|
|
|
|
|
|
Invitational or Forcing? |
|
This example is from our Bidding Revision Workshop on Tuesday 11th November. What would you bid next sitting North? What kind of bid is 3H in this bidding sequence? Is it an 'invitational bid' or is it a 'forcing bid'?
|
|
The bid of 3H by South is a 'Forcing Bid'. It shows a hand with 13-18 points and 5 hearts. North must choose a game to bid (either 4H or 3NT) depending how many cards he holds in the heart suit. In this example he has three cards in the heart suit so should bid 4H. Holding only two cards in the heart suit he would have bid 3NT.
Note if playing Transfers the bidding would have been as follows............1NT, Pass, 2D, Pass, 2H, Pass, 3NT, Pass, 4H, Pass, Pass, Pass. |
|
|
|
|
A Hand from Banningham. |
|
This hand was Board 8 on Monday morning at Banningham, nobody vulnerable, dealer West. It caused lots of interest and discussion. On our table West opened 3D, how would you bid the hand and what do you think is the best contract?
|
|
"To pre-empt or not to pre-empt that is the question"
This hand was played ten times by East in a variety of contracts 3C, 4C, 5C and 3NT. On our table when West opened 3D, East bid 4C which was passed out. I wonder what East would bid if West does not open 3D......................Somebody suggested that if West passed East should open 3C or perhaps even "The Gambling 3NT"............East would be hoping that the opponents could not take too many tricks in defence before they could get in and run their long club suit and cash the Ace of Spades to give them nine tricks.
(The text book says that if your partner opens "The Gambling 3NT" you should only pass if you hold an honour card in three suits. Otherwise you should bid 4 clubs which can be left or converted to 4 Diamonds as appropriate.)
Defending 3NT N/S have four heart tricks and the AD, contract one off.............. but if South leads a Spade then West has nine top tricks contract making.
Playing in clubs there are the same four losers, (three hearts and a diamond) assuming the six of clubs is removed from the dummy.......that is again only nine tricks
Is West perhaps a little light to open 3D with just two Kings.....The 'Rule of 500' says that to pre-empt non-vulnerable you should see 6 tricks in own your hand, and to pre-empt vulnerable you should see seven tricks in your own hand.
If West does not bid is East too strong to open 3C or 3NT with the singleton AS as well as a long solid minor and would it in fact be better to open 1 Club............. or should it be 2 Clubs?
The ten times East played this hand it only went off twice giving N/S a positive score of 50 points. The best scores went to the players who played in 3NT making............. but as we can see that can go off one.
Much of the discussion I overheard was about pre-empts........................but was there a pre-empt there at all?......................Please send in your thoughts on this hand how you think the bidding should go and the final contract.
|
|
|
|
|