|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, October 22nd, 2016 |
|
Defense is so very important in bridge that, for the second week in a row, you have a defense problem. See how you rate with this problem
West, your partner, leads the ♣Jack, which Declarer wins in Dummy with the Ace. Declarer then leads the ♦King, which holds. He next leads a small ♦ to his Ten. This trick is won by West who now plays the ♠9, covered by Dummy's Ten. How do you defend to defeat this contract?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, October 15th, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, October 8th, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, October 1, 2016 |
|
North's initial double was a Negative Double, as was the second, indicating that he had maximum, i.e. 10 or more HCPs, for his first Double. Against 3NT West led the ♥Queen. When an enquiry was made East indicated that the lead could be from KQT, and East was to drop the Jack if he had it.
You, the Declarer, let West win this trick and he switches to the ♠9. Without seeing all four hands there is no guaranteed way of making this contract, but what line of play are you going to take? No pressure here at all, but you are playing in the Teams Trials to select the next national team. You make the winning decisions you are representing your country. If you don't make your contract...... there is always next year!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another hand from a local duplicate game. Not the least interesting aspect of this hand is the bidding. At one table N/S decided that over a natural NT opening they would use Gerber, including Keycard Gerber. Would you and your favorite partner use 4NT in the auction on this hand, or would you use Gerber?
West led the ♠Ace followed by the King. Declarer ruffed in Dummy, with East following with a small ♠. You are Declarer. How do you proceed to give yourself the best chance of making this Slam?
|
|
My apologies for the late appearance of the answer to the problem.
If West plays the ♠ King at Trick Two it is for one of two reasons - either West commenced with a 7 card ♠ suit OR West has no trumps and is trying to force Declarer. The latter is the more likely, because with a seven card ♠ suit headed by the AK West may well have decided to bid that suit over the 2NT opening. Trumping the ♠ King with the ♥2 Declarer should play a small ♣ to the King and Queen. Noting that East's play had suggested a 3 card ♠ suit Declarer should now play the Queen of that suit, breathing a sigh of relief when East follows suit, Now Declarer should lead the ♦ Ace and a small ♦ to Dummy. Playing the two top cards of that suit in Dummy. Declarer should now play the ♣ Ace. East is forced to ruff with South over-ruffing. Declarer should now play his remaining ♠ to Dummy, ruffing with the Jack, with East having to under-ruff. The ♥ Ten will again have East under-ruffing. Poor East with a five card trump suit does not take a trick in that suit! Well played Declarer.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, September 17th, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, 10th September, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, September 3rd, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, August 27th, 2016 |
|
This hand was written up, about eleven years ago, by Philip Alder, who, after many years as a bridge columnist with the New York Times, is now a regular contributor to the ACBL Bulletin.
In this spirited auction West led the ♥ King, won by Declarer. A ♠ was led to Dummy's Ten. Lucille Le Sueur, sitting East could either win this trick or duck it and win the continuation. However our intrepid East won this trick and.... Three questions for you 1. what card should she play when she wins the trump trick, 2. why should she play that particular card, and 3. under what name is Lucille more well-known?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, August 20th, 2016 |
|
These hands were played in an inter-city match between Helsinki and Stockholm many years ago. An explanation of the very strange bidding is clearly required!! South's 2♥ response showed an Ace and a King, and his 3♥ rebid was intended to be a transfer bid. North forgot their bidding system and jumped immediately to 7♥. West led a small ♠. If you are sitting South you should first of all not look dismayed and then plan to take as many tricks as you can! Good luck.
|
|
This hand was taken from "Bridge Analysis" by Boris Shapiro, published in 1976. This, in my view, is a book well worth reading for serious students of bridge!
It is important for Declarer to look confident when they see Dummy - although that may be difficult on this hand. If you do not look confident you have already given assistance and encouragement to the defenders!!
With a ♠ lead Declarer took the first 8 tricks - two in the ♠ suit, three in the ♣ suit, two in the ♦ suit and a ♦ ruff. At that stage West had a four card ♥ suit and one card in the ♦ suit. When Declarer led a ♠ West had to ruff with the 9 to stop the ♥ 7 winning in Dummy. Declarer over-ruffed with Dummy's King. This gave him 9 tricks. Declarer now made the last 4 tricks with a cross-ruff.
While Declarer made this Grand Slam with a 3/3 fit, life would have been much more difficult if West had decided to lead a trump. However if a trump had been led I am confident that the hand would not have appeared in Shapiro's book. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, August 13th, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, August 6th, 2016 |
|
Some 11 or 12 years ago Bobby Wolff wrote up this interesting hand which had been played in a duplicate tournament. As Wolff noted, the hand produced a variety of results with only a few, who played very well, making the Slam. West led the ♠King, and continued with the ♠Ace. You are the Declarer, sitting South, who now is tasked with making the contract. What is your Plan? By the way West has a ♥ void.
|
|
Wolff reported a number of different approaches that Declarers took in their attempt to make their contract. Drawing trumps and taking the ♣ finesse did not work. Neither did drawing trumps, cashing the ♣ Ace and King, and taking the ♦ finesse, when West covered the Queen thus blocking the suit.
Some declarers made the slam by ruffing the second ♠ and immediately taking the ♦ finesse BEFORE drawing trumps. They were then able to discard their losing ♣ on Dummy's winning ♦ .
Wolff considered that this was not the optimum approach. He considered that the best play was to cash only two trumps - the Queen and the Jack, before playing the ♣ King and Ace. Declarer could then take the ♦ finesse and it did not matter whether West played the King in an attempt to block the suit. Declarer still had the trump King as the entry to enable him to discard his losing ♣ on Dummy's winning ♦ . Would you have found that play? |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, July 30th, 2016 |
|
Just as defenders, particular the defender who has to make the opening lead, need to analyze the bidding, it is also important for Declarer to analyze that lead and any bidding that may have been done by the opponents. On this hand North's 2♦ bid was a Michaels Cue bid, usually, in this sequence, showing 5/5 in the major suits. West leads the ♦ Queen, which East wins with his Ace, East next plays the ♥2, Declarer covering with the Queen and, when West plays the King, wins with the Ace in Dummy.
How should Declarer continue?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, July 23rd, 2016 |
|
How do you and your favorite partner deal with your right hand opponent making a pre-emptive opening bid of 4♣, 4♦, 4♥, or 4♠? If you have not discussed it it is time you did!! Most experienced players tend to treat an immediate Double of any of the first three bids as being for Takeout. The Double of a 4♠ opening bid is a little more vague. While many players prefer that Double to be penalty-oriented there also many players whose experience indicates that they may not get a good score in defending 4♠X. Obviously a topic for discussion!
While on this hand N/S are playing the Double for Takeout, South has not got the ideal hand for his Double, but he hoped that North would bid his major suit OR that he left the Double in for penalties. Of course North took neither of those actions but his 4NT bid asked South to choose a minor suit. 5♣ then became the final contract with West leading the ♥7. East played the ♥9 and Declarer won the trick with his Ace. Declarer then plays the ♣ Ace on which East drops the Queen. How should Declarer continue to give himself the best chance of making this contract?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, July 16th, 2016 |
|
North has certainly bid rather aggressively on this hand - 3 bids on his 7HCPs! West leads ♥7 with the Ten being played from Dummy. How should East/West play to attempt to defeat this contract. This problem was one presented by Mike Lawrence about 12 or 13 years ago. In his write-up of this problem he notes that South's 2NT bid shows about 18 points.
Bridge is indeed a 'thinking' game and the Defenders will have to cooperate very well to defeat this contract! Put yourself in East's seat and work out how you are going to defeat the 3NT contract.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, July 9th, 2016 |
|
When you can see some possible difficulties in making your contract it can sometimes help to try to visualize the distributions of the missing cards you would like to see to enable you to make the contract. On the lead of the ♠2 what is your plan to make this contract? How many tricks can you see at present? Have you any reasonable grounds for making some assumptions about some of the missing cards?
Your Assistance is Requested.
I have been putting out the Weekly Bridge Problem (WBP) for about 5 years. It is very much easier for me since I have been putting the question on the Website of the Beverly Hills Bridge Club. However ...... I do not know how many people look at the WBP.
If you look at it on a fairly regular basis and would like it to continue, please drop me an email and let me know.
Brian Richardon. Email: brideljd@gmail.com
|
|
My apologies for incorrectly showing North as the Dealer - it was indeed South who made the opening bid.
If you, as Declarer, make the assumption that you have 8 tricks IF the missing cards in the ♦ suit break 3/2, and the ♠ suit breaks 4/3, then this contract should not be too difficult to make. Winning the opening ♠ lead, Declarer should immediately play a ♥ to Dummy. East will no doubt win that trick and return a ♠. South should win that trick and play the ♦ KQ8, overtaking the 8 with Dummy's Ace. He should then play the ♥Jack, which will be won by West who can cash his two ♠ tricks. However Declarer can now make his contract by playing his ♦4 to Dummy's 6, which will enable him to play his established ♥ Winner.
As only one person has responded to my request to let me know if you want the WBP to continue, I will, over the rest of July, decide whether I want to continue to put in the effort of producing this on a weekly basis. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, July 2nd, 2016 |
|
Listening to, and understanding, the bidding is an essential part of playing 'good' bridge. So it is in this hand.
West's 2♦ opening bid shows a 6 card suit with 6-10 high card points. West leads the ♦Queen and East discards the ♠2, with South winning the lead with his King. Declarer can see 8 tricks and the ♥ suit would provide the ninth trick IF the ♥ Ace is in East's hand. The wise Declarer however will first see if there is another way of generating that elusive ninth trick! Our Declarer decided to try to gain an extra trick in the ♣suit. He led a ♠ to Dummy and played a ♣ , intending to play the 9 if East played low. However East played the Ten and Declarer had to play the Ace. He then led a second ♣ towards Dummy, intending to play low from Dummy if West played the Queen. Unfortunately for that Plan West discarded a small ♦. How should Declarer continue?
|
|
What should Declarer do now when West does not follow to the second ♣? If he chooses to play a ♥ he has not been paying attention to the bidding nor has he been following the play of the hand up to this moment. He should know that West commenced with 6 cards in the major suits. Declarer should play the remainder of the ♠ suit. When he does that he will discover that West commenced with a 2-4-6-1 distribution. So far Declarer has taken 7 tricks - 4 in the ♠ suit, one in the ♦ suit and 2 in the ♣ suit. If he now plays a small ♦ from each hand West is now on lead and has either to lead a ♦ into South's KT, or exit with a ♥ to give Declarer his ninth trick.
While not all players will agree with West's opening bid of 2♦ when he has ♥AJxx in his hand, South's play as Declarer enables him to avoid having to play the ♥ suit!
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, June 25, 2016 |
|
|
|
|
What bid would you make with South's hand if your favorite partner had overcalled 1NT when West opened with a bid of 1♥? Would you transfer, or would you jump immediately to the 4♠ game?
West leads the ♥King. What is your PLAN to give yourself the best chance of making the contract?
|
|
Would you and your favorite partner transfer when North overcalls 1NT, or would you bid the ♠ game yourself? Personally I would NOT transfer in this situation. Why? Partner's hand is pretty well-known after he has overcalled 1NT and I have a couple of minor suit holdings in which I would prefer the lead to come up to me rather than through me!
So we are now faced with the problem of making this contract with West's lead of the ♥ King. It looks as if we have a ♣ Loser and possibly 3 ♦ Losers. It does look as if the only reasonable way of making this contract is by endplaying West in the ♥ suit. This will take some careful planning! Declarer should duck the opening lead and win the ♥ continuation, discarding a small ♣ from hand. Declarer should next play two rounds of trumps, and then the ♣ King and Ace before ruffing a third ♣ in his own hand. His next play should be a small trump to Dummy's King, followed by exiting with the ♥ Ten, on which he discards the losing ♦ 6. Poor West is now endplayed. He has to either lead a ♦ or give Declarer a ruff and a discard.
A Loser-on-Loser play coupled with an endplay are techniques that should be in every bridge players' tool-kit! |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly bridge problem, June 11th, 2016. |
|
Maybe South was being a little adventurous in jumping to 2NT, but duplicate bridge often rewards such bidding!
How should he plan to make his contract with the lead of the ♥6?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem. June 4th, 2016 |
|
I am putting this hand on my laptop as we are 'steaming' eastwards from Cochin (India) to Penang (Malaysia). It is 5.15 pm on Saturday afternoon and I have a glass of wine in my hand and a magnificient view over the top of my computer. I am sitting in the lounge on Deck 5 of our large ship looking at the wide expanse of sea. I would even enjoy this without the wine.
When you pick up a hand like South did here AND you are first in hand it can always be a matter of some concern about what you should pre-empt OR indeed should you pre-empt at all? Too late to worry about that now, you decided to make an opening bid of 5 ♣ . Everybody passed and West made the opening lead of the ♦King. How do you plan to make your contract if (a) East plays low on the opening lead, OR (b) East overtakes the King with the Ace?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem. May 28th, 2016. |
|
After a day of century + temperatures in Muscat, it was indeed a pleasure to get back into the air-conditioning on board ship. Next stop is Cochin, India, in three days.
Now to this week's problem. The opponents' preemptive bids can often keep you out of your preferred contract, or propel you into a higher contract than you would otherwise not have bid! Of course the opponents ' bidding might help you to make the contract.
Try your declarer skill on this hand when West has led the ♣ King and East has followed with the 2.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, May 21st 2016 |
|
When I first started playing bridge it was considered relatively normal for players NOT to open 2NT if they had a suit with no 'stopper'. That practice has certainly disappeared and now a great many bridge players have no problem with opening South's hand 2NT.
Against a 4♠ contract West leads the ♣Ace followed by the King, with East playing the 2 and the 9, using standard signals. West now switches to the ♥King, which you win. You, South, next play the ♠Ace, with West playing the Queen and East the 9. You are playing Matchpoint pairs so overtricks are important. How do you proceed?
|
|
Taking 10 tricks in this contract is not really difficult, but playing Pairs you should really be trying to take MORE than 10 tricks. However unless you plan very carefully there could be problems. Looking at his own hand Declarer should come to the conclusion that it may well be possible to establish a third ♦ Winner in his hand on which he could discard a losing ♥ from Dummy. A word (or two) of warning...if you are going to establish a long suit you need to be sure that you can access that long suit ONCE you have the additional Winner established.
When Declarer plays his ♠ Ace he must be careful to NOT play the 2 from Dummy. He can play the 8, 7, 6, 5 or 4 BUT NOT THE 2. He should next play the ♦ Ace and King, before ruffing the 3 with the trump Jack. West still has a fourth ♦ so Declarer should now play the ♠ 8 to his King, enabling him to ruff another ♦ with Dummy's highest trump. The carefully preserved ♠2 can now be overtaken by the 3 in Declarer's hand so that Dummy's losing ♥ can be discarded on the winning ♦9 in Declarer's hand. 11 tricks taken will be the result and a better than average score will be collected.
Next week's Bridge Problem will be sent from the "Ovation of the Seas" leaving Muscat and heading East across the Indian Ocean towards Cochin, India. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, May 14th 2016 |
|
Some players may not feel happy about bidding 2♠ with North's hand. Personally I have no such qualms. North's hand, after-all, does have pretty good trump support. South does not have a great hand, point-wise, but his shape would strongly suggest a jump to game.
West makes the opening lead of the ♣Ace, followed by the King, which you (Declarer) ruff in your own hand. You now lead a small ♠, which West wins with the Ace. West continues with a second trump on which East discards the ♣9.
Having lost two tricks your task is now to make your contract when you have two more potential Losers - one in each of the red suits. What is your Plan?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, May 7, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, April 30, 2016 |
|
A common bidding issue comes up in an auction like the following. With E/W being silent throughout what does 1♠ when the bidding has gone 1♣ - 1♦, 1♥ - 1♠? How do you and your favorite partner play this? Does the 1♠ bid show a suit? Is the bid forcing? If it is forcing is it a one round force or is it game forcing? Ron Klinger, a well known Australian international player, author and teacher suggests what he calls a "sensible approach". His approach is, that in the auction mentioned, the 1♠ bid shows a suit and is forcing for one round. Conversely an auction of 1♣ - 1♦, 1♥ - 2♠ DENIES a ♠ suit and is game-forcing! Such was the auction in today's problem. Over North's 2♠ re-bid, South rebids 3♦ and North jumps to 6♣, asking South to choose between 6♣ and 6♦.
6♣ is the final contract with West leading the ♥Jack, covered by Dummy's Queen, and won by East's Ace. East returns a small ♥. What is your PLAN to take 12 tricks?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, April 23, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, April 16, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, April 9, 2016 |
|
Experienced bridge players take into account the inferences that occur often in bidding and playing. These inferences can be drawn both from what the opponents bid or played OR from what they did not bid or play. For instance, if West had bid the ♠ suit during the auction and then makes an opening lead of say the ♦Jack, you can often/usually infer that he does not have both the Ace and the King of the suit he bid.
In this hand West led the ♥4 and East played the Queen. You are South, the Declarer. What is your Plan to make this contract?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, April 2 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, March 26, 2016 |
|
East's vulnerable 4♦ bid must surely show a long ♦ suit. This is confirmed by West's lead of the ♦King and East's overtaking it with the Ace and returning the Queen. You, as Declarer, win the second ♦ with the ♥5. What is your PLAN to make this contract?
|
|
It does look as though you have only 3 Losers, one in each of the suits - other than trumps. However as you are almost certain that East commenced with an 8-card ♦ suit, and you commenced with two 5 card suits, it is unlikely that the other suits will break kindly for you! When you start playing trumps, say the Ace and small from Dummy to your Ten, East discards a ♦ on your second trump. Now West has as many trumps as you have. It does not make any sense to draw all of West's trumps and the try the ♣ finesse - it is highly likely that the ♣King is in East's hands. If you take that approach you will probably lose count of the number of ♦ tricks that East will take! No, you will have to try to set up the ♣ suit BEFORE you draw all of the trumps. So play the ♣Ten and let it run. East will do best by not winning the King. If that occurs Declarer should play a second ♣. As there were initially only 5 ♣ cards missing it is important to play the Ace now and then play a third ♣. Declarer can then win whatever suit is returned and will make his contract - losing one ♠, one ♦, and one ♣ . If indeed East, when he wins the ♣King, plays a third ♦ Declarer can throw away his ♠ Loser, ruff in Dummy with the trump Queen and claim 11 tricks! |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, March 19, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, March 12, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, March 5, 2016 |
|
This is one of Eddie Kantar's hands. Whether it is a hand from play, or one that he made up for teaching purposes, I do not know. If it is the latter it is interesting because Eddie (in his book Roman Keycard Blackwood) favors 1430! West leads the ♠Queen and East plays the 4.
What is your PLAN to take all 13 tricks?
|
|
Declarer has 12 top tricks and the question is "from where is the 13th trick coming?" If West has led from something like QJTx he will have to guard the ♠ suit when the ♦ suit is run. In addition if East, as seems likely, has four or more ♥ cards he will have to guard that suit. So who is going to guard the ♣ suit?
Declarer should win the opening lead in his hand with the Ace and run five ♦ tricks, discarding a ♠ and a ♥ from his hand. He should then play the ♠King, and the ♥Ace and King, ending up in Dummy. Dummy now has four cards left - one in each suit. East has had to find 4 discards on the run of the ♦ suit, almost certainly one ♥ , one ♠ , and 2 ♣ s. When he has followed suit to the ♠ King and the ♥ Ace and King, East has a top ♥ and ♣Qxx left in his hand. Declarer has a ♥ and the ♣AK2. West's final four cards are a high ♠ and the ♣Jxx. When the 13th ♦ is played from Dummy both East and West are faced with a problem for which there is no solution. If East discards a ♥ then Declarer discards a ♣. If East discards a ♣ then Declarer discards a ♥ . West has a similar problem - If he discards a ♣ then the ♣ 2 becomes the 13th trick! If West discards a ♠ then the 9 in Dummy becomes the 13th trick.
In relation to last week's question. The two experienced IMP players I consulted had two different views - one would try to make the contract via a minor suit finesse - standing the risk of a -200 score, while the other would settle for a -100 score in both Pairs and Teams. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, February 27th, 2016 |
|
In this problem you are faced with some competitive bidding with both pairs vulnerable. West leads the ♠Ace and King and then switches to the ♥Ten, East following with the 3. How do you plan to play this hand?
NB If your partner over-bids you need to make sure that YOU do not under-play!!!
|
|
One of the important matters for Declarer to be aware of is that it looks as though, once he sees Dummy, that E/W can probably take at least at least 9, if not 10 tricks in a ♠ contract. That being so Declarer has to be very careful not to go down two. -200 will never be a good score if the opponents do not bid on to game. South therefore needs to plan carefully. He has already lost two tricks. If he decides to take the two-way ♣ finesse, and it loses, then N/S will lose a total of 6 tricks and the dreaded result of -200 will be the result.
As a contract of 3♥ by South is a great contract Declarer needs to minimize his possible losses. A score of -100 would be a great result. This can be achieved by Declarer drawing trumps and then playing a ♦ . The defenders can take their three ♦ tricks but then have no choice other than to play a ♣ or give Declarer a ruff and a discard of a ♣ from his hand. That is clearly the approach that Declarer should take in a Matchpoint game. In a Teams match the situation is not quite so clear. However a losing ♣ finesse and a score of -200 is unlikely to be beneficial to the team! Personally I would almost certainly settle for -100 at IMPs scoring also. However I will canvass the opinions of a number of higher level IMPs players, and let you know next week what the majority view was.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, February 20, 2016 |
|
When you are playing in a Duplicate Pairs games, overtricks are very important, but making your contract is even more important! This was the issue that Declarer faced in this week's problem. He received the lead of the ♠5, played low from Dummy and, when the Jack was played from East, he won the trick with the King. [Playing the King in this situation conceals the location of the Queen.] I hope that you, the Declarer in this hand, would have played the King! Having won the opening lead what is your Plan to make your contract?
|
|
To make this contract Declarer needs only 3 ♣ tricks, NOT four! IF Declarer decides that he should get an overtrick by taking four tricks in the ♣ suit, and decides to lead twice to the high ♣s in Dummy, he is almost certainly going to be defeated. Striving for an overtrick, which could mean the contract is defeated, is not usually a good PLAN!
To guard against a bad ♣ break Declarer should, at Trick Two, play either the ♣7, from his hand, or lead the 2 from his hand and insert the 8 from Dummy when West plays low. This enables East to win with a low ♣ and return his remaining ♠ to West. Declarer wins that trick and plays his remaining ♣ to Dummy's King, Queen or Jack. Declarer will now end up taking 9 tricks, even if East switches to a ♥ after winning his second ♣ . If East decides to switch to a ♥ after winning the first ♣ then Declarer is almost certainly going to be defeated. If Declarer wins the opening ♠ lead with the King in his hand, a ♥ switch at Trick Three is more difficult to find. Why? East may well believe that his partner's opening ♠ lead was from a suit headed by the Ace, or Queen, or both!
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, February 13, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem,February 6, 2016 |
|
|
|
| weekly Bridge Problem, January 30th, 2016 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, January 23, 2016 |
|
How many of you would bid 3♥ on North's hand? Eric Kokish and Beverly Kraft, two of Canada's most respected bridge experts, advocate a jump to 4♥ , - a bid designed to put pressure on the opponents. [How many North players are protesting "But I have VERY few points!"]
On the actual auction you, South, bid on to 4♥ and West leads the ♣Ace.
Plan your play to make your contract.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, January 16th, 2016 |
|
The bidding can often give you a good idea about how to play the contract. So it was with this hand, which surely displayed some aggressive bidding. While a contract of 5♥ doubled would almost certainly have been defeated it is not really surprising that South, with little defense, decided to bid on to 5♠. When West bid on to 6♥, North then bid on to 6♠, reasoning that his partner probably has a ♥ void.
West leads the ♥ Ace, on which East plays the King. How do you plan to make this Slam? If the trump King is a singleton then making your contract would be quite easy.... But what if it is not a singleton?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, January 9, 2016 |
|
A spirited bidding sequence has you, South, the Declarer in a contract of 6♦. West leads the ♣Ace, followed by the King which you ruff in Dummy with a small trump. You now play the ♦Ace, followed by the King - on which West discards a ♣. [Surely you did not expect me to give you a problem where the trump suit was distributed nicely!!.] What is your Plan to win the remaining eleven tricks?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem January 2, 2016 |
|
North's 4NT bid was quantitative (South's 3NT re-bid was 23+) and South accepted the invitation. 6NT was the final contract and West led the ♠King. What is your Plan to give yourself the best chance of making this Slam contract?
|
|
When, as South, you receive the lead of the ♠King and consider your Plan, you should see that you have 11 tricks - one ♠ , 3 ♥s, 3 ♦s and 4 ♣s. The only possibility of getting an additional trick has to be in the ♦ suit. However you do not yet have enough information about the defenders' hands to work out how to play the ♦ suit.
As you must lose a ♠ it is a good idea to duck the opening lead, so that when you get a second lead of that suit you will start finding out more information about defenders' hands. East follows suit on the opening lead and on the second ♠ he discards a small ♥ . So we now know that West started with a 5 card ♠ suit. Next you can cash 4 ♣ tricks and 3 ♥ tricks. West followed to the 3 ♥ tricks and 3 of the 4 ♣ tricks, discarding a ♠ on the fourth ♣ . From our counting exercise we now have established that West commenced with 5 ♠s, at least 3 ♥s and exactly 3 ♣s. West can therefore have a maximum of 2 ♦s. All Declarer has to do now is to play the ♦Ace and a small ♦ to the King in Dummy. The lead from Dummy of the ♦8, through East's J9 to South's QT, brings in 12 tricks for Declarer. One of the important keys in Declarer play on this hand was the ducking of the opening lead to begin the task of getting a count on West's hand. Of course once you have a count on West's hand you automatically have a count on east's hand. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, December 26th 2015 |
|
For those of you have already looked at this question I regret that I had presented the contract as being 3NT - and even I could make that contract with a couple of overtricks. I should have listed the contract as 6NT - that is the challenge for you!
The third, and last, of our squeeze hands - well it will be the last for at least a little while! This is also our last problem of the year. I hope you have enjoyed and been challenged by at least some of them.
A simple bidding sequence has you, South, the Declarer in a contract of 6NT with West leading the ♠Queen. You win that in Dummy and lead the ♥6, covered by East's Ten. You let East hold that trick and he returns a ♠ to West's 9, which you win in Dummy.
Well you have two of the twelve tricks you need. Plan the play to make your contract. Think squeeze!!
|
|
Would you have believed me, when I put this hand up a couple of days ago, if I had said "Isn't Dummy's ♠ suit a powerful holding?" I guess the answer is that you would probably NOT have believed me!
OK let us look at the two hands. You had to lose a ♥ and now you have done that at Trick Two. It looks as if there is now no problem if the missing ♦ cards break 3/3. However that is against the odds. Having won Trick Three with a high ♠ in Dummy Declarer should play a ♥ to his Ace and then take 4 ♣ tricks. After the first 8 tricks have been played these are the cards that West has: ♠J, ♦J985, while Dummy has: ♠2, ♦AQ42. East has: ♥ K74, ♦ T7, While Declarer (South) has: ♥5, ♦K63, ♣T. Just look at the dilemna that West faces when Declarer plays the ♣T. If West discards the ♠J then Dummy's 2 will make a trick, with Declarer discarding a ♦ from Dummy. If West discards a ♦ then Declarer discards the ♠2 from Dummy and takes four tricks in that suit to make his contract, discarding his losing ♥ on Dummy's winning ♦. Notice that Declarer has not played any of the ♦ suit until he has finished playing the ♣ suit. So if by some chance the squeeze is not working Declarer can still fall back on trying for 4 tricks in the ♦ suit. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem December 19th, 2015 |
|
You, South, are the Declarer in a 4♠ contract, and East has overcalled 2♥. This bidding sequence may not appeal to everybody - but you have to deal with the problem with which you are presented! Neither partnership are playing 2/1.
West leads the ♥8 and East wins the first two tricks, West showing a doubleton. When East plays a third ♥ Declarer, ruffs with the ♠9, with West discarding the ♣5. You, as Declarer, draw the opponent's trumps in three rounds.
It does look as though you have only 9 tricks so what is your Plan to give yourself the best chance of taking 10 tricks?
|
|
Declarer's chances of making this contract initially seem to depend upon the missing ♦ cards dividing 3/3, or the ♣ Queen being doubleton. The more experienced Declarer, however, may see another possibility - a squeeze on West. That is certainly possible IF West commenced with four ♦ cards and the ♣Queen.
Declarer has to lose a ♦ anyway, so he should play a little ♦ from both hands after he has played 3 rounds of trumps. East wins this trick with the Queen or Jack. At this stage West has 6 cards left ♦ T98 and ♣ QT9. Dummy has ♦AK4 and ♣J63, while Declarer has ♠Ten, ♦75 and ♣AK7. East who has just won a ♦ trick and now has to lead from ♥ T9, ♦ J and ♣ 842. The squeeze is now all set up. No matter what card East plays Declarer will win, either in Dummy or in his hand. The ♠Ten in Declarer's hand becomes the very important squeeze card which forces West to discard either a ♦ or a ♣ , enabling Declarer to take three tricks in one of those suits.
To understand the mechanics of this type of squeeze you may find it easier to follow if you actually deal out the four hands. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, December 12th 2015 |
|
You, sitting South, have made an opening bid of 1♣ and, after an uncontested auction, find yourself in a contract of 6NT. West leads the ♦Queen with everybody following to the first trick. Plan your play.
Difficulty rating for this contract? No more than 2.5 out of 5. Get warmed up with the play needed to make this contract. The next two weeks will have similar problems - but at a higher level of difficulty!
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, December 5th, 2015 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem. November 28th, 2015 |
|
South is in the balancing position after the bidding sequence of 1♥ - Pass - 2♥ - Pass, Pass -?. He KNOWS his partner has some points and he, South, does not feel as though he has much defense against a 2♥ contract. So he makes the bid of 2♠ .Not every player would make this bid and South is not certain that E/W will be able to make their contract. Given that situation South needs to make every effort not to go down in the 2♠ contract.
West makes the opening lead of the ♥Ten. East wins with the Ace and plays the ♠ Ace and another ♠ . West wins the King and returns the Jack to Dummy's Queen.
You, South have lost three of the first four tricks. How should you continue to get the best return for your balancing bid?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, November 21st, 2015 |
|
North's cue-bid of 2♠ shows a Limit Raise (or better) in partner's bid suit. South decides to jump straight to the 4♥ game. West leads his top ♠ and, upon viewing Dummy, switches to a small ♥ .
You are playing in a Teams' Match, and your team and that of your opponents are playing in the final. Going in to this last Board the two teams are tied. You do not officially know that the opposing team have played in this same 4♥ contract. Don't tell anyone that I told you that they did not make the contract. If you, South, can bring this contract home you are the WINNERS. No pressure on you is there?
Plan, and execute, your play to take 10 tricks!
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, November 14th, 2015 |
|
Time for some thinking about defense this week. When West leads the ♦Ten, you, East, see some chance of defeating this slam contract. After all you have a likely ♠ trick and your ♦King is well situated to take a trick.
Declarer wins the opening lead with the ♦Ace from Dummy. He then plays the ♠Ace and King, with your partner playing the Queen on the first trump lead. Declarer next plays the top three ♥ cards from Dummy, following suit twice and discarding the ♦ Queen on the third ♥ . When Declarer now plays the fourth ♥ it is decision time for you. Your play please. Remember you need two tricks to defeat this slam contract
|
|
One of the skills that ALL top players develop is that of Counting. For Declarer, the ability to work out the distribution of the opponents' hands, even when they have not bid, gives him a greater chance to make his contract, or make one or more over-tricks. For Defenders the ability to work out Declarer's actual distribution can enable them to work out the best defensive Plan. This hand is a good example of the effectiveness of COUNTING.
After Declarer has won the opening lead and played the ♠ Ace and King you, East, know that South commenced with a seven-card trump suit. Therefore he has only 6 cards in the other three suits. When Declarer plays the top three ♥ cards, discarding the ♦ Queen on the third ♥ winner, you KNOW that South's hand had the distribution of 7-2-2-2. So when Declarer plays the ♥ Ten you CANNOT afford to ruff. By now you know that Declarer's last 5 cards are all trumps. You, East, should simply keep on discarding your ♦ suit. Declarer will ultimately be forced to ruff and will then have to lead a ♠ from his holding of T875. You will now take two trump tricks to defeat the Slam. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, November 7th, 2015 |
|
Yet another Declarer play hand for you this week. West has led the ♥ King.
How do you plan to take 11 tricks in this contract?
|
|
This hand has generated quite an amount of discussion, with more than one respondent being concerned that West might have commenced with a seven-card ♥ suit. I guess that is possible but perhaps West might have made a jump bid in the ♥ suit, if that was the case.
It should be noted that the 5♣ contract cannot be made if West finds the best possible defense! The reality is that if Declarer wins the opening lead his chances of making this contract have been significantly diminished. Declarer should play the 7 from his hand on the opening lead, after East has played the 8. It is highly likely that West will interpret partner's 8 as an encouraging card and continue with a second high ♥ . Declarer should win the trick with the Ace and ruff his last ♥ . Trumps should now be drawn. Declarer will now be aware East has no ♥ cards or ♣ cards left in his hand. When Declarer now plays a ♦ from his hand and plays either the Ten or Jack from Dummy, poor East is end-played. He has only ♠ and ♦ cards left and has to lead around to Dummy, enabling South to make his contract.
How can this contract be defeated? If West, having won the opening lead, plays a ♦ at Trick Two, East can avoid the endplay by leading a trump once he has won a ♦ . |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem. October 31st, 2015 |
|
A Declarer play hand problem for you this week.
West finds an opening lead of the ♣Jack to South's 3NT contract. (Declarer might well wonder why a major suit lead was not forthcoming from West!) Declarer plays a small ♣ from Dummy and East plays the ♣8. As Declarer what is your PLAN to make your contract?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem. October 24th. |
|
Yet another defensive problem for you this week.
The North/South pair are playing 'strong twos' and therefore the opening bid is an 8 playing trick hand in Spades. After North's jump to game South tries his luck at the Slam.
Your partner, West leads the ♥ Queen and continues with the Jack which is trumped by Declarer. Declarer then runs all of his trumps with West discarding a ♥ on the first trump. You have to find five discards.
Remember that bridge is a partnership game and defense is the true test of a partnership!
|
|
East has nothing in his hand that will enable him to win a trick. He KNOWS that if the contract is to be defeated the setting trick must come from his partner. If there is another defensive trick available East has to discard in such a manner that West will know which five cards to keep when Declarer has finished playing all of his trumps.
If the partnership are playing standard signals (high card showing an interest in that suit) then East should start discarding the 2, 3, 4 and 5 in one of the minor suits - it does not matter which one. East should then discard the 2 in the other minor suit. His partner should now come to the conclusion that East has NO MORE CARDS in the first minor suit he discarded. If East had discarded four ♣ cards then West knows that Declarer commenced with three cards in that suit. If East first discarded his four ♦ cards then West, who has four cards in that suit himself knows that Declarer commenced with only two ♦ cards.
If East/West are playing upside down signals then East would discard one of the minor suits in the order of 5, 4, 3 and 2.
This hand was taken from a book written in 1972 by Victor Mollo. That book has a very meaningful title "Test your Defense. Where the Points Are Won."
That title simply underscores the importance of defense! |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem October 17th. |
|
Time again for us to consider defense. Try your skill with this problem.
With South opening a 12-14 1NT and North raising to 3NT, you, West, have to chose an opening lead.Your choice is the ♥Jack. East plays the King and South wins with the Ace.
At Trick Two South plays the ♣Ten. What is your Plan to attempt to defeat this contract?
|
|
What could the lead of the ♣Ten be about and should West rise with the Ace or not? Is it possible that South is a clever Declarer who knows that if he can "steal" a ♣ trick, while he still has a ♥ Winner, he will have time to drive out the ♦ Ace and claim 9 tricks - 3 ♠s, 2 ♥s, 3 ♦s and one ♣? Indeed this is what the clever Declarer was doing and his deception involved leading the ♣Ten from QJTx.
Were there any clues available to West that could encourage him to immediately win the ♣Ace and continue with a second ♥? YES! If Declarer commenced with ♥AQx it would make a great deal of sense for him to 'duck' the opening lead! The fact that he did not take that course of action strongly suggests he started with a doubleton AQ. If West wins the ♣ lead and returns a ♥ then Declarer will be defeated because East can/will return a ♥ when he wins the ♦Ace. If East does not have the ♦Ace then this contract cannot be defeated - BUT Declarer cannot have the ♦Ace along with ♠QT7, ♥AQ, ♣QJT2. Why? He would have 15 points!!
A tough hand for the Defenders but this is the sort of defense that wins champioships!! |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem October 10th |
|
In the United States Monday, October 12 is Columbus Day. History records that, among other things, Christopher Columbus was a 'great discoverer'. In the current problem East needs to DISCOVER how to defeat this contract.
West leads the ♦King, followed by the ♦6, Which is won by East's ♦Ace. How should East continue in order to defeat the 4♠ contract?
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, October 3, 2015 |
|
Before dealing with this week's problem - an apology for missing out the Double in the bidding on last week's problem. North had indeed Doubled West's 2♥ bid. This Double was NOT a Support Double - if it had been a Support Double (showing a 3 card ♠ suit) I would have informed you and then there would have been no bidding issue - South would have bid 3♠. My apologies for that omission. I can well understand many of you re-bidding the good ♠ suit if North had not Doubled.
Now on to this week's problem. For some strange reason North chose not to re-bid his 6 card ♠ suit and you are playing the contract in 3NT with West leading the ♦ Queen. Plan your play, making SURE you take at least 9 tricks!
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, September 26th 2015 |
|
South/s first decision is that of making his mind up about what to do over North's Double. As far as North is concerned that Double is for penalties! Your partner KNOWS that you have at least a five card suit and you have made an overcall - so your hand is limited in high card points. My view is that you should PASS.
OK, assuming you have passed, North leads the ♠ 9, with both East and West following to the first two top cards in that suit. How do you plan to continue to maximize your return?
|
|
When you first saw this hand I had put a ? mark, instead of a bid, for South's re-bid. This was done deliberately so that you would pause for thought BEFORE you made a call. Perhaps some of you wanted to at least think about whether you should make another bid. Pass was indeed the correct call to make.
Now for the correct defense! This hand was one written up by Mike Lawrence a few years ago. His suggested play is for South to win 2 ♠ tricks and then exit with the ♦9. North should win 2 ♦ tricks and then give South a ♦ ruff. So far it is 5 tricks for the defense. Now when South exits with a top ♠ Declarer is in more trouble. In addition to the tricks the defense have taken already they should win 3 ♥ tricks and one ♣ trick. Declarer ends up taking 4 tricks. In other words North/South took nine tricks!
This was indeed a brutal hand for Declarer. If South had ever been tempted to re-bid his strong ♠ suit, instead of passing partner's Double, the result should make him really glad he did not yield to the temptation! |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem Saturday September 19th, 2015 |
|
One of the pioneers of contract bridge (which is now 90 years ‘old’) was Ely Culbertson. The problem you are faced with today is adapted from one of Culbertson’s newspaper columns published in 1942. Test your skill at making this contract.
East/West are Vulnerable and East is the opening bidder.
West led the ♥ Queen and here are the North/South hands.
Whether you were playing in 1942 or you are playing in 2015 the importance of making a PLAN cannot be emphasized enough. MAKE YOUR PLAN!!
|
|
There are two important matters to consider with this hand – 1. Declarer has a ♣ Loser and 2 possible ♣ Losers, and 2. Does one of the Defenders present particular problems if they are on lead?
Here are all four hands:
The astute Declarer will recognize that (a) the only real possibility of making this contract is by developing Dummy’s long ♣ suit on which to discard ♠ Losers from his hand, and (b) West is the danger hand and must be kept off lead so that he cannot lead a ♠ through Dummy’s K7.
OK now that you have recognized the two above factors – what is your PLAN? The critical issue in developing Dummy’s ♣ suit is to keep West off lead! At Trick One Declarer should play the ♥King from Dummy and, when East plays the Ace, DISCARD the ♣7 from his hand. Declarer should then win the ♣Ace and play a small ♦ to Dummy, ruffing a ♣ high in his own hand, before returning to Dummy with a trump and ruffing a third ♣ high. As the missing ♣s are 3/3 Declarer has two winning ♣s in Dummy on which he can discard two ♠s, conceding one ♠ to the Defenders.
This Plan depends upon the 6 outstanding ♣ cards breaking 3/3. If that does not occur then Declarer is unlikely to make this contract.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem September 12, 2015 |
|
Sometimes you are very disappointed when you end up in a game contract and you feel that you really should be in a Slam.
Consider the following bidding sequence.
West leads the ♠King and these are the hands of Dummy and Declarer:
There is no point in concentrating on the fact that 6♥ looks like a fine contract and you are playing in GAME! Forget the past – concentrate on the present. West has continued with a second high ♠. Plan your PLAY. Take 12 tricks if you can, but make sure that you take at least 10!!
|
|
While this looks to be a fairly easy problem BE CAREFUL. If the trump suit breaks 4/2 AND the Jack is in the hand with the long trumps you need to take precautions to ensure that you can access Dummy’s long ♣ suit. The probability of the ♥ suit breaking 4/2 is 48%, and that is the break the Jack has 4 chances of being in the long hand and only 2 chances of being in the short hand. If you have got this far in your thinking you should be glad that you are not in Slam.
With the probability of a trump Loser and a ♠ Loser Declarer needs to plan carefully. It would be a real shame to go down in a game when you wanted to be in a Slam. This hand now becomes an exercise in control of the trump suit. When West continues with a second high ♠ Declarer should discard a ♦ and then ruff the third ♠. Now that Declarer has created a void in both hands he should concede a trump trick by playing the ♥Ten. If the ♥Jack does not appear Declarer should draw trumps and claim 11 tricks. If the ♥Jack wins the trick no play by defenders can stop Declarer from taking ten tricks.
If Declarer had decided to play the ♥AKQ, nine tricks (at best) would be the result. While partner hopefully does not show his disappointment he may well be unhappy.
To quote Eddie Kantar: “One of the secrets of trump control is to give up an early trump trick when both you and dummy are void in the force suit”. In this hand the ♠ suit was the force suit.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, September 5, 2015 |
|
There are times when the opening bidder is not really proud of his hand and hopes, either conscioulsy or sub-consciously that the bidding will not get too high. So it was with this hand. South bids the ♠ game BUT North is not willing to stop there and the final contract becomes 6♠ . West leads the ♦ King, and now it is up to you to take the 12 tricks necessary to make this Slam.
Good luck in your efforts.
A hint - as often happens some knowledge of probability can be very useful!
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem August 29th. |
|
This hand was played in the 1998 World Championships. In the Semi-Finals of the Open Teams all 4 teams played in a 4♠ contract. In the Finals of the Women's Teams one team played in 4♠ and the other team (YOUR TEAM) played in 6♠. You are Declarer in the Finals of the Women's Teams and are playing in a 6♠ contract. You have received the lead of the ♥ 8. What is your Plan to make this contract and WIN THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP? I hope that does not put too much pressure on you!!
|
|
First a few words of explanation..... The North/South hands that were actually played in the 1998 World championsips were altered by the author of the book from which I took the hand. The ♥ suit was slightly changed. In the Championships the South hand had ♥ Q62 and the North hand had ♥ AK7. The author gave South ♥ A62 and North ♥ KQ7. This slight change made absolutely no difference to the play or the bidding. In the Championships the North/South pair played a 10-12 point 1NT. The author, in his wisdom, decided it would look better to his readers who were more used to a 12-14 NT opening. I believe the 5♥ response should have been 5♠ , but I am only guessing!
Now to the play. This is certainly not a great slam to bid - but it will indeed be a great result if South can manage to bring it home. As Declarer, what chances can you see? If the missing trumps are not 3/2 then whatever slim chance Declarer had has now become even slimmer! Let us then assume that the trumps are 3/2. There is really no possibility that you can both set up the ♦ suit and then actually access the winning ♦ because you have only two entries outside the ♦ suit. So how should you proceed? Win the opening ♥ lead in Dummy and play three rounds of trumps, relaxing ever so slightly when the suit breaks 3/2, with West discarding a small ♣ on the third trump. Declarer should then play the ♦ Ace, followed by a ♦ ruff, with East and West following both times.
What next? Declarer knows that West had only 2 trumps, and had at least 2 cards in the ♦ suit. Perhaps he should also wonder about the opening lead of the ♥ 8. It looks to be from a short suit - singleton, doubleton or perhaps tripleton! In addition Declarer cannot see either the ♣ King or ♣ Queen. This COULD suggest that West does not have both of those cards. The ♣ suit looks to be about the only possibility of making this hand - but Declarer should not attack it yet. He should play a top ♥ . West discards another ♣ . So now we know that East commenced with a 6 card ♥ suit and a 3 card ♠ suit. When Declarer now ruffs a third ♦ East follows to that suit also. So Declarer now knows that East is either void or has a singleton in the ♣ suit. The only chance that Declarer has is that East indeed does have a singleton ♣ AND it is either the King or Queen! Indeed that is the situation, exposed by Declarer's play of the ♣ Ace. Now by leading a ♣ from her own hand Declarer loses but one trick to make her Slam.
A well-played hand. It is important ot note the process of discovery that Declarer embarked upon to give herself the best chance of making this contract! |
|
|
|
|
| Weeky Bridge Problem. August 22nd 2015. |
|
This is an interesting hand which came up in a Club game a few days ago. West is the Dealer and East/West are vulnerable.
Two questions for you.
1. How will you bid this hand? If you open the bidding 1♦ North will overcall 1♥ and your partner will Pass. South will probably bid 2 ♥ .
2. If the final contract is in the ♣ suit how do you take 12 tricks on the ♥ Ace lead?
|
|
With only 18 High Card Points many West players will open this hand 1♦ . North will almost certainly overcall 1♥ and East will Pass. South will either respond 1♠ or 2♥. [However some West players may choose to open their 18HCP hand 2♣, on the basis that it is a hand that has only 3 Losers IF there is either a ♣ or a ♦ fit with partner. There is no doubt that, if West's two suits were major, rather than minor, suits then a 2♣ opening bid would be the bid of choice for many more West players.] In a 1♦ - 1♥ - Pass - 1♠ /2♥ sequence, West has to be careful to now make a bid that adequately describes his hand! Certainly a re-bid of 3♣ does not do justice to his hand. A re-bid of 4♣ is slightly better, but in my view 5♣ is an even better bid. If West does indeed re-bid 5♣ will/should East bid on to the Slam? Again,in my view, he should bid on to 6♣ . Why? He has 4 card support for partner, he has an 8 Loser hand AND he knows that West has a ♥ void!
Bidding on to the Slam is more difficult than making it! Provided the missing ♦s are split 4/3 Declarer should be successful. Ruffing the opening ♥ lead in his own hand he should immediately ruff a small ♦ in Dummy. Returning to hand with a second ♥ ruff he should ruff a second ♦ in Dummy. Now coming back to his hand with the ♠Ace he should ruff a third ♦ in Dummy, before playing Dummy's last trump, overtaking that in his own hand and drawing the remaining trumps. Playing his three winning ♦s, Declarer can then concede the 13th trick, a small ♠ , to the opponents. |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem August 15th |
|
It is satisfying to reach a Slam when the opponents have opened with a weak two bid - BUT ONLY IF YOU TAKE AT LEAST 12 TRICKS.
How would you plan to give yourself the best chance to make this Slam when West leads the ♥ King, and East follows with the 4?
|
|
This hand was adapted from a hand in a very interesting book "15 Winning cardplay techniques" by David Bird and Tim Bourke. I believe that Bourke produced the hands and Bird wrote the analysis.
Bird advocates the following line of play. Win the ♥ lead and play a ♦ to the Ace. Play a trump to the 8 in Dummy and ruff a ♦ high in your hand. Bird considers that there is better than average chance for West to have commenced with the ♦Kx, because of him having a six card ♥ suit, headed by the King. He then recommends that, if the ♦ King has not dropped, then Declarer should return to dummy with a Trump to the Ten. and play a ruffing finesse, playing East for the missing King. He claims that East has a greater chance of having ♦ Kxx or Kxxx, than West has of having Kxx. This makes sense when you recognize that West has only 7 spaces for the ♠, ♦ and ♣ suits, while East has ten spaces for those same 3 suits.
The issue for all of us to understand is that this is the type of analysis we need to undertake when we are playing!!
, |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem. August 8, 2015 |
|
This hand was taken from a book entitled “Odd Tricks” which was published in 1934. The hands
in this interesting book were all hands actually played in competition, usually involving the
Author, Travis White.
With South the Opening Bidder what do you think the opening bid should be?
|
|
South, looked at his hand, counted the points and decided to open 4♣. I cannot imagine many of today’s partnerships pre-empting with this type of hand. South was not really expecting his partner to bid. West passed and then South, to his dismay, realized that he had made an opening bid of 4♦ NOT 4♣. Under the rules that applied at that time a bid made could not be changed once LHO had made a call. Not surprisingly North raised his partner’s pre-empt to 5♦. The Author, who was sitting East wrote that “South…. was a retired army officer, calm by training and temperament and never giving away his hand by look or gesture”. South was indeed going to need all of his stoicism as the bidding continued! South had to get the contract back to his real suit so he now bid 6♣. I would have thought that North would have realized that South had meant to bid 4♣ to start with. However North did not think in this fashion and now bid 6♦!! Yes South now bid 7♣ and North again bid the ♦ suit. Now South is playing in a 7♦ contract!
West made the lead of a high ♥ and - well you can see what happened then. Declarer ruffed with his ♦2, played the Queen and another ♦ and, with the missing ♦s being 3/3, wrapped up his Grand Slam with one ♥ ruff, 4 ♦ tricks and 8 ♣ tricks.
To rub salt into East/West’s wounds a ♥ lead is the ONLY lead which permits the contract to be made AND there is no play for 7♣!
Not a real candidate for a Weekly Bridge Problem but I must say it amused me to read about it in the 1934 book which was re-printed in 1978.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem. August 1st, 2015 |
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem, July 25th, 2015 |
|
South opened a 15-17 1NT, with North bidding immediately to game. West, your partner, leads the ♥ 6, the 7 being played from Dummy, the King from your hand and Declarer contributing the 4. You return the ♥ 2, telling your partner that you started with an even number of ♥ cards. {If you do NOT give your partner 'count' when you are returning the suit he led - it is indeed time you did!} On this second trick Declarer plays the ♥ Jack and West wins the Queen. West now returns the ♥ Ace. How do you PLAN to defeat this contract?
|
|
It is important to remember that to defeat this contract the defense has to take at least 5 tricks. The opponents have, between them, 26-28 HCPs. It certainly does not look as if you and your partner have sufficient points, outside of what you have already seen, to generate a 5th trick! Did you, East, ask yourself why Declarer played the ♥ Jack when you returned the 2 AND the 9 was sitting in Dummy? If you did ask that question then I do indeed hope that you quickly came to the conclusion that both Declarer and Dummy commenced with 2 cards in the ♥ suit.
Having reached that conclusion you would of course know that your partner commenced with a five card ♥ suit, and you thefore need to play the Ten under West's Ace so that defense can now take five tricks to defeat the contract. Failure to play the Ten on the 3rd ♥ will have East/West taking only 4 tricks!
Bridge is indeed a thinking game - but this problem should not really have presented you with too difficult a challenge! |
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem July 18th, 2015 |
|
North's 2♣ bid tells partner that he has a Limit Raise in the ♥ suit (10-12 Dummy Points, with at least 3 card support). This is the Drury convention, used when partner makes an opening bid in a major suit in 3rd or 4th position. North can barely make the 10 Dummy Points, nevertheless South fearlessly jumps to the ♥ game.
West makes the lead of the ♠ 3. Declarer plays low from Dummy and East plays the Jack. What is your plan to take at least ten tricks in this contract?.
|
|
|
|
|
| Weekly Bridge Problem July 11th, 2015 |
|
This hand came up some years ago and South's jump to 3♠ was a common approach at that time. It was a FORCING raise and committed the partnership to reaching game - at least.South apparently took a dim view of his hand and closed the auction with a bid of 4♠. West led the ♠ 5 and East followed with the ♠ 9. Imagine you are South and the result of your play will show South to be not optimistic enough, or just right! How do you plan to play this hand?
|
|
This hand should not create too many problems for Declarer - if he plays carefully AND passively. He should win the opening ♠ lead in Dummy and immediately play the ♣ King, ruffing it in his own hand, returning to Dummy with a trump so that he can ruff Dummy's last ♣. Declarer should now lead a low ♥ from his hand. This will be won by East who has little choice other than to return a second ♥. Declarer should play low on this card. If East retains the lead and returned a third ♥ Declarer should cover that card and his fourth ♥ would now be a Winner, thus avoiding a ♦ finesse. However as East does not have a third ♥ his choices are limited - he has to give Declarer a ruff and a discard, by playing a ♣, or, by playing a ♦, do the finessing for Declarer in that suit.
If West overtakes the second ♥ from East his options are also limited. He can play his winning ♥, giving Declarer a trick in that suit so that he does not have to guess the ♦ finesse, or giving him a ruff and a discard by playing a ♣, or playing a ♦, doing the finessing for Declarer in that suit.
This was indeed a hand where careful and passive play worked best for Declarer!! |
|
|
|
|
| Bridge Problem. 4th July, 2015 |
|
Having jumped to the ♠ game you should not disappoint your partner by not making it!
West led the ♦ 6, and you, the Declarer, call for a small ♦ from Dummy. East ruffs and returns a small ♠. What is your PLAN to make this contract?
|
|
|
|
|
| BRIDGE PROBLEM JUNE 27TH, 2015 |
|
|
|
| BRIDGE PROBLEM June 20, 2015 |
|
Bridge can be a very competitive game, with everybody striving for the best possible result – for money if you are a rubber bridge player, for Match-points if you are a Duplicate Bridge player and for IMPs if you are playing Teams. Of course no matter what form of bridge we are playing we ALL would like to get the best possible result.
In the the above bidding sequence North/South persevered and found their way through to the Slam, despite some interference from West. West’s 3♦ bid was simply a pre-emptive bid. North’s 4♦ bid (also showing a strong ♠ suit) and South’s 4♥ bid were both control showing bids.
West led the ♦King and the hands of Dummy and Declarer appear above.
Declarer was not entirely happy to see a 5 card ♦ suit in North’s hand as it was now likely that East was void! After Declarer plays the ace from Dummy East indeed ruffed with the ♠4 and returned a small ♥.
.
How should Declarer continue to give himself the best chance of making this Slam?
|
|
Declarer has lost the only trick he can afford to lose - if he wishes to make his contract.
He knows (or at least he should know) that this contract will depend upon finding out which of the Defenders has the ♠King and whether it is singleton or doubleton! The astute Declarer will delay deciding how to play trumps until he knows more about the distribution of the missing cards. At this stage he knows that West commenced with a 7-card ♦ suit and at least one ♥ , and East has a ♦ void and at least one ♥.
The recommended way of playing the contract is for Declarer to play a second high ♥, discarding Dummy's ♣ Ace, if West does not ruff. If West ruffs then Declarer over-ruffs, draws the remaining trump and claims. If West has not ruffed then Declarer, at Trick Four, plays his 3rd high ♥, discarding Dummy's last ♣ if West does not ruff. Declarer can now play the three high ♣ cards from his hand. When West discards a ♦ on the 3rd ♣ Declarer KNOWS that West commenced with a hand shape of 2-2-7-2. It is now a simple matter of finessing West for the trump King.
It was counting that enabled Declarer to make this contract. Counting is a skill that ALL bridge players need to develop AND use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|