there are 3 good diamonds in dummy to pitch club losers on and make 5  .
Key Points:
A hand such as East held is better suited to a weak 2 bid. An added benefit to that opening for this hand is that North would probably not have played East for the Q  after a weak 2 opening.
North has such a good playing hand that he should bid at the first opportunity, even at the 3 or 4 level and even vulnerable.
When South hears his vulnerable partner bid at the 3 (or 4) level, his hand, with 3 good spades, becomes worth a bid.
When in doubt, it is generally right to "bid 1 more" on clearly distributional hands. North is not sure who can make what or that his A, AK, will all cash.
Finally, it is very dangerous to double on highly distributional hands where possibly both sides can make high level bids.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board 8 from January 24th
The bidding was 1N – P – 2C – P – 2D – P – P – 2H – 3D – All pass.
The bidding is interesting in that my partner chose to bid Stayman planning on passing any response I made. The hand rates to play better in any of the three suits rather than in NT unless the 1N opener has lots of and good clubs. On this hand, she found gold when I had 5 diamonds.
The defense went 3 rounds of hearts, the third ruffed with the 8 of diamonds. Making 3 diamonds is easy losing two hearts and two spades. Do you see any way to make 4? As the cards lie, there is no legitimate way to make 4 but there is an interesting trap that, if North is not 100% alert, might catch him. Cash the A of diamonds, go to the K of clubs, draw the last trump with the K of diamonds, now cash (the trap) the A of spades. Play A of clubs, club ruff, and play a spade off dummy. If North has retained his K of spades, then he is end played and has to concede a ruff and a sluff. Do you see how North might have avoided the trap? If he dumps his K of spades under your A, then he cannot be endplayed since South has all the rest of the high spades and will be able to cash two spades when you lead a spade. Note that if North had the KQ tight of spades, there would have been no way to avoid the end play. Note also that if North had the Qx of spades, South would have had to jump up with his king from KJT when a spade is led from dummy in order to keep North from being endplayed.
Lessons:
1. When partner opens 1NT and you are unbalanced, it often is better to play in a suit. When you have a singleton club and at least 43 in the Majors with 4 or 5 diamonds, an easy way to get to a suit is to bid Stayman and pass any response (including 2D).
2. When a hand looks routine, look a little closer and see if there is a play that might, under the right circumstances, yield an extra trick.
3. The particular situation described in this HOTW is not uncommon. Particularly in part scores, you often find yourself staring at a similar card combination as the one depicted in this hand. Axx opposite xxxx or Jxxx or other similar combinations can sometimes yield another trick. Remember that when there are 6 cards out, the odds favor a 4-2 break so if there are lots of honors missing, then sometimes the doubleton cannot escape or may be caught unawares and not realize the need to get rid of a high card to avoid an endplay.
4. When planning an endplay like this one, it is often good to cash the A of the suit in question early so that the defense doesn’t yet know what is happening.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Louis Sachar |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday afternoon, January 18th: Hand # 24
Look at the bidding shown and replace the "?" with a double - what would it mean?
p - 1h - p - 1nt
p - 2c - p - 2h
p - p - X?
We've all gotten so used to low-level balancing doubles, that it is difficult to recognize penalty doubles. I was East in the above auction, and in fact I did not double, because I was afraid partner would interpret it as take-out, and I didn't want to hear three diamonds. (He told me later that in fact, he would have thought it was take-out.)
If I was in his seat, I would not have recognized it as a penalty double either, had I not had this very auction recently explained to me by Tobi Sokolow, winner of multiple national and world championships.
As she had explained to me just one week earlier, If I had wanted to make a take-out double, I could have done so after the one-heart opener, or after the rebid of 2c. The fact that I didn't, means that the double now has to be penalty.
Remember, the reason we make balancing doubles is on the assumption that if the opponents have an eight-card fit, then most of the time we will have an eight-card fit too. In this auction the opponents haven't shown a fit. You can reasonably expect that opener has five hearts, and responder has two. So there is no reason to assume that your side has a fit either.
You can disagree that a penalty double was right on this hand. What would I do if the opponents now ran to diamonds? Maybe some of you would have bid earlier. That is all debatable. As it was, east-west could make four spades on this particular hand. Still, +300 would have been a good result. +100 was not.
The point here is that a double in this situation is not take-out, it is not cooperative, but 100% penalty. (It's always good to remember that just because partner passed, doesn't mean he has a weak hand.)
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand # 6, Tuesday Morning 1/10/2012 Opening lead the 6
Most people play a range of 15 to 18 for a 1NT overcall and West, with 16 points and excellent spades, is happy to make that bid. East uses Stayman, despite having no 4 card major, because they are playing that a direct bid of 2NT would be a transfer to diamonds. West carries on to 3NT and tells the defenders that East is not promising a 4 card major on this auction.
So now you are in 3NT and you know possibly all the missing highcards are on your right. You win the K  with your A  and start planning how to take 9 tricks. Off the top you now have 7 tricks. Chances for an 8th and 9th trick come with the 10  (if the defense leads more spades) and possibly the Q  or the K  or the 4th diamond. But, from the bidding, it is likely both the K  and the A  are badly placed.
You want to save the A  for a sure entry to dummy i8n case you can set up dummy's 4th diamond, so you start by playing diamond, letting the 10 ride to East's J  . East leads the J  bringing your winner count up to 8. You try another diamond hoping East has the AJ doubleton. East wins the Q  and plays a third spade. Now, you cannot play another diamond to set up the fourth diamond in dummy or even try a heart to the Q because East will get in with the A  and run spades (even if the K  is in the West hand). So it is time to cash your clubs and see what happens.
Assume East pitches 2 spades and 1 heart on the last three clubs. You have lost two tricks and you know East has a good spade and the A  left. If West has the K  the situation is hopeless - you will always lose the K  , the A  and the remaining spade. But, what if East has the K  ? Then, his remaining 4 cards are most likely to be:  7,  Kx and  A. Play a diamond and, after East wins and cashes her last spade, play low on East's heart lead and win the last two tricks! East has been endplayed.
At my table I was West. My partner could see the endplay coming and, insteading of discarding 2 spades and a heart, discarded 1 spade and the 9 and J of hearts in tempo. Declarer, still trying for an endplay, led a diamond and was down 1. Declarer should have counted East's hand and realized East had only 1 heart left and dropped the singleton K  and made an overtrick with the 10  . But, East's good play of pitching down to the singleton K  (without a long pause), gave declarer a chance to go wrong.
Lessons: Visualize the opponents hands based on the bidding and plan early where you can manufacture the tricks you need. When down to only a few cards left, look for possible endplays based on what you know about where the remaining high cards are likely to be. On defense, do what you can to throw off declarer and avoid being endplayed.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This hand is from the Sectional: Friday morning, January 6, hand # 14.
The auction shown is one of the many ways North-South could arrive at a 4  contract. Alternatively, South might choose to open his marginal 12 point hand, despite it also having an 8 loser count. However it was bid, almost every time this hand was played the contract arrived at was 4  .
Put yourself in North's place as dummy comes down and the Q  is led. You have 27 high card points between the two hands and all the top spade cards. Looks pretty good. But about 1/3 of the declarers in 4  went down! What did they do wrong and what can we learn from this?
When we first learn to play bridge we are taught it is usually correct to pull the opponents trumps if we have all the control cards in the trump suit and no immediate ruffs to take. However, if declarer starts out by playing at least two rounds of trump, he will only come to 9 tricks. Count your winners before playing to trick 2. Off the top, or possible to set up, you have 4 spade tricks, 1 heart trick, 1 diamond and 2 clubs. That only adds up to 8 so you have to manufacture 2 more tricks and they can only come from ruffing losers. If you play three rounds of trumps you will only get one extra trump trick by ruffing something, leaving you a trick short. Even if you play only 2 rounds of trumps, when West wins the A  he will lead a third round of spades - again holding you to just 9 tricks.
The road to success is to make sure you get all your winners cashed and also ruff two cards in either your hand or dummy. At trick two lead the K  . West wins and leads a trump, say. Win in hand, cash the Q  and play to the A  . Ruff a heart and lead to the K  and ruff one more heart high. Now cash your A  and give up a diamond and a club - making 4  .
This line of play works for any opening lead or later leads by the defence. Declarer just has to make sure he gets two ruffs in one of his hands.
Lesson: Count your tricks in the planning stage and make sure you preserve enough trumps to get all the tricks you need from them. Often this means you can not pull trumps early in the hand, even if you have all the controls.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Tom Clark |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to Rosemary Kelley for recommending this hand to me…Board 9, Wednesday night, December 28.
Suggested bidding as shown above.
The positive…examining hand records certainly is helpful in understanding/developing various aspects of bridge. The negative…computer analysis, its double dummy vision of seeing all four hands, often times is blind to human/common-sense. Consider the pictured hand…
The suggested bidding is straightforward. North has a sound 1 opener and South (whether standard or 2/1, two over one) should respond 1NT. West has value enough to compete with 2 Spades and both North and South have hands that re-evaluate to bidding a game in hearts.
West wins the opening spade lead and pauses to digest the dummy and bidding. Seemingly, unless East has a key card(s) in clubs and/or diamonds (thereby north drastically overbidding), the contract, if it is to be beaten, will have to come from four tricks in hearts and spades combined. In this thought, West should lead a low heart at trick two to cut down on spade ruffs by declarer. Why low???
· East, from the bidding, is known to have at most…one heart card. In case this (possible one) card is an honor, leading the Ace at trick two would crash the two defensive cards.
· If North has the missing heart honors (KQJ), leading the Ace at trick two would automatically sacrifice the 10 in West’s hand. Worse, based on the bidding, declarer would take the remaining tricks as the club suit is likely to be established for spade discards. This is not the case if West still holds the trump Ace.
· Yes, you are correct in your analysis that leading a low heart to North’s likely heart winner will still allow a spade to be ruffed. But, the goal here is two heart winners and two spade winners in order to beat the contract. Protecting the 10 is essential.
Computer savvy will quickly make the hand when west leads the low heart by inserting the 8 taking the known finesse for the 10 (remember the computer can see all four hands). But, human sense by North will likely play an honor at this point. Declarer, unsuspecting of the bad trump break, will either ruff a spade and then drive out the Ace or simply just drive out the Ace without ruffing a spade as her spade spots will produce one winner at this point. Assuming North plays this way (common sense)…she will go down one**…losing two spades and two hearts. Try it and see.
Remember, bridge is approximately 25% declarer play, 25% dummy play and 50% defensive play. Everyone enjoys declaring hands. But, defense is a central component in the game for more growth and better results.
*Forcing
**Card distribution and dummy entries are insufficient for North to trap the 10 for a quasi-like Coup En Passant end position (a Coup En Passant is the lead of a plain suit card…non-trump suit card…to promote a low trump card behind a higher trump card to a winning position. This designation/name is taken from the game of chess. In bridge it has a second name. It is the simplest type of a situation called an elopement as coined by Geza Ottlik in a series of BridgeWorld articles).
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Jack Lacy |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit Christmas party 12/10/2011, morning session board 18.
The suggested auction is 1D (E) – 1H (S) – P (W) – 2D (N) – 3D (E) – 4H (S) – all pass. The 2D cue bid by East is a game invitational (or better) hand in support of hearts.
The bidding is interesting because South has an easy game bid as soon as he knows his partner has heart support and an invitational (at least) hand. Even though South has only 12 HCPs (and 2 of them look to be of questionable value), he should bid game because of his 7 card suit. Another way to look at it is to use "Loser count." South has a 6 loser count and should accept an invitation to bid game.
The opening lead is the seven of diamonds. Before playing even one card from the dummy, stop and make a plan. Counting losers, you have 2 spade losers, 2 club losers, and a possible diamond loser. One possible line could be to win the diamond ace, thereby eliminating your diamond loser and try to set up a club trick for one of your spade losers. The problem with this line is that the defense has an easy shift to a spade (where else is the defense going to get tricks?) after winning the first club, thereby thwarting your plan and you will end up down 1 losing two clubs and two spades.
Let’s think about the hand differently. This time we will count winners. You have 7 heart winners, 1 spade winner, and 1 diamond winner which adds to only 9. Where can you generate another winner? Let’s change the hand slightly so you can see what needs to be done. If the dummy’s diamonds were the KQ9 rather than the AQ9, you would lose a diamond but in the process gain two diamond winners and none of us would even bat an eye. Why not treat the AQ9 the same way and give up a diamond trick (which seems to be unnecessarily adding to your loser count) and now you can count 2 diamond winners instead of 1, getting you to 10, exactly what you need. What you are doing is trading a diamond loser to get rid of two black suit losers (probably spades). OK. Now we have a workable plan.
Play low on the diamond lead. Win the return as soon as you can and draw trumps. You take 7 heart tricks, 1 spade trick, and 2 diamond tricks adding to 10.
Lessons:
1. A seven card suit is much stronger than the HCPs in the hand would suggest. As soon as it is supported, it is usually worth 6 or 7 tricks.
2. Pausing before playing even one card from dummy is very important. Had you won the A of diamonds before you made your plan, you would have gone down.
3. Counting winners is also important particularly when your loser count is too high and you can’t see how to reduce it.
4. It pays to give up what looks like an unnecessary trick when it generates two tricks in return.
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| |
|
|
|
|
 W
e
s
t |
North |
 E
a
s
t |
|
| South |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hand # 24 From Monday Night, 12/12/2011
In a small Monday night game, half the field got to 6  , probably with an auction as shown. My style is to "pay off to the pre-empt" and not bid a slam without being able to adequately explore just because the opponents have taken away my room. But I can understand North's frustration at having to guess whether to bid on and her belief that with a hoped for A lead a slam would make.
But no East was kind enough to lead the A  - probably all chose to lead a singleton spade and no North made 6  .
However, the hand record had a surprise in it: The computer analysis said that North could make 6  ! How is this possible with the cards distributed as shown? And, is it a reasonable line of play that a careful North might actually find?
Let's put ourselves in North's place and plan the play of the hand after the spade lead. North knows there are 13 tricks off the top if spades split and trump are no worse than 4 -1. But, after the opening lead, it is just wishful thinking to expect spades to split. On this auction, East is almost certainly leading a singleton.
Can the hand be made after a singleton spade lead? That would make East most likely either 6 - 3 - 3 - 1 or 6 -4 - 2 - 1, assuming trumps split 3 - 2. If East has only two trumps, than North can play the A  and K  and then play on spades, ruffing the fourth round and returning to dummy with a trump to the J  to cash two more spades. That would produce 12 tricks. What about ruffing 2 clubs in dummy as a line of play? North has to discard that approach as there would be no way back to hand to pull trump after the second ruff. So, many declarers would play for East to have only 2 trumps and go down when trying to cash the spades after pulling only two rounds of tunmps.
How can you make the hand against a 6-3-3-1 distribution in East's hand? Note that this pattern is actually more likely than a 6-4-2-1 pattern with exactly 2 trumps. Declarer should play for this distribution if there is a way to make the hand. After winning the spade lead, declarer plays a club to the ace and ruffs a club. Then she cashes the A  and overtakes the J  and finishes pulling trumps. At this point, declarer knows East was indeed 6-3-3-1 and the stage is set for a beautiful ending. Cash the K  and the next to last trump and the cards will look as follows:
 8
 6
 K2
 6
 J75  -
 -  -
 9  AQJ105
 Q  -
 KQ109
 -
 8
 -
Look what happens to West when you play your last trump and pitch dummy's diamond. He can't throw a spade or the Q  without giving declarer the contract so he has to pitch his last diamond. Now, declarer leads the 6  and West wins and must lead away from the  J75 around into dummy's  KQ10! 6  making on a strip-squeeze end-play!
Nice, but can a non-expert declarer really find this at the table? It all depends on how well you learn to visualize and make appropriate deductions. If you knew for certain that East had 6-3-3-1 distribution and you were told there is a way to make the hand, then you would eventually figure out how. The trick is to go through the same analysis process without that information and then pick the line of play that leads to a make against the most likely opponent card distributions.
One final note added for completeness: Does anything change if East has a 7 card diamond suit jump overcall instead of 6 cards? Then, he is probably 1-2-7-3 or 1-3-7-2, with suits in usual order. In either case, the strip-squeeze endplay described above will still work. Also, if East is 1-2-6-4 and drawing only 2 trumps and playing on spades would have been the winning play, West will still have to be alert and throw away his Q  on the last trump lead to avoid the endplay
|
 |
|
|
| Compliments of Pam LaShelle |
|
|
| Compliments of Paul Tobias |
| | | | | |